Method for producing an Al/TiC nanocomposite material
09650295 · 2017-05-16
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C22C1/058
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C22C32/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B35/626
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
The invention relates to a process for preparing an Al/TiC nanocomposite material comprising an aluminum matrix in which particles comprising nano-sized TiC are dispersed. It comprises: a) preparing a first powder mixture by contacting a graphite powder with a titanium aluminide powder of the formula Al.sub.3Ti, both powders having micro- or higher sized particles; b) preparing a second powder mixture by mechanosynthesis of the first powder mixture, the second powder mixture being formed in all or part by particles comprising both titanium aluminide and graphite; c) compressing the second powder mixture to obtain one or more greens; d) reactively sintering the green(s), thereby the Al/TiC nanocomposite material is obtained.
Claims
1. A process for preparing a Al/TiC nanocomposite material comprising an aluminum matrix in which nano-sized particles comprising TiC are dispersed, the process comprising: contacting a graphite powder with a titanium aluminide powder of the formula Al.sub.3Ti, both powders having micro- or higher sized particles, thereby obtaining a first powder mixture; performing a mechanosynthesis of the first powder mixture to have a mechanical alloying of the first powder mixture, thereby obtaining a second powder mixture, wherein all or part of particles of the second powder mixture comprise both a titanium aluminide phase and a graphite phase; compressing the second powder mixture to obtain one or more greens; and performing a reactive sintering of the green(s), thereby obtaining the Al/TiC nanocomposite material, wherein the mechanosynthesis is performed in an enclosure of a milling device, the enclosure being provided with a rotor which, during the mechanosynthesis, carries out successive cycles, each cycle having a milling phase and a deagglomeration phase, the rotor rotating, at each cycle, at a first speed during a first duration during the milling phase of the cycle and at a second speed during a second duration during the deagglomeration phase of the cycle, the first speed being at least 200 rpm higher than the second speed and the first duration being at least twice as long as the second duration.
2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the mechanosynthesis is performed for a duration comprised between 24 and 48 hours.
3. The process according to claim 1, wherein the mechanosynthesis is performed in an enclosure of a milling device, the enclosure being not cooled during the mechanosynthesis.
4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the first speed is between 1,400 and 800 rpm and the second speed is between 1,000 and 400 rpm.
5. The process according to claim 1, wherein the first duration is between 1 and 5 minutes.
6. The process according to claim 1, wherein the mechanosynthesis is performed in an enclosure of a milling device, the enclosure being filled to between 15 and 30% of its volume.
7. The process according to claim 6, wherein the enclosure includes milling balls and a ratio of volume of the first powder mixture to volume of the milling balls is between 5 and 12%.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second powder mixture comprises at most 35 weight % of TiC.
9. The process according to claim 1, wherein the reactive sintering is performed at a temperature between 900 C. and 1,400 C.
10. The process according to claim 9, wherein the reactive sintering is performed for a duration between 1 and 15 minutes.
11. The process according to claim 9, wherein the reactive sintering temperature is reached by heating the green(s) at a rate between 100 C./min and 400 C./min.
12. The process according to claim 1, wherein the reactive sintering is performed at a temperature of 1,000 C. and for a duration between 1 and 5 minutes, the temperature being reached by heating the green(s) at a rate of 300 C./min.
13. The process according to claim 1, further comprising, after obtaining a second powder mixture and before compressing the second powder mixture, sieving the second powder mixture, to select particles having a size between 50 and 200 micrometers.
14. The process according to claim 1, wherein the mechanosynthesis is performed for a duration equal to 36 hours.
15. The process according to claim 1, wherein the second duration is comprised between 20 seconds and 3 minutes.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
DETAILED DISCLOSURE OF PARTICULAR EMBODIMENTS
(6) In order to illustrate the process object of the invention, the steps to follow for making an Al/TiC nanocomposite material will now be described in detail.
(7) According to the invention, the nanocomposite material is obtained according to the following reaction:
Al.sub.3Ti.sub.(s)+C.sub.(s).fwdarw.TiC.sub.(s)+3 Al.sub.(l)
(8) This reaction corresponds to the reaction (5) as mentioned by Nukami and Flemings in document [1]. The reaction (4) as mentioned in this document allows, in theory, to achieve an Al/TiC composite too.
(9) Thermodynamic calculations show that the reaction (4) is easily made from 777 C. (1,050 K), whereas the reaction (5) is possible irrespective of the temperature.
(10) Therefore, it appears that the Al/TiC composite can be manufactured in different ways according to different reaction pathways. It also appears that the reaction (5) could be quite feasible by high energy milling.
(11) However, although milling can result in the nearly full formation of an Al/TiC composite according to the reaction (5), the milling is used, within the scope of the present invention, to mix at the finest scale possible the different components and minimize the contamination by milling tools. The reaction (5) really starts only during the heat treatment of reactive sintering and leads to the formation of the Al/TiC composite. As the Al.sub.3Ti and C phases have been dispersed homogeneously during milling, the reactive sintering enables an Al/TiC nanocomposite having nano-sized TiC reinforcements to be obtained.
(12) To perform a high energy milling within the scope of the present invention, an attritor type high energy mill is used. It is herein a Simoloyer CM01, provided by the manufacturer Zoz GmbH. This mill has a horizontal axis of rotation, and a milling chamber with a volume of 0.5 L enabling between 15 and 50 g of powder to be produced with 1 000 to 2 000 g of balls (100C6 balls). In this mill, it is possible to vary the speeds and durations of rotation in order to restrict agglomeration of the powders during milling. Finally, various equipments enable milling to be performed under a controlled atmosphere (rough vacuum or gas).
(13) Milling Conditions
(14) In order to determine the best milling conditions enabling as close as possible a mixture of Al.sub.3Ti and C to be generated and pollution by the milling tools to be minimized, factorial experiments have been implemented involving five parameters for the mill.
(15) Two of the five parameters involve the amount of powder introduced in the mill. It is the filling rate of the milling chamber (enclosure) and the ratio between the volume of the powder and the volume of the balls introduced.
(16) Two other parameters are related to the milling cycle: the durations of the plateaus at the two different speeds at which the rotor rotates upon milling, a first speed during the milling phase and a second speed, lower than the first speed, during the deagglomeration phase. These speeds are arbitrarily chosen equal to 1,200 and 800 rpm.
(17) Finally, the last parameter varying during the different tests is the milling temperature.
(18) The factorial experiments consist in making all the possible combinations between the different factors considered.
(19) In the present case, there are five factors with two levels, since each parameter can assume two values; therefore 2.sup.5, namely 32 tests, must be made.
(20) The experiments thus enable the effects of all the factors to be measured and the interactions between these factors to be taken into account.
(21) From these factorial experiments with five factors having two levels, fractional experiments have been determined by keeping only the tests for which the five-order interaction, namely between the 5 parameters, is at the level one. These experiments reduce the number of tests to 16.
(22) The values of the levels of each of the factors have been defined as follows:
(23) Filling Rate of the Enclosure
(24) The two values chosen to be tested are 15 and 25%. The lowest value corresponds to the filling rate recommended by the mill manufacturer during millings performed in a similar mill provided with a 2-liter enclosure.
(25) Ratio of the Powder and Balls Volumes: V.sub.P/V.sub.B
(26) Both values chosen to be tested correspond to a powder volume used of 5 and 12% of the balls volume used.
(27) As for the filling rate, the value recommended by the manufacturer (5%) acts as a reference.
(28) Durations of the Rotation Speeds (Plateaus)
(29) Milling is made according to n cycles, each cycle comprising a milling phase, made at a first speed, and a deagglomeration phase, made at another speed, less quick than the first speed.
(30) The durations of each phase of the n cycles have been arbitrarily defined equal to two or four minutes for the high speed and thirty seconds or two minutes for the low speed, which is intended to act mainly to shutdown the milling cycle (fracturation, welding) and thus promote particle deagglomeration.
(31) Milling Temperature
(32) The milling temperature is not strictly the parameter considered since the mill is not equipped with any regulation system. However, it is provided with a system for cooling the enclosure by a water circulation between both walls of the enclosure. By virtue of the water circulation, the temperature is equilibrated at about 25 C. The implementation of a heating tape driven by a temperature regulating device, for example a Eurotherm type device, enables the enclosure to be heated up to 80 C. The milling is thereby chosen to be tested at 25 C. and at 80 C.
(33) The results obtained highlight the essential role of the ratio V.sub.P/V.sub.B and the filling rate. Thus, in the light of the results obtained, it seems that it is preferable to use a high ratio V.sub.P/V.sub.B (12% rather than 5%) to avoid a strong contamination and to use a high filling rate (25% rather than 15%) to promote reaction progress.
(34) When both these factors are set, it seems preferable, to limit contamination, not to cool the enclosure (80 C. rather than 25 C.) and to use a milling cycle made of short plateaus (the first speed at 800 rpm having a plateau of 2 min and the second speed 1 200 rpm having a plateau of 30 s). In fact, the plateaus are used to improve the reaction yield and, to a lesser extent, to promote reaction progress.
(35) The interpretation of the results of the sixteen millings performed has allowed to define, among the chosen values, which values enable optimum milling conditions to be obtained to promote mixing and restrict contamination. However, it is highly probable that better milling conditions could be defined by using other level values than those used in the factorial experiments.
(36) Using these optimum milling conditions, at the end of the milling, a powder consisting of about 2.7 aluminum atoms per a titanium atom is obtained, which corresponds to the mean obtained for the sixteen millings.
(37) Preparing the Mixture
(38) Carbon exists as three allotropic forms: graphite, fullerene, and diamond carbon. Within the scope of the present invention, graphite is used as a carbon source for synthesizing TiC. The solid lubricant property of the graphite is thus exploited, due to its structure in leaflets, to restrict bounding of the metal powder to the walls of the enclosure upon milling.
(39) In order to avoid an oxygen contamination, it is preferable that the graphite powder undergoes a high temperature degassing heat treatment before being introduced in the milling enclosure.
(40) As regards Al.sub.3Ti, the choice of this intermetallic is justified by its fragile character, which enables it to be more easily mixed with graphite during milling and to minimize contamination. The choice of Al.sub.3Ti is on the other hand justified by the fact that this intermetallic is, as can be observed on the equilibrium diagram AlTi (
(41) The compound Al.sub.3Ti can crystallize as three crystallographic phases: D0.sub.22, D0.sub.23, and L1.sub.2.
(42) Calculations of electronic structure predict a greater stability in the phase D0.sub.23, followed by phase D0.sub.22 and phase L1.sub.2. However, this stability very strongly depends on the atomic environment, relaxation effects and crystal seeding mode. In fact, experimentally, it is mainly the phase D0.sub.22 that is most frequently found. Thus, to form the Al.sub.3Ti powder which is used as a starting powder in the process according to the invention, Al.sub.3Ti ingots which only contain (or at a vast majority) the phase D0.sub.22 are used.
(43) In this exemplary embodiment, a micro-sized graphite powder (100 m in size) is used, provided by Mersen (formerly Carbone Lorraine) which is previously degassed under a secondary vacuum at 1,000 C. for 12 h and an Al.sub.3Ti powder obtained by grinding Al.sub.3Ti ingots D0.sub.22 so as to obtain nuggets having sizes lower than 800 m.
(44) Both these powders are then weighed in stoechiometric proportions to obtain a mixture leading to the following reaction after sintering:
Al.sub.3Ti+C.fwdarw.3Al+TiC
(45) Milling
(46) As has been seen previously, it is preferable to use a ratio V.sub.P/V.sub.B equal to 12%, rather than a ratio equal to 5%, and a filling rate of 25% rather than 15%.
(47) Since the mill enclosure that it is used has a volume of 0.5 L, the mass of the powders introduced into the milling chamber is thus 63 g, whereas the mass of the balls is 1 261.7 g.
(48) The enclosure temperature is held at 80 C. throughout the milling duration.
(49) The other milling parameters are the following ones. The mill rotor makes n cycles each of:
(50) 900 rpm for 2 min 30 s (milling phase);
(51) 600 rpm for 30 s (deagglomeration phase).
(52) The high energy mechanosynthesis or milling must be made for a sufficient time to obtain a closely mixed powder having an Al.sub.3Ti phase and a C phase. The time required for milling is several hours.
(53) In this exemplary embodiment, two millings under argon have being performed in the above set out milling conditions for two different milling durations: a first milling for 24 hours and a second milling for 48 hours.
(54) At the end of the milling time, the composition of both powders has been analyzed by the X-ray diffraction technique (X-ray diffractometry technique or DRX, this technique enabling to determine the nature of the phases crystallized).
(55) By investigating the DRX pattern obtained with this milled powder (
(56) As regards the 48-hour milling (
(57) It is to be noted that in
(58) In view of the results obtained, it is chosen to make a 36-hour milling, which seems to be the best trade-off to obtain a powder not much contaminated by the materials of the mill (in particular iron) and an homogeneous sintered material.
(59) Sieving
(60) The powder milled for 36 hours is preferably sieved in order to select the powder having a particle size between 50 and 200 m.
(61) Compacting
(62) The powder milled for 36 hours, possibly sieved, is then compacted as pellets. For example, a single effect uniaxial compacting (2 GPa) or a cold isostatic compression (CIF) of the milled powder, which is degassed beforehand, can for example be conducted. This degassing enables the formation of porosities to be avoided during compacting.
(63) Thus, pellets having an 8 mm diameter with a relative density of about 80% are obtained.
(64) Reactive Sintering
(65) Determining the Sintering Temperature
(66) The sintering temperature has to allow both full formation of titanium carbide and densification of Al/TiC.
(67) In literature, this sintering temperature is between and the melting temperature of the major compound in a mixture. In the present case, this melting temperature is about 1,370 C. Three sintering temperatures have therefore been tested using a dilatometer on the pellets of the powder milled for 36 hours: 900 C., 950 C. and 1,000 C.
(68) For these tests, the heating rate is 100 C./min and the sample is held 15 minutes in a plateau, and then cooled at 100 C./min. Then, the X-ray diffractometry (DRX) is used in order to analyze the phases present in the sintered material (
(69) At 900 C., it is observed that the reaction is not complete: the phase D0.sub.22 is the major phase and the TiC lines appear.
(70) At 950 C., the aluminum is the major phase and the oxycarbide phase (TiOC) has nearly disappeared in favor of titanium carbide.
(71) Finally, at 1 000 C., the reaction seems total. The trace of the phase D0.sub.22 is observed.
(72) Among these three sintering temperatures, the 1,000 C. temperature seems preferable.
(73) Determining the Temperature Raise Rate
(74) The behavior of the milled compacted powder is different depending on the heating rate used and reveals different phenomena which have a consequence on the final microstructure of the sintered material.
(75) Besides the formation of the TiC carbide at about 900 C., the significant grain growth of the phase D0.sub.23 at about 400 C. is also a major event that has to be taken into account since it results in losing the powder nanostructure and implies a restricted subsequent reactivity of aluminide with graphite.
(76) Besides, it is established that at about 800 C., titanium carbide being present is decomposed in contact with liquid aluminum to form aluminum carbide (Al.sub.4C.sub.3) and the phase D0.sub.22 (document [3]).
(77) Both these events, if developed, thus risk to prevent the total reaction between Al.sub.3Ti and C.
(78) Therefore, three 15-minute sintering cycles at 1 000 C. have been tested with three distinct heating rates, namely 10 C./min, 100 C./min and 300 C./min, and their effects on the reaction progress, TiC particle size and phase distribution have been observed.
(79) Particle Size
(80) The assessment of the aluminum and titanium carbide particle size from the X-ray patterns (Scherrer formula) enables the effect of the heating rate on the particle size to be accounted for.
(81) The results are given in the table below, which gives the size of Al and TiC crystallites as function of the temperature rise rate.
(82) By analyzing these results, it appears that, among the heating rates tested, the higher the heating rate, the smaller the crystallite size. These results agree with the seeding theory.
(83) TABLE-US-00001 Crystallites size 10 C./min 100 C./min 300 C./min Al 36 nm 34 nm 25 nm TiC 25 nm 22 nm 13 nm
(84) Reaction Progress
(85) The X-ray patterns of samples heated at 10 C./min, 100 C./min and 300 C./min are given in
(86) It is observed that the sample heated at 10 C./min clearly contains a significant fraction of phase D0.sub.22 and an important amount of aluminum carbide.
(87) For higher heating rates, the results are less clear: no secondary phases are observed for a heating rate of 100 C./min, whereas a low fraction of D0.sub.22 is present in the sample heated at 300 C./min.
(88) In view of the results, a heating rate of 300 C./min is preferably used, which promotes the finest microstructure.
(89) Determining the Plateau Duration
(90) If a sample of milled and compacted powder is held at a temperature higher than the melting temperature of aluminum, it can be the location of undesirable reactions leading to the formation of secondary phases, the nature of these phases depending on the stoechiometry of the titanium carbide. However, if the thermodynamic conditions are met to allow for these reactions, their progress degree is controlled by kinetics. Thereby, it will be attempted to determine the optimum plateau duration at 1 000 C. necessary to form an Al/TiC nanocomposite and restrict the formation of these secondary phases.
(91) Three plateau durations have been investigated: 1 min, 5 min, and 15 min, the heating rate being 300 C./min and the plateau temperature being set to 1,000 C.
(92)
(93) It turns out that for a 1 minute plateau, the microstructure is the most homogeneous. Indeed, for a very short annealing, TiC rich Al/TiC zones are more numerous and the set is much more homogeneous than for longer plateau durations.
(94) Conclusion on the Optimum Conditions for Sintering
(95) The ideal heat treatment among the values tested would thereby be an annealing with a temperature rise rate of 300 C./min, at 1 000 C., for 1 minute.
(96) By this method, a material comprising nano-sized particles of titanium carbide coated in an aluminum matrix is obtained. The typical microstructure is mainly made of micro-sized domains of aluminum being rich in nano-sized TiC particles, coexisting with TiC-depleted domains; all these domains being separated by pure aluminum threads. A homogenous and very poorly iron-contaminated Al/TiC nanocomposite material is thus actually obtained.
(97) The specific gravity of the sintered material is 3.07, which corresponds to about 91% of the theoretical specific gravity.
REFERENCES CITED
(98) [1] Nukami and Flemings In Situ Synthesis of TiC Particulate-Reinforced Aluminum Matrix Composites, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Volume 26A, pages 1877-1884, July (1995). [2] Murray Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, 19 (1988), page 243. [3] Viala et al. Diffusion Paths and Reaction Mechanisms in the High-Temperature Chemical Interaction Between Carbon and Titanium Aluminides, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 203 (1995), pages 222-237.