Quasiadiabetic differential scanning calorimeter
09857241 ยท 2018-01-02
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G01N25/20
PHYSICS
International classification
G01K17/08
PHYSICS
G01N25/48
PHYSICS
G01N25/00
PHYSICS
Abstract
A method of operating a differential scanning calorimeter wherein errors in the heat flow rate measurement are reduced by operating the calorimeter in a quasiadiabatic mode and by employing a heat flow rate measurement algorithm that includes the leakage heat flow rate. The temperature of the DSC enclosure is controlled independently of the temperature of the measuring system, which allows the temperature difference between the sample and reference containers and the enclosure to be minimized, thus minimizing leakage heat flow.
Claims
1. A method of measuring a differential heat flow in a differential scanning calorimeter, wherein the differential scanning calorimeter comprises a block of high thermal conductivity material within an enclosure, said block of high thermal conductivity material comprising a sample measuring system and a reference measuring system, said method comprising: measuring a temperature of the enclosure; controlling the temperature of the block of high thermal conductivity material according to a predetermined temperature program; measuring T.sub.0, T, T.sub.0, and T.sub.e, where T.sub.0 is the temperature of the block of high thermal conductivity material, T is the difference between the temperature of the sample measuring system and the temperature of the reference measuring system, T.sub.0 is the difference between the temperature of the block of high thermal conductivity material and the temperature of the sample measuring system, and T.sub.e is the temperature of the enclosure; calculating a temperature of a sample container in the sample measuring system and a temperature of a reference container in the reference measuring system based upon the measured values of T.sub.0, T and T.sub.0; controlling the temperature of the enclosure to follow a weighted average of the calculated temperature of the sample container and the calculated temperature of the reference container to minimize heat leakage between the sample and reference measuring systems and the enclosure; and calculating a differential heat flow to the sample container with respect to a heat flow to the reference container based upon measuring T, T.sub.0, T.sub.a and T.sub.e by using an algorithm that comprises corrections to the measured heat flow to the sample container based in part upon the difference between the temperature of the enclosure and the temperature of the sample container.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of calculating a differential heat flow to the sample container with respect to the reference container comprises using one of the following equation and any other algebraically equivalent equations to the following equation:
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising calibrating the differential scanning calorimeter by conducting a first constant heating rate experiment with empty containers and a second constant heating rate experiment at the same constant heating rate as in the first experiment with a sample of known heat capacity in the sample container and a similar sample of known thermal conductivity in the reference container.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the differential scanning calorimeter comprises a base structure comprising a first flange and a second flange, further comprising thermal resistors in the form of slender cylindrical rods joining the first flange to the second flange.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the weighted average uses a weighting factor which is greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to 1.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the weighted average of the calculated temperature of the sample container and the calculated temperature of the reference container is a straight average.
7. A method of measuring heat flow in a differential scanning calorimeter having a measuring system comprising a sample container and a reference container, and an enclosure comprising: controlling a temperature of the measuring system; controlling a temperature of the enclosure independently of the temperature of the measuring system using a set point temperature which is an average of the sample container temperature and the reference container temperature to minimize heat leakage between the sample and reference containers and the enclosure; and performing the step of determining the differential heat flow to a sample container of the differential scanning calorimeter compared to a reference container of the differential scanning calorimeter, wherein the differential scanning calorimeter comprises a first thermocouple attached to the enclosure of the measuring system, a second thermocouple attached to a base structure of the differential scanning calorimeter, a third thermocouple attached to a sample position of the measuring system and a fourth thermocouple attached to a reference position of the measuring system.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the measuring system comprises a sample measuring system and a reference measuring system.
9. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of determining a sample calorimeter thermal resistance, a sample calorimeter heat capacity, a reference calorimeter thermal resistance, and a reference calorimeter heat capacity.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein the base structure comprises a first flange and a second flange, and thermal resistors in the form of slender cylindrical rods joining the first flange to the second flange.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the first flange is in thermal contact with a heating element and the second flange is in thermal contact with a cooling device.
12. A differential scanning calorimeter comprising: a block of high thermal conductivity material comprising a sample measuring system and a reference measuring system; an enclosure encompassing the block of high thermal conductivity material, the sample measuring system and the reference measuring system; a first thermocouple attached to the enclosure for measuring a temperature of the enclosure T.sub.e; a second thermocouple attached to the block of high thermal conductivity material for measuring a temperature of the block of high thermal conductivity material T.sub.0; a third thermocouple attached to the sample measuring system; a fourth thermocouple attached to the reference measuring system, wherein said second, third and fourth thermocouples are configured to measure T.sub.0 and T, where T is the difference between the temperature of the sample measuring system and the temperature of the reference measuring system, and where T.sub.0 is the difference between the temperature of the sample measuring system and the temperature of the block of high thermal conductivity material; a computer system comprising a module for controlling the temperature of the enclosure, a module for controlling the temperature of the block of high thermal conductivity material, a module for calculating a thermal resistance of the sample measuring system, a heat capacity of the sample measuring system, a thermal resistance of the reference measuring system, a heat capacity of the reference measuring system; the computer system receiving inputs from the first, second, third and fourth thermocouples representative of T.sub.0, T, T.sub.0, and T.sub.e, where T.sub.0 is the temperature of the block of high thermal conductivity material, T is the difference between the temperature of the sample measuring system and the temperature of the reference measuring system, T.sub.0 is the difference between the temperature of the block of high thermal conductivity material and the temperature of the sample measuring system, and T.sub.e is the temperature of the enclosure; wherein the computer system is programmed to calculate a temperature of a sample container in the sample measuring system and a temperature of a reference container in the reference measuring system based upon the measured values of T.sub.0, T and T.sub.0; wherein the computer system is programmed to control the temperature of the enclosure to follow a weighted average of the calculated temperature of the sample container and the calculated temperature of the reference container to minimize heat leakage between the sample and reference measuring systems and the enclosure; and wherein the computer system is programmed to calculate a differential heat flow to the sample container with respect to a heat flow to the reference container based upon measuring T, T.sub.0, T.sub.s, and T.sub.e by using an algorithm that comprises corrections to the measured heat flow to the sample container based in part upon the difference between the temperature of the enclosure and the temperature of the sample container.
13. The differential scanning calorimeter of claim 12, wherein the computer system calculates a differential heat flow to the sample container with respect to the reference container comprises using one of the following equation and any other algebraically equivalent equations to the following equation:
14. The differential scanning calorimeter of claim 12, wherein the differential scanning calorimeter comprises a base structure comprising a first flange and a second flange, further comprising thermal resistors in the form of slender cylindrical rods joining the first flange to the second flange.
15. The differential scanning calorimeter of claim 12, wherein the enclosure is a closed-end hollow cylinder with an integral flange that is in thermal contact with a heating/cooling assembly.
16. The differential scanning calorimeter of claim 12, wherein the block of high thermal conductivity material is a block of one of silver, gold, aluminum and copper.
17. A quasiadiabatic differential scanning calorimeter having an enclosure and a DSC sensor comprising: means for independently measuring the temperature of the enclosure and the temperature of the DSC sensor; means for controlling a temperature of the enclosure to supress heat flow leakage between the DSC sensor and the enclosure leaving only a residual heat flow leakage; and a heat flow measurement algorithm that accounts for the residual heat flow leakage between the DSC sensor and the enclosure to determine the heat flow balance within the calorimeter, wherein said algorithm includes terms representative of the temperature of the enclosure and the temperature of the DSC sensor.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The embodiments can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the embodiments. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
(7) For clarity, the detailed descriptions herein describe certain exemplary embodiments, but the disclosure herein may be applied to any differential scanning calorimeter comprising certain of the features described herein and recited in the claims.
(8)
(9) Assuming that both T.sub.n and T.sub.e heat at constant rate b, but that their temperatures differ by a fixed offset and that no transitions or reactions occur in the sample, once steady state is achieved, all other temperatures also heat at the rate b. This condition corresponds to what is commonly referred to as the heat flow baseline and is the portion of the DSC result that may be used to evaluate the sample heat capacity. Solutions for the temperatures are substituted into the heat flow measurement equations of the '406 patent set forth above to give the measured result equation:
(10)
(11) This is not a measurement equation because it does not include the measured variables; rather it is a result equation that shows what the measurement actually includes. The first term is proportional to the difference between the sensor base temperature and the enclosure temperature. It is the difference between the heat that flows through each of the two measuring systems between T.sub.0 and T.sub.e. The second term represents the difference between the heat stored in the sample and its container and the heat stored in the reference container. The third term includes the difference in heat storage between the sample and reference measuring system. Of these three terms, only the second includes the sample heat capacity.
(12) In the absence of heat leakage, the leakage thermal resistances R.sub.se and R.sub.re would be essentially infinite. Consequently, the denominators of the first and third terms would become essentially infinite, making those two terms zero. The resistance ratios in the second term would become one and the resulting measured heat flow rate would be:
q.sub.m=b(C.sub.ss+C.sub.amC.sub.rr).
(13) This is the exact result when the sample and reference containers have the same mass, i.e., C.sub.ss=C.sub.rr. This result shows that heat flow rate measurement errors, at least when measuring heat capacity, are the direct result of heat leakage because if the leakage existed, the measured heat flow rate would not correspond to that required by the sample heat capacity.
(14) If the sample and reference calorimeters are perfectly symmetrical. i.e., the thermal resistances and heat capacities in the sample and reference calorimeters match exactly, the first and third terms are zero and the result of the measurement is:
(15)
(16) The correct or true heat flow rate is:
q.sub.t=bC.sub.sm
(17) The calibration factor is the ratio of the true to the measured heat flow rates. In the case of the perfectly symmetrical DSC it is:
(18)
The calibration factor is independent of the sample heat capacity and the measured heat flow rate.
(19) However, calorimeters are generally not perfectly symmetrical. In those cases, the first and third terms are not zero. Moreover, they do not include the measured heat flow are and are not proportional to the true heat flow, making the calibration factor dependent on the sample heat capacity, which might introduce errors. To show this, the equation for the measured heat flow can be simplified. The first and third terms are assumed to be constant because they include only instrument coefficients, the heating rate b and the temperature difference T.sub.0T.sub.s. Assume that the sample and reference container heat capacities are equal and that the resistance ratios in the second term are equal. The measured result equation becomes:
q.sub.m=L+Mq.sub.t+N
where
(20)
(21) Assume that in a first experiment, the true heat flow is q.sub.t and in a second experiment, the true heat flow is q.sub.t/2. The calibration factors for the two experiments become:
(22)
(23) The two correction factors are different; if we perform a heat flow calibration experiment for a given sample heat capacity, it will only be correct for another sample that has the same heat capacity. This is the direct result of heat flow leakage because, as shown above, if the leakage did not exist, the heat flow measurement would only include the second term and heat flow calibration would not depend on the sample heat flow rate.
(24)
(25)
(26) This heat flow rate equation includes a leakage term added to each of the measured sample and reference heat flow rates. These terms are the heat that is exchanged between the sample container and the enclosure and between the reference container and the enclosure. It differs from the equations of the '365, '497 and '595 patents in that the factors multiplying q.sub.s and q.sub.r do not appear and the temperature differences in the numerators of the leakage terms are T.sub.eT.sub.ss and T.sub.eT.sub.rr.
(27) In operation, the temperature T.sub.0 shown in the thermal network of
(28) Depending upon the temperature of the enclosure T.sub.e relative to the container temperatures, heat may flow into or out of the container through the leakage resistance. When T.sub.e is lower than the container temperature, heat flows from the container to T.sub.e. This heat loss from the container must be made up by heat flowing to the container through the calorimeter, thus making the measured heat flow too large. Conversely, when T.sub.e is higher than the container temperature, heat flows into the container through the leakage resistance reducing the heat flow to the container through the calorimeter, making the measured heat flow lower than the actual heat flow to the container. If the sample and reference calorimeters, containers and samples were perfectly symmetrical, the errors in the measured heat flows in both the sample and reference calorimeters would be equal and would cancel. It can be seen that the above heat flow measurement equation corrects this situation by either adding the leakage heat flow to or subtracting the leakage heat flow from the measured heat flow to each container depending on whether T.sub.e is below or above the container temperature. To implement this measurement method requires that the temperature of the enclosure T.sub.e be measured and that the values for leakage thermal resistances be known.
(29) To apply this heat flow measurement method, the calorimeter thermal resistances and heat capacities must be determined by a calibration method. This calibration method uses two identical constant heating rate experiments but uses empty containers in one experiment, and uses containers of the same type with samples of known heat capacity in the second experiment. Examples of materials that may be used as samples in the second experiment include sapphire samples having a mass of about 65 mg. Typically the same material is used for both samples in the second experiment, with masses that match within a few mg. Other materials may be used in the second experiment, as long as they do not have any transitions in the temperature range of interest, and have a heat capacity that is known with sufficient precision. The reason for including containers in these calibration experiments is that the leakage resistances are dependent on whether and what type of containers are present. With this configuration, the same leakage resistances are present in both calibration experiments.
(30) The calorimeter thermal resistances and heat capacities R.sub.s, R.sub.r, C.sub.s, C.sub.r are determined as follows. First, heat balance equations are written for temperature nodes T.sub.s, T.sub.ss, T.sub.r and T.sub.rr of the thermal model in
(31) The measured quantities are: T, T.sub.0, T.sub.s and T.sub.e. The known quantities are the heat capacities of the containers and the samples, the thermal contact resistances between the containers and calorimeters and the leakage thermal resistances. The resulting equations are:
(32)
(33) The subscripts 1 and 2 indicate the first and second of the calibration experiments. Heat capacities C.sub.ss and C.sub.rr are the heat capacities of the empty containers in the first experiment and the sum of the heat capacities of the container plus the sample for the experiment with samples in the second experiment. If, during the calibration experiments. T.sub.e=T.sub.s, the calibration equations may be simplified. As shown below, the structure of the DSC allows the DSC to be operated in that manner, simplifying the equations. The sample calorimeter thermal resistance R.sub.s, the sample calorimeter heat capacity C.sub.s, the reference calorimeter thermal resistance R.sub.r, and the reference calorimeter heat capacity C.sub.r are given by the following expressions:
(34)
(35)
(36) In this exemplary embodiment, the measurement heating assembly 6 comprises a base structure 7, manufactured from a high thermal conductivity material such as silver, gold, copper or aluminum in the form of a hollow cylinder with one end closed. Platinum alloys or ceramic materials could be used for high temperature measurements. The heat flow sensor may be attached to the closed end of the base structure and a heating element 8 may be wound on the outer cylindrical surface 9 of the base structure. The open end of the base structure may comprise a flange 10 to which may be joined a number of thermal resistors 11 in the form of slender cylindrical rods. The opposite ends of the rods are joined to a cooling flange 12 in the form a flat circular disk with a hole through the center. This overall structure provides means for heating and cooling and for regulation of the temperature of the DSC sensor.
(37) The DSC sensor may be enclosed by the dosed-end hollow cylinder 13 that forms the calorimeter enclosure and is essentially uniform in temperature. It is constructed of high thermal conductivity material, for example silver, to maximize its temperature uniformity. It is heated via a relatively thick flange 14 that is integral to the enclosure and is positioned close to the junction of the cylindrical wall and the flat bottom of the cylinder that forms the top of the enclosure. The location of the flange may be chosen to make the maximum temperature differences along the cylindrical wall and across the flat top of the enclosure very nearly the same, thereby minimizing the temperature variation within the enclosure and approaching the isothermal condition as closely as possible.
(38) In the exemplary embodiment shown in
(39) In the exemplary embodiment shown in
(40) In the exemplary embodiment of
(41) Output signals from the measuring assembly, q.sub.s, q.sub.r, T.sub.ss, T.sub.rr and T.sub.e are used to calculate the sample heat flow using the equation:
(42)
(43) Although in principle the measurement can be made as written, the numerators of the leakage terms involve temperature differences that will be quite small, much less than 1 C. for quasiadiabatic operation. Taking the differences between the values of T.sub.e, T.sub.ss and T.sub.rr to get those temperature differences can introduce significant uncertainty because the temperature differences are taken between large numbers, on the order of hundreds of degrees, to find temperature differences of the order of a few hundredths or thousandths of a degree. This would require that the temperatures T.sub.e, T.sub.ss and T.sub.rr be measured to a very high precision, which is impractical. This can be avoided by substituting the equations given above for T.sub.ss and T.sub.rr. The resulting equation for heat flow rate is:
(44)
(45) Algebraic equivalents to the above equation, i.e., equations for q that give the same result but may use somewhat different formulations for the factors in the equation, may be used instead of the above equation. For example, the equation could replace T.sub.eT.sub.s+T with T.sub.eT.sub.r, since T=T.sub.sT.sub.r. Other possible expressions could also be used in the equation for heat flow rate, such as T.sub.eT.sub.rT or T.sub.eT.sub.0T.sub.0. Additional expressions for calculating temperatures and temperature differences are disclosed in the '747 patent. Heat flow rate equations that use any variation of the above equation to calculate the heat flow rate and provide the same result are algebraically equivalent to the equation set forth above.
(46) Calculating q thus requires measurement, for example, of the temperature difference T.sub.eT.sub.s which may be done as indicated in the temperature measurement schematic of
(47) As shown in
(48) While T.sub.s and T.sub.r may be measured directly between the positive conductors connected to their respective junctions and the negative conductor connected to the T.sub.0 thermocouple junction, in practice they may be obtained by summing the voltages corresponding to T.sub.0, T.sub.0 and T according to the definitions of the temperature differences T.sub.0 and T. Thus T.sub.s=T.sub.0T.sub.0 and T.sub.r=T.sub.sT which is equivalent to measuring the temperatures directly.
(49) Thermocouple junction T.sub.e may be attached to the removable cover comprising the DSC enclosure. Its negative conductor is connected to the negative conductor of the T.sub.0 thermocouple allowing the temperature difference T.sub.eT.sub.s to be measured between the positive conductors of the T.sub.e and T.sub.s thermocouples. This method of connecting the four thermocouples allows the temperature differences T, T and T.sub.eT.sub.s to be measured with high precision as required by the heat flow rate measurement while making all temperatures available.
(50)
(51) The DSC sensor base temperature T.sub.0 is subtracted from the set point temperature to create the temperature error signal which is input to the temperature controller. The temperature controller may employ any of a number of well-known control algorithms, for example the well-known proportional plus integral plus derivative algorithm, that operate on the error signal to generate a power command that is input to the heater power supply that supplies the desired electrical current to the heating element of the measuring assembly.
(52) Output signals from the measuring assembly are T.sub.0, T.sub.0 and T, where T.sub.0 is the temperature at the base of the DSC sensor that is used to control the measurement assembly temperature, i.e., it is the temperature of the block of high thermal conductivity material. In operation T.sub.0 is controlled to follow the desired temperature program. T.sub.0 is T.sub.0T.sub.s and T is T.sub.sT.sub.r. Sample calorimeter temperature T.sub.s is obtained by subtracting T.sub.0 from T.sub.0 Measured sample heat flow rate q.sub.s is obtained from T.sub.0 and T.sub.s using the sample heat flow rate measurement equation, while measured reference heat flow rate q, is obtained from T.sub.0, T and T.sub.s using the reference heat flow rate measurement equation.
(53) The input for the enclosure temperature control system is the difference between the enclosure temperature T.sub.e and a weighted sum of the sample and reference container temperatures T.sub.ss and T.sub.rr, i.e., T.sub.e(KT.sub.ss+(1K)T.sub.rr). Sample container temperature T.sub.ss is multiplied by weighting factor K and reference container temperature T.sub.rr is multiplied by weighting factor 1K where, 0K1. When K=0.5, the input is the difference between the enclosure temperature and the straight average of the sample and reference container temperatures; this input is used during heat flow rate measurement. Other values of the weighting factor K may be used if it is advantageous to do so. Because container temperatures are not measured, T.sub.e(KT.sub.ss+(1K)T.sub.rr) must be calculated by combining the available inputs. Substituting the equations given above for T.sub.ss and T.sub.rr into the control input equation and collecting terms gives: T.sub.eT.sub.s+Kq.sub.sR.sub.ss+(1K)q.sub.rR.sub.rr(1K)T which is the input to the temperature controller. During calibration of the DSC, the instrument uses the temperature difference T.sub.eT.sub.s directly as the input to the temperature controller for the enclosure temperature controller.
(54) The temperature controller may employ any of a number of well-known algorithms, for example proportional plus integral plus derivative, that operate on the error signal to generate a power command that is fed to the heater power supply that supplies the desired electrical current to the heating element of the enclosure assembly. This control system, when used with the embodiment of the DSC structure described in
(55)
(56) In the embodiment shown in
(57) Thermocouple Lookup 231 is a program resident in embedded microprocessor 230 that converts the digital signal representing the output signal of the T.sub.0 thermocouple to a temperature. The temperature at the terminals of the T.sub.0 thermocouple is measured by a thermistor and that temperature is converted to the equivalent voltage of the thermocouple at that temperature. The equivalent thermocouple voltage is summed with the output of the T.sub.0 thermocouple. The resultant reference junction compensated voltage is converted to temperature by using a thermocouple lookup table that is based on NIST monograph 175. Digital signals representing temperature difference measurements T, T.sub.0 and T.sub.eT.sub.s are converted to temperature units by applying the Seebeck coefficients to the signals representing the voltage at the terminals of the respective temperature differences. Reference junction compensation is not needed when measuring temperature differences. In this embodiment, the Seebeck coefficients are based on NIST monograph 175.
(58) Sensor Coefficients 232 is a program resident in embedded microprocessor 230 that supplies sensor coefficients R.sub.s, R.sub.r, C.sub.s, C.sub.r used in the heat flow calculation. The temperature of the DSC cell as indicated by the T.sub.0 thermocouple is used to determine the appropriate value for each of the coefficients. Sensor coefficients are determined using the calibration procedures disclosed herein and saved in the module in tabular form. The program supplies the sensor coefficients to heat flow calculation program 234.
(59) Contact Resistance Model 233 is a program resident in embedded microprocessor 230 that calculates the pan contact resistance using the thermal contact resistance model equation disclosed in the '747 patent.
(60) Heat flow calculator 234 is a program resident in embedded microprocessor 230 that calculates heat flow rates using the methods disclosed herein. Sensor coefficients required by the program are supplied by sensor coefficient program 232 and contact resistances needed by the program are supplied by contact thermal resistance model program 233.
(61) Temperature control 235 is a program resident in embedded microprocessor 230 that determines the power to be supplied to the measurement assembly heater and the power to be supplied to the enclosure assembly heater as shown in
(62) Data storage 236 is nonvolatile storage within the module that stores the data file of the experiment.
(63) In an embodiment, embedded microprocessor 230 is in communication over, e.g., an Ethernet network 30, with computer 300 which comprises instrument control interface module 302, data analysis module 303 and data storage module 304.
(64) Instrument Control Interface 302 is a program resident in computer 300 that provides the user interface to module 200. It is used to program the thermal method for the experiment, to select any options and to control the instrument, e.g., start and stop experiments, select purge gas flow rates, select instrument mode (for example MDSC or standard DSC), and supply information to autosamplers if applicable.
(65) Data Analysis 303 is a program resident in computer 300 that is used to display and process the results of the experiment. The user may select the signals to be displayed and display options such as axis scaling and selection of the abscissa. Analysis of the results may also be performed, such as integration of the area of a peak to determine the enthalpy of a transition.
(66) Data Storage 304 is nonvolatile storage of the data file and the experimental results, e.g., a hard-disk drive or a non-volatile solid-state memory.
(67) While various embodiments have been described above, the description is intended to be exemplary, rather than limiting. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that additional embodiments and implementations are possible. Accordingly, the embodiments are not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.