METHOD FOR THE MICRO-STRUCTURED APPLICATION OF A FLUID OR PASTE ONTO A SURFACE
20170165711 ยท 2017-06-15
Inventors
Cpc classification
H05K2203/1173
ELECTRICITY
G03F1/00
PHYSICS
H05K3/1208
ELECTRICITY
International classification
B05D1/32
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A method for the micro-structured application of a fluid or paste onto a surface, including providing a substrate having a surface, coating the surface with a non-stick layer, at least partially removing the non-stick layer and producing a coating area, and applying at least one fluid droplet or paste droplet onto the surface in the coating area.
Claims
1. A method for the micro-structured application of a fluid or paste onto a surface, comprising: (A) providing a substrate having a surface; (B) coating the surface with a non-stick layer; (C) at least partially removing the non-stick layer and producing a coating area; (D) applying at least one fluid droplet or paste droplet onto the surface in the coating area.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the removal of the non-stick layer is carried out in step (C) with the aid of laser radiation.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein following step (D), a solvent is expelled from the paste droplet or the ink droplet in a step (E).
4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein the non-stick layer is removed after step (E) in a step (F).
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS
[0021] The present invention now describes a possibility of using an applied and structured non-stick layer to produce dot sizes that are smaller than those that could normally be produced by the methods mentioned in the related art, since the applied droplet volume is able to wet only the opened area within the non-stick layer, and spreading is thereby effectively prevented.
[0022]
[0023]
[0024] In micromechanical gas sensors, the gas conversion usually takes place with the aid of paste dots on interdigital structures, which are able to be heated in a defined manner and evaluated resistively. The detection of certain gases or also gas mixtures, or the sensitivity of the gases to be detected with the aid of the paste dot, is dependent upon the temperature of the paste dot, among others things. In order to keep the power consumption of the gas sensors to a minimum, diaphragms featuring excellent thermal insulation are therefore employed, where the paste dot is situated on an interdigital structure that is disposed above a heater in an electrically insulated manner. Undefined spreading of a paste dot thus leads to undefined heat conduction of the diaphragm, so that the power consumption rises and a greater temperature gradient may be produced. The latter in turn causes a decrease in the precision of the gas measurement because gases or gas mixtures that lead to a signal rise at different temperatures, are now increasingly detected in parallel.
[0025] In the case of multi-dot sensors, spreading of paste droplets or ink droplets may cause different adjacently applied paste/ink droplets to run into one another and to thereby negatively influence the gas sensitivities of one another. In this case, the individual paste points would then have to be placed at a greater distance from one another, which would mean larger diaphragms and larger chips.
[0026] In order to avoid the afore-described effects, a non-stick layer 200, which is able to prevent spreading of paste droplet or ink droplet 300, is now employed according to the present invention.
[0027] To then produce coating areas locally where paste/ink droplets may adhere to surface 100, non-stick layer 200 is locally removed with the aid of laser radiation. Using well-focused lasers makes it certainly possible to realize exposure areas of 20 m in diameter. The removal of non-stick layer 200 creates a coating area 250.
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032] When selecting non-stick layer 200, it should be ensured that it is compatible with solvent 400 of paste/ink droplet 300. In other words, the solvent must want to form a wetting angle on the non-stick layer that is as large as possible. Since spreading 330 of a paste/ink droplet on a surface is able to be laterally restricted with the aid of the non-stick layer, there is now also the possibility of influencing the height of the resulting paste dot in that the ratio between solvent and gas-sensitive material in a paste/ink droplet can be selected more freely. A large solvent component leads to flat paste dots, and a low solvent component leads to higher paste dots. At a given diameter, it is thereby possible to utilize a further, influenceable parameter for producing a specific gas sensitivity, that is to say, the height or the volume of a paste dot.
[0033]
[0034]
[0039] The non-stick layer is deposited in step (B) from the gas phase. The layer thickness lies in the range of a few monolayers. It is self-limiting.
[0040] In addition, it is possible to expel a solvent 400 from the paste droplet or ink droplet 300 in a step E which follows step D. Solvent 400 should be expelled at a temperature that lies below a limit temperature, above which non-stick layer 200 would be destroyed. The solvent is usually expelled into the air. However, as an alternative, the expelling of the solvent in another atmosphere such as O2, N2, inertial gas, forming gas or other gases or gas mixtures, for instance, is also possible.
[0041] In addition, it is possible to remove non-stick layer 200 in a step F which follows step E.
[0042] In an alternative development of the method of the present invention, a photoresist mask, rather than a non-stick layer, is employed in step (B). The photoresist is applied by spin-coating and thus deposited in a considerably thicker layer than the non-stick layer applied in the aforementioned deposition method. In step (F), the photoresist can therefore be removed without residue only by a plasma ashing step. However, this produces gas radicals that may react with the paste dot and have a negative effect on the gas sensor function.
[0043] As an alternative, the photoresist is able to be removed at a higher temperature in O2 or in situ during sintering, as may be the case with the non-stick layer. However, the resist would combust in the process and leave carbon-containing residue on the surface which may adversely affect the sensor function. A wet-chemical removal of the photoresist is also possible, but the generally known solvents affect the gas-sensor function in an adverse manner too.
[0044] To this extent, a resist mask may be an alternative to non-stick layer 200 but not in those instances where the restriction of coating area 250 of gas-sensitive paste dots, in particular for gas sensors, is involved.
LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS
[0045] 10 substrate
[0046] 50 structured layer
[0047] 50 interdigital structure
[0048] 100 substrate surface
[0049] 200 non-stick layer
[0050] 250 coating area
[0051] 300 fluid droplet/paste droplet
[0052] 310 paste dot
[0053] 330 spreading
[0054] 400 solvent