Single high dose of MVA induces a protective immune response in neonates and infants
09707291 · 2017-07-18
Assignee
Inventors
- Cédric Cheminay (Munich, DE)
- Ariane Volkmann (Andechs, DE)
- Paul Chaplin (Gafelfing, DE)
- Mark Suter (Lucerne, CH)
Cpc classification
C12N2710/24134
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61K2039/55
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C12N2710/24034
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y02A50/30
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C12N2710/24043
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61K2039/545
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C12N2760/18434
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C12N2710/24143
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
A61K39/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The invention relates to compositions and methods for inducing a protective immune response against a poxvirus in a human neonate or infant of less than 6 months of age. The invention encompasses administering a single high dose of an MVA to a human neonate or infant of less than 6 months of age, wherein the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against a poxvirus in the human neonate or infant.
Claims
1. A method for inducing a protective immune response against a poxvirus in a human neonate or infant of less than 6 months of age comprising administering a dose of at least 10.sup.8 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID.sub.50) of a modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) to a human neonate, wherein the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against a poxvirus in the human neonate prior to 6 months of age in the absence of a second administration of the MVA.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration is administered to a human infant of less than 2 months of age.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration is administered to a human neonate.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration is administered to a human neonate within 72 hours after birth.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against an orthopoxvirus.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against a Vaccinia virus.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against smallpox.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising administering one or more boosting administrations of the MVA.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the MVA is a recombinant MVA.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the administration induces T- and B-cell responses against a heterologous antigen encoded by the recombinant MVA.
11. A method for inducing a protective immune response against a poxvirus in a human neonate or infant comprising administering a dose of at least 10.sup.8 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID.sub.50) of a modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) to a human neonate or infant of less than 6 months of age, wherein the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against a poxvirus in the human neonate or infant within 2 weeks of the administration.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the administration is administered to a human infant of less than 2 months of age.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein the administration is administered to a human neonate.
14. The method of claim 11, wherein the administration is administered to a human neonate within 72 hours after birth.
15. The method of claim 11, wherein the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against an orthopoxvirus.
16. The method of claim 11, wherein the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against a Vaccinia virus.
17. The method of claim 11, wherein the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against smallpox.
18. The method of claim 11, further comprising administering one or more boosting administrations of the MVA.
19. The method of claim 11, wherein the MVA is a recombinant MVA.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the administration induces T- and B-cell responses against a heterologous antigen encoded by the recombinant MVA.
21. The method of claim 1, wherein MVA is MVA-BN.
22. The method of claim 11, wherein MVA is MVA-BN.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(10) The threat of a potential bioterrorism attack or emergence of zoonotic poxviruses in the human population has prompted several efforts to develop a safer third generation smallpox vaccine suitable for at-risk populations contraindicated for ACAM2000, the smallpox vaccine currently licensed in the USA. However, at-risk populations include not only immuno-compromised individuals such as HIV patients or individuals suffering from skin disorders like atopic dermatitis, but also children less than one year old due to the immaturity of their immune system. MVA-BN with its excellent safety profile as a replication-deficient live virus has previously been shown to enhance broad-spectrum resistance to viral infections in the first week of life in mice. Franchini, J. Immunol. 172, 6304-6312 (2004).
(11) Nave neonates are considered difficult if not impossible to protect against fatal infections shortly after birth. However, by increasing the vaccination dose to a dose of 110.sup.8 TCID.sub.50 of Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA), it was demonstrated that a single immunization of mice at birth induced fully functional T- and B-cell responses that rapidly conferred full protection against a lethal orthopoxvirus challenge. Surprisingly, protection is induced within 2 weeks and is mainly T-cell-dependent. Furthermore, persisting immunological T-cell memory and neutralizing antibodies were obtained with this single vaccination. Thus, MVA administered as early as at birth induces immediate and long-term protection against fatal diseases and appears attractive as a platform for early childhood vaccines.
(12) A single vaccination of mice with MVA at birth not only induces innate, but also adaptive immune responses including effector and long term memory T-cells as well as neutralizing antibody responses. Importantly, within two weeks after vaccination the adaptive immune response fully protects mice against a lethal intranasal challenge with ECTV.
(13) Here, it is demonstrated that an important role for T-cells exists in newborn mice. When immunized with a low dose of 210.sup.6 TCID.sub.50 of MVA, a strong cytotoxic T-cell response was induced, which led to partial protection from ECTV challenge in the absence of detectable antibody responses. Complete protection was only achieved after vaccination with a high dose of 110.sup.8 TCID.sub.50 of MVA, a dose that also induces B-cell responses. This was confirmed in T11MT transgenic mice, in which partial protection showed that B-cells are also required in order to achieve complete protection after a single vaccination with MVA at birth.
(14) The invention encompasses compositions and methods for inducing a protective immune response against a poxvirus in a human neonate or infant. In one embodiment, the invention encompasses administering a dose of at least 10.sup.8 TCID.sub.50 of an MVA to a human neonate or infant. The MVA can be administered to a human neonate or infant prior to the full maturation of the immune system.
(15) The invention further encompasses MVA for use in inducing a protective immune response against a poxvirus in a human neonate or infant.
(16) The invention also encompasses MVAs for use in vaccinating a human neonate or infant. The invention also encompasses the use of MVAs as vaccines for treating a human neonate or infant and the use of MVAs in the preparation of vaccines or medicaments for treating or vaccinating a human neonate or infant.
(17) Human Neonates and Infants
(18) Within the context of this invention, the term human neonate refers to a newborn human less than 1 month of age and the term human infant refers to a human between birth and 1 year of age. Preferably, the human neonate is less than 4 weeks of age, less than 3 weeks of age, less than 2 weeks of age, or less than 1 week of age. More preferably, the human neonate is less than 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 days of age.
(19) In one embodiment, a dose of MVA is administered to a human neonate. In various embodiments, a dose of MVA is administered to a human neonate of less than 4 weeks of age, less than 3 weeks of age, less than 2 weeks of age, or less than 1 week of age. In various embodiments, a dose of MVA is administered to a human neonate of less than 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 days of age. In preferred embodiments, a dose of MVA is administered to a human neonate within 3, 2, or 1 days of birth.
(20) In one embodiment, a dose of MVA is administered to a human infant of less than 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 months of age. In various embodiments, a dose of MVA is administered to a human infant of less than 8 weeks of age, less than 7 weeks of age, less than 6 weeks of age, or less than 5 weeks of age. In preferred embodiments, a dose of MVA is administered to a human infant of less than 2 months of age.
(21) Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) Viruses
(22) The invention encompasses any and all MVA viruses. Preferred MVA viruses include MVA variant strains such as MVA-BN (deposited at the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures, Vaccine Research and Production Laboratory, Public Health Laboratory Service, Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JG, United Kingdom (ECACC) on Aug. 30, 2000, under Accession No. V00083008), MVA-575 (deposited at ECACC on Dec. 7, 2000, under Accession No. V00120707), and MVA-572 (deposited at ECACC on Jan. 27, 1994 under Accession No. V94012707). Derivatives of the deposited strain are also preferred.
(23) Preferably, the MVA has the capability of reproductive replication in vitro in chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) or other avian cell lines or in vivo in embryonated eggs, but no capability of reproductive replication in human cells in which MVA 575 or MVA 572 can reproductively replicate. Most preferably, the MVA has no capability of reproductive replication in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT, the human embryo kidney cell line 293 (also referred to as HEK293), the human bone osteosarcoma cell line 143B, and the human cervix adenocarcinoma cell line HeLa.
(24) In preferred embodiments, the Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) virus is characterized by having the capability of reproductive replication in vitro in chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) and by being more attenuated than MVA-575 in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT, in the human bone osteosarcoma cell line 143B, and in the human cervix adenocarcinoma cell line HeLa. Preferably, the MVA virus is capable of an amplification ratio of greater than 500 in CEF cells. The amplification ratio of a virus is the ratio of virus produced from an infected cell (Output) to the amount originally used to infect the cells in the first place (Input). A ratio of 1 between Output and Input defines an amplification status wherein the amount of virus produced from the infected cells is the same as the amount initially used to infect the cells.
(25) Recombinant MVAs
(26) The invention encompasses recombinant MVA viruses generated with any and all MVA viruses. In one embodiment, the recombinant MVA virus is a recombinant MVA-BN virus. The recombinant MVA virus comprises at least one heterologous nucleic acid sequence. In the context of this invention, the term heterologous nucleic acid sequence refers to a nucleic acid sequence that is not naturally found in the MVA.
(27) Preferably, the heterologous nucleic acid sequence is a sequence coding for at least one antigen, antigenic epitope, and/or a therapeutic compound. The antigenic epitopes and/or the antigens can be antigenic epitopes and/or antigens of an infectious agent. The infectious agents can be viruses, fungi, pathogenic unicellular eukaryotic or prokaryotic organisms, and parasitic organisms. In some embodiments, the infectious agent is a virus selected from any of the following: Rotavirus, Rubella virus, Poliovirus, Influenza virus, Flavivirus (particularly Dengue virus and Yellow Fever virus), Paramyxovirus (particularly measles virus, mumps virus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)), Hepatitis virus (particularly Hepatitis A, B, and C viruses), Human immunodeficiency virus (particularly HIV-1), Filovirus (particularly Ebola virus and Marburg virus) or from other viruses causing hemorrhagic fever. In some embodiments, the infectious agent is a bacterium selected from any of the following: Bacillus anthracis, meningococcus, pneumococcus, Haemophilus influenza, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Clostridium tetani, Burkholderia, Francisella tularensis, Coxiella burnetii, or Bordetella pertussis.
(28) Any antigen, including those that induce a T-cell response, can be expressed by the recombinant MVA of the invention. Viral, bacterial, fungal, and cancer antigens are preferred. Preferred antigens are antigens of any of the viruses or bacteria described above. HIV-1 antigens, Dengue virus antigens, anthrax antigens, measles virus antigens, influenza virus antigens, picornavirus antigens, coronavirus antigens and respiratory syncytial virus antigens are particularly preferred antigens. Preferably, the antigen is a foreign antigen or neoantigen. Within the context of this invention, the term neoantigen refers to an antigen not naturally expressed by the poxviral vector.
(29) In some embodiments, the administration induces T- and/or B-cell responses against a heterologous antigen encoded by the recombinant MVA. The T-cell response can be an effector and/or long term memory T-cell response. The B-cell response can be a neutralizing antibody response.
(30) Administration
(31) The invention encompasses administration of a dose of an MVA to a human neonate or infant via any route. Preferred routes of administration include subcutaneous (s.c.), intradermal (i.d.), intramuscular (i.m.), in bone marrow (i.bm.) or intravenous (i.v.) injection, oral administration and mucosal administration, especially intranasal administration, or inhalation. The quantity to be administered (dosage) depends on the subject to be treated, considering among other things the condition of the patient, the state of the individual's immune system, the route of administration and the size of the host.
(32) The invention further encompasses MVAs for use as a pharmaceutical composition or vaccine for vaccinating a human neonate or infant, the use of MVAs as pharmaceutical compositions or vaccines for treating a human neonate or infant, and the use of MVAs in the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions or vaccines or medicaments for treating or vaccinating a human neonate or infant.
(33) The pharmaceutical composition, vaccine or medicament can generally include one or more auxiliary substances, such as pharmaceutically acceptable and/or approved carriers, additives, antibiotics, preservatives, adjuvants, diluents and/or stabilizers. Such auxiliary substances can be water, saline, glycerol, ethanol, oil, wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering substances, or the like. Suitable carriers are typically large, slowly metabolized molecules such as proteins, polysaccharides, polylactic acids, polyglycolic acids, polymeric amino acids, amino acid copolymers, lipid aggregates, or the like.
(34) For the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions or vaccines or medicaments, the MVA according to the invention can be converted into a physiologically acceptable form. This can be done based on experience in the preparation of poxvirus vaccines used for vaccination against smallpox (as described by Stickl et al. 1974). The purified virus can be stored at 20 C., or 80 C., frozen in a liquid. Preferably, the virus has a titer of 510.sup.8 TCID50/ml, and can be formulated in a buffered solution, for example, in 10 mM Tris, 140 mM NaCl, at pH 7.4.
(35) The virus formulation can contain additional additives such as mannitol, dextran, sugar, glycine, lactose or polyvinylpyrrolidone or other auxiliary substances, such as antioxidants or inert gas, stabilizers or recombinant proteins (e.g., human serum albumin, or HSA) suitable for in vivo administration.
(36) Alternatively, the vaccine can be produced by stepwise freeze-drying of the virus in a formulation. For example, 10.sup.8 particles of the virus can be lyophilized in 100 l to 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in the presence of 2% peptone and 1% HSA in an ampoule, preferably a glass ampoule. The glass ampoule is then sealed and can be stored between 4 C. and room temperature for several months. However, as long as no need exists the ampoule is stored preferably at temperatures below 20 C.
(37) For vaccination or therapy, the virus can administered either systemically or locally, i.e., parenterally, subcutaneously, intravenously, intramuscularly, intranasally, or by any other path of administration known to the skilled practitioner.
(38) Dose
(39) The invention encompasses a dose of at least 10.sup.8 TCID.sub.50 of an MVA administered to a human neonate or infant. Preferably, the dose is at least 10.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 210.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 310.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 410.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 510.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 610.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 710.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 810.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 910.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, or 10.sup.9 TCID.sub.50 of an MVA. A particularly preferred dose is 210.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 310.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 410.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 510.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 610.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 710.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 810.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 910.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, or 10.sup.9 TCID.sub.50 of an MVA. Especially preferred is a dose of 10.sup.8 TCID.sub.50.
(40) The human neonate or infant can be vaccinated with a single administration of the MVA in the absence of any additional (boosting) administrations. In other embodiments, one or more boosting administrations are administered. In one embodiment, a second administration is given four weeks to eight weeks after the first vaccination administration. Preferably, the second administration is given at 2, 4, 6, or 8 weeks after the first administration. In other embodiments, a third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, or additional administration is given.
(41) The boosting administration can be administered to increase immune response when the initial response decays or to further increase the initial response. Thus, in some embodiments a boosting administration is provided to augment or reestablish a desired level of immune response.
(42) The time between the first and second administrations and between an administration and a subsequent administration can vary. In one embodiment, the time between administrations is two to six weeks. In various embodiments, the time between administrations is at least 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 30, or 52 weeks. In various embodiments, the time between administrations is at least 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, or 48 months. In various embodiments, the time between administrations is at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 years.
(43) Protective Immune Response
(44) The invention encompasses the induction of a protective immune response against a poxvirus by administration of a dose of an MVA to a human neonate or infant. Preferably the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against the poxvirus in the human neonate or infant prior to 6 months of age. Most preferably, the immune response is induced in the absence of a second administration of the MVA. Within the context of this invention, the phrase the immune response is induced in the absence of a second administration of the MVA means that the immune response does not depend on the administration of a second (i.e., boosting) dose of the MVA. The immune response is induced by the first administration. Thus, within the context of this invention, the phrase the immune response is induced in the absence of a second administration of the MVA does not mean that a second administration is not administered; it only means that a second administration is not required to induce the protective immune response. In some embodiments, a second or subsequent administration is administered. The second or subsequent administration can increase the level of the immune response and/or the longevity of the immune response.
(45) The protective immune response can protect at least 75%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% of the neonates or infants to which the MVA is administered from death and/or disease symptoms.
(46) Preferably, the protective immune response is against a poxvirus, particularly an orthopoxvirus. In some embodiments, the poxvirus is a vaccinia virus or a variola virus. Most preferably, the protective immune response is against smallpox.
(47) Preferably, the protective immune response is induced in the human neonate or infant prior to 6 months of age. More preferably, the protective immune response is induced in the human neonate or infant prior to 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 months of age. Most preferably, the protective immune response is induced in the human neonate or infant within 4, 3, or 2 weeks of the administration.
(48) Compositions
(49) The invention encompasses pharmaceutical compositions and vaccines comprising at least 10.sup.8 TCID.sub.50 of an MVA for administration to an infant or neonate to induce a protective immune response. Preferably, the composition comprises 10.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 210.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 310.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 410.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 510.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 610.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 710.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 810.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 910.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, or 10.sup.9 TCID.sub.50 of an MVA. A particularly preferred dose is 210.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 310.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 410.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 510.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 610.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 710.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 810.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, 910.sup.8 TCID.sub.50, or 10.sup.9 TCID.sub.50 of an MVA. Especially preferred is a dose of 10.sup.8 TCID.sub.50.
EXAMPLES
(50) The following examples will further illustrate the present invention. It will be well understood by a person skilled in the art that the provided examples in no way may be interpreted in a way that limits the applicability of the technology provided by the present invention to this examples.
Example 1: Mice
(51) Time-mated C57BL/6J and BALB/c female mice were obtained from Harlan Winkelmann, whereas B-cell receptor/T11MT transgenic, activation-induced cytidine deaminase-deficient (AID-deficient), MHC class I/2m-deficient, T-cell receptor deficient and FLT3-deficient mice on a C57BL/6 background were obtained from the animal facilities of the University Zurich or Bavarian Nordic-Munich. Litters were of mixed gender. Pups were weaned at 4 weeks of age.
Example 2: Vaccines and Challenge Virus
(52) The MVA used was MVA-BN, developed by Bavarian Nordic and deposited at ECACC under Accession No. V00083008 (see above). The recombinant MVA-measles vaccine MVA-mBN85B encodes 3 measles genes: the Fusion-, Hemagglutinin- and Nucleo-proteins. The gene sequences were derived from RNA of measles strain Khartoum SUD/34.97 (Genotype B3). Both viruses were propagated and titrated on primary chicken embryo fibroblasts that were prepared from 11-day-old embryonated, pathogen-free hen eggs (Charles River, Mass., USA) and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium. ECTV strain Moscow was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) under Accession No. VR-1372, and was propagated and titered on Vero C1008 cells (ECACC Accession No. 85020206), maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FCS without antibiotics. All viruses were purified through a sucrose cushion.
Example 3: Immunization and Challenge
(53) Mice were immunized subcutaneously within 6-24 hours after birth with 50 l of viral suspension. 8-weeks old animals were used for the comparison of newborns to adults (i.e., adults were 8-weeks old). 110.sup.8 TCID.sub.50 MVA or MVA-mBN85B was applied, except for some animals that received either a lower dose (210.sup.6 TCID.sub.50) or 110.sup.8 TCID.sub.50 of UV-inactivated MVA. Samuelsson et al., J. Clin. Invest. 118, 1776-1784 (2008). Control animals were treated with TRIS-buffered saline, pH 7.7. For MVA-mBN85B, mice were immunized twice three weeks apart. For immunogenicity studies, animals were bled and sacrificed at different time points and spleens were processed for flow cytometric analyses.
(54) For ECTV challenge, mice were anaesthetized with ketamine/xylamine and virus was applied intranasally in a volume of 25 l, except for 2-week old animals, which received virus in a volume of 12.5 l. For each age group and mice strain, the optimal dose inducing 100% death within 2 weeks and with approximately a viral load of 8 Log.sub.10 pfu in necropsied lung was determined. For 29-day old mice, the optimal dose was 110.sup.4 TCID.sub.50 (4 times the LD.sub.50 determined for adult C57BL/6J mice; Samuelsson et al., J. Clin. Invest 118, 1776-1784 (2008)), except for the FLT3-deficient and TCR-deficient mice. In these highly susceptible mice, 110.sup.3 TCID.sub.50 of ECTV was sufficient. For 2-week- and 7 week-old mice, the challenge dose was 110.sup.2 TCID.sub.50 and 310.sup.4 TCID.sub.50, respectively. After challenge, weight loss sickness and death were monitored daily for 21 days. 5 to 7 pups were included in each group and data are representative of two or three experiments.
Example 4: ECTV Plaque Assay
(55) ECTV plaque assay was used to determine the viral load in necropsied lung. Lungs were homogenized and titered on Vero C1008 cells using four-fold serial dilutions starting at 1:100. After 3 days of incubation and a crystal violet staining (Sigma Aldrich), the titer was calculated from the first dilution step that revealed a mean plaque number 150.
Example 5: ELISA
(56) Vaccinia-specific serum IgG titers were measured by direct ELISA as described previously. Garza et al., Vaccine 27, 5496-5504 (2009). Briefly, 96-well plates were coated overnight with MVA antigen. Test sera were titrated using twofold serial dilutions starting at 1:50. A sheep anti-mouse IgG-HRP (AbD Serotec) was used as detection antibody. The antibody titers were calculated by linear regression and defined as the serum dilution that resulted in an optical density of 0.30 at OD.sub.450. Measles-specific serum IgG titers were measured with the Enzygnost ELISA kit (Dade Behring), but using the sheep anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase.
Example 6: Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT) Assay
(57) Vaccinia-based PRNT assay was performed as described in Garza et al. Vaccine 27, 5496-5504 (2009). Briefly, heat-inactivated sera were serially diluted and incubated with vaccinia virus Western Reserve (Advanced Biotechnologies Inc.). After incubation the mixtures were allowed to adsorb on Vero cells for 70 minutes. Then, overlay medium was added and plates were incubated for 24 hours. After staining with Crystal Violet, the neutralizing titer was determined as the serum dilution which was able to neutralize 50% of the mature virus.
Example 7: Flow Cytometry and ELISpot
(58) After erythrolysis, a part of the splenocytes were incubated 5 hours with or without the B8R-peptide (Tscharke et al., J. Exp. Med. 201, 95-104 (2005)) (5 g/ml B8R.sub.20-27), Coring) in the presence of GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences). Cells were then stained with anti-CD8+-eFluor-450, anti-CD4+-eFluor-780, anti-CD44-FITC, anti-CD62L-PercP-Cy5.5, anti-CD127-APC, anti-IFN-PE-Cy7 (all eBioscience) and anti-Granzyme B-PE (Invitrogen). Intracellular staining was performed after fixation/permeabilization (BD Cytofix/Cytoperm, BD Biosciences). Flow cytometric analysis was performed using an LSR II (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed with FlowJo (Tree Star). The rest of the splenocytes were stimulated 20 hours with or without B8R/vaccinia- or N/measles-specific (Halassy et al., Vaccine 24, 185-194 (2006); Bergen et al., PLoS one 5(4):e10297, 2010) peptides (5 g/ml; aa 335-345; N) and IFN-secreting cells were detected by ELISpot assay (BD Biosciences). The stimulation index was obtained by subtracting the number of unspecific spots from non-stimulated cells from the number of spots obtained with the specific stimulation.
Example 8: Neutralizing Antibodies as Well as Effector and Long-Term Memory T-Cells are Induced by MVA in Newborn Mice
(59) Newborn mice were immunized at birth with a high dose (lx 10.sup.8 TCID.sub.50) or low dose (210.sup.8 TCID.sub.50) of MVA used previously in newborn mice. Franchini et al., J. Immunol. 172, 6304-6312 (2004). Vaccinia-specific IgG antibody responses were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) performed 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 weeks post-immunization (
(60) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Vaccinia-specific neutralizing antibody responses Age Treat- weeks post group ment immunization 1 2 3 4 7 Newborn TBS seroconversion.sup.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Titer.sup.b 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 10.sup.6 seroconversion.sup.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TCID.sub.50 Titer.sup.b 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 MVA 1 10.sup.8 seroconversion.sup.a 0.0 16.7 33.3 66.7 66.7 TCID.sub.50 Titer.sup.b 1.0 1.3 2.6 11.6 5.7 MVA Adult 1 10.sup.8 seroconversion.sup.a 33.3 100.0 66.7 100.0 00.0 TCID.sub.50 Titer.sup.b 1.8 18.9 11.5 163.7 37.9 MVA .sup.ain percent .sup.bgeometric mean titer
(61) The B-cell response induced by a single immunization with MVA-BN at birth was still detectable 16 weeks after immunization (
Example 9: MVA Induces Protection Against a Lethal ECTV Challenge in Two Week Old Mice
(62) In order to investigate the functionality of the T- and B-cell responses induced by MVA immunization at birth even further, the intranasal ECTV challenge model was adapted to young mice. Four weeks post-neonatal immunizations with a low or high dose of MVA, animals were challenged via the intranasal route with 110.sup.4 TCID.sub.50 ECTV. All control mice treated with placebo (Tris-buffered saline, TBS pH 7.7; 1.21 mg/ml TRIS-(hydroxymethyl)-amino-methane, 8.18 mg/ml sodium chloride) died 9 to 12 days post-challenge (
Example 10: Protection Against Lethal ECTV Challenge Depends on the Adaptive Immune Response
(63) It has previously been shown that injection of MVA at birth boosts early development of pDC and leukocyte precursors via an increase of FLT3 ligand (FLT3-L), which led to an increased resistance to viral infections in the first week of life. Franchini et al., J. Immunol. 172, 6304-6312 (2004); Vollstedt et al., Eur. J. Immunol. 36, 1231-1240 (2006). Therefore, the role of FLT3-L in the protection against lethal ECTV challenge was investigated using FLT3-L knockout mice. These mice have about tenfold less pDC than C57BL/6 wild type mice and are unable to up-regulate pDC. In addition, these mice lack other cell types of the innate immune system. Vollstedt et al., Eur. J. Immunol. 36, 1231-1240 (2006). FLT3-L knockout mice were immunized with MVA at birth and challenged 4 weeks later with 110.sup.3 TCID.sub.50 ECTV. All vaccinated mice survived the infection (
(64) The role of the adaptive immune response in the protection afforded by neonatal immunization was investigated. T-cell receptor (TCR) knockout mice are devoid of T-cells and are also unable to mount a vaccinia-specific B-cell response due to the absence of T-helper cells. TCR knockout mice vaccinated with MVA at birth succumbed 11 to 12 days after an intranasal challenge with 110.sup.3 TCID.sub.50 ECTV, arguing for the requirement of an adaptive immune response for protection (
Example 11: Both T- and B-Cell Responses are Required for Complete Protection
(65) The role of cellular versus humoral immune responses in protection was examined. The fact that 2-week-old mice were protected at a time when T-cell responses but hardly any antibodies could be detected led to the notion of a dominant role for T-cells in protection of newborn mice. Indeed, in the absence of CD8+ T-cells in 2m knockout mice, immunization with MVA did not induce protection, (
Example 12: Recombinant MVA as Vector for Vaccines Against Childhood Diseases
(66) The fact that a single immunization with MVA at birth induced short and long term protective immunity suggests an opportunity for its use as viral vector to develop childhood vaccines. Therefore the potential of recombinant MVA as vaccine against childhood disease was analyzed using MVA-Measles in the neonate mouse model. MVA-Measles encodes three different measles virus proteins within the MVA backbone: the hemagglutinin- and fusion-proteins involved in binding and fusion with the host cell, as well as the nucleocapsid-protein associated with the viral single strand RNA. As seen for neonatal vaccination with MVA, recombinant MVA-Measles also elicited strong vaccinia-specific B- and T-cell responses after immunization at birth and boost 3 weeks later. More importantly, also Measles-specific B- and T-cell responses were readily detectable (