ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE
20250065853 ยท 2025-02-27
Inventors
- Paul PETTY (Portland, OR, US)
- Lowell BROWN (Portland, OR, US)
- Quyen DUCHESNEAU (Portland, OR, US)
- Derek ROTZ (Portland, OR, US)
- Cristin PAUN (Portland, OR, US)
Cpc classification
B60T8/171
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T7/22
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W50/14
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W30/0956
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W2554/4045
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T2201/024
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W30/0953
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60Q5/006
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W30/18154
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T8/172
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W2554/4049
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T8/58
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W2300/14
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W30/09
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T2201/022
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T2220/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T8/17558
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T2250/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60T8/58
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60Q9/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T8/171
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T8/172
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60Q5/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The invention relates to an assistance system (16) configured to be installed in an ego vehicle (10) and support a driver of the ego vehicle (10) in avoiding a collision of the ego vehicle (10) with another vehicle (18), the assistance system (16) being configured to monitor an environment (40) of the ego vehicle (10) and detect the other vehicle (18) approaching the ego vehicle (10). The assistance system (16) is configured to determine that the driver of the ego vehicle (10) is about to perform a turning maneuver (32) of the ego vehicle (10) towards a driver's side (26) of the ego vehicle (10). The assistance system (16) is configured to determine the risk of a collision resulting from the turning maneuver (32), between the ego vehicle (10) and the other vehicle (18).
Claims
1-5. (canceled)
6. A method, comprising: determining a driver of a first vehicle is about to perform, or is in the process of, a turn maneuver into an oncoming lane, in which the first vehicle and a second vehicle are traveling in substantially opposite longitudinal directions; determining a zone in which a collision between the first vehicle and the second vehicle in the oncoming lane is predicted to occur as a result of the turn maneuver; predicting a deceleration rate necessary for a second vehicle to stop before entering the zone; calculating a risk level of collision between the first vehicle and the second vehicle based on the predicted deceleration rate; and controlling at least one vehicle operating parameter based on the risk level.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein determining the driver is about to perform, or is in the process of, the turn maneuver includes determining one or more of a yaw rate of the first vehicle, and a steering angle of the first vehicle.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein determining the driver is about to perform, or is in the process of, the turn maneuver includes determining that the yaw rate and/or the steering angle of the first vehicle is greater than respective threshold yaw rate and/or steering angle values.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein the zone is based on one or more of a determined trajectory of the first vehicle and a speed of the first vehicle.
10. The method of claim 6, wherein determining the driver of the first vehicle is about to perform, or is in the process of, a turn maneuver includes determining a status of a vehicle turn indicator associated with the first vehicle.
11. The method of claim 6, further comprising: issuing an optical warning to the driver responsive to the risk level being calculated to be above a first threshold and below a second threshold.
12. The method of claim 6, wherein the risk level corresponds to a certain probability.
13. The method of claim 6, further comprising: issuing an optical warning and an acoustic warning to the driver responsive to the risk level being calculated to be above a second threshold.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the optical warning corresponding to the risk level being calculated to be above the second threshold is of a greater intensity than another optical warning corresponding to the risk level being calculated to be lower than the second threshold.
15. The method of claim 13, further comprising: responsive to the risk level being calculated to be above the second threshold, initiating automatic braking of the first vehicle.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein initiating automatic braking of the first vehicle occurs subsequent to issuance of the optical warning and the acoustic warning to the driver responsive to the risk level being calculated to be above the second threshold.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein initiating automatic braking of the first vehicle occurs at substantially the same time as issuance of the optical warning and the acoustic warning to the driver responsive to the risk level being calculated to be above the second threshold.
18. The method of claim 15, wherein automatic braking of the first vehicle results in fully stopping the first vehicle.
19. The method of claim 15, wherein automatic braking capabilities are enabled by one or more calibration parameters.
20. The method of claim 15, further comprising initiating a brake-hold where a brake of the first vehicle is automatically held as part of the automatic braking of the first vehicle.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein one or more conditions need be met in order for the first vehicle to release the brake from the brake-hold and to give control back to the driver of the first vehicle.
22. The method of claim 6, wherein calculating the risk level relies on a risk model capable to assign a level of risk to each oncoming vehicle when conditions are met for calculating the risk level.
23. An assistance system for a first vehicle comprising: one or more technologies configured to monitor an environment of the first vehicle; and wherein the assistance system is configured to carry out the methodology of claim 1.
24. The assistance system of claim 23, wherein the one or more technologies are selected from the group consisting of a front radar, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, vehicle-to-infrastructure communication, a camera, and a LIDAR senor.
25. A vehicle comprising the assistance system of claim 24.
26. The vehicle of claim 25, where the vehicle is a commercial vehicle.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] The novel features and characteristic of the disclosure are set forth in the appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this disclosure, illustrate exemplary embodiments and together with the description, serve to explain the disclosed principles. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The same numbers are used throughout the figures to reference like features and components. Some embodiments of system and/or methods in accordance with embodiments of the present subject matter are now described below, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying figures.
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017] In the figures the same elements or elements having the same function are indicated by the same reference signs.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0018] In the present document, the word exemplary is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any embodiment or implementation of the present subject matter described herein as exemplary is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments.
[0019] While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawing and will be described in detail below. It should be understood, however, that it is not intended to limit the disclosure to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the disclosure.
[0020] The terms comprises, comprising, or any other variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion so that a setup, device or method that comprises a list of components or steps does not include only those components or steps but may include other components or steps not expressly listed or inherent to such setup or device or method. In other words, one or more elements in a system or apparatus preceded by comprises or comprise does not or do not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of other elements or additional elements in the system or method.
[0021] In the following detailed description of the embodiment of the disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying drawing that forms part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration a specific embodiment in which the disclosure may be practiced. This embodiment is described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosure, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. The following description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
[0022]
[0023] As shown in
[0024] The assistance system 16 is also configured to determine that the driver of the ego vehicle 10 is about to perform said driver side turn. The assistance system 16 is further configured to determine a collision zone 44 in which said collision, resulting from the driver side turn, between the ego vehicle 10 and the other vehicle 18 is likely to occur. For example, the assistance system 16 is configured to determine a time until the other vehicle 18 is likely to enter the collision zone 44. Furthermore, the assistance system 16 is configured to determine a deceleration necessary for the other vehicle 18 to stop relative to the ego vehicle 10 (e.g., to stop before entering the collision zone 44). The assistance system 16 determines a risk of the collision between the ego vehicle 10 and the other vehicle 18 on the basis of the deceleration determined by the assistance system 16. Furthermore, the assistance system 16 supports the driver of the ego vehicle 10 on the basis of the risk determined by the assistance system 16.
[0025] Thus, as illustrated in
[0026] As shown in
[0027] For example, the assistance system 16 determines that a driver of the ego vehicle 10 is about to perform said driver side turn based on a yaw rate of the ego vehicle 10 and/or a steering angle of the ego vehicle 10. If, for example, the yaw rate and/or the steering angle of the ego vehicle 10 are, or are greater than, the respective threshold values, it is determined that the driver of the ego vehicle 10 is either about to perform the driver side turn or has already started the turn maneuver.
[0028] As shown in
[0029] Preferably, the assistance system 16 automatically brakes the ego vehicle 10, in particular if the collision risk is determined to be imminent (i.e., if the collision between the ego vehicle 10 and the other vehicle 18 is determined to be imminent and avoidable). For example, for auto-braking the ego vehicle 10 by the assistance system 16, there may be a set of conditions, and, for example, said auto-braking may result in a full stop of the ego vehicle 10. There may be several special calibration parameters to enable capabilities of the auto-braking. Moreover, for example, the assistance system 16 may perform a brake-hold, in which the brake of the ego vehicle 10 is automatically held. Thus, for example, once a braking sequence brought the ego vehicle 10 to a stop, certain conditions may be fulfilled before the assistance system 16 and thus, for example, a braking system for automatically braking the ego vehicle 10 releases the brake and gives control of the brake back to the driver. For example, in order to end brake-hold, a set of conditions should be met.
[0030] For example, the collision risk is assessed on the basis of a risk model. For example, the risk model determines a deceleration rate, in particular a predicted deceleration rate, that an approaching object such as the other vehicle 18 will need, in order to stop before entering the collision zone 44. For example, the risk model assigns a risk level to each oncoming vehicle based on the afore-mentioned deceleration.
[0031]
REFERENCE SIGNS
[0032] 10 ego vehicle [0033] 12 tractor [0034] 14 trailer [0035] 16 assistance system [0036] 18 other vehicle [0037] 20 double arrow [0038] 22 arrow [0039] 24 driver's side [0040] 26 right side [0041] 28 lane [0042] 30 intersection [0043] 32 arrow [0044] 34 double arrow [0045] 36 arrow [0046] 38 lane [0047] 40 environment