Biologic composition and method of manufacture

Abstract

A biological composition has a mixture of mechanically selected allogeneic biologic material derived from bone marrow. The mixture has non-whole cellular components including vesicular components and active and inactive components of biological activity, cell fragments, cellular excretions, cellular derivatives, and extracellular components. The mixture is compatible with biologic function.

Claims

1. A biological composition suitable for implantation or grafting to a human patient comprising: a mixture of mechanically selected biologic material derived from bone marrow from cut vertebral bodies including cortical and cancellous bone having non-whole cellular components including each of vesicular components and active and inactive components of biological activity, cell fragments, cellular excretions, and extracellular components wherein the mixture is cleaned and packed for processing in a cold media of DMEM without L-glutamine or HEPES; a protectant or cryoprotectant of polyampholyte added to the mixture; and wherein the mixture is intermixed with the protectant or cryoprotectant of polyampholyte to form a coating on the non-whole cellular components of the mixture prior to preservation or cryopreservation and is subsequently frozen, the frozen mixture with the protectant or cryoprotectant of polyampholyte being preserved frozen, the frozen mixture and the protectant or cryoprotectant of polyampholyte when thawed is prepared for implantation is configured to thaw into a liquid for direct implantation in the absence of washing the protectant or cryoprotectant from the mixture which is compatible with biologic function.

2. The biological composition of claim 1 further comprises bone particles, the bone particles being added to the mixture derived from bone marrow.

3. The biological composition of claim 2 wherein the bone particles include a mixture of cortical bone particles and cancellous bone particles.

4. The biological composition of claim 2 wherein the biological composition is predisposed to demonstrate or support elaboration of active volume or spatial geometry consistent in morphology with that of endogenous bone.

5. The biological composition of claim 1 wherein the mixture of mechanically selected material derived from bone marrow further includes non-expanded whole cells.

6. The biological composition of claim 5 wherein the bone marrow mixture which is derived from a cadaver has separation-enhanced cell vitality including one or more of the following: separating the cells heightens their vitality, reversing arrest of donors, responsive molecular coupling, matrix quest in neutralizing inflammation or satience by balancing stimulus for repair.

7. The biological composition of claim 5 wherein the combination of non-whole cell components with a select number of the non-expanded cells sustains pluripotency in the cells.

8. The biological composition of claim 7 wherein the select number of the non-expanded cells includes differentiated committed cells and non-differentiated and non-committed cells.

9. The biological composition of claim 1 wherein the biological composition extends regenerative resonance that compliments or mimics tissue complexity.

10. The biological composition of claim 9 wherein the regenerative resonance occurs in the presence or absence of a refractory response.

11. The biological composition of claim 1 wherein the protectant or cryoprotectant creates a physical or electrical or chemical gradient or combination thereof for tissue regeneration.

12. The biological composition of claim 11 wherein the gradient has a physical characteristic of modulus or topography.

13. The biological composition of claim 11 wherein the gradient has a chemical characteristic of spatially changing compositions of density or species of functional molecules.

14. The biological composition of claim 11 wherein the gradient has an electrical characteristic of charge based or pH based or electron affinities that confer metastability in biologic potential.

15. The biological composition of claim 1 wherein the cryopreservation occurs at a temperature that is sub-freezing.

16. The biological composition of claim 15 wherein the cryopreservation temperature is from 0 degrees C. to 200 degrees C.

17. The biological composition of claim 1 wherein the mixture creates a physical or electrical or chemical gradient or combination thereof for tissue regeneration.

18. The biological composition of claim 17 wherein the gradient has a physical characteristic such as modulus or topography.

19. The biological composition of claim 17 wherein the gradient has a chemical characteristic such as spatially changing compositions of density or species of functional molecules.

20. The biological composition of claim 17 wherein the gradient has an electrical characteristic such as charge based or pH based.

21. The biological composition of claim 1 includes organelle fragments.

22. The biological composition of claim 1 wherein active and inactive components of biological activity includes extants of the human metabolome.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The invention will be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

(2) FIG. 1 shows a photograph of a cut vertebral body taken from a spine of a cadaver donor.

(3) FIG. 2 shows a photograph of the vertebral body after being cut into cubic pieces and immersed in a packing media.

(4) FIG. 3 shows a photograph of the bulk bone material after being ground and immersed in packing media and placed in a jar for later tumbling.

(5) FIG. 4 shows a photograph of the jar with a CBT-Mixer connected to a tumbler.

(6) FIG. 5 is a photograph of an exemplary sieve device having sieves sized to separate the solid material.

(7) FIG. 6 shows a photograph of two 50 ml vials, the one on the left being prior to centrifuging with the Ficoll that is commercially available at the bottom and the material above it. The 50 ml vial on the right is after centrifuging showing the cell interface layer.

(8) FIG. 7 is a photograph showing the four tumbling steps 1-4 by exemplary collection and Ficoll separation of the decanted fluids, the fluid in tumble 1 being completely discarded to remove unwanted debris.

(9) FIG. 8A is a chart showing the percent recovery at 6 months after cryofreezing the mixture of 1 ml at 1.110.sup.6 cells and thawing.

(10) FIG. 8B is a chart showing the viability at 6 months after cryofreezing and thawing.

(11) FIG. 8C shows a chart at 6 months of MSC markers by percentage of cells.

(12) FIGS. 9A and 9B are photographs of cells thawed from a single sample and placed in media at 37 degrees C. overnight evidencing cell viability.

(13) FIG. 10 is a representative photograph of the final packaging.

(14) FIG. 11 is a photograph showing the ground bone.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(15) With reference to the present invention which is a tissue regenerative biological composition 100 made from bone marrow 200, it is believed best understood by the methods used to process and recover the biological composition, as illustrated in the FIGS. 1-6.

(16) The first steps are to collect, recover and process bone marrow 200 from a cadaver donor. To do this, the spine is removed aseptically from the cadaver and the resultant spine segment is covered by cold media. The cold media has 0.5 ml of Heparin; 10,000 units/ml per 500 ml of DMEM. DMEM is a sterile solution with low glucose (lg/L), Sodium Pyruvate; without L-glutamine, or HEPES. This cold media is used for packaging the spine segments for later processing. At this point the spine segment includes a plurality of vertebral bodies 202. The clinical technician must remove as much soft tissue as possible and cut each vertebral body 202 with a saw. These vertebral bodies 202, once cleaned, of all adherent soft tissue around the cortical surfaces will look as shown in FIG. 1.

(17) Once a cleaned vertebral body 202 is obtained, the next step involves cutting each vertebral body 202 into pieces, each piece 204 roughly 1 cm.sup.3. The cut pieces 204 being immersed in a packing media 400. The exemplary packing media can be DMEM with 0.5 mlHeparin and 1.25 ml of DNAse added.

(18) Once all the vertebral bodies 202 have been cut, the pieces 204 are taken to the bone grinder. The bone is ground into 4-10 mm pieces using packing media 400 to help the pieces go through the grinder. The ground bone 206 (bulk cortical-cancellous crushed) and all of the packing media 400, estimated volume of 500 ml are transferred into a jar 300 where 0.5-1.0 ml of Gentamicin is added to the jar 300 with ground bone 206 and packing media 400. At this point, the crushed bone 206, including cellular soft marrow 200, is intermixed.

(19) The step of mechanically separating these cellular components of bone marrow 200 from the cadaverous bone is next performed. Transferring the bulk cortical-cancellous bone chips into a new jar with a CBT-Mixer in the jar. The bulk cortical-cancellous bone chips 206 will go through four cycles as summarized in the table below. Each cycle, after cycle 1, contains three steps using a bone tumbler 500 and sieve set 600. The sieve set 600 has screens 602 of various sizes, for example 500 m and 180 m, as shown in FIG. 5.

(20) TABLE-US-00001 Step Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 4 Bone 30 minutes. 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes Tum- Using 500 mL Using 500 mL Using 500 mL Using bler Processing Processing Processing 400 mL Media Media Media Processing Media Sieve Use the 500- Use the 500- Use the 500- Use the 500- Set m and the m, 180-m m, 180-m m, 180-m bottom pan and bottom and bottom and bottom sieve. Discard pan sieve. pan sieve. pan sieve. decanted fluid. Collect Collect Collect decanted decanted decanted fluid. fluid. fluid. Cen- N/A Use decanted Use decanted Use trifuge fluid. fluid. decanted fluid.

(21) In cycle 1, the decanted fluid 210 is discarded. To best understand this, an exemplary FIG. 7 shows conical tubes with the decanted fluids after each cycle followed by Ficoll separation. Tumble 1 or Cycle 1 has most of the unwanted cells and debris as evidenced by its dark and red appearance whereas each subsequent cycle 2, 3 and 4 are progressively cleared. This FIG. 7 is only to illustrate the effects of multiple tumbles 1-4 and the value in discarding the decanted liquid 210 after the first tumble 1.

(22) After each subsequent sieving of the bulk bone material 206, the decanted fluid 212, 214, 216 containing the mixture with whole cells is collected and put into a collection jar. When the next three cycles are complete and the decanted fluid is all placed in the collection jar comingling the fluids 212, 214 and 216 to form a decanted fluid 220. Then the centrifugation of the combined decanted fluid 220 occurs by placing the fluid 220 in a number of 250 ml conical tubes using a 100 ml pipette. The centrifuge is programmed to 280 g for 10 minutes at room temperature, preferably about 20 degrees C. The fluid 220 is passed through a blood filter to further remove any bone or spicules or clumps from the suspended cells. This completes the step of centrifuging and filtering. At this point, the mixture including whole cells 240 has been separated from the soft marrow tissue 200 and the remaining cancellous and cortical bone is discarded.

(23) After this as shown in FIG. 6, the step of separating the cells 240 by a density centrifugation occurs. The mixture including whole cells 240 is placed in 50 ml conical tubes 20 with Ficoll 800 and undergoes a Ficoll-Paque separation under centrifugation wherein a cell density gradient is established by spinning at 400g for 30 minutes at room temperature, preferably about 20 degrees C. The mixture includes cellular or non-cellular components or a combination thereof. All fluid 211 above the interface is removed and the interface 230 including the desired components which can include whole cells 250 is then collected using a 5 ml pipette and transferred into new 50 ml conical tubes ensuring no tube has more than 10 ml. Then the volume is brought to 50 ml by adding DPBS and centrifuged at 400g for 5 minutes at room temperature, preferably about 20 degrees C. and the supernatant is removed leaving a pellet. Each 50 ml tube is then filled up to 50 ml with DPBS to resuspend the pellet. Another centrifugation occurs and the supernatant is removed and the remaining pellet is resuspended using the process media with no antibiotics. The suspension is then used to resuspend all the pellets in remaining tubes. The suspension volume is brought to 50 ml by adding processing media with no antibiotic. Then the suspension can be strained using a 100 m cell strainer if any visual clumping is seen. These steps effectively wash the cells 250, if present, and the non-cellular components. A representative sample is then counted. The remaining, or a portion thereof, of the cellular or non-cellular components or a combination thereof is centrifuged and resuspended in the desired protectant after which it's placed in vials holding 1 ml.

(24) In the preferred embodiment, this results in 1.110.sup.6 cells per ml, but could cover any concentration from zero to less than 5.010.sup.6 cells per ml depending on the desired concentration wanted per cc.

(25) Once the cell count is established and each 1 ml suspension is established or quantified, the material is taken and suspended in a predetermined concentration of a polyampholyte cryoprotectant or any other suitable alternative protectant. When using the cryoprotectant, a freezing of the mixture at a predetermined control rate is required. Ideally, the application of a cryoprotectant coats each cell 250 and provides a protective coating to keep the cell viable during the freezing process. While the techniques for cryopreservation are well known, the present invention after being frozen has demonstrated remarkably unexpected results.

(26) When thawed and a cell count is preformed after manufacture, the cell viability is 80 percent. Thawing is in a water bath warmed to 37 degrees C. for 2-3 minutes. After storage for 6 months, the cell viability is 91.0 +/3.8%. The percent recovery from freeze at 6 months thaw is 82.8 +/7.2%. The inventors have noted that the recovery count is lower than the viability to the lysis of undesirable GlycoA+ cells during freeze, a well-known occurrence. The unlysed desirable cells were viable at 91.0%. The inventors would also like to note that while thawed cells are generally suspended in FDS-supplemented media and spun, to better simulate how the product is actually used the cell recovery at six months was thawed and suspended in 3 ml of saline yielding a 4 ml suspension and that was not spun, but measured directly to simulate a real use injection. This allowed the cryopreservative to more effectively demonstrate that actual count of viable cells a patient would expect to receive and provides one explanation for this remarkable viability result. As shown in FIGS. 9A and 9B, the cells 250 are shown under magnification. In the cells at 6 months thaw the percent of positive cells for MSC markers, specifically CD105 and STR01+ are 52 percent and 74 percent respectively. These indicate the majority of cells are non-differentiated and directionally favorable for new bone formation.

(27) Once the mixture is completed, the method can include additional steps. This leads to the use of a bone blend 102 shown in FIG. 10, preferably from the same vertebral bone or at least bone from the same donor.

(28) When the mixture is prepared, it can have whole cells or even no whole cells, but will have the mechanically selected non-whole cellular components including vesicular components and active and inactive components of biological activity, cell fragments, cellular excretions, cellular derivatives, and extracellular components.

(29) In one embodiment, the composition includes the whole cells in the mixture. In that embodiment, it is possible to provide bone particles with the mixture either in the mixture or separately to be combined at the time of use.

(30) In one embodiment, the bone is ground to a particle size of 100-300 m, see FIG. 11. The bone mixture has 1.5 cc of mineralized cancellous bone 104, 1.5 cc of mineralized cortical bone 105 and 2.0 cc of demineralized cortical bone 106 yielding 30 percent, 30 percent and 40 percent respectively of the total 5 cc (5 gram) of bone material 102. The ranges coincide with the 1 cc of mixture when resuspended in 3 cc of saline to provide a bone particle and mixture for implantation, which can be by packing, injection, scaffolding or any other suitable means, into a patient in a fracture healing procedure, by way of example.

(31) Other ranges of bone particle sized and mixture can be employed depending on the application which, in this example, was bone regeneration. Lower volumes and cell counts may be more suited for less intrusive bone repairs or more if larger if larger amounts of material are needed as in a hip defect or repair.

(32) Variations in the present invention are possible in light of the description of it provided herein. While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for the purpose of illustrating the subject invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in this art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the subject invention. It is, therefore, to be understood that changes can be made in the particular embodiments described, which will be within the full intended scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.