Bicycle Wheels

Abstract

A wheel for use with a bicycle includes a hub for mounting the wheel to a bicycle, a rim about which a tire is mountable, and a plurality of spokes that extend between the hub and the rim. The rim and/or one or more of the spokes have a leading and/or trailing edge, at least part of which has an undulating configuration.

Claims

1. A wheel for use with a bicycle, the wheel comprising a hub about which the wheel is mountable to a bicycle, a rim about which a tyre is mountable, and a plurality of spokes that extend between the hub and the rim, wherein at least part of the rim has an undulating configuration having peaks and troughs.

2. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the undulating configuration is smooth in form.

3. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the undulating configuration is substantially devoid of angular transitions between the peaks and troughs of the undulating configuration.

4. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the undulating configuration is arranged along the full extent of the rim, such that the rim is either intermittently undulating or continually undulating.

5. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the rim has a radially inner edge with an undulating configuration.

6. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the peaks and troughs of the undulating configuration are arranged at regular intervals.

7. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the rim comprises a series of alternating concave and convex regions, which are immediately adjacent to each other.

8. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the peaks of the undulating configuration comprise a convex exterior profile in the plane of the wheel, such that the peaks do not comprise an angular apex.

9. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the peaks of the undulating configuration comprise a convex exterior profile in the plane of the wheel, such that the peaks do not comprise a region of constant radial distance.

10. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the rim comprises a radially inner edge and side surfaces, and the exterior cross-sectional profile of the side surfaces at the radially inner edge of the rim has a radius of at least 5 mm.

11. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the difference in radial height between the peaks and troughs of the undulations is at least 5 mm, at least 10 mm, or at least 20 mm.

12. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the rim has side surfaces which curve laterally outwards from a base of the rim, and then curve laterally inward, before meeting at a radially inner edge of the rim.

13. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the undulating configuration comprises a radial distance that varies between the peaks and troughs of the undulating configuration, and wherein peaks of the undulating configuration comprise points of minimum radial distance of the undulating configuration.

14. The wheel as claimed in claim 1, wherein the undulating configuration comprises a radial distance that varies between the peaks and troughs of the undulating configuration, and wherein troughs of the undulating configuration comprise points of maximum radial distance of the undulating configuration.

15. A bicycle having at least one wheel as claimed in claim 1.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0044] Embodiments of the invention will now be described in greater detail, by way of illustration only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0045] FIG. 1 is a side view of a first embodiment of a wheel according to the invention;

[0046] FIG. 2 is a front view of the wheel of FIG. 1;

[0047] FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the wheel of FIGS. 1 and 2;

[0048] FIG. 4 is a cross-section through the rim of the wheel of FIGS. 1 to 3;

[0049] FIG. 5 is a side view of a second embodiment of a wheel according to the invention;

[0050] FIG. 6 is a front view of the wheel of FIG. 5;

[0051] FIG. 7 is a perspective view of the wheel of FIGS. 5 and 6;

[0052] FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a third embodiment of a wheel according to the invention;

[0053] FIG. 9 is a side view of a fourth embodiment of a wheel according to the invention;

[0054] FIG. 10 is a front view of the wheel of FIG. 9;

[0055] FIG. 11 is a perspective view of the wheel of FIGS. 9 and 10

[0056] FIGS. 12A-12D show side views of two conventional wheels, and two wheels according to the invention, which underwent CFD analysis;

[0057] FIGS. 13A-13D show the exterior cross-sectional profile of the rim of each wheel of FIGS. 12A-12D.

[0058] FIG. 14 shows the CFD analysis data for the wheels of FIGS. 12 and 13;

[0059] FIG. 15 illustrates the CFD analysis data of FIG. 14 relating to the drag forces across a range of yaw angles; and

[0060] FIG. 16 illustrates the CFD analysis data of FIG. 14 relating to the location of the center of pressure across a range of yaw angles.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0061] The first With reference to FIG. 1, a bicycle wheel is generally designated 1. The wheel 1 has an annular rim 2, elongate spokes 3 and a central hub 4.

[0062] The rim 2 has the form of a circular annulus. The rim 2 defines radially inner 5 and radially outer surfaces as well as side surfaces 7, 8. The inner surface 5 defines the inner periphery of the rim 2, i.e. it faces inwardly, towards the central hub 4. The outer surface defines the outer periphery of the rim 2, i.e. it faces outwardly, away from the hub 4.

[0063] The side surfaces 7, 8 of the rim 2 are symmetrical about the plane in which the wheel 1 lies, as shown in FIG. 4. In particular, the side surfaces 7, 8 are each curved in a plane orthogonal to that in which the wheel 1 lies, and are generally convex in form. They meet at a point on the inner surface of the rim 2, in particular, at a radially inner edge of the rim. The side surfaces curve laterally outwards from the base of the rim, and then curve laterally inwards, before meeting at the radially inner edge of the rim. The side surfaces have a smooth configuration,

[0064] A substantially V-shaped annular channel is provided in the outer periphery of the rim 2, within which a tire 6 is received.

[0065] The hub 4 comprises an elongate cylinder 13. Two flanges 14 are provided on the cylinder 13, one close to each end of the cylinder 13. Each spoke 3 connects to one of the flanges 14 at connection locations on the outward-facing surface of the flange 14. These connection locations are spaced at regular intervals around the flange 14. Connection formations are provided at these locations which are adapted to connect to corresponding connection formations provided on the spokes 3. The spokes 3 are elongate metal rods. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 to 3, there are twelve spokes in total. Six of the spokes are connected to one of the flanges 14, and six are connected to the other flange 14, in an alternating arrangement.

[0066] As noted above, the flanges 14 are located close to, but not at, the ends of the cylinder 13. This means that end portions 15 of the cylinder 13 project from the wheel 1 and are adapted to rotatably mount the wheel 1 to the frame of a bicycle.

[0067] The inner surface 5 of the rim 2 defines a plurality of elevations. These include support elevations 9, which are located in the region of connection of each spoke with the inner surface 5. Each support elevation 9 connects to a spoke 3. The elevations also include ancillary elevations 10, which are located between the support elevations. Both support 9 and ancillary 10 elevations have a generally dome-shape configuration. The support elevations 9 and the ancillary elevations 10 cooperate to provide a regularly undulating inner surface of the rim 102. When the wheel 1 is viewed from the side, as shown in FIG. 1, it can be seen that the support elevations 9 are slightly raised relative to the ancillary 10 elevations.

[0068] A second embodiment of a wheel according to the invention is shown in FIGS. 5 to 7, which is generally designated 201. FIG. 5 shows a bicycle wheel 201 having a rim 202 and hub 204. The rim 202 has radially inner 205 and outer 206 surfaces, and side surfaces 207,208. As with the first embodiment, the inner surface 205 defines the inner periphery of the rim 202, i.e., it faces towards the central hub 204. The outer surface 206 defines the outer periphery of the rim, i.e., it faces outwardly, away from the hub 204.

[0069] As with the first embodiment, the side surfaces 207, 208 are symmetrical about the plane in which the wheel 201 lies. The side surfaces 207, 208 are curved in a plane orthogonal to that in which the wheel 201 lies, such that they meet at an annular edge on the inner surface 205 of the rim 202.

[0070] In the example of FIGS. 5 to 7, there are four wide spokes 216. The spokes connect the inner surface 205 of the rim 202 to the hub 204. The spokes 216 connect to the inner surface 205 at equally spaced locations along the length of the inner surface 205.

[0071] Equally spaced recesses 210 are defined in the portions of the inner surface 205 which are located between the points of connection of the inner surface 205 to the spokes 203. These recesses 210 define a series of undulations, such that, when the wheel is viewed from the side as in FIG. 5, a continuous profile of elevations 211 and recesses 210 is seen. The heights of the elevations alternate between two slightly different values along the length of the inner surface, as can be seen in FIG. 5. As discussed above in relation to the first embodiment, this regularly undulating inner surface of a rim 202 has been found to provide aerodynamic advantages.

[0072] The hub 204 shown in FIGS. 5 to 7 comprises a circular disc which is oblate, ie the thickness of the disc is greater at its central region than at its periphery. The hub 204 has curved side surfaces which meet at an annular edge at the periphery of the disc, giving the disc a cigar-shaped cross-section. The hub 204 further defines a central shaft 218 projecting outwardly from the side surfaces of the hub 204. The shaft 218 is adapted to be rotatably mounted to the frame of a bicycle, for example by being received within corresponding openings in the frame.

[0073] The spokes 216 connect to the hub 204 at points that are equally spaced about the periphery of the disc.

[0074] A fourth embodiment of a wheel according to the invention is shown in FIG. 8, which is generally designated 301. This differs from the embodiment shown in FIGS. 5 to 7 in that undulations 319 are also defined on the spokes 316. In particular, the undulations 319 are defined on the long edges of the spokes 316 which lie in the plane of the wheel 301. The undulating surface of the spokes 316 has also been found to provide aerodynamic advantages.

[0075] A further embodiment of a wheel according to the invention is shown in FIGS. 9 to 11, which is generally designated 101.

[0076] The inner surface of the rim 102 defines recesses 110 at regular intervals along its length. The presence of the recesses 110 means that the inner surface 105 defines a plurality of support elevations 111, each having an angular apex. The profile of the support elevations 111 of the present embodiment is steeper than the profile of the elevations 9, 10 shown in FIG. 3.

[0077] Such support elevations 111 are located on either side of each recess 110. The support elevations 111 are therefore also spaced at regular intervals along the length of the inner surface 105 of the rim 102. When the wheel 101 is viewed from the side, as shown in FIG. 9, each recess 110 is symmetrical about a line drawn through the hub 104 and bisecting the two adjacent support elevations 111.

[0078] In this embodiment, the recesses 110 in the rim 102 are deeper than in the first embodiment. In addition, the support elevations 111 do not curve smoothly but instead have an angular apex. Furthermore, each of the elevations on the inner periphery of the rim is connected to a spoke 103.

[0079] In this embodiment, the support elevations 111 offer the advantage of reducing the stress experienced in the rim 102 at the point at which the spoke 103 is mounted.

[0080] Each spoke 103 connects one of the flanges 14 to the apex of one of the support elevations 11. A connection formation is provided at the apex of each support elevation 11. This connection formation is adapted to connect to a corresponding connection formation provided on the spoke 3. In the example shown in FIGS. 9 to 11, each elevation 111 is connected to the opposite flan to its neighboring support elevations 111.

[0081] In use, the weight of the frame and rider passes through the hub 104 of each of the bicycle's wheels 101. This places stress on the wheel 101 and, in particular, on regions of the rims 102 in the vicinity of the points at which the spokes 103 connect to the inner surface 105 of the rims 102. Owing to the claimed configuration of the wheel, the stresses experienced in those regions are less than those experienced in corresponding regions of wheels 101 that do not have such a configuration.

[0082] The support elevation 111 for each spoke 103 reduces the stress experienced in the rim 102 at the point at which the spoke 103 is mounted. This means that a smaller quantity of material, or a lighter material, may be used to manufacture a wheel having the same strength as a conventional wheel, thereby reducing the weight of the wheel and possibly also manufacturing costs. Alternatively, a wheel may be manufactured having the same weight as conventional wheels, but with greater strength.

[0083] FIG. 12 shows side views of two conventional wheels, and two wheels according to the invention, which underwent CFD analysis. Wheels (a) and (d) have conventional, non-undulating rims. Wheel (c) has substantially the same configuration as the embodiment of the invention shown in FIGS. 1 to 4. Wheel (b) has substantially the same configuration as the embodiment of the invention shown in FIGS. 9 to 11. The exterior cross-sectional profile of each rim is shown in FIG. 13. Wheels (a) and (c) have profile with a greater thickness along the majority of its radial extent, and a radially inner edge with a more rounded form, relative to Wheels (b) and (c). However, each of wheels (a) to (d) has the same number of spokes and the same hub configuration. Furthermore, all spokes present in wheels (a) to (d) have the same cross-section. This ensures that any differences in results in the CFD analysis results between the wheels are caused by the different rim configurations rather than different spoke or hub configurations.

[0084] Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis was carried out on these wheels, at a speed of 15 m/s, and at yaw angles of 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20. The data for the lift, drag and side forces, the torque, and the center of pressure for each wheel, at each yaw angle, are set out in FIG. 14.

[0085] FIG. 15 illustrates the CFD analysis data of FIG. 14 relating to the drag forces across the range of yaw angles tested. Wheels (a) and (c) have the same cross-sectional shape, with the only difference being the undulating configuration of the radially inner edge of Wheel (c). The CFD data shows that at all of the yaw angles tested, the wheel with the undulating configuration, Wheel (c), has less drag than the wheel with the conventional, non-undulating configuration, Wheel (a). Similarly, Wheels (b) and (d) have the same cross-sectional shape, with the only difference being the undulating configuration of the radially inner edge of Wheel (b). The CFD data shows that at yaw angles of 0-10 at least, the wheel with the undulating configuration, Wheel (b), has less drag than the wheel with the conventional, non-undulating configuration, Wheel (d). The CFD data also shows that the least drag is achieved by Wheel (c), which has an undulating configuration in combination with a more rounded, radially inner edge.

[0086] FIG. 16 illustrates the CFD analysis data of FIG. 14 relating to the location of the center of pressure across a range of yaw angles. Typically, the closer the center of pressure to the hub, the less force causing the front wheel to yaw experienced by the rider. This means the rider need not apply as large a steering input to counteract the effects of this force. The CFD data shows that the wheels that have a more rounded, radially inner edge. Wheels (a) and (c) have a center of pressure that is consistently a short distance to the front of the hub across the range of yaw angles tested. Of those wheels, the CFD data shows that at all of the yaw angles tested, the wheel with the undulating configuration, Wheel (c), has a center of pressure that is closer to the hub than the wheel with the conventional, non-undulating configuration, Wheel (a), across the range of yaw angles tested.