RUTHENIUM ON CHITOSAN (ChRu): CONCERTED CATALYSIS FOR WATER SPLITTING AND REDUCTION

Abstract

A process and catalyst for the in situ generation of hydrogen via the microwave irradiation of a ruthenium chitosan composite catalyst has enabled the convenient reduction of nitro compounds in aqueous medium.

Claims

1. A process for generating hydrogen and oxygen from water, the process comprising preparing a ruthenium on chitosan catalyst, bringing the catalyst into contact with an aqueous mixture under basic conditions, and applying microwave energy to the aqueous mixture to produce hydrogen and oxygen.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst is prepared by (a) suspending chitosan in water; (b) adding RuCl.sub.3.3H.sub.2O; (c) adjusting the pH of the mixture to about 8.5-9.5 while continuously stirring the mixture; (d) separating the catalyst from the liquid in the mixture; and (e) drying the mixture under a vacuum.

3. The process of claim 2 wherein the pH of the mixture is adjusted using ammonia.

4. The process of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is dried under a vacuum at a temperature from about 30-60 C.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein aqueous mixture is maintained at about 125 C. during the reaction.

6. The process of claim 5 wherein the aqueous mixture is maintained at about 125 C. for about 30 minutes during the reaction.

7. The process of claim 1 wherein K.sub.2CO.sub.3 is used to maintain basic conditions in the aqueous mixture.

8. The process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of base in the water is about 0.4 mmol/mL.

9. The process of claim 1 wherein microwave energy is applied at a power of about 100 watts for a time of about 60 to about 70 minutes.

10. The process of claim 1 wherein a nitrobenzene compound is added to the aqueous mixture prior to application of microwave energy.

11. The process of claim 10 wherein the nitrobenzene compound is 4-bromo-nitrobenzene.

12. The process of claim 11 wherein the reaction also produces a reduced organic compound.

13. The process of claim 12 wherein the reduced organic compound comprises a 4-bromo-aniline.

14. The process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of hydrogen produced is at least 4.15%.

15. The process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of hydrogen produced is at least 27.79%.

16. The process of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is separated from the liquid in the mixture using a centrifuge.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] The invention is more fully described by reference to the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings wherein:

[0016] FIG. 1 is a depiction of the Chitosan-Ruthenium (Ch-Ru) composite.

[0017] FIG. 2 shows an experimental set up to perform the MW reaction in a sealed microwave tube.

[0018] FIG. 3(a) provides an SEM image of the ChRu catalyst.

[0019] FIG. 3(b) provides an X-ray diffraction image of the ChRu catalyst.

[0020] FIG. 3(c) provides an energy dispersive spectra (EDS) of ChRu catalyst.

[0021] FIG. 3(d) provides XPS data for the ChRu catalyst.

[0022] FIG. 4 provides GC-MS data confirming the formation of p-amino phenol A.

[0023] FIG. 5 provides GS-MS data confirming the formation of diaryl either B.

[0024] FIG. 6 provides GC-MS data confirming the formation of nitro reduced diaryl either C.

[0025] FIG. 7 provides GC-MS data showing the reduction of nitro group under MW heating conditions exclusively in basic media.

[0026] FIG. 8 provides GC-MS Head Space Analysis data showing the hydrogen concentration produced with the catalyst of the invention, suspended in aqueous K.sub.2CO.sub.3, was exposed to microwave heating for 30 minutes.

[0027] FIG. 9 provides GC-MS Head Space Analysis GC-MS Head Space Analysis data showing the hydrogen concentration produced under the same conditions as in FIG. 8 but using a different base.

[0028] FIG. 10 provides GC-MS Head Space Analysis data showing the hydrogen concentration produced under the same conditions as in FIG. 8 but using a different base.

[0029] FIG. 11 provides GC-MS Head Space Analysis data showing the hydrogen concentration produced under the same conditions as in FIG. 8 but using a different base.

[0030] FIG. 12 provides GC-MS Head Space Analysis data showing the hydrogen concentration produced under the same conditions as in FIG. 8 but using a different base.

[0031] FIG. 13 provides GC-MS Head Space Analysis data showing the hydrogen concentration produced under the same conditions as in FIG. 8 but using a different base.

[0032] FIG. 14 provides GC-MS Head Space Analysis data showing the hydrogen concentration produced under the same conditions as in FIG. 8 but using a different base.

[0033] FIG. 15 provides GC-MS Head Space Analysis data showing the hydrogen concentration produced under the same conditions as in FIG. 8 but using a different base.

[0034] FIG. 16 provides GC-MS Head Space Analysis data showing the hydrogen concentration produced under the same conditions as in FIG. 8 using a lower concentration of K.sub.2CO.sub.3.

[0035] FIG. 17 provides GC-MS Head Space Analysis data showing the hydrogen concentration produced under the same conditions as in FIG. 8 but at a lower temperature (100 C. vs. 125 C.).

[0036] FIG. 18 is a depiction of a Chitosan-Fe (ChFe) composite.

[0037] FIG. 19 is a depiction of a Chitosan-Pd (ChPd) composite.

[0038] FIG. 20 is a depiction of a Cellulose-Fe (CelluFe) composite.

[0039] FIG. 21 is a depiction of a Cellulose-Pd (CelluPd) composite.

[0040] FIG. 22 is a depiction of a Cellulose-Ru (CelluRu) composite.

[0041] FIG. 23 is a depiction of water splitting and nitro compound reduction reactions on a Chitosan-Ruthenium (Ch-Ru) composite catalyst.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0042] Referring more specifically to the drawings, FIG. 1 is a structural representation of the Chitosan-Ru composite catalyst prepared by the inventors. The Chitosan-Ru catalyst has been characterized by SEM (FIG. 3(a)) and X-ray diffraction (XRD)(FIG. 3(b)). The signals pertaining to the Ru metal were not detected in the XRD data, possibly due to complexation with chitosan or its low percentage. However, the presence of the Ru-metal has been confirmed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (FIG. 3(c)). XPS analysis of ChRu was performed to analyze the oxidation state of the Ru metal; the binding energy peak for Ru 3d.sub.5/2 at 282.5 eV is in accordance with Ru.sub.(III) (XPS, FIG. 3(d)). The weight percentage of Ru was found to be 6.41% by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) analysis.

[0043] While demonstrating the application of ruthenium chitosan composite ChRu in CO aryl bond formation in aqueous media (Scheme 2), the inventors observed the formation of three products: p-amino phenol A (FIG. 4), expected diaryl ether B (FIG. 5) and nitro reduced diaryl ether C (FIG. 6). The detection of reduced nitro group to amine in the product mixture was unexpected, which in turn prompted the inventors to investigate how the reduction of nitro group is feasible under these conditions.

##STR00001##

[0044] The study was undertaken with 4-bromo-nitro-benzene as a model substrate in order to find out the best possible conditions for the reduction reaction. The reduction of nitro group occurs under MW heating conditions exclusively in basic media (See Table 1, FIG. 7).

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Screening for the catalytic reduction of nitro group [00002] Entry Catalyst Base Temp Product Yield.sup.[a] 1 No catalyst 125 C. 0% 2 RuCh (25 mg) 125 C. 0% 3 RuCh (25 mg) K.sub.2CO.sub.3 125 C. 0% 4 RuCh (25 mg) 125 C./MW 0% 5 RuChH (25 mg) K.sub.2CO.sub.3 125 C./MW 89%.sup.b .sup.[a]Reaction condition: 4-Nitro-bromobenzene (1 mmol), RuCh-catalyst (25 mg), K.sub.2CO.sub.3 (2 mmol), Water 5 mL, MW, 125 C., 30 min; .sup.bGC Conversion

[0045] After optimizing the reaction conditions that provided an ideal environment for reduction, the inventors searched for the source of the nitro reduction. Their studies led them to hypothesize that hydrogen may be generated in-situ in the reaction mixture, which could be responsible for the reduction of the nitro group. The hydrogen evolution through splitting of water is possible through use of a specially designed, sophisticated and highly conjugated ruthenium metal complex under photochemical conditions. In order to detect the generation of hydrogen in the reaction mixture, the inventors designed an experimental set up to perform the MW reaction in a sealed tube (see FIG. 2). The design and accompanying conditions prevent the escape of hydrogen gas. The head space analysis of the sealed tube after the reaction would help to identify the gaseous atmosphere over the reaction mixture.

[0046] Accordingly, the inventors carried out experiments and studied the head space atmosphere. The head space analysis after the reaction was encouraging, as the inventors observed that substantial percentages of hydrogen were detected (27%) (Table 2). Under neutral conditions, no splitting of water was discerned even after prolonged exposure to MW, UV-visible light and conventional heating (Table 2, entries 1-4). However, when the catalyst, suspended in aqueous K.sub.2CO.sub.3, was exposed to MW heating for 30 min, 27.79% of hydrogen (Table 2, entry 8) was detected in head space analysis (FIG. 8). The experiments were set-up to screen the different bases and their effect on water splitting. Use of Cs.sub.2CO.sub.3 as a base results in 4.15% of hydrogen (Table 2, entry 9, FIG. 9), whereas NaHCO.sub.3, Na.sub.2CO.sub.3 and NaOH provided 0.79% hydrogen (Table 2, entry 10, FIG. 10), 1.22% hydrogen (Table 2, entry 11, FIG. 11) and 7.39% hydrogen (Table 2, entry 12, FIG. 12), respectively, after head space analysis. Other bases, namely KOH, KHCO.sub.3 and K.sub.3PO.sub.4, generated 3.84% (Table 2, entry 13, FIG. 13), 1.28% (Table 2, entry 14, FIG. 14) and 1.90% (Table 2, entry 15, FIG. 15) of hydrogen under similar conditions. However, when the concentration of K.sub.2CO.sub.3 was reduced from 2 mmol in 5 mL water to 1 mmol in 5 mL water there was a sharp decline in the hydrogen percentage from 27.79% to 2.26% (Table 2, entry 16, FIG. 16). The MW exposure at the reduced temperature of 100 C. directly impacts the efficiency of water splitting, thereby reducing the hydrogen percentage to 0.15% (Table entry 17, FIG. 17). In basic media using K.sub.2CO.sub.3, no hydrogen was detected under conventional heating or UV-Visible light exposure (Table 2, entries 5-7). Having confirmed K.sub.2CO.sub.3 as an ideal base and its appropriate concentration for water splitting under MW, the use of alternative biorenewable support such as cellulose and other metals such as iron and palladium were explored.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 ChRu-catalyzed water splitting under MW Entry Catalyst Base Time/Temp Energy source % Hydrogen.sup.[a] 1 ChRu 60 min/125 C. MW 0% 2 ChRu 24 h/ambient temp UV 0% 3 ChRu 24 h/ambient temp Visibile light 0% 4 ChRu 24 h/125 C. oil bath 0% 5 ChRu K.sub.2CO3 24 h/ambient temp UV 0% 6 ChRu K.sub.2CO3 24 h/ambient temp Visibile light 0% 7 ChRu K.sub.2CO3 24 h/125 C. oil bath 0% 8 ChRu K.sub.2CO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. MW 27.79% 9 ChRu Cs.sub.2CO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. MW 4.15% 10 ChRu NaHCO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. MW 0.79% 11 ChRu Na.sub.2CO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. MW 1.22% 12 ChRu NaOH 30 min/125 C. MW 7.39% 13 ChRu KOH 30 min/125 C. MW 3.84% 14 ChRu KHCO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. MW 1.28% 15 ChRu K.sub.3PO.sub.4 30 min/125 C. MW 1.90% 16.sup.b ChRu K.sub.2CO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. MW 2.26% 17.sup.c ChRu K.sub.2CO.sub.3 30 min/100 C. MW 0.15% .sup.[a]Reaction conditions: Base (2 mmol), water (5 mL); .sup.b1 mmol of K.sub.2CO.sub.3, water (5 mL), MW, 125 C.; .sup.cReaction was performed at 100 C., using 2 mmol of K.sub.2CO.sub.3 in 5 mL of water.

[0047] The microwave irradiation of ChFe, ChPd, CelluFe, CelluPd, CelluRu, (see FIGS. 18-22, respectively) under basic media, using K.sub.2CO.sub.3 as a base was performed without a detectable presence of hydrogen in the head space analysis (Table S1).

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE S1 Screeing of water splitting using Fe, Pd and alternative biopolymer Hydro- Entry Catalyst Base Time/Temp Energy source gen.sup.a,b 1 CelluRu K.sub.2CO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. Microwave 0.00% 2 CelluPd (II) K.sub.2CO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. Microwave 0.00% 3 CelluFe(III) K.sub.2CO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. Microwave 0.00% 4 ChFe(III) K.sub.2CO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. Microwave 0.00% 5 ChPd (II) K.sub.2CO.sub.3 30 min/125 C. Microwave 0.00% .sup.aReaction condition: K.sub.2CO.sub.3 (2 mmol), Water (5 mL), MW, Metal catalyst (25 mg). .sup.bPercentage after Head space analysis

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE S2 Recycling of ChRu catalyst in nitro reduction Entry Substrate Time Product Conversion.sup.[a],[b] Cycle 1 [00003] 60 min [00004] >99% Cycle 2 [00005] 60 min [00006] >99% Cycle 3 [00007] 60 min [00008] >99% Cycle 4 [00009] 60 min [00010] >99% Cycle 5 [00011] 60 min [00012] >99% .sup.[a]Reaction condition: 1 mmol of 4-nitro bromobenzene, 2 mmol of K.sub.2CO.sub.3, ChRu (25 mg), 5 mL water, MW, 125 C., 60 min; .sup.[b]GC conversion

##STR00013##

[0048] The selective reduction of nitro compounds to amines is one of the very important transformations in organic synthesis, and consequently there are number of procedures for the reduction of nitro compounds (Scheme 3). Due to concern for the environment, the search for simple, chemo-selective, affordable and environmentally benign methods that avoid the use of hazardous and expensive reducing agents in stoichiometric amounts has gained prime importance. The use of a binary mixture of CO and H.sub.2O as a hydrogen source along with specially designed Rh, Au or Ru metal complex catalysts has been considered as one of the most useful methods for nitro reduction. The in-situ generation of hydrogen from water and its utilization in reduction of nitro compounds using simple biodegradable renewable chitosan has never been reported (see bottom, Scheme 3).

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 3 ChRu catalyzed reduction of nitro compund. Entry Substrate Time Product Conversion.sup.[a],[b] 1 [00014] 60 min [00015] >99% 2 [00016] 60 min [00017] >99% 3 [00018] 60 min [00019] >99% 4 [00020] 70 min [00021] >99% 5 [00022] 70 min [00023] >99% 6 [00024] 60 min [00025] >99% .sup.[a]Reaction condition: 1 mmol of nitro compound, 2 mmol of K.sub.2CO.sub.3, ChRu (25 mg), 5 mL water, MW, 125 C., 60-70 min; .sup.[b]GC conversion

[0049] The experimental procedure entailed placing aromatic nitro compound (1 mmol) into a microwave reaction tube, to which K.sub.2CO.sub.3 (2 mmol), ChRu (25 mg) and 5 mL of water were added and exposed to microwave irradiation for 60-70 min at 125 C. The reaction was monitored using GCMS. In almost all the cases, the nitro group is selectively reduced to the corresponding amine (Table 3).

[0050] The recovery of the catalyst is the most important goal in a sustainable organic synthesis. In industrial application of heterogeneous system, the lifetime of the catalyst and its level of reusability are significantly important factors. To demonstrate recyclability of ruthenium chitosan composite, a set of experiments was conducted for the hydrogenation of 4-nitro bromo benzene using the recycled ChRu catalyst. After the completion of the reaction, the catalyst was recovered, washed with acetone, and dried under vacuum. A fresh reaction was then set-up using fresh reactants and recycled catalyst and subjected to MW irradiation. The ChRu catalyst could be used at least five times without any change in its activity. Metal leaching was studied using ICP-AES analysis of the catalyst before and after the completion of the reaction. The Ru concentration was found to be 6.41% before the reaction and 6.35% after the reaction. The very small amount of Ru metal was detected in the aqueous mixture. The negligible amount of Ru leaching may be due to the well-defined structure of chitosan with its abundance of amine and hydroxyl functional groups. While it is only theory, chitosan's advantageous structural characteristics may result in Ru chelating via non-covalent interaction.

Examples

Experimental Procedure for Synthesis of Chitosan Ruthenium Catalyst (ChRu)

[0051] The Ruthenium on Chitosan catalyst was made as follows. Chitosan (3 g, medium molecular weight, Aldrich, CSA #9012-76-4) was suspended in 100 mL of water. To this suspension, 500 mg of RuCl.sub.3.3H.sub.2O was added. The pH was adjusted to 9 using 25% ammonia, and the suspension was continuously stirred overnight. The catalyst was separated using a centrifuge operated at 5000 rpm for 5 minutes. The catalyst was then dried under vacuum at 50 C. for about 2 hours to about 3 hours.

Reduction of Nitro Group

[0052] Nitro compound (e.g., the aromatic nitro compound, 4-bromonitrobenzene, 1.0 mmol), ChRu (25 mg, 0.015, mol %) and K.sub.2CO.sub.3 (2 mmol) were placed in a crimp-sealed thick-walled glass tube equipped with a pressure sensor and a magnetic stirrer. Water (5 mL) was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction tube was placed inside the cavity of a CEM Discover focused microwave synthesis system and operated at 125 C. (temperature monitored by a built-in infrared sensor) and 100 Watts for 60-70 minutes. After completion of the reaction, the catalyst was removed from the reaction mixture using a centrifuge. Reduction of the nitro group has been monitored using GCMS. The clear liquid was cooled slowly, and, in most cases, an analytically pure sample of corresponding amine was obtained. The samples can be isolated from the water medium by simple decantation.

[0053] In brief, the inventors have demonstrated the unprecedented use of pure water as a hydrogen source in the catalytic hydrogenation of nitro compounds wherein ruthenium chitosan composite can split water under microwave irradiation conditions. See FIG. 23. Ruthenium chitosan composite performs a dual action of producing hydrogen and subsequently catalyzing the reduction of nitro groups to amine under MW irradiation. As a result of this invention, low energy MW has been shown to assist in weakening the OH bound in water molecules, which results in instigating the splitting of water into hydrogen. These findings may pave the way for the future the expansion of microwave-assisted chemistry in concerted reactions such as hydrogen production from water and hydrogenation.

[0054] As the present invention may be embodied in several forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof, it will be understood that the invention is not limited by the details of the foregoing description, unless otherwise specified, but rather should be construed broadly within its spirit and scope as defined in the appended claims, and therefore all changes and modifications that fall within the metes and bounds of the claims. Accordingly, the invention is defined by the appended claims.

REFERENCES

[0055] [1]. R. E. Blankenship, Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K., 2002. [0056] [2]. H. J. Lewerenz, L. Peter, Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Materials, Processes and Architectures, The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013. [0057] [3]. R. V. D. Krol, M. Gratzel, Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production, Springer Science, 2012. [0058] [4]. T. Hisatomi, J. Kubota, K. Domen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60378D [0059] [5]. A. Kudo, Y. Miseki, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 253-278. [0060] [6]. J. J. Concepcion, J. W. Jurss, M. K. Brennaman, P. G. Hoertz, A. O. T. Patrocinio, N. Y. Murakami, J. L. Templeton, T. J. Meyer, Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1954-1965. [0061] [7]. S. Romain, L. Vigara, A. Llobet, Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1944-1953. [0062] [8]. G. S. Parkinson, Z. Novotny, P. Jacobson, M. Schmid, U. Diebold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 12650-12655. [0063] [9]. R. H. Gonalves, B. H. R. Lima, E. R. Leite, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 6012-6019. [0064] [10]. M. Higashi, K. Domen, R. Abe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 6968-6971. [0065] [11]. M. T. Mayer, C. Du, D. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 12406-12409. [0066] [12]. J. Cohen, K. Kim, M. L. Ghirardi, K. Schulten, M. Seibert, P. King, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005, 33, 80-82. [0067] [13]. A. S. Fedorov, S. Kosourov, M. Seibert, M. L. Ghirardi, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 403-412. [0068] [14]. G. Sirasani, L. Tong, and E. P. Balskus, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7785-7788 [0069] [15]. L. Vigh, D. A. Los, I. Horv_th, N. Murata, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 9090-9094. [0070] [16]. X. H. Li, X. Wang, M. Antonietti, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 2170 [0071] [17]. K. S. Joya, Y. F. Joya, K. Ocakoglu, R. V. Krol, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 10426-10437. [0072] [18]. R. B. Nasir Baig, R. S. Varma Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 752-770. [0073] [19]. R. B. Nasir Baig, B. R. Vaddula, M. A. Gonzalez, R. S. Varma, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 9103-9106. [0074] [20]. R. B. Nasir Baig, M. N. Nadagouda, R. S. Varma, Green Chem., 2014, 16, 2122-2127. [0075] [21]. X. Yang, M. B. Hall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 120-130 [0076] [22]. M. J. Krische, Y. Sun, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40, 1237-1237. [0077] [23]. I. Sorribes, G. Wienhcfer, C. Vicent, K. Junge, Rosa Lusar, M. Beller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7794-7798. [0078] [24]. D. Cantillo, M. Baghbanzadeh, C. O. Kappe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10190-10193. [0079] [25]. L. He, L. C. Wang, H. Sun, J. Ni, Y. Cao, H. Y. He, K. N. Fan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9538-9541. [0080] [26]. C. O. Kappe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2-7 [0081] [27]. G. B. Dudley, A. E. Stiegman, M. R. Rosana, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2-8.