ABSOLUTE MEASURING LENGTH MEASURING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ITS OPERATION
20170167896 ยท 2017-06-15
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
In a length or position measuring system which has an at least locally substantially linear measuring gauge and at least one sensor able to be moved relative to the measuring gauge wherein the measuring gauge includes an incremental track and at least one absolute track and wherein the incremental track and the at least one absolute track have pole pairs arranged in the longitudinal direction of the measuring gauge, it is provided in particular that at least one pole pair of the absolute track is phase-shifted relative to a corresponding pole pair of the incremental track.
Claims
1. A length or position measuring system, which has an at least locally substantially linear measuring gauge (400, 405) and at least one sensor head (520, 530, 535) that is able to be moved relative to the measuring gauge (400, 405) and comprises at least one increment sensor (520) and at least one absolute sensor (530, 535), wherein the measuring gauge (400, 405) comprises an incremental track (400) and at least one absolute track (405) and wherein the incremental track (400) and the at least one absolute track (405) have pole pairs (410, 415) arranged in the longitudinal direction of the measuring gauge (400, 405), wherein at least one pole pair (415) of the at least one absolute track (405) is arranged or formed phase-shifted relative to a corresponding pole pair (410) of the incremental track (400).
2. The length or position measuring system according to claim 1, wherein the at least one absolute track (405) provides a mixture of poles of different polarity, by means of which at least doubly incremented logical values are generated.
3. The length or position measuring system according to claim 1, wherein n different, absolute phase relations (420-440) of pole pairs (415) of the at least one absolute track (405) are provided by said phase-shifting in relation to corresponding pole pairs (410) of the incremental track (400), whereby, in comparison to pole pairs (410) of the incremental track (400), relative shifts with angles differences (445-465) of between 0 and 360 are formed, by means of which corresponding logical values 1, 2, etc. are formed, wherein each pole pair with a respectively associated sensor forms a digit.
4. The length or position measuring system according to claim 3, wherein m.sup.n values are able to de detected by m logical values and n sensors corresponding to respective angle differences (445-465).
5. The length or position measuring system according to claim 4, wherein n digits are connected to a total value, whereby m.sup.n values are able to be depicted.
6. The length or position measuring system according to claim 1, wherein the transition values of the angle differences (445-465) between two adjacent, different logical values (420-440) are removed from the evaluation of the logical values.
7. The length or position measuring device according to claim 6, wherein at least two absolute sensors (530, 535) are provided for each pole pair (515) of the at least one absolute track (405), which are arranged offset to one another, and an increment sensor (520) is provided that detects the position within a pole pair (510) of the incremental track (500), said pole pair being divided into numerous regions (525).
8. A method for operating a length or position measuring system according to claim 1, wherein m logical values are detected corresponding to respective angle differences (445-465) and m.sup.n values are detected by n sensors.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein n digits are connected to form a total value and thus m.sup.n values are depicted.
10. The method according to claim 8 for operating a length or position measuring system which has an increment sensor (520) and at least two absolute sensors (530, 535) for each pole pair (515) of the at least one absolute track (405), wherein the at least two absolute sensors (530, 535) are arranged offset to one another, wherein the increment sensor (520) detects the position within a pole pair (510) divided into several regions of the incremental track (500), wherein, if the increment sensor (520) is in one of the two other regions (525), the second of the at least two absolute sensors (530, 535) is provided for the evaluation.
11. The method according to claim 8, wherein the courses of the angle differences between two adjacent, different logical values are removed from the evaluation of the logical values.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0027] In
[0028] Along with the conventional application scenarios with a substantially linear measuring section, such a measuring gauge 100, 105 can also be arranged on the circumference of a shaft, e.g. a drive shaft of a wind turbine or similar which is not shown. The BML thus serves to monitor or maintain the wind turbine if the position of the drive shaft has to be precisely detected.
[0029] The angle detected by the incremental sensor changes in each pole or pole pair 205, as is known in itself, from 0 to 360 (reference numeral 215). This is schematically depicted in
[0030] As already mentioned, the coding of an absolute track takes place according to the concept according to the invention by a phase shift of the poles of the absolute track relative to the poles of the incremental track. This is shown by means of an example by four increments in
[0031] It should thus be noted here that in general in the case of implementation with n analogue sensors for reading m-fold analogously quantized steps, x=m.sup.n values or poles can clearly be identified. The number of sensors is thus advantageously reduced compared to an implementation known from prior art with two (binary) logical values, i.e. m=2. In this way, when m=5 values and four sensors for example, 5.sup.4=625 poles can clearly be recognized or when m=2 (according to prior art) with four sensors, 2.sup.4=16 poles can clearly be recognized. In order to be able to clearly recognize 625 poles with prior art, ten sensors would be required since 2.sup.10=1024. Thus, for example, nine sensors would not suffice. For these reasons, a considerable cost advantage and a considerable construction size advantage of the invention emerge, since only four instead of ten sensors are necessary.
[0032] On the right side of
[0033] In the section depicted in
[0034] It should be noted that a logical value is herein defined which coincidentally, in the present example, has the value 01230. Thus any combination of such numbers, e.g. . . . 1032302 . . . is possible. Such a coding is located on the entire measuring gauge and cannot be repeated across the length of the measuring gauge for reasons of clarity, which incidentally corresponds to the principles of said PRC code.
[0035] In the lower part of FIG.4, the angle difference measured in the longitudinal direction of the measuring gauge 400, 405 between the incremental track 400 and the absolute track 405 is indicated. The angle difference changes according to said four increments 445, 450, 455, 460 from the 0 value to the 270 value in order to then start again at the 0 value (corresponding to reference numeral 465).
[0036] It should be noted that with typical relative dimensions of a measuring gauge with a pole width of 20 mm or 10 mm shown in
[0037] Within a pole pair 410 of the incremental track 400, the angle difference between the incremental track 400 and the absolute track 405 is substantially constant. In the region of the conversion of the angle difference from one logical value to a different (adjacent) logical value, e.g. from the logical value 1 425 to the logical value 2 430, the respective underlying logical values can be deduced relatively poorly from the corresponding angle difference signals 450, 455. Therefore two sensors are used for each digit, as can be seen in
[0038] In
[0039] A corresponding approach to a solution is the use, schematically shown in
[0040] The increment sensor 520 additionally marked above the incremental track thus initially detects the position within a pole pair 510. Such a pole pair 510 is divided into several regions, in fact in the present case into four quadrants 525. When the increment sensor 520 is in the first quadrant 1 or in the fourth quadrant 4 of the respective pole pair, the second absolute sensor 535 (A2) has to be used for the evaluation. If, however, the increment sensor 520 is in the second quadrant 2 or in the third quadrant 3, the first absolute sensor 530 (A1) has to be used for the evaluation.
[0041] With this method, the invalid region between the pole pairs can be inexpensively though still effectively blocked out. When determining the phase position, the amplitudes are minimized during the mathematical calculation. The angle is determined by the ratio formation and by means of the arctan function.
[0042] It should be noted that the described measuring system can also be correspondingly used in numerous absolute tracks, whereby the housing length is advantageously even more greatly reduced accordingly.
[0043] The described measuring gauge or the described length measuring system and the described method for operating it, can preferably be used in a magnetic tape length measuring system with the advantages described herein. Furthermore, the device and the method however can be principally used in all rotary and linear positioning, measuring, movement speed or rotational speed monitoring. In addition, the method can not only be used with the magnetic tape length measuring system described herein or the magnetic measuring systems with said advantages, but also in all kinds of absolute measuring systems which are based on an incremental active principle, e.g. inductive, optical or capacitive measuring systems or the like. With the last mentioned. In the non-magnetic measuring systems mentioned last, the concepts and principals described herein are able to be used analogously.