Magnetoresistive magnetic field gradient sensor
09678178 ยท 2017-06-13
Assignee
Inventors
- Jianmin Bai (Zhangjiagang, CN)
- James Geza Deak (Zhangjiagang, CN)
- Mingfeng Liu (Zhangjiagang, CN)
- Weifeng SHEN (Zhangjiagang, CN)
Cpc classification
G01R33/098
PHYSICS
G01R33/093
PHYSICS
International classification
G01B7/14
PHYSICS
G01R17/00
PHYSICS
Abstract
Disclosed is a magnetoresistive magnetic field gradient sensor, comprising a substrate, a magnetoresistive bridge and a permanent magnet respectively disposed on the substrate; the magnetoresistive bridge comprises two or more magnetoresistive arms; each magnetoresistive arm consists of one or more magnetoresistive elements; each magnetoresistive element is provided with a magnetic pinning layer; the magnetic pinning layers of all the magnetoresistive elements have the same magnetic moment direction; the permanent magnet is disposed adjacent to each magnetoresistive arm to provide a bias field, and to zero the offset of the response curve of the magnetoresistive element; the magnetoresistive gradiometer includes wire bonding pads that can be electrically interconnected using wire bonding to an ASIC or to the lead frame of a semiconductor chip package.
Claims
1. A magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor, comprising a multiplicity of magnetoresistive arms connected to form a magnetoresistive bridge, wherein each of the multiplicity of the magnetoresistive arms includes one or more magnetoresistive elements, wherein the magnetoresistive elements for all of the magnetoresistive arms that form the magnetoresistive bridge have substantially equal transfer curves to provide substantially equal sensitivities to an applied magnetic field, wherein each of the magnetoresistive elements within the magnetoresistive bridge has a magnetic pinning layer with a magnetic moment aligned in the same direction, permanent magnets operatively positioned with respect to the magnetoresistive arms to generate a bias magnetic field to zero an offset of the transfer curve of each of the magnetoresistive elements, a semiconductor substrate on which the magnetoresistive bridge and the permanent magnets are deposited, a wire bond pad used to electrically interconnect the magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor to an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chip or to a terminal of a package lead frame by bond wires.
2. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 1, wherein the magnetoresistive elements are magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) elements.
3. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 2, wherein the magnetoresistive elements have shape anisotropy.
4. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 3, wherein the magnetoresistive elements are prepared using the same process on the same semiconductor substrate and have the same shape and the same resistance value.
5. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 1, wherein the magnetoresistive bridge is a half-bridge.
6. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 1, wherein the magnetoresistive bridge is a full-bridge, the magnetoresistive arms have the same sensing direction, and the magnetoresistive arms are distributed between two separated spatial locations on the semiconductor substrate, such that the magnetoresistive arms, connected in series, are not in the same spatial location on the semiconductor substrate as the magnetoresistive arms to which they are electrically connected, such that the magnetoresistive bridge detects the gradient of the applied magnetic field.
7. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 1, wherein a magnitude of a magnetization of the permanent magnets is adjusted in order to control an output performance of the magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer.
8. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 1, wherein the magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer is a single chip magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer.
9. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 1, wherein an angle of a magnetization of the permanent magnets is adjusted in order to control an output performance of the magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer.
10. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 1, wherein an angle of the permanent magnets is adjusted in order to control an output performance of the magneto resistive magnetic field gradiometer.
11. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 1, wherein an angle of a magnetization of the permanent magnets is adjusted in order to control an output performance of the magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer.
12. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 1, wherein an angle of the permanent magnets is adjusted in order to control an output performance of the magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer.
13. A magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor to detect a gradient in an applied magnetic field, the sensor comprising: a magnetoresistive bridge formed by connected magnetoresistive arms; each of the magnetoresistive arms including at least one magnetoresistive element; all of the magnetoresistive elements within the magnetoresistive bridge having a magnetic pinning layer with a magnetic moment aligned in the same direction, and having substantially equal transfer curves to provide substantially equal sensitivities to the applied magnetic field such that, when the gradient in the applied electric field causes different ones of the magnetoresistive elements to experience different magnetic fields, the different ones of the magnetoresistive elements have different resistance values; permanent magnets operatively positioned to generate a bias magnetic field to zero an offset of the transfer curve of each of the magnetoresistive elements; a substrate on which the magnetoresistive bridge and the permanent magnets are deposited; and a wire bond pad on the substrate.
14. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 13, wherein the magnetoresistive elements include magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJ) elements.
15. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 13, wherein the bridge includes a full-bridge.
16. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 13, wherein the bridge includes a half-bridge.
17. The magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer sensor of claim 13, wherein the magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer is a single chip magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometer.
Description
FIGURES
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(12)
(13) The bottom electrode layer 9 and the top electrode layer 6 are in direct electrical contact respectively with the free layer 5 and antiferromagnetic layer 2. The electrode layers are generally composed of non-magnetic conductive materials capable of carrying current to the ohmmeter 34. Ohm meter 34 applies a known current (voltage) through the entire tunnel junction, and a voltage (or current) is measured. Typically, the tunnel barrier layer 4 provides most of the resistance of the device, on the order of about 1000 ohms and the resistance of all other conductors is about 10 ohms. The bottom electrode layer 9 is deposited on top of the insulating layer 10, which is in turn deposited on substrate 11, and insulating layer 10 is thicker than electrode layer 9, and they are composed of different materials. The substrate material is typically silicon, quartz, heat-resistant glass, GaAs, AlTiC or any other material capable of being provided as a smooth wafer. Because of the ease of processing integrated circuits (although such magnetic sensors may not always need circuitry) silicon is usually the best choice.
(14)
(15) As shown in
(16)
(17) Herein, H.sub.S is the saturation field. H.sub.S is defined as the intersection between the linear region and the positive and negative saturation values, where the position is asymmetric due to H.sub.0.
(18)
(19) As shown in
(20) A bridge circuit is often used to change the output resistance to a voltage than can be easily amplified. It can reduce the sensor noise, improve common mode rejection, reduce temperature drift and improve other deficiencies. The above mentioned MTJ arm 20 can be made into a bridge circuit.
(21) As shown in
(22) The magnetic field emanating from the edge 35 of the permanent magnets 22 is considered to arise from magnetic charges that form as a result of boundary conditions as shown schematically in
.sub.s=M.sub.r sin(.sub.sns.sub.mag(2)
(23) Additionally, the magnetic field resulting from the distribution of magnetic charges can be defined as:
(24)
(25) When .sub.mag=.sub.ref=/2, the magnetic field at MTJ element 1 only depends on remanent moment M.sub.R as described by the following equation:
(26)
(27) Equation 4 is a function of the width W 39 and gap G 38 shown in
(28) Along the direction perpendicular to the sensitive direction 23 of the MTJ element, permanent magnets 22 produce a bias field for the magnetoresistive element
H.sub.off=H.sub.mag cos(.sub.sns)(5)
(29) Parallel to the sensitive direction 23 of the MTJ element, the magnetic field of the permanent magnet 22 is
H.sub.off=H.sub.mag sin(.sub.sms)(6)
(30) As can be seen from above, by adjusting the thickness of the permanent magnet, the angles of the permanent magnet .sub.mag 37 and .sub.sns 44, it is possible to change H.sub.off, in order to compensate the MTJ element against the Neel coupling field H.sub.0, thereby modifying the output characteristics and improving performance. On the other hand, it is also possible to adjust H.sub.cross, to change the saturation field of the MTJ element, thereby adjusting the sensitivity.
(31) By setting the permanent magnets 22 at an angle .sub.sns 44 with respect to the sensing axis 23, it is possible to simultaneously produce H.sub.cross 27 and H.sub.off 26 fields, in order to set the MTJ element saturation field, at the same time cancel the Neel coupling, to center the response curve of the MTJ element around zero field; this method will optimize the symmetry of the output response of the bridge, reduce effective Neel coupling and set desired sensitivity. In addition, setting the remanent magnetization M.sub.r at angle .sub.mag 37 with respect to the sensing axis 23 after preparation of the gradiometer chip, permits fine tuning of the device to optimize symmetry, allowing further improvement in manufacturing yield.
(32) MTJ element 1 is generally patterned into a shape in order to provide shape anisotropy H.sub.k. The common shapes are long ellipse, long rectangle, rhomboid, etc. With regard to this, the MTJ element 1 will have a saturation field H.sub.S given by:
H.sub.S=H.sub.k+H.sub.cross,(7)
(33) A single MTJ element magnetoresistive response curve 1 as herein described has a sensitivity of:
(34)
(35) By changing the shape of the permanent magnets and the MTJ elements the response curve of the MTJ element can be modified.
(36)
(37)
(38) The fields H.sub.CM and H.sub.dM are the common mode and differential mode output field values.
(39) Ideally, R1=R2, S.sub.R1=S.sub.R2, MTJ elements R1 and R2 are consistently the same, biased with half-bridge bias voltage V.sub.bias, then for a common mode magnetic field H.sub.CM, the half-bridge output voltage is V.sub.OUT30:
(40)
(41) Setting V.sub.bias==1V results in a common mode sensitivity of S.sub.CM=dV.sub.1/dH.sub.CM=0
(42) The output does not change with H.sub.CM, it is only sensitive to the external magnetic field gradient, and this makes it insensitive to external magnetic field interference.
(43) For the differential mode H.sub.dM, we can write:
(44)
(45) Ideally, S.sub.R1=S.sub.R2, R1=R2 such that:
(46)
(47) So it can be observed that the gradiometer output change in response to a differential mode field H.sub.dM changes, when biased V.sub.bias=1V, the sensitivity is
(48)
(49) As can be seen from the above equation, the half-bridge gradiometer in differential mode only responds to a gradient magnetic field, and outputs a signal proportional to it, but also has good magnetic field anti-interference capability. The measurement results of a typical half-bridge gradiometer are shown in
(50) Small differences in R1 and R2, make small differences in sensitivities S.sub.R1 and S.sub.R2, and this causes a response to a common mode magnetic field H.sub.CM. Still, the common mode sensitivity is much smaller than the differential mode sensitivity, and the sensitivity to the undesired common mode response can be quantified as a common mode rejection ratio CMRR:
(51)
(52) With good process capability, CMRR is better than 40 dB.
(53)
(54) Ideally, the output V.sub.OUT only responds to the differential mode magnetic field H.sub.dM. For the differential mode, the response can be written:
(55)
(56) Under ideal conditions, R1=R2=R3=R4, S.sub.R1=S.sub.R2=S.sub.R3=S.sub.R4=S.sub.R, such that:
(57)
(58) Wherein, R is the resistance value of the MTJ elements 20, and S.sub.R is the sensitivity of the magnetoresistive elements. It can be shown that the full and half bridge magnetic field gradiometers have the same insensitivity to common mode magnetic fields, but the full-bride has twice the sensitivity of the half-bridge magnetic field gradiometer. The typical output response of a full-bridge magnetic field gradiometer is shown in
(59) The above mentioned half and full-bridge gradiometers can be prepared on single substrate using the same process steps. For this reason they can be called single-chip magnetoresistive magnetic field gradiometers. They are compatible with various different packaging techniques and can also be made multi-chip. For example, the magnetoresistive elements can be prepared on the same substrate using the same process steps, but then diced into separate chips that are electrically connected, resulting in full or half-bridge gradiometer devices. Whether single or multi-chip packaging is used, the external bond pads of the bridges may or may not be connected to an ASIC both of which would be placed on a lead frame, electrically connected to the output pins of the lead frame, and then encapsulated to form the packaged device.
(60) The above description describes several different specific implementations of the invention, obviously, many more variations can be implemented without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Those skilled in the art can make many variations without departing from the intent or technical scope of the invention.