Fire Resistant Building Boards with Increased Amounts of Anti-Shrinkage Additives and Decreased Densities

Abstract

Disclosed is a building board with increased heat and fire resistance. Boards constructed in accordance with this disclosure have lower densities while at the same time containing larger amounts of anti-shrinkage materials. In one embodiment, a board was constructed with a density of less than 1,750 lbs/msf while at the same time including anti-shrinkage additives in amounts greater than 14% by weight of the core material. The inventors have discovered that beneficial, and heretofore unexpected, levels of fire resistance can be achieved by using increased amounts of anti-shrinkage additives in lower density building boards.

Claims

1. A low density composite fire resistant building board comprising: an exterior face formed from an ivory paper sheet, and an opposing interior face formed from grey paper sheet; a core comprising stucco, the core extending fully between the interior and exterior faces, the stucco having a weight; the set core including a plurality of minor constituents, each of the minor constituents comprising less than 1% of the stucco weight, the minor constituents consisting of a retarder, a dispersant, and an accelerator; the set core including chopped glass fiber, the chopped glass fiber comprising greater than approximately 1.0% of the stucco weight; a volume of unexpanded Grade 5 vermiculite dispersed throughout the set core, the vermiculite comprising approximately 14% or more of the stucco weight; the building board having a final dry density that is less than approximately 1,850 lbs/msf.

2. A low density composite fire resistant building board comprising: opposing sheets; a set core comprising a core material, the set core extending fully between the opposing paper sheets, the core material having a weight; a volume of expanding particles dispersed throughout the set core, the expanding particles comprising in excess of approximately 11% or more of the core material weight.

3. The building board as described in claim 2 wherein the expanding particles are Grade 5 vermiculite.

4. The building board as described in claim 2 wherein the set core includes a starch.

5. The building board as described in claim 2 wherein the core includes the following minor constituents: a retarder, a dispersant, and an accelerator.

6. A low density fire resistant building board comprising: opposing paper sheets; a set core extending fully between the opposing paper sheets, the set core comprising a material having a weight; a volume of expanding particles dispersed throughout the set core; the building board have a density that is less than approximately 1,850 lbs/msf and a fire resistance that exceeds the 1 hour target set forth in the ANSI/UL 263 testing criteria.

7. The building board as described in claim 6 wherein the expanding particles comprise in excess of approximately 11% of the weight of the core material.

8. The building board as described in claim 6 wherein the expanding particles are vermiculite particles that comprise approximately 14% or more of the weight of the core material.

9. The building board as described in claim 6 wherein the expanding particles are Grade 5 vermiculite.

10. The building board as described in claim 4 wherein the starch is present at a level that is greater than 1% of the weight of the core material.

11. The building board as described in claim 4 wherein the starch is present at a level that is between approximately 1-1.5% of the weight of the core material.

12. The building board as described in claim 2 wherein the set core includes glass fiber.

13. The building board as described in claim 2 wherein the set core includes glass fibers present in an amount that is greater than 1% of the weight of the core material.

14. The building board as described in claim 2 wherein the building board has a final dry density that is between approximately 1,750 lbs/msf and 1,850 lbs/msf.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017] For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and its advantages, reference is now made to the following descriptions, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0018] FIG. 1 is a table of a preferred board formulation in accordance with the present disclosure.

[0019] FIG. 2 is a graph of temperature versus time for a board constructed in accordance with the present disclosure.

[0020] FIG. 3 is a graph of temperature versus time for a lightweight board of the prior art.

[0021] FIG. 4 is a table of various board formulations.

[0022] FIG. 5 is a table of various board formulations.

[0023] Similar reference characters refer to similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0024] The present disclosure relates building boards with increased heat and fire resistance. The disclosed building boards have significantly lower densities while at the same time containing significantly larger amounts of anti-shrinkage materials. Preferred densities are less than approximately 1,850 lbs/msf. Anti-shrinkage additives are preferably added in amounts greater than approximately 14% of the weight of the stucco. The inventors have discovered that beneficial, and heretofore unexpected, levels of fire resistance can be achieved by using increased amounts of anti-shrinkage additives in lower density building boards. Details regarding this discovery are provided hereinafter.

[0025] Existing building boards achieve fire resistance through additives distributed in the core of the board. These additives may include materials such as chopped glass fibers and anti-shrinkage materials such as vermiculite. In order to achieve acceptable levels of fire resistance, the building boards have generally employed heavier, denser constructions. Higher density boards are not preferable as they lead to increased transportation costs and complicate installation efforts. Prior attempts at decreasing board density with known levels of anti-shrinkage additives resulted in ineffective fire performance. For example, the present inventors created a 15.6 mm board with a density of 1,750 lbs/msf. Vermiculite constituted 10% of the weight of the stucco within the core. The resulting board failed the test method and criteria in ANSI/UL 263 (UL v450).

[0026] The present inventors have discovered that desired levels of heat and fire resistance can be achieved by employing significantly higher percentages of anti-shrinkage materials over what has heretofore been known in the background art. Moreover, the inventors have further discovered that these higher percentages can be utilized in boards with considerably lower densities. Such boards unexpectedly surpassed the 1 hour target specified in ANSI/UL 263 (UL v450). One representative, but non-limiting, formulation is detailed in Table 1. This table lists the components of a board constructed in accordance with the present disclosure. The disclosed board was a 15.6 mm board, but it can be readily used in other board configurations.

[0027] As noted in FIG. 1, the board formulation includes a stucco core as well as various major and minor constituents. The density of the core is preferably achieved by mixing 1,250 lbs/msf of stucco with 1,080 lbs/msf of water. The following minor constituents were included in the core: chopped glass fibers, a retarder, a dispersant (such as disal), a ball mill accelerator (BMA), and a sugar. Most of these minor constituents are added in an amount that is less than one percent of the stucco weight. Other minor constituents, such as glass, may be added in greater amounts. In other words, each minor constituent includes a weight that is less than one percent of 1,250 lbs/msf. A number of major constituents were also provided. The largest major constituent was water, added at approximately 86.4% of the stucco weight. For example, for 100 grams of dry stucco, approximately 86.4 grams of water are added. An outer exterior ivory paper face and an interior gray paper face were also provided. These faces constitute 4.3 and 3.0% of the stucco weight respectively. In accordance with the preferred embodiment, the anti-shrinkage material used was a Grade 5 Virginia vermiculite. In accordance with an important aspect of the present invention, the vermiculite was added in an amount constituting approximately 14.7% of the stucco weight. In the specific example of FIG. 1, 184 lbs/msf of Grade 5 vermiculite was uniformly distributed throughout the stucco core. A starch in an amount of 1.5% of the stucco weight was also added. It is also within the scope of the present invention to utilize starch in amounts of up to 4 to 5% of the stucco weight. Furthermore, polymers can be used in lieu of starch to provide the necessary structure to the board. One such polymer is polyvinyl acetate.

[0028] The constituents detailed in FIG. 1 were used to construct a 15.6 mm board having an overall density of 1,780 lbs/msf. This lower density did not result in any structural degradation of the board when heated. To the contrary, the board of FIG. 1 yielded a performance in excess of 1 hour under the ANSI/UL 263 (UL v450) criteria. Increasing the thickness expansion via the addition of large volumes of anti-shrinkage materials did not appreciably decrease the integrity of the board when heated. Notably, the background art would have predicted that vermiculite added in amounts greater than 10% by weight would have unduly altered the dimensions of the core upon being heated. The success of the present formulation is illustrated in FIG. 2. In particular, FIG. 2 is a graph of temperature versus time for a board constructed in accordance with the formulation of FIG. 1. It shows that even as the board is heated to temperatures exceeding 900 Celsius for approximately 1 hour, the temperature of the unexposed board face remains at a temperature of less than 200 Celsius. This is to be compared with a lightweight building board without vermiculite (board weight at 1,710 lbs/msf). This conventional board is analyzed in FIG. 3, which shows that under the same testing conditions, the unexposed face of the board exceeds 200 degrees Celsius in approximately 45 minutes.

[0029] FIG. 1 illustrates a preferred board density of 1,780 lbs/msf and vermiculite added in an amount of approximately 14.7% of the stucco weight. However, these values are merely representative and other values fall within the scope of the present disclosure. Specifically, the inventors have found that beneficial results can be achieved with boards having a density ranging from approximately 1,750 lbs/msf to approximately 1,780 lbs/msf. Furthermore, vermiculite in amounts ranging from approximately 11% by weight to approximately 14.7% by weight of the stucco have likewise proven to be effective.

[0030] FIGS. 4 and 5 are tables showing the results of various experiments that were carried out in arriving at the preferred board formulation of FIG. 1. As illustrated by the reference board (i.e. Ref), a 61 minute fire rating can be achieved in the absence of vermiculite only by increasing the board density to 2,232 lbs/msf. Such boards would be unwieldy and result in excessive transportation costs. Board sample T2 shows that decreasing board density to 1,709 lbs/msf in the absence of added vermiculite only yields a fire rating of 43.0 min. Smaller amounts of vermiculite were added in board samples T1 and T3. However, these amounts did not yield acceptable levels of fire resistance. Board sample T4 yielded the desired 60 minute rating by increasing the vermiculite percentage to 14.7 lbs/msf.

[0031] Although the present disclosure discloses vermiculite as a preferred anti-shrinkage material, other expanding materials can likewise be used. These expanding materials include expandable graphite, perlite or expandable clay. Furthermore, fiberglass sheets can be used in lieu of paper liners. As used herein, fiberglass sheets may include mats comprising woven or non-woven fibers. Still yet other types of liners can be employed in lieu of paper or fiberglass sheets. The disclosed core can be formed from set stucco, gypsum, or cement. Other dimensions beyond the disclosed 15.6 mm thick board can readily benefit from the disclosed formulations. Boards constructed in accordance with this disclosure can be used for partition systems with steel or wood studs, and for floor/ceiling systems with steel or woods joists. The boards can likewise be used for structural steel encasement systems, ventilation and air extraction duct systems, or shaftwall systems.

[0032] Although this disclosure has been described in terms of certain embodiments and generally associated methods, alterations and permutations of these embodiments and methods will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the above description of example embodiments does not define or constrain this disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure.