SURGICAL JOINT IMPLANT AND A BONE-MOUNTABLE RIG

Abstract

A surgical joint implant has a cap in the form of at least two intersecting circles of the same diameter having an articular outer surface and an inner surface for bone adhesion. At the center of each circle a peg, for bone insertion into a hole of a nominal diameter, extends. One peg is slightly larger than said nominal diameter, to achieve an interference fit and the other peg is slightly thinner, to achieve a slide fit. A tubular drill rig open at both ends and having an interior circumference corresponding to the outer shape of the implant, can be mounted over the bone surface to be repaired. It accommodates a double drill for drilling, at the same time, a shallow hole of the diameter of the intersecting circle and a deeper narrow hole at the center of the circle of said nominal diameter.

Claims

1. Surgical The surgical joint implant having a cap with an articular outer surface and an inner surface adapted for bone adhesion, said cap having at least first and second pegs extending from said inner surface for anchoring said implant in a bone, characterized in that said at least first and second pegs have the same nominal diameter and that the diameter of said first peg deviates positively from said nominal diameter to provide an interference fit in relation to said nominal diameter and in that said second peg deviates negatively from said same nominal diameter to provide a clearance fit in relation to said same nominal diameter.

2. The surgical joint implant according to claim 1, wherein said first peg deviates from said nominal diameter to provide a force fit in relation to said nominal diameter.

3. The surgical joint implant according to claim 1, wherein said second peg deviates from said nominal diameter to provide a slide fit in relation to said nominal diameter.

4. The surgical joint implant according to claim 1, wherein a third peg which deviates from said nominal diameter to provide a slide fit in relation to said nominal diameter.

5. The surgical joint implant according to claim 1, wherein said cap has the form of two intersecting circles of the same diameter, said first and second pegs being disposed at the centers of the respective circles.

6. The surgical joint implant according to claim 4, wherein the cap has the form of three intersecting circles of the same diameter, said first, second and third pegs being disposed at the centers of the respective circles.

7. The surgical joint implant according to claim 1, wherein one of the pegs is significantly longer than the others.

8. The surgical joint implant according to claim 1, wherein said articular outer surface is individually custom-formed.

9. The surgical joint implant according to claim 1, wherein said inner surface adapted for bone adhesion and the surfaces of said pegs have an outer layer of a substance that promotes bone growth.

10. A rig for correct drilling and insertion of a surgical joint implant as claimed in claim 1, having a hollow tubular shell open at both ends, wherein the interior of said shell defines at least first and second intersecting right circular cylinders of equal diameter.

11. The rig according to claim 10, wherein the interior of said shell defines first, second and third intersecting right circular cylinders of equal diameter.

12. The rig according to claim 10, wherein an arcuate wall is selectively insertable into said shell interior to complete the full circumference, as desired, one of said right circular cylinders.

13. The rig according to claim 10, wherein the bone-engaging end of said hollow tubular shell is shaped to conform to the shape of the joint surface in which the implant is to be inserted.

14. The rig according to claim 10, wherein said rig is provided with multiple holes for pins anchoring the rig securely in place on the surface to be repaired.

Description

SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0012] The implant and rig of the invention will be described below with reference to a non-limiting example shown in the accompanying drawings of which,

[0013] FIG. 1 shows a two-pegged implant,

[0014] FIG. 2 shows a rig according to the invention for a two pegged implant. The rig is mounted in place on a femoral condyle.

[0015] FIG. 3a shows a three-pegged implant having the form of three identical intersecting circles.

[0016] FIG. 3b shows from above a rig with wall insert for a three-peg implant.

[0017] FIG. 4 shows a double drill for use with the drilling rig according to the invention.

[0018] FIG. 5a shows a pre-drilling guide socket.

[0019] FIG. 5b shows a drilling depth adjustment socket.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0020] FIG. 1 shows one exemplary implant according to the present invention, in this case for use in the repair of a damaged condylar surface of the human femur. It is contemplated that in certain applications of the invention the outer surface of cap 3 of the implant 1 will be shaped to conform to the undamaged shape of the patient's condyle. Standard sized and shaped implants will also be covered by the scope of the main claim. Such implants can also be used for many different joint surfaces in, for example, the joints of the hip, knee, toe and shoulder.

[0021] The implant 1 has a cap 3 with on its outside 41 a new joint surface and on its inside, in this particular embodiment, a ridge 47 which lodge in a drilled groove as will be explained below. The implant cap has the shape of two intersecting circles of the same diameter. Typical implants according to the invention may have a cap with two intersecting circles of diameter 15 mm. Other shapes which may be suitable are 17+17 mm, 20+20 mm and 25+25 mm. At the center of each circle there extends a peg 48, 49. Each peg has, in this particular embodiment, a narrower end 48a, 49a to aid in directing the pegs correctly into drilled holes in the condyle, as will be explained in more detail below.

[0022] In this case, the first peg 48 is longer than the second peg 49, but they can also be of the same length. According to the invention, both pegs are of the same nominal diameter, but the first peg 48 is slightly larger than the nominal diameter, providing an interference fit shaft of said nominal diameter. An anchoring interference fit between hard metal and living bone requires a greater differential than an interference fit between two metal elements. How much larger than the nominal diameter the first peg is will be a matter of clinical testing and revision. In this context involving a metal shaft in a hole in living bone and in the appended claims the term interference fit in relation to a nominal hole diameter is deemed to include positive differences up to and including approximately +11% increase in diameter over the nominal diameter. To get a very secure grip between a hole of a diameter of 4 mm in living bone and a peg of one of the materials described in the paragraph above, the peg should have a diameter of between ca 4.1 and 4.4 mm. An interference fit between hard metal and living bone requires a significantly larger difference than between a shaft and a hole of hard metal for example. The differential between the first peg diameter and the hole should not be so great as to require excessive force to put it in place with the risk of cracking in the bone. The second peg 49 has a diameter of the same nominal diameter but falling within the standard definitional boundaries for a clearance fit, i.e. almost of the same diameter but very slightly smaller. This relationship will ensure that the implant is securely anchored, is fairly easy to install, and will not give rise to problematic stresses between the pegs, either during implantation or thereafter.

[0023] FIG. 2 shows an example of a rig according to the present invention which is used for all of the hole preparation. The rig comprises an elongated hollow shell 51 having the form of two intersecting (overlapping) right circular cylinders 52, 53 of the same diameter. The rig can be formed to conform to the shape of the bone and cartilage area of the patient to be repaired or can be a standard rig. The rig is held securely in place on the condylar surface in this case by pins (not shown) driven in through holes 61, to hold the rig securely in place throughout the entire drilling process.

[0024] After the pins have been driven in, the cutting and drilling process can begin, with a wall insert 55 inserted in one end of the hollow shell, leaving an entire first right circular cylinder 52 at one end of the hollow tubular shell. At this time the surgeon may insert into the first right circular cylinder a depth adjustment socket 505 (FIG. 5b) and then a sharp cylindrical hand knife, sized exactly to the interior of the adjustment socket 505, make a preliminary circular sharp edged cut through the cartilage down to the bone. A circular bare bone area is left after this cartilage removal.

[0025] In one embodiment, the surgeon uses a 17/4 mm double drill as shown schematically in FIG. 4. It has a central narrow 4 mm diameter bit 401, and a wider 17 mm diameter cutting bit 402. The outer lateral surface 403 of the double drill conforms to a height adjustment socket placed inside the wall insert, which securely holds the double drill to drill, in the same operation, a central 4 mm hole for the first peg 48 and a much shallower surrounding bore 17 mm in diameter in this example. A pre-drilling of the initial part of the peg hole in the bone can be made using a guide socket 501 (FIG. 5a). This improves the exact placement of the simultaneous drilling of the peg hole and the circular bare-bone area with the double drill (FIG. 3). After removing the drill, and flushing out organic matter, the surgeon then slides the wall insert 53 out and inserts it in on the other side of the hollow shell, creating a complete right circular cylindrical guide hole on the opposite side of the hollow shell.

[0026] The surgeon then inserts the adjustment socket and uses the same cylindrical knife in the newly created guide hole, to make a circular excision of the cartilage (not a complete circle since the intersecting portion has already been removed in the previous step). The in this embodiment 17/4 mm double drill is then used again first with the guide socket 501 to pre-drill the peg hole and then with the adjustment socket 505 to double-drill the peg hole to its full depth and create the bare-bone circle , i.e. the 4 mm hole for the second peg and a second surrounding shallow bore which is of course also 17 mm in diameter.

[0027] These two drilling operations have created 4 mm peg holes and a space in the bone to exactly accommodate in this case a 17+17 implant of the invention. The wall insert 53 is then completely removed. A handle-equipped gauge corresponding to the intersecting circular forms making up the implant, is used to make sure that the holes have been drilled to the proper depth in the bone. The rig is then removed and the implant pegs are inserted into their holes. For the cap of the implant to lodge exactly in the in this case 17+17 shallow cavity removed from the surface of the bone it is usually necessary to carefully tap the cap, preferably on top of the first peg, with interference fit, with a hammer via a special mandrel. The first, slightly thicker peg, is tapped down into its hole while the second peg, slightly narrower, slides easily into its hole. The larger diameter part of the 17/4 mm drill in this example has a rim to excavate a peripheral slot slightly deeper than the 17 mm shallow cavity, to accommodate the peripheral ridge 47 of the implant, helping to hold the implant securely in place during healing and subsequent loading during use.

[0028] Thus the rig, which can be form-fitted to the shape of the individual patient's condyle in this example, is placed over the damaged area of the condyle and is anchored securely in place, in this particular non-limiting example, by driving in four pins (not shown) into holes 61 in the condyle shaped lower end of the rig 50. It is now securely in place for the entire drilling operation, which be simplified greatly and made much more exact and less dependent on the artistry of the surgeon, which may vary from day to day.

[0029] After drilling of the holes, the pins are pulled out and the rig is removed from the site, for implantation of the implant and reconstitution of the joint with the new implant.

[0030] It will be understood by the person skilled in the art that the rig as claimed can be supplemented with for example an insert sleeve to make one of the right circular cylinders of a small diameter, e.g. from 17 to 15 mm in diameter, to accommodate an implant having the form of two intersecting circles of slightly different diameters, for example 15+17 millimeters.

[0031] It will of course also be possible, within the scope of the invention to create an implant in the form of three, or more, intersecting circles, to cover bone damage of more irregular shape.

[0032] One such three-circle implant 101 is shown from below in FIG. 3a showing three pegs 148, 149 and 150. In this example peg 148 has an interference fit diameter in relation to the common nominal diameter of all three pegs and the other two pegs 149 and 150 have clearance fit diameters in relation to the common nominal diameter.

[0033] The rig for this three-circle implant is shown from above in FIG. 3b. The rig is held in place on the bone by pins (not shown) inserted through holes 161. The wall insert 155, completes the first right circular cylinder 152 covering the remaining portions of the other two right circular cylinders. When the first circular drilling has been made the wall insert 155 is pulled out, rotated 120 degrees and is inserted again to provide a drill guide for the next circle drilling with the same double drill, which in one embodiment can be the same 17/4 drill used together with the two-circle rig. After rotation 120 degrees again and drilling, a three pegged implant is inserted. As stated above, this insert has one peg which is of interference fit dimension in relation to its nominal diameter (in this case 4 mm) and the other two pegs are of clearance fit.

[0034] The implant has a bone contact surface on the underside, on the sides of the cap and on the pegs, which will be in direct contact with the bone tissue when the implant is in place. In one embodiment the bone contact surface comprises a biocompatible metal, metal alloy or ceramic, such as any of the metals, metal alloys or ceramic described above for the articulate surface. Preferably the bone contact surface comprises a cobalt chrome alloy (CoCr), a titanium alloy, titanium or stainless steel.

[0035] In one specific non-limiting embodiment the bone contact surface comprises, or in one specific non-limiting embodiment is coated with, a material that promotes osseointegration. In an alternative embodiment of the invention the bone contact surface does not comprise such a material and/or is uncoated.

[0036] The bioactive material or the material that promotes osseointegration of the bone contact surface, if present, preferably stimulates bone to grow into or onto the implant surface. Several materials that have a stimulating effect on bone growth are known and have been used to promote adherence between implants and bone. Examples of such prior art materials include bioactive glass, bioactive ceramics and biomolecules such as collagens, fibronectin, osteonectin and various growth factors. A commonly used material in the field of implant technology is hydroxyapatite (HA), chemical formula Ca.sub.10(PO.sub.4).sub.6(OH).sub.2. HA is the major mineral constituent of bone and is able to slowly bond with bone in vivo. HA coatings have been developed for medical implants to promote bone attachment. Another bioactive material commonly used in prior art is bioactive glass. Bioactive glasses, generally comprising SiO.sub.2, CaSiO.sub.3, P.sub.2O.sub.5, Na.sub.2O and/or CaO and possibly other metal oxides or fluorides, are able to stimulate bone growth faster than HA.

[0037] The fixation of the implant can also be improved by decreasing the catabolic processes i.e. decrease the amount of bone resorption next to the implant. The bone contact surface and/or the extending post can also be modified with bisphosphonates.

[0038] In one embodiment the bone contact surface is coated with a double coating. Such double coating may for instance comprise an inner coating comprising titanium (Ti). The second, outer coating, that is configured to contact the cartilage and or bone, is preferably a hydroxyapatite and/or beta tricalcium phosphate (TCP) coating. By this design even more long-term fixation of the implant is achieved, since bone in- or on-growth to the implant is further stimulated by the titanium, even if the more brittle hyroxyapatite would eventually shed/dissolve.

[0039] The bone contact surface may also be further modified with fluoro compounds or acid etching to enhance the bioactivity and the osseointegration of the surface. Another method to facilitate osseointegration is blasting of the bone contact surface.

[0040] FIG. 4 shows an exemplary 4/17 double drill for use with the multiple circle rigs described above (or with a previously known single circle rig). The double drill has a 4 mm central bit 401 for creating the hole for the peg and a wider cutting surface 402 for creating the 17 mm shallow hole. One of the advantages of the invention is that the same double drill can be used for single, double or triple (or more) intersecting circle shaped implants, used twice or three times as the case may be for the two embodiments shown here.