REMOVAL OF WATER-IN-CRUDE OIL EMULSIONS USING HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC ACRYLIC MACROMOLECULES

Abstract

The present disclosure refers to the development of novel random bipolymers, which are comprised of alkyl acrylate and alkoxy alkyl acrylate monomers, as hydrophobic and hydrophilic components, respectively. These bipolymers are synthesized by means of semi-continuous emulsion polymerization, under strict conditions of monomer deficiency, to ensure the randomness and homogeneity of the chains. The application in dissolution of these random bipolymers has shown a dehydrating capacity superior to that of polyethers and phenolic resins, with the additional advantage of being soluble in crude oil. The random bipolymers show excellent performance as breakers of water-in-crude oil emulsions, coalescers of water droplets and clarifiers of the removed aqueous phase, and are chemically stable under acidic conditions.

Claims

1. A demulsifier agent for removing emulsified water in crude oil, comprising a random bipolymer based on alkylacrylate—alkoxyalkylacrylate having the following structural formula (1) with molecular masses from 800 to 853 000 g mol.sup.−1: ##STR00002## wherein: R.sub.1 and R.sub.3=H (hydrogen) or CH.sub.3 (methyl); R.sub.2=CH.sub.3 (methyl), C.sub.2H.sub.5 (ethyl), C.sub.4H.sub.9 (n-butyl), C.sub.4H.sub.9 (iso-butyl), C.sub.4H.sub.9 (tent-butyl), C.sub.5H.sub.11 (pentyl), C.sub.6H.sub.13 (n-hexyl), C.sub.6H.sub.11 (di(ethylene glycol)ethylether), C.sub.8H.sub.17 (2-ethylhexyl), C.sub.9H.sub.19 (3,5,5-trimethylhexyl), C.sub.8H.sub.17 (n-octyl), C.sub.8H.sub.17 (iso-octyl), C.sub.8H.sub.9 (ethylene glycol phenyl ether), C.sub.10H.sub.21 (n-decyl), C.sub.10H.sub.21 (iso-decyl), C.sub.10H.sub.19 (10-undecenyl), C.sub.10H.sub.19 (tert-butylcyclohexyl), C.sub.12H.sub.25 (n-dodecyl), C.sub.15H.sub.37 (n-octadecyl), C.sub.5H.sub.9O (tetrahydrofurfuryl), C.sub.5H.sub.9 O(2-tetrahydropyranyl), C.sub.13H.sub.27 (tridecyl) or C.sub.22H.sub.45 (behenyl), and can optionally include heteroatoms of an ether group and/or benzene type aromatic rings; R.sub.4=C.sub.2H.sub.5O (methoxymethyl), C.sub.3H.sub.7O (2-methoxyethyl), C.sub.4H.sub.9O (2-ethoxyethyl), C.sub.4H.sub.9O(3-methoxypropyl), C.sub.5H.sub.11O(3-ethoxypropyl), C.sub.5H.sub.11O.sub.2(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethyl) or C.sub.8H.sub.9O (2-phenoxyethyl), and can optionally include phenyl groups and/or alkyl groups of cyclic or branched chains of C.sub.1 to C.sub.20; x=about 4 to about 1000; y=about 4 to about 1000; “x” and “y′ can be present in random sequences.

2. The demulsifier agent according to the claim 1, wherein the alkyl acrylate is selected from the group consisting of methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, pentyl acrylate, iso-butyl acrylate, tent-butyl acrylate, hexyl acrylate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, 3,5,5-trimethylhexyl acrylate, 4-tert-butylcyclohexyl acrylate, octyl acrylate, iso-decyl acrylate, decyl acrylate, lauryl acrylate, tridecyl acrylate, octadecyl acrylate, behenyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, pentyl methacrylate, iso-butyl methacrylate, tert-butyl methacrylate, hexyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, 3,5,5-trimethylhexyl methacrylate, 4-tert-butylcyclohexyl methacrylate, octyl methacrylate, iso-decyl methacrylate, decyl methacrylate, lauryl methacrylate, tridecyl methacrylate, octadecyl methacrylate, behenyl methacrylate, and combinations thereof.

3. The demulsifier agent according to the claim 1, wherein the alkoxyalkyl acrylateis selected from the group consisting of 2-methoxyethyl acrylate, 2-phenoxyethyl acrylate, di(ethylene glycol)ethyl ether acrylate, 2-methoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-phenoxyethyl methacrylate, di(ethylene glycol)ethyl ether methacrylate, 2-ethoxyethyl acrylate, 2-ethoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-butoxyethyl acrylate, 2-butoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-ethoxymethyl acrylate, 2-ethoxymethyl methacrylate, and combinations thereof.

4. The demulsifier agent according to claim 1, comprising about 55 to about 99% by weight of the alkyl acrylate and about 1 to about 45% by weight of the alkoxy alkyl acrylate.

5. The demulsifier agent according to the claim 1, wherein the random bipolymer is formulated as a dissolution comprising organic solvent in an amount between abut 3 and about 60 wt %.

6. The demulsifier agent according to the claim 5, where the organic solvent has a boiling point from about 30 to about 250° C.

7. A method of using the demulsifier agent according to the claim 6, where the demulsifier agent is dosed at a concentration of about 10 to about 2000 ppm.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0065] The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

[0066] Reference to the drawings below will be made with the aim of having a better understanding regarding the removal of water-in-oil emulsions using hydrophobic and hydrophilic acrylic macromolecules, object of the present disclosure:

[0067] FIG. 1 shows the performance of random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate - alkoxy alkyl acrylate as demulsifying agents in the Xihil-1 light crude oil of 33.4° API, products of the present disclosure, which were synthesized with different monomeric composition, establishing the following nomenclature for them: KE-82, KE-73, KE-91 and KE-64, in order to be compared with the FD-1 commercial formulation —polyether formulation based on poly(ethylene oxide) /poly(propylene oxide) (PEO/PPO)— at a dosage of 1500 ppm.

[0068] FIG. 2 shows the images of the bottles and the micrographs of crude oil samples after the assessment of the KE-82 and KE-73 demulsifying agents —products of the present disclosure— and the FD-1 commercial formulation in the Xihil-1 light crude oil of 33.4° API, at a dosage of 1500 ppm. The crude oil samples treated with the aforementioned demulsifying agents are compared with the crude oil without demulsifier agent (labeled as blank). The micrographs show that the KE-82 and KE-73 random bipolymers are able to completely remove the emulsified water from crude oil, conversely, the micrograph of the crude oil treated with the FD-1 commercial formulation shows the presence of water droplets. Clarification of the removed water using the KE-82 and KE-73 random bipolymers is slightly higher than that observed with the FD-1 commercial formulation comprised of four PEO-PPO polyethers.

[0069] FIG. 3 shows the performance of random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate -alkoxy alkyl acrylate, synthesized with different monomeric composition, as demulsifying agents in the Xihil-1 light crude oil of 33.4° API at a dosage of 1000 ppm and compared with the FD-1 commercial formulation.

[0070] FIG. 4 shows the images of the bottles and the micrographs of the crude oil samples after the evaluation with the KE-82 and KE-73 demulsifying agents —products of the present disclosure— and the FD-1 commercial formulation, in the Xihil-1 light crude oil of 33.4° API, at a dosage of 1000 ppm. The crude oil samples evaluated with the aforementioned demulsifying agents are compared with the crude oil sample without demulsifying agent (blank). The KE-82 and KE-73 random bipolymers are capable to remove 100 vol % of emulsified water, whereas the FD-1 commercial formulation scarcely removes 75 vol %. The clarification of the removed water using the KE-82 and KE-73 random bipolymers is higher than the obtained with the FD-lcom mercial formulation.

[0071] FIG. 5 shows the performance of random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate -alkoxy alkyl acrylate, synthesized with different monomeric composition, as demulsifying agents in the Xihil-1 light crude oil of 33.4° API at a dosage of 500 ppm and compared with the FD-1 commercial formulation.

[0072] FIG. 6 shows the images of the bottles and the micrographs of the crude oil samples after the evaluation with the KE-82, KE-73, KE-91 and KE-64 demulsifying agents —products of the present disclosure— and the FD-1 commercial formulation, in the Xihil-1 light crude oil of 33.4° API, at a dosage of 500 ppm. The crude oil samples treated with the aforementioned demulsifying agents are compared with the crude oil samples without demulsifying agent (blank). The KE-82, KE-73, KE-91 and KE-64 random bipolymers were able to remove the 100 vol % of emulsified water, in contrast, the FD-1 formulation scarcely removed 63 vol %. The clarification of the removed water using the KE-82, KE-73 and KE-91 random bipolymers is higher than the observed with the FD-1 commercial formulation FD-1 and the KE-64 random bipolymer.

[0073] FIG. 7 shows the performance of random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate -alkoxy alkyl acrylate, synthesized with different monomeric composition, as demulsifying agents in the Xihil-2 heavy crude oil of 20.2° API, at a dosage of 1500 ppm and compared with the FD-1 commercial formulation.

[0074] FIG. 8 shows the images of the bottles and the micrographs of the remaining emulsions in the crude oil samples after the evaluation with the KE-82 and FD-1 in the Xihil-2 heavy crude oil of 20.2° API, at a dosage of 1500 ppm. The crude oil sample evaluated with the aforementioned demulsifying agents are compared with the crude oil sample without demulsifying agent (blank). The KE-82 and FD-1 demulsifier agents were able to remove the 100 vol % of emulsified water. However, it should be noted that the clarification of the removed water employing the KE-82 random bipolymer is notably higher than the observed with the FD-1 commercial formulation.

[0075] FIG. 9 shows the performance of random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate -alkoxy alkyl acrylate, synthesized with different monomeric composition, as demulsifying agents in the Xihil-2 heavy crude oil of 20.2° API, at a dosage of 1000 ppm and compared with the FD-1 commercial formulation.

[0076] FIG. 10 shows the images of the bottles and the micrographs of the crude oil samples after the evaluation with the KE-82 and FD-1 demulsifying agents in the Xihil-2 heavy crude oil of 20.2° API, ata dosage of 1000 ppm. The crude oil sample evaluated with the aforementioned demulsifying agents are compared with the crude oil sample without demulsifying agent (blank). The KE-82 random bipolymer was able to remove the 100 vol % of emulsified water, displaying a higher efficiency in comparison with the rest of random bipolymers. Furthermore, the removed water by the KE-82 bipolymer exhibits a better clarification in comparison to the obtained with the FD-1 commercial formulation, which removes 90 vol % of emulsified water.

[0077] FIG. 11 shows the performance of random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate -alkoxy alkyl acrylate, synthesized with different monomeric composition, as demulsifying agents in the Xihil-2 heavy crude oil of 20.2° API, at a dosage of 500 ppm and compared with the FD-1 commercial formulation.

[0078] FIG. 12 shows the images of the bottles and the micrographs of the remaining emulsions in the crude oil after the evaluation of KE-82 and FD-1 demulsifying agents in Xihil-2 heavy crude oil of 20.2° API, at a dosage of 500 ppm. The samples of crude oil treated with the aforementioned demulsifier agents are compared with the crude oil without demulsifying agent (blank). KE-82 random bipolymer was able to remove the 100 vol % of emulsified water, on the contrary, the FD-1 commercial formulation barely removed 57 vol %. The clarification of the removed water using the KE-82 random bipolymer is superior to that observed with the FD-1 commercial formulation.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE

[0079] The present disclosure is related to novel random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate and their use as demulsifying agents of crude oil, specifically, to treat water/crude oil (W/O) emulsions, in order to remove the emulsified water and the salts dissolved in this last one, mainly, in the separation units set for crude oils (inshore and offshore) with gravities from 10 to 40° API.

[0080] The random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate -alkoxy alkyl acrylate of the present disclosure are synthesized as latexes using semi-continuous emulsion polymerization as described in the Mexican patent No. MX 338861B [26]; the monomers should be added into the addition tank to form a pre-emulsion according to the following proportions: the alkyl acrylate monomer is set up on an interval between 55.0 and 99.0 wt % and the alkoxy alkyl acrylate monomer is set up on an interval between 1.0 and 45.0 wt %. Finally, the random bipolymer obtained as a latex is submitted to a distillation process at a temperature between 70 and 125° C. in order to obtain a viscous liquid. Afterwards, the random bipolymer —as a viscous liquid— is dissolved in an adequate organic solvent with boiling points between 30 and 250° C., such as: dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, chloroform, acetone, dimethylsulfoxide, tetrahydrofuran, benzene and its derivatives, toluene, xylene, kerosene, jet fuel and naphtha; individually or as a mixture, for its final application as demulsifying agents of crude oils with gravities ranging from 10 to 40° API. The concentration of the random bipolymer in the solution is set up on an interval from 3.0 to 55.0 wt %; whereas the solution dosage in the crude oil can be set up on an interval of concentrations from 10 to 2000 ppm.

[0081] Formula (1) shows the structure of the random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate of the present disclosure:

##STR00001##

[0082] where: R.sub.1, R.sub.2, R.sub.3 and R.sub.4 are independent radicals represented by the groups that are hereby mentioned: R.sub.1 and R.sub.3=H (hydrogen) or CH.sub.3 (methyl).

[0083] R.sub.2=CH.sub.3 (methyl), C.sub.2H.sub.5 (ethyl), C.sub.4H.sub.9 (n-butyl), C.sub.4H.sub.9 (iso-butyl), C.sub.4H.sub.9 (tent-butyl), C.sub.5H.sub.11 (pentyl), C.sub.6H.sub.13 (n-hexyl), C.sub.6H.sub.11 (di(ethylene glycol)ethylether), C.sub.8H.sub.17 (2-ethylhexyl), C.sub.9H.sub.19 (3,5,5-trimethylhexyl), C.sub.8H.sub.17 (n-octyl), C.sub.8H.sub.17 (iso-octyl), C.sub.8H.sub.9 (ethylene glycol phenyl ether), C.sub.10H.sub.21 (n-decyl), C.sub.10H.sub.21 (iso-decyl), C.sub.10H.sub.19 (10-undecenyl), C.sub.10H.sub.19 (tert-butylcyclohexyl), C.sub.12H.sub.25 (n-dodecyl), C.sub.18H.sub.37 (n-octadecyl), C.sub.5H.sub.9O (tetrahydrofurfuryl), C.sub.5H.sub.9O (2-tetrahydropyranyl), C.sub.13H.sub.27 (tridecyl) or C.sub.22H.sub.45 (behenyl). This aliphatic chain can contain heteroatoms of the ether group, as well as benzene type aromatic rings.

[0084] R.sub.4=C.sub.2H.sub.5O (methoxymethyl), C.sub.3H.sub.7O (2-methoxyethyl), C.sub.4H.sub.9O (2-ethoxyethyl), C.sub.4H.sub.9O (3-methoxypropyl), C.sub.5H.sub.11O (3-ethoxypropyl), C.sub.5H.sub.11O.sub.2 (2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethyl) or C.sub.8H.sub.9O (2-phenoxyethyl). The alkoxy alkyl monomer can include phenyl groups or alkyl groups of cyclic or branched chains of C.sub.1 to C.sub.20. [0085] where also: [0086] x=is a number set up from 4 to 1000. [0087] y=is a number set up from 4 to 1000. [0088] “x” and “y′ can be present in random sequences.

[0089] The number average molecular masses (M.sub.a) of the random bipolymers are set upon the interval ranging from 800 to 853000 g mol.sup.−1.

[0090] The following alkyl acrylic monomers were selected to synthesize the random bipolymers object of the present disclosure, which does not represent any limitation: methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, pentyl acrylate, iso-butyl acrylate, tent-butyl acrylate, hexyl acrylate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, 3,5,5-trimethylhexyl acrylate, 4-tert-butylcyclohexyl acrylate, octyl acrylate, iso-decyl acrylate, decyl acrylate, lauryl acrylate, tridecyl acrylate, octadecyl acrylate, behenyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, pentyl methacrylate, iso-butyl methacrylate, tent-butyl methacrylate, hexyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, 3,5,5-trimethylhexyl methacrylate, 4-tert-butylcyclohexyl methacrylate, octyl methacrylate, iso-decyl methacrylate, decyl methacrylate, lauryl methacrylate, tridecyl methacrylate, octadecyl methacrylate and behenyl methacrylate.

[0091] On the other hand, the alkoxy alkyl acrylic monomers in the present disclosure, which does not imply any limitation were selected from: 2-methoxyethyl acrylate, 2-phenoxyethyl acrylate, di(ethylene glycol)ethyl ether acrylate, 2-methoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-phenoxyethyl methacrylate, di(ethylene glycol)ethyl ether methacrylate, 2-ethoxyethyl acrylate, 2-ethoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-butoxyethyl acrylate, 2-butoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-ethoxymethyl acrylate, 2-ethoxymethyl methacrylate.

[0092] The random bipolymers of the present disclosure are dosed in effective quantities from 10 to 2000 ppm in crude oils with gravities from 10 to 40° API, in order to remove the emulsified water and the salts dissolved in the last one.

[0093] The present disclosure is described with reference to a specific number of examples, which are considered as illustrative and not as restrictive. Once the dried random bipolymer based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate were obtained, these were characterized using the following instrumental methods: [0094] 1.-Size exclusion chromatography (SEC), employing an Agilent™model 1100 size exclusion chromatograph, with a PLgel column and using tetrahydrofuran (THF) as eluent, in order to obtain the number average molecular masses of bipolymers, as well as their polydispersity indexes (I). [0095] 2.-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), using a Thermo Nicolet™ AVATAR 330 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer. The spectra were obtained using the film technique method, employing OMNIC™ 7.0 software for their processing. [0096] 3.-Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), the spectra were obtained in a Bruker Avance III HD spectrometer, the .sup.1H and .sup.13C spectra were obtained at frequencies of 300 MHz and 75 MHz, respectively. Deuterated chloroform (CDCl.sub.3) was used as solvent, while tetramethylsilane (TMS) was used as reference.

[0097] Table 1 reports the number average molecular mass and the polydispersity index obtained by SEC for the poly(alkyl acrylic—alkoxy alkyl acrylic), products of the present disclosure (R.sub.1 and R.sub.3=hydrogen, R.sub.2=n-butyl, R.sub.3=2-methoxyethyl), which does not imply any limitation.

Examples

[0098] The following examples are shown to illustrate the spectroscopic characteristics of the random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate employed as dehydrating agents in crude oils with gravities from 10 to 40° API. These examples must not be considered as limitation of what is claimed here.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Number average molecular masses (M.sub.n) and polydispersity indexes (l) determined by SEC of the random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate of KE series with different composition in wt % (products of the present disclosure). Weight ratio M.sub.n Polydispersity Bipolymer (wt %) (g mol.sup.−1) index (l) KE-91 90/10 17 080 1.98 KE-82 80/20 18 061 1.67 KE-73 70/30 18 215 1.40 KE-64 60/40 18 950 1.35 KE series Random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate-alkoxy alkyl acrylate: IR v cm.sup.−1: 3 443, 2 958, 2 937, 2 878, 1 734, 1 456, 1 380, 1 246, 1 170, 1 066, 1 030. .sup.1H NMR δ (ppm): 4.20, 4.04, 3.55, 3.36, 2.30, 1.64, 1.60, 1.38, 0.94. .sup.13C NMR δ (ppm): 174.64, 70.21, 64.55, 63.21, 58.76, 41.43, 35.34, 30.61, 19.10, 14.13, 13.75.

[0099] Evaluation of the random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate as dehydrating agents for crude oils with gravities from 10 to 40° API.

[0100] Dissolutions of each one of the synthesized bipolymers were prepared, in a range of concentration from 3.0 to 55.0 wt %, using solvents with boiling points in the interval from 30 to 250° C., as dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, chloroform, acetone, dimethylsulfoxide, tetrahydrofuran, benzene and its derivatives, toluene, xylene, kerosene, jet fuel and naphtha; individually or as a mixture. For its evaluation, an aliquot of the demulsifying agent was added at a specific concentration, in order to avoid any influence of the solvent on the destabilization of the emulsion and, consequently, affect the removal of water from the assessed crude oil. The random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate were assessed at concentrations in the interval from 10 to 2000 ppm. The random bipolymers and the FD-1 commercial formulation were simultaneously assessed, being the last one widely employed in the petroleum industry. The FD-1 commercial formulation is comprised of four PEO-PPO-PEO triblock bipolymers of different number average molecular mass. Table 2 presents the PO/EO monomer ratio and the number average molecular mass of each triblock bipolymer that comprises the FD-1 commercial formulation.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Key name, number average molecular mass (M.sub.n), and PPO/PEO ratio in wt % of the triblock bipolymers comprise the FD-1 commercial formulation. FD-1 formulation M.sub.n PPO/PEO ratio Key name (g mol.sup.−1) (wt %) TP 89 7 750 90/10 TP 03 5 330 70/30 TP 14 3 050 60/40 TP 71 1 400 90/10

[0101] The performance of the bipolymers based on alkyl acrylates—alkoxy alkyl acrylates was assessed by means of dynamic bottle test; the procedure for the aforementioned assessment is described herein. The number of bottles was specified by the number of compounds to be assessed, besides of one additional bottle that corresponds to the crude oil without demulsifier —labeled as blank—. An aliquot of the dissolution of random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate to be assessed and the commercial formulation FD-1 was added to each bottle, subsequently, the crude oil was poured into until the mark of 100 mL. The first reading of all bottles was taken at time cero, afterwards, the bottles were placed into a thermal controlled bath and immediately started the stirring of the laminar system at a speed of 60 cycles min.sup.−1. The water-in-oil emulsion breakdown was measured periodically until the end of the assessment (5 h).

[0102] Table 3 displays the physicochemical characterization of the employed crude oils on the assessments of the random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylates—alkoxy alkyl acrylates as dehydrating agents.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Physicochemical characterization of assessed crude oils to dehydration. Property Xihil-1 Xihil-2 API gravity (°API) 33.4 20.2 Salt content (lb mbb.sup.−1) 1.34 151.00 .sup.(a) Paraffins content (wt %) 0.35 0.85 Runoff temperature (° C.) −39 −18 Water content by destination (vol %) 8.0 21.0 Water and sediments (vol %) 8.2 21.1 Kinematic viscosity (mm.sup.2 s.sup.−1) @ 25° C. 9.1 764.6 Number average molecular mass 290 371 by cryoscopy (g mob.sup.−1) Saturates (wt %) 24.64 17.97 Aromatics (wt %) 31.65 17.12 Resins (wt %) 32.71 50.06 Asphaltenes (wt %) 11.26 14.71 .sup.(a) The sample was diluted.

[0103] As demonstration, which does not imply any limitation, the results of the assessment of the water removal efficiency of the random bipolymers claimed in this disclosure as demulsifying agents are displayed in FIGS. 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11; while FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 show the images of the bottles and micrographs of the crude oils samples after the assessment with the demulsifying agents.

[0104] FIG. 1 displays the effect of the composition of the random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate, at a dosage of 1500 ppm in the Xihil-1 crude oil with an API gravity of 33.4°. The KE-82 bipolymer was the first to achieve the destabilization of the water-in-oil emulsion at 40 min; however, at the end of the assessment, it removed the same amount of emulsified water than the KE-73 bipolymer, 88 vol %; which induced the emulsion destabilization until 240 min. The FD-1 commercial formulation prompted the emulsion breakdown at the same time that the KE-82 bipolymer; though, this showed a low coalescence rate, it reached a maximal water removal of 80 vol %. On the other hand, even though the KE-91 bipolymer exhibited the best performance as emulsion breaker, scarcely removed 13 vol % of emulsified water. Finally, the KE-64 bipolymer was not able to induce the emulsion breakdown.

[0105] FIG. 2 compares the bottle of the crude oil without demulsifier agent —blank— with the bottles of crude oil treated with the KE-82 and KE-731 random acrylic bipolymers, as well as the crude oil treated with the FD-1 commercial formulation. Firstly, it is observed the stability of the emulsion, because the blank sample does not display the presence of removed water. Secondly, a well-defined interface of removed water/crude oil can be distinguished in the KE-82 and KE-73 bipolymers, as well as for the FD-1 commercial formulation. Nonetheless, the aqueous phase clarification induced by the KE-82 bipolymer is slightly superior to the obtained with the KE-73 bipolymer and the FD-1 commercial formulation. On the other hand, the dehydrating efficiency of both random acrylic bipolymers is greater than that reached with the

[0106] FD-1 commercial formulation. This statement is confirmed with the micrographs of the crude oil after the treatment with the respective demulsifying agent, where it can be noticed in the micrographs of crude oil treated with the KE-82 and KE-73 random bipolymers, a low amount of emulsified water with water droplets size around 0.1 μm, whereas with the FD-1 commercial formulation, it is noticed a high amount of emulsified water with water droplets size of at least 5 times bigger than the aforementioned bipolymers.

[0107] FIG. 3 shows the dehydrating performance of the random bipolymers of the KE series in the Xihil-1 crude oil (33.4° API), at a dosage of 1000 ppm. As can be observed, when the dosage is decreased the KE-82 and KE-73 bipolymers are able to utterly remove all the emulsified water at the end of evaluation. It is noteworthy to point out the high coalescence rate of the KE-82 random bipolymer during all the assessment in comparison with the KE-73 random bipolymer. Therefore, a high weight content of alkyl acrylate monomer prompts a higher diffusion through the natural surfactant barrier —asphaltenes and resines—, which is evidently reflected in a higher coalescence rate of the emulsified water droplets. On the other hand, the KE-64 random acrylic bipolymer displayed a low water removal performance, scarcely removing 50 vol %, being surpassed by the FD-1 commercial formulation, which was able to remove 75 vol %. Similar to the assessment with 1500 ppm, the KE-91 bipolymer exhibited the lowest water removal efficiency, barely removing 13 vol %.

[0108] FIG. 4 compares the bottle of crude oil without demulsifier agent —blank— with the bottles of crude oil dosed with the KE-82 and KE-73 random acrylic bipolymers, furthermore, with the FD-1 commercial formulation. Firstly, the blank does not display the presence of removed water, which denotes the high stability of the water-in-crude oil emulsion. Moreover, it can be noted a homogeneous removed water/crude oil interface for the KE-82 and KE-73 random acrylic bipolymers, as well as for the FD-1 commercial formulation. It should be remarked that the clarification induced by the acrylic bipolymers and commercial formulation is excellent and comparable between them. However, the dehydrating efficiency of both bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate is superior to that of the FD-1 commercial formulation, which can be corroborated in the micrographs of the crude oil dosed with the KE-82 and KE-73 bipolymers, where are only observed conglomerates, possibly of paraffins or asphaltenes. In contrast, the micrograph of the crude oil treated with the FD-1 formulation displays remaining water/crude oil emulsion with a polydisperse droplet size between 0.1 and 0.6 μm.

[0109] FIG. 5 reports the dehydrating performance of the random bipolymers of the KE series, assessed in the Xihil-1 crude oil (33.4° API), at a dosage of 500 ppm. It can be noted that, at this dosage, the KE-91, KE-82, KE-73 and KE-64 random acrylic bipolymers —based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate— are able to withdraw all the emulsified water. The KE-73 random acrylic bipolymer displayed the best performance as emulsion breaker; nevertheless, about the coalescence performance, it was surpassed by the KE-82 random acrylic bipolymer, which achieved the total water removal at 60 min of the assessment, also displaying the highest coalescence rate. Conversely, even though the KE-91 bipolymer displayed the lowest emulsion breaking capacity, it displayed a better coalescence rate than the KE-64 random bipolymer and the FD-1 commercial formulation; being the last one, which showed the lowest coalescence rate, scarcely removed 60 vol %. In this sense, it is clear that, at a dosage of 1000 and 1500 ppm an overdose effect was observed, where, by one side, the KE-64 bipolymer displayed a diffusion hindrance through the crude oil and, while second side, although the KE-91 bipolymer was able to break the emulsion, the overdose of this bipolymer created a barrier around the water droplets that hindered the coalescence of water droplets. Therefore, at the lowest dosage, all random bipolymers displayed a better performance than the FD-1 commercial formulation.

[0110] FIG. 6 compares the bottle of crude oil without demulsifier —blank— with the KE-91, KE-82, KE-73 and KE-64 random acrylic bipolymers, besides the FD-1 commercial formulation.

[0111] Firstly, there can be observed well-defined and homogeneous interfaces for the KE series and the FD-1 commercial formulation. Secondly, the KE-82 and KE-91 random bipolymers stand out for the excellent clarification of the removed water, while the KE-73 and KE-64 random bipolymers display a comparable clarification to that of the FD-1 commercial formulation. Regarding the water removal efficiency, the performance of the random acrylic bipolymers is highly superior compared with the commercial formulation. The aforementioned statement is evident on the micrographs of the crude oil dosed with the KE-82, KE-73, KE-91 and KE-64 bipolymers where there is no remaining emulsion, which confirms the total removal of emulsified water; on the other hand, the sample of crude treated with the FD-1 commercial formulation displays a remaining emulsion with water droplets size between 0.1 and 0.7 μm.

[0112] FIG. 7 depicts the performance of the random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate -alkoxyalkyl acrylate assessed in the Xihil-2 heavy crude oil (20.2° API), at a dosage of 1500 ppm. As it can be observed, the KE-82 and KE-91 random acrylic bipolymers displayed a similar coalescence rate between them, though slightly underneath than that of the FD-1 commercial formulation. However, the KE-82 random acrylic bipolymer reached the total water removal 30 min before than the KE-91 random acrylic bipolymer and the FD-1 commercial formulation, both being able to withdraw the 100 vol % of emulsified water at 120 min. On the other hand, even though the KE-73 and KE-64 random acrylic bipolymers were the last to destabilize the emulsion, the KE-73 bipolymer reached the total water removal at 180 min; while the KE-64 bipolymer removed 90 vol %.

[0113] In FIG. 8 can be firstly observed that the emulsion was stable under the assessment conditions since the crude oil without demulsifier agent —blank— does not display the presence of removed water. On the other hand, a homogeneous interface can be distinguished for the KE-82 random acrylic bipolymer and the FD-1 commercial formulation. Nonetheless, the clarification induced by the KE-82 random acrylic bipolymer is remarkably better than that induced by the FD-1 commercial formulation, despite that both withdrew all the emulsified water. This last statement is confirmed by the micrographs of the crude oil dosed with each product, respectively.

[0114] FIG. 9 shows the demulsifier performance of random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate assessed in the Xihil-2 heavy crude oil (20.2° API), at a dosage of 1000 ppm. Overall, it could be observed that when the concentration of demulsifying agent is reduced, there is a dwindled in the water removal efficiency, with exception of the KE-82 random bipolymer, which achieved the complete removal of emulsified water at 180 min. On the other hand, even though the FD-1 commercial formulation showed the higher coalescence speed during the first 30 min of the evaluation, it only removed the 90 vol %. Even though the KE-73 bipolymer was the last one in destabilizing the emulsion, it reached the same water removal efficiency than the FD-1 formulation. Finally, the KE-91 random bipolymer induced the emulsion breakdown before than the KE-64 random bipolymer; yet, both reached a water removal of 86 vol %.

[0115] FIG. 10 displays, firstly, the high emulsion stability of the blank sample —without demulsifier agent—, where it is not observed the presence of removed water. Secondly, it is observed that the KE-82 random bipolymer and the FD-1 commercial formulation induce a homogenous and well-defined removed water/crude oil interface; furthermore, both displayed an excellent clarification of the removed water. On the other hand, about the micrograph of crude oil sample treated with the FD-1 commercial formulation, it is visible the presence of residual emulsion with water droplets size between 0.6 and 1.8 μm; whereas the micrograph of crude oil sample dosed with the KE-82 random acrylic bipolymer displays no remaining emulsion in the organic phase.

[0116] FIG. 11 displays the performance of random bipolymers based on alkyl acrylate—alkoxy alkyl acrylate assessed in the Xihil-2 heavy crude oil (20.2° API), at dosage of 500 ppm. As can be observed, all the demulsifying agents show a decrement in the coalescence rate.

[0117] However, the KE-82 bipolymer was the first one of all random acrylic bipolymers to destabilize the emulsion, exhibited the high coalescence rate and was able to remove all the emulsified water. Despite the fact that the KE-91 bipolymer showed a coalescence rate similar to that of the FD-1 commercial formulation during the first 60 min of testing, it achieved a notable higher water removal efficiency, 90 and 57 vol %, respectively. Finally, the KE-73 and KE-64 bipolymers showed a low demulsifying performance, barely removing 43 and 33 vol %, respectively.

[0118] FIG. 12 compares the bottles of crude oil without demulsifier agent —labeled as blank—, with the bottles of crude oil treated with the KE-82 bipolymer and the FD-1 commercial formulation. It can be seen that both demulsifying agents induce a homogeneous removed water/crude oil interface. However, the KE-82 bipolymer stands out for having a significantly higher efficiency and clarification than the FD-1 commercial formulation. On the other hand, the micrograph of the crude oil treated with the KE-82 bipolymer shows no remaining emulsion in the organic phase; while the micrograph of the sample of crude oil dosed with the FD-1 commercial formulation, it is noticeable the presence of remaining emulsion with polydisperse water droplet sizes between 0.1 and 1.4 μm.