Nanoparticle synthesis using plant extracts and virus

Abstract

There is described a process for production of metal-coated virus particles or metallic nanoparticles, said process comprising admixing virus particles with plant material with reducing power and a metal salt, wherein the process can be provided in planta or ex planta and the virus particles aid the production of the metal-coated virus particles or metallic nanoparticles.

Claims

1. A process for producing an enhanced yield and monodispersity of metal-coated virus particles or metallic nanoparticles, said process comprising: (a) admixing virus particles, plant material with reducing power, and a metal salt; (b) reducing a metal ion of the metal salts using the plant material; and (c) forming the metal-coated virus particles or metallic nanoparticles.

2. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the virus particles are selected from non-enveloped virus particle having a capsid coat, bacteriophages and virus-like particles which lack nucleic acid content.

3. The process as claimed by claim 2, wherein the non-enveloped viruses have a capsid coat selected from a helical capsid, a filamentous capsid, and icosahedral capsid and the bacteriophages have a morphology selected from isometric, lemon-shaped, ovoid, bottle-shaped, rod-shaped, filamentous, and pleomorphic.

4. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the virus particles are genetically and/or chemically modified viruses with an altered surface which displays metal binding or reducing peptides.

5. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the plant material is plant sap obtained from plant material selected from leaves and stalk.

6. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the plant material is provided by a dicotyledonous or monocotyledonous plant.

7. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the metal salts are selected from transition metals and aluminium, gallium, germanium, tin, silver, gold, iron, copper, indium, platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium, cobalt.

8. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the metal salt is provided as a metal chelate or metal acid.

9. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the plant material is extracted from Nicotiana sp., Musa sp., Psidium sp., Avena sp., Azadirachta sp., Chenopodium sp., Syzygium sp., Citrus sp., Glycine sp., Spinacia sp., Carica sp., Stevia sp., Pinus sp., Diopyros sp., Gingko sp., Magnolia sp., Platanus sp., Nicotiana benthamiana, Musa pradisiaca, Psidium guava, Avena sativa, Azadirachta indica, Chenopodium album, Syzygium aromaticum, Citrus, Glycine max, Spinacia oleracea, Hordeum vulgare, Triticum spp, Zea mays, Oryza sativa, Solanum tuberosum, Daucus carota, Brassica spp, Beta vulgaris , Saccharum, Solanum lycopersicum or Vitis.

10. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein a first metal salt is admixed to the plant material and virus particle at a first time point and a second or subsequent metal salt is admixed at a second time point.

11. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the metal salt is provided at a concentration in the range 1M to 110.sup.5M.

12. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the process is conducted ex planta.

13. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the process is conducted in planta.

14. The process as claimed by claim 13, wherein the process comprises: i) providing a plant infected with a non-enveloped virus and/or able to express a non-enveloped virus particle; and ii) exposing said plant to a concentration of a water-soluble metal salt sufficient for nanoparticle formation.

15. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the process comprises: i) providing a plant and exposing said plant to a concentration of a water-soluble metal salt sufficient for nanoparticle formation; and ii) exposing said plant to a non-enveloped virus and/or a genetic construct able to express a non-enveloped virus particle.

16. The process as claimed by claim 1, wherein the plant material has the capacity to reduce metals with reduction potentials in the range 1.5 V to 0.44 V.

17. A metal-coated virus particle or metallic nanoparticle produced by the process of claim 1.

18. The metal-coated virus particle or metallic nanoparticle as claimed in claim 17 sized between 5 nm to 100 nm.

19. A structure formed by metal-coated virus particles or metallic nanoparticles as claimed by claim 17.

20. A device comprising a metal-coated virus particle or metallic nanoparticle as claimed by claim 17.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) The present invention will now be further described by reference to the following, non-limiting examples, and figures in which:

(2) FIG. 1. EM analysis of the gold (a, b) and silver (c) structures formed after addition of a 10-fold dilution of N. benthamiana sap to chloroauric acid (2.910.sup.4M) or silver nitrate (2.510.sup.4M) in the absence of virus/virus-like particles. (a) Small numbers of 10-30 nm gold nanotriangles, spheres and hexagons; (b) aggregated metallized gold material; (c) aggregated conglomerates of silver nanoparticles of diverse sizes and morphologies formed after addition of a 10-fold dilution of N. benthamiana sap to silver nitrate (2.510.sup.4M).

(3) FIG. 2. EM analysis of the gold nanoparticles formed after addition of a 10-fold dilution of N. benthamiana sap to chloroauric acid (2.910.sup.4M) in the presence of TMV particles. (a) TMV networks decorated with disperse 15-40 nm gold nanoparticles observed after the addition of 0.32 g/200 l TMV to the reaction mix. (b) Metallization of TMV observed after addition of high concentrations of TMV (320 g/200 l) to the reaction mix.

(4) FIG. 3. EM analysis of gold nanoparticles formed after addition of a 10-fold dilution of boiled N. benthamiana sap to chloroauric acid (2.910.sup.4M), in the presence or absence of BPV VLPs. Inclusion of BPV VLPs (8 g/200 l) in the reaction mix led to formation of 50-100 nm particles of pentagonal, hexagonal, triangular, spherical, diamond and menhir morphologies.

(5) FIG. 4. EM analysis of silver nanoparticles formed after addition of a 10-fold dilution of N. benthamiana sap to silver nitrate (2.510.sup.4M), in the presence TMV (3.2 g/204.1). (a) Addition of TMV led to formation of dispersed 10-100 nm nanoparticles. (b) TMV particles were metallised.

(6) FIG. 5. EM analysis of gold nanoparticles formed after addition of a 50-fold dilution of H. vulgare extracts to chloroauric acid (2.910.sup.4M), in the absence of virus (a) or after the addition of (b) TMV (2 g/200 l reaction), (c) PVY (42 g/200 l reaction) or (d) eCPMV (175 g/200 l reaction).

(7) FIG. 6. EM analysis of silver nanoparticles formed after addition of a 50-fold dilution of H. vulgare extracts to 2.910.sup.4M AgNO.sub.3, in the absence of virus (a) or after the addition of (b) TMV (2 g/200 l reaction), (c) PVY (42 g/200 l reaction) or (d) eCPMV (175 g/200 l reaction).

(8) FIG. 7. EM analysis of cobalt nanoparticles formed after addition of neat H. vulgare extracts to 0.5 M Co(NO.sub.3).sub.2, in the absence of virus (a) or after the addition of (b) TMV (2 g/200 l reaction), (c) PVY (42 g/200 l reaction) or (d) eCPMV (175 g/200 l reaction).

(9) FIG. 8. EM analysis of nanoparticles produced using 10-fold dilutions of Rubus fruticosus extracts with (a) 2.910.sup.4M HAuCl.sub.4 only, and with (b) TMV at a final concentration of 0.32 g/200 l reaction. (c) silver nanoparticles produced using 10-fold dilution of Rubus fruticosus extracts with 2.910.sup.4M AgNO.sub.3 only, and with (d) CPMV at a final concentration of 175 g/200 l reaction. (e) cobalt nanoparticles produced using neat Rubus fruticosus extracts with 0.5 M Co(NO.sub.3).sub.2 only, and with (f) PVY at a concentration of 42 g/200 l reaction.

(10) FIG. 9. EM analysis of gold nanoparticles formed in planta after hydroponic application of 2.910.sup.5 M HAuC14 in (a) uninfected plants or (b) TYMV or (c) TuMV infected symptomatic plants.

(11) FIG. 10. UV-visible light spectrophotometry on silver nanoparticles produced using 10-fold dilution of barley extracts with 2.910.sup.4 M AgNO.sub.3 in the presence or absence of 100 g/ml TMV. The presence of silver nanoparticles is indicated by peak at around 475 nm and the broad shoulders from 350 nm to 600 nm, which may vary as a function of nanoparticle size. (a) Shows spectra from reactions consisting of salt only, extract with TMV, extract with AgNO.sub.3, and extract with AgNO.sub.3 and TMV. TMV only was not shown since the low concentrations used in the reactions precludes detection using this analytical method. (b) Shows the effect on nanoparticle yield and purity by purifying using two centrifugation and washing steps and a concentration step (nanoparticles were concentrated 3-fold by resuspending the pellet in a third of the original supernatant volume); most contaminants were removed (see 300-350 region) and yield enhanced. (c) EM analysis of nanoparticles before purification and concentration, and afterwards (d).

EXAMPLES

Example 1

TMV Enhances the Yield and Uniformity of Gold Nanoparticles in the Biosynthesis Reactions

(12) Initial experiments with chloroauric acid and filtered N. benthamiana sap extracts, led to rapid reduction of the gold ions into gold aggregates which were thought to be imbedded in amorphous biological material; dilution of sap and chloroauric acid prevented aggregation to some extent but compromised the number of discrete nanoparticles formed. For example, it was found that using HAuC14 at 2.910.sup.4 M, with 10-fold dilutions of the sap extract produced discrete gold nanotriangles and hexagons ranging from 10-100 nm in diameter (FIG. 1a). However, it was also observed that in addition to dispersed nanoparticles, massive micron-sized metallized amorphous aggregations were still commonly observed (FIG. 1b). These aggregates likely lowered nanoparticle numbers (yield) by sequestering available metal ions. Addition of TMV to the 10-fold diluted sap reaction mix (0.32 g/200 l) led to formation of reticulate TMV matrices with large numbers of 15-40 nm gold nanoparticles (FIG. 2a). The numbers of nanoparticles formed were significantly (approximately 5 fold) higher than that observed in the sap plus chloroauric acid only (FIGS. 1a and 1b), and particles were more uniform. Moreover, TMV also greatly reduced the incidence of aggregation. Low concentrations of TMV were found to have a positive effect on nanoparticle yield and dispersity. Higher concentrations (320 g/200 l) led to the production of metallized TMV particles (FIG. 2b) which may also be important for some applications. Therefore, TMV enhances the yield and uniformity of gold nanoparticles in the biosynthesis reactions. In addition TMV is a useful tool for modulating the reactions and can itself can become a template for gold deposition.

Example 2

BPV VLPs Enhances the Yield and Modulates Nanoparticle Particle Shape

(13) The experiment of example 1 was repeated, except that Bovine papillomavirus virus-like particles (BPV VLPs) were used in place of TMV. BPV VLPs are composed of just the BPV L1 coat protein, which when expressed in plants self assembles into virus-like particles approximately 30 nm in diameter. These VLPs do not contain nucleic acid and are thus non-infectious. The BPV L1 coat protein gene was cloned into a pCB301 binary expression vector and transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404. After overnight growth at 28 C. in LB containing appropriate antibiotics, the Agrobacterium was spun down and resuspended in infiltration medium (10 mM Mes, 10 mM MgCl.sub.2, 2011M acetosyringone) to an OD 600 of 0.5. The culture was incubated in darkness at room temperature prior to syringe infiltration into N. benthamiana leaves. The plants were harvested five days later, allowing sufficient time for significant in planta transient expression of the gene (for an overview of this process see Voinnet et al., 2003 Plant J. 33: 949-956). The leaf material was ground up in liquid nitrogen and extraction of the VLPs was carried out using a modified begomovirus procedure as described by Matic et al. (2012, Plant Biotech Journal 10: 410-421). The integrity of the VLPs was confirmed using EM analysis before being utilized as potential modulators of the synthesis of gold nanoparticles. It was found that addition of 8 g/200 l of BPV VLP to the reaction mixture produced a surprisingly diverse array of vast numbers of dispersed nanoparticles ranging in size from 50-150 nm that had pentagonal, hexagonal, triangular, spherical, diamond and menhir morphologies (see FIG. 3) versus aggregates formed in the reaction mix lacking BPV (FIG. 1b). This also contrasts the approximately 5 fold lower yields observed in the reaction mix lacking BPV VLP. Consequently BPV VLPs modulate particle number and shape, when incorporated into the gold nanoparticle synthesis mix.

Example 3

TMV can Inhibit Aggregation, and Promote Formation of High Yields of Dispersed Silver Nanoparticles, also Acting as a Template for Metallization

(14) A 1/10 dilution of sap with 2.510.sup.4M AgNO.sub.3 was used instead of HAuC14 in the protocol of example 1. Aggregated concretions of silver nanoparticles of many sizes and shapes (FIG. 1c) were observed in the control lacking TMV. In contrast, the addition of TMV (0.32 g/200 l) to the reaction mixture led to the formation of TMV matrices in which dispersed 10-100 nm nanoparticles were observed, with little sign of aggregation (FIG. 4a). Further magnification revealed that the TMV rods were also metallised (FIG. 4b). Therefore TMV can inhibit nanoparticle aggregation, and promote formation of high yields of dispersed nanoparticles, while also acting as a template for metallization.

Example 4

Other Virus-like Particles (VLPs) (such as Potato Leafroll VLPs) as Additives in the Reaction Mix

(15) A further embodiment of this technology is the use of other virus-like particles (VLPs) (such as potato leafroll VLPs) as additives in the reaction mix. VLPs are typically composed of the virus coat protein only, and are produced using plant, insect cell, bacterial and mammalian cell expression systems. It has been found that plant and insect cell expression systems can safely and efficiently be used to express virus coat protein monomers to high levels, which then self-assemble into empty virions which do not contain nucleic acid; and are thus safe and non-infectious. Moreover, these VLPs can be further modified by insertion of sequences into regions of the coat protein which are surface exposed. Consequently, the use of VLPs in the plant-based nanoparticle reaction mix will improve safety, and allow further modification of reaction kinetics/dynamics via insertion of sequences into the VLP surface that controls metal or mineral deposition.

(16) The viruses used were BPV virus like particles (VLPs), CPMV VLPs, TMV, PVY according to the examples outlined. Potato leaf roll virus VLPs were not used in any experiments.

Example 5

Reaction Mixes Utilizing Sap Extracts from Monocotyledons Plants; Barley (Hordeum vulgare)

(17) The experimental conditions outlined in examples 1-3 were repeated except that barley sap extract was used in place of N. benthamiana sap and also that TMV only was investigated. It was found that barley extracts were able to reduce both chloroauric acid and silver nitrate into metallic nanoparticles of similar size and shape to those obtained using N. benthamiana extracts. Moreover, it was also observed that inclusion of TMV in the reaction mix inhibited aggregation of metallic nanoparticles and led to the formation of metallised virus.

(18) In particular, the experiment outlined in example 1 was repeated except that Hordeum vulgare sap extracts were used in place of N. benthamiana. It was found that 50-fold dilutions of the H. vulgare extracts mixed with 2.910.sup.4 M HAuC14 led to rapid production of spherical gold nanoparticles in the 10-20 nm size range which were predominantly arranged in aggregates associated with biological material (FIG. 5a). Addition of rod-shaped TMV to the reaction mix at a concentration of 2 g/200 l reaction significantly enhanced production of 10 nm spherical nanoparticles and inhibited aggregation (FIG. 5b). Similar improvements were also obtained when filamentous Potato virus Y (PVY) (FIG. 5c) or spherical eCPMV (FIG. 5d) were added to the reactions at concentrations of 42 g/200 l or 175 g/200 l respectively; larger numbers of spherical 10-20 nm nanoparticles and no aggregation was observed when compared to the reactions lacking virus (FIG. 5).

Example 6

Reaction Mixes Utilizing Sap Extracts from Various Plants Such as Blackberries (Rubus fruticosus), Cloves (Syzygium Aromaticum), Lime (Citrus aurantifolia) Fruits, Soybean (Glycine max) Leaves and Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) Leaves

(19) Examples 1-3 are repeated using plant sap from blackberries, cloves, lime fruits, soybean leaves and spinach leaves.

(20) The experiment outlined in example 5 was repeated except that 2.910.sup.4M AgNO.sub.3 was used in place of 2.910.sup.4 M HAuCl.sub.4. It was found that 50-fold dilutions of barley extracts led to the formation of 10-20 nm spherical silver nanoparticles (FIG. 6a). In contrast, addition of TMV to the reaction mix at a concentration of 2 g/200 l facilitated the increased production of 5-30 nm spherical silver nanoparticles (FIG. 6b). The inclusion of PVY at a concentration of 42 g/200 l or eCPMV at a concentration of 175 g/200 l also led to improvement of the synthesis reaction such that larger numbers 10-25 nm particles were observed than in the reaction without viruses (FIGS. 6c and 6d respectively).

Example 7

Inclusion of Spherical, Rod-shaped or Filamentous Viruses Facilitates Production of Cobalt Nanoparticles in Hordeum vulgare (Barley) Biosynthesis Reactions

(21) The experiment outlined in example 5 was repeated except that neat barley extracts were used in conjunction with 0.5M Co(NO.sub.3).sub.2. It was found that neat barley extracts could not be used to produce cobalt nanoparticles from cobalt salts (FIG. 7a). However, addition of TMV to a final concentration of 2 g/200 l permitted the production of large 20-50 nm cobalt nanoparticles (FIG. 7b). Similarly, nanoparticles of this size were also detected when 175 g of eCPMV was added to the 200 l reaction (FIG. 7d). In contrast, with PVY (42 g/200 l reaction) a large number of 10-30 nm particles were formed in close association (FIG. 7c).

Example 8

Inclusion of a Rod-shaped Virus Enhances Production of Gold Nanoparticles in Rubus fruticosus Extracts

(22) It was found that 10-fold dilutions of Rubus fruticosus extracts mixed with 2.910.sup.4M chloroauric acid produced gold nanoparticles in the 5-50 nm size range (FIG. 8a). Addition of TMV to a final concentration of 0.32 g/200 l enhanced nanoparticle production (FIG. 8b) beyond that observed in reactions without virus.

Example 9

Inclusion of a Spherical Virus Enhances and Modifies Production of Silver Nanoparticles in Rubus fruticosus Extracts

(23) Ten-fold dilutions of Rubus fruticosus extracts catalysed the formation of 20 nm silver nanoparticles from 2.910.sup.4M AgNO.sub.3 (FIG. 8c). Addition of eCPMV at a final concentration of 175 g/200 l significantly enhanced the numbers of nanoparticles produced and increased their size distribution (FIG. 8d).

Example 10

Inclusion of a Filamentous Virus Facilitates Production of Cobalt Nanoparticles in Rubus fruticosus Extracts

(24) Ten-fold dilutions of Rubus fruticosus extracts were very inefficient at producing cobalt nanoparticles from 0.5M Co(NO.sub.3).sub.2 (FIG. 8e). However addition of PVY at a final concentration of 42 g/200 l permitted the formation of larger numbers of 30-50 nm nanoparticles (FIG. 8f).

Example 11

Intact Plants Infected with Virus or that Express VLPs from Introduced Nucleic Acid, Grown Hydroponically in Metal Salts for Nanoparticle Production

(25) It is considered that a variety of plants that are salt tolerant or are able to hyperaccumulate metal ions, for example Thellungiella halophila and Brassica juncea, could be grown hydroponically in liquid medium. After infection with virus (such as rod-shaped filamentous and icosahedral viruses) or induction of in planta VLP expression, the plants would be placed into a hydroponic system containing a metal salt/metal acid (such as HAuCl.sub.4, KAuCl.sub.4, AgNO.sub.3, In(OCCH.sub.3CHOCCH.sub.3).sub.3, PdCl.sub.2, H.sub.2PtCl.sub.6.(H.sub.2O) 6 and Ag(NH.sub.3).sub.2NO.sub.3), at concentrations ranging from 1-10,000 ppm. The plants would uptake the metals and reduce them into nanoparticles. Previous reports have shown that plants infected with viruses often have greatly increased antioxidant levels (Xu et al., 2008 New Phytol 180: 911-921). Moreover, based on our plant-extract based nanoparticle synthesis data, the presence of viruses in the plant may improve numbers and monodispersity of nanoparticles and lead to the formation of metallized viruses.

(26) In an example of this methodology, infection with spherical (Turnip yellow mosaic virus) or filamentous viruses (Turnip mosaic virus) of Brassica juncea was undertaken to determine if gold nanoparticle formation was enhanced.

(27) Brassica juncea seeds were placed in 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes which were filled with 500 l of solidified MS (Murashige and Skoog basal salts) pH 5.6, 0.8% agar nutrient media. The eppendorf tubes had their bottoms cut off at the 100 l graduation mark, to allow penetration of the MS pH5.6 nutrient solution, which was delivered from a reservoir below. The apparatus was designed such that roots would be in darkness and aerial plant parts would be exposed to light. Seeds were stratified overnight at 4 C. before transferring to a greenhouse with 22 C., 16 hour daylength conditions. The reservoir containing the MS pH 5.6, was emptied and replenished every four days. Once plants reached the two true leaf stage of development (i.e two cotyledons plus two true leaves) they were inoculated with either Turnip yellow mosaic virus (TYMV; spherical particles) or Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV; filamentous), whereby crude virus suspensions were mixed with a celite abrasive and rub inoculated onto one of the emergent two true leaves. Two weeks later the symptoms of all the virus inoculated plants became very obvious: leaf malformation, altered coloration and mosaic patterning. At this stage the MS pH 5.6 was removed and the roots were rinsed in water and supplied with either water or 2.910.sup.5M chloroauric acid. These treatments were applied to virus infected and non-inoculated control plants. Chloroauric acid and water solutions were replenished every two days. Two weeks later, material was harvested from these plants, washed and then dried before grinding into a fine powder for EM analysis.

(28) It was found that in the leaf tissue of chloroauric acid treated uninfected plants that small numbers of 10-20 nm gold nanoparticles were present (FIG. 9a), whereas higher numbers were observed in TYMV (FIG. 9b) and TuMV (FIG. 9c) infected plants. Plant virus infection, therefore enhances the formation and accumulation of gold nanoparticles in whole plants.

Example 12

Nanoparticles can be Purified from Plant Extract Synthesis Reactions and Concentrated

(29) 10 ml silver nanoparticle reactions were set up by combining a 1/10 dilution of barley extracts with 2.910.sup.4M AgNO.sub.3 in the presence or absence of 100 l/ml TMV. The reactions were left for 24 hours to allow them to progress to completion and facilitate the sedimentation of large aggregates. The supernatants were taken and analysed using spectrophotometry to determine the formation of silver nanoparticles (FIG. 10a). The presence of silver nanoparticles in the reaction can be determined due to a characteristic spectral trace: a peak at 450-470 nm wavelengths with broad shoulders stretching from 350 nm to 600 nm. This peak was detected in the extract plus silver salt reaction, indicating the presence of nanoparticles (FIG. 10a). As expected, addition of TMV to this reaction significantly enhanced the magnitude of this peak (FIG. 10a), which indicates increased nanoparticle production; which is consistent with our previous findings. As expected, AgNO.sub.3 only or extract with TMV only did not produce the typical silver nanoparticle curve, due to the absence of nanoparticles (FIG. 10a). Spectra of TMV only and extract only are not shown since the low concentration of TMV in the reaction mixes precludes detection using spectrophotometric approaches, such that the spectra of the extract only is equivalent to that of extract plus virus only. For subsequent purification and concentration of the silver nanoparticles from the extract with TMV, 9 ml of supernatant was collected and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 13,000 g. The supernatants were discarded and the pellets were resuspended in distilled deionized water to the original volume. Two further centrifugation/resuspension steps were carried out, with the final resuspension step involving addition of 3 ml of water, effectively theoretically concentrating the nanoparticles three-fold. Subsequent UV-visible spectrophotometric analysis confirmed that the purification and concentration of the nanoparticles was successful: the expected nanoparticle peak was higher and many contaminants were removed (see the decrease in the 300-350 nm region; FIG. 10b) when compared to the starting supernatant. By integrating the area under the curves (in FIG. 10b) between 375 and 600 nm wavelengths, it was estimated that the purification and concentration method led to a 2.6-fold enrichment in nanoparticle yield. By comparing the theoretical and actual fold enrichment we can estimate that 86% of the nanoparticles are retained during the purification procedure. FIGS. 10c and d respectively show EM analysis of silver nanoparticles before and after purification and concentration. As expected, greater numbers of nanoparticles were observed after concentration (FIG. 10c and d). Thus metal nanoparticles can be purified and concentrated from plant extract reactions using simple low speed centrifugation and washing steps.

(30) Although the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to particular examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in the form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the present invention.

REFERENCES

(31) Hoeppener C and Novotny L. (2012) Quarterly reviews of Biophys 45: 209-255. Wang, J. (2012) Microchimia Acta 117: 245-270. Narayanan K B, Sakthivel N. (2011) Adv Colloid Interface Sci 169:59-79. Raveendran P, Fu J, Wallen S L. (2003) J Am Chem Soc 125:13940. Sharma V K, Yngard R A, Lin Y. (2009) J Colloid Interface Sci 145:83. Narayanan K B, Sakthivel N. (2010) J Colloid Interface Sci 156:1. Govindaraju K, Basha S K, Kumar V G, Singaravelu G. (2008) J Mater Sci 43:5115. Scarano G, Morelli E. (2002) Biometals 15:145. Scarano G, Morelli E. (2003) Plant Sci 165:803. Anshup, Venkataraman J S, Subramaniam C, Kumar R R, Priya S, Kumar T R S, et al. (2005) Langmuir 21:11562. Lengke F M, Fleet E M, Southam G. (2007). Langmuir 23:2694-2699. Shankar S S, Ahmad A, Pasricha R, Sastry M. (2003) J Mater Chem13:1822 Shankar S S, Rai A, Ankamwar B, Singh A, Ahmad A, Sastry M. (2004) Nat Mater 3: 482. Shankar S S, Rai A, Ahmad A, Sastry M. (2004b) J Colloid Interface Sci 275:496. Maensiri S, Laokul P, Klinkaewnarong J, Phokha S, Promarak V, Seraphin S. (2008) J Optoelectron Adv Mater 10:161. Vilchis-Nestor A R, Sanchez-Mendieta V, Camacho-Lopez M A, Gomez-Espinosa R M, Camacho-Lopez M A, Arenas-Alatorre J A. (2008) Mater Lett 62:3103. Song J Y, Jang H K, Kim B S. (2009) Proc Biochem 44:1133. Song J Y, Kim B S. (2009) Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 32:79. Kadri A, Maiss E, Amsharov N, Bittner A M, Balci S, Kern K, Jeske H, Wege C. (2011) Virus Research 157:35-46. Aljabali A A A, Barclay J E, Lomonossoff G P, Evans D J. (2010) Nanoscale 2, 2596-2600. Balci, S, Hahn, K, Kopold, P, Kadri, A, Wege, C, Kern, K, and Bittner, A M. (2012) Nanotechnology 23. Knez M, Kadri A, Wege C, Gosele U, Jeske H, and Nielsch K. (2006) Nano Lett. 6, 1172-1177. Endo M, Wang H X, Fujitsuka M, and Majima T. (2006) Chemistry 12, 3735-3740. Shimizu T, Masuda M, and Minamikawa H. (2005). Chem Rev. 105, 1401-1443. Lee S Y, Lim J S, and Harris M T. (2012) Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109, 16-30. Bittner A M. (2005) Naturwissenschaften 92, 51-64. Dujardin E, Peet C, Stubbs G, Culver J N, and Mann S. (2003) Nano Lett 3, 413-417. Atanasova P, Rothenstein D, Schneider J J, Hoffmann R C, Dilfer S, Eiben S, Wege C, Jeske H, and Bill J. (2011) Adv. Mater. 23, 4918-4922. Chen X L, Gerasopoulos K, Guo J C, Brown A, Ghodssi R, Culver J N, and Wang C S. (2011) Electrochim. Acta 56, 5210-5213. Wu Z, Mueller A, Degenhard S, Ruff S E, Geiger F, Bittner A M, Wege C, and Krill C E. (2010). ACS Nano 4, 4531-8. Love, A. J., Chapman, S. N., Matic, S., Noris, E., Lomonossoff, G. P., Taliansky, M. In planta production of a candidate vaccine against bovine papillomavirus type 1. 2012. Planta. 236(4), 1305-13. Tan, N. T., Lee, Y., Wang, D. I. C. Uncovering the design rules for peptide synthesis of metal nanoparticles. 2010. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 5677-5686. Saunders, K., Sainsbury, F., Lomonossoff, G. P. 2009. Efficient generation of Cowpea mosaic virus empty virus-like particles by the proteolytic processing of precursors in insect cells and plants. Virology, 353, 329-337. Aljabali, A. A. A., Shah, S. N., Evans-Gowing, R., Lomonossoff, G. P., Evans, D. J. 2011. Chemically-coupled-peptide-promoted virus nanoparticle templated Mineralization. Integr. Biol., 2011, 3, 119-125. Lukman A I, Gong B, Marjo C E, Roessner U, Harris A T. (2011) J. Colloid Interface Sci 353:433-444. Lin L, Wang W, Huang J, Li Q Sun D, Yang X, Wang H, He N, Wang Y. (2010) Chem Eng J 162: 852-858. Das R K, Gogoi N, Bora U. (2011) Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 34: 615-619. Thuenemann E V, Lenzi P, Love A J, Taliansky M E, Becares M, Zuniga S, Enjuanes L, Zahmanova G G, Minkov I N, Matic S, Noris E, Meyers A, Hattingh A, Rybicki E P, Kiselev O I, Ravin N V, Eldarov M A, Skryabin K G, Lomonossoff G P. (2013). Curr Pharma Design 19:5564-5573. Nadagouda M N, Varma R S. (2008). Green Chem 10:859-862. Nadagouda M N, Castle A B, Murdock R C, Hussain S M, Varma R S. (2010). Green Chem 12:114-122. Njagi E C, mHuang H, Stafford L, Genuino H, Galindo H M, Collins J B, Hoag G E, Suib S L. (2010). Langmuir 27:264-271.