FLOW RESTRICTORS FOR USE ON BURNERS
20250043952 ยท 2025-02-06
Inventors
Cpc classification
F23D2900/14641
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23D14/22
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23D14/32
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F23D14/22
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C01B3/36
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F23D14/32
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A flow restrictor for use on burners used for combusting gases includes a central disk and opposing cylindrical members extending from opposing sides of the central disk. The central disk includes a central portion having multiple inner openings extending through the central disk and a peripheral portion having multiple outer openings extending through the central disk. Each of the opposing cylindrical members surrounds the central portion and the inner openings of the central disk. The peripheral portion and the outer openings of the central disk are disposed outside of the cylindrical members. Each of the cylindrical members is designed to be attached to an open end of a pipe of a burner.
Claims
1. A flow restrictor, comprising: a central disk that includes a central portion having a plurality of inner openings extending through the central disk and a peripheral portion having a plurality of outer openings extending through the central disk; and first and second cylindrical members extending from opposing sides of the central disk, wherein the first and second cylindrical members each surround the central portion and the inner openings of the central disk, and wherein the peripheral portion and the outer openings of the central disk are disposed outside of the first and second cylindrical members.
2. The flow restrictor of claim 1, wherein the central disk has a generally circular shape.
3. The flow restrictor of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of inner openings has a generally circular shape.
4. The flow restrictor of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of outer openings has a generally circular shape.
5. The flow restrictor of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of inner openings has a diameter, wherein the diameter of each respective one of the plurality of inner openings is approximately the same size.
6. The flow restrictor of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of outer openings has a diameter, wherein the diameter of each respective one of the plurality of outer openings is approximately the same size.
7. The flow restrictor of claim 1, wherein the plurality of inner openings comprises a number of inner openings in a range of 2 to 64 inner openings, and wherein each respective one of the plurality of inner openings has a diameter in a range of approximately 0.0625 inches to 0.5 inches.
8. The flow restrictor of claim 1, wherein the plurality of outer openings comprises a number of outer openings in a range of 2 to 64 outer openings, and wherein each respective one of the plurality of outer openings has a diameter in a range of approximately 0.5 inches to 0.75 inches.
9. The flow restrictor of claim 1, wherein the first cylindrical member is configured to attach to an open end of a first pipe, and wherein the second cylindrical member is configured to attach to an open end of a second pipe.
10. The flow restrictor of claim 9, wherein the first cylindrical member is configured to receive the open end of the first pipe within the first cylindrical member, and wherein the second cylindrical member is configured to receive the open end of the second pipe within the second cylindrical member.
11. The flow restrictor of claim 10, wherein the first cylindrical member has an inner diameter that is approximately equal to an outer diameter of the first pipe, and wherein the second cylindrical member has an inner diameter that is approximately equal to an outer diameter of the second pipe.
12. The flow restrictor of claim 9, wherein the inner openings are configured to restrict flow of a fluid through a flow path from the first pipe to the second pipe.
13. The flow restrictor of claim 1, wherein each of the first and second cylindrical members has a threaded inner surface.
14. The flow restrictor of claim 13, wherein the first cylindrical member is configured to attach to an open end of a first pipe, wherein the second cylindrical member is configured to attach to an open end of a second pipe, wherein the end of the first pipe has a threaded outer surface, wherein the end of the second pipe has a threaded outer surface, wherein the threaded inner surface of the first cylindrical member is compatible with the threaded outer surface of the end of the first pipe, and wherein the threaded inner surface of the second cylindrical member is compatible with the threaded outer surface of the end of the second pipe.
15. The flow restrictor of claim 14, wherein the inner openings are configured to restrict flow of a fluid through a flow path from the first pipe to the second pipe.
16. The flow restrictor of claim 1, wherein the flow restrictor is configured to be mounted onto a burner, wherein the inner openings are configured to restrict flow of a first fluid through a first flow path of the burner, and wherein the outer openings are configured to restrict flow of a second fluid through a second flow path of the burner.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following figures. Matching reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the figures, which are not necessarily drawn to scale.
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] Disclosed herein are burners suitable for use in producing synthesis gas (syngas). In some embodiments, the burners comprise diffusion burners that each include multiple burner units that are used in parallel. In such a case, the reactant flow speed and the reaction length required to complete the reaction are reduced as compared to systems comprising a single burner unit. Each of the burner units can include concentric pipes, including an inner pipe configured to deliver fuel and an outer pipe configured to deliver oxygen. In some embodiments, a flow restrictor is provided for each burner unit that controls both the flow of fuel and oxygen through their respective pipes. When such flow restrictors are used, the flow of reactants through the burner units is more balanced and more even flames can be produced.
[0018] In the following disclosure, various specific embodiments are described. It is to be understood that those embodiments are example implementations of the disclosed inventions and that alternative embodiments are possible. Such alternative embodiments include hybrid embodiments that combine aspects of different embodiments. All such embodiments are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure.
[0019]
[0020] As described below, each burner unit can be configured as a diffusion burner unit in which the fuel and oxygen are mixed after exiting their respective flow pipes. In some embodiments, those flow pipes can be concentrically arranged with each other. For example, inner pipes of each burner unit can be used to deliver the fuel while the outer pipes of each burner unit (that surround the inner supply pipes) can be used to deliver the oxygen. The exit ends of the fuel and oxygen flow pipes (not visible in
[0021] During operation of the syngas production system, a reaction is initiated when the reactants exit the burner units and enter the combustion chamber 11, which can be heated to a temperature above the autoignition temperature for the mixture (e.g., 600 C.). When the temperature in the combustion chamber 11 is above the autoignition temperature, the mixture automatically ignites and reacts to form a mixture of hydrogen (H.sub.2), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2), water (H.sub.2O), and unreacted methane (CH.sub.4) (assuming natural gas and oxygen as reactants). Accordingly, unlike conventional burners, the burner 10 does not require, and therefore does not include, any ignition devices, such as spark generators. The combustion chamber 11 is lined with insulation to contain the heat released from the reaction and to provide a hot surface for the initiation of the reaction. The burner geometry and operating conditions are selected such that a desired H.sub.2: CO molar ratio of syngas can be achieved. As an example, this molar ratio may be in the range of approximately 1.4 to 3.0.
[0022] Notably, steam can be mixed with the fuel to produce humidified fuel that gives the syngas product elevated partial pressures of H.sub.2O for subsequent reforming reactions. To achieve this, fuel and steam can be mixed upstream of the burner 10 in a static mixer. The steam temperature can be controlled such that the temperature of the humidified fuel is above the dew point, thus ensuring a single phase flowing into the burner. The inventors have determined that introducing steam into the syngas production system ensures stability and reproducibility in the reaction. In some embodiments, steam at temperatures in the range of approximately 150 C. to 350 C. can be delivered to a static mixer and can be used at ratios of 0 to 1.8 of steam to fuel mass flow with stable overall combustion performance (see
[0023] Testing was performed to evaluate a single pipe-in-pipe burner having a diameter ratio of 2.0, a volume flow ratio of 0.6, and combustion chamber pressure of approximately 2 psig. Tables 1 and 2 present the results of this testing. The water data in Table 1 was obtained by mass-balance calculations and not actual measurements. The results confirm that the addition of steam to the fuel delivered to the burner resulted in increased production of CO.sub.2, decreased production of CO, and an increase in the amount of unreacted methane as compared to the case without steam. Significantly, the syngas ratio also increased as the amount of steam increased.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Outlet gas composition including water. steam to fuel mass flow CO.sub.2 CO H.sub.2 CH.sub.4 H.sub.2O ratio (mol %) (mol %) (mol %) (mol %) (mol %) H.sub.2:CO 0 4.6 24.0 33.1 15.6 22.5 1.38 0.19 5.1 21.9 31.8 13.7 27.5 1.45 0.38 5.3 19.7 29.1 13.5 32.4 1.48 0.57 5.5 17.9 27.2 13.0 36.4 1.52
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Outlet gas composition excluding water. steam to fuel mass flow CO.sub.2 CO H.sub.2 CH.sub.4 ratio (mol %) (mol %) (mol %) (mol %) H.sub.2:CO 0 6.0 31.0 42.8 20.2 1.38 0.19 7.0 29.3 39.9 23.8 1.45 0.38 7.9 29.1 43.0 19.9 1.48 0.57 8.6 28.1 42.8 20.5 1.52
[0024] A flame was created using spark ignition for the cases listed in Tables 1 and 2. The heat of the flame provided the necessary temperature to sustain the reaction at the burner outlet as the fuel and oxygen continuously flowed. However, it was observed in some of the experiments that the reaction may continue even if the flame is extinguished due to the temperature of the chamber walls being above 600 C. Therefore, it is possible to start and sustain the partial oxidation reaction by introducing the mixture of fuel and oxygen into a combustion chamber that is at or above the autoignition temperature. Any method of heating the chamber walls to the required temperature can be used for this purpose. In this manner, the burner can operate without the need for a spark ignition system, which is commonly used in industry, and even operate without a flame present.
[0025]
[0026] With reference first to
[0027] Extending from the first plenum chamber 12 toward the second plenum chamber 16 are multiple hollow inner supply pipes 20 that are in fluid communication with the interior space of the first plenum chamber. Accordingly, humidified fuel delivered to the first plenum chamber 12 via the first inlet 14 can flow into and through each of the inner supply pipes 20. In the illustrated example, there are eight such pipes 20, such that the burner 10 comprises eight separate diffusion burner units 22 from which humidified fuel and oxygen are output. It is noted, however, that a greater or a lesser number of burner units 22 can be used, if desired. For example, anywhere from 2 to 16 burner units 22 can be provided. As is apparent from
[0028] With further reference to
[0029] With such a configuration, humidified fuel can flow through the inner supply pipes 20 while oxygen simultaneously flows through the outer supply pipes 24 (and around the inner supply pipes) in the same direction. In some embodiments, the diameter ratio for the outer supply pipes 24 to the inner supply pipes 20 is in the range of approximately 1.5:1 to 2:1, and the oxygen-to-fuel volume flow ratio for each burner unit 22 is in the range of approximately 0.55 to 0.65. Ratios in these ranges result in flow velocities that create instability in the flow of the reactants that enhances mixing and results in a CO-rich syngas product. In some embodiments, the flow ratio further results in partial consumption of the fuel but complete consumption of the oxygen (i.e., a partial oxidation reaction). By way of example, each inner supply pipe 20 can have an outer diameter of approximately 1 to 6 inches (e.g., 2 inches) and each outer supply pipe 24 can have an outer diameter of approximately 2 to 12 inches (e.g., 4 inches). Each of the inner and outer supply pipes 20, 24 can be made of steel.
[0030] As depicted in
[0031] With reference back to
[0032] With reference again to
[0033] The above-described configuration of the first plenum chamber 12, inner supply pipes 20, flow restrictors 26, and inner outlet pipes 44 results in a first (fuel) flow path that enables humidified fuel delivered to the first plenum chamber to flow through the inner supply pipes, through the inner openings 36 of the flow restrictors (
[0034] The flow restrictors 26 play a significant role in producing the desired syngas. Specifically, the flow restrictors 26 build pressure within both the fuel and oxygen flow paths upstream of the flow restrictors (i.e., within the inner and outer supply pipes 20, 24) that balances the flow of the humidified fuel and oxygen across the various burner units 22. The size and number of the openings 36, 38 formed within the flow restrictors 26 can be varied to obtain a desired pressure and, therefore, the desired balancing. As an example, the five inner openings 36 can each have a diameter of approximately 5/16 in., and the eight outer openings 38 can each have a diameter of approximately in. The appropriate sizes and numbers of the inner openings 36 and the outer openings 38 can be determined on a case-by-case basis with consideration of the particular needs of the application. Generally speaking, however, the number of inner openings 36 can range from approximately 2 to 64 and their diameters can range from approximately 1/16 (0.0625) to (0.5) inches, and the number of outer openings 38 can range from approximately 2 to 64 and their diameters can range from approximately (0.5) to (0.75) inches. Computer simulations have shown that the flow rate varies less than 3% from burner unit 22 to burner unit 22 with these dimensions and the flow restrictor geometry shown in
[0035] With reference next to
[0036] The above-described burner 10 provides benefits that are not provided by conventional burners that only include a single burner unit. By operating multiple burner units 22 in parallel, the overall flow speed and hence reaction length (i.e., the length required to complete the reaction) is reduced as compared to when a single burner unit is used. Computer simulations have predicted the reaction length for the burner 10 is approximately 9 feet for a flow rate of 3,382 lb/hr for fuel and 3,624 lb/hr for oxygen (volume flow ratio of 0.6) through the burner. Notably, the reaction length for a single burner unit at this flow rate would be over 60 ft.
[0037] An experimental gas and steam supply system was designed to perform testing of a burner having a configuration similar to the burner 10 described above.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Outlet gas composition including water. steam to fuel mass flow CO.sub.2 CO H.sub.2 CH.sub.4 H.sub.2O ratio (mol %) (mol %) (mol %) (mol %) (mol %) H.sub.2:CO 0 4.0 27.7 51.8 6.5 10.1 1.87