BURRING STRUCTURAL MEMBER
20250065389 ยท 2025-02-27
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B21D19/08
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A burring structural member resistant to fracture even if the burring structural part is bent back is provided. In the burring structural member of the present disclosure, a thickness T of the sheet-shaped part is 2.0 mm or more, a Charpy impact value vE(0) of the sheet-shaped part at 0 C. is 50 J/cm.sup.2 or more, a BCI value calculated by BCI=vE(0)/Lc based on the Charpy impact value vE(0) (J/cm.sup.2) and a maximum length Lc (m) of a crack at the inside bend of the bent wall part of the burring structural parts is 2.5 or more, and a curvature radius R (mm) of the inside bend of the bent wall part is larger than R1 calculated by R1=25/BCI1.5.
Claims
1. A burring structural member comprising: a burring hole; a burring wall part provided around the burring hole and having a vertical wall part and a bent wall part connected to the vertical wall part; and a sheet-shaped part provided around the burring wall part and connected to the bent wall part, wherein a thickness T of the sheet-shaped part is 2.0 mm or more, a Charpy impact value vE(0) of the sheet-shaped part at 0 C. is 50 J/cm.sup.2 or more, a BCI value calculated by the following formula (1) based on the Charpy impact value vE(0) and a maximum length Lc of a crack at an inside bend of the bent wall part is 2.5 or more, and a curvature radius R of the inside bend of the bent wall part is larger than R1 calculated by the following formula (2):
2. The burring structural member according to claim 1, wherein the curvature radius R of the bent wall part is 0.5 mm or more and 10.0 mm or less.
3. The burring structural member according to claim 1, wherein the thickness T of the sheet-shaped part is 2.0 mm or more and 8.0 mm or less.
4. The burring structural member according to claim 1, wherein a tensile strength TS of the sheet-shaped part is 780 MPa or more.
5. The burring structural member according to claim 4, wherein the tensile strength TS of the sheet-shaped part is 980 MPa or more.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0035] Below, one embodiment of a burring structural member of the present disclosure will be explained, but the burring structural member of the present disclosure is not limited to the embodiment.
[0036] As shown in
[0040] Below, the burring hole 21 and burring wall part 22 will sometimes be referred to all together as the burring structural part 20.
[0041] In the burring structural member 100, a thickness T of the sheet-shaped part 10 is 2.0 mm or more. A Charpy impact value vE(0) of the sheet-shaped part 10 at 0 C. is 50 J/cm.sup.2 or more. A BCI value calculated by the following formula (1) based on the Charpy impact value vE(0) and a maximum length Lc of a crack at the inside bend of the bent wall part 22b is 2.5 or more. A curvature radius R of the inside bend of the bent wall part 22b is larger than R1 calculated by the following formula (2):
1. Sheet-Shaped Part
[0043] As shown in
1.1 Planar Shape
[0044] As shown in
1.2 Thickness
[0045] As shown in
1.3 Charpy Impact Value vE(0) at 0 C.
[0046] The Charpy impact value vE(0)) of the sheet-shaped part 10 at 0 C. is 50 J/cm.sup.2 or more. If the vE(0) of the sheet-shaped part is too small, at the time of burring, work hardening becomes remarkable at the bent wall part 22b. Due to the effect of work hardening, fracture easily occurs at the time of bending back or compressing the burring wall part 22. If vE(0) is 50 J/cm.sup.2 or more, such a problem hardly ever occurs. In accordance with need, vE(0) may be 60 J/cm.sup.2 or more, 70) J/cm.sup.2 or more, or 80 J/cm.sup.2 or more. The upper limit of vE(0) is not particularly prescribed, but in accordance with need may be 300 J/cm.sup.2 or less, 250 J/cm.sup.2 or less, 200 J/cm.sup.2 or less, 160 J/cm.sup.2 or less, or 140 J/cm.sup.2 or less. In accordance with need, vE(0) may also be limited to a certain specific range (specific range with upper limit and lower limit). The lower limit and upper limit in this case may be any combination of said lower limit and upper limit. For example, vE(0) may be 50 J/cm.sup.2 or more and 200 J/cm.sup.2 or less, 50 J/cm.sup.2 or more and 180 J/cm.sup.2 or less, 50 J/cm.sup.2 or more and 160 J/cm.sup.2 or less, or 50 J/cm.sup.2 or more and 140 J/cm.sup.2 or less. Further, the Charpy impact value vE(0) of the sheet-shaped part 10 at 0 C. is found by subjecting a V-notch test piece of a subsize of 2.5 mm taken from the sheet-shaped part 10 to a Charpy impact test based on JIS Z 2242:2018. If the thickness is less than 2.5 mm, the test may be conducted for the entire thickness.
1.4 Tensile Strength TS
[0047] According to findings of the inventors, along with the higher strength of materials, cracks more easily form at the inside bend of the bent wall part 22b. That is, the problem of fracture when the burring wall part 22 is bent back or compressed occurs particularly easier in high strength steel sheet. On this point, the tensile strength TS of the sheet-shaped part 10 may be 780 MPa or more, 800 MPa or more, 850 MPa or more, 900 MPa or more, 950 MPa or more, 980) MPa or more, 1000 MPa or more, 1050 MPa or more, 1100 MPa or more, 1150 MPa or more, 1180 MPa or more, 1200 MPa or more, 1250) MPa or more, 1300 MPa or more, 1350 MPa or more, 1400 MPa or more, 1450) MPa or more, or 1470 MPa or more. The upper limit of the tensile strength of the sheet-shaped part 10 is not particularly prescribed, but for example may be 2500 MPa or less, 2200 MPa or less, 2000 MPa or less, 1800 MPa or less, 1500 MPa or less, 1300 MPa or less, or 1180 MPa or less. In accordance with need, the tensile strength TS of the sheet-shaped part 10) may be limited to a certain specific range (specific range with lower limit and upper limit). The lower limit and upper limit in this case may be any combination of said lower limit and upper limit. For example, the tensile strength TS of the sheet-shaped part 10 may be 780 MPa or more and 2500 MPa or less or may be 980 MPa or more and 2500 MPa or less. The tensile strength of the sheet-shaped part referred to in the present application may be one based on JIS Z 2241:2011.
2. Burring Structural Parts
[0048] As shown in
2.1. Burring Hole
[0049] As shown in
[0050] The size of the burring hole 21 is not particularly limited and may be determined in accordance with the application of the burring structural member 100. The burring hole 21 may have an open shape comprised of a circle of a diameter D. The diameter D of the burring hole 21 may, for example, be 5.0 mm or more, 10.0 mm or more, 20.0 mm or more, 30.0 mm or more, 40.0 mm or more, 50.0 mm or more, 60.0 mm or more, 70.0 mm or more, 80.0 mm or more, or 90.0 mm or more and may be 500 mm or less, 300 mm or less, 100 mm or less, 90.0 mm or less. 80.0 mm or less, 70.0 mm or less, 60.0 mm or less, 50.0 mm or less, 40.0 mm or less, 30.0 mm or less, 20.0 mm or less, or 10.0 mm or less. In accordance with need, the diameter D may also be limited to a certain specific range (a specific range having a lower limit and upper limit). The lower limit and upper limit in this case may be any combination of said lower limit and upper limit. For example, the diameter D may also be 5.0 mm or more and 500 mm or less. Further, the diameter D of the burring hole 21 may be 5 times or more or 10 times or more of the above thickness T and may be 100 times or less or 50 times or less of it. For example, diameter D of the burring hole 21 may also be 5 times or more and 100 times or less of the above thickness T.
2.2 Burring Wall Part
[0051] As shown in
2.2.1 Vertical Wall Part
[0052] As shown in
2.2.1.1 Orientation of Vertical Wall Part
[0053] The vertical wall part 22a may have a surface running along the punching direction at the time of the burring. For example, as shown in
2.2.1.2 Height
[0054] As shown in
2.2.2 Bent Wall Part
[0055] As shown in
2.2.2. 1 Length of Cracks at Inside Bend
[0056] As shown in
[0057] The maximum length Lc of a crack at the inside bend of the bent wall part 22b is identified by examining a cross-section of the burring structural parts 20. The cross-section of the burring structural parts 20 can be acquired, for example, by electrodischarge machining (for example, wire cutting). The examined cross-section covers the entirety of the inside bend of the bent wall part 22b. In examining the entirety of the inside bend, several images may be acquired. The examined field for each of the several images may be made 50 m50 m. Cross-sections obtained by dividing the same burring structural parts 20 into eight equal parts in the plan view are examined for the entirety of the inside bend, the maximum lengths of cracks at the inside bend at the different cross-sections are identified, and the longest among these is specified as the maximum length Lc. Further, in the present application, the length of a crack at the inside bend of the bent wall part 22b means the shortest distance from the front end of that crack (front end at deepest position from surface of bent wall part 22b) to the surface of the inside bend of the bent wall part 22b.
2.2.2.2 Curvature Radius
[0058] As shown in
[0059] As shown in
2.2.3 Thickness of Burring Wall Part
[0060] As shown in
2.3 BCI Value
[0061] In the burring structural member 100 of the present disclosure, the BCI value calculated by the following formula (1) is 2.5 or more. If the BCI value is too small, the effect of the crack length on the toughness would become great and even if specially modifying the shape etc. of the burring structural parts 20, fracture would easily occur upon being bent back or compressed. The upper limit of the BCI value is not particularly prescribed. The BCI value may, for example, be 2.5 or more and 30.0 or less. The BCI value may be 3.0 or more, 4.0 or more, or 5.0 or more and may be 28.0 or less, 26.0 or less, 24.0 or less, 22.0 or less, 20.0 or less, 18.0 or less, 16.0 or less, 14.0 or less, 12.0 or less, or 10.0 or less. Note that, in the present application, formula (1) is an empirical formula. The unit of the denominator Lc when the BCI value is calculated is m, the unit of the numerator vE(0) is J/cm.sup.2, and the unit of the BCI value calculated by the following formula (1) is J/(cm.sup.2.Math.m).
2.4 Relationship of Curvature Radius R and R1 Calculated by Formula (2)
[0062] In the burring structural member 100 of the present disclosure, the curvature radius R of the inside bend of the bent wall part 22b is larger than the R1 calculated by the following formula (2). Note that formula (2) is an empirical formula. In formula (2), the units do not match at the left side and right side. The unit of R1 at the left side is mm, while the unit of the BCI value entered at the right side is, as explained above, J/(cm.sup.2.Math.m). In calculating R1, the units are not particularly converted. That is, the value obtained by directly entering the BCI value calculated by the above formula (1) into formula (2) is R1 (mm). According to findings of the inventors, if the requirements relating to the above-mentioned thickness T, above-mentioned Charpy impact value vE(0), and above-mentioned BCI value are satisfied and the curvature radius R is greater than R1, fracture becomes harder to occur when bending back or compressing the burring structural parts 20 regardless of the material, strength, etc. of the burring structural member 100.
3. Material of Burring Structural Member
[0063] The burring structural member 100 is self evidently made of metal. The burring structural member 100 may, for example, be comprised of a steel material. In this case, the chemical composition and microstructure of the steel material are not particularly limited and may be suitably determined in accordance with the application of the burring structural member 100. According to the art of the present disclosure, it is possible to improve the fracture resistance at the time of bending back or compressing the burring structural parts 20 in burring structural members 100 having various chemical compositions and microstructures. As one example of the chemical composition, the chemical composition of the steel forming the burring structural member 100 may be, by mass %, C: 0.01 to 1.0%, Si: 0.01 to 3.50%, Mn: 0.10 to 5.00%, P: 0.100% or less, S: 0.0300% or less, N: 0.0100% or less, O: 0 to 0.020%, Al: 0 to 1.000% or less, Cr: 0 to 2.00%, Cu: 0 to 2.00%, Ni: 0 to 2.00%, Mo: 0 to 3.00%, Co: 0 to 3.00%, Nb: 0 to 0.150%, V: 0 to 1.00%, Ti: 0 to 1.00%, W: 0 to 1.00%, Sn: 0 to 1.00%, Sb: 0 to 0.50%, Ta: 0 to 0.10%, As: 0 to 0.050%, B: 0 to 0.0100%, Ca: 0 to 0.100%, Mg: 0 to 0.100%, Zr: 0 to 0.100%, Hf: 0 to 0.100%, REM: 0 to 0.0050%, and a balance of Fe and impurities. Further, in the above chemical composition, the lower limit of the content of optionally added elements may be 0.0001% or 0.001%.
4. Number and Positions of Burring Structural Parts
[0064] In the burring structural member 100, the number of burring structural parts 20 is not limited to one. The burring structural member 100 may have a plurality of burring structural parts 20. Further, in addition to the burring structural parts 20, the burring structural member 100 may be further provided with other burring structural parts projecting out from the first surface 11 at one side (projecting out in same direction as burring wall part 22) and may be further provided with other burring structural parts projecting out from the second surface 12 at the other side (projecting out in opposite direction from burring wall part 22). The positions of the burring structural parts 20 at the burring structural member 100 are not particularly limited and may be suitably determined in accordance with the application of the burring structural member 100.
5. Applications of Burring Structural Member
[0065] As explained above, the burring structural member 100 of the present disclosure is resistant to fracture of the burring wall part 22 when the burring wall part 22 is bent back or is compressed and has excellent durability. On this point, the burring structural member 100 of the present disclosure can be applied in harsh environments in which great external force is applied. For example, the burring structural member 100 of the present disclosure may be used as an undercarriage part of an automobile. As specific examples of an undercarriage part of an automobile, a lower arm or upper arm or trailing link may be mentioned.
6. Method of Production of Burring Structural Member
[0066] The burring structural member 100 of the present disclosure can be produced by processing a part of the metal sheet of the material being worked for burring. For example, as shown in
[0074] S1 and S2 may be performed using a punch or die. Here, the length of a crack at the inside bend formed at the bent wall part 22b of the burring structural part 20 can change due to the material or surface properties of the part forming the bent wall part 22b, the burring conditions (degree of decrease of thickness), etc. The inventors investigated Lc by the above method for numerous burring structural members with tensile strengths of the sheet-shaped parts of 780 MPa or more. As a result, satisfaction of the above formulas (1) and (2) could not be confirmed. On this point, to obtain a burring structural member satisfying the above formulas (1) and (2), special modification becomes required in the production process. For example, a burring structural member satisfying the above formulas (1) and (2) is obtained by performing one or both of the above S3 and S4.
[0075] In S3, the extent of contact of the worked member (metal sheet 101) and die at the time of burring is adjusted in advance before S2 so that both of the above requirements (A) and (B) are satisfied. For example, at the time of processing for burring, the part forming the inside bend of the bent wall part 22b may be adjusted so as not to contact the die as much as possible. Further, the part forming the vertical wall part 22a may contact the die. By specially modifying the processing conditions at the time of such burring processing as well, it is possible to obtain a burring structural member satisfying the above formulas (1) and (2).
[0076] In S4, the inside bend surface of the bent wall part 22b after the processing for burring is polished or ground so that both of the above requirements (A) and (B) are satisfied. For example, sandpaper or a grinder etc. may be used to polish or grind the inside bend surface of the bent wall part 22b. In the past, such polishing and/or grinding had not been performed. By polishing or grinding the inside bend surface of the bent wall part 22b, it is possible to reduce or remove cracks at the inside bend and possible to obtain a burring structural member satisfying the above formulas (1) and (2).
[0077] Further, the method of production of the present disclosure may be provided with the following S5: [0078] S5: Before S2, reducing the surface roughness of the surface at least at the part becoming the bent wall part 22b in the surface of the metal sheet 101.
[0079] According to the findings of the inventors, by reducing the surface roughness of a metal sheet before S2, it is possible to decrease the length of a crack formed at the inside bend of the bent wall part 22b after burring processing. The method of reducing the surface roughness of a metal sheet at S5 is not particularly limited. For example, it is possible to polish the surface of a metal sheet. The polishing may be performed by employing a known method. For example, mechanical polishing using sandpaper etc. or chemical polishing etc. may be mentioned.
EXAMPLES
[0080] Below, examples will be shown while explaining the effects etc. of the art of the present disclosure in further detail, but the art of the present disclosure is not limited to the following examples.
1. Evaluation Using Sheet-Shaped Test Pieces
[0081] In the following examples, sheet-shaped test pieces were evaluated by bending and bending back. There were no substantive differences in the effects of cracks at the inside bends on bending back between the case of bending back the bent parts for sheet-shaped test pieces which have been bent and the case of bending back burring wall parts for sheet-shaped test pieces which have been burred, so the following examples can be said to have suitably simulated the phenomena which occur when bending back a burring wall part of a burring structural member, and it can be said that the performance of the burring structural parts of a burring structural member was suitably evaluated.
1.1 Evaluation Conditions and Evaluation Criteria
1.1.1 Evaluation 1 (Evaluation of Bending)
[0082] As shown in
1.1.2 Evaluation 2 (Evaluation of Bend Back)
[0083] Under the same conditions as the above bending, test pieces with widths of 30 mm, lengths of 200 mm, and thicknesses of 2 mm were bent by predetermined curvature radii R. That is, for each of the bending conditions the same as the test pieces for observation of the cross-section after bending, another test piece was prepared and used for the later explained bend back test. A bent test piece can be deemed to have a maximum length Lc and BCI value similar to those in the above Evaluation 1. A bent test piece was bent back by pulling the two ends of the test piece. The bend back operation was performed until the bending angle of the test piece became 180 (that is, until a flat state with no bending). A case like the upper side test piece of
1.2 Results of Evaluation
[0084] The following Table 1 shows the results of evaluation. Further,
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 TS vE(0) Lc R BCI Pass/ Strength class [MPa] [J/cm.sup.2] [m] [mm] value R1 fail 980 MPa class 1005 53.2 10 0.5 5.32 3.20 Fail 1005 53.2 3 1.0 17.73 0.09 Pass 1005 53.2 20 1.0 2.66 7.90 Fail 1005 53.2 14 3.0 3.80 5.08 Fail 1005 53.2 2 3.0 24.18 0.47 Pass 1005 53.2 16 5.0 3.33 6.02 Fail 1005 53.2 6 5.0 8.87 1.32 Pass 1005 53.2 26 8.0 2.05 10.72 Fail 1005 53.2 3 8.0 17.73 0.09 Pass 1005 53.2 26 10.0 2.05 10.72 Fail 1005 53.2 23 10.0 2.31 9.31 Fail 1005 53.2 16 10.0 3.33 6.02 Pass 992 80.1 5 0.5 16.02 0.06 Pass 992 80.1 7 0.5 11.44 0.68 Fail 992 80.1 6 1.0 13.35 0.37 Pass 992 80.1 9 1.0 8.90 1.31 Fail 992 80.1 8 3.0 10.01 1.00 Pass 992 80.1 15 3.0 5.34 3.18 Fail 992 80.1 14 5.0 5.72 2.87 Pass 992 80.1 28 5.0 2.86 7.24 Fail 992 80.1 26 8.0 3.08 6.61 Pass 992 80.1 15 10.0 5.34 3.18 Pass 983 133.8 10 0.5 13.38 0.37 Pass 983 133.8 9 1.0 14.87 0.18 Pass 983 133.8 18 1.0 7.43 1.86 Fail 983 133.8 19 3.0 7.04 2.05 Pass 983 133.8 48 3.0 2.79 7.47 Fail 983 133.8 16 5.0 8.36 1.49 Pass 983 133.8 20 8.0 6.69 2.24 Pass 983 133.8 10 10.0 13.38 0.37 Pass 983 133.8 51 10.0 2.62 8.03 Pass 780 MPa class 785 152.2 24 3.0 6.34 2.44 Pass 785 152.2 33 3.0 4.61 3.92 Fail 1180 MPa class 1188 64.1 11 3.0 5.83 2.79 Pass 1188 64.1 21 3.0 3.05 6.69 Fail 1236 36.7 9 5.0 4.08 4.63 Fail
[0085] Further, in the above examples, the cases where test pieces with thicknesses of 2.0 mm were evaluated were illustrated, but similar effects are confirmed even in cases of thicknesses of more than 2.0 mm. On the other hand, if the thickness is below 2.0 mm, regardless of vE(0), BCI, or R, fracture inherently tends to become difficult when the burring structural parts are bent back, and the effect due to control of vE(0), BCI, or R is small.
2. Fabrication of Burring Structural Members
[0086] Steel sheets C to E having widths of 80 mm, lengths of 180 mm, and thicknesses of 2.3 mm were provided with punched holes. Here, the tensile strength TS of the steel sheet C was 983 MPa and the Charpy impact value vE(0) was 133.8J/cm.sup.2, the tensile strength TS of the steel sheet D was 785 MPa and the Charpy impact value vE(0) was 152.2J/cm.sup.2, and the tensile strength TS of the steel sheet E was 1188 MPa and the Charpy impact value vE(0) was 64.1J/cm.sup.2. The punched holes were made ones having centers at positions at the centers in the width directions of the steel sheets and positions 70 mm from ends in the length directions. The steel sheets were placed at the dies, then holes were punched out by a punch and the peripheral edges of the punched holes were raised to one side to thereby obtain burring structural members having burring holes and burring wall parts.
2.1 Comparative Examples 1-1, 2-1, 2-2, and 3-1
[0087] Each of the steel sheets C to E was processed for burring, then evaluated as follows as is without any particular polishing after the burring process. Further, Comparative Example 2-1 and Comparative Example 2-2 are similar except for the difference in state of contact between the steel sheet and die at the time of the burring process.
2.2 Examples 1-1, 2-1, 2-3, and 3-1
[0088] Each of the steel sheets C to E was processed for burring. At that time, the states of contact between the steel sheets and dies were changed from Comparative Example 1-1, 2-1, 2-2, and 3-1 (specifically, control is performed so that parts of bent wall parts forming the inside bends do not contact as much as possible). No polishing was performed after the burring.
2.3. Examples 1-2, 2-2, and 3-2
[0089] Each of the steel sheets C to E was processed for burring in the same way as Comparative Examples 1-1, 2-1, and 3-1. After the burring process, the inside bend surfaces of the bent wall parts were polished by sandpaper. Specifically, a burring structural member produced by the same burring method in advance was measured for the maximum length Lc of a crack at the inside bend of the bent wall part, then the target polished thickness of the inside bend of the bent wall part was determined. After that, the thickness of the bent wall part was measured while performing polishing so as to obtain the target polished thickness.
3. Evaluation of Burring Structural Member
[0090] Two of each of the burring structural members fabricated in the above way were prepared. One burring structural member of each was examined over the entire region of the inside bend using cross-sections dividing the burring structural part into eight equal parts in a plan view. The maximum length of a crack at the inside bend at each cross-section was identified and longest length among them was specified as the above maximum length Lc. The remaining one burring structural member of each was subjected to the following compressive load test. In the compressive load test, the temperature was held at 0 C. while applying a compressive stress to the projecting part of the burring in a direction vertical to the surface of the sheet-shaped part (in the case of
4. Results of Evaluation
[0091] The following Table 2 summarizes the maximum lengths Lc of the burring structural members, the fabrication conditions, the results of evaluation, etc.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Control of contact of inside Polishing bend of inside TS vE (0) surface bend Lc R BCI Pass/ Strength class [MPa] [J/cm.sup.2] and die surface [m] [mm] value R1 fail Comp. Ex. 1-1 780 MPa class 785 152.2 No No 70 1.0 2.17 10.00 Fail Ex. 1-1 785 152.2 Yes No 4 1.0 38.05 0.84 Pass Ex. 1-2 785 152.2 No Yes 1 1.0 152.20 1.34 Pass Comp. Ex. 2-1 980 MPa class 983 133.8 No No 165 2.0 0.81 29.33 Fail Comp. Ex. 2-2 983 133.8 No No 32 2.0 4.18 4.48 Fail Ex. 2-1 983 133.8 Yes No 12 2.0 11.15 0.74 Pass Ex. 2-2 983 133.8 No Yes 1 2.0 267.60 1.41 Pass Ex. 2-3 983 133.8 Yes No 26 4.0 5.15 3.36 Pass Comp. Ex. 3-1 1180 MPa class 1188 64.1 No No 36 2.0 1.78 12.54 Fail Ex. 3-1 1188 64.1 Yes No 5 2.0 12.82 0.45 Pass Ex. 3-2 1188 64.1 No Yes 1 2.0 64.10 1.11 Pass
[0092] From the results shown in Tables 1 and 2 and
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST
[0098] 10. sheet-shaped part [0099] 11. first surface [0100] 12. second surface [0101] 20. burring structural parts [0102] 21. burring hole [0103] 22. burring wall part [0104] 22a. vertical wall part [0105] 22ax. burring end face [0106] 22b. bent wall part [0107] 100. burring structural member [0108] 101. metal sheet [0109] 101a. punched hole [0110] 101b. peripheral edge of punched hole