ULTRASMALL AMORPHOUS METAL OXIDE NANOPARTICLES CATALYZE POLYOLEFIN HYDROGENOLYSIS

20250011477 ยท 2025-01-09

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    The present application is directed to a catalyst comprising a layer of metal oxide nanoparticles; and a mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounding the layer of metal oxide nanoparticles, wherein the mesoporous silica-containing shell has an outer surface and an inner surface inside the outer surface, the outer surface having openings leading to pores extending through said mesoporous silica-containing shell to the inner surface, wherein the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, molybdenum oxide, scandium oxide, yttrium oxide, and lanthanum oxide. The present application is also directed to a method of making such catalyst and a method for catalytically hydrogenolyzing a polymer with the catalyst into solvent, naphtha, diesel, kerosine, base oil, or wax-like products.

    Claims

    1. A catalyst comprising: a layer of metal oxide nanoparticles; and a mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounding the layer of metal oxide nanoparticles, wherein the mesoporous silica-containing shell has an outer surface and an inner surface inside the outer surface, the outer surface having openings leading to pores extending through said mesoporous silica-containing shell to the inner surface, wherein the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, molybdenum oxide, scandium oxide, yttrium oxide, and lanthanum oxide.

    2. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, and molybdenum oxide.

    3. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticles are zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    4. The catalyst of claim 3, wherein the zirconia oxide nanoparticles are amorphous zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    5. The catalyst of claim 3, wherein the zirconia oxide nanoparticles are crystalline zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    6. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 0.5 nm to about 5 nm.

    7. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 5 nm to about 10 nm.

    8. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 10 nm to about 500 nm.

    9. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 10 nm to about 1000 nm.

    10. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 10 nm to about 500 nm.

    11. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the mesoporous silica-containing shell has a pore diameter of about 1 nm to about 10 nm.

    12. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the pores have a length of about the thickness of the mesoporous silica shell measured between its inner and outer surfaces.

    13. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein said metal oxide nanoparticles comprise about 0.0001 wt % to about 20.0 wt % of said catalyst.

    14. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein said metal oxide nanoparticles comprise about 1 wt % to about 20.0 wt % of said catalyst.

    15. A process for catalytically hydrogenolyzing a polymer, said process comprising: providing a polymer; and subjecting said polymer to a hydrogenolysis reaction in the presence of a catalyst to cleave the polymer into hydrocarbon segments, wherein the catalyst comprises metal oxide, wherein the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, titanium oxide, hafnium oxide, lanthanum oxide, cerium oxide, niobium oxide, molybdenum oxide, tungsten oxide, tantalum oxide, scandium oxide, and yttrium oxide.

    16.-24. (canceled)

    25. The process of claim 15, wherein the catalyst comprises: a plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles; and a mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounding the plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles, wherein the mesoporous silica-containing shell has an outer surface and an inner surface inside the outer surface, the outer surface having openings leading to pores extending through said mesoporous silica-containing shell to the inner surface, wherein the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, molybdenum oxide, scandium oxide, yttrium oxide, and lanthanum oxide.

    26.-46. (canceled)

    47. A method of preparing a catalyst comprising: providing a graphene oxide; providing a metal containing compound; adding the metal containing compound to the graphene oxide to form a plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on the graphene oxide; contacting the plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on the graphene oxide with a silicon containing compound and a pore structure-directing agent to produce a mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounding the plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on the graphene oxide, wherein the mesoporous silica-containing shell has an outer surface and an inner surface inside the outer surface, the outer surface having openings leading to pores extending through said mesoporous silica-containing shell to the inner surface; and calcinating the mesoporous silica-containing shell containing the plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on graphene oxide to produce a mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounding the plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles, wherein the mesoporous silica-containing shell has an outer surface and an inner surface inside the outer surface, the outer surface having openings leading to pores extending through said mesoporous silica-containing shell to the inner surface; wherein the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, molybdenum oxide, scandium oxide, yttrium oxide, and lanthanum oxide.

    48.-66. (canceled)

    Description

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

    [0014] FIGS. 1A-F show powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern (FIG. 1A), high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF STEM) images (FIGS. 1B-C), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) elemental maps (Figures ID-F) of imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 sample. PXRD pattern shows a featureless broad hump, indicating imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 is an amorphous material. The STEM image and the EDX elemental maps display an even distribution of ZrO.sub.2 onto the layered mSiO.sub.2 support.

    [0015] FIGS. 2A-C show characterization data for ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2. FIG. 2A shows PXRD pattern of ZrO.sub.2-6 obtained from a hydrothermal synthesis, together with the simulated patterns of crystalline ZrO.sub.2 with tetragonal and monoclinic phases. The pattern shows that ZrO.sub.2-6 is monoclinic with an average size of 6.4 nm, estimated by the Scherrer equation: L=0.94/(cos .Math.B), where L is mean particle size, B is the peak width at half the maximum intensity (FWHM), after subtracting the instrumental line broadening (an empirical value 0.1 in 2 is used). The full widths at half maximum (FWHM) of the (111) peak (1.388) and the (111) peak (1.400) were used for the mean size estimation. FIG. 2B is a low-magnification STEM image showing that ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles are nano-agglomerates with the primary size less than 6 nm and FIG. 2C is a high-magnification STEM image showing lattice fringes at nanoparticles, indicative of the crystalline characteristics of nanoparticles.

    [0016] FIGS. 3A-B show N.sub.2 sorption isotherms (FIG. 3A) and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore size distributions (FIG. 3B) of the mSiO.sub.2, L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2, imp-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2, ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2, and L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2.

    [0017] FIG. 4 is a schematic showing the construction of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2. Step 1 is precipitation-deposition of ZrO.sub.2(OH).sub.4-2x nanoparticles onto graphene oxide (GO). Step 2a is coating mSiO.sub.2 onto ZrO.sub.2(OH).sub.4-2x/GO. Step 2b is calcination at 550 C.

    [0018] FIGS. 5A-F show electron microscopy for ZrO.sub.2 catalyst characterization. FIGS. 5A-B show low-magnification (FIG. 5A) (inset: SAED pattern) and high-magnification (FIG. 5B) HAADF STEM images of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2. FIGS. 5C-D show low-magnification (FIG. 5C) and high-resolution (FIG. 5D) HAADF STEM image of the cross-section of a L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 particle prepared by microtome. FIGS. 5E-F show high-magnification HAADF STEM image (FIG. 5E) and the corresponding EDX elemental (Si and Zr; Si; O; Zr) maps (FIG. 5F) of the cross-section of a L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 particle.

    [0019] FIGS. 6A-C show low-magnification (FIG. 6A) and high-magnification (FIG. 6B) TEM images of the ZrO.sub.x(OH).sub.4-2x/GO and size distribution of ZrO.sub.x(OH)+.sub.2x nanoparticles on GO with average size of 3.00.4 nm (FIG. 6C).

    [0020] FIG. 7 shows the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectrum (1100-0 eV) of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 and the peak assignments. As shown in the spectrum, within the XPS detection limit (0.1 at. %), only O, C, Si, and Zr were detected with the loading of 72.82 at. %, 2.46 at. %, 24.24 at. %, and 0.48 at. %, respectively.

    [0021] FIGS. 8A-B show scanning transmission electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray (STEM-EDX) spectrum (0.5-20.0 KeV) (FIG. 8A) and enlarged spectrum (0.5-5.0 KeV) of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 (FIG. 8B). Apart from the C, O, Si, Zr, and Cu species, other metal impurities were not detected. The detected C and Cu signals could be only contributed to the Cu grid with coated carbon thin film that is used for transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

    [0022] FIGS. 9A-D are TEM images of GO@mSiO.sub.2 nanoplatelets before (FIGS. 9A-B) and after (FIGS. 9C-D) removal of GO and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) by calcination at 550 C. for 6 hours. FIGS. 9E-F show low-magnification (FIG. 9E) and high-magnification (FIG. 9F) STEM images of cross-sectioned mSiO.sub.2 nanoplatelets embedded in epoxy resin. Low-magnification TEM image (FIG. 9A) shows a good dispersity of GO@mSiO.sub.2 nanoplatelets. High-magnification TEM image (FIG. 9B) shows the silica shell is mesoporous. FIG. 9C displays that mSiO.sub.2 retained the mesoporous structure after calcination. A narrow (3.5 nm) bright/dark band is observed in FIGS. 9D-F, suggesting a narrow open cavity between two mSiO.sub.2 layers.

    [0023] FIGS. 10A-B show a HAADF image and the corresponding EDX elemental maps (left-right: Si and Zr mix, Si, Zr) of ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 (FIG. 10A) and a cross-sectioned ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 particle (FIG. 10B). The top-down and cross-section view STEM images show that brighter contrast only exists on the external surface of mSiO.sub.2 platelets. The corresponding elemental maps display that Zr is solely distributed on the external surfaces. Taken together, ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles are confirmed distributed on the external surfaces on mSiO.sub.2 particles or as separate aggregates not on mSiO.sub.2.

    [0024] FIGS. 11A-B show low-magnification (FIG. 11A) and high-magnification (FIG. 11B) HAADF STEM images of commercial Pt/C catalyst from Alfa Aesar. FIG. 11C is a bar graph showing size distribution of Pt nanoparticles of Pt/C catalyst with the average size of 1.30.4 nm.

    [0025] FIGS. 12A-B show HAADF STEM images of L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2 catalyst from top-down view (FIG. 12A) and side view (FIG. 12B). FIG. 12C is a bar graph showing size distribution of Pt nanoparticles of L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2 catalyst with the average size of 3.50.8 nm.

    [0026] FIGS. 13A-B show low-magnification (FIG. 13A) and high-magnification (FIG. 13B) TEM images of the PtO.sub.x(OH).sub.4-2x/GO composite. FIG. 13C is a bar graph showing size distribution of PtO.sub.x(OH).sub.4-2x nanoparticles on GO.

    [0027] FIGS. 14A-B show TEM image of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 with the electron beam focused on ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles (FIG. 14A) and size distribution of ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles on L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 with the average size of 3.00.5 nm (FIG. 14B).

    [0028] FIG. 15 shows PXRD pattern of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 sample, together with the simulated patterns of crystalline ZrO.sub.2 with tetragonal and monoclinic phases. The broad hump in the pattern of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 indicates the amorphous characteristics of the sample.

    [0029] FIG. 16A shows PXRD pattern of the sample of ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles obtained from the calcination of ZrO.sub.x(OH).sub.4-2x/GO composite at 550 C. for 6 hours, together with the simulated patterns of crystalline ZrO.sub.2 with tetragonal and monoclinic phases. The pattern shows the ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles contain both tetragonal and monoclinic nanocrystallites with a size of 5.5 nm and 9.3 nm, respectively, estimated by the Scherrer equation: L=0.94/(cos .Math.B), where L is mean particle size, B is the peak broadening defined by FWHM, after subtracting the instrumental line broadening (an empirical value 0.1 in 20 is used). The FWHM of the (101) peak (1.605) for the tetragonal phase and the (101) peak (0.984) for the monoclinic phase are used for the mean size estimation. FIGS. 16B-C is a low-magnification HAADF STEM image displaying that ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles are nano-agglomerates with the primary size less than 10 nm (FIG. 16B) and high-magnification STEM image (FIG. 16C) showing that lattice fringes at nanoparticles, indicating the crystalline characteristics of nanoparticles.

    [0030] FIG. 17 shows gel permeation chromatography (GPC) analysis of molecular mass and distribution of the commercial PE starting material; M.sub.n=20 kDa, M.sub.w=90 kDa (Alfa Aesar 42607).

    [0031] FIG. 18 shows TGA-DSC analysis of PE starting material (M.sub.n=20 kDa, M.sub.w=90 kDa) showing its thermal stability from 50 to 500 C.

    [0032] FIGS. 19A-H show hydrogenolysis results from L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 and control catalysts. FIG. 19A shows time-dependent conversion of polyethylene (PE) (M.sub.n=20 kDa, M.sub.w=90 kDa, =4.8), liquid yield, and volatile yield in mass percentage catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 under H.sub.2 at 300 C. Data are presented as H.sub.2 quantification (mean1) determined from 3 or more gas chromatography (GC) measurements. FIG. 19B shows carbon number distribution of liquid products from hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 after 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 20 hours.

    [0033] FIG. 19C shows comparison of CC bond cleavage activity (left axis, mean1 determined from three H.sub.2 quantification measurements and mass of metal loading) and conversion of PE (right axis, mean1 determined from two experiments of isolated material) at 300 C. for 6 hours. FIG. 19D shows comparison of CC bond cleavage reactivity for short and long, linear and branched polymers in L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2-catalyzed hydrogenolysis. FIGS. 19E-H show carbon number distribution of liquid products catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 (FIG. 19E), ZrO.sub.2-30 (FIG. 19F), imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 (FIG. 19G), and ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 (FIG. 19H), obtained from reactions that consumed similar mols of H.sub.2.

    [0034] FIG. 20 is a graph showing experimental M.sub.n of the lumped phases fitted to eq 3.

    [0035] FIG. 21 shows gas chromatography-flame ionized detector (GC-FID) trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2, yielding 2.2 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 3). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 2 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0036] FIG. 22 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined from GC-FID analysis (FIG. 21) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 2 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0037] FIG. 23 shows gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 2 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 15.5% of the mass of the starting PE (Table 3).

    [0038] FIG. 24 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined from GC-MS analysis of the oil products (FIG. 23) generated in the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 2 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0039] FIG. 25 shows GPC trace of the solid remaining after the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 and extraction of oil products with methylene chloride, corresponding to 82.3 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 3). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 2 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=3,050 Da, M.sub.w=6,900 Da, =2.3 (Table 6).

    [0040] FIG. 26 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2, yielding 3.0 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 3). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 4 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0041] FIG. 27 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined from GC-FID analysis of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 (FIG. 25). Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 4 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0042] FIG. 28 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 4 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 27.8% of the mass of the starting PE (Table 3).

    [0043] FIG. 29 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined from GC-MS analysis (FIG. 28) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 4 hours, 300 C., H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0044] FIG. 30 shows GPC trace of the solid left over after the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 after 4 hours and extraction of oil products with methylene chloride, corresponding to 69.2 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 3). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 4 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=1,990 Da, M.sub.w=3,800 Da, =1.9 (Table 7).

    [0045] FIG. 31 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 for 6 hours, yielding 2.7 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 3). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0046] FIG. 32 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined from GC-FID analysis of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 (FIG. 30). Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0047] FIG. 33 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 (Table 3). Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 42.3% of the mass of the starting PE.

    [0048] FIG. 34 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined from GC-MS analysis (FIG. 33) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 w/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0049] FIG. 35 shows GPC trace of the solid remaining after hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 and extraction of oil products with methylene chloride, corresponding to 55.4 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=1,880 Da, M.sub.w=3,300 Da, =1.8 (Table 7).

    [0050] FIG. 36 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 (Table 3), yielding 6.5 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 8 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0051] FIG. 37 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined from GC-FID analysis (FIG. 36) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 8 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0052] FIG. 38 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 (Table 3). Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 8 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 55.0% of the mas of the starting PE.

    [0053] FIG. 39 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS FIG. 38) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 after 8 hours. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 8 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0054] FIG. 40 shows GPC trace of the solid remaining after the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 and extraction of oil products with methylene chloride, corresponding to 38.5 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 8 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=1,600 Da, M.sub.w=2,700 Da, =1.7 (Table 7).

    [0055] FIG. 41 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2, yielding 7.7 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 3). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 12 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0056] FIG. 42 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 41) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 12 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0057] FIG. 43 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 12 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 64.9% of the mass of the starting PE (Table 3).

    [0058] FIG. 44 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 43) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 12 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0059] FIG. 45 shows GPC trace of the solid remaining after the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 and extraction of soluble oils using methylene chloride, corresponding to 27.4 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 12 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=930 Da, M.sub.w=1,800 Da, =1.9

    (Table 7).

    [0060] FIG. 46 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 over 15 hours (Table 3). Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 15 hours, 300 C., H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 79.8% of the mass of the starting PE.

    [0061] FIG. 47 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 46) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 15 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0062] FIG. 48 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2, yielding 9.8 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 3). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 15 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0063] FIG. 49 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 48) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 15 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0064] FIG. 50 shows GPC trace of the solid remaining after the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 and extraction of the soluble oil with methylene chloride, yielding 82.3 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 15 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=1,100 Da, M.sub.w=1,990 Da, =1.8 (Table 7).

    [0065] FIG. 51 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2, yielding 14.2 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 3). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 20 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0066] FIG. 52 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 51) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 20 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0067] FIG. 53 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 (Table 3). Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 20 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 85.8% of the mass of the starting PE.

    [0068] FIG. 54 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 53) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 20 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0069] FIG. 55 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2, yielding 2.6% volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 6). Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0070] FIG. 56 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 55) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 (Table 6). Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0071] FIG. 57 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by imp-ZrO.sub.2/SiO.sub.2 (Table 6). Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 20.1% of the mass of the starting PE.

    [0072] FIG. 58 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 57) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0073] FIG. 59 shows GPC trace of the solid remaining after hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 and extraction of oils using methylene chloride, yielding 77.4 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=3,000 Da, M.sub.w=8,700 Da, =2.9 (Table 7).

    [0074] FIG. 60 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2, yielding 0.7% volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 6). Conditions: 0.0119 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0075] FIG. 61 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 60) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0119 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0076] FIG. 62 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0119 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 12.6% of the mass of the starting PE (Table 6).

    [0077] FIG. 63 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 62) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0119 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0078] FIG. 64 shows GPC trace of the solid left over from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2, yielding 86.7 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Reaction conditions: 0.0119 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=4,500 Da, M.sub.w=29,600 Da, =6.6 (Table 7).

    [0079] FIG. 65 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2, yielding 13.7% volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 6). Conditions: 0.0119 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 15 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0080] FIG. 66 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 65) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0119 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 15 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0081] FIG. 67 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 (Table 6). Conditions: 0.0119 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 15 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 25.1% of the mass of the starting PE.

    [0082] FIG. 68 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined from GC-MS analysis (FIG. 67) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0119 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 15 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0083] FIG. 69 shows GPC trace of the solid remaining after the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 and extraction of soluble oils with methylene chloride, yielding 61.0 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Reaction conditions: 0.0119 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 15 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=1,700 Da, M.sub.w=5,800 Da, =3.4 (Table 7).

    [0084] FIG. 70 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace for the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-30, yielding 0.7% volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 6). Conditions: 0.183 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, at 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0085] FIG. 71 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 70) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-30. Conditions: 0.183 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0086] FIG. 72 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-30. Conditions: 0.183 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 12.6% of the mass of the starting PE.

    [0087] FIG. 73 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 72) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-30. Conditions: 0.183 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0088] FIG. 74 shows GPC trace of the solid remaining after the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-30 and extraction of the soluble oils using methylene chloride, yielding 86.7 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Reaction conditions: 0.183 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt 9%, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=3,000 Da, M.sub.w=6,000 Da, =2.0 (Table 7).

    [0089] FIG. 75 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-30, yielding 3.3% volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 6). Conditions: 0.183 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 12 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0090] FIG. 76 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined from GC-FID analysis (FIG. 75) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-30. Conditions: 0.183 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 12 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0091] FIG. 77 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-30 (Table 6). Conditions: 0.183 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 12 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 27.7% of the mass of the starting PE.

    [0092] FIG. 78 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 77) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by ZrO.sub.2-30. Conditions: 0.183 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 12 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0093] FIG. 79 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2, yielding 2.6% volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 6). Conditions: 0.0092 Pt wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0094] FIG. 80 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 79) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0092 Pt wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C. under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0095] FIG. 81 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0092 Pt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 51.5% of the mass of the starting PE (Table 6).

    [0096] FIG. 82 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 81) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0092 Pt wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0097] FIG. 83 shows GPC trace of the solid remaining after hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2 and extraction of soluble oils using methylene chloride, yielding 45.9 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Reaction conditions: 0.0092 Pt wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=2,400 Da, M.sub.w=3,800 Da, =1.6 (Table 7).

    [0098] FIG. 84 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by Pt/C, yielding 2.2% volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 6). Conditions: 0.0092 Pt wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0099] FIG. 85 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 84) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by Pt/C. Conditions: 0.0092 Pt wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0100] FIG. 86 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by Pt/C. Conditions: 0.0092 Pt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 22.2% of the mass of the starting PE (Table 6).

    [0101] FIG. 87 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 86) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by Pt/C. Conditions: 0.0092 Pt wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0102] FIG. 88 shows GPC trace of the solid remaining after hydrogenolysis of PE catalyzed by Pt/C and extraction of soluble oils with methylene chloride, yielding 75.6 wt % solid residue with respect to the mass of the starting PE. Reaction conditions: 0.0092 Pt wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). M.sub.n=1,400 Da, M.sub.w=1,900 Da, =1.4 (Table 7).

    [0103] FIG. 89 shows GPC analysis of molecular mass and distributions of a post-consumer grocery bag; M.sub.n=10.6 kDa, M.sub.w=150.0 kDa.

    [0104] FIG. 90 shows GPC analysis of molecular mass and distributions of a commercial PE starting material; M.sub.n=2.8 kDa, M.sub.w=5.4 kDa (Aldrich 332119).

    [0105] FIG. 91 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of hexatriacontane (C.sub.36H.sub.74) catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2, yielding 1.7 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the hexatriacontane (Table 8). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/C.sub.36H.sub.74 wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0106] FIG. 92 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 91) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of hexatriacontane catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/C.sub.36H.sub.74 wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0107] FIG. 93 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of hexatriacontane catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/C.sub.36H.sub.74 wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: Solid/liquid mixture was scraped from the reaction vessel. 34% of the starting hexatriacontane was converted.

    [0108] FIG. 94 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined from GC-MS analysis (FIG. 93) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of hexatriacontane catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/C.sub.36H.sub.74 wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0109] FIG. 95 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of LDPE (M.sub.n=2.8 kDa, M.sub.w=5.3 kDa) catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2, yielding 4.5 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 8). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0110] FIG. 96 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 95) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of LDPE (M.sub.n=2.8 kDa, M.sub.w=5.3 kDa) catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0111] FIG. 97 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of LDPE (M.sub.n=2.8 kDa, M.sub.w=5.3 kDa) catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 47.4% of the mass of the starting PE.

    [0112] FIG. 98 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of LDPE (M.sub.n=2.8 kDa, M.sub.w=5.3 kDa) catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0113] FIG. 99 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of a post-consumer grocery bag catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2, yielding 1.7 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 8). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0114] FIG. 100 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 99) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of a post-consumer grocery bag catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0115] FIG. 101 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of post-consumer grocery bag catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 w/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 41.1% of the mass of the starting PE (Table 8).

    [0116] FIG. 102 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 101) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of post-consumer grocery bag catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0117] FIG. 103 shows GC-FID trace of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2, yielding 2.9 wt % volatile species with respect to the mass of the starting PE (Table 8). Reaction conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0118] FIG. 104 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-FID analysis (FIG. 103) of the sampled headspace from the hydrogenolysis of UHMWPE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    [0119] FIG. 105 shows GC-MS trace of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of UHMWPE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa). Workup: extraction of the solid reaction mixture with methylene chloride at 80 C. Oil yield corresponds to 46.6% of the mass of the starting PE (Table 8).

    [0120] FIG. 106 is a bar graph showing carbon number distribution determined by GC-MS analysis (FIG. 105) of the oil products from the hydrogenolysis of UHMWPE catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2. Conditions: 0.0086 ZrO.sub.2 wt/PE wt %, 6 hours, 300 C., under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa).

    DETAILED DESCRIPTION

    [0121] One aspect of the present disclosure relates to a catalyst comprising a layer of metal oxide nanoparticles and a mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounding the layer of metal oxide nanoparticles. The mesoporous silica-containing shell has an outer surface and an inner surface inside the outer surface, the outer surface having openings leading to pores extending through the mesoporous silica-containing shell to the inner surface. The metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, molybdenum oxide, scandium oxide, yttrium oxide, and lanthanum oxide.

    [0122] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles form a uniform layer. In other embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles are not uniformly distributed.

    [0123] According to the present disclosure, the layer of metal oxide as separated or fused nanoparticles can have a thickness of about 0.1 nm to about 10000 nm, about 1 nm to about 5000 nm, about 1 nm to about 1000 nm, about 5 nm to about 1000 nm, about 10 nm to about 1000 nm, about 15 nm to about 1000 nm, about 20 nm to about 1000 nm, about 10 nm to about 900 nm, about 10 nm to about 800 nm, about 10 nm to about 700 nm, about 10 nm to about 600 nm, about 10 nm to about 500 nm, about 10 nm to about 400 nm, about 10 nm to about 300 nm, about 10 nm to about 200 nm, about 10 nm to about 100 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 500 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 250 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 100 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 50 nm, about 1 nm to about 500 nm, about 1 nm to about 50 nm, about 2 nm to about 40 nm, about 3 nm to about 30 nm, about 4 nm to about 20 nm, about 5 nm to about 10 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 10 nm, about 0.2 nm to about 9 nm, about 0.3 nm to about 8 nm, about 0.4 nm to about 7 nm, about 0.4 nm to about 6 nm, about 0.5 nm to about 5 nm, about 0.6 nm to about 5 nm, about 0.7 nm to about 4 nm, or about 0.8 nm to about 3 nm. The layer of metal oxide nanoparticles can have a thickness of about 0.1 nm, about 0.25 nm, about 0.5 nm, about 0.75 nm, about 1 nm, about 1.25 nm, about 1.5 nm, about 1.75 nm, about 2 nm, about 2.25 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 2.75 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.25 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 3.75 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, about 5 nm, about 5.5 nm, about 6 nm, about 6.5 nm, about 7 nm, about 7.5 nm, about 8 nm, about 8.5 nm, about 9 nm, about 9.5 nm, or about 10 nm. In some embodiments, the layer of metal oxide nanoparticles can have a thickness of about 0.5 nm, about 1 nm, about 1.5 nm, about 2 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, or about 5 nm.

    [0124] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles are selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, and molybdenum oxide. In one embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    [0125] In some embodiments, the zirconia oxide nanoparticles are amorphous zirconia oxide nanoparticles. Alternatively, the zirconia oxide nanoparticles are crystalline zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    [0126] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles are embedded in the inner surface of the shell via contacts between the surface of the metal oxide nanoparticles and inner surface of the shell.

    [0127] According to the present disclosure, the metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 0.1 nm to about 1000 nm, about 1 nm to about 1000 nm, about 5 nm to about 1000 nm, about 10 nm to about 1000 nm, about 15 nm to about 1000 nm, about 20 nm to about 1000 nm, about 10 nm to about 900 nm, about 10 nm to about 800 nm, about 10 nm to about 700 nm, about 10 nm to about 600 nm, about 10 nm to about 500 nm, about 10 nm to about 400 nm, about 10 nm to about 300 nm, about 10 nm to about 200 nm, about 10 nm to about 100 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 500 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 250 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 100 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 50 nm, about 1 nm to about 500 nm, about 1 nm to about 50 nm, about 2 nm to about 40 nm, about 3 nm to about 30 nm, about 4 nm to about 20 nm, about 5 nm to about 10 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 10 nm, about 0.2 nm to about 9 nm, about 0.3 nm to about 8 nm, about 0.4 nm to about 7 nm, about 0.4 nm to about 6 nm, about 0.5 nm to about 5 nm, about 0.6 nm to about 5 nm, about 0.7 nm to about 4 nm, or about 0.8 nm to about 3 nm. The metal oxide nanoparticles can have a mean particle diameter of about 0.1 nm, about 0.25 nm, about 0.5 nm, about 0.75 nm, about 1 nm, about 1.25 nm, about 1.5 nm, about 1.75 nm, about 2 nm, about 2.25 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 2.75 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.25 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 3.75 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, about 5 nm, about 5.5 nm, about 6 nm, about 6.5 nm, about 7 nm, about 7.5 nm, about 8 nm, about 8.5 nm, about 9 nm, about 9.5 nm, or about 10 nm. In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 0.5 nm, about 1 nm, about 1.5 nm, about 2 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, or about 5 nm.

    [0128] According to the present disclosure, the mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounds the layer of metal oxide nanoparticles. The metal oxide nanoparticles can be surrounded by one or more layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell (e.g., one layer, two layers, three layers, etc.). In one embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by one layer of mesoporous silica-containing shell. In another embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by two layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell. In another embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by three layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell.

    [0129] According to the present disclosure, the layer of the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 10 nm to about 2000 nm. The thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell is a distance between the outer surfaces of the mesoporous silica-containing shell.

    [0130] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by one layer of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the mesoporous silica-containing shell can have a total thickness of about 10 nm to about 500 nm, about 20 nm to about 400 nm, about 30 nm to about 300 nm, about 40 nm to about 200 nm, about 50 nm to about 100 nm, about 60 nm to about 90 nm, about 40 nm to about 60 nm, or about 20 to about 40 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 10 nm, about 20 nm, about 30 nm, about 40 nm, about 50 nm, about 60 nm, about 70 nm, about 80 nm, about 90 nm, about 100 nm, about 110 nm, about 120 nm, about 130 nm, about 140 nm, or about 150 nm. In one embodiment, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 70 nm.

    [0131] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by two layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the total thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell can be about 20 nm to about 1000 nm, about 40 nm to about 800 nm, about 60 nm to about 600 nm, about 80 nm to about 400 nm, about 100 nm to about 200 nm, about 120 nm to about 180 nm, about 40 nm to 60 nm, or 20 to 40 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 20 nm, about 40 nm, about 50 nm, about 60 nm, about 70 nm, about 80 nm, about 90 nm, about 100 nm, about 110 nm, about 120 nm, about 130 nm, about 140 nm, about 150 nm, about 160 nm, about 170 nm, about 180 nm, about 190 nm, about 200 nm, about 220 nm, about 240 nm, about 260 nm, about 280 nm, or about 300 nm.

    [0132] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by three layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the total thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell can be about 30 nm to about 1500 nm, about 60 nm to about 1200 nm, about 90 nm to about 900 nm, about 120 nm to about 600 nm, about 150 nm to about 300 nm, or about 180 nm to about 270 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 40 nm, about 60 nm, about 80 nm, about 100 nm, about 120 nm, about 140 nm, about 160 nm, about 180 nm, about 200 nm, about 220 nm, about 240 nm, about 260 nm, about 280 nm, about 300 nm, about 400 nm, or about 500 nm.

    [0133] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by four or more layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the total thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell can be about 50 nm to about 2000 nm, about 75 nm to about 1750 nm, about 100 nm to about 1500 nm, about 125 nm to about 1250 nm, about 150 nm to about 1000 nm, about 175 nm to about 750 nm, or about 200 nm to about 500 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 50 nm, about 75 nm, about 100 nm, about 125 nm, about 150 nm, about 175 nm, about 200 nm, about 225 nm, about 250 nm, about 275 nm, about 300 nm, about 350 nm, about 400 nm, about 500 nm, about 600 nm, about 700 nm, about 800 nm, about 900 nm, about 1000 nm, or about 1500 nm.

    [0134] According to the present disclosure, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has pores that extend through the shell (from the openings in the outer surface to the inner surface). According to the present disclosure, these pores can have a diameter from about 1 nm to about 10 nm, about 1.5 nm to about 9 nm, about 2 nm to about 8 nm, about 2.5 nm to about 7 nm, about 3 nm to about 6 nm, about 3 nm to about 5 nm, about 3 nm to about 4 nm, or about 2 nm to about 3 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has a pore diameter of about 2 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, or about 5 nm. In one embodiment, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has a pore diameter of about 3.5 nm.

    [0135] The pores present in the mesoporous silica-containing shell have a length. The length of the pores is a distance between the inner surface and the outer surface of the mesoporous silica-containing shell. According to the present disclosure, the length of the pores in the mesoporous silica-containing shell depends on the number of layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounding the metal oxide nanoparticles (e.g., one layer, two layers, three layers, etc.).

    [0136] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by one layer of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the length of the pores can be of about 5 nm to about 250 nm, about 10 nm to about 200 nm, about 15 nm to about 150 nm, about 20 nm to about 100 nm, about 25 nm to about 50 nm, or about 30 nm to about 45 nm. In some embodiments, the length of the pores in the mesoporous silica-containing shell is about 5 nm, about 10 nm, about 15 nm, about 20 nm, about 25 nm, about 30 nm, about 35 nm, about 40 nm, about 45 nm, about 50 nm, about 55 nm, about 60 nm, about 65 nm, about 70 nm, or about 75 nm. In one embodiment, the length of the pores in the mesoporous silica-containing shell is about 35 nm.

    [0137] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise about 0.0001 wt % to about 20.0 wt % of the catalyst. For example, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise about 0.0001 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 5.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 1.0 wt %, about 0.001 wt % to about 20.0 wt %, about 0.001 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.005 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.005 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.01 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.05 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.1 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.1 wt % to about 5.0 wt %, about 1 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 1 wt % to about 7.5 wt %, about 2.5 wt % to about 7.5 wt %, about 4 wt % to about 5.5 wt %, or about 4.5 wt % to about 5.5 wt % of the catalyst. In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles comprise about 3 wt %, about 3.5 wt %, about 4 wt %, about 4.5 wt %, about 5 wt %, about 5.5 wt %, about 6 wt %, about 6.5 wt % of the catalyst. In one embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles comprise about 4 wt %, about 4.5 wt %, about 5 wt %, or about 5.5 wt % of the catalyst.

    [0138] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise less than 0.0001 wt % of the catalyst. For example, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise less than 0.0001 wt %, less than 0.00005 wt %, or less than 0.00001 wt % of the catalyst.

    [0139] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise more than 20 wt % of the catalyst. For example, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise more than 25 wt %, more than 30 wt %, more than 35 wt %, more than 40 wt %, more than 45 wt %, more than 50 wt %, more than 55 wt %, more than 60 wt %, or more than 65 wt % of the catalyst.

    [0140] Another aspect of the present disclosure relates to a process for catalytically hydrogenolyzing a polymer. This process includes providing a polymer and hydrogen and subjecting the polymer to a hydrogenolysis reaction in the presence of a catalyst to cleave the polymer into hydrocarbon segments. The catalyst comprises metal oxide, where the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, titanium oxide, hafnium oxide, lanthanum oxide, cerium oxide, niobium oxide, molybdenum oxide, tungsten oxide, tantalum oxide, scandium oxide, and yttrium oxide.

    [0141] In some embodiments, the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, titanium oxide, hafnium oxide, lanthanum oxide, cerium oxide, niobium oxide, and molybdenum oxide. In one embodiment, the metal oxide is zirconium oxide.

    [0142] In some embodiments, the metal oxide is a plurality of the metal oxide nanoparticles.

    [0143] In some embodiments, the metal oxide comprises about 0.0001 wt % to about 20.0 wt % of the catalyst. For example, the metal oxide comprises about 0.0001 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 5.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 1.0 wt %, about 0.001 wt % to about 20.0 wt %, about 0.001 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.005 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.005 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.01 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.05 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.1 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.1 wt % to about 5.0 wt %, about 1 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 1 wt % to about 7.5 wt %, about 2.5 wt % to about 7.5 wt %, about 4 wt % to about 5.5 wt %, or about 4.5 wt % to about 5.5 wt % of the catalyst. In some embodiments, metal oxide comprises about 3 wt %, about 3.5 wt %, about 4 wt %, about 4.5 wt %, about 5 wt %, about 5.5 wt %, about 6 wt %, about 6.5 wt % of the catalyst. In one embodiment, metal oxide comprises about 4 wt %, about 4.5 wt %, about 5 wt %, or about 5.5 wt % of the catalyst.

    [0144] In some embodiments, the catalyst contains less than 0.0001 wt % of the metal oxide. For example, the catalyst can contain less than 0.0001 wt %, less than 0.00005 wt %, or less than 0.00001 wt % of the metal oxide.

    [0145] In some embodiments, the catalyst contains more than 20 wt % of the metal oxide. For example, the catalyst can contain more than 25 wt %, more than 30 wt %, more than 35 wt %, more than 40 wt %, more than 45 wt %, more than 50 wt %, more than 55 wt %, more than 60 wt %, or more than 65 wt % of the metal oxide.

    [0146] Suitable polymers that can be used according to the present disclosure include polyethylene, atactic polypropylene, isotactic polypropylene, highly isotactic polypropylene, syndiotactic polypropylene, polybutene, high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, polymethylmethacrylate, or any other polymers polymerizable by a high-pressure free radical process; polyvinylchloride, polybutene-1, isotactic polybutene, ABS resins, polybutadiene (PBD), vulcanized PBD, polystyrene, polyisoprene, ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR), vulcanized EPR, EPDM, and mixtures thereof.

    [0147] Suitable polymers that can be used according to the present disclosure also include random copolymer of propylene and ethylene, and/or butene, and/or hexene, and/or octene, and/or ethylene vinyl acetate, and/or ethylene methyl acrylate; and/or acrylic acid, and mixtures thereof.

    [0148] Suitable polymers that can be used according to the present disclosure also include block copolymer, styrenic block copolymers, cross linked polyethylene, copolymers of ethylene and vinyl alcohol (EVOH); polymers of aromatic monomers such as polystyrene, poly-1 esters, polyacetal, polyethylene glycols, and/or polyisobutylene, and mixtures thereof.

    [0149] In some embodiments, the polymer is selected from the group consisting of physical mixtures of polymers, polymeric blends, copolymers, block copolymers, graft copolymers, and combinations thereof.

    [0150] In some embodiments, the polymer is a polyolefinic polymer, such as high density polyethylene, isotactic polypropylene, medium density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber, and combinations thereof.

    [0151] In some embodiments, the polymer is in a form of a trash bags, fuel tanks, bottle caps, plastic bottles, liquid containers (e.g., bottles for milk, juice, water, and laundry products), tubing, plastic wrap, piping, carpet, roofing, hinges, auto parts, seals, or electrical insulation.

    [0152] High density polyethylene (HDPE) generally has a density of greater or equal to 0.941 g/cm.sup.3, or for example, from 0.941 to 0.97 g/cm.sup.3. HDPE has a low degree of branching. High density polyethylene is used to make bottles for milk, juice, water, and laundry products.

    [0153] Low density polyethylene (LDPE) is a polyethylene with a high degree of branching with long chains. Often, the density of a LDPE will range from 0.910-0.940 g/cm.sup.3.

    [0154] Linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) is a polyethylene with significant numbers of short branches resulting from copolymerization of ethylene with at least one C.sub.3-12 -olefin comonomer, e.g., butene, hexene or octene. Typically, LLDPE has a density in the range of 0.915-0.925 g/cm.sup.3. In some embodiments, the LLDPE is an ethylene hexene copolymer, or an ethylene octene copolymer, or an ethylene butene copolymer. The amount of comonomer incorporated can be from 0.5 to 12 mole %, or in some embodiments from 1.5 to 10 mole %, and in other embodiments from 2 to 8 mole % relative to ethylene.

    [0155] Medium density polyethylene (MDPE) is a polyethylene with some branching and a density in the range of 0.926-0.940 g/cm.sup.3.

    [0156] Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) is a thermoplastic. It has extremely long chains, with molecular weight numbering in the millions, usually between 2 and 6 million. The longer chain serves to transfer load more effectively to the polymer backbone by strengthening intermolecular interactions. This results in a very tough material, with the highest impact strength of any thermoplastic presently made.

    [0157] An isotactic polypropylene is one in which all of the pendant groups are located on the same side of the hydrocarbon backbone chain. Suitable polypropylene that can be used according to the present disclosure includes isotactic and highly isotactic polypropylene. As used herein, isotactic is defined as having at least 10% isotactic pentads, preferably having at least 40% isotactic pentads of methyl groups derived from propylene according to analysis by 13C-NMR. As used herein, highly isotactic is defined as having at least 60% isotactic pentads according to analysis by 13C-NMR.

    [0158] Polymers that can be used according to the present disclosure also include blended films and multi-layer laminates.

    [0159] In some embodiments, the polymer is high density polyethylene having a number average molecular weight (M.sub.n) of 5000-100000 Da.

    [0160] According to the present disclosure, the step of subjecting the polymer to a hydrogenolysis reaction in the presence of a catalyst can be carried out at a hydrogen partial pressure of about 15 psia to about 1000 psia, about 20 psia to about 800 psia, about 50 psia to about 500 psia, about 75 psia to about 250 psia, or about 100 psia to about 200 psia.

    [0161] According to the present disclosure, the step of subjecting the polymer to a hydrogenolysis reaction in the presence of a catalyst can be carried out at a temperature of about 150 C. to about 400 C., about 200 C. to about 350 C., or about 550 C. to about 300 C.

    [0162] In some embodiments, the catalyst comprises a plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles; and a mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounding the plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles. The mesoporous silica-containing shell has an outer surface and an inner surface inside the outer surface, the outer surface having openings leading to pores extending through the mesoporous silica-containing shell to the inner surface. The metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, molybdenum oxide, scandium oxide, yttrium oxide, and lanthanum oxide.

    [0163] In some embodiments, the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, and molybdenum oxide. In one embodiment, the metal oxide is zirconium oxide.

    [0164] In some embodiments, the plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles is present in the form of a layer.

    [0165] In one embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    [0166] In some embodiments, the metal oxide is an amorphous material. In one embodiment, the zirconia oxide nanoparticles are amorphous zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    [0167] In some embodiments, the metal oxide is a crystalline material. In one embodiment, the zirconia oxide nanoparticles are crystalline zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    [0168] In some embodiments, the metal oxide is a nanocrystalline material.

    [0169] According to the present disclosure, the metal oxide can have a mean particle diameter of about 0.5 to about 100 nm, about 1 to about 100 nm, about 10 to about 100 nm, about 20 to about 100 nm, about 40 to about 100 nm, about 50 to about 100 nm, about 10 to about 90 nm, about 10 to about 80 nm, about 10 to about 70 nm, about 10 to about 60 nm, about 10 to about 50 nm, about 10 to about 40 nm, about 10 to about 30 nm, about 10 to about 20 nm, about 1 to about 50 nm, about 1 to about 40 nm, about 1 to about 20 nm, about 5 to about 20 nm, about 5 to about 15 nm, about 5 to about 10 nm, about 6 to about 9 nm, about 7 to about 8 nm, about 0.5 to about 10 nm, about 0.5 to about 9 nm, about 0.5 to about 8 nm, about 0.5 to about 7 nm, about 0.5 to about 6 nm, about 0.5 to about 5 nm, about 0.5 to about 4 nm, about 0.5 to about 3 nm, or about 0.5 to about 2 nm.

    [0170] According to the present disclosure, the metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 0.1 nm to about 1000 nm, about 1 nm to about 1000 nm, about 5 nm to about 1000 nm, about 10 nm to about 1000 nm, about 15 nm to about 1000 nm, about 20 nm to about 1000 nm, about 10 nm to about 900 nm, about 10 nm to about 800 nm, about 10 nm to about 700 nm, about 10 nm to about 600 nm, about 10 nm to about 500 nm, about 10 nm to about 400 nm, about 10 nm to about 300 nm, about 10 nm to about 200 nm, about 10 nm to about 100 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 500 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 250 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 100 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 50 nm, about 1 nm to about 500 nm, about 1 nm to about 50 nm, about 2 nm to about 40 nm, about 3 nm to about 30 nm, about 4 nm to about 20 nm, about 5 nm to about 10 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 10 nm, about 0.2 nm to about 9 nm, about 0.3 nm to about 8 nm, about 0.4 nm to about 7 nm, about 0.4 nm to about 6 nm, about 0.5 nm to about 5 nm, about 0.6 nm to about 5 nm, about 0.7 nm to about 4 nm, or about 0.8 nm to about 3 nm. The metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 0.1 nm, about 0.25 nm, about 0.5 nm, about 0.75 nm, about 1 nm, about 1.25 nm, about 1.5 nm, about 1.75 nm, about 2 nm, about 2.25 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 2.75 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.25 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 3.75 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, about 5 nm, about 5.5 nm, about 6 nm, about 6.5 nm, about 7 nm, about 7.5 nm, about 8 nm, about 8.5 nm, about 9 nm, about 9.5 nm, or about 10 nm. In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 0.5 nm, about 1 nm, about 1.5 nm, about 2 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, or about 5 nm.

    [0171] According to the present disclosure, the catalyst comprises the mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounds the layer of metal oxide nanoparticles. The metal oxide nanoparticles can be surrounded by one or more layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell (e.g., one layer, two layers, three layers, etc.). In one embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by one layer of mesoporous silica-containing shell. In another embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by two layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell. In another embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by three layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell.

    [0172] According to the present disclosure, the layer of the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 10 nm to about 2000 nm. The thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell is a distance between the outer surfaces of the mesoporous silica-containing shell.

    [0173] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by one layer of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the mesoporous silica-containing shell can have a total thickness of about 10 nm to about 500 nm, about 20 nm to about 400 nm, about 30 nm to about 300 nm, about 40 nm to about 200 nm, about 50 nm to about 100 nm, or about 60 nm to about 90 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 10 nm, about 20 nm, about 30 nm, about 40 nm, about 50 nm, about 60 nm, about 70 nm, about 80 nm, about 90 nm, about 100 nm, about 110 nm, about 120 nm, about 130 nm, about 140 nm, or about 150 nm. In one embodiment, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 70 nm.

    [0174] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by two layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the total thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell can be about 20 nm to about 1000 nm, about 40 nm to about 800 nm, about 60 nm to about 600 nm, about 80 nm to about 400 nm, about 100 nm to about 200 nm, or about 120 nm to about 180 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 20 nm, about 40 nm, about 50 nm, about 60 nm, about 70 nm, about 80 nm, about 90 nm, about 100 nm, about 110 nm, about 120 nm, about 130 nm, about 140 nm, about 150 nm, about 160 nm, about 170 nm, about 180 nm, about 190 nm, about 200 nm, about 220 nm, about 240 nm, about 260 nm, about 280 nm, or about 300 nm.

    [0175] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by three layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the total thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell can be about 30 nm to about 1500 nm, about 60 nm to about 1200 nm, about 90 nm to about 900 nm, about 120 nm to about 600 nm, about 150 nm to about 300 nm, or about 180 nm to about 270 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 40 nm, about 60 nm, about 80 nm, about 100 nm, about 120 nm, about 140 nm, about 160 nm, about 180 nm, about 200 nm, about 220 nm, about 240 nm, about 260 nm, about 280 nm, about 300 nm, about 400 nm, or about 500 nm.

    [0176] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by four or more layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the total thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell can be about 50 nm to about 2000 nm, about 75 nm to about 1750 nm, about 100 nm to about 1500 nm, about 125 nm to about 1250 nm, about 150 nm to about 1000 nm, about 175 nm to about 750 nm, or about 200 nm to about 500 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 50 nm, about 75 nm, about 100 nm, about 125 nm, about 150 nm, about 175 nm, about 200 nm, about 225 nm, about 250 nm, about 275 nm, about 300 nm, about 350 nm, about 400 nm, about 500 nm, about 600 nm, about 700 nm, about 800 nm, about 900 nm, about 1000 nm, or about 1500 nm.

    [0177] According to the present disclosure, the pores present in the mesoporous silica-containing shell can have a diameter from about 1 nm to about 10 nm, about 1.5 nm to about 9 nm, about 2 nm to about 8 nm, about 2.5 nm to about 7 nm, about 3 nm to about 6 nm, about 3 nm to about 5 nm, or about 3 nm to about 4 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has a pore diameter of about 2 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, or about 5 nm. In one embodiment, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has a pore diameter of about 3.5 nm.

    [0178] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by one layer of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the length of the pores can be of about 5 nm to about 250 nm, about 10 nm to about 200 nm, about 15 nm to about 150 nm, about 20 nm to about 100 nm, about 25 nm to about 50 nm, or about 30 nm to about 45 nm. In some embodiments, the length of the pores in the mesoporous silica-containing shell is about 5 nm, about 10 nm, about 15 nm, about 20 nm, about 25 nm, about 30 nm, about 35 nm, about 40 nm, about 45 nm, about 50 nm, about 55 nm, about 60 nm, about 65 nm, about 70 nm, or about 75 nm. In one embodiment, the length of the pores in the mesoporous silica-containing shell is about 35 nm.

    [0179] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise about 0.0001 wt % to about 20.0 wt % of the catalyst. For example, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise about 0.0001 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 5.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 1.0 wt %, about 0.001 wt % to about 20.0 wt %, about 0.001 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.005 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.005 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.01 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.05 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.1 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.1 wt % to about 5.0 wt %, about 1 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 1 wt % to about 7.5 wt %, about 2.5 wt % to about 7.5 wt %, about 4 wt % to about 5.5 wt %, or about 4.5 wt % to about 5.5 wt % of the catalyst. In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles comprise about 3 wt %, about 3.5 wt %, about 4 wt %, about 4.5 wt %, about 5 wt %, about 5.5 wt %, about 6 wt %, about 6.5 wt % of the catalyst. In one embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles comprise about 4 wt %, about 4.5 wt %, about 5 wt %, or about 5.5 wt % of the catalyst.

    [0180] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise less than 0.0001 wt % of the catalyst. For example, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise less than 0.0001 wt %, less than 0.00005 wt %, or less than 0.00001 wt % of the catalyst.

    [0181] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise more than 20 wt % of the catalyst. For example, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise more than 25 wt %, more than 30 wt %, more than 35 wt %, more than 40 wt %, more than 45 wt %, more than 50 wt %, more than 55 wt %, more than 60 wt %, or more than 65 wt % of the catalyst.

    [0182] According to the present disclosure, the pores of the mesoporous silica-containing shell have a diameter selected to permit a length of the polymer to enter the pores which yield a particular segment length as a result of hydrogenolysis.

    [0183] In some embodiments, the products that are formed during the hydrogenolysis reaction leave the catalyst through pores present in the mesoporous silica-containing shell. These products are different from the reactant which entered the mesoporous silica-containing shell.

    [0184] In some embodiments, the polymer has a longitudinal extent between opposed ends and the step of subjecting the polymer to a hydrogenolysis reaction comprises extending an end of the polymer through the openings and into the pores of the mesoporous silica shell and cleaving the polymer into hydrocarbon segments in the pores using the metal oxide.

    [0185] In some embodiments, the products that are formed during the hydrogenolysis reaction include gases, liquids, and/or waxes.

    [0186] In some embodiments, the product is a liquid containing from C.sub.5 to C.sub.20 hydrocarbons, from C.sub.12 to C.sub.20 hydrocarbons, from C.sub.6 to C.sub.18 hydrocarbons, from C to C.sub.16 hydrocarbons, from C.sub.6 to C.sub.16 hydrocarbons, or from C.sub.5 to C.sub.15 hydrocarbons. In some embodiments, the liquid has Gaussian-type centered distribution from C.sub.6 to C.sub.18, from C.sub.8 to C.sub.16, from C.sub.6 to C.sub.16, or from C.sub.5 to C.sub.18 of hydrocarbons. In some embodiments, the liquid has Gaussian-type C.sub.12-, C.sub.13-, C.sub.14-, C.sub.15-, C.sub.16-, C.sub.17-, C.sub.18-, C.sub.19-, C.sub.20-, C.sub.21-, C.sub.22-, C.sub.23-, C.sub.24-, or C.sub.25-centered distribution of hydrocarbons. Typically, the hydrocarbons can be linear or branched, wherein the heavier hydrocarbons tend to be branched to form liquids.

    [0187] In some embodiments, the product is a wax containing from C.sub.16 to C.sub.100 hydrocarbons, from C.sub.20 to C.sub.80 hydrocarbons, from C.sub.25 to C.sub.60 hydrocarbons, or from C.sub.30 to C.sub.50 hydrocarbons. In some embodiments, the wax has Gaussian-type centered distribution from C.sub.16 to C.sub.100, from C.sub.20 to C.sub.80, from C.sub.25 to C.sub.60, or from C.sub.30 to C.sub.50 of hydrocarbons. In some embodiments, the wax has Gaussian-type C.sub.20-, C.sub.21-, C.sub.22-, C.sub.23-, C.sub.24-, C.sub.25-, C.sub.26-, C.sub.27-, C.sub.28-, C.sub.29-, C.sub.30-, C.sub.31-, C.sub.32-, C.sub.3-, C.sub.34-, C.sub.35-, C.sub.36-, C.sub.37-, C.sub.38-, C.sub.39-, or C.sub.40-centered distribution of hydrocarbons. Typically, linear C.sub.16 to C.sub.100 hydrocarbons form waxes.

    [0188] Another aspect of the present disclosure relates to a method of preparing a catalyst. This method includes: providing a graphene oxide; providing a metal containing compound; adding the metal containing compound to the graphene oxide to form a plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on the graphene oxide. The method further involves contacting the plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on the graphene oxide with a silicon containing compound and a pore structure-directing agent to produce a mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounding the plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on the graphene oxide, where the mesoporous silica-containing shell has an outer surface and an inner surface inside the outer surface, the outer surface having openings leading to pores extending through the mesoporous silica-containing shell to the inner surface. This method further involves calcinating the mesoporous silica-containing shell containing the plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on graphene oxide to produce a mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounding the plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles, where the mesoporous silica-containing shell has an outer surface and an inner surface inside the outer surface, the outer surface having openings leading to pores extending through the mesoporous silica-containing shell to the inner surface; where the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, molybdenum oxide, scandium oxide, yttrium oxide, and lanthanum oxide.

    [0189] In some embodiments, graphene oxide was added to a solution of urea in water (such as DI-water) and the mixture was treated in an ultrasonication bath prior to the step of adding the metal containing compound. Ultrasonication can be carried out for about 10 min, about 20 min, about 30 min, about 40 min, about 50 min, or about 60 min. In some embodiments, after ultrasonication, a suspension of graphene oxide is formed.

    [0190] In some embodiments, the metal containing compound is dissolved in a suitable solvent prior to adding it to graphene oxide. Suitable solvents that can be used to dissolve metal containing compound include water, such as DI-water, alcohols, amines, acetonitrile, acetone, acetic acid, dimethyl sulfoxide, and tetrahydrofuran.

    [0191] In some embodiments, the solution of metal containing compound is added to the suspension of graphene oxide to form a plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on the graphene oxide.

    [0192] In some embodiments, the plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on the graphene oxide are formed by stirring the mixture containing metal containing compound and suspension graphene oxide.

    [0193] In some embodiments, the method of preparing a catalyst includes washing the mesoporous silica-containing shell containing the plurality of metal hydrate oxide nanoparticles supported on graphene oxide prior to calcinating.

    [0194] In some embodiments, the metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, niobium oxide, cerium oxide, and molybdenum oxide. In one embodiment, the metal oxide is zirconium oxide.

    [0195] In some embodiments, the plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles is present in the form of a layer.

    [0196] In some embodiments, the plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles is present in the form of a uniform layer. In other embodiments, the plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles is not uniformly distributed.

    [0197] In one embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    [0198] In some embodiments, the metal oxide is an amorphous material. In one embodiment, the zirconia oxide nanoparticles are amorphous zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    [0199] In some embodiments, the metal oxide is a crystalline material. In one embodiment, the zirconia oxide nanoparticles are crystalline zirconia oxide nanoparticles.

    [0200] In some embodiments, the metal oxide is a nanocrystalline material.

    [0201] According to the present disclosure, the metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 0.1 nm to about 1000 nm, about 1 nm to about 1000 nm, about 5 nm to about 1000 nm, about 10 nm to about 1000 nm, about 15 nm to about 1000 nm, about 20 nm to about 1000 nm, about 10 nm to about 900 nm, about 10 nm to about 800 nm, about 10 nm to about 700 nm, about 10 nm to about 600 nm, about 10 nm to about 500 nm, about 10 nm to about 400 nm, about 10 nm to about 300 nm, about 10 nm to about 200 nm, about 10 nm to about 100 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 500 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 250 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 100 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 50 nm, about 1 nm to about 500 nm, about 1 nm to about 50 nm, about 2 nm to about 40 nm, about 3 nm to about 30 nm, about 4 nm to about 20 nm, about 5 nm to about 10 nm, about 0.1 nm to about 10 nm, about 0.2 nm to about 9 nm, about 0.3 nm to about 8 nm, about 0.4 nm to about 7 nm, about 0.4 nm to about 6 nm, about 0.5 nm to about 5 nm, about 0.6 nm to about 5 nm, about 0.7 nm to about 4 nm, or about 0.8 nm to about 3 nm. The metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 0.1 nm, about 0.25 nm, about 0.5 nm, about 0.75 nm, about 1 nm, about 1.25 nm, about 1.5 nm, about 1.75 nm, about 2 nm, about 2.25 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 2.75 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.25 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 3.75 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, about 5 nm, about 5.5 nm, about 6 nm, about 6.5 nm, about 7 nm, about 7.5 nm, about 8 nm, about 8.5 nm, about 9 nm, about 9.5 nm, or about 10 nm. In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles have a mean particle diameter of about 0.5 nm, about 1 nm, about 1.5 nm, about 2 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, or about 5 nm.

    [0202] According to the present disclosure, the catalyst comprises the mesoporous silica-containing shell surrounds the layer of metal oxide nanoparticles. The metal oxide nanoparticles can be surrounded by one or more layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell (e.g., one layer, two layers, three layers, etc.). In one embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by one layer of mesoporous silica-containing shell. In another embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by two layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell. In another embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by three layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell.

    [0203] According to the present disclosure, the layer of the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 10 nm to about 2000 nm. The thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell is a distance between the outer surfaces of the mesoporous silica-containing shell.

    [0204] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by one layer of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the mesoporous silica-containing shell can have a total thickness of about 10 nm to about 500 nm, about 20 nm to about 400 nm, about 30 nm to about 300 nm, about 40 nm to about 200 nm, about 50 nm to about 100 nm, or about 60 nm to about 90 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 10 nm, about 20 nm, about 30 nm, about 40 nm, about 50 nm, about 60 nm, about 70 nm, about 80 nm, about 90 nm, about 100 nm, about 110 nm, about 120 nm, about 130 nm, about 140 nm, or about 150 nm. In one embodiment, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 70 nm.

    [0205] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by two layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the total thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell can be about 20 nm to about 1000 nm, about 40 nm to about 800 nm, about 60 nm to about 600 nm, about 80 nm to about 400 nm, about 100 nm to about 200 nm, or about 120 nm to about 180 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 20 nm, about 40 nm, about 50 nm, about 60 nm, about 70 nm, about 80 nm, about 90 nm, about 100 nm, about 110 nm, about 120 nm, about 130 nm, about 140 nm, about 150 nm, about 160 nm, about 170 nm, about 180 nm, about 190 nm, about 200 nm, about 220 nm, about 240 nm, about 260 nm, about 280 nm, or about 300 nm.

    [0206] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by three layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the total thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell can be about 30 nm to about 1500 nm, about 60 nm to about 1200 nm, about 90 nm to about 900 nm, about 120 nm to about 600 nm, about 150 nm to about 300 nm, or about 180 nm to about 270 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 40 nm, about 60 nm, about 80 nm, about 100 nm, about 120 nm, about 140 nm, about 160 nm, about 180 nm, about 200 nm, about 220 nm, about 240 nm, about 260 nm, about 280 nm, about 300 nm, about 400 nm, or about 500 nm.

    [0207] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by four or more layers of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the total thickness of the mesoporous silica-containing shell can be about 50 nm to about 2000 nm, about 75 nm to about 1750 nm, about 100 nm to about 1500 nm, about 125 nm to about 1250 nm, about 150 nm to about 1000 nm, about 175 nm to about 750 nm, or about 200 nm to about 500 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has total thickness of about 50 nm, about 75 nm, about 100 nm, about 125 nm, about 150 nm, about 175 nm, about 200 nm, about 225 nm, about 250 nm, about 275 nm, about 300 nm, about 350 nm, about 400 nm, about 500 nm, about 600 nm, about 700 nm, about 800 nm, about 900 nm, about 1000 nm, or about 1500 nm.

    [0208] According to the present disclosure, the pores present in the mesoporous silica-containing shell can have a diameter from about 1 nm to about 10 nm, about 1.5 nm to about 9 nm, about 2 nm to about 8 nm, about 2.5 nm to about 7 nm, about 3 nm to about 6 nm, about 3 nm to about 5 nm, or about 3 nm to about 4 nm. In some embodiments, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has a pore diameter of about 2 nm, about 2.5 nm, about 3 nm, about 3.5 nm, about 4 nm, about 4.5 nm, or about 5 nm. In one embodiment, the mesoporous silica-containing shell has a pore diameter of about 3.5 nm.

    [0209] When the metal oxide nanoparticles are surrounded by one layer of mesoporous silica-containing shell, the length of the pores can be of about 5 nm to about 250 nm, about 10 nm to about 200 nm, about 15 nm to about 150 nm, about 20 nm to about 100 nm, about 25 nm to about 50 nm, or about 30 nm to about 45 nm. In some embodiments, the length of the pores in the mesoporous silica-containing shell is about 5 nm, about 10 nm, about 15 nm, about 20 nm, about 25 nm, about 30 nm, about 35 nm, about 40 nm, about 45 nm, about 50 nm, about 55 nm, about 60 nm, about 65 nm, about 70 nm, or about 75 nm. In one embodiment, the length of the pores in the mesoporous silica-containing shell is about 35 nm.

    [0210] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise about 0.0001 wt % to about 20.0 wt % of the catalyst. For example, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise about 0.0001 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 5.0 wt %, about 0.0001 wt % to about 1.0 wt %, about 0.001 wt % to about 20.0 wt %, about 0.001 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.005 wt % to about 15.0 wt %, about 0.005 wt % to about 10.0 wt 9%, about 0.01 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.05 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.1 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, about 0.1 wt % to about 5.0 wt %, about 1 wt % to about 10.0 wt %, 1 wt % to about 7.5 wt %, about 2.5 wt % to about 7.5 wt %, about 4 wt % to about 5.5 wt %, or about 4.5 wt % to about 5.5 wt % of the catalyst. In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles comprise about 3 wt %, about 3.5 wt %, about 4 wt %, about 4.5 wt %, about 5 wt %, about 5.5 wt %, about 6 wt %, about 6.5 wt % of the catalyst. In one embodiment, the metal oxide nanoparticles comprise about 4 wt %, about 4.5 wt %, about 5 wt %, or about 5.5 wt % of the catalyst.

    [0211] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise less than 0.0001 wt % of the catalyst. For example, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise less than 0.0001 wt %, less than 0.00005 wt %, or less than 0.00001 wt % of the catalyst.

    [0212] In some embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise more than 20 wt % of the catalyst. For example, the metal oxide nanoparticles can comprise more than 25 wt %, more than 30 wt %, more than 35 wt %, more than 40 wt %, more than 45 wt %, more than 50 wt %, more than 55 wt %, more than 60 wt %, or more than 65 wt % of the catalyst.

    [0213] In some embodiments, the metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles are zirconium oxyhydroxide nanoparticles.

    [0214] In some embodiments, the metal containing compound is a metal salt. In some embodiments, the metal salt is selected from a group consisting of zirconium (IV) chloride, irconium (IV) isopropoxide, hafnium (IV) oxychloride hydrate, hafnium (IV) chloride, titanium (IV) isopropoxide, titanium (IV) chloride, cerium (III) nitrate hexahydrate, niobium (V) oxalate, niobium (V) chloride, bis(acetylacetonato)dioxomolybdenum (VI), and ammonium molybdate.

    [0215] In some embodiments, the graphene oxide is provided in the form of a single-layer graphene oxide sheet.

    [0216] In some embodiments, the plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles covers both top and bottom sides of the graphene oxide sheet. In some embodiments, the plurality of metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles covers all the sides of the graphene oxide sheet.

    [0217] Before the calcination step, the pores in the mesoporous silica-containing shell are filled with the pore structure-directing agent. During the calcination step, the pore structure-directing agent is removed from the pores.

    [0218] Also, during the calcination step the metal oxide hydrate nanoparticles supported on the graphene oxide are converted into metal oxide particles and graphene oxide is removed.

    [0219] According to the present disclosure, the calcination step can be conducted at about 400 to about at 700 C., about 400 to about at 600 C., or about 450 to about at 650 C. In some embodiments, the calcination step is performed at about 400 C., about at 450 C., about at 500 C., about at 550 C., or about at 600 C. In one embodiment, the calcination step is performed at about at 500 C.

    [0220] In some embodiments, the silicon-containing compound is tetraethyl orthosilicate.

    [0221] In some embodiments, the pore structure-directing agents are ionic surfactants (e.g., myristyltrimethylammonium bromide, hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide, dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide, etc.) or block copolymers (e.g., P123, Pluronic F127, etc.).

    [0222] The above disclosure is general. A more specific description is provided below in the following examples. The examples are described solely for the purpose of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the present application. Changes in form and substitution of equivalents are contemplated as circumstances suggest or render expedient. Although specific terms have been employed herein, such terms are intended in a descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.

    EXAMPLES

    [0223] The following Examples are presented to illustrate various aspects of the present application, but are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed application.

    Example 1Chemicals and Materials

    [0224] All chemicals and starting materials used were commercially obtained and used as received without further purification. Zirconium oxide (30 nm) (ZrO.sub.2-30) was purchased from Aldrich. Single-layer graphene oxide (GO, 99 wt. %) was purchased from Cheap Tubes Inc. Zirconium tetrachloride (ZrCl.sub.4, 99.99%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Urea (CH.sub.4N.sub.2O, 99%) and sodium hydroxide (98%) were purchased from Fisher Scientific. Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 98%), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, >98%), ethylenediamine (>99%), hydrochloric acid (35-38%, TraceMetal grade), hydrofluoric acid (48-51% solution in water, TraceMetal grade), nitric acid (67-71%, TraceMetal grade), and polyethylene (PE, M.sub.n=20 kDa, M.sub.w=96 kDa, =4.8) were purchased from Alfa Aesar. All three inorganic acids were certified to contain less than <1 ppb of Co, Cu, Fe, Ni, Ru, Pd, Pt, Rh, Al, Sb, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Cd, Ca, Ce, Cs, Cr, Dy, Er, Eu, Gd, Ga, Ge, Au, Hf, Ho, In, La, Pb, Li, Lu, Mg, Mn, Hg, Mo, Na, Nd, Nb, K, Pr, Re, Rb, Sm, Sc, Sc, Ag, Na, Sr, Ta, Te, Tb, Tl, Th, Tm, Sn, Ti, W, U, V, Yb, Y, Zn, and Zr. The deionized water (DI-H.sub.2O) was generated with a Millipore water purification system (Milli-Q plus) operating at a resistivity of 18.2 M.Math.cm @ 25 C.

    Example 2Synthesis of L-ZrO.SUB.2.@mSiO.SUB.2

    [0225] L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 was prepared through a two-step synthesis method. In the first step, precipitated zirconium oxyhydroxide nanoparticles were deposited onto single-layer graphene oxide (GO) in an aqueous solution to give ZrO.sub.2-x(OH).sub.2x/GO. That material was prepared as follows: urea (0.150 g) was dissolved in DI-H.sub.2O (100 mL), GO (10 mg) was added, and the mixture was treated in an ultrasonication bath for 30 min. An aqueous solution of ZrCl.sub.4 (0.024 g in 1.25 mL of H.sub.2O) was added dropwise to the GO suspension, and the mixture was stirred for 3 hours at room temperature. The mixture was subsequently stirred and heated at 90 C. for 12 hours. The solid ZrO.sub.2-x(OH).sub.2x/GO product was collected by centrifugation, washed with DI-H.sub.2O (350 mL), and then dispersed into H.sub.2O (10 mL). In the second step, mesoporous silica (mSiO.sub.2) layers were grown onto ZrO.sub.2-x(OH).sub.2x/GO following the procedure described below for the synthesis of mSiO.sub.2 platelets. The final product was characterized and displayed a double-layered platelet structure with ultrasmall ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles in the narrow core.

    Example 3Catalytic Hydrogenolysis

    [0226] The catalytic hydrogenolysis of polyolefins was performed in a glass-lined high-pressure autoclave reactor (250 mL, Parr Instruments) equipped with a mechanical impeller-style stirrer and a thermocouple that extends into the melted polymer (Tennakoon et al., Catalytic Upcycling of High-Density Polyethylene Via a Processive Mechanism, Nat. Catal. 3:893-901 (2020), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). Polyethylene (PE) (3.0 g, M.sub.n=20,000, =4.8) and a catalyst (5.5 mg) were placed into the glass-lined reaction vessel. The reactor was assembled, and the system was evacuated under reduced pressure (100 Pa) and then refilled with Ar (3). H.sub.2 was introduced to the desired pressure (0.482 MPa) at room temperature, and the reactor was sealed. The reactor was heated to 300 C., the gauge pressure increased to 0.896 MPa for experiments running 2-20 hours. All pressure values are reported as the absolute pressure at reaction temperature (0.992 MPa=0.896 MPa on the pressure gauge). At the end of the designated time, the reactor was allowed to cool to room temperature. The volatile products were sampled by connecting the cooled reactor to a GC sampling loop and analyzed by gas chromatography-flame ionized detector (GC-FID) and GC-thermal conductivity detector (TCD). The mass yield of gas-phase products was obtained from direct GC-calibrated quantitative analysis of C.sub.1-C.sub.9 hydrocarbons separated on an Agilent Technologies 5890 GC system using an Agilent J&W GS-GasPro (0.32 mm15 m) capillary column (GC-FID). H.sub.2 was quantified with respect to a He internal standard using a Supelco Carboxen 1000 (15 ft. in.2.1 mm SS) packed column (GC-TCD). Dichloromethane was added to the reactor, which was rescaled and heated to 100 C. The reactor was cooled, and the mixture was filtered on a Buchner funnel to separate residual insoluble polymer from the dichloromethane-soluble liquid products. The volatile components were evaporated in a rotary evaporator, and the yields of extracted liquid species and solid materials were measured. The soluble materials were analyzed by calibrated gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using an Agilent Technologies 7890A GC system equipped with an FID or an Agilent Technologies 5975 C inert MSD mass spectrometer on an Agilent J&W DB-5ht ((5%-phenyl)-methylpolysiloxane, 0.25 mm30 m0.1 m) capillary column (see Quantification of Liquid Products for details). The solid portion was dissolved in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB) at 150 C. and analyzed by high temperature gel permeation chromatography (HT-GPC).

    Example 4Analysis

    Analysis of Reaction Products

    [0227] The solid polymeric residue was analyzed by HT-GPC (Agilent-Polymer Laboratories 220) to determine the molecular weights (M.sub.n and M.sub.w) and molecular weight distributions (=M.sub.w/M.sub.n). The HT-GPC was equipped with refractive index (RI) and viscometry detectors. Monodisperse polyethylene standards (PSS Polymer Standards Service, Inc.) were used for calibration ranging from 330 Da to 120 kDa. The column set included 3 Agilent PL-Gel Mixed B columns and 1 PL-Gel Mixed B guard column. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (TCB) containing 0.01 wt % 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as the eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 160 C. The lubricant samples were prepared in TCB at a concentration of 5.0 mg/mL and heated at 150 C. for 24 hours prior to injection.

    Quantification of Liquid Products

    [0228] The composition of the dichloromethane-extracted liquid products, in terms of amounts of each chain length in the samples, was estimated using previously reported approach (Tennakoon et al., Catalytic Upcycling of High-Density Polyethylene Via a Processive Mechanism, Nat. Catal. 3:893-901 (2020), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), summarized here briefly for convenience: A GC-MS of the ASTM standard was integrated. A plot of integrated area vs. carbon number allowed the determination of response of all Cn (since ASTM standard does not include C.sub.13, C.sub.19, C.sub.21, etc.) by interpolation. The regions of C.sub.6-C.sub.20 and C.sub.20-C.sub.40 were linear, but with inequivalent slopes. Therefore, these two regions were fit separately and used as calibration curves for liquid products.

    Example 5-Characterization of Catalytic Materials for Comparisons with L-ZrO.SUB.2.@mSiO.SUB.2

    Synthesis of mSiO.sub.2 Platelets

    [0229] Mesoporous silica platelets (mSiO.sub.2) were prepared following a procedure adapted from the literature (Wang et al., Graphene Oxide-Periodic Mesoporous Silica Sandwich Nanocomposites with Vertically Oriented Channels, ACS Nano 4:7437-7450 (2010), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). GO (30 mg), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) (1.00 g, 2.74 mmol), and sodium hydroxide (0.2 g, 5.0 mmol) were first added into deionized water (DI-H.sub.2O, 45 mL), and then the mixture was subjected to ultrasonication for 3 hours. The mixture was heated to 40 C. and stirred rapidly for 1 hour, and then tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) (1 mL, 0.94 g, 9.6 mmol) was added in a dropwise fashion to grow mesoporous silica on GO. The reaction mixture was further heated at 40 C. for 24 hours. The solid product was collected by centrifugation, washed with DI-H.sub.2O (550 mL), and washed with ethanol (250 mL). The solid product was then redispersed into DI-H.sub.2O, and the above mSiO.sub.2 growth process was repeated 2 times. Finally, the solid product was dried in an oven at 80 C. and then calcined at 550 C. for 6 hours in a box furnace. The final product was then characterized and exhibited a double-layered platelet structure with a narrow empty core.

    Synthesis of Imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2

    [0230] ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles were deposited throughout the pores and on the external surface of mSiO.sub.2 platelets by the incipient wetness impregnation method. ZrCl.sub.4 (0.044 g) as a methanol solution (0.5 mL) was added in a dropwise manner to the previously prepared mSiO.sub.2 platelets (150 mg) while being mixed by a glass rod. The sample was dried in a laboratory oven at 80 C. and then calcined in a box furnace at 550 C. for 6 hours. The final product was characterized by STEM (FIGS. 1A-F), which showed a well-dispersed ZrO.sub.2 throughout imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 particles.

    Preparation of ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2

    [0231] ZrO(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.xH.sub.2O (6.374 g) was dissolved in DI-H.sub.2O (15 mL) to form solution A. Urea (10.811 g, 0.18 mol) was dissolved in DI-H.sub.2O (15 mL) to form solution B. Solution A and B were mixed to obtain a solution with the Zr concentration of 0.6 M. The mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and heated at 180 C. for 21 hours to give a white crystalline precipitate. The white precipitate was collected, washed with DI-H.sub.2O (250 mL), and then washed with methanol (250 mL). The washed sample was redispersed into methanol (38 mL) to obtain suspension C containing 2.2 g of ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles. To prepare the ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 with a ZrO.sub.2 loading of 5 wt. %, mSiO.sub.2 platelets (50 mg) were mixed with suspension C (35 mg) diluted by methanol (0.25 mL). The mixture was dried in an oven at 60 C. and then calcined at 550 C. for 6 hours. The final ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 product was characterized by STEM (FIGS. 2A-C), which showed that the ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles are distributed solely on the external surfaces of layered mSiO.sub.2 or are separate aggregates not on the mSiO.sub.2 support.

    Synthesis of L-Pt@mSiO.SUB.2

    [0232] The preparation of L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2 followed a modified procedure from the synthesis of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2. In the first step, urea (0.150 g) was dissolved in DI-H.sub.2O (100 mL), GO (10 mg) was added, and the mixture was treated in an ultrasonication bath for 30 min. Subsequently, an aqueous solution of H.sub.2PtCl.sub.6.Math.6H.sub.2O (0.033 g in 1.25 mL) was added dropwise to the GO suspension, and the mixture was stirred for 3 hours at room temperature. The mixture was stirred and heated at 90 C. for 12 hours. The solid PtO.sub.2-x(OH).sub.2x/GO product was collected by centrifugation, washed with DI-H.sub.2O (350 mL), and then dispersed into water (10 mL). In the second step, mesoporous silica (mSiO.sub.2) was grown onto PtO.sub.2-x(OH).sub.2x/GO following a modified procedure of the one described for the synthesis of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2, in which PtO.sub.2-x(OH).sub.2x/GO (rather than ZrO.sub.2-x(OH).sub.2x/GO) was used as the starting materials for the synthesis. Finally, the L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2 product was obtained after calcination at 550 C. for 6 hours and characterized by STEM with the particle size of 3.50.8 nm (FIG. 12C). Like the ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2, Pt nanoparticles were localized in the middle of mSiO.sub.2 shells (FIGS. 3A-B).

    Characterization of Catalytic Materials

    Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD)

    [0233] The PXRD patterns of ZrO.sub.2-based samples were collected on a Bruker D8 Advance Twin diffractometer (Ni-filtered Cu K radiation with a wavelength of 1.5406 , operated at 40 kV and. 40 mA, VANTEC-position-sensitive detector) at a scan speed of 2.0 degrees per min and a step size of 0.02 degrees in 2.

    Nitrogen Gas (N.SUB.2.) Physisorption

    [0234] The sorption experiments on ZrO.sub.2-based and Pt-containing samples were conducted using a Micromeritics 3Flex surface characterization analyzer at 77 K. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area was calculated according to the BET equation, using nitrogen sorption isotherms in the relative pressure range from 0.01 to 0.2. The mesopore size distributions were obtained using Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method assuming a cylindrical pore model, and the desorption branches of isotherms were used for the calculation.

    Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)

    [0235] The elemental analysis of the ZrO.sub.2 and Pt-based catalysts was carried out on a Thermo Scientific X Series II mass spectrometer. The samples (1.5 mg) are first treated with hydrofluoric acid (80 L) to etch away silica or dissolve the ZrO.sub.2 particles, and then digested with aqua regia (4 mL). The final solutions were diluted with 2.0 v/v % nitric acid to target concentrations for the ICP-MS measurement. The control samples and blanks were treated following the same procedure described above.

    Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy

    [0236] High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) maps of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 were acquired on a FEI Titan Themis 300 probe-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope under 200 kV accelerating voltage. Prior to the imaging, about 1 mg of the ZrO.sub.2-based samples was embedded in 1 mL of Epon epoxy resin and sectioned at 50 nm thickness on a Leica UC6 ultramicrotome with a DiATOME diamond knife.

    Example 6Results and Discussion of Examples 1-5

    Synthesis and Catalyst Structure

    [0237] L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 was designed for zirconium-catalyzed polyolefin deconstruction (FIGS. 4 and 5A-F). Ultrasmall ZrO.sub.x(OH).sub.4-2x nanoparticles were dispersed on graphene oxide (GO) sheets (FIGS. 6A-C), mSiO.sub.2 layers were grown on the ZrO.sub.x(OH).sub.4-2x/GO, and the resulting material was washed and calcined to remove structure-directing agents. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 revealed a ZrO.sub.2 loading of 4.7 wt. % (Table 1). ICP-MS analyses of three batches of as-synthesized L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 catalysts (Table 2) ruled out the presence of any other transition metals in the catalyst, including Ru, Rh, Pt, Pd, Au, Rc, Os, Ir, Ni, Fc, Co, Cu, Zn, Mo, W, Cd, Ce, Hf, Ti, and V. The elemental purity of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 was further supported by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (FIG. 7) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX; FIG. 8A-B).

    TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Source and Characteristics of Catalysts Catalyst Loading SSA.sub.BET D.sub.pore Entry Catalyst Source [wt. %] [m.sup.2/g] [nm].sup.d 1 mSiO.sub.2 Syn..sup.a 0.0 1022 3.6 2 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 Syn..sup.a 4.7 973 3.7 3 imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 Syn..sup.a 4.1 959 3.6 4 ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 Syn..sup.a 6.0 966 3.8 5 ZrO.sub.2-30 Aldrich.sup.b 100 37 n.a..sup.e 6 L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2 Syn..sup.a 3.6 909 3.4 7 Pt/C Alfa Aesar.sup.c 7.1 n.a. n.a. .sup.aSynthesized in this work. .sup.bPurchased from Aldrich. .sup.cPurchased from Alfa Aesar. .sup.dPore size calculated from the desorption branch of nitrogen gas sorption isotherm using BJH method. .sup.eNot applicable.

    TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Weight Percentage of Metal in Zro.sub.2-Based Catalytic Materials, Potentially Present as Trace Impurities.sup.a Spent L-ZrO.sub.2 L-ZrO.sub.2 L-ZrO.sub.2 L-ZrO.sub.2 ZrO.sub.2-6/ imp-ZrO.sub.2/ Metal @mSiO.sub.2_1 @mSiO.sub.2_2 @mSiO.sub.2_3 @mSiO.sub.2_3 mSiO.sub.2 mSiO.sub.2 Ru 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Rh 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Pd 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Pt 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Au 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Re 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Ir 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Os 0.000% 0.000% 0.004% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Fe <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% 0.001% <0.000% <0.000% Co 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% Ni 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% <0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Cu 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.004% 0.003% 0.000% Zn 0.002% 0.003% <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% Mo 0.000% 0.000% <0.000% 0.010% <0.000% <0.000% W 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Cd 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% Ce 0.001% 0.000% <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% Hf 0.000% 0.000% <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% Ti 0.000% 0.011% <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% V 0.000% 0.000% <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% <0.000% .sup.aWeight percentage was calculated based on the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) Analyses.sup.b .sup.bL-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 was measured from three separately digested samples and labeled as L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2_1, L-ZrO.sub.2 @mSiO.sub.2_2, and L-ZrO.sub.2 @mSiO.sub.2_3.

    [0238] The performance of L-ZrO.sub.2@SiO.sub.2 is best understood through comparisons to the behavior of several reference catalysts (Table 1). mSiO.sub.2 was synthesized by templated silica growth on GO (Yang et al., Graphene-Based Nanosheets with a Sandwich Structure, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49:4795-4799 (2010); Wang et al., Graphene Oxide-Periodic Mesoporous Silica Sandwich Nanocomposites with Vertically Oriented Channels, ACS Nano 4:7437-7450 (2010), which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety) and has the same layered platelet morphology and porous structure (FIGS. 9A-F) as L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2, imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2, produced by incipient wetness impregnation of zirconium precursors into mSiO.sub.2, contains randomly dispersed amorphous ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles (FIGS. 1A-F). ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 was prepared by immobilizing pre-synthesized 6 nm monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles (FIGS. 2A-C) on the external surface of mSiO.sub.2 (FIGS. 10A-B). ZrO.sub.2-30 and Pt/C are commercial monoclinic 30 nm-sized zirconia and 1.30.4 nm-sized platinum nanoparticles supported on carbon (FIGS. 11A-C), respectively. L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2 (FIGS. 12A-C), synthesized by deposition of PtO.sub.x(OH).sub.4-2x nanoparticles on GO (FIGS. 13A-C) followed by growth of the mSiO.sub.2 shell, creates a comparable architecture to L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 with 3.50.8 nm platinum nanoparticles instead of zirconia. The total surface area and BJH pore size for mSiO.sub.2-based samples are 900-1000 m.sup.2/g and 3.4-3.8 nm, respectively (Table 1).

    [0239] The low magnification scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image (FIG. 5A) of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 showed its separated nanoplatelet particle morphology, with lateral dimensions ranging from hundreds of nanometers to a few microns. Pore diameters of 3.40.4 nm in the mesoporous silica nanoplatelets, revealed by the higher magnification image (FIG. 5B), matched the values obtained with N.sub.2 sorption isotherm measurements (Table 1, FIGS. 3A-C). Notably, the STEM images of cross-sectioned L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 particles prepared by ultramicrotome (FIGS. 5C-E) clearly showed a thin (3 nm) bright band, identified by elemental mapping as a region of concentrated zirconium (FIG. 5F), between the two 35 nm-thick sheets of mSiO.sub.2. The mesopores in mSiO.sub.2 are aligned perpendicular to the nanoplate (FIG. 5E) (Wang et al., Graphene Oxide-Periodic Mesoporous Silica Sandwich Nanocomposites with Vertically Oriented Channels, ACS Nano 4:7437-7450 (2010); Wang et al., Sandwich-Type Nanocomposite of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Periodic Mesoporous Silica with Vertically Aligned Mesochannels of Tunable Pore Depth and Size, Adv. Func. Mater. 27:1704066 (2017), which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety), and the diameter of the ZrO.sub.2 particles is 3.00.5 nm (FIGS. 14A-B).

    [0240] The amorphous nature and chemical structure of the ultrasmall ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles in L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 were established by electron diffraction and powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD). A diffuse ring in the selected-area-electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (inset in FIG. 5A) indicated amorphous characteristics of the material, in contrast to sharp diffraction spots or rings typical of crystalline substances. The high-resolution image (FIG. 5D) further revealed that both ZrO.sub.2 and mSiO.sub.2 lack long-range order. Diffraction peaks from ZrO.sub.2 were not detected in the pXRD pattern of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 (FIG. 15).

    [0241] The thermochemical stability of ZrO.sub.2 is affected by the mSiO.sub.2 shell. Calcination of ZrO.sub.x(OH).sub.4-2x/GO at 550 C. formed a mixture of tetragonal and monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 nanocrystals (Scherrer size 5.5 and 9.3 nm, respectively; FIGS. 16A-C). Similar calcination of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 did not provide detectable signals of crystalline domains (FIG. 15). Likely, the confinement of ultrasmall ZrO.sub.2 nanoparticles within the mesopores, along with the covalent SiOZr bonding, limits their growth and crystallization.

    Polymer Deconstruction Catalysis

    [0242] Polyethylene (PE) hydrogenolysis was performed with 3 g of melted PE (M.sub.n=20 kDa, M.sub.w=91 kDa, FIGS. 17 and 18) and 5.5 mg of catalyst under 0.992 MPa of H.sub.2 at 300 C. as the standard conditions. The high mass specific catalytic activity of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 was established by the rate of CC bonds cleaved per metal mass (2.30.4 mol H.sub.2.Math.Zr g.sup.1.Math.h.sup.1). The number of CC bonds that were broken in each experiment was determined by measuring the consumption of H.sub.2 (each H.sub.2 molecule consumed corresponds to one hydrogenolyzed CC bond). The products include C.sub.1-C.sub.9 species, the C.sub.8-C.sub.50 liquid and wax fraction, and the >C.sub.50 polymeric solid residue (FIGS. 19A-B, Tables 3 and 4). The M.sub.n vs time curve follows the generally expected decay (FIG. 20).

    TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Product Compositions Plotted in FIG. 19A from the Hydrogenolysis of PE over 2-20 hours, Catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa) at 300 C. Solid H.sub.2 Con- Time PE Volatiles Liquids residue sumption (h) (g) g (%) g (%) g (%) (mmol) 2 3.009 0.067 (2.2%) 0.467 (15.5%) 2.475 (82.3%) 1.8 0.2 4 3.003 0.089 (3.0%) 0.835 (27.8%) 2.078 (69.2%) 3.1 0.6 6 3.003 0.082 (2.7%) 1.257 (42.3%) 1.664 (55.4%) 3.6 0.6 8 3.016 0.195 (6.47%) 1.659 (55.0%) 1.162 (38.5%) 5.2 0.7 12 3.004 0.230 (7.7%) 1.951 (64.9%) 0.823 (27.4%) 8.1 1.1 15 3.007 0.295 (9.8%) 2.400 (79.8%) 0.312 (10.4%) 10.3 0.8 20 3.000 0.426 (14.2%) 2.574 (85.8%) 16.1 1.4

    TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Total Cuts Calculated by Lumping all Molecular Weights of Gas-Liquid and Solid Phases Total H.sub.2 Con- Mass Activity Reaction Cuts .sup.a sumption .sup.b mol H.sub.2 .Math. Catalyst Time (h) (mmol) (mmol) g.sub.Metal.sup.1 .Math. h.sup.1 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 2 3.82 1.8 0.2 3.4 0.3 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 4 6.27 3.1 0.6 3.0 0.1 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 6 8.14 3.6 0.6 2.3 0.1 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 8 11.2 5.2 0.7 2.6 0.3 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 12 11.4 8.1 1.1 2.6 0.3 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 15 17.4 10.3 0.8 2.7 0.3 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 20 21.2 16.1 1.4 3.1 0.3 ZrO.sub.2-30 6 2.96 2.0 0.2 0.1 0.01 ZrO.sub.2-30 12 n.a. 3.2 0.5 0.1 0.02 imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 6 3.87 3.1 0.4 2.5 0.5 ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 6 2.24 1.9 0.2 1.0 0.1 ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 15 12.6 3.6 0.5 1.0 0.2 Pt/C 6 6.49 5.9 1.1 2.2 0.1 L-Pt/mSiO.sub.2 6 7.13 6.7 0.3 5.6 1 .sup.a Total Cuts are calculated from the M.sub.n of the entire population of hydrocarbon species, according to eq 3 in the Methods section of the main text. .sup.b H.sub.2 consumption correlates directly with CC bonds cleaved. This data and Total Cuts are given for comparison of the analytical methods.

    [0243] A few zirconia materials showed catalytic activity in PE hydrogenolysis, with L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 providing the highest conversion of PE and high mass-specific activity for CC bond breakage (FIG. 19C). Catalysts were compared by normalizing per ethylene hydrogenation (Table 5). L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 activity for CC bond cleavage is ca. 232 and 2.40.3 higher than the activities of ZrO.sub.2-30 and ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2, and comparable activity to imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 (Table 4). Remarkably, the activity of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 for CC cleavage was even competitive with that of Pt-based catalysts following the trend L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2Pt/C<L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2. The similar activity of Pt and confined Zr, along with the <0.001 wt % concentration of other transition metals measured by ICP-MS of as-synthesized and post-reaction zirconia catalysts, as well as catalyst-free control experiments, also ruled out trace contaminants as being catalytically important species.

    TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Ethylene Hydrogenation Conversion Catalyzed by L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 and Pure mSiO.sub.2 Platelets Temperature Conversion (%) ( C.) L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 Pure mSiO.sub.2 platelets 200 12.6 0.1 250 9.9 0.1 300 3.4 0.1 Gas Flow Rates: He: 13.2 mL/min; H.sub.2: 12.0 mL/min; C.sub.2H.sub.4: 1.20 mL/min at the ambient pressure and 200, 250, and 300 C.

    [0244] The L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2-catalyzed PE hydrogenolysis produced a narrow, Gaussian-type C.sub.18-centered distribution of liquid hydrocarbons, with C.sub.9-C.sub.27 representing >90% of the chains. This characteristic distribution was formed at the initial stage of the reaction and increased in yield in a roughly linear fashion until ca. 75% PE conversion (FIGS. 19A-B and Table 3). The volatile species, which represented the low-end tail of the product distribution, similarly increased in yield as the reaction progressed (FIGS. 21-45). After >80% conversion of the PE, the average chain length in the liquid products decreases to C.sub.16 after 15 hours (FIGS. 46-47) and sharpens after 20 hours (FIG. 19B), and the weight fraction of volatile products, mostly composed of methane and ethane, further increased (FIGS. 46-54). These observations were attributed to the secondary hydrogenolysis of the C.sub.18-centered distribution that occurred primarily at the ends of the chains. These results further indicate that L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2-catalyzed hydrogenolysis is selective for the long hydrocarbon chains of PE rather than the shorter chains of the primary products. This remarkable behavior resembles mSiO.sub.2/Pt/SiO.sub.2-catalyzed hydrogenolysis of PE (Tennakoon et al., Catalytic Upcycling of High-Density Polyethylene Via a Processive Mechanism, Nat. Catal. 3:893-901 (2020); Wu et al., Size-Controlled Nanoparticles Embedded in a Mesoporous Architecture Leading to Efficient and Selective Hydrogenolysis of Polyolefins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144:5323-5334 (2022), which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety), and contrasts the performance of the other ZrO.sub.2 catalysts, which give broader, non-Gaussian or multimodal distributions (FIG. 19E), which also vary throughout the PE conversion (Tables 4, 6, and 7, FIGS. 55-88).

    TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Product Compositions and H.sub.2 Consumption Data Used in FIG. 19A-H to Compare Catalysts in Hydrogenolysis of PE at 300 C. under H.sub.2 (0.992 MPa) Solid H.sub.2 Time PE Volatiles Liquids residue consumption Catalyst (h) (g) g (%) g (%) g (%) (mmol) mSiO.sub.2 24 3.006 0.078 (2.6%) 0.028 (0.9%) 2.900 (96.5%) n.a..sup.a ZrO.sub.2-30 6 3.001 0.020 (0.7%) 0.378 (12.6%) 2.603 (86.7%) 2.0 0.2 ZrO.sub.2-30 12 3.003 0.098 (3.3%) 0.832 (27.7%) 2.073 (69.0%) 3.2 0.5 imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 6 3.003 0.077 (2.6%) 0.603 (20.1%) 2.323 (77.4%) 3.1 0.4 ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 6 3.001 0.020 (0.7%) 0.378 (12.6%) 2.603 (86.7%) 1.9 0.2 ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 15 3.003 0.412 (13.7%) 0.754 (25.1%) 1.832 (61.0%) 3.6 0.5 Pt/C 6 3.014 0.067 (2.2%) 0.668 (22.2%) 2.279 (75.6%) 5.9 1.1 L-Pt/mSiO.sub.2 6 3.003 0.079 (2.6%) 1.546 (51.5%) 1.378 (45.9%) 6.7 0.3 .sup.aNot applicable

    TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 GPC Analysis of Polymeric Solid Residue Obtained After Catalytic Hydrogenolysis and Extraction of Small Molecules With Methylene Chloride At 100 C. Catalyst Reaction time (h) M.sub.n (Da) M.sub.w (Da) No catalyst: PE 0 20000 96000 4.8 starting material L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 2 3050 6900 2.3 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 4 1990 3800 1.9 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 6 1880 3300 1.8 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 8 1600 2700 1.7 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 12 930 1800 1.9 L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 15 1100 1990 1.8 imp-ZrO.sub.2/mSiO.sub.2 6 3000 8700 2.9 ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 6 4500 29600 6.6 ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2 15 1700 5800 3.4 ZrO.sub.2-30/mSiO.sub.2 6 3000 6000 2.0 Pt/C 6 1400 1900 1.4 L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2 6 2400 3800 1.6

    [0245] This highly disperse PE (M.sub.n=20 kDa) represents the typical range used for flexible packaging applications. Accordingly, L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2-catalyzed hydrogenolysis of a post-consumer LDPE grocery bag (M.sub.n=10.6 kDa, M.sub.w=150 kDa; dried under vacuum; FIG. 89) resulted in equivalent reactivity (FIG. 19D; 2.30.4 mol H.sub.2.Math.Zr g.sup.1.Math.h.sup.1). The catalytic activity was also similar for hexatriacontane (n-C.sub.36H.sub.74), LDPE (M.sub.n=2.8 kDa, M.sub.w=5.3 kDa; FIG. 90), and ultra-high molecular weight high density polyethylene (UHMW HDPE, M.sub.w 3,000-5,000 kDa). These results suggest that rates of threading of chains into pores and translocation to the active sites at the ends of the pores are not limiting the rates of CC bond cleavage for short and long chains as well as branched and linear polymers, and the distribution is independent of CC bond cleavage rate; however, the conformations of long and short chains likely vary to influence the distributions. Specifically, hydrogenolysis of hexatriacontane provided a distribution of chain end-cleaved hydrocarbons, similar to the process observed for secondary hydrogenolysis of C.sub.18 primary products noted above. On the other hand, UHMW HDPE or post-consumer LDPE gave broad distributions, respectively (FIGS. 91-106, Table 8). In addition, L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 produced a narrower distribution of chain lengths of extractable species compared to the other ZrO.sub.2-based catalysts at a similar PE conversion (39-54%, FIG. 19E).

    TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Composition of Products Obtained From the Hydrogenolysis of Hydrocarbons Catalyzed by L-Zro.sub.2@Msio.sub.2 Under H.sub.2 (0.992 Mpa) at 300 C. For 6 Hours H.sub.2 Mass Activity Reactant Volatiles Liquids Residue consumption mol Polymer g g (%) g (%) g (%) mmol H.sub.2 .Math. g.sub.Zr.sup.1 .Math. h.sup.1 n-C.sub.36H.sub.74 2.994 0.050 2.944 n.a..sup.a 3.5 0.7 2.3 0.5 (1.7%) LDPE 3.003 0.134 1.422 1.447 4.2 0.6 2.7 0.4 M.sub.n = 2.8 kDa (4.5%) (47.4%) (48.3%) M.sub.w = 5.3 kDa LDPE 3.003 0.082 1.257 1.664 3.6 0.5 2.3 0.3 M.sub.n = 20 kDa (2.7%) (42.3%) (55.4%) M.sub.w = 91 kDa Grocery Bag 2.934 0.049 1.205 1.68 3.6 0.6 2.3 0.4 M.sub.n = 10.6 kDa (1.7%) (41.1%) (57.3%) M.sub.w = 150 kDa UHMW PE 3.006 0.086 1.402 1.518 4.1 0.3 2.7 0.1 (2.9%) (46.6%) (50.5%) .sup.anot applicable.

    CONCLUSION

    [0246] Investigations of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 revealed the combined architectural and chemical features which enable an earth abundant, non-reducible metal oxide (Zr, Si, O) to catalyze the selective hydrogenolysis of hydrocarbon polymers. The synthesis of L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 demonstrates, remarkably, that ZrO.sub.x(OH).sub.4-x nanoparticles are stable under the hydrolytic conditions necessary for growth of mesoporous silica and creation of the catalytic architecture with core-localized nanoparticles. Moreover, the coordinatively unsaturated surface sites needed for catalysis are stabilized by covalently embedding the amorphous zirconium nanoparticles in the walls of mesoporous silica. These sites mediate CC bond hydrogenolysis with comparable activity to Pt/C. The quantitative comparison of activity across a series of catalysts is based on H.sub.2 consumption or the relationship between the number of CC bonds that are cleaved and the change in M.sub.n of the entire hydrocarbon population, determined from the detailed characterization of gas, liquid, and solid compositions. This quantitative comparison reveals that the catalytic enhancement observed with L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 is more than simply the combination of small crystalline ZrO.sub.2 with mSiO.sub.2, as shown by the poorer activity of ZrO.sub.2-6/mSiO.sub.2.

    [0247] In addition, L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 provides advantageous selectivity over the other zirconia-based catalysts investigated in this study. Alignment of long chains in the pores (Tennakoon et al., Catalytic Upcycling of High-Density Polyethylene Via a Processive Mechanism, Nat. Catal. 3:893-901 (2020), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), non-dissociative adsorption of polymer onto the walls of silica, and escape of smaller products through the void space between the two mesoporous silica plates may all contribute to higher selectivity. In fact, both L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 and L-Pt@mSiO.sub.2 have sites localized at the ends of mesopores and are both more selective than their non-pore-confined analogues. The mechanisms of zirconia and platinum catalyzed reactions, however, are distinct. Access to such species directly from ZrO.sub.2, rather than by grafting neopentylzirconium onto silica, allows the catalytic architecture to be constructed under aqueous conditions, as well as enabling the catalytic chemistry to be accessed with air-stable precursors. In this sense, hydrogenolysis with L-ZrO.sub.2@mSiO.sub.2 is a previously unrecognized heterogeneous analogue of the SOMC-catalyzed CC cleavage processes.

    [0248] Although preferred embodiments have been depicted and described in detail herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art that various modifications, additions, substitutions, and the like can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention and these are therefore considered to be within the scope of the invention as defined in the claims which follow.