Device and method for testing a concentrated photovoltaic module

Abstract

The disclosure relates to a device and method for testing a concentrated photovoltaic module comprising a plurality of sub-modules, which comprises: light sources; and parabolic mirrors coupled with the light sources so as to reflect the light from each source in quasi-collimated light beams toward the module to be tested, perpendicular to the module. Each light source comprises: an optical system comprising two parallel lenses on either side of a diaphragm; a lamp on an optical axis of the optical system; a reflector arranged on the axis, on the side opposite the optical system relative to the lamp, and translatably movable along the axis; and a housing containing the optical system, the lamp and the reflector and including an outlet opening for the light beam on the axis.

Claims

1. A device for testing a concentrated photovoltaic module comprising a plurality of sub-modules, each sub-module comprising a plurality of assemblies of a photovoltaic cell and a concentrator arranged relative to the cell for concentrating radiation arriving at normal incidence toward the cell, the test device comprising: a plurality of light sources, a plurality of parabolic mirrors coupled to the light sources so as to send the light coming from each source in a plurality of almost collimated light beams back toward the module to be tested, in a direction perpendicular to the surface of the module, wherein each light source comprises: an optical system having an optical axis and comprising two parallel lenses arranged on either side of a diaphragm, a lamp arranged on the optical axis, a reflector arranged on the optical axis, to the side opposite the optical system relative to the lamp, the reflector being movable in translation along the optical axis, so as to adjust the light intensity delivered by the source by having the distance between the reflector and the lamp vary, a casing containing the optical system, the lamp and the reflector and comprising an output orifice of the light beam, the orifice being arranged on the optical axis of the optical system.

2. The device according to claim 1, wherein the lamp is a flash lamp.

3. The device according to claim 2, wherein the reflector is a parabolic mirror.

4. The device according to claim 3, wherein the test device comprises as many parabolic mirrors as light sources, each light source being arranged at the focal point of the corresponding parabolic mirror.

5. The device according to claim 4, further comprising a support for the module to be tested, wherein the light sources are arranged in two rows extending horizontally on either side of the placement of the module on the support.

6. The device according to claim 5, wherein the parabolic mirrors are arranged so as to form two horizontal rows facing the placement of the module to be tested on the support.

7. A method for testing a concentrated photovoltaic module comprising a plurality of sub-modules, each sub-module comprising a plurality of assemblies of a photovoltaic cell and a concentrator arranged relative to the cell for concentrating radiation arriving at normal incidence toward the cell, wherein a plurality of almost collimated light beams is sent toward the module in a direction perpendicular to the surface of the module from a plurality of light sources coupled to parabolic mirrors, each light source comprising: an optical system having an optical axis and comprising two parallel lenses arranged on either side of a diaphragm, a lamp arranged on the optical axis, a reflector arranged on the optical axis, to the side opposite the optical system relative to the lamp, the reflector being movable in translation along the optical axis, a casing containing the optical system, the lamp and the reflector and comprising an output orifice of the light beam, the orifice being arranged on the optical axis of the optical system, wherein the light intensity delivered by all of the specific light sources is previously made uniform by adjusting the distance between the reflector and the lamp for each light source.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein as many light sources and parabolic mirrors as sub-modules of the photovoltaic module to be tested are used, each light source being coupled to a parabolic mirror so as to send an almost collimated light beam toward a corresponding sub-module.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the light sources and the parabolic mirrors are arranged such that areas not illuminated by the almost collimated beams sent by the mirrors coincide with the areas separating the sub-modules from the module to be tested.

10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the surface of the module to be tested is greater than or equal to 3 m.sup.2.

11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the cells of the module are multi-junction cells.

12. The method according to claim 7, wherein the surface of the module to be tested is greater than or equal to 3 m.sup.2.

13. The method according to claim 7, wherein the cells of the module are multi-junction cells.

14. The device according to claim 1, wherein the reflector is a parabolic mirror.

15. The device according to claim 1, wherein the test device comprises as many parabolic mirrors as light sources, each light source being arranged at the focal point of the corresponding parabolic mirror.

16. The device according to claim 1, further comprising a support for the module to be tested, wherein the light sources are arranged in two rows extending horizontally on either side of the placement of the module on the support.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) Other characteristics and advantages of the disclosure will emerge from the following detailed description in reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

(2) FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram of a concentrated photovoltaic module comprising several sub-modules connected in series;

(3) FIG. 1B is a schematic diagram of a photovoltaic cell-concentrator assembly belonging to a sub-module of such a module;

(4) FIG. 2 is an assembly view of a test device according to the disclosure, and

(5) FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a light source of a test device according to the disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(6) FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram of a photovoltaic module that the disclosure tests.

(7) Module 1 to be tested comprises a plurality of concentrated photovoltaic sub-modules 10.

(8) Each sub-module 10 comprises a plurality of cell-concentrator assemblies.

(9) As illustrated in FIG. 1B, each assembly 100 essentially comprises a photovoltaic cell 101 (for example, multi-junction) and a concentrator 102 designed to concentrate the solar radiation arriving in normal incidence toward the cell 101. Optionally, the cell 101 is placed on a heat dissipater 103 to limit its rise in temperature.

(10) The concentrator 102 comprises, for example, a Fresnel lens.

(11) In the present disclosure, the surface of the module to be tested is the surface of the concentrators.

(12) The sub-modules 10 forming the module 1 can optionally be electrically connected in series or in parallel.

(13) The surface of each sub-module 10 has a generally rectangular shape, whereof the width and height are respectively in the following ranges: between 30 cm and 80 cm in width, for example, 60 cm, and between 60 cm and 150 cm in height, for example, 120 cm.

(14) The sub-modules 10 are typically arranged in the form of rows and/or columns to form the module.

(15) For example, a module of 8 m.sup.2 can be formed from two rows of six sub-modules, each sub-module having a surface of around 0.7 m.sup.2.

(16) FIG. 2 is an assembly view of a test device according to the disclosure.

(17) The device comprises a support 3 for the module 1 to be tested.

(18) Preferably, the support 3 is arranged such that the surface of the module 1 to be tested is vertical.

(19) Vertical in the present disclosure means a direction perpendicular to the floor of the building in which the test device is installed.

(20) In front of the support 3, the test device comprises a plurality of light sources 2 and a plurality of parabolic mirrors 4 coupled to the light sources so as to reflect the light originating from each source in an almost collimated light beam in a direction perpendicular to the surface of the module.

(21) According to a preferred embodiment, each source is arranged at the focal point of the corresponding parabolic mirror.

(22) In this case, the test device, therefore, comprises as many sources as mirrors.

(23) This utilizes a plurality of identical mirrors, whereof the position and orientation are adjusted so as to send back toward the module to be tested an almost collimated beam perpendicular to the surface of the module.

(24) According to another embodiment, each light source can be coupled to several mirrors, to the extent where these mirrors are arranged such that their focal points are combined, the source being arranged at the placement of these focal points.

(25) In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, where the module 1 comprises two horizontal rows of six sub-modules 10, the test device comprises twelve light sources 2 placed according to two horizontal rows on either side of the module 1, and twelve parabolic mirrors 4 placed according to two horizontal rows facing the module 1.

(26) Each source and the corresponding parabolic mirror are oriented relative to each other, wherein the light beam sent back by the mirror is perpendicular to the surface of the corresponding sub-module.

(27) The distance between the sources and the parabolic mirrors is defined, wherein the almost collimated light beam sent back by each mirror illuminates the entire surface of the corresponding sub-module with the preferred characteristics.

(28) This distance, as well as the surface of the mirrors, therefore, depends on the surface of the sub-modules of the module to be tested.

(29) Without wanting to be limiting, it is considered that a distance of the order of 2 to 6 meters measured at the ground between the parabolic mirrors and the light sources, which determines the majority of the surface at the ground of the test device, is reasonable.

(30) But it is not unreasonable for the number of light sources and parabolic mirrors to be identical to the number of sub-modules of the photovoltaic module to be tested.

(31) In fact, if the surface of each sub-module is sufficiently low, it can eventuate that a light source-parabolic mirror couple illuminates several sub-modules and retains a ground space acceptable to the test device and a mirror size that does not impair its manufacturing cost.

(32) On the other hand, there can be areas at the border between adjacent almost collimated beams in which the intensity fails to satisfy the criteria for uniformity or divergence.

(33) In this case, the light sources and the parabolic mirrors are advantageously arranged so that areas not illuminated by the almost collimated beams sent by the mirrors coincide with the areas separating the sub-modules from the module to be tested, which are not functional in terms of photovoltaic conversion.

(34) For reasons of assemblage of the modules, as is evident from FIG. 1A, there is, in fact, a space between two adjacent sub-modules 10 at which no photovoltaic conversion takes place.

(35) In this way, if any defects in uniformity occur in these areas, these defects have no negative effect on the quality of the test.

(36) To allow this adjustment, the test device is designed such that adjustment of the position and orientation of each mirror is possible.

(37) Clearance is advantageously provided between the mirrors to enable such adjustments.

(38) FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a light source capable of generating a light beam having the required characteristics.

(39) Source 2 comprises an optical system having an optical axis X and comprising two parallel lenses 21, 22 arranged on either side of a diaphragm 23.

(40) A lamp 24 is arranged on the optical axis X; first lens designates the lens 21 closest to the lamp and second lens designates the lens 22 arranged on the other side of the diaphragm 23 (lenses 21 and 22 and diaphragm 23 may be collectively referred to herein as the optical system).

(41) By way of advantage, the lamp 24 is a flash lamp. This lamp is selected for its capacity to produce the preferred light spectrum and irradiance. For example, the lamp 24 is a xenon flash lamp.

(42) The diaphragm 23 is centered on the optical axis X and its function is to select only the central part of the beam coming from the first lens 21, so that each light source lights up only the parabolic mirror to which it is matched.

(43) The light source 2 further comprises a reflector 25 arranged on the optical axis X of the side opposite the optical system 21, 22, 23 relative to the lamp 24 so as to send the light emitted by the lamp in the opposite direction back toward the optical system 21, 22, 23.

(44) Reflector 25 is movable in translation (shown by the double-headed arrow x.sub.1, x.sub.2) along the optical axis X.

(45) The reflector 25 can consist of a cylindrical, spherical or parabolic mirror. In the latter case, the mirror can be an axisymmetric parabolic mirror or a cylindro-parabolic mirror, that is, including a regulated surface, the cross-section of which is a parabola and whereof the generators extend in a plane perpendicular to the plane of the parabola.

(46) For example, the mirror is made of polished aluminium.

(47) The advantages of the mobile reflector in the source are the following: First, the light intensity delivered by the source 2 can be adjusted by having the distance along the axis X between the reflector 25 and the lamp 24 vary. Second, more light than that which would be recoverable with a single lamp is collected. Finally, it homogenizes light emitted by the lamp to limit sensitivity to the geometry of the lamp and to positioning errors during lamp changes.

(48) The assembly of the optical system 21, 22, 23 of the lamp 24 and of the reflector 25 is contained in a casing 26.

(49) The casing 26 comprises an orifice 27 arranged on the optical axis X such that the different sources do not disturb each other, one source emitting light on a single mirror only.

(50) The orifice 27 has a size, which can be typically between 1 mm and 7 cm, preferably between 1 cm and 5 cm, as a function of the distance between the source and the parabolic mirror.

(51) Advantageously, the size of the orifice 27 is selected so as to obtain, by reflection on a parabolic mirror, an almost collimated beam having a divergence that is substantially equal to that of the sun (0.25) on a surface corresponding to that of each sub-module of the module to be tested.

(52) For example, for a distance between the parabolic mirror and the source of 2.5 m, an orifice in the form of a disc of 3.5 cm in diameter produces an almost collimated beam having the preferred divergence.

(53) In this way, the assembly formed by the lamp 24, the reflector 25 and the optical system 21, 22, 23 and emitting a light beam via the orifice 27 of the casing 26 forms a light source having the required characteristics for conducting the test of each sub-module.

(54) The person skilled in the art is able to size the different components of the source so that it has the required characteristics.

(55) With each light source being arranged at the focal pointor in the vicinity of the focal pointof a respective parabolic mirror, each mirror reflects light emitted by the corresponding source in the form of an almost collimated beam.

(56) The orientation of the parabolic mirrors is defined so that each almost collimated beam is perpendicular to the surface of the module to be tested.

(57) To ensure that the intensity of all the almost collimated beams is uniform (that is there is a difference between the strongest intensity and the weakest intensity of all the beams that is less than 5%), the intensity emitted by the source for each light source is previously adjusted.

(58) This adjustment is done by controlling the distance between each lamp 24 and the corresponding reflector 25.

(59) The intensity of each source is measured by means of a calibrated sensor provided for this purpose.

(60) For example, a target intensity is defined and it is ensured that the intensity of each beam is contained in a range of intensity of 5% around the target intensity.

(61) The module is installed on the support to perform a test on a photovoltaic module and the necessary electrical connections are made to record its response to lighting simulating the sun.

(62) The position and orientation of the mirrors are adjusted if needed to light up the entire surface of each sub-module.

(63) It is further verified that the assembly of light sources exhibits the required uniformity of intensity.

(64) With each measurement of a sub-module, this verification is done automatically by the intensity-measuring sensor mentioned earlier.

(65) This verification is not necessarily done before each test on a new module.

(66) In fact, once the uniformity of the intensity was regulated for a given assembly of sources (for example, when the test device is commissioned, and/or after replacement of a light source or a component of such a source), it can be considered that this uniformity will not vary over time.

(67) If needed, if this verification reveals a defect in uniformity, the intensity of one or more light sources is adjusted to produce the required uniformity.

(68) Once any necessary adjustments have been made, the lamps of all the sources are simultaneously switched on.

(69) The beam emitted by each light source is sent back by the corresponding parabolic mirror in the form of an almost collimated beam toward the corresponding sub-module, in a direction perpendicular to the surface of the module.

(70) The current-voltage characteristics of each sub-module are recorded; then the results are processed to determine the electric power the module is capable of providing.