Integrated system for hydrogen and methane production from industrial organic wastes and biomass

Abstract

The present invention provides a system that has been devised to overcome the two most important limitations for sustained biological hydrogen production, namely contamination of the microbial hydrogen-producing cultures with methane-producing cultures necessitating frequent re-start-up and/or other methanogenic bacteria inactivation techniques, and the low bacterial yield of hydrogen-producers culminating in microbial washout from the system and failure. The system includes a continuously stirred bioreactor (CSTR) for biological hydrogen production, followed by a gravity settler positioned downstream of the CSTR, which combination forms a biohydrogenator. The biomass concentration in the hydrogen reactor is kept at the desired range through biomass recirculation from the bottom of the gravity settler and/or biomass wastage from the gravity settler's underflow. The gravity setter effluent is loaded with volatile fatty acids, as a result of microbiological breakdown of the influent waste constituents by hydrogen-producing bacteria, and is an excellent substrate for methane-forming bacteria in the downstream biomethanator.

Claims

1. An apparatus for producing hydrogen from bio-organic material, comprising: a) a biohydrogenator including a completely mixed bioreactor, the bioreactor containing a mixture of microorganisms from anaerobically digested sludge, the mixture of microorganisms including hydrogen producing microorganisms, the bioreactor having a reactor input for receiving bio-organic material into said completely mixed bioreactor, a reactor output for draining a first liquid effluent from the bioreactor, the first liquid effluent containing a mixture of volatile fatty acids and primary alcohols and hydrogen producing microorganisms, and a means for continuously emitting hydrogen gas and carbon dioxide gas from the bioreactor; b) a gravity settler located downstream of said completely mixed bioreactor for separating hydrogen producing microorganisms from the first liquid effluent and concentrating the separated microorganisms, the gravity settler having a settler input hydraulically connected with the reactor output for receiving the first liquid effluent, a feedback conduit connecting a bottom of the gravity settler to the completely mixed bioreactor for recirculating concentrated separated microorganisms from said gravity settler to the reactor input an output conduit from the bottom of said gravity settler for discharging of excess biomass, a settler output for draining a second liquid effluent from the gravity settler, the second liquid effluent containing predominantly the volatile fatty acids and the primary alcohol; and c) wherein the bio-organic material entering the completely mixed bioreactor is continuously broken down microbiologically by said hydrogen producing microorganisms in the completely mixed bioreactor to predominantly hydrogen gas and carbon dioxide gas continuously emitted from the completely mixed bioreactor, and wherein in the gravity settler the hydrogen producing microorganisms settle to the bottom of the gravity settler and are concentrated in the gravity settler while the second liquid effluent is discharged from the gravity settler and wherein settled and concentrated hydrogen producing microorganisms at the bottom of the gravity settler are recirculated through the feedback conduit back to into the completely mixed bioreactor thereby decoupling a solid retention time in the completely mixed bioreactor of the hydrogen producing microorganisms from a hydraulic retention time in the completely mixed bioreactor.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising temperature controllers associated with the completely mixed bioreactor for controlling a temperature of the contents of the completely mixed bioreactor.

3. The apparatus according to claim 1 wherein the hydrogen producing microorganisms include any one or combination of Clostridium acetobutyricum, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Clostridium butyricum.

4. The apparatus according to claim 1, including a storage tank hydraulically connected to the gravity settler and located downstream of the gravity settler for receiving the liquid effluent discharged from the gravity settler and containing predominantly the volatile fatty acids and primary alcohols.

5. The apparatus of claim 4, further including a biomethanator located downstream of said gravity settler and hydraulically connected with said storage tank for receiving the liquid effluent from the gravity settler containing predominantly the volatile fatty acids and primary alcohols and for the adjustment of loading rates of the liquids entering the biomethanator.

6. The apparatus according to claim 5, including a dispenser for dispensing chemicals into the storage tank for adjusting alkalinity of the liquid in said storage tank.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings, in which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the present system for employing the method of present invention;

(3) FIG. 2 shows temporal variation of effluent COD during synthetic leachate treatment using the system of FIG. 1;

(4) FIG. 3 shows the temporal variation of COD removal efficiency during synthetic leachate treatment;

(5) FIG. 4 shows the temporal variation of hydrogen yield during synthetic leachate treatment;

(6) FIG. 5 shows the hydrogen production rate during synthetic leachate treatment;

(7) FIG. 6 shows methane yield during synthetic leachate treatment; and

(8) FIG. 7 shows the volumetric hydrogen production rate and molar hydrogen yield as a function of organic loading for a study involving treatment of waste including corn-syrup.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(9) Generally speaking, the embodiments described herein are directed to integrated system for hydrogen and methane production from industrial organic wastes and biomass. As required, embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein. However, the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary, and it should be understood that the invention may be embodied in many various and alternative forms.

(10) The figures are not to scale and some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular elements while related elements may have been eliminated to prevent obscuring novel aspects. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention. For purposes of teaching and not limitation, integrated system for hydrogen and methane production from industrial organic wastes and biomass is disclosed herein.

(11) As used herein, the terms about, and approximately when used in conjunction with ranges of dimensions, concentrations, temperatures or other physical or chemical properties or characteristics is meant to cover slight variations that may exist in the upper and lower limits of the ranges of properties/characteristics.

(12) As used herein, the phrase completely mixed bioreactor means a mechanically or hydraulically agitated vessel including microorganisms in suspension and a growth media, typically comprised of nutrients such as organic carbon, nitrogen-containing compounds, phosphorous-containing compounds, and trace mineral solutions.

(13) As used herein, the term biomethanator means any of the common designs used for the anaerobic conversion of organic wastes to methane and carbon dioxide. Biomethanators that include, but are not limited to, single or multi-stage continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTR), up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB) where in the waste stream flows upwards through an anaerobic compacted bed of granular sludge, expanded bed granular sludge blanket (EGSB) in which waste flows upwards through an anaerobic expanded granular sludge, down-flow or up-flow anaerobic granular media reactors, anaerobic baffled tank reactor (ABR) and anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR).

(14) As used herein, the phrase hydrogen producing microorganisms means microorganisms capable of fermenting organics under anaerobic conditions to produce hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and a variety of organic acids and alcohols.

(15) As used herein, the phrase organic waste refers to wastes that include carbon and hydrogen such as, but are not limited to, alcohols, ketones aldehydes, volatile fatty acids, esters, carboxylic acids, ethers, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, polysaccharides, monosaccharide, cellulose, and nucleic acids.

(16) Referring to FIG. 1, an apparatus 10 for producing hydrogen and methane from organic waste is shown. Apparatus 10 comprises a biohydrogenator 12 which includes a completely mixed bioreactor 14 (also referred to above as a continuously stirred reactor (CSTR)) having an input for receiving organic waste into the completely mixed bioreactor 14. The biohydrogenator 12 includes a gravity settler 16 is located downstream of the completely mixed bioreactor 14 and hydraulically connected with an output of the completely mixed bioreactor 14 for receiving an output from the completely mixed bioreactor 14. System 10 includes hydrogen producing microorganisms located in the completely mixed bioreactor 14 which are utilized to break down the organic waste.

(17) System 10 includes a feedback conduit 20 connecting a bottom of the gravity settler 16 to the completely mixed bioreactor 14 for recirculating settled biomass from the gravity settler 16 to the completely mixed bioreactor 14. There is included an output conduit 24 from the bottom of the gravity settler 16 for discharging of excess biomass (excess biomass wastage in FIG. 1).

(18) The system includes a biomethanator 22 located downstream of the gravity settler 16 and hydraulically connected with an output of the gravity settler 16. In operation, the organic waste (labelled organic waste in FIG. 1) entering the biohydrogenator 12 is broken down microbiologically by hydrogen producing microorganisms to predominantly hydrogen gas and carbon dioxide, and a mixture of volatile fatty acids and primary alcohols in the completely mixed bioreactor 14. The hydrogen gas (H.sub.2) and carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) are emitted from the completely mixed bioreactor 14, and a liquid effluent containing the volatile fatty acids, primary alcohols and hydrogen producing microorganisms flow to the gravity settler 16 and when in the gravity settler 16 the hydrogen producing microorganisms settle to the bottom of the gravity settler 16 and are concentrated in the gravity settler 16. The liquid effluent containing predominantly the volatile fatty acids and the primary alcohols flow into the biomethanator 22 wherein the volatile fatty acids and the primary alcohols are broken down microbiologically predominantly to methane gas and carbon dioxide, and wherein settled hydrogen producing microorganisms in the bottom of the gravity settler 16 are recirculated back to the completely mixed bioreactor 14. The methane gas and carbon dioxide produced in the biomethanator 22 are emitted and liquid waste containing residual organics are discharged from the biomethanator 22.

(19) The common designs for the anaerobic treatment biomethanators 22 which may be used in the present system include, but are not limited to, single or multi-stage continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTR), up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB) where in the waste stream flows upwards through an anaerobic compacted bed of granular sludge, expanded bed granular sludge blanket (EGSB) in which waste flows upwards through an anaerobic expanded granular sludge, down-flow or up-flow anaerobic granular media reactors, anaerobic baffled tank reactor (ABR) and anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR).

(20) Optionally, apparatus 10 may include a storage tank 26 hydraulically connected to the gravity settler 16 located downstream of the gravity settler 16 and which is located upstream of the biomethanator 22 and hydraulically connected to both the settler 16 and biomethanator 22 for adjusting loading rates of the liquids entering the biomethanator 22.

(21) The apparatus may include a dispenser for dispensing chemicals into the storage tank 26 for adjusting alkalinity and pH of the liquid in the storage tank 26.

(22) The apparatus also preferably includes temperature controllers for controlling the temperature in the completely mixed bioreactor 14 and in the biomethanator 22. A typical temperature range in which the temperature of the contents of both bioreactor 14 and biomethanator 22 is maintained is between from about 20 C. to about 70 C.

(23) The apparatus may also include dispensing means for dispensing nutrients and pH adjustment compounds into the completely mixed bioreactor 14. The nutrients may be, but are not limited to, any one or combination of nitrogen containing compounds, phosphorous containing compounds, trace metals including iron, manganese, magnesium, calcium, cobalt, zinc, nickel, and copper. The pH adjustment compounds include, but are not limited to soda ash, sodium bicarbonate, sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, nitric acid, and hydrochloric acid.

(24) Examples of hydrogen generating microorganisms include, but are not limited to, C. acetobutyricum, Bacillus thuringiensis, and C. butyricum.

(25) Examples of pH adjustment compounds include, but are not limited to soda ash, sodium bicarbonate, sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, nitric acid, and hydrochloric acid.

(26) System B in FIG. 1, is just the completely mixed bioreactor 14, which when connected directly to the biomethanator 22 gives the current or prior art system in use.

(27) The present invention will now be illustrated using the following non-limiting examples.

(28) Materials and Methods

(29) 1. Synthetic Leachate

(30) Two lab-scale systems were operated at 37 C. for 25 days using systems A and B in FIG. 1 as described above. System A includes a hydrogen CSTR 14, a methane CSTR 22, intermediate gravity settler 16 and storage tank 26 to give the system 10 of the present invention, as described above. System B includes a hydrogen CSTR only which is the Prior Art system. Details of the operational conditions are listed in Table 1.

(31) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Summary of results Hydrogen Gas Methane Gas COD Yield (mol Yield Bioreactor R degradation Content H.sub.2/mol Content (ml CH.sub.4/ System HRT SRT (%) (%) (%) glucose) (%) gCOD) System A, 8 hr 2.2 d 100 49 1.8 43 3.6 2.4 0.3 Stage (1) System A, 10 d 10 d 77 3.6 56 8.1 299 67.4 Stage (2) System B 8 hr 8 hr 32 21.8 25 7.6 1.3 0.8 Run (1) System B 2.2 d 2.2 d 36 19 11 6.1 1.1 0.5 Run (2)

(32) The experimental plan comprised two phases: phase 1 when both systems were run at an HRT of 8 h, and phase 2, when system B was switched to an HRT of 2.2 d. The systems were monitored for total COD, soluble COD, VFA, glucose, VSS, TSS and biogas composition including hydrogen, methane and nitrogen. Anaerobically-digested sludge from St. Marys wastewater treatment plant, Ontario, was used as the seed. Before startup, a portion of the sludge was preheated to 70 C. for 30 minutes to inhibit non spore forming methanogens. The feed was a synthetic leachate characterized by: 7.8 g/l of COD consisting mainly of acetic acid 3.5 ml/l; and glucose 3.5 g/l; NaHCO.sub.3:0.2 g/l; CaCl.sub.2:0.14 g/l; MgCl.sub.2.6H.sub.2O:0.16 g/l; NH.sub.4HCO.sub.3:0.60 g/l; MgSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2O:0.16 g/l; urea:1.3 g/l; Na.sub.2CO.sub.3:0.124 g/l; KHCO.sub.3:0.156 g/l; K.sub.2HPO.sub.4:0.015 g/l; trace mineral solution: 0.5 g/l; H.sub.3PO.sub.4: 0.44 g/l.

(33) Results and Discussion: COD Degradation

(34) As shown in FIG. 2, during steady state the hydrogen reactor in System A achieved complete glucose degradation, with an average effluent CODs of 4000 mg/l and 928 mg/l in stages 1 and 2, predominantly acetic acid. An overall COD removal efficiency of 88% was achieved in System A as shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 3 shows the failure of System B in COD removal efficiency after 5 days from startup at an HRT of 8 h. The biomass concentration in the hydrogen reactor at the startup was 14 gVSS/l and decreased to 0.2 gVSS/l at the end of the run due to biomass washout, with average effluent COD of 5274 mg/l and glucose degradation efficiency of only 62%. The system was subsequently restarted at an HRT of 2.2 d to mitigate biomass washout, but failed again with biomass concentration decreasing from 15 gVSS/l at startup to 0.5 gVSS/l after 9 days.

(35) Hydrogen and Methane Production

(36) Table 1 summarizes the hydrogen production for the two systems while the temporal variations are illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5. In the new System A disclosed herein, the first reactor steadily produced hydrogen with, no methane. As depicted in FIG. 4, the maximum hydrogen yield was 397 ml H.sub.2/g glucose with an average of 341 ml H.sub.2/g glucose, as compared to 141 and 118 ml H.sub.2/g glucose for run 1 and 2 in System B. The maximum and average hydrogen production rates in system A were 20.2 and 17.4 L H.sub.2/d (FIG. 5), the maximum yield was 2.82 mol H.sub.2/mol glucose higher than 1.6-2.3 mol H.sub.2/mol glucose reported for continuous-flow reactors (Zhang et al., 2006).

(37) FIG. 6 shows that the maximum methane yield for the second stage approached the theoretical value of 393 L CH.sub.4/gCOD removed. Based on extensive literature searching using Scifinder Scholar, the inventors have noted to the best of their ability that the concept of using a gravity settler for decoupling SRT from HRT has not been disclosed. Thus, the use of a gravity settler after a hydrogen reactor for decoupling SRT from HRT through sludge recirculation is disclosed herein for the first time. In addition, an integrated hydrogen/methane production system for the treatment of industrial organic wastes and biomass is provided.

(38) 2. Real Waste

(39) The biohydrogenator was operated for 100 days at 37 C., hydraulic retention time 8 h and solids retention time ranging from 2.2-2.5 days. The feed was a corn-syrup waste generated as a by-product from an industrial facility for bioethanol production located in South Western Ontario, Canada. The system was initially started up with a synthetic feed containing glucose at concentration of 8 g/L and other essential in-organics. Anaerobicaly-digested sludge from the St. Mary's wastewater treatment plant (St. Mary, Ontario, Canada) was used as the seed, and was heat treated at 70 C. for 30 minutes to inhibit methanogens. After 10 days, when the hydrogen production was steady, the corn-syrup waste was introduced to the system. Glucose was the main constituent in the corn-syrup; its concentration was varied over a period of 90 days from 8 to 25 g/L. The change in glucose concentration was used to study the impact of variable organic loading on the stability of hydrogen production in the biohydrogenator. As apparent from FIG. 7 the hydrogen yield was stable at 3 mol H.sub.2/mol glucose while the volumetric hydrogen production rate increased from 10 L H.sub.2/L/d to 34 L H.sub.2/L/d with the increase of organic loading rate (OLR) from 26 to 81 gCOD/L/d. A maximum hydrogen yield of 430 mL H.sub.2/gCOD was achieved in the system with an overall average of 385 mL H.sub.2/gCOD.

(40) 3. Comparative Study

(41) This study compared biological hydrogen production from glucose in two continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTR) and two biohydrogenators. The four systems were operated at organic loading rates of 6.5-42.8 gCOD/l-d, and HRTs of 8-12 hours. The SRT was maintained at 2 days in the two IBRCSs. The decoupling of SRT from HRT not only increased glucose conversion from 29-50% in the CSTR to 99.9% in the biohydrogenators, but also the volumetric hydrogen production from 0.55-1.8 in the CSTRs to 2.4-9.6 l/l-d. Biomass yields in the two biohydrogenators were 0.09 and 0.13 g VSS/g glucose converted, about 50% lower than the CSTR yields of 0.19 and 0.29 g VSS/g glucose converted. Hydrogen yield increased from 0.5-1.0 mol H.sub.2/mol glucose converted in the CSTR to 2.8 mol H.sub.2/mol glucose converted in the biohydrogenators. The inverse relationship between hydrogen yield and biomass yield observed in this study implies that the hydrogen yield is maximized with the minimization of biomass yield, thus necessitating decoupling of SRT from HRT to ensure sufficient reactor biomass. DGGE analysis confirmed the specificity of the microbial culture in the biohydrogenators with the presence of the high hydrogen producing Clostridium species, as compared to the more diverse cultures in the CSTR.

(42) In summary, the method and apparatus disclosed herein for hydrogen and methane production from industrial organic wastes and biomass is very advantageous for several reasons. Various surprising synergistic effects were obtained as follows.

(43) Decoupling of the sludge retention time (SRT) from the hydraulic retention time (HRT) through solids/liquid separation (using for example the gravity settler) for the hydrogen-producing bioreactor, and subsequent sludge recirculation to the hydrogen reactor, allows for operation at high biomass concentrations. The present method also surprisingly provides higher hydrogen production rates as compared with conventional completely-mixed bioreactors. The present method also provides higher hydrogen yield per mole of influent COD converted. In addition, the present method provides long-term sustainability of the system for continuous hydrogen and methane production.

(44) The gravity settler effluent is loaded with volatile fatty acids, as a result of microbiological breakdown of the influent waste constituents by hydrogen-producing bacteria, and is an excellent substrate for methane-forming bacteria. Through the production of volatile fatty acids, the studies disclosed herein clearly show that the biohydrogenator drastically improves the efficiency of the second-stage biomethanator, increasing the volumetric methane production rate, methane yield, and solids destruction efficiency, thus allowing for higher volumetric and organic loading rates. It must be asserted that the aforementioned beneficial impact of the biohydrogenator on the second-stage anaerobic treatment process is independent of the second-stage biomethanator reactor design and/or configuration.

(45) Finally, the present method provides a COD removal up to 90%, and energy recovery from waste and the ability to handle high organic loadings.

(46) As used herein, the terms comprises, comprising, includes and including are to be construed as being inclusive and open ended, and not exclusive. Specifically, when used in this specification including claims, the terms comprises, comprising, includes and including and variations thereof mean the specified features, steps or components are included. These terms are not to be interpreted to exclude the presence of other features, steps or components.

(47) The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented to illustrate the principles of the invention and not to limit the invention to the particular embodiment illustrated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by all of the embodiments encompassed within the following claims and their equivalents.

REFERENCES

(48) Chang, J. S., Lee, K. S., and Lin, P. J., (2002) Biohydrogen production with fixed-bed bioreactors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 27 (11/12), 1167-1174. Das, D., Khanna, N., Veziroglu, T. N., (2008) Recent developments in biological hydrogen production processes. Chem Ind. And chem. Eng. 14 (2), 57-67. Horiuchi J. I., Shimizu T., Tada K., Kanno T., Kobayashi M., (2002) Selective production of organic acids in anaerobic acid reactor by pH control. Bioresource Technol 82,209-13. Li, C., Fang, H. H. P., (2007) Fermentative hydrogen production from wastewater and solid wastes by mixed cultures. Critical reviews in Env. Sci. and Tech., 37, 1-39. Matsunaga, T., Hatano, T., Yamada, A., Matsumoto, M., (2000) Microaerobic hydrogen production by photosythetic bacteria in a double phase photobioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68 (6), 647-651. Vallero, M. V. G., Lettinga, G., and Lens, P. N. L., (2005) High rate sulfate reduction in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBaR) at high alinity. J. Membr. Sci. 253(1/2), 217-232. Wu, S. Y., Hung, C. H., Lin, C. Y., Lin, P. J., Lee, K. S., Lin, C. N., Chang, F. Y. And Chang, J. S. (2008) HRT-dependent hydrogen production and bacterial community structure of mixed anaerobic microflora in suspended, granular and immobilized sludge systems using glucose as the carbon substrate. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33, 1542-1549. Zhang, H., Mary, A. B., Bruce, E. L., (2006) Biological hydrogen production by clostridium acetobutylicum in an unsaturated flow reactor. Water Research 40, 728-734.