SURFACE-COATED CUTTING TOOL IN WHICH HARD COATING LAYER EXHIBITS EXCELLENT CHIPPING RESISTANCE

Abstract

The hard coating layer includes at least a complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer expressed by the composition formula (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y). The average Al content ratio x.sub.avg the average C content ratio y.sub.avg satisfy 0.60x.sub.avg0.95 and 0y.sub.avg0.005, respectively, each of the x.sub.avg and y.sub.avg is in atomic ratio. The crystal grains constituting the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer include a crystal grain having the NaCl face-centered cubic structure. A predetermined average crystal grain misorientation exists in the crystal grains having the NaCl face-centered cubic structure.

Claims

1. A surface-coated cutting tool comprising: a tool body made of tungsten carbide-based cemented carbide, titanium carbonitride-based cermet, or cubic boron nitride-based ultra-high pressure sintered material; and a hard coating layer provided on a surface of the tool body, wherein (a) the hard coating layer comprises at least a Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, which is deposited by a chemical vapor deposition method and has an average layer thickness of 1 m to 20 m; and an average content ratio x.sub.avg, which is an average content ratio of Al with respect to a total amount of Ti and Al in the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, and an average content ratio y.sub.avg, which is an average content ratio of C with respect to a total amount of C and N in the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, satisfy 0.60x.sub.avg0.95; and 0y.sub.avg0.005, respectively, in a case where a composition formula of the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is expressed by (Ti.sub.1-xAl)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y), each of the x.sub.avg and y.sub.avg is in atomic ratio, (b) the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer comprises at least a phase of Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride having a NaCl face-centered cubic structure, and (c) an area ratio of crystal grains having an average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more relative to the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is 40% or more, when crystal orientations of crystal grains of Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride having the NaCl face-centered cubic structure are analyzed along a vertical cross-sectional direction with an electron beam backscattering analyzer and the average crystal grain misorientation of the crystal grains is obtained.

2. The surface-coated cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is made of a single phase of Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride having the NaCl face-centered cubic structure.

3. The surface-coated cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein the hard coating layer includes at least 70 area % or more of a phase of Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride having the NaCl face-centered cubic structure.

4. The surface-coated cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein a lower layer of a Ti compound layer, which is made of one or more layers of: a Ti carbide layer; a Ti nitride layer; a Ti carbonitride layer; a Ti oxycarbide layer; and a Ti oxycarbonitride layer, is provided between the tool body and the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, an average total layer thickness of the lower layer being 0.1 m to 20 m.

5. The surface-coated cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein an upper layer including at least an aluminum oxide layer is formed on the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, an average total layer thickness of the upper layer being 1 m to 25 m.

6. The surface-coated cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is deposited by a chemical vapor deposition method using at least trimethyl aluminum as a reaction gas component.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0035] FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of the measurement method of the average crystal grain misorientation of crystal grains having the NaCl face-centered cubic structure (cubic) in the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer of the coated tool of the present invention.

[0036] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a film configuration showing the cross section of the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, which constitutes the hard coating layer of the surface-coated cutting tool of the present invention.

[0037] FIG. 3 shows an example of histogram of the area ratio of the average crystal grain misorientation (GOS value) in each of crystal grains having the cubic structure in a cross section of the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, which constitutes the hard coating layer of the coated tool 2 of the present invention, corresponding to an embodiment of the present invention. The vertical dotted line in the histogram indicates the boundary line where the average crystal grain misorientation is 2. Thus, bars on the right side of the vertical dotted line in FIG. 3 correspond to crystal grains having the average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more.

[0038] FIG. 4 shows an example of histogram of the area ratio of the average crystal grain misorientation (GOS value) in each of crystal grains having the cubic structure in a cross section of the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, which constitutes the hard coating layer of Comparative Coated Tool 2, corresponding to a coated tool of Comparative Example. The vertical dotted line in the histogram indicates the boundary line where the average crystal grain misorientation is 2. Thus, bars on the right side of the vertical dotted line in FIG. 4 correspond to crystal grains having the average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0039] Embodiments of the present invention are explained below.

[0040] Average layer thickness of the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer constituting the hard coating layer:

[0041] The hard coating layer of the surface-coated cutting tool of the present invention includes at least a Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer represented by the composition formula, (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) deposited by chemical vapor deposition. Although, this complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer has high hardness and excellent wear resistance, the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer exhibits the traits particularly well when the average layer thickness of the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is 1 m to 20 m. The reason for that is: if the average layer thickness were less than 1 m, sufficient wear resistance would not be obtained for a long-term usage due to the layer thickness being too thin; and if it exceeded 20 m, chipping would likely occur because crystal grains of the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer become easy to coarsen. Thus, the average layer thickness is set to 1 m to 20 m.

[0042] Composition of the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer constituting the hard coating layer:

[0043] In the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer constituting the hard coating layer of the surface-coated cutting tool of the present invention, x.sub.avg, which is the average content ratio of Al with respect to a total amount of Ti and Al, and y.sub.avg, which is an average content ratio of C with respect to a total amount of C and N, are adjusted to satisfy 0.60x.sub.avg0.95; and 0y.sub.avg0.005, respectively (each of the x.sub.avg and y.sub.avg is in atomic ratio).

[0044] The reason for these is that if the average Al content ratio x.sub.avg were less than 0.60, hardness of the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer would be deteriorated; and in the case where it is subjected to high-speed intermittent cutting of alloy steel or the like, its wear resistance would not be sufficient. On the other hand, if the average Al content ratio x.sub.avg exceeded 0.95, the average Ti content ratio would be decreased relatively. The reduction of the average Ti content ratio causes embrittlement to deteriorate chipping resistance. Thus, the average Al content ratio x.sub.avg is set to 0.60x.sub.avg0.95.

[0045] In addition, when the average content ratio y.sub.avg (in the atomic ratio) of the C component included in the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is in the trace amount in the range of 0y.sub.avg0.005, adhesion of the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer to the tool body or the lower layer is improved; and impact during cutting is absorbed by improvement of lubricity. As a result, defect resistance and chipping resistance of the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer are improved. On the other hand, if the average content ratio of the C component y were deviated from the range of 0y.sub.avg0.005, defect resistance and chipping resistance would be deteriorated reversely due to reduction of toughness of the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, and the deviation is not desirable. Thus, the average content ratio of the C component y.sub.avg is set to y.sub.avg0.005.

[0046] Average crystal grain misorientation of each of cubic crystal grains constituting the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer (GOS value):

[0047] First, the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is analyzed along the vertical cross-sectional direction at the interval of 0.1 m with an electron beam backscattering analyzer in the present invention. When there is crystal misorientation of 5 or more between adjacent measurement points P (hereinafter, refereed as pixels), the mid-parting line is defined as the grain boundary B as shown in FIG. 1. Then, the region surrounded by a single crystal boundary B is defined by one crystal grain. As an exemption, an independently-existing single pixel that has crystal misorientation of 5 or more to all of adjacent pixels is not regarded as a crystal grain. Only ones with connected pixels of 2 or more are regarded as a crystal grains.

[0048] Then, crystal misorientation is calculated in each of pixels in the crystal grain against to all of other pixels in the same crystal grain; and the averaged value of the calculated crystal misorientation is defined as the GOS value (Grain Orientation Spread). A schematic illustration is shown in FIG. 1. The GOS value is explained in detail in the document Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Series A, Vol. 71, No. 712 (2005 December), Article No. 05-0367, p 1722-1728, for example. The average crystal grain misorientation means this GOS value in the present specification. The mathematical formula expressing the GOS value is shown below. In the mathematical formula: n is the total number of pixels in the same crystal grain; i and j are unique numbers designated to each of different pixels in the crystal grains (1i, and jn, in the example shown in FIG. 1); .sub.ij(ij) is the crystal misorientation obtained from the crystal orientation in the pixel i and the crystal orientation in the pixel j.

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{GOS}=\frac{\underset{i,j=1}{\overset{n}{.Math.}}.Math..Math.{}_{\mathrm{ij}\left(ij\right)}}{n\left(n-1\right)}& \left[\mathrm{Mathematical}.Math..Math.\mathrm{formula}.Math..Math.1\right]\end{array}$

[0049] The histogram showing the area ratio of the average crystal grain misorientation can be made by: performing the measurement in the measurement range of 10 m of the width and the layer thickness of the length, along the vertical cross-sectional direction in five different view fields; obtaining the total number of pixels belonging to the cubic crystal grain constituting the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer; classing the average crystal grain misorientation with 1 incremental; tallying the number of pixels of crystal grains of each class of the average crystal grain misorientation; and dividing the each of tallied numbers by the above-mentioned total number of pixels. As a result, it is found that: crystal orientation in the crystal grain is not perfectly constant but varies somewhat; and based on the obtained histogram, the area ratio of crystal grains having the average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more relative to the entire Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is 40% or more as in the area ratio in the coated tool of the present invention (see FIGS. 3 and 4.)

[0050] As explained above, in the crystal grains constituting the Al and Ti complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer of the surface-coated cutting tool of the present invention, there is a larger extent of variation (deviation) of crystal orientation within the crystal grain compared to the crystal grains constituting the conventional TiAlN layer. In other words, there are strains in the crystal grains. These strains contribute to improvement of hardness and toughness.

[0051] A preferable area ratio of crystal grains having the average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more relative to the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is 45% to 70%. A more preferable area ratio of crystal grains having the average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more relative to the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is 50% to 65%. An even more preferable area ratio of crystal grains having the average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more relative to the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer is 55% to 60%.

[0052] Lower and Upper Layers:

[0053] Essentially, a sufficient technical effect can be obtained by the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer of the surface-coated cutting tool of the present invention. However, further more improved traits can be obtained by: providing the lower layer of a Ti compound layer, which is made of one or more layers of: a Ti carbide layer; a Ti nitride layer; a Ti carbonitride layer; a Ti oxycarbide layer; and a Ti oxycarbonitride layer, having the average total layer thickness of 0.1 m to 20 m; and/or providing the upper layer including at least an aluminum oxide layer having the average total layer thickness of 1 m to 25 m. In the case where the lower layer of a Ti compound layer, which is made of one or more layers of: a Ti carbide layer; a Ti nitride layer; a Ti carbonitride layer; a Ti oxycarbide layer; and a Ti oxycarbonitride layer, is provided, if the total average layer thickness of the lower layer were less than 0.1 m, a sufficient effect of the lower layer would not be obtained. If it exceeded 20 m, the crystal grains would become easy to coarsen; and chipping would likely occur. If the average total layer thickness of the upper layer including the aluminum oxide layer were less than 1 m, a sufficient effect of the upper layer would not be obtained. On the other hand, if it exceeded 25 m, the crystal grains would become easy to coarsen; and chipping would likely occur.

[0054] Crystal Structure of the Hard Coating Layer:

[0055] When the hard coating layer is a single phase of the cubic structure, the hard coating layer exhibits particularly excellent wear resistance. When the hard coating layer is not a single phase of the cubic structure, it is preferable that the phase of the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer having the cubic structure occupies 70 area % or more of the hard coating layer. When the area % of the cubic crystal grains is less than 70%, wear resistance of the hard coating layer tends to be deteriorated. On the other hand, when the area % is 70% or more, the hard coating layer exhibits excellent chipping resistance and wear resistance. The area ratio of the cubic crystal grains constituting the complex nitride or complex carbonitride is obtained by: analyzing the hard coating layer at the interval of 0.1 m, along the vertical cross-sectional direction with an electron beam backscattering analyzer; performing the measurement in the measurement range of 10 m of the width and the layer thickness of the length, along the vertical cross-sectional direction in five different view fields; obtaining the total number of pixels belonging to the cubic crystal grains constituting the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer; and basing on the ratio of the above-mentioned total number of pixels to the total number of measurement pixels of the five view fields on the hard coating layer.

[0056] A schematic diagram of the cross section of the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer constituting the hard coating layer of the surface-coated tool of the present invention is shown in FIG. 2.

[0057] Next, the coated tool of the present invention is explained with reference to Examples in detail.

Example 1

[0058] First, as raw material powders, the WC powder, the TiC powder, the TaC powder, the NbC powder, the Cr.sub.3C.sub.2 powder, and the Co powder, all of which had the average grain sizes of 1-3 m, were prepared. Then, these raw material powders were blended in the blending composition shown in Table 1. Then, wax was added to the blended mixture, and further mixed in acetone for 24 hours with a ball mill. After drying under reduced pressure, the mixtures were press-molded into green compacts with a predetermined shape under pressure of 98 MPa. Then, the obtained green compacts were sintered in vacuum in the condition of 5 Pa vacuum at the predetermined temperature in the range of 1370-1470 C. for 1 hour retention. After sintering, the tool bodies A-C, which had the insert-shape defined by ISO-SEEN1203AFSN and made of WC-based cemented carbide, were produced.

[0059] In addition, as raw material powders, the TiCN powder (TiC/TiN=50/50 in mass ratio), the Mo.sub.2C powder, the ZrC powder, the NbC powder, the WC powder, the Co powder, and the Ni powders, all of which had the average grain sizes of 0.5-2 m, were prepared. These raw material powders were blended in the blending composition shown in Table 2. Then, with a ball mill, the obtained mixtures were subjected to wet-mixing for 24 hours. After drying, the mixtures were press-molded into green compacts under pressure of 98 MPa. The obtained green compacts were sintered in the condition of: in nitrogen atmosphere of 1.3 kPa; at a temperature of 1500 C.; and for 1 hour of the retention time. After sintering, the tool body D, which had the insert-shape defined by ISO-SEEN1203AFSN and made of TiCN-based cermet, was produced.

[0060] Next, the coated tools of the present invention 1-15 were produced by forming the hard coating layers, which had the crystal grains having the cubic structure with the average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more in the area ratios shown in Table 7, and were made of the (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) layers having the intended layer thicknesses shown in Table 7. The hard coating layers were formed by performing the thermal CVD method on the surfaces of the tool bodies A to D with a chemical vapor deposition apparatus in the forming conditions A to J shown in Tables 4 and 5 for a predetermined time. As the gas groups A and B, the gas group A made of NH.sub.3 and H.sub.2 included 2.0%-3.0% of NH.sub.3 and 65%-75% of H.sub.2; and the gas group B made of TiCl.sub.4, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3, AlCl.sub.3, N.sub.2, and H.sub.2 included: 0.6%-0.9% of AlCl.sub.3, 0.2%-0.3% of TiCl.sub.4, 0%-0.5% of Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3, 12.5%-15.0% of N.sub.2, and balance H.sub.2. The pressure of the reaction atmosphere was 4.5 kPa-5.0 kPa. The temperature of the reaction atmosphere was 700 C.-900 C. As the way to supply each of the gas groups A and B, the supply period was 1 second to 5 seconds; the gas supply time per one period was 0.15 second to 0.25 second; and the phase difference of the gas supply of the gas groups A and B was 0.10 second to 0.20 second.

[0061] In regard to the coated tools 6 to 13 of the present invention, the lower layer shown in Table 6 and/or the upper layer shown in Table 7 were formed in the forming conditions shown in Table 3.

[0062] In addition, for a comparison purpose, the hard coating layers including at least the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer were deposited on the surfaces of the tool bodies A to D, in the conditions shown in Tables 3 to 5 and in the intended layer thicknesses (m) shown in Table 8 as in the coated tools of the present invention 1-15. At this time, the hard coating layers were formed in such a way that the reaction gas composition on the surfaces of the tool bodies were not changed during deposition of the (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) layer to produce the coated tools 1 to 13 of Comparative Examples.

[0063] In regard to coated tools 6-13 of Comparative Example, the lower layer shown in Table 6 and/or the upper layer shown in Table 8 were formed in the forming condition shown in Table 3, as in the coated tools 6 to 13 of the present invention.

[0064] For purpose of reference, the reference coated tools 14 and 15 shown in Table 8 were produced by depositing the (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) layers of the reference examples on the surfaces of the tool bodies B and D in the intended layer thicknesses with a standard physical vapor deposition by arc-ion plating.

[0065] The conditions for the arc-ion plating used for deposition in the reference example were as explained below.

[0066] (a) The tool bodies B and C were subjected to ultrasonic cleaning in acetone. Then, the cleaned tool bodies B and C in a dried state were set along the outer peripheral part in positions spaced away from the central axis in a predetermined distance in the radius direction on the rotating table in the arc-ion plating apparatus. As the cathode electrode (vaporization source), an AlTi alloy with a predetermined composition was placed.

[0067] (b) Inside of the apparatus was heated to 500 C. by a heater while retaining vacuum less than 10.sup.2 Pa by exhausting atmosphere in the apparatus. Then, direct current bias voltage of 1000V was applied to the tool bodies rotating and orbiting on the rotation table. At the same time, arc discharge was generated by flowing current of 200 A between the cathode electrode made of the AlTi alloy and the anode electrode. By following the procedure described above, Al and Ti ions were formed in the apparatus to perform bombard cleaning on the surfaces of the tool bodies.

[0068] (c) Next, direct current bias voltage of 50V was applied to the tool bodies rotating and orbiting on the rotating table while turning the atmosphere in the apparatus to the reaction atmosphere of 4 Pa by introducing nitrogen gas as a reaction gas in the apparatus. At the same time, arc discharge was generated by flowing current of 120 A between the cathode electrode (vaporization source) made of the AlTi alloy and the anode electrode. By following above-described procedure, the (Ti, Al)N layers with the intended compositions and the intended average layer thicknesses shown in Table 7 were deposited on the surfaces of the tool bodies and the coated tools of the reference example 14 and 15 were produced.

[0069] The vertical cross sections to the tool bodies of each constituent layer of: the coated tools of the present invention 1-15; cutting tools 1-13 of Comparative Example; and the reference coated tools 14 and 15, were measured by using a scanning electron microscope (magnifying power: 5000). The average layer thicknesses were obtained by averaging layer thicknesses measured at 5 points within the observation viewing field. In any measurement, the obtained average layer thickness was practically the same as the intended layer thicknesses shown in Tables 6 to 8.

[0070] In regard to the average Al content ratio, x.sub.avg, of the complex nitride layer or the complex carbonitride layer, an electron beam was irradiated to the samples by using EPMA (Electron-Probe-Micro-Analyser). Then, the average Al content ratio, x.sub.avg, was obtained from 10-point average of the analysis results of the characteristic X-ray in the surface-polished samples. The average C content ratio, y.sub.avg, was obtained by secondary-ion-mass-spectroscopy (SIMS). An ion beam was irradiated on the range of 70 m70 m from the front surface side of the sample. In regard to the components released by sputtering effect, concentration measurement in the depth direction was performed. The average C content ratio, y.sub.avg, indicates the average value in the depth direction of the Ti and Al complex nitride layer or complex carbonitride layer. In the C content ratio, the C content ratio inevitably included without intended usage of the gas including C as the gas raw material was excluded. More specifically, the content ratio of the C component (in the atomic ratio) in the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer when the supply amount of Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3 was set to 0 was obtained as the inevitable C content ratio. Then, the value of the content ratio of the C component (in the atomic ratio) in the complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer obtained when Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3 was intentionally supplied subtracted by the above-described inevitable C component ratio was obtained as y.sub.avg.

[0071] Then, crystal orientation of each of crystal grains having the cubic structure constituting the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, was analyzed along the vertical cross-sectional direction with an electron beam backscattering analyzer. When there was crystal misorientation of 5 or more between adjacent pixels, the mid-parting line was defined as the grain boundary, and the region surrounded by a single boundary was defined by one crystal grain. Then, the average crystal grain misorientation between a pixel in the crystal grain and all of other pixels in the same crystal grains was obtained. Mapping was performed by classing the obtained average crystal grain misorientation in every 1 in the range from 0 to 10, such as: more than 0 to less than 1; more than 1 to less than 2; more than 2 to less than 3; more than 3 to less than 4; and the like. Based on the mapping diagram, the area ratio of the crystal grains having the average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more occupying the entire Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer was obtained. The results are shown in Tables 7 and 8.

[0072] An example of the histogram of the average crystal gain misorientation measured in the coated tool 2 of the present invention is shown in FIG. 3. In addition, an example of the histogram of the average crystal gain misorientation measured in the coated tool 2 of Comparative Example is shown in FIG. 4.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Blending composition (mass %) Type Co TiC TaC NbC Cr.sub.3C.sub.2 WC Tool A 8.0 1.5 3.0 0.4 balance body B 8.5 1.8 0.2 balance C 7.0 balance

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Blending composition (mass %) Type Co Ni ZrC NbC Mo.sub.2C WC TiCN Tool D 8 5 1 6 6 10 balance body

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Layer constituting the hard Forming condition (pressure and temperature of the reaction coating layer atmosphere are shown as kPa and C., respectively) Formation Reaction atmosphere Type symbol Reaction gas composition Pressure Temperature (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) TiAlCN TiAlCN Refer Table 4 layer Ti compound TiC TiC TiCl.sub.4: 4.2%, CH.sub.4: 8.5%, H.sub.2: balance 7 1020 layer TiN TiN-1 TiCl.sub.4: 4.2%, N.sub.2: 30%, H.sub.2: balance 30 900 TiN-2 TiCl.sub.4: 4.2%, N.sub.2: 35%, H.sub.2: balance 50 950 TiN-3 TiCl.sub.4: 4.2%, N.sub.2: 30%, H.sub.2: balance 30 780 1-TiCN 1-TiCN-1 TiCl.sub.4: 2%, CH.sub.3CN: 0.7%, N.sub.2: 10%, H.sub.2: balance 7 900 1-TiCN-2 TiCl.sub.4: 2%, CH.sub.3CN: 0.7%, N.sub.2: 10%, H.sub.2: balance 7 780 TiCN TiCN TiCl.sub.4: 2%, CH.sub.4: 1%, N.sub.2: 15%, H.sub.2: balance 13 950 TiCO TiCO TiCl.sub.4: 4.2%, CO: 4%, H.sub.2: balance 7 950 TiCNO TiCNO TiCl.sub.4: 2%, CO: 1%, CH.sub.4: 1%, N.sub.2: 5%, H.sub.2: balance 13 950 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 layer Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 AlCl.sub.3: 2.2%, CO.sub.2: 5.5%, HCl: 2.2%, 7 950 H.sub.2S: 0.2%, H.sub.2: balance

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Forming condition Formation of the hard coating layer (The reaction gas composition indicates the ratio to the sum of gas groups A and B) Formation Reaction gas composition of Process type symbol the gas group A (volume %) Reaction gas composition of the gas group B (volume %) Deposition process A NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.7%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.2%, N.sub.2: 13%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance in the present B NH.sub.3: 3.0%, H.sub.2: 75% AlCl.sub.3: 0.7%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 15%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance invention C NH.sub.3: 2.0%, H.sub.2: 65% AlCl.sub.3: 0.9%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 14%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0.5%, H.sub.2: balance D NH.sub.3: 3.0%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.6%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.2%, N.sub.2: 12.5%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance E NH.sub.3: 2.0%, H.sub.2: 75% AlCl.sub.3: 0.8%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 13%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance F NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 65% AlCl.sub.3: 0.7%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 14.5%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0.2%, H.sub.2: balance G NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.6%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.2%, N.sub.2: 13.5%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance H NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.9%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.2%, N.sub.2: 12.8%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance I NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.6%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 13.5%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0.4%, H.sub.2: balance J NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.8%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 14%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance Deposition process A NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.7%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.2%, N.sub.2: 13%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance in Comparative B NH.sub.3: 3.0%, H.sub.2: 75% AlCl.sub.3: 0.7%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 15%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance Example C NH.sub.3: 2.0%, H.sub.2: 65% AlCl.sub.3: 0.9%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 14%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0.5%, H.sub.2: balance D NH.sub.3: 3.0%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.6%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.2%, N.sub.2: 12.5%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance E NH.sub.3: 2.0%, H.sub.2: 75% AlCl.sub.3: 0.8%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 13%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance F NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 65% AlCl.sub.3: 0.7%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 14.5%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0.2%, H.sub.2: balance G NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.6%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.2%, N.sub.2: 13.5%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance H NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.9%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.2%, N.sub.2: 12.8%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance I NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.6%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 13.5%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0.4%, H.sub.2: balance J NH.sub.3: 2.5%, H.sub.2: 70% AlCl.sub.3: 0.8%, TiCl.sub.4: 0.3%, N.sub.2: 14%, Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3: 0%, H.sub.2: balance

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Forming condition (Pressure and temperature of the reaction atmosphere are shown as kPa and C., respectively) Formation of the Gas group A Gas group B Phase difference hard coating layer Supply Supply time per Supply Supply time per between the Reaction atmosphere Formation period one period period one period gas groups A and B Pres- Temper- Process type symbol (second) (second) (second) (second) (second) sure ature Deposition A 1 0.2 1 0.2 0.1 4.7 800 process B 3 0.15 3 0.15 0.15 4.5 800 in the present C 2 0.25 2 0.25 0.2 5 700 invention D 5 0.2 5 0.2 0.1 4.7 800 E 4 0.2 4 0.2 0.15 5 850 F 2.5 0.2 2.5 0.2 0.2 4.5 800 G 1.5 0.15 1.5 0.15 0.2 4.7 700 H 1.2 0.25 1.2 0.25 0.1 4.7 900 I 4.5 0.2 4.5 0.2 0.15 4.7 800 J 2.5 0.2 2.5 0.2 0.2 4.7 750 Deposition A 4.7 800 process in B 4.5 800 Comparative C 5 700 Example D 4.7 800 E 5 850 F 4.5 800 G 4.7 700 H 4.7 900 I 4.7 800 J( 4.7 750

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Hard coating layer (the number at the bottom indicates the intended average layer thickness (m) of the layer) Tool body Lower layer Type symbol 1st layer 2nd layer 3rd layer Coated tool of the present invention, 1 A coated tool of Comparative Example, 2 B and reference coated tool 3 C 4 D 5 A 6 B TiC (0.5) 7 C TiN-1 (0.3) 8 D TiN-1 1-TiCN-1 (0.5) (4) 9 A TiN-1 1-TiCN-1 TiCN (0.3) (2) (0.7) 10 B 11 C TiN-1 (0.5) 12 D TiC (1) 13 A TiN-1 (0.1) 14 B 15 C

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Hard coating layer Ti and Al complex nitride, carbonitride layer (Ti.sub.1xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1y) Upper layer Formation Area (Numbers at the bottom symbol of Area ratio of crystal ratio indicate the average TiAlCN Al C grains having the of the Intended intended layer thickness Tool deposition content content average crystal grain cubic layer (m) of the layer) body process (refer ratio ratio misorientation crystals thickness 1st 2nd Type symbol Tables 4 and 5) x y of 2 or more (%) (%) (m) layer layer Coated tool 1 A A 0.95 less than 58 100 5 of the present 0.0001 invention 2 B B 0.76 less than 56 100 6 0.0001 3 C C 0.79 0.0015 40 100 1 4 D D 0.75 less than 67 100 8 0.0001 5 A E 0.93 less than 45 85 3 0.0001 6 B F 0.67 0.0028 56 100 4 7 C G 0.83 less than 64 100 6 0.0001 8 D H 0.93 less than 43 72 2 0.0001 9 A I 0.68 0.0046 54 100 7 10 B J 0.60 less than 68 98 5 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (2.5) 11 C A 0.95 less than 72 99 4 TiCN Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (0.5) (3) 12 D B 0.76 less than 64 96 3 TiCO Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (1) (2) 13 A C 0.79 0.0018 51 97 1 TiCNO Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (0.3) (1) 14 B D 0.75 less than 49 100 10 0.0001 15 C E 0.93 less than 63 83 3 0.0001

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Hard coating layer Ti and Al complex nitride, carbonitride layer (Ti.sub.1xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1y) Upper layer Formation Area (Numbers at the bottom symbol of Area ratio of crystal ratio indicate the average TiAlCN Al C grains having the of the Intended intended layer thickness Tool deposition content content average crystal grain cubic layer (m) of the layer) body process (refer ratio ratio misorientation crystals thickness 1st 2nd Type symbol Tables 4 and 5) x y of 2 or more (%) (%) (m) layer layer Coated tool of 1 A A 0.92 less than 9 100 5 Comparative 0.0001 Example 2 B B 0.78 less than 12 100 6 0.0001 3 C C 0.82 0.0016 0 100 1 4 D D 0.73 less than 15 100 8 0.0001 5 A E 0.92 less than 4 81 3 0.0001 6 B F 0.69 0.0024 7 100 4 7 C G 0.81 less than 8 100 6 0.0001 8 D H 0.89 less than 2 70 2 0.0001 9 A I 0.65 0.0043 5 100 7 10 B J 0.60 less than 11 99 5 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (2.5) 11 C A 0.93 less than 14 98 4 TiCN Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (0.5) (3) 12 D B 0.79 less than 17 96 3 TiCO Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (1) (2) 13 A C 0.81 0.0021 5 98 1 TiCNO Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (0.3) (1) Reference 14 B AIP 0.50 less than 1 100 5 coated tool 0.0001 15 C AIP 0.59 less than 2 100 3 0.0001 AIP indicates deposition by using the arc ion plating.

[0073] Next, each of the coated tools described above was clamped on the face milling cutter made of tool steel with the cutter diameter of 125 mm by a fixing jig. Then, the center cut cutting test of high speed dry face milling was performed on the coated tools of the present invention 1-13; the coated tools 1-8 and 11-15 of Comparative Example; and the reference coated tools 14 and 15, in the clamped-state. The center cut cutting test of high speed dry face milling is a type of high speed intermittent cutting of alloy steel, and was performed under the condition shown below. After the test, width of flank wear of the cutting edge was measured. Results are shown in Table 9.

[0074] Tool body: Tungsten carbide-based cemented carbide; Titanium carbonitride-based cermet

[0075] Cutting test: High speed dry face milling; Center cut cutting test

[0076] Work: Block material of JIS-SCM440 standard having width of 100 mm and length of 400 mm

[0077] Rotation speed: 968 min.sup.1

[0078] Cutting speed: 380 m/min

[0079] Cutting depth: 1.2 mm

[0080] Feed rate per tooth: 0.1 mm/tooth

[0081] Cutting time: 8 minutes

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Width of Cutting test flank wear result Type (mm) Type (minute) Coated tool of the 1 0.09 Coated tool of 1 4.2* present invention 2 0.10 Comparative 2 3.2* 3 0.07 Example 3 3.4* 4 0.14 4 2.2* 5 0.08 5 4.6* 6 0.12 6 3.7* 7 0.09 7 4.4* 8 0.12 8 2.3* 9 0.11 9 3.6* 10 0.09 10 4.3* 11 0.09 11 4.8* 12 0.13 12 2.3* 13 0.11 13 4.0* 14 0.11 Reference coated 14 1.8* 15 0.08 tool 15 1.6* Asterisk marks (*) in the column of coated tools of Comparative Example and reference coated tools indicate cutting time (min) until they reached to their service lives due to occurrence of chipping.

Example 2

[0082] First, as raw material powders, the WC powder, the TiC powder, the ZrC powder, the TaC powder, the NbC powder, the Cr.sub.3C.sub.2 powder, the TiN powder, and the Co powder, all of which had the average grain sizes of 1-3 m, were prepared. Then, these raw material powders were blended in the blending composition shown in Table 10. Then, wax was added to the blended mixture, and further mixed in acetone for 24 hours with a ball mill. After drying under reduced pressure, the mixtures were press-molded into green compacts with a predetermined shape under pressure of 98 MPa. Then, the obtained green compacts were sintered in vacuum in the condition of 5 Pa vacuum at the predetermined temperature in the range of 1370-1470 C. for 1 hour retention. After sintering, by performing honing work of R: 0.07 mm on their cutting edge parts, the tool bodies -, which had the insert-shape defined by ISO-CNMG120412 and made of WC-based cemented carbide, were produced.

[0083] In addition, as raw material powders, the TiCN powder (TiC/TiN=50/50 in mass ratio), the NbC powder, the WC powder, the Co powder, and the Ni powders, all of which had the average grain sizes of 0.5-2 m, were prepared. These raw material powders were blended in the blending composition shown in Table 11. Then, with a ball mill, the obtained mixtures were subjected to wet-mixing for 24 hours. After drying, the mixtures were press-molded into green compacts under pressure of 98 MPa. The obtained green compacts were sintered in the condition of: in nitrogen atmosphere of 1.3 kPa; at a temperature of 1500 C.; and for 1 hour of the retention time. After sintering, by performing honing work of R: 0.07 mm on their cutting edge parts, the tool body , which had the insert-shape defined by ISO-CNMG120412 and made of TiCN-based cermet, was produced.

[0084] Next, the coated tools of the present invention 16-30 shown in Table 12 were produced by depositing the hard coating layers including at least the (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) layer in the intended layer thicknesses on the surfaces of the tool bodies - and the tool body in the conditions shown in Tables 3 to 5 with a chemical vapor deposition apparatus in the same manner as Example 1.

[0085] In regard to the coated tools 19 to 28 of the present invention, the lower layer shown in Table 12 and/or the upper layer shown in Table 13 were formed in the forming conditions shown in Table 3.

[0086] In addition, for a comparison purpose, the coated tools 16 to 28 shown in Table 14 of Comparative Example were produced by depositing the hard coating layers on the surfaces of the tool bodies - and the tool body with a chemical vapor deposition apparatus, in the conditions shown in Tables 3 to 5 and in the intended layer thicknesses shown in Table 14 in the same manner as the coated tools of the present invention.

[0087] In regard to coated tools 19-28 of Comparative Example, the lower layer shown in Table 12 and/or the upper layer shown in Table 14 were formed in the forming condition shown in Table 3, as in the coated tools 19 to 28 of the present invention.

[0088] For purpose of reference, the reference coated tools 29 and 30 shown in Table 14 were produced by depositing the (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) layers of the reference examples on the surfaces of the tool bodies and in the intended layer thicknesses with a standard physical vapor deposition by arc-ion plating.

[0089] The conditions for the arc-ion plating used for deposition in the reference example were as in Example 1.

[0090] The cross sections of each constituent layer of: the coated tools of the present invention 16 to 30; cutting tools 16-28 of Comparative Example; and the reference coated tools 29 and 30, were measured by using a scanning electron microscope (magnifying power: 5000). The average layer thicknesses were obtained by averaging layer thicknesses measured at 5 points within the observation viewing field. In any measurement, the obtained average layer thickness was practically the same as the intended layer thicknesses shown in Tables 12 to 14.

[0091] Then, crystal orientation of each of crystal grains having the cubic structure constituting the Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer, was analyzed along the vertical cross-sectional direction with an electron beam backscattering analyzer. Mapping was performed by classing the obtained average crystal grain misorientation in every 1 in the range from 0 to 10, such as: more than 0 to less than 1; more than 1 to less than 2; more than 2 to less than 3; more than 3 to less than 4; and the like. Based on the mapping diagram, the area ratio of the crystal grains having the average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more occupying the entire Ti and Al complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer was obtained. The results are shown in Tables 13 and 14.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Blending composition (mass %) Type Co TiC ZrC TaC NbC Cr.sub.3C.sub.2 TiN WC Tool 6.5 1.5 2.9 0.1 1.5 balance body 7.6 2.6 4.0 0.5 1.1 balance 6.0 balance

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Blending composition (mass %) Type Co Ni NbC WC TiCN Tool body 11 4 6 15 balance

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Hard coating layer (the number at the bottom indicates the intended average layer thickness (m) of the layer) Tool Lower layer body 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Type symbol layer layer layer layer Coated tool of the present 16 invention, coated tool of 17 Comparative Example, and 18 reference coated tool 19 TiC (0.5) 20 TiN-1 (0.1) 21 TiN-1 1-TiCN-1 (0.5) (7) 22 TiN-1 1-TiCN-1 TiN-2 (0.3) (10) (0.7) 23 TiN-1 1-TiCN-1 TiCN TiN-2 (0.3) (4) (0.4) (0.3) 24 25 TiN-1 (0.5) 26 TiC (1) 27 TiN-1 (0.1) 28 TiN-1 (0.1) 29 30

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Hard coating layer Ti and Al complex nitride, carbonitride layer (Ti.sub.1xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1y) Upper layer Formation Area (Numbers at the bottom symbol of Area ratio of crystal ratio indicate the average TiAlCN Al C grains having the of the Intended intended layer thickness Tool deposition content content average crystal grain cubic layer (m) of the layer) body process (refer ratio ratio misorientation crystals thickness 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Type symbol Tables 4 and 5) x y of 2 or more (%) (%) (m) layer layer layer layer Coated tool 16 A 0.95 less than 49 100 6 of the present 0.0001 invention 17 B 0.76 less than 56 100 2 0.0001 18 C 0.79 0.0019 40 100 7 19 D 0.75 less than 71 100 12 0.0001 20 E 0.93 less than 62 79 16 0.0001 21 F 0.67 0.0029 47 100 8 22 G 0.83 less than 58 95 20 TiN-2 0.0001 (0.7) 23 H 0.93 less than 63 72 15 TiCN TiN-2 0.0001 (0.4) (0.3) 24 I 0.68 0.0039 68 96 3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (2) 25 J 0.60 less than 57 95 7 TiCN Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (0.5) (2.5) 26 A 0.95 less than 43 98 4 TiCO Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (1) (2) 27 B 0.76 less than 58 96 11 TiCNO Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (0.3) (1) 28 C 0.79 0.0017 46 93 5 TiN-2 TiCN TiCNO Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (0.3) (0.8) (0.3) (3) 29 D 0.75 less than 63 100 16 0.0001 30 E 0.93 less than 55 83 9 0.0001

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Hard coating layer Ti and Al complex nitride, carbonitride layer (Ti.sub.1xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1y) Upper layer Formation Area (Numbers at the bottom symbol of Area ratio of crystal ratio indicate the average TiAlCN Al C grains having the of the Intended intended layer thickness Tool deposition content content average crystal grain cubic layer (m) of the layer) body process (refer ratio ratio misorientation crystals thickness 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Type symbol Tables 4 and 5) x y of 2 or more (%) (%) (m) layer layer layer layer Coated tool of 16 A 0.92 less than 4 100 6 Comparative 0.0001 Example 17 B 0.78 less than 7 100 2 0.0001 18 C 0.82 0.0023 0 100 7 19 D 0.73 less than 13 100 12 0.0001 20 E 0.92 less than 9 76 16 0.0001 21 F 0.69 0.0036 4 100 8 22 G 0.81 less than 9 96 20 TiN-2 0.0001 (0.7) 23 H 0.89 less than 15 68 15 TiCN TiN-2 0.0001 (0.4) (0.3) 24 I 0.65 0.0044 7 98 3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (2) 25 J 0.60 less than 12 93 7 TiCN Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (0.5) (2.5) 26 A 0.93 less than 2 99 4 TiCO Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (1) (2) 27 B 0.79 less than 7 95 11 TiCNO Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.0001 (0.3) (1) 28 C 0.81 0.0018 3 94 5 TiN-2 TiCN TiCNO Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (0.3) (0.8) (0.3) (3) Reference 29 AIP 0.50 less than 2 100 16 coated tool 0.0001 30 AIP 0.59 less than 3 100 9 0.0001 AIP indicates deposition by using the arc ion plating.

[0092] Next, each coated tool described above was screwed on the tip of the insert holder made of tool steel by a fixing jig. Then, the dry high speed intermittent cutting test of carbon steel and the wet high speed intermittent cutting test of cast iron explained below were performed on the coated tools of the present invention 16-30; the coated tools 16-28 of Comparative Example; and the reference coated tools 29 and 30. After the tests, width of flank wear of the cutting edge was measured in each test.

[0093] Cutting condition 1:

[0094] Work: Round bar in JIS-S45C standard with 4 evenly spaced slits in the longitudinal direction

[0095] Cutting speed: 370 m/min.

[0096] Cutting depth: 1.2 mm

[0097] Feed rate: 0.2 mm/rev.

[0098] Cutting time: 5 minutes

[0099] (the normal cutting speed is 220 m/min)

[0100] Cutting condition 2:

[0101] Work: Round bar in JIS-FCD700 standard with 4 evenly spaced slits in the longitudinal direction

[0102] Cutting speed: 320 m/min.

[0103] Cutting depth: 1.2 mm

[0104] Feed rate: 0.1 mm/rev.

[0105] Cutting time: 5 minutes

[0106] (the normal cutting speed is 180 m/min)

[0107] Results of the cutting test are shown in Table 15.

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Width of flank wear Cutting test result (mm) (minute) Cutting Cutting Cutting Cutting condition condition condition condition Type 1 2 Type 1 2 Coated tool 16 0.20 0.23 Coated tool of 16 3.1* 4.1* of the present 17 0.22 0.24 Comparative 17 3.8* 3.1* invention 18 0.25 0.23 Example 18 3.9* 4.7* 19 0.22 0.13 19 4.5* 4.8* 20 0.22 0.10 20 2.3* 2.1* 21 0.20 0.22 21 4.2* 2.0* 22 0.25 0.21 22 1.9* 4.5* 23 0.23 0.22 23 3.1* 3.1* 24 0.10 0.26 24 4.7* 3.8* 25 0.26 0.23 25 4.8* 3.9* 26 0.23 0.22 26 4.3* 4.5* 27 0.22 0.22 27 2.9* 2.3* 28 0.21 0.22 28 4.8* 4.2* 29 0.22 0.20 Reference 29 2.1* 1.9* 30 0.12 0.25 coated tool 30 2.0* 1.8* Astensk marks (*) in the column of coated tools of Comparative Example and reference coated tools indicate cutting time (min) until they reached to their service lives due to occurrence of chipping.

Example 3

[0108] First, as raw material powders, the cBN powder, the TiN powder, the TiC powder, the Al powder, and the Al.sub.2O.sub.3 powder, all of which had the average grain sizes of 0.5-4 m, were prepared. Then, these raw material powders were blended in the blending composition shown in Table 16. Then, the blended mixtures were wet-mixed for 80 hours with a ball mill. After drying, the mixtures were press-molded into green compacts having the dimension of: 50 mm of the diameter and 1.5 mm of the thickness under pressure of 120 MPa. Then, the obtained green compacts were sintered in vacuum in the condition of 1 Pa vacuum at the predetermined temperature in the range of 900-1300 C. for 60 minutes retention to obtain preliminary sintered bodies for the cutting edge pieces. The obtained preliminary sintered bodies were placed on separately prepared supporting pieces made of WC-based cemented carbide, which had the composition of: 8 mass % of Co; and the WC balance, and the dimension of: 50 mm of the diameter; and 2 mm of the thickness. They were inserted into a standard ultra-high pressure sintering apparatus in the stacked state. Then, they were subjected to ultra-high-pressure sintering in the standard condition of: 4 GPa of pressure; a predetermined temperature within the range of 1200-1400 C.; and 0.8 hour of the retention time. Then, the top and bottom surfaces of the sintered bodies were grinded by using a diamond grind tool. Then, they were divided into a predetermined dimension with a wire-electrical discharge machine. Then, they were brazed on the brazing portion (corner portion) of the insert body made of WC-based cemented carbide, which had the composition of: 5 mass % of Co; 5 mass % of TaC; and the WC balance, and the shape defined by ISO CNGA120412 standard (the 80 diamond shape of: thickness of 4.76 mm; and inscribed circle diameter of 12.7 mm) by using the brazing material made of TiZrCu alloy having composition made of: 37.5% of Zr; 25% of Cu; and the Ti balance in volume %. Then, after performing outer peripheral machining into a predetermined dimension, the cutting edges of the brazed parts were subjected to a honing work of: 0.13 mm of the width; and 25 of the angle. Then, by performing the final polishing on them, the tool bodies 2A and 2B with the insert shape defined by ISO CNGA120412 standard were produced.

TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Blending composition (mass %) Type TiN TiC Al Al.sub.2O.sub.3 cBN Tool 2A 50 5 3 balance body 2B 50 4 3 balance

[0109] Next, the coated tools of the present invention 31-40 shown in Table 18 were produced by depositing the hard coating layers including at least the (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) layer in the intended layer thicknesses on the surfaces of the tool bodies 2A and 2B in the conditions shown in Tables 3 to 5 with a chemical vapor deposition apparatus in the same manner as Example 1.

[0110] In regard to the coated tools 34 to 38 of the present invention, the lower layer shown in Table 17 and the upper layer shown in Table 18 were formed in the forming conditions shown in Table 3.

[0111] In addition, for a comparison purpose, the coated tools 31 to 38 shown in Table 19 of Comparative Example were produced by depositing the hard coating layers including at least the (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) layer on the surfaces of the tool bodies 2A and 2B with a chemical vapor deposition apparatus, in the conditions shown in Tables 3 to 5 and in the intended layer thicknesses.

[0112] In regard to coated tools 34-38 of Comparative Example, the lower layer shown in Table 17 and the upper layer shown in Table 18 were formed in the forming condition shown in Table 3, as in the coated tools 34 to 38 of the present invention.

[0113] For purpose of reference, the reference coated tools 39 and 40 shown in Table 19 were produced by depositing the (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) layers of the reference examples on the surfaces of the cutting tool bodies 2A and 2B in the intended layer thicknesses with a standard physical vapor deposition by arc-ion plating.

[0114] The reference coated tools 39 and 40 were produced by depositing the (Al, Ti)N layer on the surfaces of the above-described tool bodies in the intended composition and the intended layer thicknesses with shown in Table 19 in the conditions for the arc-ion plating used for deposition in the reference example as in Example 1.

[0115] The cross sections of each constituent layer of: the coated tools of the present invention 31 to 40; cutting tools 31 to 38 of Comparative Example; and the reference coated tools 39 and 40, were measured by using a scanning electron microscope (magnifying power: 5000). The average layer thicknesses were obtained by averaging layer thicknesses measured at 5 points within the observation viewing field. In any measurement, the obtained average layer thickness was practically the same as the intended layer thicknesses shown in Tables 17 to 19.

[0116] On the coated tools 31 to 40 of the present invention; the coated tools 31 to 38 of Comparative Example; and the reference coated tools 39 and 40, the average Al content ratio x.sub.avg, the average C content ratio y.sub.avg, and the area ratio of the crystal grains having the average crystal grain misorientation of 2 or more in the crystal grains having the cubic structure constituting the (Ti.sub.1-xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1-y) layer were calculated by using the same method as shown in Example 1. Results are shown in Tables 18 and 19.

TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 Hard coating layer (the number at the bottom indicates the intended average layer thickness (m) of the layer) Tool body Lower layer Type symbol 1st layer 2nd layer 3rd layer Coated tool of the present invention, 31 2A coated tool of Comparative Example, 32 2B and reference coated tool 33 2A 34 2B TiC (0.5) 35 2A TiN-3 (0.5) 36 2B TiN-3 (0.1) 37 2A TiN-3 1-TiCN-2 (0.5) (3) 38 2B TiN-3 1-TiCN-2 TiN-3 (0.3) (7) (0.7) 39 2A 40 2B

TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 18 Hard coating layer Ti and Al complex nitride, carbonitride layer (Ti.sub.1xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1y) Formation Area symbol of Area ratio of crystal ratio Upper layer TiAlCN Al C grains having the of the Intended (Numbers at the bottom Tool deposition content content average crystal grain cubic layer indicate the average body process (refer ratio ratio misorientation crystals thickness intended layer thickness Type symbol Tables 4 and 5) x y of 2 or more (%) (%) (m) (m) of the layer) Coated tool 31 2A G 0.87 less than 53 100 6 of the present 0.0001 invention 32 2B J 0.65 less than 61 100 2 0.0001 33 2A C 0.79 0.0022 42 100 5 34 2B G 0.85 less than 48 100 1 0.0001 35 2A J 0.64 less than 60 98 4 TiN-3 0.0001 (0.5) 36 2B C 0.75 0.0031 45 100 3 37 2A G 0.83 less than 49 100 6 0.0001 38 2B J 0.63 less than 56 96 4 0.0001 39 2A C 0.77 0.0047 48 100 8 40 2B J 0.61 less than 59 99 3 0.0001

TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 19 Hard coating layer Ti and Al complex nitride, carbonitride layer (Ti.sub.1xAl.sub.x)(C.sub.yN.sub.1y) Formation Area symbol of Area ratio of crystal ratio Upper layer TiAlCN Al C grains having the of the Intended (Numbers at the bottom Tool deposition content content average crystal grain cubic layer indicate the average body process (refer ratio ratio misorientation crystals thickness intended layer thickness Type symbol Tables 4 and 5) x y of 2 or more (%) (%) (m) (m) of the layer) Coated tool of 31 2A G 0.85 less than 7 100 6 Comparative 0.0001 Example 32 2B J 0.63 less than 10 100 2 0.0001 33 2A C 0.76 0.0022 1 100 5 34 2B G 0.83 less than 4 100 1 0.0001 35 2A J 0.65 less than 12 98 4 TiN-3 0.0001 (0.5) 36 2B C 0.73 0.0031 4 100 3 37 2A G 0.81 less than 4 100 6 0.0001 38 2B J 0.61 less than 7 96 4 0.0001 Reference 39 2A AIP 0.77 less than 2 100 8 coated tool 0.0001 40 2B AIP 0.90 less than 1 100 3 0.0001 AIP indicates deposition by using the arc ion plating.

[0117] Next, each coated tool described above was screwed on the tip of the insert holder made of tool steel by a fixing jig. Then, the dry high speed intermittent cutting test of carbolized steel explained below were performed on the coated tools of the present invention 31-40; the coated tools 31 to 38 of Comparative Example; and the reference coated tools 39 and 40. After the tests, width of flank wear of the cutting edge was measured in each test.

[0118] Tool body: Cubic boron nitride-based ultra-high pressure sintered material

[0119] Cutting test: Dry high-speed intermittent cutting test of carbolized steel

[0120] Work: Round bar in JIS-SCr420 standard (hardness: HRC60) with 4 evenly spaced slits in the longitudinal direction

[0121] Cutting speed: 240 m/min.

[0122] Cutting depth: 0.1 mm

[0123] Feed rate: 0.12 mm/rev.

[0124] Cutting time: 4 minutes

[0125] Results are shown in Table 20.

TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 20 Width of Cutting test flank wear result Type (mm) Type (minute) Coated tool of the 31 0.10 Coated tool of 31 2.2* present invention 32 0.11 Comparative 32 2.2* 33 0.08 Example 33 1.7* 34 0.08 34 1.9* 35 0.07 35 2.2* 36 0.10 36 2.4* 37 0.09 37 1.9* 38 0.11 38 2.3* 39 0.07 Reference coated 39 2.2* 40 0.10 tool 40 1.5* Asterisk marks (*) in the column of coated tools of Comparative Example and reference coated tools indicate cutting time (min) until they reached to their service lives due to occurrence of chipping.

[0126] Based on results shown in Tables 9, 15, and 20, it was demonstrated that the coated tools of the present invention had improved toughness, while high wear resistance is maintained, because there were strains in crystal grains to improve hardness by having a predetermined average crystal grain misorientation in the cubic crystal grains constituting the Al and Ti complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer of the hard coating layer. Furthermore, the coated tools of the present invention had excellent chipping resistance and defect resistance even in the case where they were used in high-speed intermittent cutting work where intermittent and impact load is exerted on the cutting edge. As a result, the coated tools of the present invention exhibit excellent wear resistance for a long-term usage evidently.

[0127] On the contrary, in regard to the coated tools 1-13, 16-28, 31-38 of Comparative Example, and the reference coated tools 14, 15, 29, 30, 39, and 40, which did not have the predetermined average crystal grain misorientation in the cubic crystal grains constituting the Al and Ti complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer of the hard coating layer, it was demonstrated that high heat was generated during cutting; and they reached to the end of service lives in a short time due to chipping, defect, or the like when they were used in high-speed intermittent cutting work where intermittent and impact high load is exerted on the cutting edge, evidently.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

[0128] As described above, the coated tool of the present invention can be used not only in the high speed intermittent cutting work of alloy steel, but can be used as coated tool for various work materials. Moreover, since it exhibits excellent chipping resistance and wear resistance for a long-term usage, it satisfies the demands for adapting to a cutting apparatus with a higher performance; power-saving and energy-saving in cutting work; and cost-saving, sufficiently.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

[0129] P: Measurement point (Pixel) [0130] B: Grain boundary [0131] 1: Cutting tool body [0132] 2: Hard coating layer [0133] 3: Complex nitride or complex carbonitride layer