Silver-plated product

Abstract

There is provided a silver-plated product wherein a silver plating film having a thickness of not greater than 10 micrometers is formed on a base material of copper or a copper alloy and wherein the surface of the silver plating film has an arithmetic average roughness Ra of not greater than 0.1 micrometers, and the silver plating film has a {111} orientation ratio of not less than 35%.

Claims

1. A silver-plated product comprising: a base material; and a silver plating film formed on the base material, wherein a surface of the silver plating film has an arithmetic average roughness Ra of not greater than 0.1 micrometers, and the silver plating film has a {111} orientation ratio of not less than 35%.

2. A silver-plated product as set forth in claim 1, wherein said base material is made of copper or a copper alloy.

3. A silver-plated product as set forth in claim 1, wherein said silver plating film has a thickness of not greater than 10 micrometers.

4. A silver-plated product as set forth in claim 2, wherein said silver plating film has a thickness of not greater than 10 micrometers.

5. A silver-plated product as set forth in claim 1, wherein said {111} orientation ratio is 30 to 60%.

6. A silver-plated product as set forth in claim 1, wherein said {111} orientation ratio is 40 to 60%.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film of the silver-plated product in each of Examples and Comparative Examples and the {111} orientation ratio of the silver plating film thereof.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

(2) In the preferred embodiment of a silver-plated product according to the present invention, a silver plating film (of pure silver) having a thickness of not greater than 10 micrometers is formed on a base material of copper or a copper alloy. The arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film is not greater than 0.1 micrometers, and is preferably 0.03 to 0.09 micrometers. The {111} orientation ratio of the silver plating film is not less than 35%, and is preferably 40 to 60%. Even if a silver rivet is caused to slide on the silver-plated product at a load of 100 gf 300,000 times, the abrasion loss of the silver plating film (the thickness of the worn silver plating film) is less than 1 micrometer. That is, even if the thickness of the silver plating film is about 1 micrometer, after a silver rivet is caused to slide on the silver-plated product at a load of 100 gf 300,000 times, the base material of the silver-plated product is not exposed. Thus, the silver-plated product has extremely excellent wear resistance.

(3) Examples of a silver-plated product according to the present invention will be described below in detail.

EXAMPLE 1

(4) First, a pure copper plate having a size of 67 mm50 mm0.3 mm was prepared as a material to be plated. The material to be plated and a SUS plate were put in an alkali degreasing solution to be used as a cathode and an anode, respectively, to carry out electrolytic degreasing at 5 V for 30 seconds. The material thus electrolytic-degreased was washed, and then, pickled for 15 seconds in a 3% sulfuric acid. The pretreatment of the material to be plated was thus carried out.

(5) Then, the pretreated material to be plated and a titanium electrode plate coated with platinum were used as a cathode and an anode, respectively, to electroplate the material at a current density of 2.5 A/dm.sup.2 for 10 seconds in a silver strike plating solution comprising 3 g/L of silver potassium cyanide and 90 g/L of potassium cyanide while stirring the solution at 400 rpm by a stirrer. The silver strike plating was thus carried out.

(6) Then, the silver-strike-plated material to be plated and a silver electrode plate were used as a cathode and an anode, respectively, to electroplate the material at a current density of 5.0 A/dm.sup.2 and a liquid temperature of 25 C. in a silver plating solution comprising 111 g/L of silver potassium cyanide (KAg(CN).sub.2), 120 g/L of potassium cyanide and 18 mg/L of potassium selenocyanate (KSeCN) while stirring the solution at 400 rpm by a stirrer, until a silver plating film having a thickness of 3 micrometers was formed. The silver plating was thus carried out.

(7) With respect to a silver-plated product thus produced, the arithmetic average roughness Ra (which is a parameter indicating the surface roughness) of the silver plating film thereof and the {111} orientation ratio thereof were calculated, and the wear resistance thereof was evaluated.

(8) The arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film was calculated on the basis of JIS B0601 from the results of measurement at an objective magnification of 100 and a measuring pitch of 0.01 micrometers using a super-depth surface profile measuring microscope (or color laser microscope) (VK-8500 commercially available from Keyence Corporation). As a result, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film was 0.03 micrometers.

(9) The {111} orientation ratio of the silver plating film was calculated as the percentage (%) of an X-ray diffraction intensity (an integrated intensity at an X-ray diffraction peak) on {111} plane of the silver plating film with respect to the sum of values (corrected intensities) obtained by correcting X-ray diffraction intensities on {111}, {200}, {220} and {311} planes (which were main orientation modes in a silver crystal) of the silver plating film using relative intensity ratios (relative intensity ratios in the measurement of powder) described on JCPD card No. 40783, after the X-ray diffraction intensities on the {111}, {200}, {220} and {311} planes were obtained from an X-ray diffraction pattern which was obtained by carrying out the 2/ scan using an X-ray tube of Cu and the K.sub. filter method by means of a full-automatic multi-purpose horizontal X-ray diffractometer (SmartLab produced by RIGAKU Corporation). As a result, the {111} orientation ratio of the silver plating film was 41%. Furthermore, in the calculation of the {111} orientation ratio, the peak at a higher angle than that on the {311} plane was ignored to be approximated. In addition, since the X-ray diffraction intensity was varied in accordance with the orientation plane, the existing ratio of each of the orientation planes was not simply an X-ray diffraction intensity ratio on each of the orientation planes, so that the above-described relative intensity ratios were used for correcting the {111} orientation ratio.

(10) The wear resistance of the silver plating film was evaluated as follows. First, about 30 mg per an area of 8 cm.sup.2 of a grease (MULTEMP D No. 2 produced by Kyodo Yushi Co., Ltd.) was applied on the surface of the silver-plated product (wherein the silver plating film having a thickness of 3 micrometers was formed on the copper plate having a thickness of 0.3 mm) to be uniformly extended. On the surface thereof, a silver rivet (containing 89.7 wt % of Ag and 0.3 wt % of Mg and having a curvature radius of 8 mm) was caused to slide 300,000 times at a load of 100 gf and a sliding speed of 12 mm/sec by a sliding distance of 5 mm while applying a current of 500 mA thereto (assuming the actual use). After such a sliding test was carried out, the abrasion loss of the silver plating film (the thickness of the worn silver plating film) was measured for evaluating the wear resistance. As a result, the abrasion loss of the silver plating film was 0.4 micrometers.

EXAMPLE 2

(11) A silver-plated product was produced by the same method as that in Example 1, except that a silver plating solution comprising 185 g/L of silver potassium cyanide, 60 g/L of potassium cyanide and 18 mg/L of potassium selenocyanate was used for carrying out the silver plating at a liquid temperature of 18 C.

(12) With respect to a silver-plated product thus produced, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film thereof and the {111} orientation ratio thereof were calculated by the same method as that in Example 1, and the wear resistance thereof was evaluated by the same method as that in Example 1. As a result, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film was 0.03 micrometers, and the {111} orientation ratio was 43%. The abrasion loss of the silver plating film was 0.4 micrometers.

EXAMPLE 3

(13) A silver-plated product was produced by the same method as that in Example 1, except that a silver plating solution comprising 185 g/L of silver potassium cyanide, 120 g/L of potassium cyanide and 18 mg/L of potassium selenocyanate was used for carrying out the silver plating.

(14) With respect to a silver-plated product thus produced, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film thereof and the {111} orientation ratio thereof were calculated by the same method as that in Example 1, and the wear resistance thereof was evaluated by the same method as that in Example 1. As a result, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film was 0.04 micrometers, and the {111} orientation ratio was 42%. The abrasion loss of the silver plating film was 0.4 micrometers.

EXAMPLE 4

(15) A silver-plated product was produced by the same method as that in Example 1, except that a silver plating solution comprising 166 g/L of silver potassium cyanide, 100 g/L of potassium cyanide and 91 mg/L of potassium selenocyanate was used for carrying out the silver plating at a liquid temperature of 18 C.

(16) With respect to a silver-plated product thus produced, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film thereof and the {111} orientation ratio thereof were calculated by the same method as that in Example 1, and the wear resistance thereof was evaluated by the same method as that in Example 1. As a result, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film was 0.09 micrometers, and the {111} orientation ratio was 53%. The abrasion loss of the silver plating film was 0.7 micrometers.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1

(17) A silver-plated product was produced by the same method as that in Example 1, except that a silver plating solution comprising 150 g/L of silver potassium cyanide and 90 g/L of potassium cyanide was used for carrying out the silver plating at a current density of 1.2 A/dm.sup.2 and a liquid temperature of 47 C.

(18) With respect to a silver-plated product thus produced, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film thereof and the {111} orientation ratio thereof were calculated by the same method as that in Example 1, and the wear resistance thereof was evaluated by the same method as that in Example 1. As a result, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film was 0.12 micrometers, and the {111} orientation ratio was 53%. The abrasion loss of the silver plating film was 2.0 micrometers.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2

(19) A silver-plated product was produced by the same method as that in Example 1, except that a silver plating solution comprising 185 g/L of silver potassium cyanide, 120 g/L of potassium cyanide and 73 mg/L of potassium selenocyanate was used for carrying out the silver plating at a liquid temperature of 18 C.

(20) With respect to a silver-plated product thus produced, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film thereof and the {111} orientation ratio thereof were calculated by the same method as that in Example 1, and the wear resistance thereof was evaluated by the same method as that in Example 1. As a result, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film was 0.02 micrometers, and the {111} orientation ratio was 29%. The abrasion loss of the silver plating film was 1.3 micrometers.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3

(21) A silver-plated product was produced by the same method as that in Example 1, except that a silver plating solution comprising 111 g/L of silver potassium cyanide, 120 g/L of potassium cyanide and 18 mg/L of potassium selenocyanate was used for carrying out the silver plating at a current density of 2.0 A/dm.sup.2.

(22) With respect to a silver-plated product thus produced, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film thereof and the {111} orientation ratio thereof were calculated by the same method as that in Example 1, and the wear resistance thereof was evaluated by the same method as that in Example 1. As a result, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film was 0.12 micrometers, and the {111} orientation ratio was 2%. The abrasion loss of the silver plating film was 1.8 micrometers.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 4

(23) With respect to a commercially-available silver-plated product for use in automotive sliding switches, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film thereof and the {111} orientation ratio thereof were calculated, and the wear resistance thereof was evaluated. As a result, the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film was 0.21 micrometers, and the {111} orientation ratio was 40%. The abrasion loss of the silver plating film was 2.7 micrometers.

(24) The producing conditions and evaluated results of the silver-plated product in each of Examples and Comparative Examples are shown in Tables 1 and 2. FIG. 1 shows the relationship between the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film and the {111} orientation ratio of the silver plating film of the silver-plated product in each of Examples and Comparative Examples.

(25) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Liquid Current K[Ag(CN).sub.2] KCN KSeCN Temp. Density (g/L) (g/L) (mg/L) ( C.) (A/dm.sup.2) Ex. 1 111 120 18 25 5.0 Ex. 2 185 60 18 18 5.0 Ex. 3 185 120 18 25 5.0 Ex. 4 166 100 91 18 5.0 Comp. 1 150 90 0 47 1.2 Comp. 2 185 120 73 18 5.0 Comp. 3 111 120 18 25 2.0

(26) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 {111} Abrasion Ra Orientation Loss of (m) Ratio (%) Ag (m) Ex. 1 0.03 41 0.4 Ex. 2 0.03 43 0.4 Ex. 3 0.04 42 0.4 Ex. 4 0.09 53 0.7 Comp. 1 0.12 53 2.0 Comp. 2 0.02 29 1.3 Comp. 3 0.12 2 1.8 Comp. 4 0.21 40 2.7

(27) As can be seen from Table 2 and FIG. 1, in the silver-plated product in each of Examples 1 through 4 wherein the arithmetic average roughness Ra of the surface of the silver plating film is not greater than 0.1 micrometers and the {111} orientation ratio of the silver plating film is not less than 35%, the abrasion loss of the silver plating film is less than 1 micrometer after the sliding test for causing the silver rivet to slide on the silver-plated product at the load of 100 gf 300,000 times. That is, the base material of the silver-plated product is not exposed after the sliding test for causing the silver rivet to slide on the silver-plated product at the load of 100 gf 300,000 times even if the thickness of the silver plating film is about 1 micrometer. Thus, the silver-plated product in each of Examples 1 through 4 has extremely excellent wear resistance.