Ferrous phosphate powders, lithium iron phosphate powders for li-ion battery, and methods for manufacturing the same

Abstract

Ferrous (II) phosphate (Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2) powders, lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO.sub.4) powders for a Li-ion battery and methods for manufacturing the same are provided. The lithium iron phosphate powders are represented by the following formula (II):
LiFe.sub.(1-a)M.sub.aPO.sub.4(II)
wherein, M, and a are defined in the specification, the lithium iron phosphate powders are composed of plural flake powders, the length of each of the flake powders is 0.1-10 m, and a ratio of the length and the thickness of each of the flake powder is in a range from 11 to 400.

Claims

1. A method for manufacturing ferrous phosphate (II) powders, sequentially comprising the following steps: (A) providing a P-containing precursor solution, wherein the P-containing precursor solution comprises: a P-containing precursor; (B) adding a weakly alkaline compound into the P-containing precursor solution to obtain a mixture; and (C) adding a ferrous (II) compound into the mixture to obtain ferrous (II) phosphate powders; wherein the ferrous (II) phosphate powders are represented by the following formula (I):
Fe.sub.(3-x)M.sub.x(PO.sub.4).sub.2.yH.sub.2O(I) wherein M comprises at least one metal selected from the group consisting of Mn, Cr, Co, Cu, Ni, V, Mo, Ti, Zn, Zr, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Cd, Pt, Au, Al, Ga, In, Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, B, and Nm, 0x<1.5, y is an integral of 0 to 8, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders are composed of plural flake powders, the length of each of the flake powder is 0.2-10 m, the ratio of the length and thickness of each of the flake powder is in a range of 14 to 500.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least one metal-containing compound is further added into the mixture to obtain a doped ferrous (II) phosphate powders in step (C).

3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the molar ratio of the metal-containing compound to the ferrous compound is 1:1 to 1:99999.

4. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the molar ratio of the metal-containing compound to the ferrous compound is 1:2 to 1:9999.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the P-containing precursor is at least one selected from the group consisting of H.sub.3PO.sub.4, NaH.sub.2PO.sub.4, Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4, Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2, and NH.sub.4H.sub.2PO.sub.4.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the weakly alkaline compound is at least one selected from the group consisting of Na.sub.2CO.sub.3, and NaHCO.sub.3.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ferrous compound is at least one selected from the group consisting of FeCl.sub.2, FeBr.sub.2, FeI.sub.2, FeSO.sub.4, (NH.sub.4).sub.2Fe(SO.sub.4).sub.2, Fe(NO.sub.3).sub.2, O.sub.3).sub.2, FeC.sub.2O.sub.4, (CH.sub.3COO).sub.2Fe, and FeCO.sub.3.

8. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the metal-containing compound is sulfates, carbonates, nitrates, oxalates, acetates, chlorites, bromides, or iodides of Mn, Cr, Co, Cu, Ni, V, Mo, Ti, Zn, Zr, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Cd, Pt, Au, Al, Ga, In, Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, B, or Nb.

9. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the metal-containing compound is sulfates of Mn, Cr, Co, Cu, Ni, Zn, Al, or Mg.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a step (C1) after the step (C): washing the ferrous (II) phosphate powders.

11. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the ferrous (II) phosphate powders is washed with ethanol, water, or a combination thereof.

12. The method as claimed in claim 10, further comprising a step (C2) after the step (C1): drying the obtained ferrous (II) phosphate powders.

13. The method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the ferrous (II) phosphate powders are dried at 40-120 C. for 5-100 hours.

14. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the thickness of each of the flake powder is 1-50 nm.

15. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the flake powders are powders composed of independent flakes, flake powders that one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other, flake powders connecting to each other at the center of the flakes, or flake powders that one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other to form a connecting center.

16. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ferrous (II) phosphate powders are crystallized ferrous (II) phosphate powders.

17. The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the ferrous (II) phosphate powders show an X-ray diffraction pattern 2 angles () having characteristic peaks at about 18.32, 19.84, 23.24, 28.24, 30.32, 33.34, 35.88, 37.20, 39.36, 40.94, and 41.82.

18. The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein the ferrous (II) phosphate powders show an X-ray diffraction pattern 2 angles () having further characteristic peaks at about 20.72, 22.12, 24.86, 27.08, 34.3, and 44.14.

19. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ferrous (II) phosphate powders have a crystallization degree of more than 10%.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIGS. 1A-1F are SEM photos of ferrous (II) phosphate powders according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention;

(2) FIGS. 2A-2B are XRD diffraction patterns of ferrous (II) phosphate powders according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention;

(3) FIGS. 3A-3B are SEM photos of lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention;

(4) FIG. 4 is an XRD diffraction pattern of lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention;

(5) FIGS. 5A-5B are SEM photos of ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Mn according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention;

(6) FIGS. 6A-6B are SEM photos of lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mn according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention;

(7) FIGS. 7A-7B are SEM photos of ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Mg according to Embodiment 3 of the present invention;

(8) FIGS. 8A-8B are SEM photos of lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mg according to Embodiment 3 of the present invention;

(9) FIG. 9 is an XRD diffraction pattern of lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mg according to Embodiment 3 of the present invention;

(10) FIG. 10 is an XRD diffraction pattern of ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Ni and Mg according to Embodiment 4 of the present invention;

(11) FIG. 11 are XRD diffraction patterns of ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped without or with Ni and Mg according to Embodiments 1 and 4 of the present invention;

(12) FIGS. 12A-12C are SEM photos of ferrous (II) phosphate powders according to Comparative Embodiment of the present invention;

(13) FIG. 13 are XRD diffraction patterns of ferrous (II) phosphate powders according to Embodiments 1 and 5, and Comparative Embodiment of the present invention;

(14) FIG. 14 is a SEM photo of lithium iron phosphate powders according to Comparative Embodiment of the present invention;

(15) FIGS. 15A-15B are SEM photos of ferrous (II) phosphate powders according to Embodiment 5 of the present invention;

(16) FIG. 16 are XRD diffraction patterns of ferrous (II) phosphate powders according to Embodiments 4 and 5 of the present invention;

(17) FIGS. 17A-17D are SEM photos of lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiment 5 of the present invention;

(18) FIG. 18 is a SEM photo of lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiment 6 of the present invention;

(19) FIG. 19 are XRD diffraction patterns of lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiments 1, 5 and 6, and Comparative Embodiment of the present invention;

(20) FIG. 20 is a perspective view showing a Li-ion battery according to the present invention;

(21) FIG. 21 shows the discharge capacities of Li-ion batteries prepared with lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiments 1, 5 and 6, and Comparative Embodiment of the present invention;

(22) FIG. 22 shows the discharge capacities of a Li-ion battery prepared with lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiment 5 of the present invention; and

(23) FIG. 23 shows the relation between the voltage and the specific capacities of a Li-ion battery prepared with lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiment 5 of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

(24) The present invention has been described in an illustrative manner, and it is to be understood that the terminology used is intended to be in the nature of description rather than of limitation. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Therefore, it is to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.

Embodiment 1

(25) Preparation of Ferrous (II) Phosphate Powders

(26) H.sub.3PO.sub.4 was added in de-ionized water (500 ml) to obtain a P-containing precursor solution. Next, NaHCO.sub.3 was added into the P-containing precursor solution to obtain a mixture, in which the molar ratio of H.sub.3PO.sub.4 to NaHCO.sub.3 was 1:3. After the mixture was stirred for 30 min, ferrous sulfate hydrate (FeSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O) was added into the mixture, wherein the molar ratio of FeSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O to H.sub.3PO.sub.4 was 3:2. After the reaction was completed, the product was washed with deionized water, and then collected with centrifugation for twice. After the collected product was dried at 55 C. for 45 hours, ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders (Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2.8H.sub.2O) were obtained.

(27) The shapes of the ferrous phosphate (II) powders of the present embodiment were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4000), and the results are shown in FIGS. 1A-1F, which are SEM photos of ferrous (II) phosphate powders observed at the magnification of 1,000, 5,000, 10,000, 10,000, 20,000 and 50,000, respectively. As shown in FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders have flat shapes in macro view. As shown in FIG. 1C, parts of the ferrous (II) phosphate powders are formed in independent flakes. As shown in FIG. 1D, flake powders in which one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other to form a connecting center are also observed. Among the observed powders shown in FIG. 1C and FIG. 1D, most of the powders are powders formed in independent flakes; and flake powders that one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other to form a connecting center are secondly observed. In addition, as shown in FIG. 1C and FIG. 1D, it can be found that partial flake powders are transparent or semi-transparent. Furthermore, as shown in FIG. 1E and FIG. 1F, not only transparent or semi-transparent flake powders can be observed, but also flake powders with partially cured peripheries can also be found. Furthermore, among the observed ferrous (II) phosphate powders, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 1-4 m, and most of them is about 1.5-4 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 10-30 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range from 50 to 400.

(28) In addition, the obtained ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment were also examined with an X-ray diffraction microscope (Shimadzu 6000) to understand the crystal structure thereof. The X-ray diffraction pattern was collected by Cu K radiation, the 2-scanning angle is 15-45, and the scanning rate is 1/min. The obtained XRD diffraction pattern is shown in FIGS. 2A-2B, wherein the upper figures in each figure are the XRD diffraction patterns of ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment, the lower figures in each figure respectively are the XRD diffraction patterns of ferrous (II) phosphate powders (Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2. 8H.sub.2O) JCPDS Nos. 079-1928 and 083-2453, and lines in the upper figures are used to indicate the position of the peaks. As shown in FIG. 2A, only one characteristic peak is indicated by symbol *, which indicates that this peak of the ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment corresponds to the peak of ferrous (II) phosphate powders (Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2.8H.sub.2O) (JCPDS No. 079-1928). Other characteristic peaks are indicated by symbols #, which indicate that these peaks do not correspond to the peaks of JCPDS No. 079-1928; and there are right shifts of about 0.1-0.4 between the characteristic peaks indicated by symbols # and the corresponding peaks of JCPDS No. 079-1928. Except for the aforementioned characteristic peaks, no other peaks are observed in ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment. This result indicates that all the ferrous (II) phosphate powders prepared according to the present embodiment are indeed ferrous (II) phosphate powders.

(29) In addition, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment were observed with a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL 2010), and the results (data not shown) show that about 10% of the powders are crystallized ferrous (II) phosphate powders and about 90% thereof are amorphous powders. From the results of SEM and TEM, it can be inferred that the low signal to noise ratio is caused by the low crystallization degree and thin thickness.

(30) Furthermore, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment were analyzed with Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The results show that the atomic ratio of P to Fe (P/Fe) of the ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment is 0.4/0.62=0.645, and that of standard Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2 powders is 2/3=0.667. This result indicates that the synthesized powders of the present embodiment has similar atomic ratio P/Fe to that of standard Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2 powders, and the deviation thereof is within the experimental range.

(31) Preparation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Powders

(32) Next, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment was used as a precursor, and mixed with Li.sub.3PO.sub.4 in a molar ratio of 1:1. In addition, 15 wt % of sugar was also added in the mixture. The mixture was mixed with a 3D shaker containing 2 mm zirconia balls for 2 hr to obtain mixed powders. Then, the mixed powders were sintered at 750 C., under an atmosphere of N.sub.2 gas for 3 hrs. Finally, LiFePO.sub.4 powders coated with carbon and formed in flake shapes were obtained.

(33) The shapes of the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of the present embodiment were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4000), and the results are shown in FIGS. 3A-3B, which respectively are SEM photos of LiFePO.sub.4 powders observed at the magnification of 20,000 and 50,000. As shown in FIGS. 3A-3B, the sintered LiFePO.sub.4 powders still have similar shape after the heat-treating process to that of the original ferrous (II) phosphate powders, and most of the powders are powders formed in independent flakes. In addition, even though the time for performing the sintering process is short, all the ferrous (II) phosphate powders can be transformed into LiFePO.sub.4, due to the uniform and small size of the ferrous (II) phosphate powders. Furthermore, among the observed LiFePO.sub.4 powders, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 0.6-3 m, and most of them is about 1-3 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 8-20 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range from 30 to 400. It should be noted that the thickness and the length of the LiFePO.sub.4 powders are smaller than those of LiFePO.sub.4 powders due to the ball milling and sintering process.

(34) Furthermore, the obtained LiFePO.sub.4 powders of the present embodiment were also examined with an X-ray diffraction microscope (Shimadzu 6000) to understand the crystal structure thereof. The X-ray diffraction pattern was collected by Cu K radiation, the 2-scanning angle is 15-45, and the scanning rate is 1/min. The obtained XRD diffraction pattern is shown in FIG. 4, wherein the upper figure is the XRD diffraction pattern of LiFePO.sub.4 powders of the present embodiment, the lower figure is the XRD diffraction pattern of LiFePO.sub.4 crystal with an olivine structure (JCPDS No. 081-1173), and lines in the upper figure are used to indicate the position of the peaks.

(35) As shown in FIG. 4, all the lines indicating the peaks of the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of the present embodiment correspond to the peaks of LiFePO.sub.4 crystal with the olivine structure (JCPDS No. 081-1173), and there are no other peaks observed in the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of the present embodiment. This result indicates that all the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of the present embodiment are LiFePO.sub.4 powders with olivine structures.

Embodiment 2

(36) Preparation of Ferrous (II) Phosphate Powders

(37) H.sub.3PO.sub.4 was added in deionized water (500 ml) to obtain a P-containing precursor solution. Next, NaHCO.sub.3 was added into the P-containing precursor solution to obtain a mixture, in which the molar ratio of H.sub.3PO.sub.4 to NaHCO.sub.3 was 1:3. After the mixture was stirred for 30 min, ferrous sulfate hydrate (FeSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O) and manganese sulfate hydrate (MnSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O) was added into the mixture, wherein the molar ratio of FeSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O to MnSO.sub.4.6H.sub.2O was 9:1, and the molar ratio of the total amount of FeSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O and MgSO.sub.4.6H.sub.2O to H.sub.3PO.sub.4 was 3:2. After the reaction was completed, the product was washed with deionized water, and then collected with centrifugation twice. After the collected product was dried at 55 C. for at least 36 hours, ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders doped with Mn (Fe.sub.2.7Mn.sub.0.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2.8H.sub.2O) were obtained.

(38) The shapes of the ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders doped with Mn of the present embodiment were also observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4000), and the results are shown in FIGS. 5A-5B, which respectively are SEM photos of ferrous (II) phosphate powders observed at the magnification of 10,000 and 50,000. As shown in FIG. 5A, it was observed that the powders are composed of plural flake powders. More specifically, the powders are powders composed of independent flakes, flake powders that one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other to form a connecting center, or flake powders connecting to each other at the center of the flakes. Herein, among the observed ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 0.3-3 m, and most of them is about 1-3 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 10-22 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range from 15 to 300.

(39) Preparation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Powders

(40) Next, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Mn of the present embodiment was used as a precursor, and mixed with Li.sub.3PO.sub.4 in a molar ratio of 1:1. In addition, 15 wt % of sugar was also added in the mixture. The mixture was mixed with a 3D shaker containing 2 mm zirconia balls for 2 hrs to obtain mixed powders. Then, the mixed powders were heat-treated at 750 C., under an atmosphere of N.sub.2 gas for 3 hrs. Finally, lithium iron phosphate powders coated with carbon and doped with Mn (LiFe.sub.0.9Mn.sub.0.1PO.sub.4/C) and which were formed in flake shapes, were obtained.

(41) The shapes of the lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mn of the present embodiment were also observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4000), and the results are shown in FIGS. 6A-6B, which respectively are SEM photos of LiFePO.sub.4 powders observed at the magnification of 20,000 and 50,000. The result shows that the lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mn of the present embodiment have similar shape to that of ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Mn, and especially most of the powders are powders formed in independent flakes; and flake powders that one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other to form a connecting center are secondly observed.

(42) Furthermore, among the observed LiFePO.sub.4 powders, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 0.9-3 m, and most of them is about 1-3 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 7-20 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range from 45 to 430.

Embodiment 3

(43) The ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders doped with Mg of the present embodiment were prepared through the same process as illustrated in Embodiment 2, except that the MnSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O was substituted with magnesium nitrate hydrate (MgN.sub.2O.sub.6.6H.sub.2O) in the present embodiment. In addition, the lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mg of the present embodiment were also prepared through the same process as illustrated in Embodiment 2, except that the ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders doped with Mn used in the Embodiment 2 were substituted with ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders doped with Mg prepared in the present embodiment.

(44) After preparation, ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders doped with Mg (Fe.sub.2.7Mg.sub.0.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2.8H.sub.2O) and lithium iron phosphate powders coated with carbon and doped with Mg (LiFe.sub.0.9Mg.sub.0.1PO.sub.4/C) were obtained.

(45) The shapes of the ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders and lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mg of the present embodiment were also respectively observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4000), and the results thereof are respectively shown in FIGS. 7A-7B and FIGS. 8A-8B. FIGS. 7A and 7B are SEM photos of ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment observed at the magnification of 10,000 and 50,000, respectively; and FIGS. 8A and 8B are SEM photos of LiFePO.sub.4 powders observed at the magnification of 10,000 and 50,000, respectively.

(46) Among the observed ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Mg of the present embodiment, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 0.3-2.5 m, and most of them is about 1-2.5 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 10-22 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range of 14-250.

(47) In addition, among the observed LiFePO.sub.4 powders doped with Mg of the present invention, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 0.75-2.5 m, and most of them is about 1-2.5 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 8-20 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range of 40-300.

(48) In addition, the obtained lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mg of the present embodiment were also examined with an X-ray diffraction microscope (Shimadzu 6000) to understand the crystal structure thereof. The X-ray diffraction pattern was collected by Cu K radiation, the 2-scanning angle is 15-45, and the scanning rate is 1/min. The obtained XRD diffraction pattern is shown in FIG. 9, wherein the upper figure is the XRD diffraction pattern of lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mg of the present embodiment, the lower figure is the XRD diffraction pattern of LiFePO.sub.4 crystal with an olivine structure (JCPDS No. 081-1173), and lines in the upper figure are used to indicate the position of the peaks. The result indicates that all the lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mg of the present embodiment have olivine structures.

Embodiment 4

(49) The ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders doped with Mg and Ni of the present embodiment were prepared through the same process as illustrated in Embodiment 2, except that the MnSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O was substituted with MgN.sub.2O.sub.6.6H.sub.2O and nickel nitrate hydrate (Ni(NO.sub.3).sub.2.6H.sub.2O) and the molar ratio of FeSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O:MgN.sub.2O.sub.6.6H.sub.2O:Ni(NO.sub.3).sub.2.6H.sub.2O was 8:1:1 in the present embodiment. In addition, the lithium iron phosphate powders doped with Mg and Ni of the present embodiment were also prepared through the same process as illustrated in Embodiment 2, except that the ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders doped with Mn used in the Embodiment 2 were substituted with ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders doped with Mg and Ni prepared in the present embodiment.

(50) After preparation, ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders doped with Mg and Ni (Fe.sub.2.4Mg.sub.0.3Ni.sub.0.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2.8H.sub.2O) and lithium iron phosphate powders coated with carbon and doped with Mg and Ni (LiFe.sub.0.8Mg.sub.0.1Ni.sub.0.1PO.sub.4/C) were obtained.

(51) Among the observed ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Mg and Ni of the present embodiment, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 0.3-2.7 m, and most of them is about 1-2.7 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 10-22 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range of 14-270.

(52) In addition, among the observed LiFePO.sub.4 powders doped with Mg and Ni of the present invention, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 0.5-2 m, and most of them is about 1-1.7 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 7-20 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range of 25-300.

(53) The ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Ni and Mg of the present embodiment were analyzed with Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The results show that the atomic ratio of P to Fe (P/(Fe+Ni+Mg)) of the ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Ni and Mg of the present embodiment is 0.39/(0.042+0.49+0.056)=0.663, and that of standard Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2 powders is 2/3=0.667. This result indicates that the synthesized powders doped with Ni and Mg of the present embodiment has similar atomic ratio P/Fe to that of standard Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2 powders, and the deviation thereof is within the experimental range.

(54) In addition, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Ni and Mg of the present embodiment were observed with a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL 2010), and the results (data not shown) show that about 15% of the powders are crystallized ferrous (II) phosphate powders and about 85% thereof are amorphous powders.

(55) The obtained ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped with Mg and Ni of the present embodiment were also examined with an X-ray diffraction microscope (Shimadzu 6000) through the same process as illustrated in Embodiment 1, to understand the crystal structure thereof. The obtained XRD diffraction pattern is shown in FIG. 10, wherein the upper figure is the XRD diffraction pattern of ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present embodiment, the lower figure is the XRD diffraction pattern of ferrous (II) phosphate powders (Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2.8H.sub.2O) JCPDS No. 079-1928.

(56) As shown in FIG. 10, a characteristic peak is indicated by symbols * (*13), and there is a 0.04 right shift between this peak of the powders of the present embodiment and JCPDS standard. Some characteristic peaks are indicated by symbols .diamond-solid. (.diamond-solid.8 and .diamond-solid.14), which indicate that the intensities of these peaks of the powders of the present embodiment are significantly increased in comparison to those of JCPDS standard. The residue characteristic peaks are indicated by symbols #, which indicate that there are at least a 0.12 right shift between these peaks of the powders of the present embodiment and JCPDS standard, and the intensities of these peaks of the powders of the present embodiment are also different from intensities of the closest peaks of JCPDS standard, and some of them have weak intensities. The intensities and the 2 angles () of the powders of the present embodiment and JCPDS standard are summarized in the following Table 1, in which I indicates the peak intensity of the JCPDS standard and the relative intensity of the observed characteristic peaks of the powders of the present embodiment, wherein vs stands for very strong, s for strong, o for ordinary, w for weak, and vw stands for very weak.

(57) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 JCPDS Card Data 079-1928 peak 2 () I 2 () I [%] #1 18.32 vs 18.14 24.5 #2 19.84 o 19.39 11.3 #3 20.72 vw 20.38 4.2 #4 22.12 vw 21.81 10.3 22.48 0.3 #5 23.24 s 23.10 18.4 23.51 1 #6 24.86 vw 24.34 3.9 26.50 0.3 #7 27.08 vw 26.68 2.1 27.76 26.7 #8 28.24 s 28.17 2.3 29.85 19.1 #9 30.32 vs 30.20 13.4 30.84 0.9 32.31 3.5 32.75 17.5 #10 33.34 s 33.05 14.4 #11 34.3 vw 34.00 8.7 34.58 3 35.44 10.9 #12 35.88 w 35.74 5.3 36.76 0.8 *13 37.20 o 37.16 13.4 38.24 0.3 38.76 9.8 39.11 1 39.21 1.3 #14 39.36 w 39.36 0.7 39.59 3.1 40.34 8.4 #15 40.94 w 41.11 7.6 41.44 2.9 #16 41.82 w 41.68 1.2 42.87 1.7 43.29 1.4 43.62 6.9 #17 44.14 vw 44.45 0.4 45.04 2.3

(58) It is known that there might be left shifts of the peaks in the X-ray differaction pattern but the relative intensities thereof are maintained when the lattice constant of the crystal is slightly changed. However, as shown in FIG. 10 and Table 1, there are not only the shifts but also the intensity changes observed in the synthesized ferrous (II) phosphate of the present embodiment. Hence, it can be concluded that the shifts and the intensity changes observed in the synthesized powder of the present embodiment is not only caused by the slight change of the lattice constant of the ferrous (II) phosphate, and the crystal structure thereof is different from that of the standard ferrous (II) phosphate.

(59) In addition, FIG. 11 are XRD diffraction patterns of ferrous (II) phosphate powders doped without or with Ni and Mg according to Embodiments 1 and 4 of the present invention, in which the upper and lower figures are respectively the patterns of powders prepared in Embodiments 1 and 4. It can be found that the intensities and the 20 degrees of the powders prepared in Embodiments 1 and 4 are almost the same. Especially, the signal to noise ratio of Embodiment 4 is higher than that of Embodiment 1, and it is because the crystallization degree of the powders of Embodiment 4 is higher than that of Embodiment 1.

Comparative Embodiment

(60) Preparation of Ferrous (II) Phosphate Powders

(61) H.sub.3PO.sub.4 and NaHCO.sub.3 were mixed in a molar ratio of 1:3, and dissolved in deionized water (200 ml) to obtain a P-containing precursor solution. After the P-containing precursor solution was stirred for 30 mins, ferrous sulfate hydrate (FeSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O) was added into the P-containing precursor solution, wherein the molar ratio of FeSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O to H.sub.3PO.sub.4 was 3:2. After the reaction was completed, the product was washed with an ethanol solution, and then collected with centrifugation for twice. After the collected product was dried at 60 C. for 12 hours, ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders (Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2.8H.sub.2O) were obtained.

(62) The shapes of the ferrous phosphate (II) powders of the present embodiment were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4000), and the results are shown in FIGS. 12A-12C, which are SEM photos of ferrous (II) phosphate powders observed at the magnification of 1,000, 10,000, and 10,000, respectively. As shown in FIG. 12A, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders have flat shapes in macro view. As shown in FIG. 12B, powders composed of independent flakes, and flake powders that one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other to form a connecting center can be observed. As shown in FIG. 12C, flake powders connecting to each other at the center of the flakes can also be observed. Among the observed powders, most of the powders are flake powders that one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other to form a connecting center. In addition, among the observed ferrous (II) phosphate powders, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 3-5 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 120-165 nm, and most of them is about 120-130 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range from 18 to 42.

(63) Herein, the X-ray diffraction pattern thereof was also collected through the same process as those described in Embodiment 1, and the result thereof is shown in FIG. 13, wherein the lines shown in the figure indicate the position of the peaks of ferrous (II) phosphate powders JCPDS No. 079-1928. All the peaks observed in the powders of the present comparative embodiment correspond to those of JCPDS, and there are no other peaks observed in the powders of the present comparative embodiment. This result indicates that all the ferrous (II) phosphate powders prepared according to the present embodiment are indeed ferrous (II) phosphate powders.

(64) Preparation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Powders

(65) Next, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present comparative embodiment was used as a precursor, and mixed with Li.sub.3PO.sub.4 in a molar ratio of 1:1. In addition, 15 wt % of sugar was also added in the mixture. The mixture was mixed with a 3D shaker containing zirconia balls (1 cm) for 2 hr to obtain mixed powders. Then, the mixed powders were heat-treated at 750 C., under an atmosphere of N.sub.2 gas for 3 hrs. Finally, LiFePO.sub.4 powders coated with carbon and which were formed in flake shape, were obtained.

(66) The shapes of the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of the present embodiment were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4000), and the results are shown in FIG. 14, which is a SEM photo of LiFePO.sub.4 powders observed at the magnification of 20,000. It can be found that the sintered LiFePO.sub.4 powders still have similar shape after the heat-treating process to that of the original ferrous (II) phosphate powders, and most of the powders are flake powders that one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other to form a connecting center. Furthermore, among the observed LiFePO.sub.4 powders, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 1.2-2 m, and most of them is about 1.5-1.8 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 35-140 nm, and most of them is about 100-130 nm.

Embodiment 5

(67) Preparation of Ferrous (II) Phosphate Powders

(68) The ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders of the present embodiment were prepared through the same process as illustrated in Embodiment 1, except that ferrous sulfate hydrate (FeSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O) was added slowly into the mixture, and the collected product was dried at 55 C. for 36 hours. The obtained ferrous (II) phosphate precursor powders have different length and thickness.

(69) The shapes of the ferrous phosphate (II) powders of the present embodiment were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4000), and the results are shown in FIGS. 15A-15B, which are SEM photos of ferrous (II) phosphate powders observed at the magnification of 10,000, and 50,000, respectively. As shown in FIG. 15A, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders have flat shapes in macro view. As shown in FIG. 15B, powders composed of independent flakes and flake powders in which one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other to form a connecting center are observed. Among the observed powders shown in FIGS. 15A-15B, most of the powders are powders formed in independent flakes; and flake powders that one end of each of the flake powders connects to each other to form a connecting center are secondly observed. Furthermore, among the observed ferrous (II) phosphate powders, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 0.9-2.6 m, and most of them is about 1.5-2 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 29-35 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range from 25 to 90.

(70) Herein, the X-ray diffraction pattern thereof was also collected through the same process as that described in Embodiment 1, and the result thereof is shown in FIG. 16, wherein the lines shown in the figure indicate the position of the peaks of ferrous (II) phosphate powders JCPDS No. 079-1928. As shown in FIG. 16, only one characteristic peak is indicated by the symbol *, which indicates that this peak of the powders of the present embodiment corresponds to the peak of ferrous (II) phosphate powders (Fe.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2.8H.sub.2O) (JCPDS No. 079-1928). Other characteristic peaks observed in the powders of the present embodiment cannot consistently correspond to those of JCPDS but have similar 2 angles to those observed in the powders of Embodiment 4. This result indicates that the crystal structure of the powders of Embodiment 4 and the present embodiment is different from that of the standard ferrous (II) phosphate (JCPDS No. 079-1928).

(71) In addition, as shown in FIG. 13, the signal to noise ratio of the present embodiment is higher than that of Embodiment 1, and it is because the thickness of the powders of the present embodiment is larger than that of Embodiment 1.

(72) Preparation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Powders

(73) The lithium iron phosphate powders of the present embodiment were also prepared through the same process as illustrated in Comparative Embodiment, except that the ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the Comparative Embodiment was substituted with those of the present embodiment, and the 1 cm zirconia balls were substituted with 2 mm zirconia balls.

(74) The shapes of the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of the present embodiment were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4000), and the results are shown in FIGS. 17A-17D, which are SEM photos of LiFePO.sub.4 powders observed at the magnification of 50,000. As shown in FIGS. 17A-17D, the sintered LiFePO.sub.4 powders still have similar shape after the heat-treating process to that of the original ferrous (II) phosphate powders. As shown in FIGS. 17A-17D, flake powders with partially cured peripheries can be found, some of the flake powders are transparent or semi-transparent, and most of the powders are powders formed in independent flakes. In addition, even though the time for performing the sintering process is short, all the ferrous (II) phosphate powders can be transformed into LiFePO.sub.4, due to the uniform and small grain size of the ferrous (II) phosphate powders. Furthermore, among the observed LiFePO.sub.4 powders, 90% of them have flake shapes and the thickness thereof is thicker than that of ferrous (II) phosphate powders. In addition, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 0.5-1.5 m, and most of them is about 0.5-1 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 34-45 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range from 11 to 45. Furthermore, 10% of the flake powder has a thickness of about 15 nm.

Embodiment 6

(75) Preparation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Powders

(76) The lithium iron phosphate powders of the present embodiment were also prepared through the same process as illustrated in Comparative Embodiment, except that the ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the Comparative Embodiment was substituted with those of Embodiment 1, and the 1 cm zirconia balls were substituted with 0.8 mm zirconia balls.

(77) The shapes of the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of the present embodiment were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4000), and the results are shown in FIG. 18, which is a SEM photo of LiFePO.sub.4 powders observed at the magnification of 50,000.

(78) As shown in FIG. 18, the sintered LiFePO.sub.4 powders still have similar shape after the heat-treating process to that of the original ferrous (II) phosphate powders. As shown in FIG. 18, flake powders with partially cured peripheries can be found, some of the flake powders are transparent or semi-transparent, and most of the powders are powders formed in independent flakes. In addition, even though the time for performing the sintering process is short, all the ferrous (II) phosphate powders can be transformed into LiFePO.sub.4, due to the uniform and small grain size of the ferrous (II) phosphate powders. Furthermore, among the observed LiFePO.sub.4 powders, the length thereof is shorter than that of ferrous (II) phosphate powders, and the thickness thereof is thinner than that of ferrous (II) phosphate powders. In addition, the length (L) of each of the flake powders is about 0.2-1.7 m, and most of them is about 0.4-1.1 m. The thickness (d) of each of the flake powders is about 7-9 nm. After calculation, the ratio of the length to the thickness (L/d) is approximately in a range from 20 to 250.

(79) In addition, the X-ray diffraction patterns of LiFePO.sub.4 powders obtained in Embodiments 5 and 6, and Comparative Embodiment were also collected through the same process as that described in Embodiment 1, and the result thereof is shown in FIG. 19, wherein the lines shown in the figure indicate the position of the peaks of LiFePO.sub.4 (JCPDS No. 081-1173). As shown in FIG. 19, all the lines indicating the peaks of the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of Embodiments 5 and 6, and Comparative Embodiment correspond to the peaks of LiFePO.sub.4 crystal with the olivine structure (JCPDS No. 081-1173), and there are no other peaks observed in the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of Embodiments 5 and 6, and Comparative Embodiment. This result indicates that all the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of the Embodiments 5 and 6, and Comparative Embodiment are LiFePO.sub.4 powders with olivine structures.

(80) According to the results of Embodiments 1-5, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders have small and uniform grain size. When these ferrous (II) phosphate powders are used as a precursor for preparing lithium ion phosphate powders, the time for the heat-treating process can be shortened. Hence, the cost for manufacturing the Li-ion batteries can be further reduced. In addition, the sintered lithium ion phosphate powders have similar shape to that of ferrous (II) phosphate powders, so the sintered lithium ion phosphate powders also have small and uniform grain size. Hence, the grinding process and the sieving process can be omitted during the process for preparing the cathode materials, so the cost of Li-ion batteries can be reduced. Furthermore, the lithium iron phosphate powders of the present invention have nano, micro, or sub-micro grain size. When the lithium iron phosphate powders of the present invention are used as cathode materials of Li-ion batteries, the Li-ion batteries can exhibit uniform charging and discharging current, and excellent charge/discharge efficiency. Hence, not only the cost of the Li-ion batteries can be reduced, but also the charge/discharge time can be shortened and the capacity of the batteries can be further improved.

(81) Preparation and Testing of Li-Ion Batteries

(82) The Li-ion battery of the present invention was prepared through the conventional manufacturing method thereof. Briefly, PVDF, LiFePO.sub.4 prepared in Embodiments 1, 5-6, or Comparative Embodiment of the present embodiment, ZrO, KS-6 [TIMCAL] and Super-P [TIMCAL] were dried in a vacuum oven for 24 hr, and a weight ratio of LiFePO.sub.4:PVDF:KS-6:Super-P was 85:10:3:2. Next, the aforementioned materials were mixed with a 3D miller containing NMP to obtain slurry. An Al foil was provided and coated with the slurry through a blade coating process, and then placed in a vacuum oven at 90 C. for 12 hr. The dried foil coated with the slurry was pressed by a roller, and cut into 13 mm circular plates.

(83) Next, as shown in FIG. 20, an upper cap 17, a lower cap 11, a widemouth plate 16, a pad 15, the aforementioned circular plate 12 with the slurry coated on a surface 121 thereof, and a 18 mm separator 13 are placed in a vacuum oven at 90 C. for 24 hr, and then placed into a glove box with less than 1 ppm of water and O.sub.2 under Ar environment. After immersing the circular plate 12, and the separator 13 with electrolyte, the circular plate 12, the separator 13, a Li-plate 14, the pad 15, the widemouth plate 16 and the upper cap 17 were sequentially laminated on the lower cap 11, as shown in FIG. 20. After pressing and sealing, a CR2032 coin type Li-ion battery was obtained, and tested after 12-30 hr.

(84) The obtained Li-ion batteries prepared by LiFePO.sub.4 of Embodiments 1, 5-6, or Comparative Embodiment were tested with automatic cell charge-discharge test system (AcuTech Systems BAT-750B). First, the batteries were activated, and charged with constant voltage 3.65V, 0.1 C. When the charge current was less than 0.02 mA or the charging capacity reached 2 mAh, the batteries were discharged with constant current 0.1 C until the voltage thereof was 2V. After the aforementioned steps were performed for several times, the constant voltage for charging was increased to 3.9V, and the other conditions were maintained. After the steps were performed using the constant voltage of 3.9V for several times, the constant voltage for charging was further increased to 4.2 V, and the other conditions were maintained. After the steps were performed using the constant voltage of 4.2V for several times, the charging current was sequentially increased to 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 0.75 C and 1 C, and the other conditions were maintained. The batteries charged with different charge current were tested after the batteries were charged and discharged for several times.

(85) After the Li-ion batteries were charged with constant voltage 4.2V, 0.75 C, and the discharge testing were performed at three different constant current (0.1 C, 0.2 C and 0.5 C) when the charge current was less than 0.02 mA. The discharge was set to stop when the voltage of the constant current discharge was 2V, and each discharge current was tested by two charge/discharge cycles. The results thereof are shown in FIG. 21.

(86) As shown in FIG. 21, the discharge capacities of the batteries prepared with the LiFePO.sub.4 of Comparative Embodiment (thickness=100-130 nm) decreased from 83 mAh/g of 0.1 C discharge current, 81 mAh/g of 0.2 C discharge current, to 76 mAh/g of 0.5 C discharging current. The discharge capacities of the batteries prepared with the LiFePO.sub.4 of Embodiment 5 (thickness=34-45 nm) decreased from 131 mAh/g of 0.1 C discharge current, 130 mAh/g of 0.2 C discharge current, to 121 mAh/g of 0.5 C discharge current. The discharge capacities of the batteries prepared with the LiFePO.sub.4 of Embodiment 1 (thickness=8-20 nm) decreased from 152 mAh/g of 0.1 C discharge current, 138 mAh/g of 0.2 C discharge current, to 129 mAh/g of 0.5 C discharge current. In addition, the discharge capacities of the batteries prepared with the LiFePO.sub.4 of Embodiment 6 (thickness=7-9 nm) decreased from 164 mAh/g of 0.1 C discharge current, 158 mAh/g of 0.2 C discharge current, to 145 mAh/g of 0.5 C discharge current.

(87) Although the XRD patterns of the LiFePO.sub.4 of Embodiments 1, 5-6, and Comparative Embodiment are almost the same (as shown in FIG. 19), the Li-ion batteries prepared with the same have different performances (as shown in FIG. 21). These results indicate that the performances of the batteries are highly related to the sizes and the shapes of the LiFePO.sub.4 powders.

(88) It should be noted that the LiFePO.sub.4 powders of Embodiment 6 has the smallest thickness and length, and the Li-ion batteries prepared with the same has the highest specific capacity. Especially, the specific capacity thereof under 0.1 C discharge current was about 164 mAh/g, which is close to the theoretical value of 170 mAh/g; and showed better performance than that prepared with LiFePO.sub.4 of Comparative Embodiment (83 mAh/g under 0.1 C discharge current). These results indicate that the specific capacities of the Li-ion batteries are highly related to the thickness of the LiFePO.sub.4 flake powders, and the specific capacities thereof are increased as the thickness of the powders decreased.

(89) FIG. 22 shows the specific capacities of a Li-ion battery prepared with lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiment 5 of the present invention, wherein the solid dots and the circles respectively indicate the discharge capacities under 0.1 C and 0.2 C. The discharge current of different cycle may be varied. The charge current was 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 0.75 C or 1 C and the discharge current was mostly 0.1 C at 1-50 cycles and after 170 cycles. The charge current was mostly 0.75 C and the discharge current was mostly 0.2 C at 51-170 cycles and 375-390 cycles. As shown in FIG. 22, there is no significant decay of specific capacities observed in the Li-ion battery prepared with the LiFePO.sub.4 of Embodiment 5 after charge and discharge for 390 cycles.

(90) FIG. 23 shows the relation between the voltage and the specific capacities of a Li-ion battery prepared with lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiment 5 of the present invention, which was tested by the same charge and discharge current (0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 0.75 C and 1 C) at 27-36 cycles. From the results shown in FIG. 23, it can be found that the voltages of the batteries can be maintained during the charge and discharge process, and there are no significant difference observed between the voltages of the charge and the discharge process. These results indicate the polarization is not significant in the Li-ion battery prepared with lithium iron phosphate powders according to Embodiment 5 of the present invention.

(91) In conclusion, the ferrous (II) phosphate powders of the present invention have thin thickness, and high length to thickness ratio. Hence, the time for preparing LiFePO.sub.4 powders can be greatly reduced. In addition, when the obtained LiFePO.sub.4 powders are further applied to prepare Li-ion batteries, the performance of the batteries can be greatly improved.

(92) Although the present invention has been explained in relation to its preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that many other possible modifications and variations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed.