System and method for creation, deployment and management of augmented attacker map

Abstract

A system for augmenting an attacker map of a network of resources, including a deception management server within a network of resources, generating an attacker map for the network, the attacker map including one or more attack paths traversing some or all of the resources, each attack path corresponding to one or more successive attack vectors, wherein an attack vector is an object in memory or storage of a first resource of the network that may potentially lead an attacker to a second resource of the network, and a deployment module for planting one or more decoy attack vectors in some of all of the resources of the network, wherein the deception management server generates an augmented attacker map by augmenting the attack paths based on the decoy attack vectors added by the deployment module.

Claims

1. A system for augmenting an attacker map of a network of resources, comprising: a deception management server within a network of resources, generating an attacker map for the network, the attacker map depicting a view of the network and comprising one or more lateral attack paths traversing some or all of the resources, each lateral attack path corresponding to one or more successive lateral attack vectors, wherein a lateral attack vector is an object in memory or storage of a first resource of the network that may potentially lead an attacker to a second resource of the network; a deployment module planting one or more decoy lateral attack vectors in some of all of the resources of the network; and an access governor authorizing access to resources in the network, and issuing a notification upon recognizing an attempt to access one or more of the resources of the network via one or more of the decoy lateral attack vectors planted by said deception module, wherein said deception management server further generates an augmented attacker map by augmenting the lateral attack paths based on the decoy lateral attack vectors added by said deployment module.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein said deployment module adds one or more decoy resources to the network, and wherein one or more of the decoy lateral attack vectors are planted in decoy resources or lead to decoy resources.

3. The system of claim 2, wherein the lateral attack vectors and the decoy lateral attack vectors include at least one member of (i) username and password, (ii) username and authentication ticket, (iii) FTP server address, username and password, (iv) database server address, username and password, and (v) SSH server address, username and password.

4. The system of claim 2, wherein said deception management server renders views of the attacker map and the augmented attacker map.

5. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions, which, when executed by a processor of a management computer, cause the computer: to generate an attacker map for a network of resources, the attacker map depicting a view of the network and comprising one or more lateral attack paths traversing some or all of the resources, each lateral attack path corresponding to one or more successive lateral attack vectors, wherein a lateral attack vector is an object in memory or storage of a first resource of the network that may potentially lead an attacker to a second resource of the network; to plant one or more decoy lateral attack vectors in some or all of the resources of the network; and to generate an augmented attacker map by augmenting the lateral attack paths based on the decoy lateral attack vectors; and to issue a notification upon recognizing an attempt to access one or more of the resources of the network via one or more of the decoy attack vectors that were planted.

6. The computer readable medium of claim 5 wherein the instructions further cause the computer to add one or more decoy resources to the network, wherein one or more of the decoy lateral attack vectors are planted in decoy resources or lead to decoy resources.

7. The computer readable medium of claim 6, wherein the lateral attack vectors and the decoy lateral attack vectors include at least one member of (i) username and password, (ii) username and authentication ticket, (iii) FTP server address, username and password, (iv) database server address, username and password, and (v) SSH server address, username and password.

8. The computer readable medium of claim 6, wherein the instructions further cause the computer to render views of the attacker map and the augmented attacker map.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The present invention will be more fully understood and appreciated from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram of a prior art enterprise network connected to an external internet;

(3) FIG. 2 is a simplified diagram of a prior art enterprise network with attack vectors of an attacker at an early stage of lateral movement;

(4) FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram of a prior art enterprise network with attack paths of an attacker at a later stage of lateral movement;

(5) FIG. 4 is a simplified diagram of an enterprise network with network surveillance, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

(6) FIG. 5 is a simplified flowchart of a method for network surveillance and notification using decoy servers, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

(7) FIG. 6 is a simplified method for network surveillance and notification using decoy user credentials, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and

(8) FIG. 7 is a simplified diagram of a method for network surveillance using two-factor deception, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

(9) For reference to the figures, the following index of elements and their numerals is provided. Similarly numbered elements represent elements of the same type, but they need not be identical elements.

(10) TABLE-US-00001 Table of elements in the figures Element Description 10 Internet 100 enterprise network 110 network computers 120 network databases 130 network switches and routers 140 mobile devices 150 access governor (optional) 160 SIEM server 170 DNS server 180 firewall 200 enterprise network with network surveillance 210 deception management server 211 policy manager 212 deployment module 213 forensic application 220 database of credential types 230 policy database 240 decoy servers 241 tar-pit modules 242 forensic alert module 250 update server

(11) Elements numbered in the 1000's are operations of flow charts.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(12) In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, systems and methods are provided for creating, deploying and managing augmentation to an attacker's current attack map. These systems and methods define decoy attack vectors that change the current attack map, and detect the attacker when he follows an attack vector that leads to a decoy network node.

(13) Reference is made to FIG. 4, which is a simplified diagram of an enterprise network 200 with network surveillance, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Network 200 includes a deception management server 210, a database 220 of decoy attack vectors, a policy database 230 and decoy servers 240. In addition, network computers 110 and databases 120 are grouped into groups G1, G2, G3 and G4.

(14) Database 220 stores attack vectors that fake movement and access to computers 110, databases 120 and other resources in network 200. Attack vectors include inter alia: user credentials of the form <username> <password> user credentials of the form <username> <hash of password> user credentials of the form <username> <ticket> FTP server credentials of the form <address> <username> <password> SSH server credentials of the form <address> <username> <password>

(15) The attack vectors stored in database 220 are categorized by families, such as inter alia F1user credentials F2connections F3FTP logins F4SSH logins F5share names F6databases F7network devices F8URLs F9Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) F10recent command F11scanners

(16) Credentials for a computer B that reside on a computer A provide an attack vector for an attacker from computer A.fwdarw.computer B.

(17) Database 220 communicates with an update server 250, which updates database 220 as attack vectors for accessing, manipulating and hopping to computers evolve over time.

(18) Policy database 230 stores, for each group of computers, G1, G2, . . . , policies for planting decoy attack vectors in computers of that group. Each policy specifies decoy attack vectors that are planted in each group, in accordance with attack vectors stored in database 220. For user credentials, the decoy attack vectors planted on a computer lead to another resource in the network. For attack vectors to access an FTP or other server, the decoy attack vectors planted on a computer lead to a decoy server 240.

(19) It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art the databases 220 and 230 may be combined into a single database, or distributed over multiple databases.

(20) Deception management server 210 includes a policy manager 211, a deployment module 212, and a forensic application 213. Policy manager 211 defines a decoy and response policy. The response policy defines different decoy types, different decoy combinations, response procedures, notification services, and assignments of policies to specific network nodes, network users, groups of nodes or users or both. Once policies are defined, they are stored in policy database 230 with the defined assignments.

(21) Deception management server 210 obtains the policies and their assignments from policy database 230, and delivers them to appropriate nodes and groups. It than launches deployment module 212 to plant decoys in end points, servers, applications, routers, switches, relays and other entities in the network. Deployment module 212 plants each decoy, based on its type, in memory (RAM), disk, or in any other data or information storage area, as appropriate. Deployment module 212 plants the decoy attack vectors in such a way that the chances of a valid user accessing the decoy attack vectors are low. Deployment module 212 may or may not stay resident.

(22) Forensic application 213 is a real-time application that is transmitted to a destination computer in the network, when a decoy attack vector is accessed by a computer 110. When forensic application 213 is launched on the destination computer, it identifies a process running within that computer 110 that accessed that decoy attack vector, logs the activities performed by the thus-identified process in a forensic report, and transmits the forensic report to deception management server 210.

(23) Once an attacker is detected, a response procedure is launched. The response procedure includes inter alia various notifications to various addresses, and actions on a decoy server such as launching an investigation process, and isolating, shutting down and re-imaging one or more network nodes. The response procedure collects information available on one or more nodes that may help in identifying the attacker's attack acts, attention and progress.

(24) Each decoy server 240 includes a tar-pit module 241, which is a process that purposely delays incoming connections, thereby providing additional time for forensic application 213 to launch and log activities on a computer 110 that is accessing the decoy server. Each decoy server 240 also includes a forensic alert module 242, which alerts management system 210 that an attacker is accessing the decoy server via a computer 110 of the network, and causes deception management server 210 to send forensic application 213 to the computer that is accessing the decoy server. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, decoy server 240 may store forensic application 213, in which case decoy server 240 may transmit forensic application 213 directly to the computer that is accessing the decoy server. In another alternative embodiment of the present invention, deception management server 210 or decoy server 240 may transmit forensic application 213 to a destination computer other than the computer that is accessing the decoy server.

(25) Notification servers (not shown) are notified when an attacker uses a decoy. The notification servers may discover this by themselves, or by using information stored on access governor 150 and SIEM 160. The notification servers forward notifications, or results of processing multiple notifications, to create notification time lines or such other analytics.

(26) Reference is made to FIG. 5, which is a simplified flowchart of a method 1100 for network surveillance and notification using decoy servers, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The flowchart of FIG. 5 is divided into three columns. The leftmost column includes operations performed by deception management server 210. The middle column includes operations performed by a decoy server B that is accessed from a computer A using decoy attack vectors. The rightmost column includes operations performed by computer A.

(27) At operation 1105, deployment module 212 plants decoy attack vectors in computers 110 in accordance with the policies in database 230. At operation 1110 decoy server B recognizes that it is being accessed from a computer A via a decoy attack vector. At operation 1115, tar-pit module 241 of decoy server B delays access to data and resources on decoy server B. The delaying performed at operation 1115 provides additional time for decoy server B to send a request to deception management server 210 to transmit forensic application 213 to computer A, and for computer A to receive and run forensic application 213. At operation 1120, decoy server B sends a request to deception management server 210, to transmit real-time forensic application 213 to computer A.

(28) At operation 1125, deception management server 210 receives the request send by decoy server B, and at operation 1130 deception management server 210 transmits forensic application 213 to computer A.

(29) At operation 1135, computer A receives forensic application 213 from deception management server 210, and launches the application. At operation 1140, forensic application 213 identifies a process, P, running on computer A that is accessing decoy server B. At operation 1145, forensic application 213 logs activities performed by process P. At operation 1150, forensic application 213 transmits a forensic report to deception management server 210. Finally, at operation 1155, deception management server 210 receives the forensic report from computer A.

(30) In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, decoy server B may store forensic application 213, in which case decoy server B may transmit forensic application 213 directly to computer A, and operations 1120, 1125 and 1130 can be eliminated.

(31) In accordance with another alternative embodiment of the present invention, forensic application 213 is transmitted by deception management server 210 or by decoy server B to a destination computer other than computer A. When the destination computer launches forensic application 213, the application communicates with computer A to identify the process, P, running on computer A that is accessing decoy server B, log the activities performed by process P, and transmit the forensic report to deception management server 210

(32) Reference is made to FIG. 6, which is a simplified method for network surveillance and notification using decoy user credentials, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The flowchart of FIG. 6 is divided into three columns. The leftmost column includes operations performed by deception management server 210. The middle column includes operations performed by access governor 150. The rightmost column includes operations performed by a computer A that attempts to login to a computer B using decoy user credentials.

(33) At operation 1205, deployment module 212 plants decoy credentials in computers 110 in accordance with the policies in database 230. At operation 1210 access governor 150 receives an authorization request from a computer B for a login to a computer A using invalid user credentials. At operation 1215 access governor 150 reports the attempted invalid login to SIEM server 160.

(34) At operation 1225, deception management server 210 identifies an invalid login attempt event reported by SIEM server 160, and at operation 1230 deception management server 210 transmits real-time forensic application 213 to computer A.

(35) At operation 1235, computer A receives forensic application 213 from deception management server 210, and launches the application. At operation 1240, forensic application 213 identifies a process, P, running on computer A that is accessing computer B. At operation 1245, forensic application 213 logs activities performed by process P. At operation 1250, forensic application 213 transmits a forensic report to deception management server 210. Finally, at operation 1255, deception management server 210 receives the forensic report from computer A.

(36) In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, forensic application 213 is transmitted by deception management server 210 to a destination computer other than computer A. When the destination computer launches forensic application 213, the application communicates with computer A to identify the process, P, running on computer A that is accessing computer B, log the activities performed by process P, and transmit the forensic report to deception management server 210

(37) As mentioned above, conventional honeypot systems generate many false alerts. Embodiments of the present invention enhance confidence levels in identifying an attacker, by luring him into multiple access attempts to different resources monitored by the system.

(38) Reference is made to FIG. 7, which is a simplified diagram of a method for network surveillance using two-factor deception, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. At operation 1310 an attacker accesses a computer A of network 200. At operation 1320 the attacker obtains decoy credentials for accessing a computer B of network 200, the decoy credentials being of the form <username> <hash>, where <hash> is a hash value of a cleartext password. The decoy credentials are preferably planted in computer A such that the chances of a valid user or automated monitor accessing the credentials are low.

(39) At operation 1330 the attacker derives the cleartext password from <hash>. Operation 1330 may be performed by rainbow tables, which are pre-computed tables for reversing cryptographic hash functions. At operation 1340 the attacker attempts a login to computer B using the cleartext version of the decoy credentials <username> <cleartext password>. At this stage, the chances of such login being performed by a valid user or automated monitor are extremely low, since this login requires two suspicious factors; namely, (i) extracting the decoy credentials with the hash value of the cleartext password from computer A, and (ii) reversing the extracted hash value to obtain the cleartext password.

(40) It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the two-factor method shown in FIG. 7 can be extended to more than two factors by successively planting a trail of decoy credentials that lead from one computer to the next.

(41) In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to the specific exemplary embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.