BI-LAYER IRON COATING OF LIGHTWEIGHT METALLIC SUBSTRATE
20170204920 ยท 2017-07-20
Assignee
Inventors
- Dominique POIRIER (Boucherville, CA)
- Eric Irissou (Longueuil, CA)
- Jean-Gabriel Legoux (Repentigny, CA)
- Danick GALLANT (Saguenay, CA)
Cpc classification
Y10T428/12757
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C23C28/028
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F16D65/12
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B32B15/011
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y10T428/12993
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F16D69/027
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16D65/125
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y10T428/12736
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
B32B15/01
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F16D2069/005
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y10T428/12972
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F16D65/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y10T428/12458
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C23C4/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C23C28/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y10T428/26
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C23C30/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y10T428/12979
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F16D65/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16D65/127
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C23C28/325
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y10T428/24967
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
B32B15/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C23C4/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B32B15/012
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F16D2250/0046
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B32B15/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F16D69/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16D69/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16D2200/003
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C23C4/137
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F16D2200/0021
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16D2069/003
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y10T428/12958
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y10T428/2495
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
F16D65/12
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C23C4/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B32B15/01
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C23C28/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B32B15/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A wear resistant friction coating (WRFC) can be applied on a lightweight metallic substrate, by applying a cold gas dynamic spray bond coat containing more iron than any other single element directly onto a surface of the substrate, and thermal spraying the WRFC coating over the bond coat to a thickness of at least 500 m. Corrosion resistance, adhesion, thermal cycling resistance, and wear resistance have been demonstrated.
Claims
1. A mechanical part with a structural member composed of a lightweight metallic substrate bearing a wear surface for friction contact with a second part, the wear surface having the following structure: a dense metallic bond coat with a microstructure consistent with formation by cold gas dynamic spray, bonded directly to the structural member; and a wear resistant friction coating (WRFC) provided over the bond coat having a microstructure consistent with formation by thermal spray, the WRFC being bonded directly to the bond coat, or to an intermediate layer, wherein the wear surface is composed of more iron (Fe) than any other element by mass, and has a thickness greater than 300 m.
2. The mechanical part of claim 1 wherein the lightweight metallic substrate includes a metallic phase having 60 wt. % of one or more light structural metals like Al, or Mg, with optionally one or more of the following: Si, Cu, Li, Zn, Fe, Ni, Cr, Mn, Ti.
3. The mechanical part of claim 2 wherein the metallic phase is Al, or an alloy of Al.
4. The mechanical part of claim 2 wherein the lightweight metallic substrate is a metal matrix composite material, with the metallic phase being its metal matrix.
5. The mechanical part of claim 1 wherein the wear surface is composed of: at least 40 wt. % Fe; more steel by weight than any other feedstock material; more steel by weight than any other feedstock material, the steel comprising Fe and C, and one or more of Ni, Cr, Mn, Al, Mo; one or more cold gas dynamic spray layers and one or more thermal spray layers; or one or more cold gas dynamic spray layers covered by one or more thermal spray layers.
6. A method for depositing a wear resistant friction coating (WRFC) on a lightweight metallic substrate, the method comprising: exposing a prepared surface on the substrate; applying a cold gas dynamic spray bond coat containing more iron than any other single element directly onto the prepared surface; and thermal spraying the WRFC coating over the bond coat to a thickness of at least 300 m above the substrate.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein thermal spraying comprises operating a thermal spray (TS) torch and a TS feedstock supply to feed coating material to a plume of the thermal spray torch, for at least partial melting, and acceleration of the material, toward the bond coat.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein: the thermal spray torch is one of a wire-arc, plasma, HVOF, warm spray, and flame spray apparatus; the plume is an arc, and the TS feedstock supply is a wire feed; or the TS feedstock consists of at least 40 wt. % of iron
9. The method of claim 6 wherein applying the cold gas dynamic spray bond coat comprises operating one of a cold spray (CS), warm spray and an HVOF spray torch to accelerate a CS feedstock to provide the coating by high deformation collision of the CS feedstock substantially as a solid.
10. The method of claim 6 wherein the WRFC is applied directly on the bond coat.
11. The method of claim 6 further comprising applying one or more intermediate coats on the bond coat prior to thermal spraying the WRFC.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein: each intermediate coat is applied by thermal spray, or cold gas dynamic spray; every layer is produced by at least one cold gas dynamic spray coating followed by at least one thermal spray coating, the last at least one thermal spray coating being the WRFC; or applying one or more intermediate coats comprises varying a thermal spray or cold gas dynamic spray parameter during the coating to produce an intermediate coat having a graded composition, microstructure, or density.
13. The method of claim 6 wherein applying the bond coat comprises varying a spray parameter during the coating to produce a bond coat having a graded composition, microstructure, or density.
14. The method of claim 6 wherein exposing a prepared surface on the substrate does not involve peening, blasting, etching, or abrading the surface.
15. A brake comprising a structural piece composed of an Al or Al alloy having a surface bearing bi-layer coating with an exposed a wear resistant friction coating (WRFC), wherein a dense metallic bond coat composed of more iron than any other element by mass underlies the WRFC, the bond coat having a microstructure consistent with formation by cold gas dynamic spray.
16. The mechanical part of claim 1 wherein the bond coat: is composed of at least 40 wt. % Fe; is graded, in that a composition, microstructure, or density varies as a function of distance from the part; is at least 200 m thick; or is composed of a different steel than the WRFC.
17. The mechanical part of claim 1 wherein the WRFC: is composed of at least 40 wt. % Fe; has a microstructure consistent with formation by a wire-arc thermal spray torch; is at least 100 m thick; is at least 250 m thick; is at least 500 m thick; is less than 5 mm thick; the WRFC is bonded directly to the bond coat; the WRFC is bonded to the bond coat with at least one intermediate coat provided between the bond coat and WRFC, and each intermediate coat has a microstructure consistent with application by a thermal spray torch, or by cold gas dynamic spray; or the WRFC is bonded to the bond coat with at least one intermediate coat provided between the bond coat and WRFC, and the at least one intermediate coat is graded, in that a composition, microstructure, or density varies as a function of distance from the part.
18. The brake of claim 15 wherein the bi-layer coating is composed of: at least 40 wt. % Fe; more steel by weight than any other feedstock material, the steel comprising Fe and C, and one or more of Ni, Cr, Mn, Al, Mo; one or more cold gas dynamic spray layers and one or more thermal spray layers; or one or more cold gas dynamic spray layers covered by one or more thermal spray layers.
19. The brake of claim 15 wherein the bond coat: is composed of at least 40 wt. % Fe; is graded, in that a composition, microstructure, or density varies as a function of distance from the part; is at least 200 m thick; or is composed of a different steel than the WRFC.
20. The brake of claim 15 wherein the WRFC: is composed of at least 40 wt. % Fe; has a microstructure consistent with formation by a wire-arc thermal spray torch; is at least 100 m thick; is at least 250 m thick; is at least 500 m thick; is less than 5 mm thick; is bonded directly to the bond coat; is bonded to the bond coat with at least one intermediate coat provided between the bond coat and WRFC, and each intermediate coat has a microstructure consistent with application by a thermal spray torch, or by cold gas dynamic spray; or is bonded to the bond coat with at least one intermediate coat provided between the bond coat and WRFC, and the at least one intermediate coat is graded, in that a composition, microstructure, or density varies as a function of distance from the part.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0027] In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, embodiments thereof will now be described in detail by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0028] FIGS. la,b,c are schematic illustrations of three embodiments of parts having a wear surface in accordance with the present invention, respectively showing a duplex, a triplex and a graded bond layer embodiment;
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0035] Herein a method of producing a wear surface is provided by teaching how a wear resistant friction coating (WRFC) can be adhered to lightweight metallic substrates. Herein a lightweight metallic substrate refers to a substrate composed of a substantial amount of a light, structural metal, such as Al or Mg, and expressly more of the light, structural metal than all heavy metal in the metal phase of the substrate. The metal phase refers to the whole substrate less any composite reinforcement constituents. The substantial amount would be at least 25 molar %, and is typically more than 35 molar %, or more than 40 molar %, and, for some materials, may necessarily be more than 50 molar %, but includes all materials classified as Al alloys, or Mg alloys, and all metal matrix composites of any of those alloys. Typically the metal phase itself will be at least 65 wt. % of one or more light structural metals or alloys. Herein a metal alloy does not include less than 30 wt. % of the specified metal, and does not have a single metal species in higher concentration than the specified metal.
[0036]
[0037] Typically, WRFCs must also resist corrosion, and may be exposed to thermal cycling. To resist the high surface temperature achieved during braking, at a reasonable cost, an iron-based coating is preferred, although the WRFC 12 need not be principally composed of iron, even if the duplex coating as a whole is composed of more iron than any other element by mass. That is, WRFCs composed of more expensive tungsten carbide (for example), can be used where commercially viable. Suitable corrosion resistance is favored by providing at least 40 wt. % iron (preferably in the unoxidized state), measured by atomic emission spectroscopy (preferably in the unoxidized state). Advantageously, various steels have excellent tribological properties for producing WRFCs, and are economical. Accordingly, steel based WRFCs are preferred and the coating may include, or consist only of steel, such as the following grades of steel: stainless steel 200, 300 or 400 series. The WRFC 12 has a microstructure consistent with thermal spray deposition, such as by spraying with a plasma torch, or a combustion flame, sprayed by a wire-based feedstock or a powder feedstock. As such the WRFC will have inter-lamellar voids, oxides and features showing the buildup of solidified droplets (splats) in thin layers, from unmelted or partially melted particles. Oxides present in steel-based WRFCs are formed naturally during the spraying if performed in air, and imbue hardness to the WRFC needed for wear resistance.
[0038] A thickness of the WRFC 12 is selected for the use of the wear surface. A wear rate during an expected usage regime is chosen to provide an expected service life for the wear surface. For some materials the coating may be 50 m or less, but in general applying a uniform coat quickly would result in a thickness of at least 100 m, and more often, thicker still (such as 150-1500 m, or more preferably 200-900 m)
[0039] The bond coat 10 is provided for adhering the WRFC 12 to the lightweight metallic substrate 11. The bond coat 10 has a microstructure consistent with cold (gas dynamic) spray deposition: it has a high density, with low micro-porosity from inter-lamellar features; and is composed of elongated splats originating from the deformation and deposition of solid/unmelted powder particles. The bond coat 10 preferably has a thickness that is sufficient to protect the substrate from oxidation and improves corrosion resistance. A thickness of 200 m was found sufficient to accomplish this, and it is believed that a thickness less than this will not be sufficient for most steels.
[0040] The lightweight metallic substrate 11 may be formed of Al, Al alloy, Mg, Mg alloy, or a metal matrix composite with a metallic phase of Al or Al alloy, or Mg or Mg alloy. A metal matrix composite may include reinforcements in the form of another metal, cermet, or a ceramic (such as a metal oxide, nitride, boride, or carbide) at least in the vicinity of the wear coating. Naturally the substrate 11 may be on a part composed of other materials in other areas. Specifically the substrate 11 may be composed of an Al-titania MMC as described in Applicants previously identified co-pending application, which may be formed in a manner that provides a substantially metallic Al surface, even if the body contains more rutile titania than Al. Preferably the part has a strength and stiffness suitable for use in high temperature, or thermal cycling environments, at moderately high pressure.
[0041] Together the bond coat and WRFC preferably have a thickness of at least 300 m, and more preferably 400 m, 450 m, 500 m, or more. Typically the whole bi-layer coating would have a thickness of less than 5 mm, and more commonly less than 2.5 mm or 2 mm. A minimum thickness is preferred to thermally shield the substrate, and an excessive thickness is generally avoided to avoid long deposition times and cost.
[0042] The embodiment of
[0043] While the foregoing assumed that different torches are required for the bond coat and WRFC, it will be appreciated that a convergence between thermal spray (particularly HVOF-type) torches and cold gas dynamic spray equipment is ongoing. High Velocity Air Fuel (HVAF) and warm spray variants of HVOF (with higher melting point powder feedstock) are bridging the gap between what were previously considered distinct spray processes. Accordingly HVOF, HVAF, and warm spray torches are all considered herein cold gas dynamic spray torches to the extent that they produce dense, oxide-free coatings like cold spray torches. Within the next 20 years, it is entirely plausible that a single torch could produce both an effective cold gas dynamic sprayed bond coat, or reasonable approximation thereto, and a thermal sprayed WRFC, especially if higher and lower melting point iron-based feedstocks are used. What would generally be required is a torch that is operable to impart sufficient velocity to a spray jet to produce the bond coat with the desired density, preferably with limited oxidation, and without melting the feedstock, and a thermal spray process that melted the feedstock to increase an oxidation of the as-sprayed steel coating.
[0044]
[0045] There are a wide variety of parts upon which wear surfaces may be desired or required: brakes of all sizes, shapes and types, clutches, pushers, and rolling bearer pads, for example. While the parts may be of tools for gripping, like vices or clamps, it may be especially valuable to meet demand for light tools subject to local thermal shocks (caused by interaction of the surface with another, or by an external heat source, for example). These can have a very wide variety of shapes, but most frequently plates, disks, and drums are used, and pads of various shapes can be applied on a wider range of parts, such as calipers.
[0046]
[0047] In step 23, the process optionally involves applying an intermediate coat. The intermediate coat may be composed of metals and their oxides, and is preferably deposited by thermal spray or a vacuum-based coating deposition technique, such as a vacuum deposition method.
[0048] Finally, in step 24, a WRFC 12 is applied, to provide the wear surface with a desired friction surface. Other types of material particles, such as carbides (WC, CrC, SiC) or oxides (SiO.sub.2, Al.sub.2O.sub.3, TiO.sub.2) may be used, or admixed with a steel powder to improve wear resistance, deposition efficiency, or adhesion properties while maintaining reasonable cost.
[0049] The bond coat can advantageously serve to fix the WRFC to the substrate 11 for use in a braking environment, even if the coating is 1 mm thick or more.
EXAMPLES
[0050]
[0051] Such coatings were produced according to the following process: machined A356 Al pucks were used for the trials. The cold gas dynamic spray bond coat was sprayed directly on the Al pucks (no surface roughness preparation was performed, and no cleaning was performed, as the pucks were recently machined) in two layers with a Kinetiks 4000 cold gas dynamic spray system obtained from CGT GMBH, to reach a thickness of about 300 m. The cold gas dynamic spray process used these spray parameters: powder=FE101 from Praxair; powder feedrate=20 g/min; N.sub.2 gas temperature=700 C.; N.sub.2 gas pressure=40 bar; stand-off distance=8 cm; robot traverse speed of 300 mm/s; and step size of 2 mm. The WRFC coat, of about 500 m thickness, was produced with a Sulzer Metco SmartArc following these spray parameters: wire=80T from Praxair, current=100A; air pressure=4.14 bar; stand-off=15.2 cm; robot traverse speed of 750 mm/s and step size of 6 mm.
[0052] The evaluation of different duplex coatings (varying coating stainless steel composition, thickness, and spraying parameters) has shown excellent thermal cycling resistance of the duplex coatings.
[0053] In this thermal cycling rig, coated samples are successively heated by a YAG laser and cooled down by air flow through the motion of a sample holder. Three samples are attached to the sample holder. Once the first sample is heated, it is moved to the cooling down region while the next sample is being heated. All process devices are thus stationary and enclosed in a chamber equipped with interlock doors and tinted windows for laser safe handling. Process monitoring and control is performed with Labview software (National Instrument, Austin, USA) from a computer outside the chamber. A specimen was first heated from the coated surface with a 2 kW CW YAG laser (Rofin Sinar, Hamburg, Germany) whose power was adjusted to 1300 W to obtain the desired heating rate of 50-55 C./s. After a heating time of 4s, the specimen was then quickly mechanically moved to the cooling zone where compressed air was directed to the coated surface. The 4s heating resulted in surface temperatures that never exceeded 500 C. Natural cooling occurred in the standby zone and as the sample holder location was reinitialized to start a new cycle.
[0054] The duplex coatings provided a sliding wear resistance equivalent to, or better than those usually obtained on cast iron, and substantially superior to bulk SS 304, or cold gas dynamic sprayed SS 316 coatings. The coefficient of friction is steady at about 0.45, which is typical of cast iron discs.
[0055]
[0056] Wear rate of the test disks was expressed in volume loss per sliding distance, mm.sup.3/m, and was obtained through weight loss measurement and estimated material density. The scale used for weight loss measurement is accurate to 0.01 mg.
[0057] Exposure of coatings to a cyclic corrosion test revealed that the duplex coating offers excellent corrosion resistance compared with (only) arc sprayed WRFCs. In order to simulate the effect of the most corrosive conditions encountered by brake disks, a laboratory cyclic corrosion test inspired by standard ISO 14993 was used to determine corrosion resistance. One cycle of the cyclic corrosion procedure employed was defined as follows: Step 1. Salt-spray with 5% NaCl at 343 C. (100% RH) (for 3 hours); Step 2. Drying at 596 C. and 277% RH (for 5 hours); Step 3. Wetting at 487 C. and >95% RH (for 4 hours).
[0058] The arc sprayed WRFCs debonded after 24 cycles, with spalling initiated well before this, whereas the duplex coating withstood 120 cycles, the whole test duration. The duplex coating gave no indication of spalling or debonding after the cyclic corrosion test, and showed minimal traces of corrosion.
[0059] Finally the duplex coating was subjected to a scale dynamometer to simulate actual braking conditions. The friction tests included a variety of stops with different characteristics (length, deceleration rate, etc.) to simulate various braking conditions as well as thermal shocks. The following data was taken at 50 Hz during each stop; internal aluminum temperature (via thermocouple mounted 0.5 mm below the coated surface of the disc); sample contact surface temperature (via an infrared sensor); force applied to the pads; the resultant torque on the pads; and the speed of the disc. The coatings were found to exhibit very stable wear characteristics with a steady constant coefficient of friction of about 0.35. Those results are consistent with the pin-on-disc laboratory wear testing. Using typical brake materials for the pins, pin-on-disc testing confirmed that, the coefficient of friction, measured at 0.42 in that case, varied by 10%, over 600 min (after initial running-in).
[0060]
[0061] Other advantages and applications that are inherent to the structure are obvious to one skilled in the art. The embodiments are described herein illustratively and are not meant to limit the scope of the invention as claimed. Variations of the foregoing embodiments will be evident to a person of ordinary skill and are intended by the inventor to be encompassed by the following claims.