INSECT TRAP
20220338459 · 2022-10-27
Inventors
Cpc classification
A01M1/04
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A01M1/145
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A01M1/026
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
A trap for catching or killing insects is disclosed. The trap includes a back housing, an insect capture or killing mechanism, an insect attracting light source, and a cover. The light source is positioned to direct light inwardly directly onto the insect capture or killing mechanism, by the natural configuration of the LEDs or by guides or baffles that channel the insect attracting light in a direction towards the insect capture or killing mechanism, and the light is precluded from being directed immediately outwardly through the cover.
Claims
1. A trap for catching or killing insects comprising: a. a back housing; b. an insect capture or killing mechanism disposed in front of the back housing; c. an insect attracting light source comprising light emitting diodes (LEDs) that emit ultra violet (UV) radiation; and d. a cover, comprising openings allowing insects to enter and through which insect attracting light is dispersed, the cover being disposed in front of the back housing; wherein the insect attracting light source is positioned between the cover and the insect capture or killing mechanism and directs light inwardly directly onto the insect capture or killing mechanism, by the natural configuration of the LEDs or by guides or baffles that channel the insect attracting light in a direction towards the insect capture or killing mechanism, and wherein the light is precluded from being directed immediately outwardly through the cover.
2. The trap as claimed in claim 1, wherein a plane runs parallel to the back housing, the insect capture or killing mechanism, and the cover, and wherein the light is directed immediately inwardly, perpendicular to the plane.
3. The trap as claimed in claim 1, wherein a plane runs parallel to the back housing, the insect capture or killing mechanism, and the cover, and wherein the light is splayed inwardly towards the insect capture or killing mechanism at an angle to a perpendicular of the plane.
4. The trap as claimed in claim 3, wherein the angle is 45 degrees (±5 degrees) to the perpendicular towards the insect capture or killing mechanism.
5. The trap as claimed in claim 3, wherein the light is splayed inwardly, at an angle of approximately 45 degrees to the perpendicular directly onto the insect capture or killing mechanism, with an angle of incidence controlled to a spread of plus 45 degrees to minus 45 degrees relative to the angle of incidence.
6. The trap as claimed in claim 1, wherein the guides or baffles comprise a carrying member and the LEDs are housed in the carrying member.
7. The trap as claimed in claim 1, wherein the UV radiation has a peak wavelength of 360-370nm.
8. The trap as claimed in claim 1, wherein the LEDS are mounted in front of the back housing and the insect capture or killing mechanism and behind the cover on a mount.
9. The trap as claimed in claim 8, wherein the mount is positioned at, or inset from, a perimeter running between the cover and the back housing, and comprises a pair of facing LED carrying members.
10. The trap as claimed in claim 1, wherein the insect capture or killing mechanism comprises a glue board.
11. The trap as claimed in claim 1, further comprising reflectors seated in front of the insect capture or killing mechanism and behind or in front of the insect attracting light source.
12. The trap as claimed in claim 1, wherein the cover is translucent.
13. The trap as claimed in claim 1, which is a smart internet enabled trap.
14. A method of attracting flying insects to an insect trap, comprising: diffusing light emitted by light emitting diodes (LEDs) which emit ultra violet (UV) radiation via a light source, wherein the light source directs light inwardly directly onto an insect capture or killing mechanism, by the natural configuration of the LEDs or by guides or baffles that channel the light in a direction towards the insect capture or killing mechanism, and the light is precluded from being directed immediately outwardly through a cover.
15. The method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the light is directed immediately inwardly, perpendicular to a plane running parallel to a back housing towards the insect capture or killing mechanism.
16. The method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the light is splayed inwardly, at an angle to a perpendicular of a plane running parallel to a back housing, towards the insect capture or killing mechanism.
17. The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the angle is approximately 45 degrees, and the light is splayed inwardly with an angle of incidence controlled to a spread of plus 45 degrees to minus 45 degrees relative to the angle of incidence.
18. The method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the cover is translucent.
19. The method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the UV radiation has a peak wavelength of 360-370nm.
20. The method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the LEDs are mounted in front of a back housing and an insect capture or killing mechanism, and behind a cover on a mount.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0036] The various aspects of the invention will be described further, by way of example, with reference to the following figures in which:
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0043]
[0044] In contrast, and as illustrated in
[0045] Referring to
[0046] This or, for example, a substantially circular configuration orientates the LEDs in facing relationship to direct light to the centre (26) of the trap.
[0047] A further and significant feature in maximising capture efficiency is to shield the LEDs so the light is directed in a plane (X-X) parallel to the back housing (12), as shown in in
[0048] The cover (16) is made of a translucent material and has an innermost surface which is shaped or roughened to maximise the transmission of UV light as set out in EP1457111. The openings (18) which allow insects to enter the trap are shaped to prevent the lights (22) being visible when viewed substantially perpendicularly to the normal plane (X-X) of the back housing (12). The general principle of maintaining a pleasant appearance of a trap is set out in EP0947134.
[0049] The data supporting the claimed invention is set out in the Examples below:
EXAMPLES
[0050] Methodology
[0051] 1. Test Procedure—1 hour Fly Catch tests (Single trap test)
[0052] 1.1 Houseflies were reared using a standard rearing procedure. Three to four day old, mixed sex flies were used in the experiments;
[0053] 1.2 200x flies were used for each replicate;
[0054] 1.3 Before commencing the test, the Fly Test Room was cleaned of any residual flies from previous tests. Walls and floors were moped using a mild detergent in water.
[0055] 1.4 Test Room measures 6 metres (length) by 3 metres (width) by 3 metres (height);
[0056] 1.5 The test room contains 8x 40 Watt Fluorescent tubes evenly spaced and mounted on the ceiling;
[0057] 1.6 Each tube is 4m in length and is a ‘Cool white’ colour;
[0058] 1.7 Ambient UVA and the visible light intensity of the rooms fluorescent light lamps were measured immediately before the release of flies into the room;
[0059] 1.8 Immediately after the commencement of each test ambient UVA and visible light were measured at a fixed point, from the centre of the room. The reading was taken with the sensor face parallel to the ceiling, at a distance of 1.5 metres from the ground;
[0060] 1.9 Temperature was maintained at 25±3° C. and temperature and relative humidity was recorded immediately before the release of any flies into the room;
[0061] 1.10 Traps were placed at 1.8m from the floor to the underside of the trap, centrally on either of the long walls;
[0062] 1.11 Trap UV output was measured by calibrated UVA test equipment on the centre UV face of the trap at a distance of 1 meter from the face.
[0063] 1.12 Two Hundred (200x) mixed sex flies were transferred into the room, at the end farthest from the door, in the corner farthest from the trap. allowed to acclimatize for 30 minutes to the new room environment with the traps switched OFF;
[0064] 1.13 After 30 minutes of acclimatization, the traps were switched ON, environmental parameters recorded, and the traps were allowed to operate. The flies were then released and the numbers of flies trapped was recorded every 30min for a total of 60minutes.
[0065] Results
[0066] The results from sequential tests are set out in the Tables below:
[0067] Test 1 40 LED array (comparing outwardly and inwardly facing LEDs)
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Design Ave Catch (60 min) LED Outwardly 44% LED Inwardly (perpendicular to 93% plane (X-X) onto glue board
[0068] Surprisingly this test suggested that, unlike with fluorescent tubes, it was not desirable to directly transmit the light outwardly, to obtain the most efficient capture.
[0069] Test 2
[0070] 28 LED array with directional testing and testing the effect of the translucent cover.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Design Ave Catch (60 min) LED Inwardly (90 deg- 50% towards/onto glue board) LED Parallel (180 deg) 72% LED Splayed (45 deg inward 80% directly onto the glue board) LED Splayed (45 deg inward) 44% translucent cover blackened
[0071] This test demonstrated that the translucent cover was, like with a traditional fluorescent tube, still playing a significant effect in attracting insects, and that the “internal lighting” of the trap was of significance.
[0072] Test 3
[0073] 30 LED array—Additional effect of directional control, using guides or baffles, to limit the direction of light transmission and further effect of translucent cover.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Design Ave Catch (60 min) LED Parallel (180 deg) plus 83% directional guides precluding light being transmitted directly outwardly LED Parallel (180 deg) plus 40% directional guides but with translucent cover blackened
[0074] The results showed that the use of guides to control the direction of emission maximised catch and that the translucency of the cover was of significance.
[0075] Test 4
[0076] 30 LED array—Comparative study between UV fluorescent trap and UV LED trap of otherwise equivalent design.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Cobra trap (3 × fluorescent tubes) Time post insect Cobra trap (fluorescent) Catch release (minutes) 1 2 3 4 5 (Ave) Replicate 30 46 62 64 50 32 50.8 60 58 86 80 72 58 70.8
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Cobra trap (30 LED (UV) array) Time post insect Cobra trap (LED) Catch release (minutes) 1 2 3 4 5 (Ave) Replicate 30 59 53 53 55 52 54.4 60 88 83 82 84 80 83.4
[0077] The results show a statistically significant improvement in catch rate over 60 minutes (20% improvement).
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 (Statistical analysis on Table 5 data) t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means 60 mins CCT LCT Mean 70.8 83.4 Variance 161.2 8.8 Observations 5 5 Pearson Correlation −0.223025967 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0 df 4 t Stat −2.061422972 P(T <= t) one-tail 0.054138833
[0078] A statistically significant p value of 0.05 confirms the greater capture efficiency of the LED trap over a conventional fluorescent tube trap after 60 minutes of operation.
[0079]
[0080] Finally,