PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING A HYDROCARBON GAS STREAM

Abstract

A process for separating a mixed or raw gas feed to produce a dry gas product and a hydrocarbon liquid product is provided. The process comprises scrubbing heavier hydrocarbon components from the gas feed to produce a lighter ends gas stream and a heavier ends liquid stream; cooling the lighter ends gas stream and separating the cooled lighter ends gas stream into a cold liquid stream and the dry gas product; and using the cold liquid stream to assist in scrubbing the heavier hydrocarbon components from the gas feed.

Claims

1. A process for separating a mixed or raw gas feed including natural gas, refinery gas, and synthetic gas, the gas feed containing methane; C.sub.2 components, C.sub.3 components, C.sub.4 components and heavier hydrocarbon components (C.sub.5+) into a dry gas product containing a portion of C.sub.3 and C.sub.4 components, comprising: (a) scrubbing heavier hydrocarbon components from the gas feed to produce a lighter ends gas stream and a heavier ends liquid stream; (b) cooling the lighter ends gas stream and separating the cooled lighter ends gas stream into a cold liquid stream and the dry gas product; and (c) using the cold liquid stream to assist in scrubbing the heavier hydrocarbon components from the cooled gas feed in step (a).

2. The process as claimed in claim 1, further comprising cooling the gas feed prior to step (a) to reduce energy required in step (b).

3. The process as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: (d) distilling and/or fractionating the heavier ends liquid stream to form a hydrocarbon gas liquid product that contains a desired portion of C.sub.3 and C.sub.4 components and an overhead gas stream.

4. The process as claimed in claim 3, wherein the overhead gas stream is compressed and the compressed gas stream is combined with the gas feed for further processing.

5. The process as claimed in claim 3, wherein the hydrocarbon gas liquid product comprises the majority of the C.sub.5+ hydrocarbon components present in the gas feed.

6. The process as claimed in claim 3, wherein the hydrocarbon gas liquid product comprises greater than 95% of the C.sub.5+ hydrocarbon components present in the gas feed.

7. The process as claimed in claim 3, wherein the hydrocarbon gas liquid product comprises greater than 99% of the C.sub.5+ hydrocarbon components present in the gas feed.

8. The process as claimed in claim 4, wherein when the gas feed has a richness greater than 2 GPM, the hydrocarbon gas liquid product comprises about 100% of the C.sub.5 and C.sub.6+ hydrocarbon components present in the raw gas stream.

9. The process as claimed in claim 8, wherein when the raw gas feed has a richness between 2 GPM and 9 GPM, the raw gas feed pressure ranges between 200 and 1050 Psig, and the light ends gas stream are cooled and separated at a temperature between 40 F. and +25 F., the hydrocarbon gas liquid product comprises substantially all the C5+ hydrocarbon components and the desired portion of C.sub.3 and C.sub.4 components to achieve a desired hydrocarbon dew point.

10. The process as claimed in claim 3, wherein the heavier ends liquid stream are fractionated in a fractionation tower operated at a range between 80 Psig to 350 Psig.

11. The process as claimed in claim 3, wherein the heavier ends liquid stream are flash distilled in a flash separator.

12. The process as claimed in claim 10, wherein the fractionation tower further comprises a reboiler and the reboiler temperature is selected in a range from 140 F. to 320 F., to reject the desired proportion of C.sub.3 and C.sub.4 components from the heavier ends liquid stream to the overhead gas stream.

13. The process as claimed in claim 12, wherein the fractionation tower further comprises a reflux condenser to achieve higher recovery and better separation of C.sub.3 and/or C.sub.4 components from the heavier ends liquid stream.

14. The process as claimed in claim 13, wherein the overhead gas stream is compressed and the compressed gas stream is combined with the gas feed for further processing.

15. The process as claimed 14, wherein the operating pressure and temperature of the fractionation tower is dependent in part on what portion of the C.sub.3 and C.sub.4 components are to be directed to the overhead gas stream.

16. The process as claimed in claim 2, wherein the gas feed is cooled in at least one heat exchanger.

17. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the heavier hydrocarbon components are scrubbed from the gas feed in an absorber to produce the lighter ends gas stream and the heavier ends liquid stream.

18. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the lighter ends gas stream is cooled in a gas chilling device.

19. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the cooled lighter ends gas stream are separated into the cold liquid stream and the dry gas product in a cold separator.

20. An apparatus for separating a mixed or raw gas feed including natural gas, refinery gas, and synthetic gas, the gas feed containing methane, C.sub.2 components, C.sub.3 components, C.sub.4 components and heavier hydrocarbon components (C.sub.5+), into a dry gas product containing a portion of C.sub.3 and C.sub.4 components, comprising: an absorber for receiving the gas feed and scrubbing heavier hydrocarbon components from the gas feed to form a lighter ends gas stream and a heavier ends liquid stream; a first cooling device for receiving the lighter ends gas stream and cooling the lighter ends gas stream; and a cold separator for receiving the cooled lighter ends gas stream and removing condensed liquids from the cooled lighter ends gas stream to form the dry gas product.

21. The apparatus as claimed in claim 20, further comprising: at least one second cooling device for cooling the gas feed prior to sending it to the absorber.

22. The apparatus as claimed in claim 20, further comprising: a feed pump for pumping the condensed liquids back to the absorber to assist in scrubbing heavier hydrocarbon components from the gas feed.

23. The apparatus as claimed in claim 20, further comprising: a flash distillation separator and/or a fractionation tower for receiving the heavier ends liquid stream from the absorber and fractionating the heavier ends liquid stream to form hydrocarbon gas liquids and a recycle gas stream.

24. The apparatus as claimed in claim 23, further comprising: an overhead gas compressor to increase the pressure of the overhead gas stream to form a recycle gas stream for reprocessing.

25. The apparatus as claimed in claim 24, wherein the recycle gas stream is added to the gas feed prior to further processing.

26. An improved apparatus for separating a mixed or raw gas feed including natural gas, refinery gas, and synthetic gas, the gas feed containing methane, C.sub.2 components, C.sub.3 components, C.sub.4 components and heavier hydrocarbon components (C.sub.5+), into a dry gas product containing a portion of C.sub.3 and C.sub.4 components, said apparatus comprising in series at least one heat exchanger, a gas chiller, a cold separator and a gas/liquid fractionator, said improvement comprising: an absorber operably connected to the at least one heat exchanger for receiving a cooled gas feed from the at least one heat exchanger and scrubbing heavier hydrocarbon components from the cooled gas feed in the absorber to form a lighter ends gas stream and a heavier ends liquid stream prior to sending the lighter ends gas stream to the gas chiller.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0030] Referring to the drawings wherein like reference numerals indicate similar parts throughout the several views, several aspects of the present invention are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in detail in the following figures. It is understood that the drawings provided herein are for illustration purposes only and are not necessarily drawn to scale.

[0031] FIG. 1 is a schematic depiction of a conventional refrigeration process and apparatus of the prior art.

[0032] FIG. 2 is a schematic depiction of one embodiment of the process and apparatus of the present invention.

[0033] FIG. 3 is a schematic depiction of another embodiment of the process and apparatus of the present invention as an addition or retrofit to an existing conventional refrigeration process.

[0034] FIG. 4 is a graph showing the % recovery of C.sub.4, C.sub.5 and C.sub.6+ hydrocarbons in a HGL stream from a hydrocarbon gas stream when using the process of the present invention (Enhanced) to effectively direct all the C.sub.3 to the sales gas stream over a feed gas richness ranging from 1 to 9 GPM, (gal/mcf) in comparison to the conventional refrigeration process of the prior art.

[0035] FIG. 5 is a graph showing the % recovery of C.sub.6+, C.sub.5, C.sub.4, C.sub.3, from a hydrocarbon gas stream having a richness of 5 GPM at a constant cold separator pressure of 600 Psig, and at various cold separator temperatures ranging between 40 F. and 20 F., using the process of the present invention (Enhanced) when directing effectively all the C.sub.3 to the sales gas stream, in comparison to the conventional refrigeration process of the prior art.

[0036] FIG. 6 is a graph showing the % recovery of C.sub.5, and C.sub.4, from a hydrocarbon gas stream having a richness of 5 GPM at a constant cold separator temperature of 13 F., and at various cold separator pressures between 200 Psig and 1200 Psig, using the process of the present invention (Enhanced) when directing effectively all the C.sub.3 to the sales gas stream, in comparison to the conventional refrigeration process of the prior art.

[0037] FIG. 7 is a graph showing the C.sub.4 recovery versus refrigeration power for a hydrocarbon gas stream having a richness of 5 GPM using the process of the present invention (Enhanced) in comparison to the conventional refrigeration process of the prior art.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

[0038] The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of various embodiments of the present invention and is not intended to represent the only embodiments contemplated by the inventor. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a comprehensive understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details.

[0039] The purpose of gas processing such as natural gas processing is to convert raw natural gas into sales gas and HGL which can be delivered to end user markets, In other words, gas processing conditions gas to commercial specifications, e.g., hydrocarbon dew point (HCDP), water content, heating value, and other qualities as specified by a particular gas transmission or distribution company. Further, gas processing allows for the recovery of higher value liquefied products such as C.sub.2, C.sub.3, C.sub.4, and C.sub.5+ hydrocarbons, processed by one or more fractionation steps to meet commercial specifications such as hydrocarbon component content, vapor pressure, and density. As used herein rich gas means a gas which contains heavier hydrocarbons and is typically between temperatures of 30 F. and 120 F., and is typically provided at pressures between 200 Psig and 1000 Psig.

[0040] FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of a hydrocarbon gas processing plant of the present invention. In particular, rich gas feed 210 is combined with recycle gas (stream 227) to produce stream 211, which stream 211 can be further processed in at least one heat exchanger. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, stream 211 is only fed to a single heat exchanger as stream 212. Stream 212 is fed into a gas/gas heat exchanger 202 and is cooled in heat exchanger 202 by heat exchange with cool stream 218. It is understood, however, that stream 212 can be cooled in one or more of any cooling device, for example, such as a cooling tower, evaporative cooler, water chiller, gas chiller, waste heat exchanger, Joule-Thompson expansion valve, and the like.

[0041] However, unlike in the conventional refrigeration process shown in FIG. 1 (Prior Art), cooled gas stream 213 is directed to the bottom of heavy ends absorber tower 250, where the heavy ends are scrubbed out. Thus, in this embodiment, the flow of cooled gas stream 213 does not go to gas chiller 203 (as is the case in the conventional refrigeration process) and, instead, is directed to absorber 250. The absorber may be filled with suitable packing or trays. In absorber 250, the heavy ends are scrubbed out and are removed from the bottom of absorber 250 as liquids 224. The remaining scrubbed gas stream 216 is removed from the top of the absorber 250 and directed into gas chiller 203 for further cooling. It is understood, however, that stream 216 can be cooled in one or more of any cooling device, for example, such as a Joule-Thompson expansion valve, gas chiller, waste heat/cold exchanger, and the like. Gas chiller 203 commonly uses propane as the refrigerant but other refrigerants known in the art can also be used. Temperatures in the chiller typically range between 40 F. and 25 F.

[0042] The cold gas 217 is then fed to a cold gas separator 205, where the condensed liquids 222 are separated from the gas stream. The dry residue gas stream 218 that is produced in cold gas separator 205 is directed to gas/gas heat exchanger 202 and is used to cool gas stream 212. It is understood that heat exchanger 202 aids in reducing the energy requirement in gas chiller 203, and elevates the temperature of the sales gas stream 220 for further processing or transmission. The warmed sales gas 220 is dry relative to the rich gas feed stream 210, and is often intended to be conveyed to the gas transmission pipeline for sale (dry sales gas 220). It is understood, however, that warming the sales gas stream may not be necessary if the sales gas stream is intended to go to further cryogenic processing, for example, ethane production or liquefied natural gas (LNG) production.

[0043] Condensed liquids 222 produced in cold separator 205 are then pumped via feed pump 251 and returned to the top of absorber 250 as liquid stream 223. The counter-current flow of cooled gas stream 213 and liquid stream 223 allow the two streams to contact one another in the absorber 250 and, thus, provides multiple stages of contact to alter the composition of both the gas stream produced (gas stream 216) and the liquid stream 224. In particular, liquid stream 224 will contain fewer light hydrocarbons (e.g., C.sub.1 and C.sub.2 hydrocarbons) than in stream 223 and additional heavy hydrocarbons (e.g., C.sub.5+ hydrocarbons), which have been removed (scrubbed) from the cooled gas stream 213. Hence, the heavy hydrocarbons are scrubbed from the cooled gas stream 213 and the light hydrocarbons are stripped from light liquid stream 223. Thus, the absorber 250, gas chiller 203 and cold separator 205, in combination, operate as a rectifier column, reducing the light end components and increasing the heavier components in the absorber 250 bottom liquid product stream 224, thereby providing sharp separation between light key components and heavy key components.

The liquid stream 224 is removed from the bottom of absorber 250 and flash expanded through expansion (adjustable) valve 206 to the operating pressure of fractionation tower 208. During expansion a portion of the stream is vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream. The expanded stream 225 leaving expansion valve 206 is sent to fractionating tower 208 to distill the light ends (e.g. methane, ethane and propane) from the liquid, resulting in heavy liquid product 230 and light ends gaseous stream 226. The fractionation tower 208 comprises a reboiler 256, which provides heat and generates vapors to drive the distillation or fractionation process. The fractionation tower pressure typically ranges between 80 Psig to 350 Psig and reboiler temperatures range may from 140 F. to 320 F. The fractionation tower provides the versatility and ability to reject the desired proportion of mid-components from the heavy liquid product stream 225, back into the raw gas as the overhead gas stream 226. The selected operating pressure and temperature is dependent in part on what portions of mid-components are to be rejected, and the composition of the heavy liquid stream. In one embodiment, the fractionation tower 208 may further comprises a reflux condenser (not shown) to improve separation of the mid-components from the heavier ends liquid stream.

[0044] The overhead gas stream 226 from the fractionation tower 208 is then compressed in overhead compressor 209 to produce recycle gas 227. Recycle gas 227 is recycled by combining with the rich gas feed 210 and reprocessed. The bottom heavy liquids product 230 contains the HGL extracted from the gas stream.

[0045] In comparison to the conventional refrigeration process shown in FIG. 1, the HGL 230 produced by the process shown in FIG. 2 of the present invention significantly increases the volume of C.sub.5 recovered from rich gas streams having greater than 2 GPM, and significantly improves the propane rejection to the residue stream (sales gas). For example, with certain rich gas streams, i-pentane recovery in the HGL may be increased from 84.74% to 99.52%. Further, C.sub.3 rejection from HGL 230 may increase from 76.60% to 97.22%. Consequently, the dry sales gas 220 can be tailored to contain more propane and butane, thereby maximizing value from the raw gas stream for specific economic conditions.

[0046] In one embodiment, the conventional refrigeration process equipment shown in FIG. 1 can be retrofitted with an absorber to achieve similar benefits as realized when practicing the process shown in FIG. 2 and described above. With reference now to FIG. 3, in this embodiment, rich gas feed (stream 310) is combined with recycle gas (stream 327) to produce stream 311. Stream 311 is then separated into two steams, stream 312 and stream 314, where stream 314 enters a gas-to-liquid heat exchanger 301 and stream 312 enters a gas-to-gas heat exchanger 302. The heat exchangers reduce the temperature of the gas streams 312 and 314, which streams exit as cooled gas stream 315 and cooled gas stream 313, respectively. Streams 313 and 315 are then combined and, when block valve 352 is in the closed position, the combined cool gas stream (stream 331) is directed to the bottom of heavy ends absorber tower 350, where the heavy ends are scrubbed out. The flow of both cooled gas stream 313 and cooled gas stream 315 is controlled by block valve 352. In absorber 350, the heavy ends are scrubbed out and are removed from the bottom of absorber 350 as liquids 332. The remaining scrubbed gas stream 316 is removed from the top of the absorber 350 and directed into gas chiller 303 for further cooling. It is understood, however, that stream 316 can be cooled in one or more of any cooling device, for example, such as a Joule-Thompson expansion valve, gas chiller, waste heat/cold exchanger, and the like. Gas chiller 303 commonly uses propane as the refrigerant but other refrigerants known in the art can also be used. Temperatures in the chiller typically range between 40 F. and 25 F.

[0047] The cold gas 317 is then fed to a cold gas separator 305, where the condensed liquids 322 are separated from the gas stream. The dry residue gas stream 318 that is produced in cold gas separator 305 is directed to gas/gas heat exchanger 302 and is used to cool gas stream 312. It is understood that heat exchangers 301 and 302 aid in reducing the energy requirement in gas chiller 303, and elevate the temperature of the sales gas stream 320 for further processing or transmission. The warmed sales gas 320 is dry relative to the rich gas feed stream 310, and is often intended to be conveyed to the gas transmission pipeline for sale (dry sales gas 320). It is understood, however, that warming the sales gas stream may not be necessary if the sales gas stream is intended to go to further cryogenic processing, for example, ethane production or liquefied natural gas (LNG) production.

[0048] When block valve 353 is in the closed position, condensed liquids 322 produced in cold separator 305 are pumped via feed pump 351 and returned to the top of absorber 350 as liquid stream 323. The counter-current flow of combined cool gas stream 331 and liquid stream 323 allow the two streams to contact one another in the absorber 350 and, thus, provides multiple stages of contact to alter the composition of both the gas stream produced (gas stream 316) and the liquid stream 332. In particular, liquid stream 332 will contain fewer light hydrocarbons (e.g., C.sub.1 and C.sub.2 hydrocarbons) than in stream 323 and more heavy hydrocarbons (e.g., C.sub.5+ hydrocarbons), which have been removed (scrubbed) from the combined cool gas stream 331. Hence, the heavy hydrocarbons are scrubbed from the combined cool gas stream 331 and the light hydrocarbons are stripped from the liquid. Thus, in this embodiment, the absorber 350, gas chiller 303 and cold separator 305, in combination, also operate as a rectifier column, reducing the light end components and increasing the heavier components in the absorber 350 bottom liquid product stream 332, thereby providing sharp separation between light key components and heavy key components.

[0049] The liquid stream 332 is removed from the bottom of absorber 350 and passes into Gas/Liquid heat exchanger 301, being warmed by the raw gas stream 314. Stream 306 exits Gas/Liquid heat exchanger 301 and is flash expanded through expansion (adjustable) valve 306 to the operating pressure of fractionation tower 308. During expansion a portion of the stream is vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream. The expanded stream 325 leaving expansion valve 306 is sent to fractionating tower 308 to distill the light ends (e.g. methane, ethane and propane) from the liquid, resulting in heavy liquid product 330 and light ends gaseous stream 326. The fractionation tower 308 comprises a reboiler 356, which provides heat and generates vapors to drive the distillation or fractionation process. In one embodiment, the fractionation tower 308 may further comprises a reflux condenser (not shown) to improve separation of the light ends (e.g. methane, ethane and propane) from the heavier ends liquid stream.

[0050] The overhead gas stream 326 from the fractionation tower 308 is then compressed in overhead compressor 309 to produce recycle gas 327. Recycle gas 327 is recycled by combining with the rich gas feed 310 and reprocessed. The bottom heavy liquids product 330 contains the HGL extracted from the gas stream.

[0051] Thus, in the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the hydrocarbon gas processing plant can operate either as a conventional refrigeration processing plant or as a hydrocarbon gas processing plant of the present invention. When blocking valves 352, 353 are in the closed position, the plant operates as a hydrocarbon gas processing plant of the present invention. However, when block valves 352, 353 are in the open position, the plant will operate as a conventional refrigeration processing plant. The present invention is adaptable to existing gas processing plants already employing the prior art, or a version thereof.

Example 1

[0052] A comparison of the composition of the sales gas produced from the conventional refrigeration process (FIG. 1 (Prior Art)) and the sales gas of the present invention (FIG. 2) when targeting a sales gas hydrocarbon dew point (HCDP) of 23 F. at 800 Psig is shown in Table 1 below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Conventional Enhanced Component - mol fraction Rich Gas Feed Sales Gas Sales Gas Helium 0.000993 0.001043 0.001029 Nitrogen 0.008428 0.008856 0.008737 CO2 0.007692 0.008044 0.007973 H2S 0.000002 0.000002 0.000002 Methane 0.721123 0.757708 0.747454 Ethane 0.144403 0.151728 0.149624 Propane 0.073780 0.059381 0.073939 i-Butane 0.011130 0.004904 0.005582 n-Butane 0.021026 0.007102 0.005637 i-Pentane 0.004011 0.000643 0.000021 n-Pentane 0.003884 0.000476 0.000004 Hexane 0.001685 0.000072 0.000000 Heptane 0.001176 0.000034 0.000000 Octane 0.000574 0.000008 0.000000 Nonane 0.000078 0.000000 0.000000 Decane+ 0.000014 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000

[0053] It can be seen from Table 1 that when using the present invention (Enhanced), much more propane and i-butane report to the sales gas and much less C.sub.5+ hydrocarbons (i.e., i-pentane, n-pentane, n-hexane, n-heptane, n-octane, n-nonane and n-decane) are present therein when compared to the sales gas of the Prior Art (Conventional). Further, essentially no heavy hydrocarbons (C.sub.5+ components) were found in the sales gas. Hence, the enhancement of the present invention results in high recovery (removal) of heavy hydrocarbons (C.sub.5+ components) from the rich gas feed and more rejection of lighter hydrocarbons such as C.sub.3 and i-C.sub.4 to the sales gas product. Yet, both conventional and enhanced sales gas streams achieve the same HCDP.

[0054] Thus, under prescribed conditions, the present invention (Enhanced) produces a more valuable HGL stream per unit of volume than when using the Prior Art conventional refrigeration process. This can be seen more clearly in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Process Parameter Units Conventional Enhanced Rich Gas Feed Rate MMscfd 26.3 26.3 Sales Gas HCDP F. at Target 23 Target 23 800 Psig Cold Sep. Temperature F. 4.0 11.1 Cold Sep. Pressure Psig 490 480 Chiller duty MMbtu/hr 3.09 2.46 Refridge Compressor HP 788 569 27.8% Load HC liq to Fractionator bbl/day 2140 1874 Fractionator Pressure Psig 270 270 Fractionator Ovhd. Vol. MMscfd 2.49 1.93 Overhead Compressor HP 84 65 22.6% Load Fractionator Reboiler F. 204 252 Temperature Fractionator Reboiler MMbtu/hr 1.89 2.04 7.9% Duty HGL Product Volume bbl/day 942 729 Sales Gas Volume MMscfd 25.02 25.37 1.4% Higher Heating Value btu/scf 1219 1234 1.2% Propane Recovery % of Feed 23.40 2.78 i-Butane Recovery % of Feed 58.07 51.68 n-Butane Recovery % of Feed 67.85 74.55 i-Pentane Recovery % of Feed 84.74 99.52 n-Pentane Recovery % of Feed 88.33 99.91 Hexane Recovery % of Feed 95.93 100.00 Heptane Recovery % of Feed 98.55 100.00 Propane Yield bbl/day 293.3 38.7 Butanes Yield bbl/day 408.4 422.4 C5+ Yield bbl/day 240.7 267.8 HGL-Product:Feed Ratio bbl/ 37.68 29.14 MMscf

[0055] In particular, when targeting a sales gas HCDP of 23 F. at 800 Psig, it can be seen from Table 2 that the HGL stream produced using the Conventional process yields 293.3 bbl/d propane, 408.4 bbl/d of butanes and 240.7 bbl/d of pentanes+ (C.sub.5+). On the other hand, when using the Enhanced process of the present invention, only 38.7 bbl/d of propane are yielded in the HGL stream. This results in a marginally higher sales gas volume with slightly higher heating value due to more propane (C.sub.3) being directed to the sales gas stream, which may be favorable for specific economic conditions. Further, 267.8 bbl/d of pentanes+ (C.sub.5+) are yielded in the HGL stream (as compared to 240.7 bbl/d in Conventional), resulting in better recovery of heavy hydrocarbons in the HGL product.

[0056] Furthermore, Table 2 shows that when using the Enhanced process of the present invention the refrigeration compressor load decreases 27.8%, and the overhead compressor load decreases 22.6%, resulting in significantly lower utility requirements and slightly smaller equipment having lower capital costs, when comparing to the conventional refrigeration process (Prior Art). Further, the cold separator can be operated at a much higher temperature, i.e., 11.1 F. versus 4.0 F. with the conventional refrigeration process.

[0057] Table 3 below further illustrates the difference in intermediate liquid streams compositions generated in the conventional refrigeration of the prior art as compared to the present invention (Enhanced). Specifically, in the present invention, stream 222, which is the liquid stream produced in the cold separator 205, contains much less C.sub.5+ (heavy ends) as compared to stream 122 in the conventional refrigeration process. This is because the C.sub.5+ (heavy ends) have already been stripped out of the raw gas in the absorber 250, and, thus, a much lighter liquid product is produced in cold separator 205 to send to the absorber 250 as a scrubbing fluid.

[0058] Thus, liquid streams 224, 225, which are produced in the absorber 250 and fed to the fractionation tower 208, respectively, will contain higher volume flows of C.sub.4 (and C.sub.5+ heavier components) and much less C.sub.3 and lighter components when compared to liquid streams 122, 124 and 125 of the conventional art, which streams are produced in the cold separator 105, cooled in gas/liquid exchanger 101, and fed into fractionation tower 108, respectively.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Stream 122 & 125 Conventional Stream 222 Cold Sep. Enhanced Stream 225 Component - Liquid & Liq. Cold Sep. Enhanced bbl/d To Frac. Liquid Liq. To Frac. Helium 0 0 0 Nitrogen 1 1 1 CO2 9 6 4 H2S 0 0 0 Methane 358 234 190 Ethane 555 396 286 Propane 670 693 531 i-Butane 168 147 177 n-Butane 333 198 410 i-Pentane 84 2 103 n-Pentane 82 0 97 Hexane 42 0 45 Heptane 29 0 30 Octane 7 0 7 Nonane 11 0 11 Decane + 1 0 1 2349 1678 1892

Example 2

[0059] Table 4 below shows the flexibility of the present invention using the same rich gas feed as in Example 1. In this example, the objective is to obtain the maximum liquids possible, including propane and butanes, while the refrigeration compressor load is limited to 1151 HP for both the Conventional and Enhanced process.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Component - Rich Gas Conventional Enhanced mol fraction Feed Sales Gas Sales Gas Helium 0.000993 0.001081 0.001085 Nitrogen 0.008428 0.009176 0.009212 CO2 0.007692 0.008321 0.008407 H2S 0.000002 0.000002 0.000002 Methane 0.721123 0.784952 0.788098 Ethane 0.144403 0.156153 0.156904 Propane 0.073780 0.034538 0.036099 i-Butane 0.011130 0.002296 0.000159 n-Butane 0.021026 0.003042 0.000034 i-Pentane 0.004011 0.000237 0.000000 n-Pentane 0.003884 0.000166 0.000000 Hexane 0.001685 0.000022 0.000000 Heptane 0.001176 0.000010 0.000000 Octane 0.000574 0.000002 0.000000 Nonane 0.000078 0.000000 0.000000 Decane + 0.000014 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 Process Con- Parameter Units ventional Enhanced Rich Gas Feed Rate MMscfd 26.3 26.3 Sales Gas HCDP F. at 5.8 18.0 800 Psig Cold Sep. Temperature F. 13.0 29.2 Cold Sep. Pressure Psig 490 480 Chiller duty MMbtu/hr 4.35 3.61 Refridge Compressor Load HP 1151 1154 0.3% HC liq to Fractionator bbl/day 8416 2679 Fractionator Pressure Psig 300 300 Fractionator Ovhd. Vol. MMscfd 4.28 2.11 Overhead Compressor Load HP 144 63 56.3% Frationator Reboiler Temp. F. 188 192 Fractionator Reboiler Duty MMbtu/hr 2.49 2.27 8.8% HGL Product Volume bbl/day 1521 1599 Sales Gas Volume MMscfd 24.14 24.05 0.4% Higher Heating Value btu/scf 1167 1157 0.9% Propane Recovery % of Feed 57.00 55.23 i-Butane Recovery % of reed 81.05 98.69 n-Butane Recovery % of Feed 86.71 99.85 i-Pentane Recovery % of Feed 94.56 100.00 n-Pentane Recovery % of Feed 96.07 100.00 Hexane Recovery % of Feed 98.80 100.00 Heptane Recovery % of Feed 99.61 100.00 Propane Yield bbl/day 713.0 690.4 Butanes Yield bbl/day 536.6 628.6 C5+ Yield bbl/day 257.8 266.9 1,507 1,586 5.2% HGL-Product:Feed Ratio bbl/ 60.82 63.93 5.1% MMscf
Under the prescribed conditions, the present invention (Enhanced) is capable of achieving a lower Cold Separator temperature and consequently recovering higher amounts of HGL than when using the conventional refrigeration process (Conventional). Once again, the sales gas composition of the Enhanced process contains a lesser amount of butanes (C.sub.4) and pentanes+ (C.sub.5+) than does the Conventional process. As well, the utility requirements for the Overhead compressor load and Fractionation Reboiler Duty are significantly less.

Examples 3 and 4

[0060] Table 5 further shows the flexibility of the Enhanced process of the present invention using the same rich gas feed as in Example 1 and Example 2 above. Example 3 reflects the ability to reject propane into the sales gas stream, yet with high butane recovery in the HGL stream. Example 4 reflects the ability to direct both propane and butane into the sales gas stream to produce a de-butanized condensate (C.sub.5+) product stream.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Example 3 Example 4 Enhanced Enhanced Propane Butane Component - Rich Gas Rejection Rejection mol fraction Feed Sales Gas Sales Gas Helium 0.000993 0.001038 0.001005 Nitrogen 0.008428 0.008817 0.008537 CO2 0.007692 0.008043 0.007789 H2S 0.000002 0.000002 0.000002 Methane 0.721123 0.754234 0.730304 Ethane 0.144403 0.150850 0.146128 Propane 0.073780 0.074884 0.074431 i-Butane 0.011130 0.001593 0.011147 n-Butane 0.021026 0.000538 0.020250 i-Pentane 0.004011 0.000001 0.000324 n-Pentane 0.003884 0.000000 0.000084 Hexane 0.001685 0.000000 0.000000 Heptane 0.001176 0.000000 0.000000 Octane 0.000574 0.000000 0.000000 Nonane 0.000078 0.000000 0.000000 Decane + 0.000014 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 Process Parameter Units Rich Gas Feed Rate MMscfd 26.3 26.3 Sales Gas HCDP F. at 800 Psig 10.4 48.0 Cold Sep. Temperature F. 2.2 36.0 Cold Sep. Pressure Psig 480 480 Chiller duty MMbtu/hr 3.46 2.12 Refridge Compressor Load HP 864 449 HC liq to Fractionator bbl/day 3234 2233 Fractionator Pressure Psig 270 100 Fractionator Ovhd. Vol. MMscfd 3.89 2.94 Overhead Compressor Load HP 128 262 Fractinoator Reboiler Temp. F. 248 248 Fractionator Reboiler Duty MMbtu/hr 3.51 2.55 HGL Product Volume bbl/day 895 274 Sales Gas Volume MMscfd 25.13 25.95 Higher Heating Value btu/scf 1216 1279 Propane Recovery % of Feed 2.99 0.41 i-Butane Recovery % of Feed 86.32 1.15 n-Butane Recovery % of Feed 97.56 4.94 i-Pentane Recovery % of Feed 99.99 92.02 n-Pentane Recovery % of Feed 100.00 97.86 Hexane Recovery % of Feed 100.00 100.00 Heptane Recovery % of Feed 100.00 100.00 Propane Yield bbl/day 29.8 0.0 Butanes Yield bbl/day 596.6 13.2 C5+ Yield bbl/day 268.3 261.2 895 274 HGL-Product:Feed Ratio bbl/MMscf 35.77 10.97
In Example 3, the results show a sharp separation between C.sub.3 (propane) recovery at 2.99% and i-C.sub.4 (i-butane) recovery at 86.32%. Example 4, under different operating conditions, shows a sharp distinction between n-C.sub.4 (n-butane) recovery of 4.94%, and iC.sub.5 (i-pentane) recovery of 92.02%.

[0061] Examples 1 to 4 demonstrate the flexibility of the present invention and enable one to respond to market conditions to maximize the profitability from a raw gas stream.

Example 5

[0062] In Example 5, the process of the present invention is used (Enhanced refrigeration) to recover sales gas and HGL product. The cold separator is operated at 13 F. and 600 Psig and various gas feeds of varying richness were contemplated. The relative richness or amount of the heavier gaseous hydrocarbons, can be expressed in terms of gallons per mcf (thousand cubic feet), abbreviated as GPM. In this embodiment, GPM includes all hydrocarbon components heavier than methane and represents the total volume, in liquid gallons, contained in one thousand cubic feet of a particular gas at standard conditions.

[0063] Recovery of C.sub.6+ (heavy hydrocarbons), C.sub.5 (pentane) and C.sub.4 (butane) in the HGL product were determined and the results are shown in FIG. 4. It can be seen from the graph in FIG. 4 that, in both the present invention (Enhanced) and the conventional process (Conventional), the component recoveries gradually increase with increasing gas richness. However, component recoveries in the present invention (Enhanced) exceed the component recoveries in the conventional process (Conventional) when using raw gas feed streams having richness of about 2 GPM and higher. It can be seen that for 4 GPM gas, very high recoveries, approaching 100% of C.sub.5 and C.sub.6+, can be recovered in the HGL stream (i.e., removed from the raw gas feed stream).

[0064] Also significant is the fact that, when using the present invention (Enhanced) with any of the raw gas feed richness examined, essentially no propane is recovered in the HGL product. Thus, when using the present invention (Enhanced), essentially the total amount of propane can report to the sales gas stream under selected conditions. However, as demonstrated in Example 2, a significant amount of propane recovery is possible.

Example 6

[0065] In Example 6, the cold separator was operated at 600 Psig and various operating temperatures of the cold separator were contemplated using a raw gas feed stream having a richness of 5 GPM employing both the conventional prior art process (Conventional) and the process of the present invention (Enhanced). The graph in FIG. 5 shows that the cold separator can be operated at much higher temperatures in the present invention (Enhanced) for recovery of 100% of the C.sub.5 and C.sub.6+ hydrocarbons (in the HGL product) than when using the conventional refrigeration process (Conventional). In particular, at about 13 F., 100% of C.sub.5 was recovered in the present invention (Enhanced) whereas only about 92% of the C.sub.5 was recovered using conventional refrigeration process (Conventional). In fact, even at 25 F., only about 95% of the C.sub.5 was recovered in the conventional refrigeration process (Conventional). Also at the 25 F. cold separator temperature, the present invention (Enhanced) is capable of recovering 100% of the butane, whereas about only 80% of the C.sub.4 will also be removed by the conventional refrigeration process (Prior Art).

[0066] FIG. 5 also shows that, when it is desirable for butane to report to the sales gas stream and be rejected from the HGL stream, 97.4% C.sub.5 recovery can be achieved at only 14 F. cold separator temperature. Further, it can be seen that for all temperature ranges, very little C.sub.3 (propane) can be directed to the HGL product when using the present invention (Enhanced).

Example 7

[0067] In Example 7, the cold separator was operated at 13 F. and various operating pressures between 200 and 1200 Psig of the cold separator were contemplated, using a raw gas feed stream having a richness of 5 GPM. In this example, it was desirable to have all of the C.sub.3 report to the sales gas stream and the majority of the C.sub.4 and C.sub.5 report to the HGL stream. Both the conventional prior art process (Conventional) and the process of the present invention (Enhanced) were investigated. The graph in FIG. 6 shows that the cold separator can be operated at a much broader range of pressures in the present invention (Enhanced) for recovery of 100% of the C.sub.5 and C.sub.6+ hydrocarbons (in the HGL product) than when using the conventional refrigeration process (Conventional). In particular, between 400 Psig and 1000 Psig, 100% of C.sub.5 was recovered in the present invention (Enhanced) whereas only between 80% and 92% of the C.sub.5 was recovered using the conventional refrigeration process (Prior Art).

[0068] FIG. 6 also shows that, when the pressure exceeds 500 Psig, that butane recovery in the Present Invention exceeds that of the conventional refrigeration process (Prior Art). In fact, the maximum butane recovery for the Present Invention (Enhanced) is about 84% and occurs at about 800 Psig, as compared to the Prior Art (Conventional) butane recovery at about 69%.

[0069] The present invention provides the potential to produce a sales gas stream meeting pipeline specifications at a higher pressure when compared to the Prior Art (Conventional). This may be an advantage when the gas transmission pipeline operates at pressures between 900 and 1200 Psig.

Example 8

[0070] In Example 8, a gas feed stream having a richness of 5 GPM was used. The cold separator was operated at 600 Psi and various operating temperatures of the cold separator were tested using both the conventional prior art process (Conventional) and the process of the present invention (Enhanced). The butane recovery (%) versus refrigeration load (HP/MMscf) was determined. It can be seen in graph shown in FIG. 7 that when using and operating the cold separator over a range of temperatures, the refrigeration load for the present invention (Enhanced) becomes less than the refrigeration load for the conventional refrigeration process (Conventional) for equivalent butane recoveries (in the sales gas) greater than about 62%. In particular, at a target of 80% butane recovery in the sales gas, the refrigeration load for the process of the present invention (Enhanced) was only about 23 HP/MMscf of raw gas feed, as compared to about 32 HP/MMscf when using conventional refrigeration process (Conventional).

[0071] The scope of the claims should not be limited by the preferred embodiments set forth in the examples, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.