Power drive unit with power-off dynamic brake
09889990 ยท 2018-02-13
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B60L7/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y02T10/64
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y02T10/72
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
B64D2009/006
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B64D9/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60L7/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60L15/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
An electromechanical actuator power drive unit for dynamic braking is provided, comprising an electric motor with a stator, a rotor that rotates with respect to the stator, and windings fixed to the stator. There is a control unit configured to supply a current to the windings. When the control unit is not supplying current to the windings, an electrical device allows current to flow through a parallel current path to the windings. The new current is generated by the interaction of a roller connected with a gear set to the rotor. The roller, and therefore the rotor, is urged in a rotational direction by the translational velocity of a load in contact with the roller. The new current generated by the rotating rotor flows in the opposite direction as the first current supplied by the power supply unit and creates a dynamic braking torque in the electric motor.
Claims
1. An electromechanical actuator power drive unit for dynamic braking comprising: an electric motor comprising a stator and a rotor that is rotatable with respect to the stator, and windings; a control unit configured to supply a first electric current to the windings; an electrical device in series with the windings; wherein the electrical device allows current to flow through a parallel current path when the control unit is not supplying the first electric current to the windings; at least one roller operably connected with a transmission to the rotor, the at least one roller configured to receive a load, and rotate when the load translates over the at least one roller; wherein the translation of the load urges the rotation of the at least one roller, wherein the electrical device allows current to flow through the parallel current path and when the control unit is not supplying the first electric current to the windings, the rotating rotor generates a second electric current in the windings in the opposite direction as the first electric current; and wherein the second electric current creates a dynamic braking torque in the electric motor.
2. The electromechanical actuator power drive unit in claim 1, wherein the electric motor is a brushless DC motor having an inverter.
3. The electromechanical actuator power drive unit in claim 1, wherein the electric motor is a brushed DC motor.
4. The electromechanical actuator power drive unit in claim 1, wherein the electrical device is a relay having a normally closed contact, wherein the control unit is configured to supply current to open the contact when the control unit is energized.
5. The electromechanical actuator power drive unit in claim 1, wherein the electrical device is an electronic device configured to close the separate circuit with the windings when the control unit is not energized.
6. The electromechanical actuator power drive unit in claim 1, wherein the electrical device is a depletion mode FET (field effect transistor), wherein the control unit is electrically connected to a gate of the FET.
7. The electromechanical actuator power drive unit in claim 1, wherein the electrical device is a solid state relay configured to close the separate circuit with the windings when the control unit is not energized.
8. The electromechanical actuator power drive unit in claim 1, further comprising one or more resistors in series with the windings and the electrical device, the one or more resistors having a resistance value.
9. The electromechanical actuator power drive unit in claim 8, wherein the one or more resistors each have a variable resistance value.
10. The electromechanical actuator power drive unit in claim 1, wherein the control unit is connected to an external electric power supply.
11. The electromechanical actuator power drive unit in claim 1, wherein the dynamic braking torque is proportional to the rotor velocity and the resistance value.
12. A method for performing a dynamic braking function, the method comprising: providing a first electric current to an electric motor, the electric motor comprising a stator and a rotor that is rotatable with respect to the stator and windings; wherein at least one roller is operably connected to the rotor and is configured to receive a load; allowing current to flow through a parallel current path when the first electric current is not being provided to the electric motor; allowing the load to rotate the at least one roller when the load translates over the at least one roller; creating a rotor velocity with the rotating roller; generating a second electric current in the windings and the electric device in the opposite direction as the first electric current when the first electric current is not being provided to the electric motor; and creating a dynamic braking torque in the electric motor with the second electric current.
13. The method for performing a dynamic braking function in claim 12, wherein the electric motor is a brushless DC motor having an inverter.
14. The method for performing a dynamic braking function in claim 12, wherein the electric motor is a brushed DC motor.
15. The method for performing a dynamic braking function in claim 12, wherein the electrical device is a relay having a normally closed contact.
16. The method for performing a dynamic braking function in claim 12, wherein the electrical device is an electronic device configured to close the separate circuit with the windings when the electrical power supply is not supplying power.
17. The method for performing a dynamic braking function in claim 12, further comprising one or more resistors in series with the windings and the electrical device, the one or more resistors having a resistance value.
18. The method for performing a dynamic braking function in claim 17, wherein the one or more resistors each have a variable resistance value.
19. The method for performing a dynamic braking function claim 12, wherein the control unit is connected to an external electric power supply.
20. The method for performing a dynamic braking function in claim 12, wherein the dynamic braking torque is proportional to the rotor velocity and the resistance value.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(7) Aircraft cargo loading systems are designed to assist with loading large containers or loads into aircraft. The containers or loads rest on rollers that are normally powered by an electric power drive unit, which often includes a brushless DC motor, but can otherwise include different types of prime movers. The velocity of the rollers carrying the containers (i.e., the load) is controlled by the motor speed of the power drive unit. If there is an electrical power loss to the power drive unit, there is nothing to prevent the containers or load from freely moving on the rollers at any speed. Some conventional aircraft cargo loading systems do not include any systems or structure to provide braking or resistance force to prevent or slow movement upon the power drive unit during power loss.
(8) Other aircraft cargo loading systems may include a backup system to supply a braking force in the event of power loss to the power drive unit. Some backup braking systems for aircraft cargo loading systems use a backup generator or other power source to provide a braking force when the power drive unit experiences a power loss. These backup systems typically use mechanical braking rollers, which have a constant torque. One disadvantage to having a constant braking torque applied to the rollers is that the containers or load cannot be moved with manual, human power. Therefore, during power loss to the power drive unit, loading and unloading operations must cease. The constant braking torque opposes the work done by the power drive unit, which may reduce the performance of the powered system.
(9) One embodiment of a typical PDU 200 for use with aircraft cargo loading systems is depicted in
(10) Turning now to
(11) As illustrated, the control unit 110 may include transistors 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, and 116 (shown schematically in
(12) In one embodiment of the disclosure, when the control unit 110 supplies power and turns on transistors 114 and 113, current will flow into stator winding 121 and out of stator winding 123, while stator winding 122 is idle, as shown in
(13) The rotor 140 shown in
(14)
(15) When the control unit 110 is not supplying power to the motor 120, the control unit 110 is also not supplying power to the relay 132 to hold the relay 132 in the opened position. Therefore, when the control unit 110 is not supplying power to the motor 120, the relay 132 closes automatically creating a closed dynamic brake relay circuit 130 between the stator windings 121 and 123 and the resistor 131, as illustrated in
(16) Instead, when the control unit 110 is not supplying power to the motor 120, the velocity of the load 150 may urge the rotation of the rollers 160, as the load translates over the rollers 160 due to frictional forces therebetween, causing the rollers 160 to rotate without input from the rotor 140. The rotating rollers 160 may instead cause the rotor 140 to rotate. The rotating rotor 140 creates a voltage in the stator windings 121 and 123 that creates a parallel current flow through the dynamic brake relay circuit 130 in the opposite direction to the current flowing through the stator windings 121-123 when the control unit 110 was supplying power to the system. This is illustrated in
(17) The lower the velocity of the load 150, the lower the rotational velocity of the rollers 160, due to the frictional forces between the surface of the load 150 and the rollers 160. The lower the rotational velocity of the rollers 160, the lower the rotational velocity of the rotor 140. The lower the rotational velocity of the rotor 140, the lower the current generated in the stator windings 121 and 123 based upon the relative rotation of the rotor 140 with respect to the stator 124, and the weaker the magnetic field formed in the stator windings 121 and 123. When a weaker magnetic field is formed in the stator windings 121 and 123, there will be less of an opposing force provided to the permanent magnets 141 fixed to the rotor 140. Therefore, the lower the velocity of the load 150, the lower the dynamic braking torque applied to resist the translational velocity of the load 150. Frictional force may also contribute to reducing the translational velocity of the load 150 due to resistance of rotation of the rotor 140. The dynamic braking torque may be proportional to the velocity of the rotor 140 and the resistance value of the resistor 131.
(18) Conversely, the greater the velocity of the load 150, the higher the rotational velocity of the rollers 160, due to the frictional forces between the surface of the load 150 and the rollers 160. The higher the rotational velocity of the rollers 160, the higher the rotational velocity of the rotor 140. The higher the rotational velocity of the rotor 140, the higher the current generated in the stator windings 121 and 123 based upon the relative rotation of the rotor 140 with respect to the stator 124, and the stronger the magnetic field formed in the stator windings 121 and 123. When a stronger magnetic field is formed in the stator windings 121 and 123, there will be a greater opposing force provided to the permanent magnets 141 fixed to the rotor 140. Therefore, the higher the velocity of the load 150, the higher the dynamic braking torque applied to resist the translational velocity of the load 150 due to the resistance of rotation of the rotor 140. Human input may also be a force that causes the load 150 translate faster.
(19) The resistance value of the resistor 131 will also affect the retarding force of the system. A resistor 131 with a lower resistance value will allow more current to flow through the dynamic brake relay circuit 130. Allowing more current to flow through the dynamic brake relay circuit 130 will create a stronger magnetic field in the stator windings 121 and 123. The stronger the magnetic field in the stator windings 121 and 123, the larger the retarding or dynamic braking force will be. In other words, there will be a stronger force opposing the permanent magnets 141 in the rotor 140.
(20) Conversely, a resistor 131 with a higher resistance value will allow less current to flow through the dynamic brake relay circuit 130. Allowing less current to flow through the dynamic brake relay circuit 130 will create a weaker magnetic field in the windings 121 and 123. The weaker the magnetic field in the stator windings 121 and 123, the less retarding or dynamic braking force there will be. In other words, there will be a weaker force opposing the permanent magnets 141 in the rotor 140. This will allow the load 150 to move more freely because the dynamic braking on the rotor 140 will be less.
(21) In one exemplary embodiment, the resistor 131 may be 220 ohms/50 watts. In other embodiments, the resistor 131 may have a different resistance value, or within a range of resistance values. One of ordinary skill in the art with a thorough review of this specification will be able to choose the proper resistance value of the resistor 131, which may be a function of the specifications of the specific motor used.
(22) While the preferred embodiments of the disclosure have been described, it should be understood that the disclosure is not so limited and modifications may be made without departing from the invention. The scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims, and all devices that come within the meaning of the claims, either literally or by equivalence, are intended to be embraced therein.