PISTON RING AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PISTON RING

Abstract

An unchamfered piston ring that is pre-treated by grit blasting to a defined roughness, followed by PVD coating with a metal nitride to a thickness of at least 10 μm, leaving peaks and valleys in the coated piston ring. The coated piston ring is then lapped to remove the peaks without penetrating the coating, so that valleys and plateaus remain in the coated surface. The resulting piston ring exhibits superior coating retention due to the increased surface area created by the grit blasting, and yet also superior performance, as the cavities remaining increase the porosity of the coating and thus enhance the lubrication of the ring.

Claims

1. A method for manufacturing a piston ring, comprising; providing a piston ring base having an unchamfered face surface, and a gap between two gap surfaces of the ring; grit blasting the face surface to create a roughened texture having an average surface roughness R.sub.a of 1.02-1.99 and Rz 6.28 to 9.05; depositing a coating on the roughened face surface and chamfer surface via physical vapor deposition, wherein the coating is applied at a thickness of at least 10 μm; and lapping the coating to remove peaks in the surfaces without penetrating the coating, so that the coated surfaces contain plateaus and valleys.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the grit blasting is applied with a grit size of between 120 and 220.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the grit is formed from a mixture of 120, 180 and 220 grit.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the grit blasting takes place at angles of 35° and 55° to the face surface of the piston ring.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the coating is a metal nitride.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the coating is a diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating.

7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising hardening the piston ring prior to grit blasting via a case hardening or through hardening process.

8. A piston ring comprising: a ring formed of a base material and having an unchamfered face surface that is surface roughened to a roughness average of between R.sub.a of 1.02-1.99 and Rz 6.28-9.05; a coating disposed on at least the face surface, the coating being deposited by physical vapor deposition and then lapped to remove peaks without penetrating the coating, so that the surface of the piston ring contains plateaus and valleys, wherein the coating has a thickness of at least 10 μm.

9. The piston ring according to claim 8, wherein the ring is made of steel that has been hardened via a case hardening or through hardening process.

10. The piston ring according to claim 8, wherein the coating is formed of a metal nitride or diamond-like carbon (DLC).

11. The piston ring according to claim 8, wherein the ring has two gap surfaces with a ring gap therebetween.

12. The piston ring according to claim 8, wherein a corner formed between the face surface and a top surface of the ring has a width is equal to or less than 0.05 mm.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0013] Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings are designed as an illustration only and not as a definition of the limits of the invention.

[0014] In the drawings, wherein similar reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views:

[0015] FIG. 1 shows a piston ring having a gap and an unchamfered surface;

[0016] FIG. 2 shows the face surface of the ring after grit blasting and coating;

[0017] FIG. 3 shows the face surface of the ring after lapping;

[0018] FIG. 4 shows the blast angles used during the grit blasting step of the invention;

[0019] FIG. 5 shows photographs demonstrating the surface roughness using grit of different sizes and combinations;

[0020] FIG. 6 shows photographs illustrating the surface roughness using 35° and 55° blast angles as compared to 5° and 30° blast angles;

[0021] FIGS. 7A-7E show comparisons of a surface treated with grits of various sizes and combinations, along with various blast angles;

[0022] FIGS. 8A and 8B show a comparison of the prior art chamfered ring gap to a chamferless ring of the present invention;

[0023] FIGS. 9A-9C show a comparison of various prior art chamfered ring gaps with the present invention;

[0024] FIGS. 10A-10B show a comparison of another prior art chamfered ring with the ring of the present invention; and

[0025] FIG. 11 shows a graph of blow-by results during engine testing for a chamferless vs. chamfered piston ring.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

[0026] Referring now in detail to the drawings, FIG. 1 shows a piston ring 10 according to the invention. Ring 10 has a face surface 11, a top surface 12, and a gap 13. Face surface 11 is treated with grit blasting, generally with a grit of various sizes, to lead to a surface having a series of peaks 14 and valleys 15, as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. A coating 20 is applied over the grit-blasted surface via physical vapor deposition (PVD) to a desired depth. Peaks 24 and valleys 25 are also in the coating. Then, as shown in FIG. 3, the peaks 24 of the coating are cut off via a lapping process to form plateaus 26 separated by valleys 25. By finding the optimal grit combinations and blasting angles, the piston ring of the present invention can be manufactured to exhibit high durability during high pressure situations, yet also exhibit high lubrication properties due to the porous nature of the coating. The coating allows for further geometry changes to the ring gap to reduce the amount of blow-by past the piston ring.

[0027] The preferred angles for grit blasting are shown in FIG. 4. Preferably an angle α of 35° to the face surface 11, and/or an angle β of 55° to the face surface 11 are used for the grit blasting process. These angles are preferred over smaller and larger angles, as they give a more regular surface effect, and allow for the creation of pockets in the surface of the ring. These pockets increase lubrication retention. A comparison of blast angles is shown in FIG. 6, where using identical grit, blast angles of 35° and 55° are compared to blast angles of 5° and 30° for the face surfaces of a piston ring according to the invention. As shown in FIG. 6, the blast angles of 35° and 55° show overall higher regularity in the surface, yet also allow for the creation of pockets in the surfaces.

[0028] FIG. 5 shows a comparison of surface textures of the face surface for various grit sizes and combinations. After experimentation, it was determined that a combination of grit sizes of 120/180/220 grit leads to the best surface regularity and roughness. The grit is used in a 1:1:1 ratio. The use of 120 grit media increases the overall roughness of the surface, while greater regularity is achieved with the addition of 220 grit media. The commonly used 320 grit media is shown for comparison. As can be seen, using grit between 120-180 leads to significantly rougher surfaces than when 320 grit is used.

[0029] FIGS. 7A-7E show comparisons of a surface treated with grits of various sizes and combinations, along with various blast angles. FIG. 7A shows the use of 320 grit and 5° and 30° blast angles. The treated surface is relatively smooth. FIG. 7B shows treatment with 180/220 grit at 35° and 55° blast angles. This leads to significantly rougher texture on the surface. In comparison, FIG. 7C uses the same blast angles, but increases the grit size to 120/180. This leads to an even rougher surface but with uneven peaks and valleys. The preferred 120/180/220 grit combination, with the preferred angles of 35° and 55° is shown in FIG. 7D. Here, the surface is uniformly roughened. Changing the blast angles to 5° and 30°, as shown in FIG. 7E, leads to less uniformity in the roughness.

[0030] Table 1 below illustrates the comparative average roughness using the various grit sizes and blast angles.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Face R.sub.a R.sub.z 320 0.30 2.12 5° and 30° 120/180 0.87 6.66 35° and 55° 180/220 1.02 6.99 35° and 55° 120/180/220 0.85 6.28 35° and 55° 120/180/220 1.99 9.05 5° and 30°

[0031] As can be seen above, the combination of 120/180/220 grit and the 35° and 55° blast angles gives a slightly lesser roughness in the face surface than 120/180 grit or different blast angles. This is optimal to create the best profile for performance of the rings. If the face surface is too rough, scuffing or bore marking of the cylinder liner can occur. However, for automotive applications, the removal of peaks through the lapping operation should be sufficient to eliminate this problem, as is supported by the results of the first engine test.

[0032] In addition, having a slightly smoother face surface is optimal for uniformity of coating thickness and minimization of lapping time. High face roughness will require more lapping to remove during manufacturing, adding cost and resulting in a coating which fluctuates between thick and thin—thick in valleys, thin where peaks have been lapped off. This might also require increased coating thickness in order for the thin spots to be thick enough, which would add further time and cost to the manufacturing process.

[0033] As shown in FIG. 5, using the 120/180/220 grit leads to more surface features than the 120/180 grit in both the face and chamfer region, and these features provide superior mechanical locking strength due to the increased roughness of the substrate while still providing for a manufacturing-friendly process.

[0034] The rings of the present invention were also tested to see if the grit blasting had any significant effect on light tightness, ring tension and the size of the free gap in the ring. 88.1 mm rings and 92.5 mm prototype pieces were tested. Piston rings having the variations of grit blasting as shown in FIGS. 7A-7E exhibited suitable light tightness and acceptable tension and ring gap sizes that varied only slightly from an untreated ring. Thus, the addition of grit up to 120 in size had negligible effects on the ring free gap and tension and no adverse effects on light tightness, yet had significant effects on the surface roughness of the ring face, giving the beneficial effects discussed above.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Free gap CD Tension Light Grit (mm) (N) Tightness None 12.64 23.5 good 320 12.51 23.5 good 180/220 12.56 23.1 good 120/180 12.17 22.6 good 120/180 (after 250° C.) 12.18 22.8 good 120/180/220 (35° and 55°) 11.97 22.3 good 120/180/220 (5° and 30°) 12.56 22.2 good

[0035] Table 3 illustrates tests run on 88.1 mm piston rings and 92.5 mm prototypes that were treated with grit blasting and subjected to heating for 5 hours at 250° C. to illustrate furnace conditions of a PVD chamber. As shown in the table this treatment had a negligible effect on the ring characteristics.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Diameter Free gap CD Tension Light (mm) Condition (mm) (N) Tightness 88.1 120/180 Blasted 12.17 22.6 good After 250° C. for 5 hrs 12.18 22.8 good 92.5 120/180 Blasted 14.18 21.4 good After 250° C. for 5 hrs 14.22 21.4 good

[0036] In addition, tests were conducted in an internal combustion engine, using the rings according to the invention. A minimum of 400 LSPI events occurred in the engine, with an average event pressure of about 190 bar. The rings according to the invention exhibited a 50% minimum area reduction in running face coating loss as compared to a standard ring treated with only 320 grit, and exhibited no scuffing or bore marking on the cylinder liner. In the exemplary form, the testing has exhibited 93% reduction in coating loss, demonstrating a significant improvement in adhesion strength.

[0037] FIG. 8A shows a magnified image of the ring ends of a prior art PVD piston ring, illustrating the large leak path of current PVD piston rings. The prior art piston ring includes a large chamfer to protect the ring ends and to reduce the likelihood of chipping of the coating at the ring ends. The ring ends are typically an area of the piston ring that have seen higher contact forces with the cylinder wall, and various chamfer shapes and radii have been used in an attempt to minimize any PVD coating damage in this area. The prior art ring as illustrated here uses a chamfer to protect the PVD coating from chipping near the ring gap, but also enlarges the gap and gas leak path of the piston ring.

[0038] The present invention further provides advantages associated with reducing the possibility of blow-by due to the smaller ring gap with the unchamfered geometry. Blow-by is commonly known as the amount of combustion gases, fuel, and lubricating oils that are able to pass the piston rings. The majority of this blow-by is commonly caused by the passage created at the ring gap. The ring gap previously required a chamfer to protect the coating edge and avoid chipping of the PVD coating, and the chamfer greatly increases the area of the ring gap, or leak path. Therefore, any reduction in the area of the ring gap reduces the propensity for blow-by, decreasing the amount of gas that is able to pass downward into the oil sump or oil passing upwards into the combustion chamber. The piston ring, when it is installed on the piston and compressed into the diameter of the cylinder liner, will decrease the ring gap, due to the compression of the piston ring, and this is known as the working gap of the piston ring.

[0039] The present invention and the unique coating increases adhesion, and allows for the piston ring to be manufactured without a chamfer, thereby decreasing the piston ring gap area. Therefore, the gas leak path area is greatly decreased, further reducing the possible blow-by gases into the combustion chamber.

[0040] One example of the current invention is illustrated in FIG. 8B, where the chamfer is minimized to the lower end of manufacturability and thereby greatly reduces the leak path area when compared to the ring of FIG. 8A. The ring of the invention utilizes the blast process as described above, and due to the improved adhesion, the chamfer may be removed from the piston ring, since chipping is no longer a concern with the improved locking feature of the blasting process discussed in detail above.

[0041] The chamfer leak path of the present invention is reduced from that of prior art by as much as 99%. The elimination of the chamfer on the ring ends reduces and minimizes the gas leak path and thereby minimizes the blow-by. FIGS. 9A, 9B and 9C all illustrate the further details of the changes from the prior art production in FIGS. 9A and 9B to the chamferless or unchamfered ring gap shown in FIG. 9C. Table 4 below further describes the reduction of the estimated leak path for one diameter of the rings from prior art as compared to an example of the subject invention.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Horizontal Veritcal Estimated Dimension Dimension Gas Leak Ring (μm) (μm) Path (μm.sup.2) FIG. 9A-left 187 119 11127 FIG. 9A-right 190 140 13300 FIG. 9A Estimated 24427 Total Gap FIG. 9B-left 158 67 5293 FIG. 9B-right 170 94 7990 FIG. 9B Estimated 13283 Total Gap FIG. 9C-left 6 14 42 FIG. 9C-right 14 7 48 FIG. 9C Estimated 91 Total Gap

[0042] FIG. 10A illustrates an enhanced image of a smaller chamfered prior art piston ring. The coating is a thermal spray, which is less prone to the risks of chipping due to the bonding of the molten coating, but even the smallest chamfer is significantly larger than the present invention as shown in see FIG. 10B. The chamfered ring includes a larger orifice area by 10% and 27% greater gas leak path. The smaller chamfered ring of FIG. 10A also exhibited blow-by (L/min) that was approximately 10% greater.

[0043] FIG. 10B is an enhanced image and illustrates the sharper chamferless corner at the ring gap. The coating is applied by a PVD process, and this geometry is possible without concern of chipping due to the improved adhesion of the coating process discussed above. The chamferless corner has a width equal to or less than 0.05 mm. This is a manufacturing tolerance for the straight end, and as close to a sharp corner as possible. The chamfer is measured via calculating the hypotenuse, from the two legs of the straight end. As illustrated in FIGS. 9A-9C, the chamfer is calculated using these legs and Pythagorean theorem, a.sup.2+b.sup.2=c.sup.2.

[0044] In one example, the chamferless or unchamfered rings reduce the blow-by by over 25% and reduce the working gap by 90%. The graph in FIG. 11 illustrates another example of the present invention, showing that the chamferless piston ring had an average decrease of 6% less blow-by than the baseline, and at higher engine RPMs, the decrease may be as high as 12%.

[0045] Accordingly, while only a few embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it is obvious that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.