Porous adsorbent for trapping radioactive iodine gas and method of manufacturing the same

Abstract

Provided are an adsorbent for trapping a radioactive iodine gas generated in a process of oxidizing a nuclear fuel at a high temperature after use and a method of preparing the same, and more particularly, a radioactive iodine gas adsorbent which is formed of bismuth as a main component, thereby exhibiting an excellent radioactive iodine gas trapping capability and an excellent thermal stability after trapping, and a method of preparing the same. An adsorbent for trapping a radioactive iodine gas prepared by a method of preparing an adsorbent for trapping a radioactive iodine gas according to the present disclosure may effectively trap a radioactive iodine off-gas generated in a nuclear fuel pre-treated oxidizing process after use. Particularly, the adsorbent may trap iodine in a larger amount, which is twice or more, than a silver-containing zeolite widely used to trap a radioactive iodine gas, and the trapped iodine forms a stable compound, which is more advantageous for long-term storage. In addition, since an iodine gas is trapped using inexpensive bismuth, instead of expensive silver, in consideration of trapping a large amount of a radioactive iodine gas, the adsorbent has very excellent economic feasibility.

Claims

1. A method of manufacturing a radioactive iodine gas adsorbent, comprising the following steps of: (a) preparing a mixed solution by mixing a solution including 10 to 20 wt % of bismuth nitrate and a solution including 10 to 20 wt % of polyvinylalcohol; (b) preparing a mixture by drying the mixed solution to remove moisture; (c) preparing an oxide by heat-treating the mixture in an air atmosphere to remove the polyvinylalcohol; and (d) reducing the oxide to an elemental bismuth state by heat-treating the oxide in a hydrogen-containing atmosphere.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein, in the step (a), the solution including 10 to 20 wt % of bismuth nitrate includes 10 to 50 ml of nitric acid per 100 ml of distilled water.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the drying in the step (b) is performed at 40 to 70 C. for 1 to 4 days.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the heat-treating in step (c) is performed in an air atmosphere at 400 to 500 C. for 2 to 3 hours.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the reduction in the step (d) is performed in a 4% hydrogen-containing atmosphere at 300 to 350 C. for 6 to 12 hours.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The above and other objects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the adhered drawings, in which:

(2) FIG. 1 is an image of a porous adsorbent for trapping a radioactive iodine gas prepared by a method of manufacturing an adsorbent according to the present disclosure: (a) an adsorbent thermally treated in an atmospheric ambience at 450 C. and (b) an adsorbent thermally treated in a 4% hydrogen ambience at 310 C.;

(3) FIG. 2 shows X-ray diffraction analysis results for a radioactive iodine gas adsorbent prepared by a method of preparing an adsorbent according to the present disclosure: (a) an adsorbent thermally treated in an atmospheric ambience at 450 C. and (b) an adsorbent thermally treated in a 4% hydrogen ambience at 310 C.;

(4) FIG. 3 shows results obtained by observing a radioactive iodine gas adsorbent manufactured by a method of manufacturing an adsorbent according to the present disclosure, using a scanning electron microscope: (a) a bismuth powder sample, (b) a porous adsorbent manufactured by adding 50 g of polyvinylalcohol, (c) a porous adsorbent manufactured by adding 75 g of polyvinylalcohol, and (d) a porous adsorbent manufactured by adding 100 g of polyvinylalcohol;

(5) FIG. 4 shows results obtained by observing a microstructure and an X-ray element spectrum using a scanning electron microscope after a radioactive iodine gas adsorbent manufactured by a method of manufacturing an adsorbent according to the present disclosure reacts with iodine at 200 C. for 24 hours: (a) a bismuth powder sample, (b) a porous adsorbent manufactured by adding 50 g of polyvinylalcohol, (c) a porous adsorbent manufactured by adding 75 g of polyvinylalcohol, (d) a porous adsorbent manufactured by adding 100 g of polyvinylalcohol, and (e) and (f) X-ray element spectrums characteristically shown from four samples;

(6) FIG. 5 shows X-ray diffraction analysis results after a radioactive iodine gas adsorbent manufactured by a method of manufacturing an adsorbent according to the present disclosure reacts with iodine at 200 C. for 24 hours;

(7) FIG. 6 shows results obtained from weight loss and heat flow curves using thermogravimetric analysis after a radioactive iodine gas adsorbent manufactured by a method of manufacturing an adsorbent according to the present disclosure reacts with iodine at 200 C. for 24 hours: (a) a bismuth powder sample, (b) a porous adsorbent manufactured by adding 50 g of polyvinylalcohol, (c) a porous adsorbent manufactured by adding 75 g of polyvinylalcohol, and (d) a porous adsorbent manufactured by adding 100 g of polyvinylalcohol; and

(8) FIGS. 7 and 8 show results for comparing iodine trapping capabilities after a porous adsorbent for trapping a radioactive iodine gas, a bismuth powder sample, and an AgX sample react with iodine at 200 C. for 24 hours.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

(9) Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be described in detail.

(10) The present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing a radioactive iodine gas adsorbent, which includes the following steps:

(11) (a) preparing a mixed solution by mixing a solution including bismuth nitrate at 10 to 20 wt % and a solution including polyvinylalcohol at 10 to 20 wt %;

(12) (b) preparing a mixture by drying the mixed solution to remove moisture;

(13) (c) preparing an oxide by thermally treating the mixture in an atmospheric ambience to remove polyvinylalcohol; and

(14) (d) reducing the oxide to a bismuth element state by heat-treating the oxide in a hydrogen ambience.

(15) In the step (a), the mixed solution is prepared by mixing a solution including bismuth nitrate and a solution including polyvinylalcohol. The bismuth nitrate and the polyvinylalcohol should be contained within a suitable range to ultimately achieve processability of a porous adsorbent which will be prepared, and the mixed solution may be prepared by mixing a solution including 10 to 20 wt % of bismuth nitrate and a solution including 10 to 20 wt % of polyvinylalcohol, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto. In addition, the solution including 10 to 20 wt % of bismuth nitrate may include 10 to 50 ml of nitric acid per 100 ml of distilled water, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.

(16) In the step (b), the mixed solution prepared in the step (a) may be dried to remove moisture, thereby preparing a mixture, specifically, at 40 to 70 C. for 1 to 4 days, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.

(17) In the step (c), the mixture prepared in the step (b) may be heat-treated in an atmospheric ambience to remove polyvinylalcohol, thereby preparing an oxide, specifically, in an atmospheric ambience at 400 to 500 C. for 2 to 3 hours, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.

(18) In the step (d), the oxide prepared in the step (c) may be heat-treated in a hydrogen ambience to be reduced to a bismuth element state, specifically, in a 4% hydrogen ambience at 300 to 350 C. for 6 to 12 hours, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.

(19) In one exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, an adsorbent reduced to a bismuth element state is manufactured by preparing solutions including bismuth nitrate and polyvinylalcohol, respectively, mixing the two solutions, drying the solutions in an oven for several days to remove moisture, heating the dehydrated mixture in an atmospheric ambience for several hours to remove polyvinylalcohol, and heat-treating a part of the sample again in a hydrogen ambience (refer to Example 1), and a structure of the adsorbent is analyzed to confirm to be porous form(refer to Example 2).

(20) In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, as a result of analyzing iodine gas trapping performance of an adsorbent of the present disclosure, it is confirmed that the adsorbent of the present disclosure has high trapping performance twice or more than a commercialized adsorbent (silver-containing zeolite) (refer to Example 3).

(21) In addition, in another aspect of the present disclosure, the present disclosure provides a radioactive iodine gas adsorbent manufactured by the above method. The radioactive iodine gas adsorbent prepared by the manufacturing method of the present disclosure may be porous, and may be manufactured in an amorphous bead having a size within 1 cm. In addition, to enhance a mechanical strength of the manufacture adsorbent, a support material such as silica or alumina may be mixed. Since the porous adsorbent according to the present disclosure which is manufactured using bismuth and polyvinylalcohol may dramatically enhance trapping performance of an iodine gas and increase thermal stability of the trapped iodine over 100 C., compared to conventional silver-containing zeolite, the adsorbent is advantageous for long-term disposal.

(22) In still another aspect of the present disclosure, the present disclosure provides a method of trapping a radioactive iodine gas, which includes trapping a gas containing a radioactive iodine gas by passing through the adsorbent. Here, the reaction between the radioactive iodine gas and the adsorbent may be performed at 200 to 250 C. for 24 hours.

(23) Hereinafter, exemplary examples will be provided to help in understanding the present disclosure. However, the following examples are merely provided to facilitate the understanding of the present disclosure, and the scope of the present disclosure is not limited to the following examples.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Manufacture of Radioactive Iodine Gas Adsorbent

(24) To manufacture a porous adsorbent consisted of bismuth, a solution was prepared by adding 100 g of bismuth nitrate to 100 ml of distilled water, and adding 50 ml of nitric acid as a catalyst to completely dissolve the mixture. Mixed solutions were prepared by preparing three types of solutions prepared by dissolving 50, 75, and 100 g of polyvinylalcohol in 500 ml of distilled water, respectively, and mixing each solution with the previously prepared bismuth nitrate solution. To evaporate the distilled water included in the prepared mixed solution, the solution was sufficiently dried in a drier at 70 C. for 3 to 4 days, thereby obtaining a gel-type material. Here, when a drying time is excessively long, the gel shape may be deformed. The dried material was put into a heat treatment furnace and thermally treated at 400 C. for 3 hours to increase a temperature in an atmospheric ambience by 1 C. per minute in order to remove polyvinylalcohol, and then an image of the prepared material (oxide) is shown in FIG. 1(a).

(25) As shown in FIG. 1(a), it can be confirmed that the adsorbent was yellow, and had a porous type having many pores on its surface after polyvinylalcohol was removed.

(26) Afterward, some of the samples was taken after thermal treatment, and reduced in a 4% hydrogen ambience at 310 C. for 12 hours, thereby manufacturing a radioactive iodine gas adsorbent, and an image of the radioactive iodine gas adsorbent is shown in FIG. 1(b).

Example 2

Analysis of Structure of Radioactive Iodine as Adsorbent

(27) 2-1. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

(28) X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD, Bruker) was performed to each radioactive iodine gas adsorbent manufactured by Example 1, and analysis results are shown in FIG. 2.

(29) As shown in FIG. 2, it was confirmed that a sample manufactured through thermal treatment at 400 C. showed a main crystal peak for Bi.sub.2O.sub.3 (refer to FIG. 2(a)), and a sample produced through reduction in a hydrogen ambience showed a very weak intensity of a Bi.sub.2O.sub.3 crystal peak, and a relatively strong intensity of a Bi crystal peak (refer to FIG. 2(b)). It was seen from the results that most parts of the bismuth oxide present in the sample were reduced into Bi due to hydrogen reduction.

(30) 2-2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

(31) Each adsorbent manufactured by adding 50, 75, and 100 g of polyvinylalcohol according to Example 1 were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi), and results are shown in FIG. 3.

(32) As shown in FIG. 3, a bismuth powder sample did not have pores, except small pores present on a boundary surface of powder particles (refer to FIG. 3(a)), and it can be confirmed that the sample manufactured by adding each of 50, 75, and 100 g of polyvinylalcohol had many pores (refer to FIGS. 3(b) to 3(d)). It can be seen from the results that the part of the sample from which the polyvinylalcohol was removed had pores.

Example 3

Examination of Trapping Performance and Thermal Stability of Radioactive Iodine as Adsorbent

(33) A trapping reaction with iodine was performed to each of three types of samples manufactured by adding 50, 75, and 100 g of polyvinylalcohol in Example 1 and performing thermal treatment at 400 C., three types of samples prepared through reduction at 310 C., bismuth powder, and an AgX sample. To this end, approximately 0.3 g each of the samples and the iodine crystal powder was taken, and put into an alumina furnace, closed with a lid, and subjected to a trapping reaction at 200 C. for 24 hours.

(34) 3-1. Analysis Using SEM-EDS

(35) A bismuth powder sample, and samples manufactured by adding 50, 75, and 100 g of polyvinylalcohol and being reduced at 310 C., respectively, were reacted with iodine at 200 C. for 24 hours, and microstructures thereof were observed using SEM-EDS, and therefore results are shown in FIG. 4.

(36) As shown in FIG. 4, it can be confirmed that, compared to before reacting with iodine, structures having various shapes such as a rock, a plate, a rod, and a rose were produced (refer to FIGS. 4(a) to 4(d)).

(37) In addition, representative atomic analysis for each sample was performed through an atomic analysis spectrum, and therefore analysis results are shown in FIG. 4.

(38) As shown in FIG. 4, it can be confirmed that each structure was Bi, I, or a material consisted of Bi, O, or I (refer to FIGS. 4(e) and 4(f)).

(39) 3-2. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

(40) A bismuth powder sample and samples manufactured by adding 50, 75, and 100 g of polyvinylalcohol and being reduced at 310 C., respectively, were reacted with iodine at 200 C. for 24 hours, and crystal structures thereof were observed by X-ray diffraction analysis, and therefore results are shown in FIG. 5.

(41) As shown in FIG. 5, it can be confirmed that most of crystal peaks shown from each sample after the iodine reaction corresponded to BiOI and BiI.sub.3 crystals, and in the uppermost graph in FIG. 5, the more stronger BiOI crystal peak was shown. Here, Bi, BP1, BP2, and BP3 mean bismuth powder and samples manufactured by adding 50, 75, and 100 g of polyvinylalcohol, respectively.

(42) 3-3. Thermogravimetric Analysis

(43) A bismuth powder sample, and samples prepared by adding 50, 75, and 100 g of polyvinylalcohol and being reduced at 310 C., respectively, were reacted with iodine at 200 C. for 24 hours, and thermal stability of each sample was analyzed by thermogravimetric analysis (TG-DSC, Setaram), and therefore results are shown in FIG. 6.

(44) As shown in FIG. 6, it was confirmed that a weight loss was shown from all of four samples at 300 C. or more, and then a weight loss was shown again at 500 C. or more. Meanwhile, compared to FIG. 5, it can be confirmed that the first weight loss was exhibited from volatilization of BiI.sub.3, and the second weight loss was exhibited from volatilization of BiOI.

(45) 3-4. Comparison of Trapping Performance with Silver-containing Zeolite

(46) A bismuth powder sample, samples manufactured by adding each of 50, 75, and 100 g of polyvinylalcohol and performing reduction at 310 C., and an AgX sample were reacted with iodine at 200 C. for 24 hours, and trapping performance of the iodine was measured and compared, and therefore the comparison results are shown in FIGS. 7 and 8.

(47) As shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, it can be confirmed that AgX was capable of trapping approximately 0.25 g of iodine per a sample unit weight, while the bismuth powder sample and the sample manufactured by adding polyvinylalcohol and performing reduction exhibited higher trapping performances than the iodine trapping performance of the AgX. As a result of tests repeated five times, it can be confirmed that the maximum iodine trapping performance was approximately 0.72 g per sample unit weight, and the maximum average trapping performance was approximately 0.55 g (refer to FIG. 8).

(48) Meanwhile, the iodine trapping performances exhibited in the tests performed five times have some differences as shown in the graph, and thus it is considered to be caused by non-uniformity generated in the process of manufacturing a sample. That is, it was considered that since each part of the sample finally prepared had a difference in pore characteristic due to non-uniform distribution of the polyvinylalcohol, even with the same adsorbent, there was a difference in iodine trapping performance in each test.

(49) From the result, it was confirmed that the porous adsorbent manufactured in the present disclosure to have trapping performance twice or more than that of AgX could more effectively trap an iodine gas than commercialized AgX. Moreover, it was confirmed by the test that an unreduced sample could not trap the iodine at all, and it was seen that, to actively trap an iodine, bismuth present in a sample should be in an element state, not an oxide state.

(50) An adsorbent for trapping a radioactive iodine gas manufactured by a method of manufactureing an adsorbent for trapping a radioactive iodine gas according to the present disclosure can effectively trap a radioactive iodine off-gas generated in a nuclear fuel pre-treated oxidizing process after use.

(51) Particularly, the adsorbent can trap iodine in a larger amount, which is twice or more, than a silver-containing zeolite widely used to trap a radioactive iodine gas, and the trapped iodine forms a stable compound, which is more advantageous for long-term storage.

(52) In addition, since an iodine gas is trapped using inexpensive bismuth, instead of expensive silver, in consideration of trapping a large amount of a radioactive iodine gas, the adsorbent has very excellent economic feasibility.

(53) While the present disclosure has been shown and described with reference to certain exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the present disclosure as defined by the appended claims.