Method of magnetizing natural and synthetic aluminosilicates

09663378 · 2017-05-30

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

Procedure for the magnetization of different inorganic surfaces, whether natural or synthetic, such as aluminosilicates, both synthetic and natural (natural zeolites, synthetic zeolites, alumina, allophane, among others) that give magnetic properties to those surfaces. Objectives of the present application are also the above mentioned surfaces, magnetized, and their different uses.

Claims

1. A procedure for the magnetization of inorganic surfaces by coating those inorganic surfaces with magnetite by in situ precipitation of iron oxide, comprising the steps of: heating a solution of FeSO.sub.4, with an Fe concentration of 0.1 to 2 M, at 3635 K, under an inert atmosphere in a container, placing the inorganic surfaces in the heated solution in the container; adding a 0.001 M solution of KNO.sub.3 prepared in 8 M NH.sub.4OH to the heated solution and inorganic surface in the container to form a mixture in the container; keeping the mixture at a constant temperature and an inert atmosphere for about 60 minutes to produce a product comprising the inorganic surfaces coated with magnetite; removing the product from the container; and drying the product at ambient temperature.

2. A procedure according to claim 1 wherein the inorganic surfaces are selected from the group consisting of natural inorganic surfaces or synthetic inorganic surfaces; wherein the natural inorganic surfaces are selected from the group consisting of natural zeolites, alumina, allophane, and combinations thereof; and wherein the synthetic inorganic surfaces are selected from the group consisting of synthetic aluminosilicates, synthetic zeolites, and combinations thereof.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1: An experimental scheme for getting magnetic products.

(2) FIG. 2: Response of magnetic zeolite to the presence of a magnet.

(3) FIG. 3: Image of magnetic zeolite obtained by scanning electron microscopy.

(4) FIG. 4: X-ray diffraction parameters of magnetic zeolite. Assignment of the most important signals corresponds to calcium sulfate (Gy), mordenite (Mo), and magnetite (M).

(5) FIG. 5: Elemental analysis of magnetic zeolite.

(6) FIG. 6: Hysteresis curve of synthetic iron oxide and magnetic zeolite.

(7) FIG. 7: (a) Petroleum on water. (b) Magnetic zeolite on the petroleum spot. (c) Application of the magnetic field. (d) Clean surface.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Procedure for Obtaining Magnetic Coatings

(8) The procedure for the incorporation of Fe magnetic coating on a surface uses an FeSO.sub.4 solution with an Fe concentration of 0.1 to 2 M, depending on the surface that it is desired to coat. The process is carried out in an inert atmosphere to avoid decomposition of the product, and at a temperature of 3635 K. The surface to be coated is then added and a 0.001 M solution of KNO.sub.3 prepared in an 8 M solution of NH.sub.4OH solution is added. All these solutions must be made according to the surface area that it is desired to coat. After the addition, the mixture is kept for 60 minutes in the container in which it was prepared, keeping the temperature constant and always in an inert atmosphere. The product is then removed from the container and it is dried at ambient temperature. FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the procedure used, where (a) represents the inlet through which the solutions are added; (b) represents the inlet for the inert gas required to keep an inert atmosphere; and (c) denotes the surface used to keep the temperature constant. This procedure requires constant stirring.

(9) After carrying out this procedure, which we will exemplify with zeolite, a first experimental test was ran which consisted in placing the magnetized surface near a magnet, whose response is shown in FIG. 2. Then other characterization tests were ran for the magnetized product, using as reference the demagnetized product. For this purpose different techniques were applied, such as:

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

(10) The samples obtained were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Preparation of the samples for microscopy consisted in drying them in an oven (50 C.), depositing them on carbon reticles, covering them with a thin carbon coat. Observation was made on a Zeiss DSM 960 microscope equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray detector (EDAX). The microscopy was made at a 35 angle, 15 kV acceleration voltages, a distance of 25 mm, and a current of 1-5 nA.

X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

(11) The samples were identified by powder X-ray diffraction on a Philips X'Pert diffractometer with K Cu radiation and a graphite monochromator. The XRD patterns were obtained from random films of the powder.

Vibrating Sample Magnetometry

(12) The magnetic properties of the different species were measured in a controlled temperature room on a vibrating sample magnetometer, whose results are given in the hysteresis curves.

Experimental Results

(13) The results of the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are presented in FIG. 3, showing a homogeneous species of magnetic zeolite, where a coating of sphere-type particles characteristic of magnetite is seen on the zeolite. By XRD characterization (FIG. 4) it is seen that the product corresponds to zeolite with a magnetite coating. The XRD shows that after the coating process a zeolite called mordenite (ICDD-PDF card n 00-006-0239) is obtained, with its characteristic signals at 0.400, 0.388, 0348 and 0.320 nm. The signals corresponding to magnetite at 0.484, 0.297, 0.253, 0.210, 0.162 and 0.148 nm are also seen.

(14) Electron scanning microscopy and X-ray diffraction deliver complementary results. During the magnetization process there is a displacement of calcium ions from natural zeolite which, together with the SO.sub.4.sup. incorporated with the Fe salt, precipitate forming CaSO.sub.4, whose presence is confirmed by the analysis made with the analytical probe (EDAX) during the scanning electron microscopy (FIG. 5). From the SEM and XRD results it is seen that the Fe deposit on natural zeolite is homogeneous and is constituted only by magnetite.

(15) Magnetization tests were made on natural zeolite and magnetic zeolite by means of so-called hysteresis curves. The magnetization curve of natural zeolite indicates that it has no magnetic components before the synthesis. However the magnetic zeolite (FIG. 6) presents a magnetization of 80 emu/g. The value found for magnetic zeolite indicates that the sample is constituted by a mixture of the two species (zeolite and magnetite), of which only one is magnetic and it is found in a smaller proportion. A consequence is that the magnetic saturation of the magnetic zeolite is 13 emu/g.

(16) The preparation of aluminosilicates with magnetic surface coatings was made with different ranges of (surface to be covered):(amount of iron deposited) ratios.

(17) For the magnetic zeolite (used to exemplify the process) the magnetic saturation is affected by the proportion of iron oxides used in the synthesis. It is possible to get higher magnetization saturation values by increasing the proportion of iron during the synthesis stage. An excessive increase of the magnitude of the coating would have as a consequence a reduction of the pores available to allow access to the active sites located in the internal surface of the zeolite, reducing its adsorption capacity and altering its absorption potential.

(18) The magnetic measurements of both the iron oxides and the magnetic zeolite have been made over time for weeks, with the magnetic saturation remaining constant, indicating good magnetic stability of the material prepared with the proposed methodology under normal storage conditions (25 C.).

(19) From the tests made it is possible to establish that the magnetization process can be carried out on different types of inorganic surfaces with different degrees of magnetization, depending on the use that will be given to the surfaces.

(20) The use of magnetized aluminosilicates can be quite varied because they do not contaminate, they do not have any adverse effects on the environment, and since they are harmless to human and animal health, to name just a few, they can be used for the elimination of organic as well as inorganic contaminants and radioactive elements in solution through sorption and immobilization, and they can also be used for the controlled release of medicines, as well as in catalysts and catalyst supports; in industrial processes, in agronomic applications, in animal nutrition and health, etc.

(21) As a specific example, magnetic zeolite can be used to remove oil spills on water (FIG. 7(a), (b)); this application has been shown in tests made at the laboratory level, where the recovery of the spilled product is seen with magnetic zeolite (FIG. 7(c)), to obtain as final product water free of that pollutant (FIG. 7(d)). For that purpose a test was made in which 10 mL of water were placed in a container and 1 mL of petroleum was placed on the water, where it was dispersed on the surface in the form of droplets, as shown in FIG. 7(a). A 250 mg sample of coated (magnetized) zeolite was placed over the liquid surface (FIG. 7(b)). Then a magnet passed over the surface extracted both the magnetized zeolite and the oil absorbed by it (FIG. 7(c)), recovering 244 mg of the zeolite used in the procedure. In this way a surface free of oil is obtained as shown in FIG. 7(d).