Multiple wire electron beam melting

Abstract

An additive manufacturing system includes an electron beam gun with a multiple of independent wire feeders and a beam control system operable to control the electron beam gun and the multiple of independent wire feeders to maintain a multiple of melt pools to fabricate a three-dimensional workpiece.

Claims

1. An additive manufacturing system, comprising: an electron beam gun; a multiple of independent wire feeders; and a beam control system operable to control said electron beam gun and said multiple of independent wire feeders to maintain a multiple of melt pools to fabricate a three-dimensional workpiece.

2. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein said electron beam gun provides a beam power in the range of from about three (3) to about sixty (60) kW.

3. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein at least one of said multiple of independent wire feeders provides a wire diameter greater than about 0.002 (0.05 mm) in diameter.

4. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein each of said multiple of independent wire feeders are operable to feed a respective wire into any location within a predefined fraction of a build envelope.

5. The system as recited in claim 4, wherein said beam control system is operable to control said electron beam gun to direct a beam into said build envelope.

6. A method of additive manufacturing comprising: feeding a wire from each of a multiple of independent wire feeders into any location within a predefined fraction of a build envelope; directing a beam from an electron beam gun into any location within a predefined fraction of a build envelope; and maintaining a multiple of melt pools to fabricate a three-dimensional workpiece.

7. The method as recited in claim 6, further comprising controlling operation of said electron beam gun and said multiple of independent wire feeders to maintain said multiple of melt pools to fabricate said three-dimensional workpiece.

8. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein said electron beam gun provides a beam power in the range of from about three (3) to about sixty (60) kW.

9. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein at least one of said multiple of independent wire feeders provides a wire diameter greater than about 0.002 (0.05 mm) in diameter.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) Various features will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the disclosed non-limiting embodiments. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:

(2) FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an additive manufacturing system; and

(3) FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a workpiece with multiple meltpools.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(4) FIG. 1 schematically illustrates an additive manufacturing system 20. The system 20 generally includes an electron beam gun 22, a multiple of independent wire feeders 24A-24n and a beam control system 26 operable to maintain a multiple of melt pools to fabricate a three-dimensional workpiece W.

(5) In one disclosed non-limiting embodiment, the electron beam gun 22 generates a focusable electron beam B with a beam power in the range of from about three (3) to about sixty (60) kW. The beam control system 26 is operable to control the electron beam gun 22 within a build envelope 28 to maintain a multiple of melt pools PA-Pn to fabricate a three-dimensional workpiece W.

(6) The multiple of independent wire feeders 24A-24n may provide a multiple of wire diameters great than about 0.002 (0.05 mm) in diameter. The multiple of independent wire feeders 24A-24n are each capable of feeding their respective wire 25A-25n into any location within a predefined fraction of the build envelope 28.

(7) In one disclosed non-limiting embodiment, the system 20 maintains the multiple of melt pools on a single horizontal plane, and the workpiece W would continuously lower, as in a powder bed approach. The high power electron beam gun 22 and the multiple of independent wire feeders 24A-24n would be stationary. Alternately, the workpiece W remains stationary, but an extra degree of freedom is provided to the high power electron beam gun 22 and the multiple of independent wire feeders 24A-24n.

(8) The system 20 facilitates the formation of small features yet increases the build rate due to the maintenance of multiple melt pools PA-Pn (FIG. 2). The multiple melt pools PA-Pn also improve the microstructure of the workpiece W due to the potential for smaller melt pool size and thus more rapid cooling. The wire feedstock from the multiple of independent wire feeders 24A-24n is also relatively less expensive than powder.

(9) Although the different non-limiting embodiments have specific illustrated components, the embodiments of this invention are not limited to those particular combinations.

(10) It is possible to use some of the components or features from any of the non-limiting embodiments in combination with features or components from any of the other non-limiting embodiments.

(11) It should be understood that relative positional terms such as forward, aft, upper, lower, above, below, and the like are with reference to the normal operational attitude of the vehicle and should not be considered otherwise limiting.

(12) It should be understood that like reference numerals identify corresponding or similar elements throughout the several drawings. It should also be understood that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom.

(13) Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present disclosure.

(14) The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within Various non-limiting embodiments are disclosed herein, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that various modifications and variations in light of the above teachings will fall within the scope of the appended claims. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the disclosure may be practiced other than as specifically described. For that reason the appended claims should be studied to determine true scope and content.