AIRBORNE LASER SCANNER

Abstract

The invention relates to an airborne laser scanner configured to be arranged on an aircraft for surveying a target along a flight path, wherein the airborne laser scanner comprises an emitter configured for emitting a plurality of consecutive laser pulses towards the ground surface, at least one optical element configured for deflecting the laser pulses along pulse paths towards the target, a motor configured for moving the optical element to cause a periodically repeating movement of the pulse paths, a receiver configured for receiving the laser pulses backscattered from the target, and a computer configured for controlling the emitter, the motor, and the receiver, determining directions of the pulse paths, and triggering the emitter to emit the laser pulses.

Claims

1. An airborne laser scanner configured to be arranged on an aircraft for surveying a target along a flight path, wherein the airborne laser scanner comprises an emitter configured for emitting a plurality of consecutive laser pulses towards the ground surface, at least one optical element configured for deflecting the laser pulses along pulse paths towards the target, a motor configured for moving the optical element to cause a periodically repeating movement of the pulse paths, a receiver configured for receiving the laser pulses backscattered from the target, and a computer configured for controlling the emitter, the motor, and the receiver, determining directions of the pulse paths, and triggering the emitter to emit the laser pulses with a first pulse space variation, wherein the computer is further configured for triggering the emitter to emit the laser pulses with a second pulse space variation overlaying with the first pulse space variation, wherein according to the second pulse space variation, pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during a first period of the periodically repeating movement are at least in part modified relative to pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during any of subsequent periods of the periodically repeating movement.

2. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the second pulse space variation has a digital pattern.

3. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the second pulse space variation has an analogue pattern.

4. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the second pulse space variation follows a sinusoidal pattern, a linear zig-zag pattern, a wave pattern, a saw tooth pattern, a step pattern, or any combination of the patterns.

5. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein according to the second pulse space variation, pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during the first period are differing by a constant value from the pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during any of the subsequent periods.

6. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein according to the second pulse space variation, pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during the first period are differing by a proportional value from the pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during any of the subsequent periods.

7. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein according to the second pulse space variation, pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during the first period are differing by a random value from the pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during any of the subsequent periods.

8. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein according to the second pulse space variation, pulse spaces emitted during the subsequent periods are switching between at least two different frequency profiles.

9. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the periodically repeating movement is a zig-zag movement, a circular movement, or a stroke movement.

10. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the optical element is a plane mirror, a wedge lens, a prism, or a polygon mirror.

11. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the optical element is configured for deflecting the laser pulses backscattered from the target towards the receiver.

12. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the motor is configured for rotating the optical element around a first rotation axis, resulting in a cone-shaped laser pulse emission pattern, wherein the airborne laser scanner further comprises an angle encoder configured for providing positions of the optical element.

13. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the motor is configured for oscillating the optical element around an oscillation axis, resulting in a fan-shaped laser pulse emission pattern

14. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 13, comprising an oscillation sensor configured for providing positions of the optical element.

15. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 13, wherein the computer is configured for determining the directions of the pulse paths based on the provided positions of the optical element.

16. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the computer is configured for determining a current of the motor and the directions of the pulse paths based on the current.

17. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the motor is configured for rotating the optical element around a second rotation axis, and the optical element is embodied as a polygon mirror, the deflection by the rotating polygon mirror resulting in a fan-shaped laser pulse emission pattern

18. The airborne laser scanner according to claim 1, wherein the optical element is arranged relative to the emitter in such a way that the optical element deflects the laser pulses in a defined constant angle relative to the rotation axis or relative to the oscillation axis.

19. A computer-implemented method for reducing ranging bias and measurement point drop-outs caused by internal and near range reflections in an airborne laser scanner arranged on an aircraft for surveying a target along a flight path, comprising triggering an emitter of the airborne laser scanner to emit laser pulses with a first pulse space variation, deflecting the laser pulses with at least one optical element of the airborne laser scanner along pulse paths towards the target, moving the optical element with a motor of the airborne laser scanner to cause a periodically repeating movement of the pulse paths, wherein the emitter is triggered to emit the laser pulses further with a second pulse space variation overlaying with the first pulse space variation, wherein according to the second pulse space variation, pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during a first period of the periodically repeating movement are at least in part modified relative to pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during any of subsequent periods of the periodically repeating movement, receiving the laser pulses backscattered from the target with a receiver of the airborne laser scanner, determining directions of the pulse paths.

20. The computer-implemented method according to claim 19, wherein according to the second pulse space variation, pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during the first period are differing from the pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during any of the subsequent periods by one of: a constant value, a proportional value, and a random value.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0029] By way of example only, preferred embodiments of the invention will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying figures, wherein:

[0030] FIG. 1 schematically shows an aircraft carrying an airborne laser scanner according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0031] FIGS. 2-4 schematically show airborne laser scanners according to embodiments of the invention;

[0032] FIGS. 5-9 schematically show scan patterns used in airborne laser scanners according to embodiments of the invention;

[0033] FIGS. 10 and 11 schematically show errors (dropouts) in the scan result of prior art airborne laser scanners;

[0034] FIG. 12 schematically shows an exemplary first pulse spacing variation used in airborne laser scanners according to embodiments of the invention;

[0035] FIG. 13 schematically shows an exemplary second pulse spacing variation used in airborne laser scanners according to embodiments of the invention;

[0036] FIG. 14 schematically shows an exemplary resulting overall pulse spacing variation used in airborne laser scanners according to embodiments of the invention; and

[0037] FIGS. 15-17 schematically show the blind moments of a receiver of an airborne laser scanner due to the emission of transmission pulses.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0038] FIG. 1 shows an aircraft 1 flying over a ground surface as target 2 while following a flight path 3 (trajectory). The aircraft carries an airborne laser scanner 4 which emits laser pulses 5 which may be used to generate a point cloud 6 of the swath (scanning area) of the aircraft 1. The laser pulse emission pattern is symbolically shown as a pyramid, however, in reality it rather appears as a cone or fan.

[0039] FIGS. 2-4 show three exemplary operating principles that could be applied in an airborne laser scanner according to the invention. FIG. 2 shows the airborne laser scanner 7 comprising a computer 8, an emitter 9 and a receiver 10, which in this example are combined in one unit, but may however also be arranged separately. A prism 11, in particular a wedge prism, as optical element is in operative connection with a motor 12, such that it is rotatable around the rotation axis A1. The movement of the optical element 11 induced by the motor 12 may be a continuous or a partial rotatory movement. A continuous rotatory movement is to be understood as at least one full 360° rotation, in particular a permanent sequence of full rotations, and a partial rotatory movement is to be understood as a rotation, in particular a rotation of less than 360°, which is reversed in a defined scheme. For example, after a 180° rotation, the motor changes the rotational direction and goes back the 180°, and so on.

[0040] During the movement of the optical element 11, the emitter 9 emits a plurality of consecutive laser pulses T1 towards the target 2. The direction of the pulse path is altered by the movement of the optical element 11. The pulses R1 backscattered from the target 2 are received by the receiver 10. The computer 8 is connected to the emitter 9, the receiver 10, and the motor 12, and it is configured for controlling these components.

[0041] In general, the computer of some embodiments may additionally be configured for determining a distance from the airborne laser scanner to the ground surface based on the emitted and received laser pulses, i.e. by calculating the time of flight (TOF). Since the direction in which the optical element is deflecting the pulses, i.e. the direction of the pulse path, is known and/or determinable (e.g. by an angle encoder detecting the rotatory position of the motor), the determined TOF distance value can be assigned to the direction (e.g. at least one coordinate such as angle(s)) of the current pulse path at a specific measurement time.

[0042] Particularly, a three-dimensional point cloud based on these data (3D point measurements) can be generated by an external computer in a post-processing. In this case, the internal computer 8 is merely configured to collect the data. The data may comprise time stamps of pulse transmission and pulse reception or distance values already calculated by means of said stamps, and transmission/reception direction. Alternatively, the computer 8 can be configured for generating said point cloud, in particular in real-time.

[0043] A second exemplary embodiment 13 is shown in FIG. 3, wherein the construction is similar to the one shown in FIG. 2 but the optical element is a mirror 14 instead of a prism. Also, the motor 15 does not perform full rotations as positioning, but performs oscillations around an oscillation axis A2. In particular, the oscillation axis runs along (or: parallel to) the surface of the mirror 14. The oscillation axis A2 can however also run elsewhere. In particular, the oscillation can also be understood as a partial rotatory movement.

[0044] By the oscillating positioning of the mirror 14, the transmitted laser pulses T2 are deflected towards the target and back (R2) along a pulse path. Said pulse path pivots laterally to the flight path. As in the former example, the scanner 13 has an emitter/receiver unit (16,17) and a computer 18.

[0045] FIG. 4 shows a third example. The scanner 19 has a computer 20, an emitter 21, and a receiver 22. The optical element in this case is a polygon mirror 23 which is rotated by a motor 24 around the axis A3. As a result, the pulse paths are stroking always from one side to another. While the polygon mirror 23 would continuously rotate, every time an edge of the mirror reaches the transmission beam T3, the deflection rapidly jumps back to starting point and the pulse paths begins the drift anew. The echoes R3 come back to the receiver 22 following the same scheme.

[0046] FIGS. 5-7 show the resulting sampling patterns, i.e. each black point symbolizes a measured 3D point, or respectively, a spot on the target 2 reflecting a measuring pulse. The scan 24 in FIG. 5 is an outcome of the configuration of the scanner 7 in FIG. 2. This spiral-shaped pattern comes from the conical pulse path movement caused by the rotating wedge prism 11 and the flight movement. The pattern 25 shown in FIG. 6 follows the construction of the scanner 13 in FIG. 3. This zig-zag shape results from the forth-and-back movement of the mirror 14 and the flight movement. The strokes 26 shown in FIG. 7 are caused by a configuration 19 such as presented with FIG. 4.

[0047] FIGS. 8 and 9 show respective scan patterns 27 and 28 with an improved point distribution as disclosed in EP 3517998 A1. Scanners with a lateral return movement of the deflecting optical element, as is the case with the scanners 7 and 13, accumulate too many points at the edge of the swath and too few points in the center (roughly: nadir) due to the nature of the pulse path movement. This is not the case for the scanner 19 as the point distribution here is already even. EP 3517998 A1 improved the scanners in that the pulse rate shall depend on by how much the direction of the pulse path momentarily shows in to the side (relative to the direction of the flight path). That is, the more the pulse path would come to the edge of the scanning area, the pulse rate would drop to pick up less points, and in particular, the more the pulse path would come to the center (flight path), the pulse rate may go up or at least to its nominal value. This will also be shown with FIG. 12 below.

[0048] The present disclosure is aiming at solving a problem that is involved with all of the above presented examples.

[0049] FIGS. 10 and 11 symbolically show 3D point clouds of a respective scanning area with systematic deficiencies in the point cloud. These deficiencies are likely to occur when the aircraft carrying the airborne laser scanner is flying over a ground surface that has little to no profile, e.g. parking lots, sports fields, streets, flat rooftops, lakes, agricultural fields, and so on. Since the scanner is transmitting the laser pulses so rapidly that, before a reflected pulse arrives back at the scanner, at least the next pulse (in particular a plurality of next pulses) is already emitted. This technique is also termed multiple pulses in the air (MPIA). Now when a return pulse reaches the receiver at the same time a transmission pulse is emitted, the receiver is not capable of sampling the return pulse. For the time of emission of a new pulse, the receiver is “blind” (as well as a short period after the emission due to internal reflexes). Therefore, some points cannot be captured.

[0050] For example, the scan 29 in FIG. 10 has a line 30 in the center, i.e. essentially on the flight path, which line 30 is symbolizing a lack of measurement points. This scan has been recorded e.g. with a setup according to FIG. 3 or FIG. 4, i.e. the scanning pattern looks like is shown in FIG. 6/9, or respectively, FIG. 7. These dropouts happen always in the same lateral position and propagate along the flight direction. The reason for this is that the aircraft is flying at a constant height and the ground is flat as explained above. Now with the mentioned scanning pattern (zig-zag: FIGS. 6 and 9; strokes: FIG. 7), the outer points are further away from the aircraft, and the points in the center have the shortest distance. Starting from the center line (flight path) both ways sideward, the distance increases symmetrically. So in FIG. 10 it happens to be the center line where the points are in a certain distance to the aircraft where the scanner cannot catch the points as described above. FIG. 11 shows an example of a point cloud 31 with two gap lines 32 and 33, as they are both in such a distance to the aircraft, where the above dropout phenomenon happens.

[0051] In case of a scanner setup as shown in FIG. 2 generating a 3D point cloud with a scanning pattern as shown in FIG. 5, the points on the circle have (substantially) the same distance to the laser scanner. This fact makes the scanner especially vulnerable to the dropouts because if the aircraft is flying in said critical height, not just some but all points are affected. A swift look ahead onto FIGS. 15-17 shows how this happens: The first graph in FIG. 15 shows the transmission pulses T with their intensity I on the y-axis plotted over the time t on the x-axis. The pulses 34 are sent out with a constant pulse rate. The second graph in FIG. 16 shows reflection pulses R.sub.int with their intensity I on the y-axis plotted over the time t on the x-axis. These reflections are caused by optical elements in the interior of the scanner and they end up at the receiver very close to the time period of the transmission. These reflections elongate the time window of blindness 34 of the receiver as it is close to impossible to distinguish these reflection from any real reception pulses from the target. FIG. 17 shows a third graph with reception pulses R.sub.ext coming back from the target with their intensity I on the y-axis plotted over the time t on the x-axis. They fall into the blindness window 34 and can therefore not be sampled by the receiver.

[0052] A pulse space variation with the triangle signal as depicted in FIG. 12, as explained above, can avoid the total black-out in case of the cone-shaped scanner. According to this variation, the pulse rate goes up when the pulse paths approach nadir and goes down when the pulse paths approach the lateral edge region of the scanning area. However, due to the symmetrical distribution of the pulse rate over a cross-section of the scanning area, this will end up with the same problems as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 for the scanner configuration as per FIG. 2, and it will not solve (only reduce, at most) the problem for the scanners as per FIGS. 3 and 4. It is noted that this pulse space variation is just an example and is not necessary to apply the invention. Specifically, when the present disclosure mentions a “first pulse space variation”, this does not necessarily refer to said triangle signal.

[0053] The disclosed embodiments massively improve the above presented problem so that dropout points are reduced and/or distributed in a way that they do not catch the eye of the viewer as they are not schematic as shown with FIGS. 10 and 11.

[0054] The presented problem is solved by triggering the emitter to emit the laser pulses with a second pulse space variation overlaying with (or in other words: superimposing) a first pulse space variation, wherein according to the second pulse space variation, pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during a first period of a periodically repeating movement are at least in part modified relative to pulse spaces between those pulses emitted during any of subsequent periods of the periodically repeating movement. FIG. 13 shows a potential second pulse space variation superimposed onto the triangle signal from FIG. 12. FIG. 14 then shows the resulting pulse space variation or pulse rate variation.

[0055] A periodically repeating movement of the pulse path is, applied to the examples presented above, a 360° circle of the conical scan (FIG. 5), two lines (forth-and-back) of the zig-zag pattern (FIG. 6), and respectively, one line of the stroke pattern (FIG. 7). In the embodiment of FIG. 14, the first period of such a periodically repeating movement is characterized by a pulse space variation that differs from the next period of the periodically repeating movement. The boarders between the periods are indicated here with the dashed lines. If the aircraft flies in a critical height over a near-flat surface, then this modification achieves a “dithering” of the dropouts that make the dropouts unrecognizable in the 3D point cloud. Of course, further embodiments may have a different second pulse space variation than that of FIG. 13 (flip-flop between two factors) to even further advance the survey quality.

[0056] In addition, the disclosed embodiments provide a reduction of the ranging bias. The glass returns (internal reflections) can bias the ground returns if they are very close in temporal space. The inventive solution can also reduce the possibility of glass return overlapping with ground returns and therefore there is less so called close terrain noise (ranging bias) because the ground layer is less likely overlapping with the glass or near range returns.

[0057] Although the invention is illustrated above, partly with reference to some preferred embodiments, it must be understood that numerous modifications and combinations of different features of the embodiments can be made. All of these modifications lie within the scope of the appended claims.