FORMATION PROCESS FOR A POTASSIUM-ION HYBRID SUPER-CAPACITOR
20230077860 · 2023-03-16
Assignee
Inventors
- Marie-Eve YVENAT (Grenoble cedex 09, FR)
- Philippe AZAIS (Grenoble cedex 09, FR)
- Benoît CHAVILLON (Grenoble cedex 09, FR)
- Eric MAYOUSSE (Grenoble cedex 09, FR)
- Fabien PERDU (Grenoble cedex 09, FR)
Cpc classification
H01G11/84
ELECTRICITY
H01G11/02
ELECTRICITY
Y02E60/13
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
H01G11/62
ELECTRICITY
International classification
H02J7/34
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
Formation process for a potassium-ion hybrid supercapacitor, the process comprising: a) supplying the potassium-ion hybrid supercapacitor comprising: a negative electrode comprising graphite, a positive electrode comprising activated carbon, an electrolyte comprising a potassium salt, b) charging the supercapacitor at constant current in a protocol of between C.sub.x/50 and C.sub.x/2, to a charge cutoff voltage of between 3.0 V and 3.3 V, c) holding the supercapacitor at the charge cutoff voltage until the leakage current is between C.sub.x/2000 and C.sub.x/500, d) discharging the supercapacitor at constant current in a protocol of between C.sub.x/50 and C.sub.x, to a discharge cutoff voltage of between 0 V and 2 V,
where the process further comprises degassing the supercapacitor after one of steps b) to d).
Claims
1. Formation process for a potassium-ion hybrid supercapacitor, the process comprising: a) supplying the potassium-ion hybrid supercapacitor comprising: a negative electrode comprising graphite, a positive electrode comprising activated carbon, an electrolyte comprising at least one potassium salt, b) charging the supercapacitor at constant current in a protocol of between C.sub.x/50 and C.sub.x/2, to a charge cutoff voltage of between 3.0 V and 3.3 V, where C.sub.x is the formation capacity of the intercalation compound KC.sub.8, c) holding the supercapacitor at the charge cutoff voltage until the leakage current is between C.sub.x/2000 and C.sub.x/500, d) discharging the supercapacitor at constant current in a protocol of between C.sub.x/50 and C.sub.x, to a discharge cutoff voltage of between 0 V and 2 V, where the process further comprises degassing the supercapacitor after one of steps b) to d).
2. Process according to claim 1, where at least one of steps b) to d) is implemented at a temperature of between 15° C. and 30° C.
3. Process according to claim 2, where all of steps b) to d) are implemented at a temperature of between 15° C. and 30° C.
4. Process according to claim 1, where the charging in step b) and the discharging in step d) are carried out in a protocol of between C.sub.x/15 and C.sub.x/5.
5. Process according to claim 4, where the charging in step b) and the discharging in step d) are carried out in a C.sub.x/10 protocol.
6. Process according to claim 1, where the hold time in step c) is between 20 hours and 28 hours.
7. Process according to claim 6, where the hold time in step c) is 24 hours.
8. Process according to claim 1, where the leakage current at the end of step c) is equal to C.sub.x/1000.
9. Process according to claim 1, where the degassing of the supercapacitor is carried out after step d).
10. Process according to claim 1, where the electrolyte is non-aqueous.
11. Process according to claim 1, wherein the at least one potassium salt present in the electrolyte is in solution in at least one organic solvent.
12. Process according to claim 1, wherein the at least one potassium salt present in the electrolyte is selected from KClO.sub.4, KBF.sub.4, KPF.sub.6, potassium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, potassium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, potassium bis(oxalato)borate, KSCN, KSbF.sub.6, KAsF.sub.6, KAlCl.sub.4, KSiF.sub.6, KSO.sub.3CF.sub.3 and mixtures thereof.
13. Process according to claim 12, wherein the at least one potassium salt present in the electrolyte is selected from KClO.sub.4, KBF.sub.4, KPF.sub.6 and mixtures thereof.
14. Process according to claim 12, wherein the at least one potassium salt is in solution in at least one solvent selected from carbonate solvents, linear ether solvents, nitrile solvents, lactone solvents, amide solvents and mixtures thereof.
15. Process according to claim 14, wherein said solvent is selected from propylene carbonate, ethylene carbonate, diethyl carbonate, dimethyl carbonate, dimethoxyethane, acetonitrile, γ-butyrolactone, dimethylformamide and mixtures thereof.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0044] The invention may be appreciated more fully from a reading of the detailed description hereinafter of implementation examples which are not limiting on said invention, and from examination of the appended drawing, in which:
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0049]
[0050]
[0051] In these tests, the reference formation process used corresponds to five charge/discharge cycles at C.sub.x or 5C.sub.y from 0.5 to 3.5 V.
[0052] It is seen in
[0053]
[0054] It is seen in
[0055]
[0056] In these tests, the implementation example of the formation process according to the invention that is used comprises the succession: [0057] of charging the supercapacitor at constant current in a C.sub.x/10 or C.sub.y/2 protocol to a charge cutoff voltage of 3.2 V, [0058] of holding the supercapacitor at the charge cutoff voltage of 3.2 V for a hold time of 24 hours, [0059] of discharging the supercapacitor to a discharge cutoff voltage of 0.5 V, and [0060] of degassing the supercapacitor.
[0061] It is seen in
[0062]
[0063] The key to
[0064] Curve 1 corresponds to an implementation example of the process according to the invention.
[0065] Curve 2 corresponds to an implementation example of the process according to the invention without step b).
[0066] Curve 3 corresponds to an implementation example of the process according to the invention without the degassing.
[0067] Curve 4 corresponds to an implementation example of the process according to the invention without step b), which is replaced by a step of charging the supercapacitor at constant current in a protocol of more than C.sub.x/2 (5 mA), to a charge cutoff voltage of between 3.0 V and 3.3 V.
[0068] Curve 5 corresponds to an implementation example of the process according to the invention without step c), which is replaced by a step of holding the supercapacitor at the charge cutoff voltage until the leakage current is equal to 10 μA.
[0069] It is seen in
[0070] The invention is of course not limited to the implementation example of the process, which is given for the purpose of illustration and is non-limiting.