Emulsion with matte effects and excellent texture

Abstract

The present invention relates to a composition in the form of an emulsion, comprising: (a) at least one oil-absorbable organic particle which has an oil-absorbing capacity of 170 ml/100 g or more, preferably 250 ml/100 g or more, and more preferably 400 ml/100 g or more, and a volume-average particle size of less than 30 μm, preferably less than 25 μm, and more preferably less than 20 μm, (b) at least one oil; (c) at least one emulsifier; (d) water; and (e) optionally at least one additional oil-absorbable particle, wherein the oil-absorbing capacity of the total of the (a) oil-absorbable organic particle and the (e) additional oil-absorbable particle in the composition is more than 170 ml/100. The composition according to the present invention can provide long-lasting matte effects, while imparting excellent texture.

Claims

1. A cosmetic makeup composition in the form of an emulsion, comprising: (a) at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle which has an oil-absorbing capacity of 180 ml/100 g or more, a volume-average particle size of less than 30 μm, and a density ranging from 0.01 g/cm.sup.3 to 0.9 g/cm.sup.3; (b) at least one oil; (c) at least one emulsifier; and (d) water; wherein the (a) at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 10% by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.

2. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle has an oil-absorbing capacity of 350 ml/100 g or more.

3. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle has a volume-average particle size of from 8 to less than 12 μm.

4. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the amount of the (c) at least one emulsifier in the composition is from 0.01 to 20% by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition.

5. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the amount of the (d) water in the composition is from 1 to 99% by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition.

6. A cosmetic makeup composition, in the form of an emulsion, comprising: (a) at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle which has an oil absorbing capacity of 180 ml/100 g or more, a volume-average particle size of less than 30 μm, and a density ranging from 0.01 g/cm.sup.3 to 0.9 g/cm.sup.3; (b) at least one oil; (c) at least one emulsifier; (d) water; and (e) at least one additional oil-absorbable particle; wherein the (a) at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 10% by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, and wherein the (e) at least one additional oil-absorbable particle is present in an amount sufficient to provide a total oil-absorbing capacity of the (a) at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle and the (e) at least one additional oil-absorbable particle in the composition of more than 170 ml/100 g.

7. The composition according to claim 6, wherein the (e) at least one additional oil-absorbable particle comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of cellulose, silica, silicate, perlite, boron nitride, magnesium carbonate, magnesium hydroxide, hydrophobic silica, kaolin, talc, polyamide powders, powders of acrylic polymers, polymethyl methacrylate, of polymethyl methacrylate/ethylene glycol di methacrylate, of polyallyl methacrylate/ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, or of ethylene glycol dimethacrylate/lauryl methacrylate copolymer, silicones, or mixtures thereof.

8. The composition according to claim 6, wherein the (e) at least one additional oil-absorbable particle has an oil-absorbing capacity of 140 ml/100 g or more.

9. The composition according to claim 6, wherein the (e) at least one additional oil-absorbable particle has an oil-absorbing capacity of 350 ml/100 g or more.

10. The composition according to claim 6, wherein the oil-absorbing capacity of the total of the (a) at least one porous oil-absorbable organic particle and the (e) at least one additional oil-absorbable particle in the composition is more than 200 ml/100 g.

11. The composition according to claim 6, wherein the oil-absorbing capacity of the total of the (a) at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle and the (e) at least one additional oil-absorbable particle in the composition is more than 250 ml/100 g.

12. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises at least one ingredient selected from the group consisting of polyols, thickeners, preservatives, co-preservatives, or mixtures thereof.

13. A cosmetic process for a keratin substance, comprising applying to the keratin substance the composition according to claim 1.

14. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the amount of the (b) at least one oil in the composition is from 20% to 80% by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.

15. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the at least one oil is chosen from hydrocarbon oils, ester oils, silicone oils, synthetic oils, or mixtures thereof.

16. The composition according to claim 6, wherein the at least one oil is chosen from hydrocarbon oils, ester oils, silicone oils, synthetic oils, or mixtures thereof.

17. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle comprises at least one organic material derived from plants.

18. The composition according to claim 6, wherein the at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle comprises at least one organic material derived from plants.

19. A cosmetic makeup composition in the form of an emulsion, comprising: (a) from 0.1% to 10% by weight, relative to the weight of the composition, of at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle which has an oil-absorbing capacity of 300 ml/100 g or more, and a volume-average particle size ranging from 5 to less than 20 μm; (b) at least one oil chosen from hydrocarbon oils, ester oils, silicone oils, synthetic oils, or mixtures thereof; (c) at least one emulsifier chosen from anionic surfactants, non-ionic surfactants, amphoteric surfactants, zwitterionic surfactants, or mixtures thereof; (d) water; and (e) at least one additional component chosen from anionic polymers, cationic polymers, nonionic polymers, amphoteric polymers, UV filters, sunscreen agents, thickening agents, organic solvents, additional oil-absorbable particles, vitamins, suspending agents, stabilizers, dyes, or mixtures thereof.

20. The composition according to claim 19, comprising from 1% to 5% by weight, relative to the weight of the composition, of at least one porous oil-absorbable polylactic acid particle which has an oil-absorbing capacity ranging from 300 ml/100 g to 800 ml/100 g, a volume-average particle size ranging from 8 to less than 12 μm, and a density ranging from 0.01 g/cm.sup.3 to 0.9 g/cm.sup.3.

Description

EXAMPLES

(1) The present invention will be described in a more detailed manner by way of examples. However, these examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention. The examples below are presented as non-limiting illustrations in the field of the present invention.

Examples 1-6 and Comparative Examples 1-9

(2) The following compositions according to Examples 1-6 and Comparative Examples 1-9, shown in Tables 1-3, were prepared by mixing the ingredients shown in Tables 1-3 at room temperature. The numerical values for the amounts of the ingredients shown in Tables 1-3 are all based on “% by weight” as active raw materials.

(3) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 (W/O emulsion) Comp. Comp. Comp. Ex. 1 Ex. 2 Ex. 1 Ex. 2 Ex. 3 Porous Polylactic Acid 3.00 5.00 — — — Particle (Toraypearl ® PLA, Toray Industries Inc.) Non-Porous Polylactic — — 3.00 5.00 — Acid Particle (Ecosoft 608XF, Micro Powders) Dimethicone 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 Dimethicone - PEG/ 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 PPG-18/8 Dimethicone PEG-10 Dimethicone 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Dimethicone - 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 Dimethicone Crosspolymer Ethylhexyl 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Methoxycinnamate Tribehenin 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 Glycerin 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Butylene Glycol 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Caprylyl Glycol 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Phenoxyethanol 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Magnesium Sulfate 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Ethyl Alcohol 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Haze 82.7 90.3 54.1 64.8 54.6 Matteness 84.4 71.4 37.2 50.5 24.7 Wear of Matteness 9.4 3.4 40.4 32.2 13.4

(4) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 (O/W emulsion) Comp. Comp. Comp. Ex. 3 Ex. 4 Ex. 4 Ex. 5 Ex. 6 Porous Polylactic Acid 3.00 5.00 — — — Particle (Toraypearl ® PLA, Toray Industries Inc.) Non-Porous Polylactic — — 3.00 5.00 — Acid Particle (Ecosoft 608XF, Micro Powders) Water qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 Caprylyl Glycol 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Phenoxyethanol 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Carbomer 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Triethanolamine 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Glyceryl Stearate - 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 PEG-100 Stearate PEG-40 Stearate 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Cetyl Alcohol 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Stearyl Alcohol 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hydrogenated 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Polyisobutene Isohexadecane 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 Haze 71.8 84.3 44.4 55.1 6.0

(5) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 (O/W emulsion) Comp. Comp. Comp. Ex. 5 Ex. 6 Ex. 7 Ex. 8 Ex. 9 Porous Polylactic Acid 3.00 5.00 — — — Particle (Toraypearl ® PLA, Toray Industries Inc.) Non-Porous Polylactic — — 3.00 5.00 — Acid particle (Ecosoft 608XF, Micro Powders) Water qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 Glycerin 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Propylene Glycol 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Ammonium Polyacryloyldimethyl 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Taurate Saccharide Gum 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Ethanol 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Dimethicone 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 PEG-12 Dimethicone 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Dimethicone (5cst) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 In-vitro Anti-Shine Good Good Poor Poor 0 Index

(6) The properties of the porous polylactic acid particle and the non-porous polylactic acid particle are as shown in Table 4.

(7) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Porous Non-Porous Polylactic Polylactic Acid Particle Acid Particle Average Particle Size (μm) 11.0 8.0 Powder Density (g/cm.sup.3) 0.12 1.24 Absorption capacity (ml/100 g) Isononyl 465.9 77.6 Isononanoate Oleic Acid 456.2 97.8 Dimethicone 478.2 78.2 Water 384 61
[Evaluations]

(8) The compositions according to Examples 1-6 and Comparative Examples 1-9 were evaluated as follows.

(9) (Haze)

(10) The haze value of each of the compositions according to Examples 1-4 and Comparative Examples 1-6 in the form of a layer of 25 μm were measured with a Hazeguard (BYK).

(11) The results are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

(12) The results shown in Tables 1 and 2 show that the compositions according to the present invention (Examples 1-4) have higher haze values than the compositions according to Comparative Examples 1-6, which means that the present invention can diffuse more light, and therefore, the present invention can exert higher matte effects.

(13) (Matteness)

(14) Each of the compositions according to Examples 1 and 2, and Comparative Examples 1-3 was applied on a contrast card as a layer with a thickness of 50 and was dried for 24 hours at room temperature.

(15) The reflectance on the above layer after the application of the composition thereon was measured with a goniophotometer (GP-5, Murakami) as a 45° gloss value. The amount of the composition was the same as each other. A lower 45° gloss value shows better results.

(16) The results are shown in Table 1.

(17) The results shown in Table 1 show that the compositions according to the present invention (Examples 1 and 2) can provide better matteness than the compositions according to Comparative Examples 1-3, which means that the present invention can exert higher immediate matte effects.

(18) (Wear of Matteness)

(19) Each of the compositions according to Examples 1 and 2, and Comparative Examples 1-3 was applied on a contrast card as a layer with a thickness of 25 μm, and was maintained for 20 minutes at 35° C.

(20) The reflectance on the above layer was measured with a glossmeter (GM-268, Konika Minolta) as a 60° gloss value (original).

(21) 3.0 g of each of the compositions according to Examples 1 and 2, and Comparative Examples 1-3 was mixed with 0.4 g of an artificial sebum/sweat composition, and the mixture thus obtained was applied on a contrast card as a layer with a thickness of 25 μm, and was maintained for 20 minutes at 35° C. The formulation of the artificial sebum/sweat composition is shown in Table 5 below.

(22) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 (wt %) Oleic acid 20.0 Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) 1.0 Water 79.0 Total 100.0

(23) The reflectance on the above layer was measured with a glossmeter (GM-268, Konika Minolta) as a 60° gloss value (mix).

(24) The wear of matteness was calculated by the following equation:
Wear of Matteness=the 60° gloss value(mix)−the 60° gloss value(original)

(25) A lower value of “wear of matteness” means better results. The results are shown in Table 1.

(26) The results shown in Table 1 show that the compositions according to the present invention (Examples 1 and 2) have a lower value of “wear of matteness” than the compositions according to Comparative Examples 1-3, which means that the matte effects by the present invention are more resistant to sebum and/or sweat.

(27) (In-Vitro Anti-Shine Index)

(28) Each of the compositions according to Examples 5 and 6, and Comparative Examples 7-9 was applied on a contrast card as a layer with a thickness of 100 μm, and was dried for 24 hours at room temperature.

(29) An artificial sebum/sweat composition with the formulation shown in the above Table 5 was sprayed on the above layer on the contrast card, at room temperature.

(30) The reflectance on the above layer 9 minutes after the spraying of the artificial sebum/sweat composition thereon was measured with a glossmeter (GM-268, Konika Minolta) as a 60° gloss value. The amount of the artificial sebum/sweat composition sprayed on each of the above layers was the same as each other.

(31) The anti-shine index was calculated by the following equation:
Anti-Shine Index=(Reflectance of a sample 9 minutes after the spraying)−(Reflectance of a negative control)/(Reflectance of a positive control 9 minutes after the spraying)−(Reflectance of a negative control)

(32) As the negative control, the composition according to Comparative Example 9 was used. As the positive control, the composition according to Comparative Example 9 with the addition of silica silylate (aerogel) in an amount of 2% by weight relative to the total weight of the composition (the amount of water was reduced by 2% by weight) was used.

(33) The determined anti-shine index was categorized as follows.

(34) Good (long-lasting anti-shine effect): more than 70

(35) Poor (short-lasting anti-shine effect): 70 or less

(36) The results are shown in Table 3.

(37) The results shown in Table 3 show that the compositions according to the present invention (Examples 5 and 6) have better anti-shine index than the compositions according to Comparative Examples 7-9, which means that the matte effects by the present invention are more resistant to sebum and/or sweat.

Example 7 and Comparative Example 10

(38) The following compositions according to Example 7 and Comparative Example 10, shown in Table 6, were prepared by mixing the ingredients shown in Table 6 at room temperature. The numerical values for the amounts of the ingredients shown in Table 6 are all based on “% by weight” as active raw materials.

(39) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 (O/W emulsion) Comp. Ex. Ex. 7 10 Porous Polylactic Acid Particle 2.00 — (Toraypearl ® PLA, Toray Industries Inc.) (465.9 ml/100 g)* (11 μm)** Water qsp 100 qsp 100 Glycerin 7.00 7.00 Propylene Glycol 2.00 2.00 Ammonium Polyacryloyldimethyl Taurate 1.00 1.00 Saccharide Gum 2.00 2.00 Ethanol 8.00 8.00 Dimethicone 7.00 7.00 PEG-12 Dimethicone 0.70 0.70 Dimethicone (5cst) 4.00 4.00 In-vivo Anti Shine Index T.sub.0 28.1 ± 5.9 28.2 ± 5.4 T.sub.10min − T.sub.0 −10.4 ± 2.8   0 T.sub.2h 30.9 ± 6.3 44.4 ± 5.4 T.sub.2h − T.sub.0  2.8 ± 2.9 15.8 ± 5.6 Sensory Tests Application Smoothness 11.8 10.0 Skin Shine After 2 Minutes 2 7 *oil* absorption capability based on isononyl isononanoate **average particle size
[Evaluations]

(40) The compositions according to Example 7 and Comparative Example 10 were evaluated as follows.

(41) (In-Vivo Anti-Shine Index)

(42) Each of the compositions according to Example 7, and Comparative Example 10 was applied on the face of 28 panelists, in a room with conditions of a temperature of 37° C. and a relative humidity of 80%, as a layer with a thickness of 100 μm.

(43) The reflectance on the above layer just after the application of each composition thereon, 10 minutes after the application, and 2 hours after the application was measured with a glossmeter (GM-268, Konika Minolta) as a 60° gloss value.

(44) The results are shown in Table 6. In Table 6,

(45) T.sub.0 means the reflectance just after the application.

(46) T.sub.10min-T.sub.0 means the difference between the reflectance 10 minutes after the application and T.sub.0.

(47) T.sub.2h means the reflectance 2 hours after the application.

(48) T.sub.2h-T.sub.0 means the difference between the reflectance 2 hours after the application and T.sub.0.

(49) The results shown in Table 6 show that the composition according to the present invention (Example 7) has longer-lasting matte effects than Comparative Example 10, which means that the matte effects by the present invention can last for a longer period of time.

(50) (Sensory Tests)

(51) 25 panelists evaluated “application smoothness” and “skin shine after 2 minutes” after the use of the same amount of each of the compositions according to Example 7 and Comparative Examples 10.

(52) Each panelist took each composition in their hands, then applied it on their faces to evaluate “application smoothness” and “skin shine after 2 minutes” after the use of each composition, and rated it from 0 (low) to 15 (high).

(53) The average scores are shown in Table 6.

(54) The results shown in Table 6 show that the composition according to the present invention (Example 7) is better than the composition according to Comparative Example 10 in terms of smooth feeling of use and matte effects.

Examples 8-11 and Comparative Examples 11-13

(55) The following compositions according to Examples 8-11 and Comparative Examples 11-13, shown in Table 7, were prepared by mixing the ingredients shown in Table 7 at room temperature. The numerical values for the amounts of the ingredients shown in Table 7 are all based on “% by weight” as active raw materials.

(56) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 (O/W emulsion) Oil* Absorption Comp. Comp. Comp. Capability Ex. 8 Ex. 9 Ex. 10 Ex. 11 Ex. 11 Ex. 12 Ex. 13 Porous Polylactic Acid Particle 465.9 ml/100 g  2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 — — — (Toraypearl ® PLA, Toray Industries Inc.) (11 μm)** Silica Silylate 1090 ml/100 g — 0.50 1.00 1.50 — 2.00 — (Aerogel VM-2270, Dow Corning) Perlite  132 ml/100 g — — — — — — 2.00 Water — qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 Glycerin — 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Propylene Glycol — 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Ammonium Polyacryloyldimethyl — 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Taurate Saccharide Gum — 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Ethanol — 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Dimethicone — 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 PEG-12 Dimethicone — 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Dimethicone (5 cst) — 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Average Oil* Absorption Capacity 460 560 730 865 0 1090 132 of Powder Ingredients (ml/100 g) In-vitro Anti-Shine Index Good Good Good Good 0 Good Poor Sensory Test Application Smoothness Very Very Very Good Good Poor Poor Good Good Good *isononyl isononanoate **average particle size
[Evaluations]

(57) The compositions according to Examples 8-11 and Comparative Examples 11-13 were evaluated as follows.

(58) (In-Vitro Anti-Shine Index)

(59) Each of the compositions according to Examples 8-11, and Comparative Examples 11-13 was applied on a contrast card as a layer with a thickness of 100 μm, and was dried for 24 hours at room temperature.

(60) An artificial sebum/sweat composition with the formulation shown in the above Table 5 was sprayed on the above layer on the contrast card, at room temperature.

(61) The reflectance on the above layer 9 minutes after the spraying of the artificial sebum/sweat composition thereon was measured with a glossmeter (GM-268, Konika Minolta) as a 60° gloss value. The amount of the artificial sebum/sweat composition sprayed on each of the above layers was the same as each other.

(62) The anti-shine index was calculated by the following equation:
Anti-Shine Index=(Reflectance of a sample 9 minutes later)−(Reflectance of a negative control)/(Reflectance of a positive control 9 minutes later)−(Reflectance of a negative control)

(63) As the negative control, the composition according to Comparative Example 11 was used. As the positive control, the composition according to Comparative Example 12 including silica silylate (aerogel) in an amount of 2% by weight relative to the total weight of the composition (the amount of water was reduced by 2% by weight) was used.

(64) The determined anti-shine index was categorized as follows.

(65) Good (long-lasting anti-shine effect): more than 70

(66) Poor (short-lasting anti-shine effect): 70 or less

(67) The results are shown in Table 7.

(68) The results shown in Table 7 also show that the compositions according to the present invention (Examples 8-11) can provide better matte effects which can last for a longer time than Comparative Examples 11 and 13, which means that the matte effects by the present invention are better and can last for a longer period of time.

(69) (Sensory Tests)

(70) 25 panelists evaluated “application smoothness” after the use of the same amount of each of the compositions according to Examples 8-11 and Comparative Examples 11-13.

(71) Each panelist took each composition in their hands, then applied it on their faces to evaluate “application smoothness” after the use of each composition, and rated it from 0 (low) to 15 (high), which was then classified in the following 3 categories based on the average of the rate.

(72) Very Good: from 12 to 15

(73) Good: from 8 to less than 12

(74) Poor: from 0 to less than 8

(75) The results are shown in Table 7.

(76) The results shown in Table 7 show that the compositions according to Examples 8-11 have smoother feeling of use than Comparative Examples 12 and 13, which means that the compositions according to the present invention can provide better feeling of use.

(77) As a result, it is clear from Table 7 that the compositions according to the present invention can provide both long-lasting matte effects and good feeling of use.

(78) It should be noted that the compositions according to Examples 9 and 10 can show further better results as compared to the composition according to Example 8. This shows that a combination of an oil-absorbable organic particle with an oil-absorbing capacity of 170 ml/100 g and another oil-absorbable particle with an oil-absorbing capacity of 140 ml/100 g or more can provide very excellent matte and sensorial effects.

Example 12 and Comparative Examples 14-16

(79) The following compositions in the form of a W/O emulsion according to Example 12 and Comparative Examples 14-16, shown in Table 8, were prepared by mixing the ingredients shown in Table 8 at room temperature. The numerical values for the amounts of the ingredients shown in Table 8 are all based on “% by weight” as active raw materials.

(80) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Comp. Comp. Comp. Ex. 12 Ex. 14 Ex. 15 Ex. 16 Dimethicone 15.30 15.30 15.30 15.30 Dimethicone - PEG/PPG-18/8 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Dimethicone PEG-10 Dimethicone 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Dimethicone - Dimethicone 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 Crosspolymer Dimethicone - Dimethiconol 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Tribehenin 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Isononyl Isononanoate 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Iron oxides - Mica 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Titanium Dioxide - Mica 2.46 2.46 2.46 2.46 Silica Silylate 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Vinyl Dimethicone/Methicone 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Silsesquioxane Porous Polylactic Acid Particle 2.00 — — — (PLA-2, Porous block) (9 μm)* (380 ml/100 g)** Porous Polylactic Acid Particle — 2.00 — — (PLA-1, Porous sphere) (30 μm)* (150 ml/100 g)** PMMA (10 μm)* (120 ml/100 g)** — — 2.00 — Silica (3 μm)* (370 ml/100 g)** — — — 2.00 Boron Nitride 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Water qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 qsp 100 Glycerin 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Butylene Glycol 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Caprylyl Glycol 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Phenoxyethanol 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Magnesium Sulfate 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Ethanol 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Average Oil* Absorption Capacity 213.5 163.5 157.0 179.0 of Powder Ingredients (ml/100 g) Optical Matteness Very Good Fair Good Good Lasting of Immediate Matte Effects Very Good Fair Fair Good Application Smoothness Good Fair Fair Poor *average particle size **oil absorption capacity based on isononyl isononanoate
[Evaluations]

(81) The compositions according to Example 12 and Comparative Examples 14-16 were evaluated as follows.

(82) (Sensory Tests)

(83) 25 panelists evaluated “application smoothness” after the use of the same amount of each of the compositions according to Example 12 and Comparative Examples 14-16.

(84) Each panelist took each composition in their hands, then applied it on their faces to evaluate “optical matteness”, “lasting of immediate matte effects”, and “application smoothness” after the use of each composition, and rated it from 0 (low) to 15 (high), which was then classified in the following 3 categories based on the average of the rate.

(85) Very Good: from 12 to 15

(86) Good: from 8 to less than 12

(87) Poor: from 0 to less than 8

(88) The results are shown in Table 8.

(89) As a result, it is clear from Table 8 that the compositions according to the present invention can provide both excellent matte effects and good feeling of use.

Example 13 and Comparative Example 17

(90) The following compositions in the form of a W/O emulsion according to Example 13 and Comparative Example 17, shown in Table 9, were prepared by mixing the ingredients shown in Table 9 at room temperature. The numerical values for the amounts of the ingredients shown in Table 9 are all based on “% by weight” as active raw materials.

(91) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Comp. Ex. Ex. 13 17 PEG-10 Dimethicone 3.0 3.0 Bis-PEG/PPG-14/14 Dimethicone 1.00 1.00 (and) Dimethicone Dimethicone 20.7 20.7 Isododeane 10.0 10.0 Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate 7.0 7.0 Tocopherol 0.1 0.1 Trimethylsiloxysilicate 5.0 5.0 Disteardimonium Hectorite 0.5 0.5 Porous Polylactic Acid Particle 3.00 — (Toraypearl ® PLA, Toray Industries Inc.) (11 μm)* (465.9 ml/100 g)** Water qsp 100 qsp 100 Butylene Glycol 5.0 5.0 Magnesium Sulfate 0.7 0.7 Ethanol 12.0 12.0 Matteness (T.sub.3h − T.sub.imm) 4.37 ± 1.64 5.36 ± 2.33 *average particle size **oil absorption capacity based on isononyl isononanoate
[Evaluations]

(92) The compositions according to Example 13 and Comparative Example 17 were evaluated as follows.

(93) (Matteness)

(94) Each of the compositions according to Example 13 and Comparative Example 17 was applied on a contrast card as a layer with a thickness of 50 μm, and was dried for 24 hours at room temperature.

(95) On the above layer, a powder foundation was applied such that the layer of the powder foundation was 50 μm. The composition of the powder foundation used was the same for Example 13 and Comparative Example 17.

(96) The reflectance on the above layer just after (T.sub.imm) and 3 hours after (T.sub.3h) the application of the powder foundation was measured with a goniophotometer (GP-5, Murakami) as a 45° gloss value.

(97) The difference between T.sub.imm and T.sub.3h was determined. The results are shown in Table 9.

(98) The results shown in Table 9 show that the composition according to the present invention (Example 13) can provide higher matteness than the compositions according to Comparative Example 17, which means that the present invention can provide longer-lasting matte effects, even if the composition according to the present invention is used as a makeup base.

Examples 14 and 15, and Comparative Examples 18 and 19

(99) The following compositions in the form of a serum according to Examples 14 and 15, and Comparative Examples 18 and 19, shown in Table 10, were prepared by mixing the ingredients shown in Table 10 at room temperature. The numerical values for the amounts of the ingredients shown in Table 10 are all based on “% by weight” as active raw materials.

(100) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Comp. Comp. Ex. 14 Ex. 15 Ex. 18 Ex. 19 Porous Polylactic Acid Particle 2.00 1.00 — — (Toraypearl ® PLA, Toray Industries Inc.) (465.9 ml/100 g)* (11 μm)** Boron Nitride — 1.00 1.00 — HDI/Trimethylol hexyllactone — — 1.00 — crosspolymer Water qsp100 qsp100 qsp100 qsp100 Glycerin 6.86 6.86 6.86 6.86 Phenoxyethanol 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 Propylene Glycol 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 Tetrasodium EDTA 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Caprylyl Glycol 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 Plant Extracts 2.26 2.26 2.26 2.26 Salicylic acid 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Methyl Gluceth-20 2.94 2.94 2.94 2.94 PPG-5 Cetech-20 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Ellagic Acid 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 Dimethicone 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 Xanthan Gum 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Acrylate Crosspolymer Glyceryl Stearate (and) PEG-100 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 Stearate Stearic Acid 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 Cetyl Alcohol 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Diisopropyl Sebacate 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41 Octyldodecanol 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.96 Tocopherol 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Fragrance 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Potassium Hydroxide 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ascorbyl Glucoside 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.96 Citric Acid 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sodium Citrate 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Polyacrylamide (and) C13-14 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Isoparaffin (and) Laureth-7 Powder 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Average Oil* Absorption Capacity 465.9 280.0 91.0 0 of Powder Ingredients (ml/100 g) In-vitro Anti-Shine Index Good Good Poor 0 *oil absorption capacity based on isononyl isononanoate **average particle size
[Evaluations]

(101) The compositions according to Examples 14 and 15, and Comparative Examples 18 and 19 were evaluated as follows.

(102) (In-Vitro Anti-Shine Index)

(103) Each of the compositions according to Examples 14 and 13, and Comparative Examples 18 and 19 was applied on a contrast card as a layer with a thickness of 100 μm, and was dried for 24 hours at room temperature.

(104) An artificial sebum/sweat composition with the formulation shown in the above Table 5 was sprayed on the above layer on the contrast card, at room temperature.

(105) The reflectance on the above layer 9 minutes after the spraying of the artificial sebum/sweat composition thereon was measured with a glossmeter (GM-268, Konika Minolta) as a 60° gloss value. The amount of the artificial sebum/sweat composition sprayed on each of the above layers was the same as each other.

(106) The anti-shine index was calculated by the following equation:
Anti-Shine Index=(Reflectance of a sample 9 minutes after the spraying)−(Reflectance of a negative control)/(Reflectance of a positive control 9 minutes after the spraying)−(Reflectance of a negative control)

(107) As the negative control, the composition according to Comparative Example 19 was used. As the positive control, the composition according to Comparative Example 19 with the addition of silica silylate (aerogel) in an amount of 2% by weight relative to the total weight of the composition (the amount of water was reduced by 2% by weight) was used.

(108) The determined anti-shine index was categorized as follows.

(109) Good (long-lasting anti-shine effect): more than 70

(110) Poor (short-lasting anti-shine effect): 70 or less

(111) The results are shown in Table 10.

(112) The results shown in Table 10 show that the compositions according to the present invention (Examples 14 and 15) have better anti-shine index than the compositions according to Comparative Examples 18 and 19, which means that the matte effects by the present invention are more resistant to sebum and/or sweat.

Examples 16 and 17

(113) The following compositions in the form of an O/W emulsion according to Examples 16 and 17, shown in Table 11, were prepared by mixing the ingredients shown in Table 11 at room temperature. The numerical values for the amounts of the ingredients shown in Table 11 are all based on “% by weight” as active raw materials.

(114) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Ex. 16 Ex. 17 Porous Polylactic Acid Particle 2.00 1.00 (Toraypearl ® PLA, Toray Industries Inc.) (11 μm)* (465.9 ml/100 g)** Silica Silylate — 1.00 Water qsp 100 qsp 100 Adenosine 0.04 0.04 Phenoxyethanol 0.50 0.50 Glycerin 1.50 1.50 Propylene Glycol 3.00 3.00 Disodium EDTA 0.05 0.05 Styrene/Acrylates Copolymer 0.50 0.50 Dextrin Palmitate 0.25 0.25 Cetyl Alcohol 0.50 0.50 Stearic Acid 1.00 1.00 Ceteth-10 0.40 0.40 Isopropyl Lauroyl Sarcosinate 5.00 5.00 Drometrizole Trisiloxane 1.00 1.00 Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine 3.00 3.00 Dimethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate 3.00 3.00 Diisopropyl Sebacate 7.00 7.00 Ethylhexyl Triazone 5.00 5.00 Titanium Dioxide (and) Aluminum Hydroxide 2.50 2.50 (and) Stearic Acid Caprylyl Glycol 0.30 0.30 Acrylate/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer 0.25 0.25 Potassium Hydroxide 0.21 0.21 Tocopheryl Acetate 0.20 0.20 Ammonium Polyacryloyldimethyl Taurate 0.18 0.18 Plant Extracts 0.55 0.55 Ethanol 7.00 7.00 Fragrance 0.40 0.40 Average Oil** Absorption Capacity 300 650 of Powder Ingredients (ml/100 g) In-vitro Anti-Shine Index Good Good Sensory Test Application Smoothness Good Good *average particle size **oil absorption capacity based on isononyl isononanoate
[Evaluations]

(115) The compositions according to Examples 16 and 17 were evaluated as follows.

(116) (In-Vitro Anti-Shine Index)

(117) Each of the compositions according to Examples 16 and 17 was applied on a contrast card as a layer with a thickness of 100 μm, and was dried for 24 hours at room temperature.

(118) An artificial sebum/sweat composition with the formulation shown in the above Table 5 was sprayed on the above layer on the contrast card, at room temperature.

(119) The reflectance on the above layer 9 minutes after the spraying of the artificial sebum/sweat composition thereon was measured with a glossmeter (GM-268, Konika Minolta) as a 60° gloss value. The amount of the artificial sebum/sweat composition sprayed on each of the above layers was the same as each other.

(120) The anti-shine index was calculated by the following equation:
Anti-Shine Index=(Reflectance of a sample 9 minutes after the spraying)−(Reflectance of a negative control)/(Reflectance of a positive control 9 minutes after the spraying)−(Reflectance of a negative control)

(121) As the negative control, the composition according to Example 16 without the porous polylactic acid particle was used. As the positive control, the composition according to Example 16 with the addition of silica silylate (aerogel) in an amount of 2% by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, instead of the porous polylactic acid particle, was used.

(122) The determined anti-shine index was categorized as follows.

(123) Good (long-lasting anti-shine effect): more than 70

(124) Poor (short-lasting anti-shine effect): 70 or less

(125) The results are shown in Table 11.

(126) (Sensory Test)

(127) 25 panelists evaluated “application smoothness” after the use of the same amount of each of the compositions according to Examples 16 and 17.

(128) Each panelist took each composition in their hands, then applied it on their faces to evaluate “application smoothness” after the use of each composition, and rated it from 0 (low) to 15 (high), which was then classified in the following 3 categories based on the average of the rate.

(129) Very Good: from 12 to 15

(130) Good: from 8 to less than 12

(131) Poor: from 0 to less than 8

(132) The results are shown in Table 11.

(133) As a result, it is clear from Table 11 that the compositions according to the present invention can provide both excellent matte effects and good feeling of use.