ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE SUPPRESSION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
20180065327 ยท 2018-03-08
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B29C70/885
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C70/882
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C70/82
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B29C70/88
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C70/82
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A method for manufacturing an EMI suppression device includes formulating a dielectric material from a polymer composite material that includes a thermoplastic resin /thermosetting resin and a conductive filler. A sheet that comprises the polymer composite filler is prepared. The top surface of the sheet is then laminated with a conductive foil. The laminated sheet is cut into one or more sections, where each section has a laminated top surface and a middle section that comprises the polymer composite material.
Claims
1. A method for manufacturing an electromagnetic interference (EMI) suppression device, the method comprising: formulating a dielectric material from a polymer composite material that includes a thermoplastic resin and a conductive filler; preparing a sheet that comprises the polymer composite material; laminating a top surface of the sheet with a conductive foil; and singulating the sheet into one or more sections, each section having a laminated top surface and a middle section that comprises the polymer composite material.
2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising laminating a bottom surface of the sheet with the conductive foil to thereby provide a singulated section having a laminated bottom surface.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the thermoplastic resin corresponds to poly ethane-co-tetrafluoroethane.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the conductive filler corresponds a mixture of one or more of: copper, tin, and carbon.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the conductive filler corresponds to a mixture of copper particles having a dendrite shape with a length of about 25 m and a diameter of about 5 m, and tin particles having a length of about 30 m.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein between 5% and 60% of a volume of the polymer composite material is conductive filler.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the conductive foil corresponds to a nodular metal foil.
8. An EMI suppression device comprising: a dielectric formed of polymer composite material that includes: a thermoplastic resin; and a conductive filler.
9. The EMI suppression device according to claim 8, further comprising a laminated conductive foil disposed on a top and a bottom surface of the dielectric.
10. The EMI suppression device according to claim 8, wherein the thermoplastic resin corresponds to polyethane-co-tetrafluoroethane, thermosetting epoxy.
11. The EMI suppression device according to claim 8, wherein the conductive filler corresponds a mixture of one or more of: copper, tin, carbon, a metal material and a metal ceramic material.
12. The EMI suppression device according to claim 11, wherein the conductive filler corresponds to a mixture of copper particles having a dendrite shape with a length of about 25 m and a diameter of about 5 m, and tin particles having a length of about 30 m.
13. The EMI suppression device according to claim 8, wherein between 5% and 60% of a volume of the polymer composite material is conductive filler.
14. The EMI suppression device according to claim 8, wherein the conductive filler is a nodular metal foil.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009]
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0014]
[0015] The conductive filler may correspond to a mixture of one or more of copper, tin, carbon, nickel, a different metal material and a metal ceramic material. The tin and carbon may be provided in a powder or fiber form. The copper may be provided in the form of dendrite particles, fiber particles, or powder particles. In the case of dendrite particles, the particles may have a length of about 25 m and a diameter of about 5 m. Tin particles may have a length of about 30 m. The size and shape of the different conductive particles may be adjusted as the case may be to change the electrical characteristics of the conductive filler.
[0016] In some implementations, the conductive filler may make up between about 5% and 50% of the volume of the polymer composite material.
[0017] At step 105, a sheet of polymer composite material 205 may be prepared, as illustrated in
[0018] At step 110, the top and/or bottom surfaces of the sheet of polymer composite material 205 may be laminated as illustrated in
[0019] At block 115, the sheet may be singulated. That is, the sheet may be cut into sections, where each section corresponds to an EMI suppression device, such as the exemplary EMI suppression device 215 illustrated in
[0020] The capacitance of the EMI suppression device 215 may be selected by adjusting the ratio of conductive filler material to thermoplastic or thermosetting resin in the polymer composite material 205. Table 1 below illustrates the capacitance of the EMI suppression device 215 for a 1 mm thick polymer composite material 205 of ETFE and CuSN.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 % Volume of CuSn Capacitance (nF at 1 MHz) 0 8.29 10.sup.4 10 2.77 10.sup.3 15 1.56 10.sup.2 20 1.50 10.sup.4 30 4.70 10.sup.4 40 5.60 10.sup.4
[0021] As shown, the capacitance of the EMI suppression device 215 may be changed by simply adjusting the amount of conductive filler. For example, when no conductive filler is used, the capacitance at 1 MHz may be about 8.2910.sup.4 nf. When the conductive filler is about 40% of the polymer composite material 205, the capacitance may be about 5.6010.sup.4 nf.
[0022]
[0023] The PTC device 305 includes a PTC material 315 along with top and bottom conductive surfaces or terminals 310AB. The PTC device 305 operates by allowing current flow between the top and bottom conductive surfaces when the temperature of the PTC material 315 is below an activation threshold of the PTC material 315. For example, the resistance may be below 0.05 ohm when the temperature of the PTC material 315 is below 160 C. When the temperature of the PTC material 315 exceeds the activation temperature, the resistance may abruptly increase to a resistance of about 110.sup.4 ohm or more to thereby substantially limit current flow through the PTC device 305.
[0024] As illustrated in
[0025] The resilient members 320 coupled to the EMI suppression device 215 may be coupled to a conductive surface that is in turn coupled to a ground of the power supply.
[0026] One exemplary use case for such an assembly is in a motor. For example, the load may correspond to a motor and the conductive surface 325 may correspond to a housing of the motor that is grounded. In operation, noise present on the power line to the load (VCC) generated by the motor is shunted to ground via the EMI suppression device 215.
[0027]
[0028] By contrast, a typical filter for filtering EMI noise generated by a motor usually consists of a pair of inductors in series with respective terminals of the motor and a pair of ceramic capacitors connected respectively to other ends of the inductors for shorting EMI noise generated by the motor to a common ground node.
[0029] Other advantages realized by replacing the two capacitors with a single EMI suppression device include increased cost effectiveness as compared to existing filtering solutions. For example, the cost of the EMI suppression device 215 may less than other solutions. The performance of EMI suppression device 215 is consistent in harsh environments such as at temperatures up to 110 C. The capacitance value of the of EMI suppression device 215 may be easily tailored by adjusting the proportion of conductive material in the polymer composite material. The polymer composite material of the EMI suppression device 215 is less fragile than a ceramic disk and, therefore, is easy to handle and assemble. There are no significant limitations on the size and thickness of the EMI suppression device 215.
[0030] While the method for manufacturing the electromagnetic interference suppression device has been described with reference to certain embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the spirit and scope of the claims of the application. Other modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings disclosed above without departing from the scope of the claims. Therefore, the claims should not be construed as being limited to any one of the particular embodiments disclosed, but to any embodiments that fall within the scope of the claims.