Bathtub fitting standard external space while affording safe egress and larger floor area with enclosed volume

Abstract

A method of making a safe egress bathtub providing safe egress by reducing slide forces extended on a user's feet upon a slippery bathtub floor, wherein the formed bathtub has a limited rectangular footprint, and an optimized floor space is formed with a substantially planar base with a length and width that define the limited rectangular footprint and a front wall, a back wall, a first side wall and a second side wall integral with and extending substantially vertically upwards from the substantially planar base. Each of the front, back, first side wall and second side wall have minimal wall thicknesses to define the optimized floor space and the front wall has a substantially planar inwardly, cantilevered upper apron deck in a substantially parallel relation to the substantially planar base.

Claims

1. A method of manufacturing a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space and with depth perception enhancing contrasting colors; said contrasting colors being markings visually emphasizing a height and depth of an inwardly extending apron deck ledge positioned a predetermined height above a floor of the safe egress bathtub with a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space, said method comprising the steps of: providing a hollow, substantially rectangular safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space with an inwardly, cantilevered substantially horizontal apron deck positioned upon a top of a front wall portion of the safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space; said safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space having substantially vertical front, rear and side walls extending up from a lower floor base a predetermined height; said substantially vertical front, rear and side walls having a cover material provided in a first predetermined color; marking at least a top surface of said apron deck of a second predetermined contrasting color contrasting visually to said first predetermined color; marking said lower floor base with said second predetermined contrasting color contrasting visually to said first predetermined color; whereby said first and said second contrasting colors provide a vivid color differentiation enabling a bather to visually ascertain said predetermined height of said upper inwardly extending apron deck above said lower floor base of the safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space when said bather is mounting into or out of said safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space.

2. The method of making the safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space as in claim 1 wherein a plurality of top edges of said substantially vertically extending walls are also marked with said second predetermined contrasting color contrasting visually to said first predetermined color.

3. The method of making the safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space as in claim 1 wherein said first predetermined color of said substantially vertically extending walls of said safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space is a light color and said second. predetermined contrasting color of said top surface of said inwardly extending apron deck and said lower floor base of said safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space is a contrasting dark color.

4. The method of making the safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space as in claim 1 wherein said first predetermined color of said substantially vertically extending walls of said safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space is a dark color and said second. predetermined contrasting color of said top surface of said inwardly extending apron deck and said lower floor base of said safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space is a contrasting light color.

5. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space as in claim 1, wherein said assembled safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space includes: said substantially vertical back and front walls, first and second end walls, and a bottom floor, all of said walls being of rigid material, wherein further entry and egress of a user being over said front wall; said top substantially horizontal apron deck extending from an outer surface of said front wall toward said back wall, said top horizontal deck having sufficient width to support sliding shower wall tracks thereon; said bottom wall extending to a rear, vertical surface of said front wall with said apron deck extending over said front wall extending down to an area of said bottom wall adjacent said rear, vertical surface of said front wall; and whereby a foot extending from a leg of a user on said bottom wall while said user is egressing said safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space extends adjacent to said rear, vertical surface of said front wall, under said overhanging area so that a straddling angle the leg of the user makes with said front wall is sufficiently small to minimize a horizontal component of force on said foot for reducing an incidence of slippage on a wet bottom and falling.

6. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 5 in which said back wall has a top edge sufficient in thickness to accommodate bottom edges of wall tiles when said back wall abuts or is embedded in a room wall.

7. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 6 in which said top edge thickness of said back wall is about a quarter of an inch.

8. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 5 in which the thickness of said front wall and the closeness of the location of said front wall to the foot of the leg of the user, under said cantilevered top horizontal apron deck, is such as to reduce the horizontal component of force on said foot to less than about 14% of the weight of the user.

9. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 5 in which said top horizontal apron deck has a width of up to a maximum of about 2.5 inches.

10. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 5 in which said front wall in contact with said bottom wall is minimally rounded at the intersection thereof.

11. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 5 in which said front wall has a thickness of about two and one half inches, and said back wall has a thickness of about one inch.

12. The method of making the safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 1, wherein said front wall and said rear wall are tapered, with said top thickness of about one inch and with a bottom thickness of about one and one quarter inch in thickness; and wherein a top surface of said substantially planar apron deck has up to a maximum thickness of two and one half inches, and said apron deck has a slanted undercut portion extending back towards an inside surface of said front wall of said safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space.

13. A method of making the safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space and with depth perception enhancing contrasting colors; said method comprising the steps of: assembling a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space by providing: a two piece mold comprising of a primary mold piece for making the safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space and, a secondary mold piece for making an inwardly, cantilevered, apron deck on a front portion of the safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space; providing said safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space with substantially vertical back and front walls, first and second end walls, and a bottom wall, all of said walls being of rigid material, entry and egress of a user being over said front wall; providing said front wall having a top horizontal apron deck extending from an outer surface of said front wall toward said back wall, said top horizontal deck having sufficient width to support sliding shower wall tracks thereon; said bottom wall extending to a rear, vertical surface of said front wall with said apron deck extending over said front wall extending down to an area of said bottom wall adjacent said rear, vertical surface of said front wall; providing the assembled safe egress bathtub with contrasting colors on selected surfaces of the bathtub, to enhance depth perception of a bather entering or exiting a bathtub with at least a wet floor, or a volume of water therein said contrasting colors being markings visually emphasizing a height and depth of an inwardly extending apron deck ledge positioned a predetermined height above a floor of the safe egress bathtub with a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space.

14. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 13 in which said back wall has a top edge sufficient in thickness to accommodate bottom edges of wall tiles when said back wall abuts or is embedded in a room wall.

15. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 14 in which said top edge thickness of said back wall is about a quarter of an inch.

16. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 14 in which the thickness of said front wall and the closeness of the location of said front wall to the foot of the leg of the user, under said cantilevered top horizontal apron deck, is such as to reduce the horizontal component of force on said foot to less than about 14% of the weight of the user.

17. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 13 in which said top horizontal apron deck has a width of up to a maximum of about 2.5 inches.

18. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 13 in which said front wall in contact with said bottom wall is minimally rounded at the intersection thereof.

19. The method of making a safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 13 in which said front wall has a thickness of about two and one half inches, and said back wall has a thickness of about one inch.

20. The method of making the safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space of claim 13 having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space, wherein said front wall and said rear wall are tapered, with said top thickness of about one inch and having a bottom thickness of about one and one quarter inch in thickness; and wherein a top surface of said substantially planar apron deck has up to a maximum thickness of two and one half inches, and said apron deck has a slanted undercut portion extending back towards an inside surface of said front wall of said safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space.

21. The safe egress bathtub having a limited rectangular footprint and optimized floor space having a cantilevered inwardly extending front apron deck formed by the method of claim 13.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The present invention can best be understood in connection with the accompanying drawings. It is noted that the invention is not limited to the precise embodiments shown in the accompanying drawings, in which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a portion of a bathroom enclosing a prior art bathtub;

(3) FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view of a prior art bathtub with a limited space interior;

(4) FIG. 2 is a perspective detail in partial crossection of a front corner of the prior art tub showing the front deck width;

(5) FIG. 3 is perspective view of a portion of a bathroom enclosing the bathtub of this invention;

(6) FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the bathtub of this invention;

(7) FIG. 5 is an end view crossection showing the profile of the cantilevered front deck;

(8) FIG. 5A is an end view crossection of an alternate embodiment, showing the profile of the cantilevered front deck;

(9) FIG. 6 is an enlarged cross-section detail of the cantilevered front deck;

(10) FIG. 7 is a side cross-section view of the bathtub of this invention;

(11) FIG. 8 is an end view profile of a prior art tub with rounded edges at bottom. An outline of the anchor leg of a person in unsupported egress is shown at a particular instant. Also shown is a vector force diagram at the same instant;

(12) FIG. 9 is an end view profile of the tub of this invention with an outline of the anchor leg of a person in unsupported egress at a comparable instant to that shown in FIG. 8. Also shown is a vector force diagram at the same instant.

(13) FIG. 10 is a top plan view of an alternate embodiment bathtub of this invention with a thicker front panel (without top cantilever) as shown;

(14) FIG. 11 is a side crossection view of the alternate embodiment of FIG. 10;

(15) FIG. 12 is a side exterior elevation view of the alternate embodiment;

(16) FIG. 13 is an end exterior elevation view of the alternate embodiment;

(17) FIG. 14 is an end view profile of the alternate embodiment tub with an outline of the anchor leg of a person in unsupported egress at an instant comparable to that shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, wherein a vector force diagram at the same instant is also shown;

(18) FIG. 15 is a perspective view of the primary mold piece of a two piece mold used to form that bathtub of the present invention with a cantilevered, inwardly extending apron deck with an undercut;

(19) FIG. 16 is a close up view of a top portion of the front wall of the primary mold piece of FIG. 15, showing a mounting ledge with holes for temporarily attaching a secondary mold piece to the primary mold piece, for making the cantilevered, inwardly extending apron deck of the bathtub, and showing in partial cutaway the long edge of the secondary mold piece, showing the holes;

(20) FIG. 17 is an exploded perspective view of the secondary mold piece used to form the cantilevered, inwardly extending apron deck, and wherein the secondary mold piece is shown being installed over the mounting ledge of the primary mold piece for the bathtub;

(21) FIG. 18 is a perspective view of the secondary mold piece for the inward ledge having been installed over the primary mold piece for making the bathtub;

(22) FIG. 19 is a close up perspective detail view of a portion of the secondary mold piece having been installed over the primary mold piece for making the bathtub;

(23) FIG. 20 is a diagrammatic perspective partial crossectional view of a portion of the pourable acrylic material having been poured over a fiberglass sheet laid over a portion of the assembled primary and secondary mold pieces of the two piece mold, used to form the bathtub, with the acrylic material shown sectioned within one portion of one half of the mold, so it can be appreciated how the poured acrylic material conforms to the surfaces of the mold;

(24) FIG. 21 is an inverted side perspective view of the downward release of the assembled acrylic bathtub with the cantilevered, inwardly extending apron deck, down from the inverted primary mold piece, showing the now formed acrylic bathtub being dropping out partially therefrom, and wherein the secondary mold piece is embedded under the newly formed acrylic cantilevered apron deck;

(25) FIG. 22 is an inverted close-up perspective detail view of a portion of the assembled bathtub, having been dropped by gravity from the inverted primary mold piece, with an arrow indicating the lateral sideways pull out directional movement of the removal of the secondary mold piece from beneath the assembled, inwardly cantilevered apron deck portion of the assembled acrylic bathtub; and,

(26) FIG. 23 is a perspective view of an alternate embodiment of the bathtub of this invention; where contrasting colors are provided on selected surfaces of the bathtub, to enhance depth perception of a bather entering or exiting a bathtub with at least a wet floor, or a volume of water therein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(27) As shown in Prior Art drawing FIGS. 1 and 2, the prior art tub 2 in bathroom 1 as shown in FIG. 1 is meant to represent any commonly available design. Front deck 3, back deck 4 and side decks 5 are shown. FIG. 2 is a close-up showing the typical wide dimension 8 of front deck 3 as well as the narrower side decks 5 dimension 7.

(28) FIGS. 3-9 pertain to one embodiment of the bathtub of this invention. The length of the bathtub can be from four to six feet, the height which could be from fourteen to eighteen inches, and the width which could be from thirty to thirty-six inches. FIG. 3 shows tub 15 in bathroom 10 which is of the same dimensions as bathroom 1 in FIG. 1, which is typically five feet wide (60 inches), thirty inches in front to back depth, and about fourteen inches in height. FIG. 4 shows tub 15 in a perspective view with back deck 17 in the forefront and front deck 16 at the far side. It is noted that side decks 18 as well as back deck 17 have wall widths that are equivalent to the thickness or width of the material comprising the side walls, the back wall and the front wall below the front deck. The crossectional views of FIGS. 5, 5A and 6 show the cantilevered shape of front deck 16 in detail, highlighting that the front deck width does not encumber the interior width of the tub floor. It is further noted that the width dimension 19 is the same as dimension 8 in prior art FIG. 2. FIG. 7 is a length wise crossection showing sloping backrest 20 and slight drain slope 21, which is preferred. In these FIGS. 3-9, large sections are shown as being solid material just for interior dimensional clarity, however they may in fact have enclosed air spaces. This would be especially true of the large wedge shape under back rest 20 and the cantilevered front deck as in FIG. 6; it would depend on the material used and method of construction.

(29) An expanded space bathtub 15 fits in standard tub dimensions of bathroom 10 having footprint floor area 10a and vertically extending bathroom wall surfaces 10b, 10c and 10d, and has a larger internal floor area 15e of bottom base wall 15f, and larger air volume 30 within. The bathtub 15 includes thin walls, including four vertically extending walls, including front wall 15a, rear wall 15b, left side wall 15c with sloping backrest 20 adjacent thereto and separated from left side wall 15c by hollow interior area 21a, and right side wall 15d having trip lever hole 23. Vertical walls 15a, 15b, 15c and 15d extend vertically upward from rectangular bottom base wall 15f having an exterior footprint to fit within the pre-determined rectangular bathtub insertion floor footprint area 10a of bathroom 10. Bottom base wall 15f has an interior footprint 15e, which, with the inside surfaces of vertically extending walls 15a, 15b 15c and sloping backrest wall 20 of left side wall 15c, define the enlarged air volume 30 extending therebetween.

(30) The thickness of the vertical walls 15a, 15b, 15c, 15d and sloping side backrest 20 is preferably one inch in thickness near the top, up to about one and one quarter inches on the bottom, to provide a slightly sloped surface for easy removal of the tub from a mold. The one inch and one and one quarter inch dimensions need not be solid, so that a wall (not shown) having a thickness of one quarter inch on each side can have a hollow interior of one half inch. A similar hollow area can be provided at the slightly wider bottom width of one and one quarter inches total, combined with the walls and hollow interior. Moreover, for the rear, wall facing wall 15b, the wall 15b can be just one layer of one quarter inch in thickness, with a three quarter inch hollow area behind the one quarter inch wall, up to the bathroom wall surface 25 itself. The one inch thickness at the top 17 of rear wall 15b is required to accommodate tiles of up to inch in thickness and accompanying grout against the bathroom wall surface 25. As shown in FIG. 5A, an optional attachment flange 24 can be attached to rear wall 15b for attachment to bathroom wall surface 25.

(31) As shown in the crossectional view of FIG. 7, the inside bottom footprint 15e of bottom base wall 15f preferably has a slope 21, sloping downward from the corner 21a defined by sloping backrest 20 and an adjacent edge of interior footprint 15e of bottom base wall 15f, downwards towards water drain hole 22.

(32) In the cantilevered apron deck embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, the front apron deck 16's width of up to a maximum of 3.5 inches is maintained within normal construction requirements to support the sliding glass door tracks, but without the need for limiting interior bathtub volume with thick walls. The cantilevered apron deck 16 can also have a reduced width of about two and one half inches. The side decks 18 and back deck 17 are limited to the thickness of the tub material. In the embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, the front apron deck 16 has a width which is maintained to industry standards to support sliding shower wall tracks thereon, but it is cantilevered from the front surface of front wall 15a inward and then rejoins the thin inner wall of the front wall 15a where its inwardly preferably curved backwards undersurface wall 16a meets near the top of the inner surface of front wall 15a of bathtub 15, thereby not reducing the interior floor space 15e or the interior air volume 30 by the front deck 16's width. The bathtub 15 therefore maximizes internal bathtub/shower stall space within the predetermined confines of typical residential bathroom bathtub and shower space dimensions.

(33) The bathtub 15 of this invention can be made of steel or plastic resin materials and finished as is common in the industry.

(34) A comparison of the interior floor space and enclosed air volume (to the top edge of all four vertical walls the tub) has been made to compare a prior art tub and a tub of FIGS. 3-9 of this invention of the same external dimensions. A prior art front deck of 4 and a back deck of 3 with side decks of 2 in a 60 inch external length by 30 inch tub of 15 average internal depth was assumed for comparison. The wall thickness of the tub of this invention is assumed to be 1. Both tubs have the angled backrest and straight vertical walls. The increased floor area and air volume in the tub of this invention is due to the 1 wall thickness and decks (on 3 edges) vs. the decks of the prior art tub which reduce the internal dimensions.

(35) The results of the comparison are as follows: Interior floor area prior art 1120 sq. in. this tub 1419 sq. in., a 27% increase. Interior air volume prior art 16790 cubic in. this tub 20845 cubic in., a 24% increase

(36) Additionally, the above calculations were based upon a prior art bathtub with a front deck of 4 and a back deck of 3 with side decks of 2 in a 60 inch external length by 30 inch tub of 15 average internal depth for comparison. However, since most prior art tubs have sloping and bottom rounded sides, the numbers of this estimate represent the minimum percentage increases in interior floor area and interior volume. It is estimated that in comparison with other prior art bathtubs, with increased sloping and bottom rounded sides, the savings can be up to approximately 35% increase in interior floor area and interior air volume.

(37) Bathtub 15 of this invention also offers safety improvement over that of the prior art. Safety studies indicate over 234,000 bathroom injuries each year, of which 81 percent occurred because of falls in the bathroom. Of these injuries, more than one third happen while bathing or showing. The Center for Disease Controls (CDC) estimates that 9.8 percent of all bathroom injuries specifically occur when getting out of a bathtub, which equals at least 22,932 injuries.

(38) FIG. 8 shows a profile of a person 42 exiting a prior art bathtub 40 with rounded walls at the bottom. The average person 42 is a composite 50.sup.th percentile man or woman with a hip joint to floor dimension L of 35 inches. Although the results of the analysis to follow are somewhat dependent on this selected number, let it be said that a taller person would experience slightly less difference in egress from either a prior art tub or the tub 15 of FIGS. 3-9 of this invention, and vice versa for a shorter person. Note that the rounded side bottom edge forces the anchor foot farther away from the front edge of the tub (toward the middle) to be supported by the flat portion; this is also true of prior art profile shown in FIG. 1A with the sloping sides.

(39) The instant for the static analysis of FIG. 8 is that corresponding to the hip joint being directly above the front edge of the tub with the ball of the anchor foot carrying the entire weight of the person before the forward foot (not shown) touches the ground. For the purpose of analysis, the anchor leg can be represented by a rigid rod from the hip joint 44 to the ball of the anchor foot. By measuring the angle in FIG. 8, it is found that this rod makes a 17 degree angle with the vertical as shown in the vector force diagram to the right. The weight of person 42, W, is shown vertically. The horizontal component force Fs that arises from this arrangement is 0.306 W or almost 31% of the weight of the person. This horizontal component must be resisted by the frictional force between the ball of the anchor foot and the tub (or a tub mat). Several items affect the local coefficient of friction between foot and tub, or foot and mat and mat to tub. Water, and especially soapy water, is a good lubricant and dramatically reduces the coefficient of friction. If the anchor foot slips, the bather is in trouble!

(40) If a similar analysis of Applicants' expanded space tub 15 is performed as depicted in FIG. 9, the angle of rigid rod and the vertical is only 5.5 degrees because now the anchor foot is so close to the front edge. The horizontal component force Fs that results in this analysis is 0.096 W or only less than 10% of the weight of the person. Thus with the same bather exiting either a prior art tub or a tub 15, slippage can be avoided in a tub 15 of this invention even if the friction coefficient were of that which minimally prevented a spill in a conventional tub. Common sense reinforces the numeric example; the tub 15 side walls are substantially vertical; the bather can have the planted leg being substantially vertical and stable, and this requires only lifting the leading leg up and over the thin apron of 3.5 inches or less.

(41) A non-preferred alternate embodiment tub 50 of this invention is the subject of FIGS. 10-14. This tub is similar to tub 15 of this invention, but uses a front panel of thicker material instead of a top cantilever to provide the top resting surface to receive door tracks (if used).

(42) FIG. 10 is a top view showing a front panel 52 of about 2.5 in thickness. It is noted that the 2.5 thickness can be reduced down from 2.5 in a range of to a top thickness of about one inch. Other dimensions shown in FIGS. 10, 11, 12, and 13 include the length which could be from four to six feet, the height which could be from fourteen to eighteen inches, and the width which could be from thirty to thirty-six inches. The side crossection of FIG. 11 reveals that it is identical in shape to that of FIG. 7 for tub 15.

(43) The side profile of FIG. 14 showing the front panel 52 in crossection more clearly shows the distinction from tub 15 with it's cantilever at the top edge (see FIG. 9). FIG. 14 is an egress analysis of person 42 exiting the alternate embodiment tub 50 as was performed before for the prior art, and for tub 15 of this invention. Again, dimension L of a rod from hip joint 44 to the ball of the foot is 35. In this case however, the rod makes an angle of 7.97 degrees with the vertical as opposed to 17 degrees for the prior art situation or 5.5 degrees for tub 15. In tub 50, person 42's foot is forced slightly back (1.5) from the front surface relative to the position in tub 15 due to the thicker front panel 52. This geometry results in a side force (Fs) of 14% of the person's weight, W. While this is not as safe as the case for tub 15, this is still less than half the side force of the prior art tub (31% of the person's weight) analysis of FIG. 8.

(44) FIGS. 15 to 22 show the method of making the bathtub 15 of FIGS. 1-9, with the inwardly extending apron deck ledge 16, by using a two-piece mold 100, so that after the acrylic material 101 is poured into the primary mold piece 102 and set, then the primary mold piece 102 is inverted and the completed bathtub 15 falls easily out of the primary mold piece 102 having hollow tub-shaped portion 105, shown in FIG. 20. The two piece mold is necessary because of the undercut of the inwardly cantilevered apron deck 16.

(45) For example, the cantilevered slanted inward ledge apron deck 16 has to be made of a separate secondary mold piece 103, which is attached to the bathtub 15 as shown in the drawing FIGS. 17-19. Then the acrylic material 101 is poured over a fiberglass layer laid over the two mold pieces 102, 103 as in FIG. 20 and then the main tub mold piece 102 is inverted as in FIG. 21, so that, upon subsequent completion of the mold making of the bathtub 15, the assembled acrylic bathtub 15 will slide downward out of the primary mold piece 102. The smaller secondary inward ledge mold 103 for the inwardly, cantilevered apron deck 16 is then encased within the portion of the tub 15 being the inwardly extending ledge apron deck 16. FIG. 21 also shows excess acrylic material which is trimmed to form the final bathtub 15.

(46) As shown in drawing FIG. 22, of the completed white acrylic tub 15, which is shown inverted after removal as in FIG. 21, the encased secondary mold piece 103 is slid out laterally, in the direction of the arrow shown, from within and below the actual integrally formed inward ledge cantilevered apron deck portion 16 of the bathtub 15.

(47) It is further noted that FIG. 22 shows the upside down inverted bathtub 15, so that the lower right corner of bathtub 15 in FIG. 22 is actually the upper front apron deck 26, when the completed bathtub 15 is turned right side up.

(48) FIGS. 15 and 16 show that the primary mold piece 102 is an analog mirror image of the walls of the bathtub 15, without the cantilevered apron deck 16. A stepped ledge 102a with cut-out holes 102b is provided for protruding nibs (not shown), to anchor and steady the secondary mold piece 103 in place therein, for positioning of the molding of the cantilevered apron deck 16 with an undercut.

(49) FIGS. 17-19 show the angled secondary mold piece 103 with substantially horizontal top ledge 103a and angled undercut slanted surface 103b, which has a bottom edge, which meets the inside 102c of the front wall 102d of the primary mold piece 102.

(50) FIG. 20 shows the acrylic mold material 101 being poured over the flexible fiberglass sheet covering the assembled two piece mold 102, 103.

(51) FIG. 21 shows the inverted bathtub 15 being dropped out of the primary mold piece 102, while the secondary mold piece 103 (shown in phantom) is captured under the cantilevered apron deck 16, and laterally or otherwise removed as in FIG. 22 in the direction of the arrow.

(52) FIG. 23 shows an alternate embodiment with contrasting color markings on the expanded space bathtub 15, to conform to falls prevention recommendations of the American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA), whereby AOTA recommendations provide that stair treads and other household items have contrasting colors, to enhance the depth perception of persons with or without impaired vision who are walking in a home environment. The bathtub 15 in FIG. 23 includes thin walls, including four vertically extending walls, including front wall 15a, rear wall 15b, left and right side walls 15c, 15d separated by a hollow interior volume area 30. The right side wall 15d has trip lever hole 23 and the bottom base floor footprint area 15e has drain hole 22. Vertical walls 15a, 15b, 15c and 15d extend vertically upward from bottom base wall footprint area 15e. Front wall 15a has cantilevered inwardly extending apron deck ledge 16.

(53) In order to attempt to comply with the AOTA recommendations for increasing depth perception on stair treads, the bathtub 15 of the embodiment shown in FIG. 23 of the present invention, includes contrasting colored areas C represented by the stippling shown in the areas designated as C, such as shown on the apron deck 16 and then lower floor area 15e. Because the apron deck 16 is higher than the bathtub floor area 15e, the colored areas C: are separated by the otherwise contrasting lighter color of the vertically extending walls 15a, 15b, 15c and 15d of bathtub 15. Therefore, while any contrasting colors can be used, in one example, a dark Royal Blue color on the top apron deck 16 will contrast with the lighter walls 15a, 15b, 15c and 15d of bathtub 15, above the darker Royal blue color of the floor 15e. By providing the darker contrasting colors C at the top of the tub to be stepped over by a bather, with the lower floor base 15e of the same contrasting color differentiated by the lighter color of the vertically extending walls 15a, 15b, 15c and 15d, the bather will be able to better estimate the distance of the lighter colored vertical walls above the Royal Blue colored floor 15e and below the Royal Blue colored apron deck 16.

(54) The stippling of FIG. 23 represents any contrasting color which contrasts with the generally lighter vertically extending walls 15a, 15b, 15c and 15d (such as, for example, white, pink, light green or beige colors). If perchance the tub is made of a material of a darker color, such as, for example, Hunter Green, or Black, then the top apron deck 16 and lower floor 15e of bathtub 15 would be colored in a light, contrasting color, instead of a dark, contrasting color.

(55) While FIG. 23 shows the darker contrasting colors on the apron deck 16 and the floor 15e, optionally one or more of the other top surfaces 17 or 18 of the rear wall 15b or side walls 15c and 15d can also be portrayed in the dark or light contrasting color of the apron deck 16 and floor 15e.

(56) It is further noted that the slanted undersurface of the inwardly extending cantilevered apron deck can assume various configurations. For example, the sloping undercut surface of the apron deck can have variable angles, such as, for example, the undersurface 16a descending from a shoulder, at a wide angle. Alternatively, the slanted undersurface can be longer and have less of an inwardly extending angle, such as would be formed by acrylic poured over undercut slanted surface 103b of a secondary mold piece, shown in FIGS. 17-19. Moreover, the slanted undercut surface can be straight, curved or combinations thereof.

(57) In the foregoing description, certain terms and visual depictions are used to illustrate the preferred embodiment. However, no unnecessary limitations are to be construed by the terms used or illustrations depicted, beyond what is shown in the prior art, since the terms and illustrations are exemplary only, and are not meant to limit the scope of the present invention.

(58) It is further known that other modifications may be made to the present invention, without departing the scope of the invention, as noted in the appended Claims.