Method for printing an ink jet marking on a surface

Abstract

A method for printing an ink jet marking on a non-wetting surface for liquid ink, includes forming at least a first drop of solidified ink on the surface, by ejecting, by means of a printhead, a first drop of liquid ink at a first given ejection velocity and with a first given volume, and depositing, on at least one portion of said first drop of solidified ink, at least a second drop of ink having a second volume VOL2, by ejecting, by means of a printhead, a second drop of liquid ink at an ejection velocity.

Claims

1. A method for printing an inkjet marking on a surface that cannot be wetted by the ink in liquid form, that is to say a surface on which the drop of liquid ink forms a static contact angle greater than or equal to 90, comprising the following steps: (a) forming at least a first drop of solidified ink E1 on the surface, by ejecting, by means of a printhead, a first drop of liquid ink at a first given ejection velocity V1 and with a first given volume VOL1, and (b) depositing, on at least one portion of said first drop of solidified ink, at least a second drop of ink E2 having a second volume VOL2, by ejecting, by means of a printhead, a second drop of liquid ink at an ejection velocity V2, the first velocity V1 being sufficient to flatten in step a) said first drop of ink on said surface and give said first drop of solidified ink E1 a flattening contact area equivalent to the contact area obtained at equilibrium for a drop of the same liquid ink with the same volume VOL1 present on a wettable surface, which is a surface on which the drop of liquid ink forms a static contact angle of less than or equal to 80.

2. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the first ejection velocity V1 of the drop of ink E1 being such that if several drops of ink E1 having a volume VOL1 of 6 pl are deposited at the first ejection velocity V1, the mean diameter of the solidified drops deposited is, seen from above, greater than 39 m.

3. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the surface being a surface of non-zero curvature.

4. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the marking being printed on the surface of an optical article.

5. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the volume VOL1 of the drop of ink E1 being defined such that the drop of ink E1 is less than the critical volume for which the drop of ink E1 bursts or rebounds when it is deposited at the first velocity V1 on the non-wettable surface.

6. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the surface that cannot be wetted by the ink in liquid form being such that the drops of liquid ink have a static contact angle with the surface of greater than or equal to 90.

7. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the drops of ink E1 and the drops of ink E2 respectively having a first volume VOL1 and a second volume VOL2 such that VOL1/VOL2<1.

8. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the first volume VOL1 being within the range [5 pl to 15 pl].

9. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the second volume VOL2 being within the range [20 pl to 50 pl].

10. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, said surface being a hydrophobic surface having a static contact angle with water of greater than or equal to 80.

11. A method for printing an inkjet marking on a surface that cannot be wetted by said ink in liquid form, comprising a repetition of the steps of the method as claimed in claim 1, thus with the formation of several first drops of ink E1 solidified on the surface and the deposition of several second drops of ink E2 on top of said first drops E1.

12. The method for printing an inkjet marking on a surface that cannot be wetted by said ink in liquid form as claimed in claim 11, several of the solidified first drops of ink E1 being formed on the surface in a first inkjet printing pass and the second drops of ink E2 deposited on top of said first drops of ink E1 being deposited in a second inkjet printing pass, after the first inkjet printing pass.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the first velocity V1 is sufficient to flatten said first drop of ink and give said first drop of solidified ink a flattening contact area equivalent to the contact area obtained at equilibrium for a drop of the same liquid ink with the same volume VOL1 present on a surface on which the drop of liquid ink forms a static contact angle of less than or equal to 60.

14. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the first ejection velocity V1 of the drop of ink E1 being such that if several drops of ink E1 having a volume VOL1 of 6 pl are deposited at the first ejection velocity V1, the mean diameter of the solidified drops deposited is, seen from above, greater than or equal to 40 m.

15. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the first ejection velocity V1 of the drop of ink E1 being such that if several drops of ink E1 having a volume VOL1 of 6 pl are deposited at the first ejection velocity V1, the mean diameter of the solidified drops deposited is, seen from above, greater than or equal to 42 m.

16. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the marking is printed on the surface of an ophthalmic lens.

17. The printing method as claimed in claim 1, the surface that cannot be wetted by the ink in liquid form being such that the drops of liquid ink have a static contact angle with the surface of greater than or equal to 100.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

(1) The remainder of the description refers to the appended figures.

(2) Description of the figures

(3) FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of the coalescence phenomenon.

(4) FIG. 2 is a flowchart of the steps of one embodiment of the method of the invention.

(5) FIG. 3 is a photo obtained after deposition of the first pass according to the invention on an uncut finished ophthalmic lens 1.

(6) FIG. 4 is a photo obtained after deposition of the second pass according to the invention on an uncut finished ophthalmic lens according to the method according to the invention.

(7) FIG. 5 is a photo obtained after the ophthalmic lens marked by means of the method according to the invention has been subjected to a simulation of transport from the production site to the optician's.

(8) FIG. 6 is a photo obtained after the ophthalmic lens marked without using the method according to the invention has been subjected to a simulation of transport from the production site to the optician's.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(9) More particularly the present invention relates, according to a first embodiment of the invention, to a method for printing an inkjet marking on a surface that cannot be wetted by the ink in liquid form, which comprises the following steps:

(10) (a) forming at least a first drop of solidified ink on the surface, by ejecting, by means of a printhead, a first drop of liquid ink at a first given ejection velocity and with a first given volume, and

(11) (b) depositing, on at least one portion of said first drop of ink, at least a second drop of ink having a second volume, by ejecting, by means of a printhead, a second drop of liquid ink at an ejection velocity.

(12) In this embodiment, the first velocity is sufficient to flatten the first drop of ink and give said first drop of ink a flattening contact area equivalent to that obtained at equilibrium for a drop of liquid ink of the same volume on a wettable surface.

(13) A wettable surface is understood to mean a surface on which the drop of liquid ink forms a static contact angle of less than or equal to 80, preferably less than or equal to 60.

(14) Furthermore, the flattening contact area corresponds to a contact area between the first drop of ink and the non-wetting surface during the deposition of the second drop of ink.

(15) In general, the method of the invention comprises, during or after each step of depositing a drop of liquid ink, a step of solidifying the drop of ink deposited (steps 2 and 4, FIG. 2).

(16) Thus, if the first drop of liquid ink ejected onto the surface is solidified before the deposition of the second drop of ink, the flattening contact area is defined as the contact area of the first drop of ink on the surface, once solidified.

(17) These solidification steps 2 and 4 may be carried out during the deposition steps 1 and 3 or at the end of these deposition steps.

(18) Depending on the nature of the ink used, the solidification may be obtained by polymerization, drying, evaporation of solvent, cooling or curing. The drying and the evaporation of solvent may be carried out at room temperature or at a higher temperature. The polymerization and the curing may be a thermal polymerization or curing, or a polymerization or curing obtained by irradiation with actinic radiation, for example irradiation with ultraviolet light.

(19) Such solidification steps, in particular drying, polymerization or curing steps, are well known to a person skilled in the art.

(20) In the end, a marked article is recovered (step 5, FIG. 2), the marking of which is clearly defined and has good mechanical hold.

(21) The first ejection velocity of the drop of ink, sufficient to flatten the first drop of ink and give it a flattening contact area equivalent to that obtained at equilibrium on a wettable surface, may be defined in the following manner: it is advantageously an ejection velocity such that if several drops of ink having a volume of 6 pl are deposited with said ejection velocity on the non-wettable surface, the mean diameter of the solidified drops deposited, as seen from above, is greater than 39 m, preferably greater than or equal to 40 m and better greater than or equal to 42 m.

(22) The observation of the drop diameters may be carried out with a calibrated microscope.

(23) According to one aspect of this embodiment, the surface is a surface of non-zero curvature.

(24) Thus, the marking may be printed on the surface of an optical article, preferably an ophthalmic lens.

(25) According to another aspect of this embodiment, the first volume of the first drop of ink is less than the critical volume for which the first drop of ink bursts or rebounds when it is deposited at the first velocity on the non-wettable surface.

(26) A surface that cannot be wetted by the ink in liquid form is understood preferably to mean a surface such that the drop of liquid ink has a static contact angle with the surface of greater than or equal to 90, preferably greater than or equal to 100.

(27) According to one aspect of this embodiment, although it is possible to use different inks for the first drop of ink and the second drop of ink, preferably the same ink will be used for the first and second drops of ink, in particular an ink having an identical color. In all cases, at least the ink of the second drop has a color in the visible spectrum.

(28) According to one aspect of this embodiment, the first drop of ink and the second drop of ink respectively have a first volume VOL1 and a second volume VOL2 such that VOL1/VOL2<1, or even VOL1/VOL20.5, or else VOL1/VOL20.2.

(29) The first volume is for example within the range [5 pl to 15 pl].

(30) The second volume is for example within the range [20 pl to 50 pl].

(31) The non-wetting surface may in particular be a hydrophobic surface having a static contact angle with water of greater than or equal to 80, better greater than or equal to 90, better still greater than or equal to 100, and preferably greater than or equal to 110.

(32) A second embodiment of the invention is a method for printing a marking, for example a temporary marking, via inkjet printing on a surface that cannot be wetted by said ink in liquid form. This method for printing a marking comprises a repetition of the steps of the first method according to the first embodiment. Thus, the formation of several first drops of ink solidified on the non-wettable surface and the deposition of several second drops of ink on top of said first drops are carried out.

(33) Thus, by repeating the steps of the method according to the first embodiment, it is possible to form a marking comprising a repetition of tie points produced by the solidified first drops of ink, flattened on the non-wettable surface so as to confer sufficient adhesion, and on top, a repetition of the second drops of ink which make it possible to give sufficient visibility to the marking.

(34) According to one aspect of the second embodiment, several of the solidified first drops of ink are formed on the surface in a first inkjet printing pass and several of the second drops of ink deposited on top of said first drops of ink are deposited in a second inkjet printing pass, after the first pass.

(35) Alternatively, some of the second drops of ink are deposited on the solidified first drops of ink when all of the first drops of ink that make it possible to form the marking are not yet formed on the surface.

(36) According to one aspect of the invention, during the first pass, only first drops are deposited. According to another aspect of the invention, a minority of drops deposited during the first pass are not first drops as defined above. Said minority is defined as representing less than a third of the drops, preferably less than a quarter, or even less than a fifth of the drops deposited during the first pass. Preferably, substantially all the solidified ink drops formed during the first pass are first drops of ink as defined above.

(37) The invention also applies to an article comprising a main surface on which at least one inkjet marking is printed on a surface that cannot be wetted by the ink in liquid form. In particular, said marking comprises a first drop of solidified ink having a first volume and a flattening contact area with the surface of the lens equivalent to that obtained at equilibrium for a drop of liquid ink of the same volume on a wettable surface. A wettable surface is understood to mean a surface on which the drop of liquid ink has a contact angle of less than or equal to 80, preferably less than or equal to 60.

(38) The marking furthermore comprises a second drop of ink having a second volume, covering, at least partly, said first drop of ink.

(39) According to one aspect of the invention, the above article may comprise several dried first drops forming a first layer and having several second drops, forming at least a second layer.

(40) A first aspect of the second embodiment of the method of the invention has been represented in FIG. 2 in the form of a flowchart.

(41) Step 1 consists of the inkjet deposition, on a surface of an article, of a first layer of ink E1 at a velocity V1 and a drop volume VOL1. This first layer of ink is then solidified in step 2 and forms a base marking on which, in step 3, a second layer of ink is formed by inkjet deposition of an ink E2 at a velocity V2 lower than V1 and a drop volume VOL2 greater than VOL1. The second layer of ink obtained in step 3 is then solidified during a step 4 before the recovery, in step 5, of an article having, on its surface, a printed marking that is clearly defined and has good mechanical hold.

(42) Generally, the first ejection velocity V1 of the first drops of ink E1 is chosen to be high enough to allow a flattening of the first drops of ink E1, and thus an increase in the contact area of the first drops of ink E1 with the printing surface, in particular a hydrophobic printing surface.

(43) Independently of this embodiment, the inventors have identified a method for determining the minimum adequate ejection velocity V1. According to the invention, generally, the minimum ejection velocity V1 of the first drops of ink E1 is such that for a given ink E1 and a substrate surface made of a given material, in particular hydrophobic material, this velocity results, for a first drop of ink E1 having a volume VOL1 of 6 pl, in a mean diameter of the drops deposited on the surface of the substrate of greater than 39 m, preferably greater than or equal to 40 m and better greater than or equal to 42 m. In general, the mean diameter of the drops of ink E1 of the first layer will be from 41 m to 45 m, for example 43 m.

(44) Thus, a suitable means for determining the first ejection velocity of the ink in order to make the first drops of ink stick to a surface, in particular a hydrophobic surface, may consist in: depositing on the surface drops of 6 pl at various increasing ink ejection velocities; measuring the mean diameters of the drops deposited; and retaining the ejection velocity that makes it possible to obtain drops of ink having a mean diameter at least equal to 40 m.

(45) The mean radius of the drops may be measured by means of an optical microscope with a 10 or 20 magnifying lens with a calibrated measuring table, according to its instructions, to carry out precise movements of less than a micrometer and comprising an apparatus for controlling the movement. Such an apparatus may be a Nikon Trinocular MM40 measuring microscope distributed by Nikon Corp.

(46) In particular, it is possible to deposit several neighbouring drops of 6 pl with a density of 360 dpi (dots per inch (2.54 cm)), i.e. approximately a pitch of 70.5 m. Next, by using the measuring microscope, the diameters of 10 to 15 drops are measured and averaged. If the drops are coalesced, it is preferable to redo the measurements with a larger pitch.

(47) A simple relationship may be calculated between the diameter of a drop of liquid, equivalent to a sphere portion, and the contact angle between this drop and the surface on which it is deposited. The document Contact Angle and Wetting Properties by Yuehua Yuan and T. Randall Lee, Surface Science Techniques, Springer Series in Surface Sciences 51, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-34243-1_1 in section 1.5.1: The wetting angle at equilibrium, theta, for a very small drop, may be equivalent to 2*A tan(h/c), with h a height at the center of the drop and c the radius of a circle describing the contact area between the sphere portion representing the drop and the surface on which the drop is placed.

(48) A person skilled in the art knows, by means of these calculations, and simple geometric calculations for the volume of a partial sphere, that a drop of ink of 6 pl, having a static contact angle of 100 with the surface, has an apparent diameter of 26.3 m approximately for an actual contact area having a diameter of 25.8 m approximately. And for a static contact angle of 110, like for the ink/surface pairings studied in the invention: a diameter of 25 m for an actual contact diameter of 23 m.

(49) Similarly, obtaining a drop having a diameter of 40 m or more amounts, apart from the flattening mechanism, to having either an absorbant surface, or a static contact angle between the drop and the surface of less than 49.5 when the apparent diameter is greater than 39.6 m, and an angle of less than 45 (Pi/4) for an apparent diameter of greater than 41 m.

(50) Thus, in view of the examples above, the ejection velocity of the first drops is such that the first drops, having a static contact angle of greater than 100 with the surface, are deformed so as to cover an area equivalent to that which they would cover if they were present on a surface having a high wettability, with a static contact angle of less than 50, preferably 45.

(51) A person skilled in the art therefore understands that the invention relates to the fact of adding sufficient kinetic energy to at least a first drop so that, on the one hand, the drop is flattened on the surface so as to have, during the solidification thereof, a contact area close to a contact area, at equilibrium, on a wettable surface, for example with a static contact angle of less than 80, preferably less than 70, better less than 60, better still less than 45, and so that, on the other hand, the drop is small enough so that it does not burst or split up during the impact between the first drop and the non-wettable surface. These bursting cases may at least take place for drops of from 35 to 50 pl ejected under a voltage of 15 V when they are deposited directly on the hydrophobic, non-wettable surface with a static contact angle with water of greater than 110.

(52) The first highly flattened drops do not have a partial sphere or spherical dome shape like a drop at equilibrium with a static contact angle of from 45 to 60, but a shape that resembles rather a truncated version of the biconcave disc shape characteristic of red blood cells.

(53) However, the method of determining the first velocity V1 is not critical in order to be able to apply the principle of the invention.

(54) An alternative method of determining the first velocity V1 that is less precise but as industrially effective as the method presented above, may be to deposit, on several substrates having a main surface that has identical characteristics of non-wettability with the liquid ink, first layers with drops that have an identical first volume of between 5 pl and 15 pl, for example 6 pl. Furthermore, the first layers are deposited at different velocities depending on the substrates so that for at least one clearly identified substrate, the first layer is deposited at a first velocity V1 different from the first velocity V1 used for depositing the first layer of at least one other substrate. Preferably, several first velocities V1 are thus used.

(55) Next, on each of the substrates, the second pass is carried out during which one or more layers may be deposited with drops ejected at a second velocity V2, here lower than the first velocity V1, and with a second drop volume larger than the first volume, for example a second substantially constant volume of between 20 pl and 60 pl; the second velocities V2 and the second volume here being identical for all the substrates tested.

(56) The adhesion performances may then be evaluated by introducing the marked lenses into standard pouches, depositing the pouches in a container, shaking the container or carrying out a transport simulation as described below.

(57) It then becomes easy for a person skilled in the art to visually compare the lenses in order to identify that or those having the least degraded markings and to thus determine a minimum first ejection velocity V1 in order to have a marking that has sufficient adhesion.

(58) It is furthermore known that when piezoelectric ink ejection devices are used, it is possible, for each printhead, to correlate the ejection velocity to the voltage applied to the device. In this case, it is possible to apply the invention without directly controlling the ejection velocity as such and only varying the voltages applied.

(59) The inventors have determined in particular that for an XAAR inkjet printhead (such as the XAAR 1001 GS6 printhead) such as that used in the Teco X302 machine distributed by TECOPTIQUE between 2010 and at least 2012, that first velocities V1 suitable for ejecting the ink E1 of the first layer are obtained for applied voltages of 10 volts or more, preferably 12 volts or more, better 14 volts or more and better still 15 volts or more. In general, the appropriate voltages are from 7 to 18 volts depending on the inks and the inkjet printing machines. However, as a function of the machine, the ink and the wettability of the ink with the surface, the appropriate voltage may be higher or lower.

(60) Thus, the minimum first velocity V1 used according to the invention, for a drop of ink such as those used from the example, may be defined as being the velocity of a 6 pl drop of ink from an XAAR 1001 GS6 printhead having an applied voltage of 10 V, knowing that for this printhead, an applied voltage of 18 V corresponds to an ejection velocity of around 6 m/s.

(61) A person skilled in the art will understand that the less wettable the ink on the surface, the higher the minimum first velocity V1.

(62) According to one embodiment of the invention, as indicated above, the ejection velocity V2 of the ink E2 in order to form the second layer of ink of the printed marking may be lower than the first velocity V1 for ejecting the ink E1 of the first layer.

(63) In the case where a piezoelectric printing device is used, the voltages to be used for the second pass will be chosen as a function of a desired visibility for the second layer and may be less than, greater than or equal to those used for depositing the first layer, for example less than or equal to 15 volts, or to 12 volts, or to 10 volts, or even 5 volts or less, for example 2 volts.

(64) As already mentioned above, use is preferably made, in order to form the first layer of ink E1 on the surface to be marked, of ink drops of small size, that is to say generally having a volume VOL1 of less than or equal to 18 pl, and generally ranging from 5 pl to 15 pl, for example 6 pl. Thus, any risk of coalescence of the drops of ink E1 of the first layer is avoided and above all the drops deposited at the velocity V1 are prevented from rebounding or bursting on coming into contact with the non-wettable surface. A person skilled in the art will know how to adapt the volume of the drops of the first layer as a function of the dot density (dots per inch: dpi) desired for the marking to be printed.

(65) The volume VOL2 of the drops of ink E2 of the second layer is greater than that of the drops of ink E1 of the first layer and is in general from 20 pl to 60 pl, for example 42 pl approximately.

(66) Preferably, the VOL1/VOL2 ratio of the drops of ink E1 and E2 satisfies the relationship VOL1/VOL2<1, better VOL1/VOL20.5 and better still VOL1/VOL20.2.

(67) Preferably, the number of drops of ink E1 of the first layer and the number of drops of ink E2 of the second layer of the printed marking is the same. But, as a variant, it is possible to provide a greater number of drops for the first layer relative to the second layer. Moreover, the drops of ink of the first layer and those of the second layer may be distributed differently. Thus, for example, it is possible to provide a greater drop density of the first and/or of the second layer near the desired limits of the marking and a lower drop density at the center of the marking.

(68) Although it is possible to use different inks E1 and E2, use will preferably be made of the same ink, in particular having an identical color, for the first and second layers. In all cases, at least the ink of the second drops has a color in the visible spectrum.

(69) Although, for economic reasons, it is sufficient to deposit only two layers in order to form the ink marking, it is possible to deposit additional layers. These additional layers are preferably deposited under the same conditions as the second layer of ink E2.

(70) This is in particular the case during marking out on surfaces of high curvature such as are found on finished or semi-finished ophthalmic lenses having a base curve of 5 or more. Such lenses have a large height variation between the center and the edge. Such a height variation may result in having a loss of sharpness at the edges if a normal deposition velocity is used, even for surfaces that are not particularly hydrophobic. It is therefore preferable, in this case, to deposit two successive layers with a reduced ejection velocity, for example with a voltage of 2 volts instead of depositing a layer with a normal ejection velocity, for example with a voltage of 5 volts.

(71) If the curvature of the lens is such that the standard method for this curvature recommends using two passes for a non-hydrophobic surface, the method according to the invention will preferably comprise a first pass at the ejection velocity V1 with drops of volume VOL1 then two passes at ejection velocity V2 with drops of volume VOL2.

(72) The method for printing an inkjet marking according to the invention may be used for printing an inkjet marking on any type of surface, but proves particularly suitable for printing an inkjet marking on hydrophobic surfaces, and more particularly ultra-hydrophobic surfaces of optical articles such as ophthalmic lenses for instance spectacle lenses.

(73) A hydrophobic surface in the present invention is understood to mean a surface having a static contact angle with water of greater than or equal to 90, better greater than or equal to 100 and preferably greater than or equal to 110.

(74) Generally, the invention applies to the deposition of inks that have insufficient wetting with the surface to be marked. For example, the ink may be an ink for hydrophilic surfaces that it is desired to deposit on a hydrophobic surface; or, conversely, the ink may be an ink for hydrophobic surfaces that it is desired to deposit on a hydrophilic surface.

(75) Examples of hydrophobic surfaces, conventionally used in ophthalmic optics, are the anti-soiling layers used as an outer coating for ophthalmic lenses and spectacle lenses.

(76) Among the standard anti-soiling layers, mention may be made of the layers formed from the commercial products OPTOOL-DSX (fluoroelastomer) and KY 130 sold respectively by DAIKIN INDUSTRIES LTD and SHIN ETSU CHEMICAL CO. LTD. These coatings have static angles with water equal to 112.5 or 115.5 for two variants of the DSX product and of around 111 for KY 130.

(77) The inks that can be used in the method may be any inks conventionally used for the printing of inkjet markings, in particular for marking ophthalmic lenses.

(78) Among the commercial inks that can be used in the method of the invention, mention may be made of the inks T002 LED and T002-06 LED sold by TECOPTIQUE, or of other inks such as the ink Y-001, Y-002 or Y-003 distributed by Automation & Robotics.

(79) Preferably, after each deposition step, the layer of ink formed is solidified, for example by polymerization via UV irradiation, depending on the nature of the ink used.

Example

(80) The inkjet marking of the surface of various lenses having a hydrophobic surface was carried out using the method of the invention and a standard inkjet marking method.

(81) Characteristic of the Lenses

(82) TABLE-US-00001 Optical power AR Hydrophobic (diopters) Substrate coating coating Lens no. 1 flat CR39 standard OPTOOL DSX Lens no. 2 +6 CR39 standard KY 130 Lens no. 3 +6 CR39 standard OPTOOL DSX
Since the type of antireflective coating used has no impact on the surface properties, it is not specified in further detail.
Inks Used
T002 LED
T002-06 LED
Contact Angles of the Inks with the Surface of the Lenses

(83) TABLE-US-00002 Contact angle Lens no. Ink T002 LED Ink T002-06 LED 1 111 112 2 117 121 3 113 115
The measurement of the contact angles may be carried out for example with a DSA100 measuring machine distributed by KROUS. Depending on the way in which the wetting angle may be measured, it may be necessary to carry out a calculation in order to get back to the angle between the air-drop interface and the substrate-drop interface.
APrinting According to the Invention
Teco X302 inkjet printing device distributed by TECOPTIQUE.
Printing Parameters

(84) First Pass Drop volume [6 pl, i.e. setting 1 of the Teco X302 device] Voltage applied [15 V] Number of drops deposited: uniform density of 360 dpi. UV polymerization following deposition of the complete first layer of ink.

(85) Second Pass

(86) The marking deposited is overall superimposed on the marking of the first pass, it being possible for the drops of the second pass to go over the edges of the drops of the first pass that they cover. The marking is furthermore deposited as two successive layers with the same printing parameters with a UV polymerization step following the deposition of each of the two layers of the second pass. Drop volume [42 pl, i.e. setting 7 of the Teco X302 device] Voltage applied [2 V] Number of drops deposited: uniform density of 360 dpi.
BPrinting According to a Conventional Method

(87) The marking is deposited as two successive layers with the same printing parameters with a UV polymerization step following the deposition of each of the two layers. Drop volume [42 pl, i.e. setting 7 of the Teco X302 device] Voltage applied [2 V] Number of drops deposited: uniform density of 360 dpi. UV polymerization following creation of the complete second layer of ink.
CResults

(88) FIG. 3 is a photo obtained after deposition of the first pass according to method A according to the invention on an uncut finished ophthalmic lens 1 provided for a right lens.

(89) This ophthalmic lens 1 has here temporary marks 2 to 5, namely a reference point 2 located at the center of this ophthalmic lens 1, a mark 3 indicating a far vision zone control point located just above the reference point 2, a mark 4 indicating a near vision zone control point located below the reference point 2 and two groups 5 and 6 of alignment lines that pass through a horizontal nasal-temporal (or else nose-ear) axis making it possible to locate the microcircles.

(90) The microcircles, which have not been rendered visible in this photograph, are permanent marks that make it possible in particular to correctly position the ophthalmic lens 1 for subsequent manufacturing steps of this ophthalmic lens; for example the surfacing, polishing and/or trimming of the latter.

(91) It can be seen that the outline of the temporary marks 2 to 6 is clearly defined but with a low contrast.

(92) FIG. 4 is a photo obtained after deposition of the second pass according to method A according to the invention on an uncut finished ophthalmic lens provided for a right lens.

(93) It can be seen that the outline is as clearly defined as in FIG. 3, but has a higher contrast.

(94) It should be noted that, on leaving the printing machine, an uncut finished ophthalmic lens marked by means of the method B will at first sight resemble the lens from FIG. 4.

(95) FIG. 5 is a photo obtained after the ophthalmic lens marked by means of the method according to the invention has been subjected to a simulation of transport from the production site to the optician's.

(96) In practice, the simulation of transport is obtained by placing the uncut finished ophthalmic lens in a standard envelope used for this type of consignment by the ophthalmic industries, then by placing this lens with others in a cardboard box which is sent in a truck from Paris (France) to Dijon (France) then sent back to Paris.

(97) By way of comparison, FIG. 6 is a photo obtained after the ophthalmic lens marked by means of method B, and therefore not using the method according to the invention, has been subjected to a simulation of transport from the production site to the optician's. The ophthalmic lens 1 is provided for a left eye.

(98) It can thus be seen that the marking present on the ophthalmic lens 1 comprises at least two zones 6 and 7 where the marking is completely erased. In the case of this lens, it is apparent in particular that in zone 6, two of the left alignment lines 5 that make it possible to locate the microcircles are erased and in the zone 7, part of the marking indicating the far vision zone control point 3 is also erased. In particular, the right ) sign is completely erased and the + sign, which could have made it possible to find the center of this zone, is no longer recognizable.

(99) It may furthermore be observed that the ophthalmic lens has a dirty appearance, traces of ink are present in a form resembling dust in the center.