MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
20180065109 ยท 2018-03-08
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01J35/30
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J35/40
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
G01N23/20075
PHYSICS
C01P2002/72
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B13/18
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01P2002/60
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C01B13/18
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J35/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The invention relates to the field of mesoporous materials and in particular to mesoporous rare earth oxides and a method of their synthesis.
Claims
1. A method of making a mesoporous rare earth oxide material, the method comprising; at a reduced pressure, contacting a mesoporous template with a precursor solution that comprises a rare earth metal salt or neutral complex of a rare earth metal, so as to impregnate the mesoporous template; calcining the impregnated mesoporous template to form a rare earth oxide material in situ; and removing the mesoporous template from the calcined material.
2. A method according to claim 1, comprising contacting the mesoporous template with a non-aqueous precursor solution so as to impregnate the mesoporous template
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the precursor solution comprises ethanol as a solvent.
4. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the precursor solution comprises cerium.
5. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the precursor solution is a saturated solution, optionally comprising more than 20 wt % of precursor salt.
6. A method according to any preceding claim, comprising calcining at more than one temperature.
7. A method according to claim 6, comprising calcination at a first temperature for a first period of time and at a higher second temperature for a second period of time.
8. A method according to any preceding claim, comprising chemically removing the mesoporous template, by treating with a chemical capable of eroding or digesting the template.
9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the mesoporous template is a silicate material, the method comprising treatment with aqueous alkali metal hydroxide at room temperature.
10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the aqueous alkali metal hydroxide is NaOH(aq) and has a concentration of between around 1-3 M.
11. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the method comprises making a mixed metal oxide material, comprising atoms/ion of a rare earth metal and one or more further metals, using a precursor solution comprising a mixture of a rare earth metal salt and/or neutral metal complex of the rare earth and one or more further metal salts and/or neutral metal complexes of the further metals, in solution.
12. A method according to any preceding claim, comprising exposing the mesoporous template to the reduced pressure and subsequently contacting the precursor solution therewith.
13. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the reduced pressure is between around 10.sup.2-10.sup.11 atm, or 10.sup.5-10.sup.8 atm.
14. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the pressure is increased whilst the mesoporous template and the precursor solution are in contact, subsequent to contacting the mesoporous template with the precursor solution at a reduced pressure.
15. A method according to any preceding claim, comprising drying the impregnated mesoporous template, to remove a portion or substantially all of the solvent, by gently heating at a temperature between around 75-125 C.
16. A method according to any preceding claim, comprising method may comprise repeating one or more, or a sequence of steps.
17. A method according to claim 16, comprising contacting the mesoporous template with a precursor solution at a reduced pressure and, optionally, washing and/or drying the impregnated mesoporous template, on more than one occasion.
18. A method according to claim 16 or 17, comprising repeating a treatment to remove the mesoporous template.
19. A method according to any one of claims 16-18, comprising calcining the impregnated mesoporous template on more than one occasion.
20. A method according to claim 19, wherein calcination is conducted between successive impregnation steps.
21. A mesoporous rare earth oxide material obtained or obtainable by a method in accordance with any preceding claim.
22. A mesoporous rare earth oxide material wherein the mesopores are defined by crystalline rare earth metal oxide material and/or aligned crystallites of rare earth oxide material.
23. A mesoporous rare earth oxide material according to claim 22, wherein the order is evident as high angle reflections in powder XRD patterns taken from the material; and peaks in small angle X-ray scattering data and/or digital diffraction patterns obtained from regions of TEM images.
24. A mesoporous rare earth oxide material, characterised by one or a combination of; a specific pore volume greater than 50% or 60% of the theoretical value; high angle reflections in powder XRD patterns taken from the material; and peaks in small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data and/or digital diffraction patterns obtained from regions of TEM images; powder XRD patterns with peak widths indicative of average crystallite sizes in the range of at least 20 nm, or between around 20-40 nm; as fit to the Scherrer equation; mesopores defined by crystalline rare earth metal oxide material and/or aligned crystallites of rare earth oxide material.
25. A mesoporous rare earth oxide material of any one of claims 21-24, wherein the material is a ceria or doped ceria.
26. The use of a mesoporous rare earth oxide material according to any one of claims 21-25 to catalyse an oxidation process and/or a reduction process.
27. The use according to claim 26, wherein the mesoporous rare earth oxide material is used as a catalyst in a process which comprises both oxidation and reduction of species contacting the catalyst.
28. The use according to claim 26 or 27, as a redox catalyst in an exhaust stream, as a two way catalyst or as a three way catalyst.
29. The use of a mesoporous rare earth oxide material according to any one of claims 21-25 as an electrode, such as a fuel cell electrode and/or an electrolyte material of a fuel cell.
30. The use according to claim 29, in an intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell.
31. The use of a mesoporous rare earth oxide material according to any one of claims 21-25 in a photovoltaic device.
32. The use according to claim 31, wherein the mesoporous rare earth oxide material is used as a solid support for a photovoltaic material, such as a photoactive dye.
33. The use according to claim 31 or 32, as a bulk heterojunction.
34. An article comprising a mesoporous rare earth metal oxide material in accordance with any one of claims 21-25.
35. An article according to claim 34, comprising a redox catalyst.
36. An article according to claim 35, wherein the article comprises a cartridge for use in an exhaust stream, such as a vehicle exhaust or a power generator exhaust.
37. An article according to claim 35 or 36, wherein the article is or comprises a catalytic converter for a vehicle.
38. An article according to claim 34 or 35, wherein the article is a fuel cell electrode.
39. An article according to claim 34 or 35, wherein the article is a fuel cell electrolyte structure.
40. An article according to claim 34 or 35, comprising both a fuel cell electrode and an electrolyte structure.
41. An article according to claim 30, wherein the mesoporous rare earth metal oxide material of the electrode and electrolyte structure is of the same or similar composition and/or density.
42. An article according to claim 34 or 35, wherein the article is a fuel cell, in which one or more electrodes or an electrolyte structure comprises a mesoporous rare earth oxide material in accordance with any one of claims 21-25.
43. An article according to claim 34, wherein the article is a photovoltaic device.
44. An article according to claim 43, wherein the photovoltaic device is a bulk heterojunction.
45. An article according to claim 44, wherein the heterojunction comprises a said mesoporous rare earth oxide material impregnated with a photoactive dye.
46. A solar cell, comprising a bulk heterojunction according to claim 45.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0138] Example embodiments will now be described with reference to the following drawings in which:
[0139]
[0140]
[0141]
[0142]
[0143]
[0144]
[0145]
[0146]
[0147]
[0148]
[0149]
[0150]
[0151]
[0152]
[0153]
[0154]
[0155]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS
[0156] Disclosed herein is a new method for impregnating/infiltrating a mesoporous template under vacuum (reduced pressure), to prepare mesoporous rare earth oxide materials. The novel vacuum impregnation (VI) methods of the present invention reduces the reliance on capillary action for the incorporation of the precursor salt solution into the mesoporous template. The method has yielded better results than the traditional incipient wetness impregnation technique (IWIT) and is both simpler and quicker to perform.
Experimental
[0157] Mesoporous silica templates SBA-15 and KIT-6 were synthesised following procedures available in the literature, as described by Zhao et al, Science 279 (1998) 548 and Kleitz et al, Chemical Communications (2003) 2136. and In a typical synthesis of SBA-15, 2 g of the non-ionic surfactant, Pluronic P123 (EO.sub.20PO.sub.70EO.sub.20; where EO.sub.n is poly(ethylene oxide) and PO.sub.n is poly(propylene oxide), was added to 15 cm.sup.3 deionized water and 60 cm.sup.3 of 2M HCl and stirred at 40 C. for 8 h. The Pluronic surfactant was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Pluronic is a trademark of BASF.
[0158] 4.25 g tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS 99%; obtained from Fluka) was added and stirred for 24 h at the same temperature. This mixture was hydrothermally treated at 100 C. for 24 h in a Teflon container. Teflon is a trademark of the DuPont Chemical Company. The resulting white solid was filtered, washed and dried. The surfactant was removed by calcining at 500 C.
[0159] In a typical synthesis of KIT-6, 6 g of Pluronic P123 was added to 180 cm.sup.3 deionized water and 50 cm.sup.3 of 2M HCl and stirred at 35 C. for 6 h. 6 g of n-butanol (Sigma, 99%) was added and stirred for 1 h. 12.48 g TEOS was added and the mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 24 h followed by hydrothermal treatment as above. The resulting white solid was filtered, washed and dried. The surfactant was removed as above.
[0160] The precursor salt solutions used to make the mesoporous rare earth oxide materials described below were prepared by dissolving in 0.5 cm.sup.3 of ethanol either 1 g of the metal nitrate, e.g. Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O; (Acros, 99.5%) to prepare mesoporous CeO.sub.2 or 1 g of a mixture of nitrates, e.g. a 9:1 molar ratio of the Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O and Gd(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O (Alfa Aesar, 99.9%) to prepare the Ce.sub.0.9Gd.sub.0.1O.sub.1.9 (CGO).
[0161] Apparatus for performing vacuum impregnation is shown schematically in
[0162] Initially, all taps were closed. A particle trap was placed in line with the vacuum pump to prevent contamination of the rotary pump used to apply the vacuum.
[0163] In a typical VI experiment a volume of template (0.1-2.0 g depending on the experiment) was placed into the test tube. The apparatus was then assembled as per
[0164] The rotary pump was switched on and tap T2 was opened slowly to ensure no template was sucked down the vacuum line (due to the light and voluminous nature of the template). The test tube was tapped lightly to help remove air pockets during the early stage of the evacuation process. The template was then left to evacuate for 4-6 h.
[0165] A precursor solution consisting of the impregnating salt (or other precursor material), was stirred for at least 6 h at 30-60 C. to ensure it was a homogeneous mixture. The solutions used in this work were ethanol saturated with Ce(NO.sub.3).6H.sub.2O, or ethanol with replacement of 10 mol % of the cerium salt by Gd(NO.sub.3).6H.sub.2O.
[0166] The volume of precursor solution used in the impregnation step exceeded the volume required to impregnate all of the pores in the template in order to ensure the vacuum was not compromised during impregnation by ingress of air through the dropping funnel. The solution was placed in the dropping funnel and left for any air bubbles to dissipate.
[0167] T2 was closed and the pump was switched off.
[0168] T1 was opened slowly at first to allow the solution to completely cover the template and then, once sufficient volume of solution was admitted to completely impregnate the template, T1 was closed.
[0169] Accordingly, at this stage, and at the reduced pressure, the mesoporous template was contacted with the precursor solution.
[0170] T2, and then T3 were opened to return the system to atmospheric pressure and complete the impregnation. This could be observed by rapid infiltration of the precursor solution into the template.
[0171] Excess solution was then decanted before the sample was dried at 95-105 C. in air in an oven.
[0172] The sample was calcined at 400 and 600 C. in air for 5 h at each temperature (ramp rate 1 C. min.sup.1) using a tube furnace.
[0173] The silica template was dissolved by stirring with approximately 20 cm.sup.3 of 1-2 M NaOH. Centrifugation was used to recover the product from the solution. This step was repeated three times. The product was then dried in an oven at 105 C. overnight.
[0174] For the materials used for the photovoltaic work, a vacuum desiccator was used instead of a test tube and a water pump was used instead of a rotary pump. The precursor solution was added directly into the air inlet. After the product was dried at 95-105 C. in air in an oven, the sample was calcined at 400 C. in air for 5 h (ramp rate 1 C. min.sup.1), and then impregnated a second time. After this the sample was calcined at 400 and 600 C. in air for 5 h at each temperature (ramp rate 1 C. min.sup.1), before the silica template was dissolved by stirring with approximately 20 cm.sup.3 of 1-2 M NaOH. Buchner filtration was used to recover the sample from the solution. The sample was sucked dry. This step was repeated three times.
[0175] Products are referred to below by their composition (Ceria or CGO) and with a suffix to represent the mesoporous template used to prepare them (-S for SBA-15 and -K for KIT-6).
[0176] For comparison, a nanoparticulate but non-mesoporous ceria (which is referred to below as Ceria-X) was produced without the use of a template, by calcining cerium citrate (prepared from Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O and citric acid (Alfa Aesar, 99.5%).
[0177] A Micrometrics ASAP 2020 instrument operating at 77 K was used to obtain Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms, Specific Surface Areas (SSAs) and Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore-size distributions (PSD) of all products.
[0178] Powder X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) data was collected using a Philips PW 1710 diffractometer with Cu K.sub.a radiation (=1.54 ). Scan rates in a typical experiment were 1 min.sup.1 over a range of 2=10-80. Peak-width analysis was performed by fitting a Gaussian curve to the raw data and applying the Sherrer equation in order to obtain estimates of average crystallite size (see Klug, H.; Alexander, L. in: X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials, John Wiley, New York, 1974, p. 618).
[0179] Small-angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS) patterns were collected using a Hecus X-ray Systems Generation 1 instrument incorporating a modified compact Kratky camera with slit focussing and a PSD. Samples were run using a SpiCap attachment and with Cu K.sub.a radiation at 40 kV and 30 mA. Data were analysed using FindGraph peak-fitting software.
[0180] Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images were recorded using a JEOL JEM 2011 instrument fitted with a LaB.sub.6 filament and operating at 200 kV. Semi-quantitative elemental analysis by Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) was performed using the Oxford Instruments X-Ray analysis ISIS 300 detector mounted on the TEM instrument. The DigitalMicrograph 3.4.4 graphics suite (Gatan) was used to analyse the TEM images and to obtain Digital Diffraction Patterns (DDPs) from the images by fast Fourier transform. Unless stated, no TEM images were manipulated using inverse-FFT functions. Elemental analysis on bulk samples was performed by Inductively Coupled PlasmaMass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) using an Agilent 7500 instrument.
[0181] Temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) experiments were collected using custom-built TPR equipment coupled to a quadrupole mass spectrometer system. The sample was heated from ambient to 800 C. at 5 C./min under a flow of 5% H.sub.2 in Ar.
[0182] Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) experiments were performed in the same way but under a flow of pure Ar. 50 mg of sample was used in each experiment, gases were passed through water and oxygen filters prior to use and flow rates were 45 cm.sup.3 min.sup.1. TPR experiments were run under identical mass spectrometer and other settings to allow direct comparison of the spectra.
[0183] Results and Discussion
[0184] Powder XRD
[0185] Powder XRD patterns for all four productsCeria-S, Ceria-K, CGO-S and CGO-Kas well as the nanoparticulate CeO.sub.2 (Ceria-X) are shown in
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Summary of structural data for the four products: average crystallite size (D) from XRD line broadening; SSA and specific pore volume (V.sub.p) from gas sorption experiments; pore sizes (d.sub.p) from maxima in the BJH pore size distribution plots; pore spacings from DDPs of TEM images (d.sub.TEM) and the SAXS patterns (d.sub.SAXS). D SSA V.sub.p d.sub.p d.sub.TEM d.sub.SAXS (nm) (m.sup.2g.sup.1) (cm.sup.3g.sup.1) (nm) (nm) (nm) SBA-15 800-890 1.0-1.1 5.9-7.3 7.5-8.6 9.3 Ceria-S 34.2 85.7 0.29 2.4-3.0, 8.9-9.7 9.6-13.8 CGO-S 23.5 108.6 0.32 2.5-3.0, 8.7-9.8 9.2 11-17 KIT-6 840-990 1.2-1.4 6.4-7.2 8.9-10.5 9.6 Ceria-K 24.3 114.7 0.35 2.2-3.0, 8.5-9.4 ~8 CGO-K 22.5 137.5 0.38 2.1-2.7 9.1-9.2 8.8 ~8
[0186] Comparison experiments were conducted on a mesoporous ceria obtained using a conventional IWIT method. The IWIT mesoporous ceria had a SSA of 129 m.sup.2/g (i.e. comparable to the SSA of the Ceria-K and CGO-K materials listed in table 1), a d.sub.p value of 4-10 nm (i.e. less defined pore sizes than for Ceria-K and CGO-K) and a V.sub.p, of 0.25 cm.sup.3/g (i.e. significantly smaller than the V.sub.p of Ceria-K and CGO-K).
[0187] Chemical Composition
[0188] Using the EDS method in the TEM the Ceria products were confirmed to contain Ce and O and the CGO products Ce, O and Gd. The only impurity was Si, undoubtedly remaining from the templates, which was detected in all samples at levels of 4.5, 6.2, 6.0 and 6.3 mole % for Ceria-S, Ceria-K, CGO-S and CGO-K, respectively. EDS mapping showed no local concentrations of Si. Rather, it appeared to be distributed evenly throughout each sample, at least at the effective resolution of the instrument used (5-10 nm). Molar Ce:Gd ratios were measured to be 11:1 and 10:1 for CGO-S and CGO-K. Analysis by ICP-MS gave values of 2 to 4 mol % Si content for these samples.
[0189] Structures of SBA-15, Ceria-S and CGO-S
[0190] Gas Physisorption
[0191] Gas adsorption-desorption isotherms, and the pore size distributions (PSDs) obtained for these, are given in
[0192] The SBA-15 showed narrow peaks in the PSD at 5.9-7.3 nm (determined from the adsorption and desorption branches) indicating a good quality template. The two products each showed a sharp peak at around 2.7 nm and a broader peak centred at around 12 nm for Ceria-S and around 14 nm for CGO-S, confirming that the products were largely mesoporous.
[0193] The broad peak for both materials at around 30 nm can be assigned as interparticle porosity, and so not related to the mesopore structure. The peak at around 2.7 nm can be assigned as the pores formed in the product after removal of the walls of the template.
[0194] Taking the more reliable value of interpore spacing for SBA-15 (from SAXS) of 9.3 nm and subtracting the SBA-15 pore diameter, 5.9-7.3 nm, one arrives at a value of 2.0-3.4 nm for wall thickness in the template, which is consistent with the size of the small pores detected in the products (2.4-3.0 and 2.5-3.0 nm). This is evidence that templating was successful and that the product had taken on the inverse (or negative) structure of the template.
[0195] There are three possible explanations for the broad peaks centred on 12 and 14 nm. Firstly, bundles of loose nanorods existing outside the ordered mesopore structure may give rise to a broad peak at around this pore size. Secondly, in the mesopore product structure itself, the edges of the mesopores are accessible as long slots (in the [100] direction in
[0196] Small Angle Xray Scattering (SAXS)
[0197] In the SAXS patterns presented in
[0198] For CGO-S small peaks were evident at positions which matched those of the template. These were more evident on subtracting the background (
[0199] The absence of clear SAXS peaks for Ceria-S is discussed further below.
[0200] Electron Microscopy
[0201] The extensive and widespread ordered pore structure of the SBA-15 template is clearly seen in the images presented in
[0202] This curved structure is replicated in the image of the SBA-15-templated product, Ceria-S, in
[0203] The high resolution image in
[0204] Importantly, the two circled regions of
[0205] The extensive impregnation which has been possible in use of the method of the present invention may also give rise to larger mesoporous crystallites. Indeed, the area imaged is essentially a single crystal of mesoporous rare earth oxide material. The crystal lattice planes are visible in the image and are seen to remain parallel across the structure and between nanorods. Therefore, the bridges between nanorods must play an important role in achieving this long-range alignment of the lattice during crystallisation and grain growth.
[0206] The DDP in
[0207]
[0208] The TEM images show some variation in the width of the nanorods which define the mesopores of these materials. The resulting small variations in interpore distance and pore dimensions observed for Ceria-S may have caused scattering and line-broadening in the SAXS experiment and so may explain the absence of peaks for Ceria-S. This hypothesis is supported by a comparison with data obtained from the CGO-S material, in which the variations were generally smaller. The CGO-S material did give rise to peaks in the SAXS pattern. Doping ceria with Gd is known to aid sintering in CGO and so this may have aided the filling of the pores of the template during crystallisation and grain growth of the CGO, resulting in the slightly higher pore volume observed, and more geometrically well-defined nanorods, than in Ceria-S.
[0209] Structures of KIT-6, Ceria-K and CGO-K
[0210] Gas Physisorption
[0211] The gas adsorption-desorption isotherms and the PSD plots derived from them are presented for KIT-6and for the Ceria-K and CGO-K made using itin
[0212] For KIT-6, these values refer to a number of batches of material. As for the SBA-16, SSAs and pore volumes were very high, as expected from the literature. For the two products, SSAs and pore volumes were all significantly higher than for the corresponding materials prepared using the SBA-15 template. This may be at least partly because of SSA and pore volume being higher for KIT-6 than for SBA-15. However, it may also be a consequence of KIT-6 having a three-dimensional, rather than a one-dimensional, pore structure like SBA-15, and so facilitating precursor impregnation.
[0213] The PSD plots show KIT-6 to have a single narrow peak around 7 nm. Ceria-K and CGO-K showed sharp peaks around 2.5 nm then a poorly-defined broad feature centred on about 8 nm (clearer for CGO-K) and finally a broad peak around 25-30 nm, which can be assigned as interparticle porosity.
[0214] As above, the peaks at around 2.5 nm verify the presence of mesopores in the mesoporous rare earth oxide products, which remain after the mesoporous template has been removed.
[0215] The poorly-defined peaks around 8 nm can be explainedas aboveby interparticle porosity, the effect of short missing sections of nanorod giving rise to relatively wide pores, or to adsorption through letter-box shaped pores/openings in the structure.
[0216] It should be noted that for all products, the mesoporous structures of the resulting rare earth oxides are the negative of the mesoporous template. Accordingly, the pores are not simply spherical or cylindrical pores, but rather are complex shapes which surround the rare earth oxide nanorods and are interconnected between themselves. Hence, interpretation of the physisorption results in terms of precise pore shape and dimensions, using standard models (which assume simple pore shapes) can be difficult for these materials.
[0217] SAXS
[0218] In
[0219] Electron Microscopy
[0220] TEM images of KIT-6 showed large particles, some larger than 1 m, that contained arrays of ordered mesopores across their entirety.
[0221] TEM images of the Ceria-K and CGO-K products obtained using the KIT-6 template are presented in
[0222] The image in
[0223]
[0224] These features are clearly ordered in a hexagonal arrangement with angles between planes measured at 60. This indicates that the pore structure is viewed here along its [111] zone axis. In addition, the planes of the crystal lattice are also clearly seen.
[0225] The DDP in
[0226] TEM images showed that the CGO-K material had also been successfully prepared with widespread mesoporous structure. This is seen in
[0227] Behaviour and Properties of Mesoporous Rare Earth Oxide Materials
[0228] Reduction Behaviour
[0229] TPR spectra were obtained in flowing dilute Hydrogen by recording the water signal (m/q=18) as a function of temperature for the Ceria-X reference material and for all four products. The five spectra are presented together in
[0230] The most important change is the occurrence of one large new peak at about 520 C. (T.sub.3). A second smaller new peak (T.sub.2) also appears at around 430 C. as a shoulder on T.sub.3. Because of the size of the (T.sub.2+T.sub.3) feature and its appearance at intermediate temperatures, it is attributed to the reduction of a large amount of reactive oxygen in the mesoporous materials. Furthermore, the fact that the T.sub.4 peaks are much smaller than for the reference sample indicates that the amount of relatively unreactive oxygen is much smaller. Together, these changes mark a significant shift towards active, easily available oxygen in the mesoporous samples.
[0231] The T.sub.1 peaks are broader and much larger than for the Ceria-X reference. These properties can be explained by the combination of up to three effects. (1) the high SSAs of the mesoporous materials allow them to accommodate a large amount of surface water and the mesopore network may delay its desorption in the transient TPR experiment to above 100 C. (2) Ceria-based materials are known to be hygroscopic which would increase further the amount of water on the surfaces and may delay it's desorption to temperatures above 100 C. (3) The presence of highly reactive peroxide and superoxide species on the surface of high surface area ceria has been reported. The reduction of these at around 150 C. may contribute to the T.sub.1 peaks in the mesoporous materials.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Positions of peaks in TPR spectra ( C.) T.sub.1 T.sub.2 T.sub.3 T.sub.4 Ceria-X ~100 745 Ceria-S 125 514 712 Ceria-K 154 523 696 CGO-S 94 435 525 664 CGO-K 156 450 519 665
[0232] The TPR peak positions for all samples given in Table 2 allow a comparison of these values for all of the materials tested. Peak T.sub.1 was discussed above and peak T.sub.2 is a minor shoulder whose position is hard to determine accurately. T.sub.3 shows little variation which suggests that the corresponding reduction reactions are not sensitive to composition or to the mesopore structure.
[0233] T.sub.4 is lower for all mesoporous materials than for Ceria-X, implying that the pore structure facilitates the reduction of the bulk material. In addition, oxygen ion diffusion/conductivity in CGO is known to be greater than for undoped ceria, which is likely to favour the reduction kinetics in CGO. It is relevant, then, that T.sub.4 is lower for CGO samples than for the corresponding ceria samples.
[0234] The marked increase in reducibility of all four mesoporous products compared to a high SSA ceria is of great interest in relation to their applications as reduction and/or oxidation catalysts.
[0235] Photovoltaic (PV) Studies
[0236] PV studies were conducted to investigate ordered mesoporous ceria as a potential bulk heterojunction material for dye-sensitised solar cells.
[0237]
[0238] The PV studies were was conducted using Ceria-K. Two samples of Ceria-K were used to construct a dye-sensitised solar cell, comprising a bulk heterojunction formed from the mesoporous ceria and the dye, as described generally above.
[0239] One sample was reduced in 5% H.sub.2/Ar at 450 C. for 1 h (Ceria, reduced) before the PV studies to increase the concentration of cerium(III) ([Ce.sup.3+]), the other sample examined was untreated (Ceria, unreduced).
[0240] Two parameters were examined: the photoluminescence quenching half-life, , and the quenching efficiency, which measures the efficiency of the material to separate the exciton charges to prevent exciton annihilation. Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy is an effective technique for determining the quenching efficiency of excitons in a dye-sensitised solar cell. The sample is excited with a laser pulse, at a known frequency, creating excitons; electron-hole pairs. Some exitons recombine causing photoemission some time after the initial excitation (PL). These emitted photons are detected as a function of time, using a specially-designed detector with a temporal resolution of about 1 ps. Comparison of the energies of the laser pulse and the PL emission provides the quenching efficiency. An efficient bulk heterojunction would allow a large proportion of electrons and holes to be collected (so generating useful electrical power) before recombination, so reducing the amount of PL. Analysis of the decay of emitted PL light intensity with time gives the half-life, , of the PL of the material.
[0241] Preliminary photoluminescence experiments showed that Ceria-K quenched the excitons produced in the organic dye rapidly (
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Quenching half-life Quenching Sample (ps) efficiency (%) Reference silica 334 Reference titania 126 Ceria-K 34 90 Reduced Ceria-K 23 93
[0242] The PL experiment showed that the ordered mesoporous matrix had a great affinity for exciton quenching even though its properties had not been rigorously developed for solar cells.
[0243] As effective exciton quenching occurs if the excitons can be removed from the dye before they have time to recombine, a small distance between the dye and semiconductor of 5-20 nm is ideal. In this case, the mesoporous ceria is the semiconductor and has a half-pore width of around 1.5-2 nm. This means that these materials have the potential to increase dye-sensitised solar cell efficiencies.
[0244] Moreover, by selection of the mesoporous template used to form the materials, mesopore morphology may be tailored for the particular application, and so the material could be designed for use with a particular dye, for example. Alternatively or in addition, the oxide composition itself may be matched for a particular application, for example to optimise electron transfer from the dye.
[0245] As discussed above, the method provides for preparation of mesoporous rare earth oxide materials with greater order in the pore walls, so decreasing grain boundary resistances and improving the electrical properties, to the benefit of these photovoltaic and electrode applications.
[0246] To improve the organic dye impregnation (itself a viscous liquid when in solution because of its high Mr), and the contact with the semiconductor, vacuum impregnation could be used again.
[0247] The inventors note that ceria has an additional benefit that it absorbs ultra-violet (UV) radiation, and would therefore provide additional protection for the organic dye against UV degradation.
[0248] Thermal Resistance Studies
[0249] Materials for use in applications such as heterogeneous catalysis and fuel cells are required to be thermally stable at their operating temperatures. CGO-K was studied by heating the material to 1000 C. inside a TEM in vacuo over a period of 4 h.
[0250] CGO-S was studied by calcining the material to 500 C. and 650 C. for 48 h and 72 h, respectively, in air. These samples were then characterised using TEM and nitrogen physisorption.
[0251] In-Situ TEM Heating of CGO-K
[0252] The results for the in-situ heating experiments are presented in
[0253]
[0254] Surrounding this particle were other mesoporous particles as indicated in the image. Upon heating, it is shown that either different mesoporous particles became visible or the particles visible at room temperature rotated to present a different pore axis. The primary feature, of which DDPs were taken at each temperature, can be seen to pass from the [111] zone axis in
[0255] It was confirmed that the orientation of particles within the sample had not altered in
[0256] The ordered mesoporous materials showed high thermal stability at temperatures coinciding with the lower edge of the reduction peak (determined by TP studies to be approximately 500 C.), at which these materials could be used for redox applications such as in catalysis and SOFCs. When heated above this temperature for prolonged periods there was some evidence of sintering. However, heating in-situ in the TEM showed that over periods of ca. 4 h the materials could be heated to temperatures of up to 1000 C., and cooled down again to room temperature, without loss of structure.
[0257] It is possible that the mesoporous crystals had already grown sufficiently large that their equilibrium melting temperature made them stable at intermediate temperatures.
[0258] In contrast, the nanoparticles also present in the samples have a lower equilibrium melting temperature.
[0259] There is also some evidence from scattering experiments that the non-mesoporous by-products have been more affected by the thermal treatment than the mesoporous rare earth oxide materials.
[0260] It may be that the sintering of the by-products would cause the mass of the mesoporous crystals to rise (by Otswald ripening) and consequently equilibrium melting temperature of the sample.
[0261] Unlike all of the mesoporous ceria materials previously reported, ordered mesoporous CGO studied here (CGO-S) showed a plateau in measured SSA (see Thermal Stability below) up to approximately 500 C., across which the specific surface area decreased only by a small amount.
[0262] Thermal Stability
[0263] Previous literature reports on the thermal stability of mesoporous ceria have shown a steady decrease in the specific surface area with increasing temperature (
[0264] Note that the cause for the increase in the specific surface area in the report from Wang et al, Chemistry of Materials 14 (2002) 4676 was due to incomplete removal of the template at 200 C. At 400 C. the template had been fully removed causing the pores to become unblocked, increasing the specific surface area.
[0265] Unlike all of the mesoporous ceria materials previously reported, ordered mesoporous CGO (sample CGO-S described above) appeared to have a plateau up to approximately 500 C. where the specific surface area decreased only a small amount.
[0266] Comparing the pore volume data for CGO-S with the ceria synthesised by Lundberg et al., Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 54 (2002) 97 using P123 in cooperative self-assembly (
[0267] These initial physisorption results are consistent with the proposed annealing/sintering mechanism of the pore walls, described herein. The remaining samples, with high concentrations of nanoparticles, were more affected by lower temperatures than the ordered mesoporous material prepared in accordance with the invention, and the ordered mesoporous material appears to be capable of maintaining a high pore volume even after being subjected to high temperatures for extended periods of time.
CONCLUSIONS
[0268] In summary therefore, four mesoporous rare earth oxide materials, prepared in accordance with the present invention have been characterised in detail using powder XRD, TEM, gas physisorption, SAXS and TPR studies.
[0269] These data suggest that ordered mesoporous materials have been produced, which represent a significant improvement on established methods for preparing such materials, such as incipient wetness impregnation, as discussed above. All of the compositions and templates examined have been produced on multiple occasions at high yields, showing that the methods described herein are reproducible (Table 1).
[0270] The pore volumes of the products were determined to be high and the pore size and spacings related well to the templates from which the materials were synthesised. TEM studies confirmed that the samples had a 3D structure, this being the negative of the original template.
[0271] The materials were not only produced in high yields and high yields of mesoporous material, but also displayed relatively large regions of single crystal morphology within the pore walls.
[0272] The dimensions of the mesopore structures were successfully obtained from TEM images.
[0273] All of the mesoporous materials prepared showed dramatically increased reducibility in TPR experiments compared to a high SSA nanoparticulate ceria reference. This is very promising for their potential applications in oxidation catalysts and in SOFC components.
[0274] The thermal stability of the mesoporous rare earth oxide materials has also been demonstrated.
[0275] The photoluminescence behaviour of these materials is also promising in terms of their photovoltaic applications.