Process and device for desulphurization and denitration of flue gas
09895661 ยท 2018-02-20
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C01B21/20
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01D53/1493
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/60
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/1481
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/18
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D2257/404
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y02P20/129
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
B01D53/96
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/1425
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01D53/18
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C01B21/20
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01D53/74
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/96
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The invention discloses a process and device for desulfurization-denitration of a flue gas. A desulfurization-denitration solution is used in an absorption tower to absorb sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides from the flue gas or various combustion tail (waste) gases. The desulfurization-denitration solution with absorbed sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides releases the sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides by heating and/or gas stripping and/or vacuum regeneration in a regeneration tower. The released sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides are further concentrated into a sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxide product with a higher purity in a concentration tower. The regenerated desulfurization-denitration solution is recycled for use. The process and device have a wide range of industrial applications, and can be used for desulfurization and/or denitration of flue gases, incineration gases, coke-oven gases, synthetic waste gases from dyestuff plants, pollutant gases discharged from chemical fiber plants and other industrial raw material gases or waste gases containing SOx.
Claims
1. A flue gas desulfurization-denitration process, comprising the following procedures: 1) afterheat recovery procedure: the temperature of the flue gas is lowered to below 50 C. in a heat exchange recovering way, and afterheat recovery is carried out; 2) desulfurization-denitration procedure: the cooled flue gas enters into an absorption tower, sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides therein are absorbed by a desulfurization-denitration solution, and the said desulfurization-denitration solution is a composite solution containing polyol and/or polymeric polyol; 3) regeneration procedure of desulfurization-denitration solution: in a regeneration tower, the desulfurization-denitration solution with absorbed sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides releases the sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides by ways of heating and/or gas stripping and/or vacuum regeneration, and the desulfurization-denitration solution after regeneration is recycled for use; 4) sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides concentration procedure: in a concentration tower, sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides released by the regeneration procedure of the desulfurization-denitration solution are concentrated into a product of sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides with a higher purity.
2. The said flue gas desulfurization-denitration process according to claim 1, characterized in that, a way of direct heat exchange recovery or a way of simultaneous indirect-direct heat exchange recovery is used by the afterheat recovery procedure.
3. The said flue gas desulfurization-denitration process according to claim 2, characterized in that, in the afterheat recovery procedure, the flue gas is brought into direct contact with a heat storage fluid for heat exchange, and the circulation volume of the heat storage fluid is increased by providing one or more stages of internal circulation pumps.
4. The said flue gas desulfurization-denitration process according to claim 1, characterized in that, in the desulfurization-denitration procedure, the circulation volume of the desulfurization-denitration solution is increased by providing one or more stages of internal circulation pumps.
5. The said flue gas desulfurization-denitration process according to claim 1, characterized in that, the regeneration procedure of said desulfurization-denitration solution is specifically as follows: the desulfurization-denitration solution with absorbed sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides from the flue gas is a desulfurization-denitration rich solution, which is first subjected to indirect heat exchange with a desulfurization-denitration lean solution flowing out of the bottom of the regeneration tower, and is heated to above 90 C., and then enters from the upper end of the regeneration tower to desorb the sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides by heating and/or gas stripping and/or vacuum regeneration, and turns into the desulfurization-denitration lean solution, which flows out of the bottom of the regeneration tower, is subjected to heat exchange and cooling to below 50 C., and then is sent to the desulfurization-denitration procedure for recycle use.
6. The said flue gas desulfurization-denitration process according to claim 1, characterized in that, the sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides concentration procedure is specifically as follows: a mixed gas released by the regeneration procedure of desulfurization-denitration solution, which contains sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides, enters from the middle section of the concentration tower, contacts with the condensed water from the top of the concentration tower in a counter-current way to condense water vapor in the mixed gas, the mixed gas with water vapor removed flows out of the top of the concentration tower; water vapor enters from the bottom end of the concentration tower, contacts with the condensed water in a counter-current way, residual sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides in the condensed water are extracted by the water vapor, so as to turn the condensed water into distilled water, which flows out of the bottom of the concentration tower and is recycled.
7. A flue gas desulfurization-denitration device, comprising an afterheat recovery tower, an absorption tower, a regeneration tower and a concentration tower, wherein: The afterheat recovery tower: is used for heat exchange between the flue gas and a heat storage fluid, lowering the temperature of the flue gas to below 50 C., and carrying out afterheat recovery; The absorption tower: is used for direct contact of the cooled flue gas with a desulfurization-denitration solution, the desulfurization-denitration solution absorbs sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides in the flue gas and turns into a desulfurization-denitration rich solution, and then is discharged from the absorption tower; the said desulfurization-denitration solution is a composite solution containing polyol and/or polymeric polyol; The regeneration tower: is used for the desulfurization-denitration rich solution to desorb sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides by heating and/or gas stripping and/or vacuum regeneration and turn into a desulfurization-denitration lean solution, the desulfurization-denitration lean solution obtained by regeneration is sent back to the absorption tower for recycle use; The concentration tower: is used for removing, by condensation, water vapor from a mixed gas comprising sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides, which is released from the regeneration tower, sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides are condensed into a product of sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides with a higher purity.
8. The said flue gas desulfurization-denitration device according to claim 7, characterized in that, the said afterheat recovery tower is provided with one or more stages of internal circulation pumps for increasing the circulation volume of the heat storage fluid.
9. The said flue gas desulfurization-denitration device according to claim 7, characterized in that, the said absorption tower is provided with one or more stages of internal circulation pumps for increasing the circulation volume of the desulfurization-denitration solution.
10. The said flue gas desulfurization-denitration device according to claim 7, characterized in that, a heat exchanger is provided between the said absorption tower and the regeneration tower, and the desulfurization-denitration rich solution from the absorption tower and the desulfurization-denitration lean solution flowing out of the regeneration tower are subjected to indirect heat exchange through the heat exchanger.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1)
(2) In
(3)
(4) In
(5)
(6) In
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(7) The flue gas desulfurization-denitration process and device of the present invention will be described below in conjunction with specific embodiments. The embodiments are intended to better illustrate the present invention, and should not be construed as limiting the claims of the present invention.
(8) The operation methods are as follows:
(9) The operation methods of the processes and devices for the flue gas desulfurization-denitration, the regeneration of the desulfurization-denitration solution and the concentration of sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides are shown in
(10) The process and operation methods of devices for the way of direct heat exchange recovery in the flue gas afterheat recovery are shown in
(11) The process and operation methods of devices for the way of heat recovery of simultaneous direct-indirect heat exchange in the flue gas afterheat recovery are shown in
(12) According to the processes and devices for the flue gas desulfurization-denitration, the regeneration of the desulfurization-denitration solution and the concentration of sulfur dioxide and/or nitrogen oxides shown in
(13) Specifications for absorption tower 3: 2194, total height 7.2 m, 4-layer packing, each 1 m high, material 316L stainless steel;
(14) Specifications for lean solution tank 11: 4503, total height 2.0 m, material 316L stainless steel;
(15) Cooler 13: 1593, tube 101, length 1.5 m, total heat exchange area 3.9 m.sup.2, material 316L stainless steel;
(16) Heat exchanger 14: 1593, 2 units, tube 101, length 1.5 m, heat exchange area 23.9 m.sup.2, 2193, 1 unit, tube 61, length 1.4 m, heat exchange area 9.63 m.sup.2, total heat exchange area 23.9+9.63=17.43 m.sup.2, material 316L stainless steel;
(17) Rich solution heater 17: 1593, tube 321, length 0.9 m, total heat exchange area 1.63 m.sup.2, material titanium;
(18) Specifications for regeneration tower 20: 2194, total height 5.57 m, upper section with one layer of packing 1.5 m high, lower end empty tower, material 316L stainless steel;
(19) Specifications for concentration tower 23: 1594, total height 6.2 m, upper end titanium tube condenser, middle section with one layer of packing 1.5 m high, lower section with one layer of packing 2.0 m high, material 316L stainless steel.
(20) Booster fan 2: Model 2HB710-AH37, air volume 318 m.sup.3/hr, air pressure 290390 mbar (29 kPa39 kPa), Shanghai Likai Mechanical & Electrical device Co., Ltd.;
(21) Internal circulation pump 4: Model IHG20-125, flow 4.0 m.sup.3/hr, head 20 m, 0.75 KW, 3 units, material 316L stainless steel, Shanghai Changshen Pump Manufacturing Co., Ltd.;
(22) Rich solution pump 9, desulfurization pump 10 and lean solution pump 12: models are the same IHG25-160, flow 4.0 m.sup.3/hr, head 32 m, 1.5 KW, 1 unit for each, material 316L stainless steel, Shanghai Changshen Pump Manufacturing Co., Ltd.;
(23) Distilled water pump 24: all models WB50/037D, flow 1.2 m.sup.3/hr, head 14.5 m, 0.37 KW, 1 unit, material 316L stainless steel, Guangdong Yongli Pump Co., Ltd.;
(24) Flue gas flowmeter: Model LZB-50 glass rotor flowmeter, measuring range 50-250 m.sup.3/hr, Jiangyin Keda Instrument Factory;
(25) Desulfurization-denitration solution flowmeter: rich solution pump, lean solution pump and desulfurization pump outlet liquid flowmeter, LZB-32 S glass pipeline flowmeter, measuring range: 0.4-4 m.sup.3/hr, Jiangyin Keda Instrument Factory;
(26) The outlet liquid flowmeter of internal circulation pump in absorption tower: Model LZB-25 S glass pipeline flowmeter, measuring range 0.36-3.6 m.sup.3/hr, 3 units, Jiangyin Keda Instrument Factory;
(27) Steam flowmeter (for gas stripping regeneration tower): Model LUGB-2303-P2 vortex shedding flowmeter, measuring range: 8-80 m.sup.3/hr, Beijing Bangyu Chengxin Industrial Technology Development Co., Ltd.;
(28) Steam flowmeter (for concentration tower): Model GHLUGB-25 vortex shedding flowmeter, measuring range: 10-60 m.sup.3/hr, Tianjin Guanghua Kaite Flow Meter Co., Ltd.;
(29) For the inlet and outlet gases of absorption tower 3 as well as the desorbed gases from the concentration tower 23, all ingredients were subjected to on-line analysis by continuous flue gas analyzer, wherein the contents of SO.sub.2, NO and O.sub.2 were analyzed by UV-light JNYQ-I-41 type gas analyzer; the content of CO.sub.2 was analyzed by JNYQ-I-41C type infrared gas analyzer, manufactured by Xi'an Juneng Instrument Co., Ltd.; At the same time, the contents of SO.sub.2, NO and CO.sub.2 in a gas were analyzed and calibrated by chemical analysis, and compared with values of instrumental analysis, in which: the content of SO.sub.2 in a gas was analyzed by iodometric method, the content of CO.sub.2 in a gas was analyzed by barium chloride method, and the content of NO in a gas was analyzed by naphthyl ethylenediamine hydrochloride colorimetric method.
(30) The contents of SO.sub.2, NO and CO.sub.2 in desulfurization-denitration lean solution 7, desulfurization-denitration rich solution 8 and distilled water 26 were analyzed by chemical method, in which: the content of SO.sub.2 in a solution was analyzed by iodometric method, the content of CO.sub.2 in a solution was analyzed by barium chloride method, and the content of NO in a solution was analyzed by naphthyl ethylenediamine hydrochloride colorimetric method.
(31) Gas mixing was performed with air, SO.sub.2, NO and CO.sub.2, the gas ingredients are shown in tables of the test data.
(32) According to our patent technologies, the following desulfurization-denitration solutions were formulated:
(33) 1. 15% Na.sub.2SO.sub.3 (w) aqueous solution;
(34) 2. 20% monopotassium citrate (w) aqueous solution;
(35) 3. EG solution;
(36) 4. PEG400 solution;
(37) 5. PEG400+3% triethanolamine (w) solution;
(38) 6. NHD solution (a mixture of polyethylene glycol dimethyl ethers with a degree of polymerization of 4-8);
(39) 7. 60% EG (w)+30% H.sub.2O (w)+10% monosodium citrate (w) solution;
(40) 8. 60% PEG400 (w)+30% H.sub.2O (w)+10% monosodium citrate (w) solution;
(41) 9. 30% EG (w)+30% PEG400 (w)+30% H.sub.2O (w)+10% monosodium citrate (w) solution.
(42) Using these desulfurization-denitration solutions, desulfurization-denitration tests were carried out on the desulfurization-denitration apparatus made and installed as shown in
(43) Tests results showed that:
(44) 1. When the desulfurization-denitration was carried out by using 15% Na.sub.2SO.sub.3 (w) aqueous solution, 20% monopotassium citrate (w) aqueous solution, EG solution and PEG400 solution, respectively, initially the solution had a relatively strong absorption capacity for sulfur dioxide, with an absorption rate of 90% or more, but had no absorption capacity for nitrogen oxides. However, after 2 to 5 days of continuous operation, the solution gradually lost its ability to absorb sulfur dioxide, the solution gradually changed in nature, and the solution could not be regenerated when heated to above 120 C.
(45) 2. When the desulfurization-denitration was carried out using PEG400+3% triethanolamine (w) solution and NHD solution, respectively, initially the solution had a relatively strong absorption capacity for sulfur dioxide, with an absorption rate above 90%, absorption capacity for nitrogen oxides also reached 50% or so, However, after 5 to 10 days of continuous operation, the solution gradually turned brownish black, absorption capacities for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides were reduced to 50% and 20% or so, respectively, the solution gradually changed in nature, and a viscous black gelatineous material was produced.
(46) 3. When the desulfurization-denitration was carried out using 60% EG (w)+30% H.sub.2O (w)+10% monosodium citrate (w) solution, 60% PEG400 (w)+30% H.sub.2O (w)+10% monosodium citrate (w) solution and 30% EG (w)+30% PEG400 (w)+30% H.sub.2O (w)+10% monosodium citrate (w) solution, respectively, the solution had a relatively strong absorption capacity for sulfur dioxide, with an absorption rate up to 90-100%, and absorption capacity for nitrogen oxides was 40-80%. After 90 days of continuous operation, absorption capacities for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides were unchanged, removal efficiencies for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides were stable, and no changes of nature of the solution were found. Some running test data were extracted therefrom, and listed in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.
(47) It was seen from the test results that, there were little differences among the desulfurization-denitration effects of 60% EG(w)+30% H.sub.2O (w)+10% monosodium citrate (w) solution, 60% PEG400 (w)+30% H.sub.2O (w)+10% monosodium citrate (w) solution and 30% EG (w)+30% PEG400 (w)+30% H.sub.2O (w)+10% monosodium citrate (w) solution. The effects were quite ideal, and the solutions were relatively stable.
(48) The test results indicate that, we formerly submitted patent applications Method for removing SOx from gas using modified polyethylene glycol (Application No. 201310409296.8), Method for removing SOx from gas using composite alcohol amine solution (Application No. 201310481557.7), Method for removing SOx from gas using ethylene glycol composite solution (Application No. 201310682799.2), Method for removing SOx from gas using polyol composite solution (Application No. 201310682382.6), and the like, the desulfurization solution taught therein not only has the ability of removing sulfur dioxide from gas, but also has the ability of absorbing nitrogen oxides in the gas. In particular, by adding a small amount of additives containing sulfoxide and/or sulfone group (such as DMSO and/or sulfolane, or hydroxyl and/or carboxyl substitutes thereof) to such solution, the ability of the solution to absorb nitrogen oxides increases greatly. Therefore, the use of these solutions in the said process and device of the present invention allows for large-scale industrialized desulfurization and denitration of flue gas and/or waste gas.
(49) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Operation data for the case where 60% EG (w) + 30% H.sub.2O (w) + 10% monosodium citrate (w) solution worked as desulfurization-denitration solution (excerpts from May, 6 to 14, 2014) Time 22:30 13:30 13:30 13:30 13:30 13:30 13:30 23:30 21:30 T.sub.1/ C. 43.6 48.8 46.2 49.4 49.1 44.5 44.7 43.4 42.6 T.sub.2/ C. 30.8 37.1 39.5 37.2 37 35.8 37 35 37.2 T.sub.3/ C. 33.6 37.6 40.9 38.1 37.7 38.8 37.8 37.3 41.9 T.sub.4/ C. 32.5 35.8 39.6 39.2 36.2 39.3 36.7 36.5 41.6 T.sub.5/ C. 42.2 47.9 53.8 30.2 45.5 49.8 35.1 38.2 38.5 T.sub.6/ C. 88.9 81.7 89.5 81.9 86.3 91 89.3 80.9 82.1 T.sub.7/ C. 36.1 39.5 42.5 40.8 40 39.1 38.5 37.4 41 T.sub.8/ C. 115.7 113.9 117.4 114.6 113.2 112 111.5 100.9 101 T.sub.9/ C. 108.1 105.1 103.2 99.4 99.4 101.4 100.1 91.5 94.2 T.sub.10/ C. 116.5 116 115.3 114 113.4 113.4 112.8 103.7 105.6 T.sub.11/ C. 115.9 115 116.5 115.6 112.8 112.6 112.3 101.4 101.9 T.sub.12/ C. 106.5 106 105.7 104.7 104.2 103.6 103.8 92.6 92.4 T.sub.13/ C. 114 114.3 116.3 114.9 114.8 114.4 115.5 109.1 106.1 T.sub.14/ C. 106.9 108.2 107.6 105.5 105.7 106.9 107.1 94.2 91.6 T.sub.15/ C. 105 105 104.9 103.7 103.6 103.1 103.2 92.3 92.2 T.sub.16/ C. 44.5 44.3 36.8 41.2 36.3 36 36.4 38.6 50.1 P.sub.1/kPa 16 17 19 20 17 19 20 20 16.85 P.sub.2/kPa 11 10 12 10 10 11 10 10 10.9 P.sub.3/kPa 1 2 2 0 3 2 10 30 13 P.sub.4/kPa 26 27 3 30 20 27 30 0 0 P.sub.5/kPa 3 2 3 0 3 2 0 40 36.3 F.sub.1(m.sup.3/hr) 105 100 105 105 105 115 105 95 105 F.sub.2(l/min) 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 F.sub.3(m.sup.3/hr) 18 11.1 22.3 24.6 8.7 24.4 18.4 22.3 16 F.sub.4(m.sup.3/hr) 10.2 4 9.5 11.6 4.0 7 10 4.5 8.8 A.sub.1 SO.sub.2(PPm) 1248.4 801 1267.6 963.4 989 675.4 783.8 1053.5 1001.9 NO(PPm) CO.sub.2(V %) 3.48 5.27 3.29 4.86 3.2 4.19 3.34 3.43 4.82 O.sub.2(V %) A.sub.2 SO.sub.2(PPm) 1.1 1 22.9 45.2 3.8 11.4 3.7 7.1 29 NO(PPm) CO.sub.2(V %) 3.66 5.26 3.28 4.94 3.53 4.36 3.44 3.46 5.83 O.sub.2(V %) A.sub.3 SO.sub.2(V %) 55.55 71.8 68.74 64.77 79.74 79.98 NO(V %) CO.sub.2(V %) O.sub.2(V %) A.sub.4 SO.sub.2(g/l) 2.10 1.744 1.47 1.5224 1.467 0.54 1.0242 1.2233 0.91 NO(g/l) A.sub.5 SO.sub.2(g/l) 0.19 0.109 0.08 0.083 0.083 0.06 0.0415 0.1037 0.129 NO(g/l) A.sub.6 SO.sub.2(g/l) 0.0163 0.0014 0.01 0.0108 0.0025 0.001 0.0077 0.0019 0.0016 NO(g/l)
(50) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Operation data for the case where 60% PEG400 (w) + 30% H.sub.2O (w) + 10% monosodium citrate (w) solution worked as desulfurization-denitration solution (May 18 to 21, 2014, two sets per day, 3 sets of data on date 21) Time 3:30 7:30 13:30 23:30 7:30 23:30 7:30 11:30 23:30 T.sub.1/ C. 41.6 44.5 44.7 42.6 41.2 42.4 46.9 39.7 T.sub.2/ C. 37.3 35.2 36.5 39.1 35.9 33.1 39.7 39.7 T.sub.3/ C. 42 38 40.4 43.7 39.2 34.8 41.7 41.9 T.sub.4/ C. 42 38.9 40 42.5 38.4 35.9 40.8 40.9 T.sub.5/ C. 44.3 32.7 40.4 41.5 40.7 32.8 42.9 42.9 T.sub.6/ C. 54.7 50.1 52.5 56.1 56 45 55.3 55 T.sub.7/ C. 42.4 39.8 41.4 45 39.2 38.1 41.7 41.8 T.sub.8/ C. 105.5 108.9 116.1 113.3 112.1 113.3 113.2 110.6 T.sub.9/ C. 92.1 96.1 101.9 101.9 101.6 101.9 99.3 140.4 T.sub.10/ C. 101.5 110.5 113 113.4 113.4 113.6 112.8 111.6 T.sub.11/ C. 105.6 1110 115.6 113.8 112.6 112.6 113.3 111.1 T.sub.12/ C. 92.6 98.7 103.4 102.9 102.7 102.4 102.8 101.5 T.sub.13/ C. 106 110.4 118.3 117.3 111.7 111.7 114.2 110.5 T.sub.14/ C. 91.1 90.7 103.8 105.1 104.9 103.8 103.1 105.3 T.sub.15/ C. 92.6 98.2 103 102.7 102.6 102.2 102.7 101.7 T.sub.16/ C. 35.9 38.7 34.3 34.3 37.7 37.5 36.8 37.9 P.sub.1/kPa 18.95 14.9 17.15 20.4 18.7 16.4 20.4 21.2 P.sub.2/kPa 6.2 7.95 6.65 5.7 5.55 8 3.3 4.45 P.sub.3/kPa 28.45 19.6 2.45 4.15 1.7 7.55 4.95 2.65 P.sub.4/kPa 4.8 2.1 56.25 51.6 24.6 17.55 33.75 20.85 P.sub.5/kPa 31.8 21.1 4.25 4.65 5.55 7.5 5.8 4.4 F.sub.1(m.sup.3/hr) 80 105 105 105 95 95 105 95 80 F.sub.2(l/min) 25 20 25 22 22 20 18 22 22 F.sub.3(m.sup.3/hr) 16.4 17.9 16.8 15 15.8 1.5 14.1 24.2 F.sub.4(m.sup.3/hr) 6.3 6.7 6.7 5.3 4.9 0 5.1 6.9 A.sub.1 SO.sub.2(PPm) 1011 1207.5 1860 910.5 975 888.1 634.4 543 912 NO(PPm) 83 95 351.8 263.5 79.5 29.8 84.3 178 65.9 CO.sub.2(V %) 4.275 2.89 3.67 4.4 3.6 2.35 1.96 3.5 3.36 O.sub.2(V %) 20.3 20.6 20.9 20.6 20.1 20.25 A.sub.2 SO.sub.2(PPm) 5.75 67.25 22.4 4.1 27.5 8.8 14.4 39.8 93.8 NO(PPm) 94 79.1 318 219.5 54.3 11.4 29.3 145.1 27 CO.sub.2(V %) 4.2 2.86 4.14 4.5 3.7 2.57 1.92 3.5 3.77 O.sub.2(V %) 19.9 20.4 20.5 21 20.3 20.31 A.sub.3 SO.sub.2(V %) 88.3 89.6 89.5 90 90 89.6 90 NO(V %) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 CO.sub.2(V %) 5.1 12.6 11.6 5.35 8.2 14.1 10.4 O.sub.2(V %) A.sub.4 SO.sub.2(g/l) 0.49 1.09 1.0626 0.6531 0.49 0.5464 0.4798 0.4265 0.3532 NO(g/l) A.sub.5 SO.sub.2(g/l) 0.11 0.0076 0.015 0.02 0.048 0.0266 0.0267 0.0533 0.0267 NO(g/l) A.sub.6 SO.sub.2(g/l) 0.010 0.006 0.0054 0.0014 0.001 0.0018 0.0017 0.0012 0.0065 NO(g/l)
(51) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Operation data for the case where 30% EG (w) + 30% PEG400 (w) + 30% H.sub.2O (w) + 10% monosodium citrate (w) solution worked as desulfurization-denitration solution (excerpts from May, 23 to 31, 2014) Time 7:30 9:30 9:30 21:30 19:30 9:30 9:30 7:30 7:30 T.sub.1/ C. 40.8 54.7 56.1 54.5 57.9 56.9 57.4 54.8 55.6 T.sub.2/ C. 27 26.3 24.4 23.7 25.2 23.5 23.2 27.3 22.3 T.sub.3/ C. 38.5 39.7 37.6 37.1 38.1 35.1 37.2 37.3 35.1 T.sub.4/ C. 38.3 39.1 37.2 37.1 38.6 36.8 35.2 37.5 35 T.sub.5/ C. 46.2 44.9 37.2 40.7 45 34.5 31.7 39.7 37.6 T.sub.6/ C. 60.8 54.2 46.2 55.2 53 45.1 46.9 37.4 63.7 T.sub.7/ C. 40.8 42.4 38 39.6 39.8 37.7 40.1 38.5 38.3 T.sub.8/ C. 114.7 107.4 112.7 109.8 108 109 114.1 108.1 112.1 T.sub.9/ C. 104.1 104.7 110.7 92.8 107 101.3 102.8 107.7 111.6 T.sub.10/ C. 116.2 112.9 115.8 113 113.5 112.6 115.7 114.0 116.1 T.sub.11/ C. 115.6 108.5 113.2 111.1 105.7 104.8 107.6 103.3 106.7 T.sub.12/ C. 104.1 99 102.3 100.2 102.3 101 103.7 100.1 103 T.sub.13/ C. 110.9 135.4 114.4 110.5 111.3 111.2 116 111.4 112.4 T.sub.14/ C. 104 100.6 105.4 101 101.6 104.7 105.7 103.9 105.1 T.sub.15/ C. 103.7 99.1 100.9 100 98.2 99.8 102.9 100.1 103.1 T.sub.16/ C. 36.7 43.1 39.8 37.3 40.4 38.6 39.5 38.4 37.6 P.sub.1/kPa 13.75 20.2 15.65 16.2 16.85 17.15 16.25 15.9 17.8 P.sub.2/kPa 7.4 4.95 6.85 8.75 8.65 8.8 8.9 6.1 10.2 P.sub.3/kPa 1.1 10.55 4.3 8.9 3.65 9.7 0.5 6.8 0.9 P.sub.4/kPa 23.1 135.15 34.05 22.5 22.95 21.45 46.2 25.8 28.95 P.sub.5/kPa 3.1 14.25 8.1 11.05 5.25 11.5 1.15 9.5 0.35 F.sub.1(m.sup.3/hr) 110 110 115 115 120 120 120 110 114 F.sub.2(l/min) 15 18 18 14 15 15 15 15 15 F.sub.3(m.sup.3/hr) 17.8 23.2 18.5 20.4 19.7 21.3 24.6 25 15.6 F.sub.4(m.sup.3/hr) 5.1 6.4 6.1 5.2 5.9 5.9 5.1 7 4.9 A.sub.1 SO.sub.2(PPm) 1141.5 708 933 528 490.5 690 805.5 646.5 538.5 NO(PPm) 75.8 23.3 33.5 32.8 28 29.8 45 35.8 21.1 CO.sub.2(V %) 4.5 1.8 7.9 4.7 7.3 7.3 5.97 7.8 7.57 O.sub.2(V %) 20.4 18.4 20 18.6 19.9 17.2 18.425 17.8 18.8 A.sub.2 SO.sub.2(PPm) 2.1 6.6 4.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 4.4 48.8 9.5 NO(PPm) 28.9 3.3 8.3 5.3 1.4 10.4 16.9 3.0 12.4 CO.sub.2(V %) 5.1 1.8 6.7 4.8 8.9 8.2 6.7 8.1 9.4 O.sub.2(V %) 20.1 18.5 18.6 18.6 16.4 17.6 18.8 18.1 19 A.sub.3 SO.sub.2(V %) 89.7 83.6 89.3 56.2 43.7 72.4 80.6 64.5 82 NO(V %) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0.06 0.1 0.09 CO.sub.2(V %) 6.7 5.8 10.1 6 O.sub.2(V %) A.sub.4 SO.sub.2(g/l) 0.9611 1.01 1.4776 0.6712 1.2088 1.2217 1.5209 1.1728 0.7552 NO(g/l) A.sub.5 SO.sub.2(g/l) 0.0163 0.1662 0.0358 0.0358 0.044 0.068 0.0383 0.1462 0.1114 NO(g/l) A.sub.6 SO.sub.2(g/l) 0.0009 0.0011 0.0017 0.0016 0.0016 0.0027 0.0010 0.0009 0.0019 NO(g/l)