SYSTEM FOR DETECTING A PARTIAL OR TOTAL OBSTRUCTION OF AT LEAST ONE INTERNAL PIPE OF A TOOL

Abstract

The invention primarily relates to a system (10) for detecting a total or partial obstruction of at least one internal fluid pipe (11) of a tool (12), characterised in that said system (10) comprises: a pneumatic system (13) that is intended to be connected upstream of said internal pipe (11) of said tool (12), a pressure source (16) that is connected to said pneumatic system (13) by means of a solenoid valve (17), and a control unit (22) that is configured to open said solenoid valve (17) so as to pressurise said pneumatic system (13), and then to close said solenoid valve (17) so as to let said pneumatic system (13) be emptied freely by means of said internal pipe (11), and to detect an obstruction state of said internal pipe (11) depending on an analysis over time of a change in the pressure in said pneumatic system (13).

Claims

1. A system for detecting a total or partial obstruction of at least one internal fluid pipe of a tool, wherein said system comprises: a pneumatic system that is intended to be connected upstream from said at least one internal pipe of said tool, a pressure source that is connected to said pneumatic system by means of a solenoid valve, and a control unit that is configured to open said solenoid valve so as to pressurize said pneumatic system, then to close said solenoid valve so as to let said pneumatic system be emptied freely by means of said internal pipe, and means for detecting an obstruction state of said internal pipe based on an analysis over time of a change of the pressure in said pneumatic system following the closing of said solenoid valve.

2. The system according to claim 1, wherein the analysis over time of the change of the pressure comprises measuring a length of time (T1-T3) taken by the pneumatic system to return to the ambient pressure (Pa) after closing of said solenoid valve.

3. The system according to claim 1, wherein the analysis over time of the change in pressure comprises measuring a pressure difference (P1-P3) between the pressure at the time of closing said solenoid valve and the pressure at the end of a length of time (Tsec) beginning from the closing of said solenoid valve.

4. The system according to claim 1, wherein the analysis over time of the change of the pressure comprises measuring a duration (T1-T3) necessary for said pneumatic system to reach a fixed target pressure (Pc) after closing of said solenoid valve.

5. The system according to claim 4, wherein the fixed target pressure (Pc) is greater than the ambient pressure (Pa) and less than the pressure (Ps) of said pressure source.

6. The system according to claim 1, wherein the analysis over time of the change of the pressure comprises determining a drift slope (P/dt(C1)-P/dt(C3)) of a pressure change curve (C1-C3) in said pneumatic system as a function of time following closing of said solenoid valve.

7. The system according to claim 1, wherein said system further includes an electronic chip reader for automatic identification of said tool whose internal pipe must be controlled.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0014] The invention will be better understood upon reading the following description and examining the accompanying figures. These figures are provided purely as an illustration, and are not limiting with respect to the invention.

[0015] FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a system for detecting the partial or total obstruction of an internal pipe of a tool according to the present invention;

[0016] FIGS. 2a to 2d illustrate different types of analysis over time of the change of pressure in the pneumatic system that may be implemented by the system for detecting the partial or total obstruction of the internal pipe of a tool according to the present invention.

[0017] Identical, similar or analogous elements retain the same reference from one figure to the next.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0018] FIG. 1 shows a system 10 for detecting a total or partial obstruction of at least one internal fluid pipe 11 of a tool 12, such as a machining tool. The internal pipe(s) 11 to be controlled may for example be used to supply functional elements of the tool with lubricant, such as oil, an oil emulsion, or a mist made up of air and oil. The system 10 may also be used to control cryogenic machining tools 12 comprising at least one internal pipe 11 in which a coolant circulates, for example a nitrogen-based coolant.

[0019] The system 10 is preferably used outside of machining operations done by the tool 12, i.e., the tool 12 is first disassembled from the device to which it belongs in order to be mounted on the system 10 for controlling the internal pipe(s) 11. In other words, the system 10 belongs to a station connected to the production. However, alternatively, the system 10 could be integrated into the machining apparatus comprising the tool 12.

[0020] To that end, the system 10 includes a pneumatic system 13 connected upstream from the internal pipe 11 of the tool 12. A pressure source 16 is connected to the pneumatic system 13 via a solenoid valve 17. A pressure switch 20 makes it possible to provide the value of the fluid pressure prevailing inside the pneumatic system 13.

[0021] Furthermore, the system 10 comprises an electrical control part 21 having a control unit 22 in communication with a control interface 25 suitable for controlling the solenoid valve 17, as well as a module 26 receiving data from the pressure switch 20. The electrical part 21 may also include an electronic chip reader 29, for example of the RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) type for automatic identification of the tool 12 whose pipe 11 must be controlled. The control unit 22 includes means, such as a microcontroller 30, to process and analyze the collected pressure data, as well as a man-machine interface 31 for example made up of a monitor and keyboard or a touch-sensitive screen to allow the operator to interact with the system 10.

[0022] Below, we will provide a more precise description, in reference to FIG. 2a, of the operation of the system 10 for detecting the total or partial obstruction of the pipe 11 of the tool 12.

[0023] Between time t0 and t1, the control unit 22 controls, via the interface 25, the opening of the solenoid valve 17 so as to pressurize the pneumatic system 13. Between time t1 and t2, the pressure in the system 13 stabilizes at a pressure substantially equal to the pressure Ps of the source 16.

[0024] Beginning at time t2, the control unit 22 controls, via the interface 25, the closing of the solenoid valve 17 so as to allow the system 13 to empty itself freely via the pipe 11 to be controlled.

[0025] The control unit 22 then detects the obstruction state of the pipe 11 based on the time taken by the system 13 to return to the ambient pressure Pa after closing of the solenoid valve 17.

[0026] Thus, the return to ambient pressure Pa of the pneumatic system 13 is fast (cf. duration T1) in the case of an unobstructed pipe 11, as illustrated by curve C1. The return to ambient pressure Pa is longer (cf. duration T2) in the case of a partially obstructed pipe 11, since the pressure loss slows the flow, as illustrated by curve C2. The system 13 remains pressurized in the case of a completely obstructed pipe 11 due to the absence of flow, as illustrated by curve C3. The duration T3 is therefore infinite due to the absence of flow. In this case, the control unit 22 detects the total obstruction of the internal pipe 11 when it is detected that the ambient pressure Pa has not been reached after a reference duration able to be calibrated based on the application, and in particular the dimensions of the pipe 11 to be controlled.

[0027] In the alternative embodiment of FIG. 2b, after stabilization of the pressure in the pneumatic system 13, the control unit 22 measures a pressure difference P between the pressure at the time of closing of the solenoid valve 17 and the pressure after a duration Tsec, for example several seconds, beginning from closing of the solenoid valve 17. Thus, one observes that this pressure difference is significant (cf. difference P1) in the case of an unobstructed pipe 11, as illustrated by curve C1. This pressure difference is smaller (cf. difference P2) in the case of a partially obstructed pipe 11, since the pressure loss slows the flow, as illustrated by curve C2. In the case of a completely obstructed pipe 11, the pressure difference is zero (cf. difference P3) due to the absence of flow, as illustrated by curve C3.

[0028] In the alternative embodiment of FIG. 2c, after the stabilization of the pressure in the pneumatic system 13, the control unit 22 measures the duration necessary for the pneumatic system 13 to reach a fixed target pressure Pc after closing of the solenoid valve 17. This target pressure Pc is greater than the pressure Pa and less than the pressure Ps of the pressure source 16. The advantage of this embodiment is that it is faster to implement than the embodiment of FIG. 2a.

[0029] Thus, one can see that the duration to reach the target pressure Pc is short (cf. duration T1) in the case of an unobstructed pipe 11, as illustrated by curve C1. This duration is greater (cf. duration T2) in the case of a partially obstructed pipe 11, since the pressure loss slows the flow, as illustrated by curve C2. It will be noted that the durations T1 and T2 are respectively shorter than the durations T1 and T2 obtained for identical curves C1 and C2. In the case of a completely obstructed pipe 11, the duration will be infinite (cf. duration T3) due to the absence of flow, as illustrated by curve C3. In this case, the control unit 22 detects the total obstruction of the internal pipe 11 when it is detected that the target pressure Pc has not been reached after a reference duration able to be calibrated based on the application, and in particular dimensions of the pipe 11 to be controlled.

[0030] In the alternative embodiment of FIG. 2d, after the stabilization of the pressure in the pneumatic system 13, the control unit 22 determines the drift slope P/dt(Ci) of the pressure change curve Ci in the pneumatic system 13 as a function of time after closing of the solenoid valve 17. Thus, one can see that the slope is steep (cf. slope P/dt(C1)) in the case of an unobstructed pipe 11, as illustrated by curve C1. The slope is gentler (cf. slope P/dt(C2)) in the case of a partially obstructed pipe 11, since the pressure loss slows the flow, as illustrated by curve C2. In the case of a completely obstructed pipe 11, the slope is zero (cf. slope P/dt(C3)) due to the absence of flow, as illustrated by curve C3.

[0031] In all of the considered cases, the invention is based on the analysis of the change over time of the pressure in the pneumatic system 13, which is proportional to the pressure loss (blockage) to be detected. The invention thus makes it possible to guarantee the compliance of the internal pipes 11 of the tool 12. This is even more important for micro-lubrication or oil micro-pulverizing or MQL (Minimum Quantity Lubrication) tools, for which the absence of obstruction of the pipes 11 conveying the lubricant is a condition for efficient operation of the tool 12.