CATALYST AND METHOD FOR PREPARING A CATALYST
20170209849 · 2017-07-27
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01D53/9418
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J35/60
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J31/069
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J27/16
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J37/0219
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D2257/404
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J35/56
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J35/19
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J37/0244
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J37/0217
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J21/063
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A catalyst with a porous, ceramic support body having a porosity which is formed by pores in at least a part of the ceramic support body, and which furthermore has a catalytically active washcoat coating applied to the ceramic support body, which catalytically active washcoat coating having a layer thickness, comprises a permanent catalytically inactive impregnation comprising at least one catalytically inactive inorganic component, and wherein the permanent inactive impregnation has a layer thickness and is present at least partially between a surface of the porous ceramic support body and the catalytically active washcoat coating is present in the pores of the ceramic support body in a region with reduced porosity underneath the surface of the ceramic support body.
Claims
1. Catalyst with a porous, ceramic support body having a porosity which is formed by pores in at least a part of the ceramic support body, and which furthermore has a catalytically active washcoat coating applied to the ceramic support body, which catalytically active washcoat coating having a layer thickness, wherein the support body has a permanent catalytically inactive impregnation comprising at least one catalytically inactive inorganic component, and wherein the permanent inactive impregnation: a) has a layer thickness and is present at least partially between a surface of the porous ceramic support body and the catalytically active washcoat coating; and/or b) is present in the pores of the ceramic support body in a region with reduced porosity underneath the surface of the ceramic support body.
2. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the support body is a monolithic component and only a sub-region of the monolithic component is provided with the impregnation.
3. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the support body is a monolithic component and the monolithic component is provided in a front region as an SCR sub-region and in a rear region with the permanent catalytically inactive impregnation and is formed as an ASC sub-region.
4. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the at least one catalytically inactive inorganic component is a sol, particularly a titanium sol or a silicon sol, water glass, a silane, particularly an alkylsilane, a siloxane, a phosphate, particularly an aluminium phosphate or a combination of any two or more thereof.
5. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the at least one catalytically inactive inorganic component is an aluminium phosphate.
6. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the pores are sealed by the impregnation.
7. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the at least one inorganic component has inorganic particles having a mean particle size in the range of 1-100 nm.
8. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the impregnation is applied as a ceramic, dense coating which forms an intermediate layer.
9. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the layer thickness of the impregnation is in the range of 1 to 50 m, wherein the layer thickness is in particular less than the layer thickness of the washcoat coating.
10. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the impregnation comprises aluminium oxide and/or silicon oxide and/or titanium oxide and the proportion of which in the impregnation is in particular in the range of 50 to 100% by volume.
11. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the support body consists of a catalytically active material.
12. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the support body is an extruded support body, in particular a honeycomb.
13. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the support body has as catalytically active material a vanadium oxide in a support material composed of a metal oxide, in particular a titanium oxide.
14. Catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the support body has a porosity of greater than 40%.
15. Method for preparing a catalyst according to claim 1, wherein firstly an impregnating agent and subsequently a washcoat coating is applied to a porous ceramic support body, wherein the impregnating agent comprises at least one inorganic catalytically inactive component and the impregnating agent is applied for the formation of a permanent inorganic and non-catalytic impregnation and is subjected to a temperature treatment, wherein the impregnating agent: (a) is introduced into the support body close to the surface such that the porosity of the support body is reduced at least in the region of the surface; and/or (b) is applied to the support body for the formation of an additional inorganic and catalytically inactive intermediate layer between the support body and the washcoat coating.
Description
[0059] A working example of the invention will be explained in more detail below with reference to the figures. These each show in highly simplified representations:
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064] In the figures, identical parts are each provided with the same reference numerals.
[0065] A catalyst 2 shown in
[0066] The support body 4 in this case is a highly porous ceramic body having a porosity of 40 to 60% and especially 50%. The pores here customarily have a pore size of greater than 10 nm and preferably greater than 100 nm.
[0067] Honeycomb catalysts of this type are used especially in motor vehicles for exhaust gas treatment. For this purpose, a respective catalyst 2 is introduced into the exhaust gas system of a motor vehicle.
[0068] In the course of preparation, the support body 4 is provided with an impregnation 12 in the region of the ASC sub-region 2B before applying the washcoat coating 10, as is illustrated in detail with reference to
[0069]
[0070] In the course of preparation, in both embodiment variants, a surface 14 of the support body 4 is provided with an impregnating agent in each case. This is preferably carried out by dipping the support body 4 in the liquid impregnating agent and specifically only in the sub-region in which the ASC sub-region 2B is to be formed.
[0071] According to the first embodiment variant depicted in
[0072] Of particular significance is the fact that the impregnating agent comprises inorganic constituents which clog the pores of the support body 4 in the region of the impregnation 12 and seal them. In this case, the impregnating agent comprises inorganic particles having a particle size preferably in the range between 1 and at most 100 nm, particularly in the range between 20 and 50 nm. By means of the impregnation 12, the originally porous surface 14 of the support body 4 is therefore sealed. Subsequently, the washcoat coating 10 is applied. This is usually carried out by applying in turn a suspension and subsequently subjecting it to a temperature treatment. Particularly in the all-active extrudate preferred here, such washcoats are applied as a relatively liquid aqueous solution. By means of the impregnation 12, introducing the aqueous washcoat solution into the support body 4 is at least substantially and preferably completely avoided.
[0073] In this way, in the application of the washcoat coating, the water contained in the washcoat suspension can remain, preventing concentration and resultant thickening of the washcoat suspension, so that overall a homogeneous, uniform washcoat coating is formed with a constant coating depth. This typically has a layer thickness d1 in the region of 30 to 150 m. Furthermore, complete blockage of the channels can be avoided.
[0074] In contrast to the embodiment variant of
[0075] The intermediate layer 16 has in this case a layer thickness d2 in the region between 1 and 50 m. The layer thickness d2 is in this case less than the layer thickness d1 of the washcoat coating 10.
WORKING EXAMPLE 1
[0076] The effectiveness of the impregnation for reducing the water uptake was investigated for the following washcoat coating as follows:
[0077] A porous, honeycombed support body 4 was first provided without impregnation (comparative body) and a further support body with impregnation (test body).
[0078] For the impregnation, the support bodies 4 were inserted into a 25% (test body 1) and a 50% (test body 2) aluminium phosphate solution for 10 minutes. To prepare the 25% solution, LITHOPIX P1 was mixed with water in a 1:1 ratio. The 50% solution is the LITHOPIX P1 solution. Excess solution was subsequently removed. For this purpose, the support body 4 was blown with compressed air. The support body was then dried in the drying cabinet at 60 C. for 24 h and finally baked at 60 C. for 1.5 h.
[0079] The bodies were dipped in water under identical conditions (same water temperature, same immersion time) and subsequently weighed. The weight increase corresponds to the water uptake. The water uptake by the comparative body was taken as standard (normalized to 100% water uptake).
[0080] The results are as follows:
TABLE-US-00001 Support body Water uptake [in %] Comparative body 100 Test body 1 84 Test body 2 50
[0081] A distinctly reduced water uptake is therefore achieved with the impregnation, wherein the solution with the higher solids content results in a lower water uptake.
WORKING EXAMPLE 2
[0082] The effectiveness of the intermediate layer 16 for maintaining the catalytic activity, i.e. a decrease in the age-related reduction of the activity, was investigated as follows: An SCR catalyst (honeycomb catalyst) was provided in which first a support body 4 was provided with washcoat coating 10 applied directly to the support body 4 (comparative catalyst). As test catalyst, an identical support body 4 was provided initially with the intermediate layer 16 and subsequently the identical washcoat coating 10 as the for the comparative catalyst was applied. An aluminium oxide layer was applied as intermediate layer 16. Both catalysts were aged under realistic conditions. For this purpose, they were perfused for 100 h with a hot exhaust gas at 580 C. from a motor on an engine test bench with ammonia metering. The ammonia conversion (ratio of the ammonia on the inlet side and the outlet side) was then measured as a criterion for the catalytic activity at various temperatures under identical measuring conditions. The measuring conditions were as follows: space velocity (ratio of gas volume stream to catalyst volume): 150 000/h; NH3 fraction: 500 ppm; CO.sub.2: 4.5%; H.sub.2O: 5%; CO: 200 ppm; O.sub.2: 12%, remainder N.sub.2.
[0083] The measured NH.sub.3 conversion was as follows (normalized to 100% based on comparative catalyst):
TABLE-US-00002 Exhaust gas temperature [ c.] 250 300 350 400 Comparative catalyst [%] 100 100 100 100 Test catalyst [%] 100 175 157 126
[0084] The test catalyst shows a distinctly improved catalytic activity compared to the comparative catalyst, particularly in the average temperature range.
REFERENCE NUMERAL LIST
[0085] 2 Catalyst [0086] 2A SCR sub-region [0087] 2B ASC sub-region [0088] 4 Support body [0089] 6 Flow channel [0090] 8 Direction of flow [0091] 10 Washcoat coating [0092] 12 Impregnation [0093] 14 Surface [0094] 16 Intermediate layer [0095] T Penetration depth [0096] d1 Layered washcoat [0097] d2 Intermediate layer thickness