Imaging lens and imaging apparatus
09651760 ยท 2017-05-16
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
G02B13/02
PHYSICS
G02B15/14
PHYSICS
Abstract
An imaging lens consists essentially of, in order from the object side, a positive first lens group, a negative second lens group, a stop, and a positive third lens group. Focusing is effected by moving only the second lens group along the optical axis direction. Each of the first lens group and the third lens group includes at least three positive lenses and at least two negative lenses. The imaging lens satisfies the condition expression (1) below:
0.53<f2/f<0.9(1),
where f2 is a focal length of the second lens group, and f is a focal length of the entire system when the imaging lens is focused on an object at infinity.
Claims
1. An imaging lens consisting of, in order from the object side, a first lens group having a positive refractive power, a second lens group having a negative refractive power, a stop, and a third lens group having a positive refractive power, wherein focusing is effected by moving only the second lens group along the optical axis direction, the first lens group comprises at least three positive lenses and at least two negative lenses, the second lens group comprises a negative lens, the third lens group comprises at least three positive lenses and at least two negative lenses, and the condition expression (1) below is satisfied:
0.53<f2/f<0.9(1), where f2 is a focal length of the second lens group, and f is a focal length of the entire system when the imaging lens is focused on an object at infinity.
2. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the condition expression (2) below is satisfied:
66<n2<98(2), where n2 is an Abbe number with respect to the d-line of the most image-side negative lens of the second lens group.
3. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the condition expression (3) below is satisfied:
0.2<f1/f3<0.85(3), where f1 is a focal length of the first lens group, and f3 is a focal length of the third lens group.
4. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the condition expression (4) below is satisfied:
0.1<(R3rR3f)/(R3r+R3f)<0.5(4), where R3f is a radius of curvature of the object-side surface of the most image-side positive lens of the third lens group, and R3r is a radius of curvature of the image-side surface of the most image-side positive lens of the third lens group.
5. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the condition expression (5) below is satisfied:
0.62<f1/f<1.2(5), where f1 is a focal length of the first lens group.
6. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the condition expression (6) below is satisfied:
0.6<f3/f<2.3(6), where f3 is a focal length of the third lens group.
7. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the condition expression (7) below is satisfied:
0.5<f1/f2<1.5(7), where f1 is a focal length of the first lens group.
8. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the condition expression (8) below is satisfied:
1.5<f3/f2<4.5(8), where f3 is a focal length of the third lens group.
9. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first lens group comprises a cemented lens formed by, in order from the object side, a biconvex lens and a biconcave lens that are cemented together.
10. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second lens group consists of one negative lens.
11. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second lens group consists of a cemented lens formed by one negative lens and one positive lens that are cemented together.
12. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the condition expression (1-1) below is satisfied:
0.54<f2/f<0.85(1-1).
13. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 2, wherein the condition expression (2-1) below is satisfied:
67<n2<88(2-1).
14. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 3, wherein the condition expression (3-1) below is satisfied:
0.3<f1/f3<0.8(3-1).
15. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 4, wherein the condition expression (4-1) below is satisfied:
0.15<(R3rR3f)/(R3r+R3f)<0.45(4-1).
16. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 5, wherein the condition expression (5-1) below is satisfied:
0.65<f1/f<1(5-1).
17. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 6, wherein the condition expression (6-1) below is satisfied:
0.65<f3/f<1.9(6-1).
18. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 7, wherein the condition expression (7-1) below is satisfied:
0.6<f1/f2<1.4(7-1).
19. The imaging lens as claimed in claim 8, wherein the condition expression (8-1) below is satisfied:
1.6<f3/f2<4(8-1).
20. An imaging apparatus comprising the imaging lens as claimed in claim 1.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(12) Hereinafter, embodiments of the disclosure will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
(13) This imaging lens consists essentially of, in order from the object side along the optical axis Z, a first lens group G1 having a positive refractive power, a second lens group G2 having a negative refractive power, an aperture stop St, and a third lens group G3 having a positive refractive power. It should be noted that the aperture stop St shown in
(14) This imaging lens is a lens system employing an inner focus system where focusing is effected by moving only the second lens group G2 along the optical axis direction. In the example shown in
(15) When this imaging lens is applied to an imaging apparatus, a cover glass, various filters, such as an infrared cut-off filter and a low-pass filter, etc., may be provided between the lens system and the image plane Sim, depending on the configuration of the imaging apparatus. In the example shown in
(16) Providing the first lens group G1 with a positive refractive power is advantageous for reducing the entire length of the lens system. The first lens group G1 includes at least three positive lenses and at least two negative lenses. This allows each of the at least three positive lenses to share a part of the positive refractive power of the first lens group G1, thereby allowing successful correction of spherical aberration while favorably reducing the entire length of the lens system, and this is advantageous for achieving a small F-number. Providing the at least two negative lenses is advantageous for successfully correcting chromatic aberration, astigmatism, and field curvature.
(17) For example, as in the example shown in
(18) The first lens group G1 preferably includes a cemented lens formed by, in order from the object side, a biconvex lens and a biconcave lens that are cemented together. This allows successfully correcting chromatic aberration.
(19) The second lens group G2 includes at least one negative lens. The second lens group G2 is an only lens group having a negative refractive power among the three lens groups. Using the second lens group G2 as a focusing group which is moved during focusing allows reducing the amount of movement of the focusing group during focusing, thereby allowing reducing the entire length of the lens system.
(20) The second lens group G2 may consist of one lens component. This allows simplifying the mechanism for moving the focusing group. The lens component as used herein refers to a lens where only two surfaces, i.e., the object-side surface and the image-side surface, are in contact with air along the optical axis, and one lens component as used herein refers to one single lens or one cemented lens.
(21) Specifically, as in the examples shown in
(22) The third lens group G3 is a lens group having a positive refractive power. This allows reducing the effective diameters of the lenses of the first lens group G1 to allow size reduction of the lens system, and is advantageous for correction of aberrations. The third lens group G3 includes at least three positive lenses and at least two negative lenses. Each of the at least three positive lenses can share a part of the positive refractive power of the third lens group G3, thereby allowing successful correction of spherical aberration while favorably reducing the entire length of the lens system, and this is advantageous for achieving a small F-number. Providing the at least two negative lenses is advantageous for successfully correcting chromatic aberration, astigmatism, and field curvature.
(23) For example, as in the examples shown in
(24) It should be noted that, in the case where the third lens group G3 adopts the above-described five-lens configuration or six-lens configuration, vibration compensation may be performed by moving the lens L33 and the lens L34 together in directions perpendicular to the optical axis to shift the position of the image. In this case, only a small amount of movement of the lens L33 and the lens L34 can provide a large amount of shift of the image position in the image plane Sim, and this allows ensuring good image performance while achieving size reduction of the apparatus.
(25) This imaging lens satisfies the condition expression (1) below:
0.53<f2/f<0.9(1),
where f2 is a focal length of the second lens group, and f is a focal length of the entire system when the imaging lens is focused on an object at infinity.
(26) Setting the value of f2/f such that it does not become equal to or smaller than the lower limit of condition expression (1) allows keeping the refractive power of the second lens group G2 sufficiently small, and this facilitates correction of longitudinal chromatic aberration. Also, setting the value of f2/f such that it does not become equal to or smaller than the lower limit of condition expression (1) allows preventing over correction of spherical aberration when the imaging lens is focused on a close object, and this allows suppressing fluctuation of spherical aberration and astigmatism in a well-balanced manner when the imaging lens is focused from infinity to a close object distance. Setting the value of f2/f such that it does not become equal to or greater than the upper limit of condition expression (1) allows keeping the refractive power of the second lens group G2 sufficiently large to reduce the amount of movement the second lens group G2 during focusing, and this contributes to reduction of the entire length of the lens system.
(27) In order to enhance the advantageous effects with respect to condition expression (1), it is preferred to satisfy the condition expression (1-1) below, and it is more preferred to satisfy the condition expression (1-2) below:
0.54<f2/f<0.85(1-1)
0.62<f2/f<0.85(1-2).
(28) It is preferred that the imaging lens satisfy any one of or any combination of the condition expressions (2) to (8) below:
66<n2<98(2),
0.2<f1/f3<0.85(3),
0.1<(R3rR3f)/(R3r+R3f)<0.5(4),
0.62<f1/f<1.2(5),
0.6<f3/f<2.3(6),
0.5<f1/f2<1.5(7),
1.5<f3/f2<4.5(8),
where n2 is an Abbe number with respect to the d-line of the most image-side negative lens of the second lens group, f1 is a focal length of the first lens group, f3 is a focal length of the third lens group, f is a focal length of the entire system when the imaging lens is focused on an object at infinity, R3f is a radius of curvature of the object-side surface of the most image-side positive lens of the third lens group, and R3r is a radius of curvature of the image-side surface of the most image-side positive lens of the third lens group.
(29) Setting the value of n2such that it does not become equal to or smaller than the lower limit of condition expression (2) facilitates correction of longitudinal chromatic aberration during focusing. Setting the value of n2such that it does not become equal to or greater than the upper limit of condition expression (2) facilitates correction of chromatic aberration, in particular, lateral chromatic aberration, during focusing.
(30) Setting the value of f1/f3 such that it does not become equal to or smaller than the lower limit of condition expression (3) allows preventing the refractive power of the first lens group G1 from becoming excessively strong, and this allows suppressing astigmatism and field curvature. Alternatively, this allows preventing the refractive power of the third lens group G3 from becoming excessively weak, and this contributes to reduction of the entire length of the lens system. Setting the value of f1/f3 such that it does not become equal to or greater than the upper limit of condition expression (3) allows preventing the refractive power of the first lens group G1 from becoming excessively weak, thereby allowing reducing the effective diameters of the lenses of the first lens group G1, and achieving size reduction of the lens system. Alternatively, this allows preventing the refractive power of the third lens group G3 from becoming excessively strong, and this allows providing a sufficient backfocus.
(31) Setting the value of (R3rR3f)/(R3r+R3f) such that it does not become equal to or smaller than the lower limit of condition expression (4) allows suppressing spherical aberration. Setting the value of (R3rR3f)/(R3r+R3f) such that it does not become equal to or greater than the upper limit of condition expression (4) allows suppressing field curvature.
(32) Setting the value of f1/f such that it does not become equal to or smaller than the lower limit of condition expression (5) allows preventing the refractive power of the first lens group G1 from becoming excessively strong, and this allows suppressing astigmatism and field curvature. Setting the value of f1/f such that it does not become equal to or greater than the upper limit of condition expression (5) allows preventing the refractive power of the first lens group G1 from becoming excessively weak, and this contributes to reduction of the entire length of the lens system.
(33) Setting the value of f3/f such that it does not become equal to or smaller than the lower limit of condition expression (6) allows preventing the refractive power of the third lens group G3 from becoming excessively strong, and this allows suppressing spherical aberration, or providing a sufficient backfocus. Setting the value of f3/f such that it does not become equal to or greater than the upper limit of condition expression (6) allows preventing the refractive power of the third lens group G3 from becoming excessively weak, and this contributes to reduction of the entire length of the lens system.
(34) Satisfying condition expressions (5) and (6) at the same time facilitates successful correction of aberrations while reducing the entire length of the lens system.
(35) Setting the value of f1/f2 such that it does not become equal to or smaller than the lower limit of condition expression (7) allows preventing the refractive power of the first lens group G1 from becoming excessively strong, and allows preventing the refractive power of the second lens group G2 from becoming excessively weak, and this allows successful correction of spherical aberration, in particular, spherical aberration that occurs when the imaging lens is focused on a close object. Setting the value of f1/f2 such that it does not become equal to or greater than the upper limit of condition expression (7) allows preventing the refractive power of the first lens group G1 from becoming excessively weak, and allows preventing the refractive power of the second lens group G2 from becoming excessively strong, and this allows avoiding over correction of spherical aberration.
(36) Setting the value of f3/f2 such that it does not become equal to or smaller than the lower limit of condition expression (8) allows preventing the refractive power of the third lens group G3 from becoming excessively strong, and allows preventing the refractive power of the second lens group G2 from becoming excessively weak, and this allows successfully correcting spherical aberration and providing a sufficient backfocus. Setting the value of f3/f2 such that it does not become equal to or greater than the upper limit of condition expression (8) allows preventing the refractive power of the third lens group G3 from becoming excessively weak, and allows preventing the refractive power of the second lens group G2 from becoming excessively strong, and this contributes to reduction of the entire length of the lens system, or allows suppressing spherical aberration and longitudinal chromatic aberration.
(37) Satisfying condition expressions (7) and (8) at the same time facilitates successfully correcting spherical aberration, and this is advantageous for achieving a small F-number.
(38) In order to enhance the advantageous effects with respect to the condition expressions (2) to (8) above, it is more preferred to satisfy the condition expressions (2-1) to (8-1) below in place of the condition expressions (2) to (8), respectively:
67<n2<88(2-1)
0.3<f1/f3<0.8(3-1)
0.15<(R3r-R3f)/(R3r+R3f)<0.45(4-1),
0.65<f1/f<1(5-1),
0.65<f3/f<1.9(6-1),
0.6<f1/f2<1.4(7-1),
1.6<f3/f2<4(8-1).
(39) The preferred configurations and possible configurations described above can be combined in any manner, and are preferably adopted in a selective manner depending on the required specifications. For example, the above-described configurations can be adopted as appropriate to form an imaging lens that employs an inner focus system, has a small F-number, and allows keeping high optical performance for a wide range of object distance with successfully corrected fluctuation of aberrations during focusing, while reducing size increase of the lens system. It should be noted that a small F-number as used herein refers to an F-number of 2.0 or less in the state where the imaging lens is focused on an object at infinity.
(40) Next, numerical examples of the imaging lens of the disclosure are described. Values shown in Examples 1 to 5 below are normalized such that the focal length of the entire system when the imaging lens is focused on an object at infinity is 100.0.
Example 1
(41) The configuration diagram of the imaging lens of Example 1 is shown in
(42) Table 1 shows basic lens data of the imaging lens of Example 1, and Table 2 shows specifications and values of variable surface distances of the imaging lens. In Table 1, each value in the column of Si represents the surface number of the i-th (where i=1, 2, 3, . . . ) surface, where the object-side surface of the most object-side element is the 1st surface and the number is sequentially incremented toward the image side, each value in the column of Ri represents the radius of curvature of the i-th surface, and each value in the column of Di represents the surface distance between the i-th surface and the i+l-th surface along the optical axis Z. The sign with respect to the radius of curvature is provided such that a positive radius of curvature indicates a surface shape that is convex toward the object side, and a negative radius of curvature indicates a surface shape that is convex toward the image side.
(43) Further, in Table 1, each value in the column of Ndj represents the refractive index with respect to the d-line (the wavelength of 587.6 nm) of the j-th (where j=1, 2, 3, . . . ) optical element, where the most object-side element is the 1st element and the number is sequentially incremented toward the image side, and each value in the column of vdj represents the Abbe number with respect to the d-line of the j-th optical element. Table 1 also shows the aperture stop St, the optical member PP, and the image plane Sim. In Table 1, the surface number and the text (St) are shown at the position in the column of the surface number corresponding to the aperture stop St, and the surface number and the text (Sim) are shown at the position in the column of the surface number corresponding to the image plane Sim. Further, in Table 1, the value of each variable surface distance that is changed during focusing is represented by the symbol DD[ ], where the surface number of the object-side surface corresponding to each surface distance is shown within [ ].
(44) Table 2 shows values of lateral magnification , focal length f of the entire system, F-number FNo., full angle of view 2, and variable surface distances, which values are with respect to the d-line. The symbol IT shown next to 2 means that the unit is degrees. In Table 2, values in the states where the imaging lens is focused on an object at infinity, where the imaging lens is focused on an object at the middle position, and where the imaging lens is focused on an object at the closest object distance of the lens are shown in the columns denoted by Infinity, Middle, and Closest, respectively. It should be noted that the numerical values shown in the tables below are rounded at predetermined decimal places.
(45) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Example 1 Si Ri Di Ndj dj 1 400.3424 6.7438 1.48749 70.24 2 168.2879 0.3929 3 61.6551 10.2699 1.43875 94.94 4 136.3968 1.7393 1.80610 40.93 5 496.9335 1.4187 6 46.2150 7.6391 1.81600 46.62 7 30.1158 8.3276 1.49700 81.54 8 514.9436 DD[8] 9 210.8993 2.7831 1.84666 23.88 10 106.8861 5.8171 1.59522 67.73 11 36.5648 DD[11] 12(St) 1.6665 13 31.9856 6.1569 1.88300 40.76 14 21.3768 8.1740 1.59522 67.73 15 100.3293 2.1109 16 52.7420 4.8045 1.84666 23.88 17 105.3092 8.0876 1.88300 40.76 18 16.3508 8.3325 19 19.7037 8.3324 1.48749 70.24 20 41.1981 12.6433 21 1.1110 1.51633 64.14 22 4.0962 23(Sim)
(46) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Example 1 Infinity Middle Closest 0.00 0.02 0.05 f 100.0 97.48 94.90 FNo. 1.93 1.97 2.01 2[] 10.8 10.6 10.2 DD[8] 2.29 3.65 5.07 DD[11] 10.41 9.04 7.63
(47)
(48) The symbols, the meanings, and the manners of description of the data explained above with respect to Example 1 also apply to the other examples described below, unless otherwise noted, and the same explanations are not repeated below.
Example 2
(49) The configuration diagram of the imaging lens of Example 2 is shown in
(50) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Example 2 Si Ri Di Ndj dj 1 162.0569 4.1037 1.48749 70.24 2 824.4278 0.0556 3 69.3059 6.7493 1.48749 70.24 4 412.4028 0.3933 5 66.2963 8.0791 1.49700 81.54 6 177.8554 2.7833 1.78800 47.37 7 100.5520 1.2652 8 52.1313 3.2997 1.78800 47.37 9 32.5626 8.3394 1.49700 81.54 10 2249.8073 DD[10] 11 185.5510 5.3523 1.92286 18.90 12 116.8106 4.0497 1.48749 70.24 13 30.8514 DD[13] 14(St) 0.1501 15 34.6128 2.2294 1.88300 40.76 16 25.4105 6.2478 1.59522 67.73 17 83.0447 2.1126 18 82.5951 8.1978 1.84666 23.88 19 131.9355 4.3777 1.74400 44.79 20 16.9566 8.3394 21 19.6778 7.8486 1.49700 81.54 22 37.4682 12.6535 23 1.1119 1.51633 64.14 24 3.3577 25(Sim)
(51) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Example 2 Infinity Middle Closest 0.00 0.02 0.03 f 100.0 97.42 94.79 FNo. 1.91 1.94 1.98 2[] 10.8 10.6 10.2 DD[10] 5.53 6.99 8.50 DD[13] 11.81 10.35 8.83
Example 3
(52) The configuration diagram of the imaging lens of Example 3 is shown in
(53) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Example 3 Si Ri Di Ndj dj 1 78.9995 6.7523 1.48749 70.24 2 297.4701 0.0555 3 100.9196 6.7584 1.84666 23.78 4 958.4680 0.3938 5 52.4120 10.6602 1.49700 81.54 6 236.6176 3.8971 1.95375 32.32 7 107.3771 2.0990 8 88.4282 3.2539 1.80518 25.42 9 35.2729 7.1969 1.53775 74.70 10 525.8297 DD[10] 11 937.0024 3.4880 1.49700 81.54 12 39.0050 DD[12] 13(St) 0.4407 14 46.9427 3.9251 1.78470 26.29 15 23.2143 6.6928 1.53775 74.70 16 133.1981 2.1155 17 90.2737 5.5514 1.92286 18.90 18 31.7692 8.1193 1.76182 26.52 19 19.9274 8.3507 20 23.1865 8.3507 1.68893 31.07 21 39.8334 12.6706 22 1.1134 1.51633 64.14 23 3.2942 24(Sim)
(54) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Example 3 Infinity Middle Closest 0.00 0.01 0.02 f 100.0 97.56 95.07 FNo. 1.90 1.90 1.90 2[] 10.8 10.6 10.2 DD[10] 1.12 2.90 4.77 DD[12] 12.27 10.49 8.62
Example 4
(55) The configuration diagram of the imaging lens of Example 4 is shown in
(56) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Example 4 Si Ri Di Ndj dj 1 75.7038 4.6287 1.48749 70.24 2 165.6445 0.5569 3 102.3409 6.7598 1.84666 23.78 4 1139.6874 0.3939 5 48.1118 10.2518 1.49700 81.54 6 206.4169 3.8979 1.95375 32.32 7 115.1095 2.1361 8 85.6576 3.1884 1.80518 25.42 9 35.7581 6.5044 1.53775 74.70 10 811.1627 DD[10] 11 800.9298 2.7840 1.49700 81.54 12 34.7658 DD[12] 13(St) 0.0556 14 49.8608 2.2329 1.78470 26.29 15 22.7573 6.7512 1.53775 74.70 16 104.9717 2.1159 17 93.1483 5.7744 1.92286 18.90 18 27.9290 7.3129 1.76182 26.52 19 450.2841 0.8896 20 2701.4944 6.3205 1.80518 25.42 21 20.9025 6.5929 22 22.7752 8.3257 1.62588 35.70 23 44.4258 12.6732 24 1.1136 1.51633 64.14 25 3.6881 26(Sim)
(57) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Example 4 Infinity Middle Closest 0.00 0.01 0.03 f 100.0 97.36 94.70 FNo. 1.90 1.90 1.90 2[] 11.0 10.6 10.2 DD[10] 1.05 2.59 4.19 DD[12] 12.71 11.17 9.57
Example 5
(58) The configuration diagram of the imaging lens of Example 5 is shown in
(59) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Example 5 Si Ri Di Ndj dj 1 383.0355 3.6110 1.48749 70.24 2 310.9583 0.0556 3 76.4886 6.7446 1.48749 70.24 4 499.1253 0.3930 5 58.9244 8.6694 1.49700 81.54 6 169.4609 2.7778 1.78800 47.37 7 98.3216 1.3340 8 50.7202 2.7833 1.78800 47.37 9 32.5176 8.3335 1.49700 81.54 10 1421.9893 DD[10] 11 190.1831 5.1870 1.92286 18.90 12 113.8834 4.4052 1.48749 70.24 13 31.9482 DD[13] 14(St) 0.7945 15 34.6333 2.2281 1.88300 40.76 16 25.8206 6.1211 1.59522 67.73 17 92.5123 2.1111 18 81.4665 8.1521 1.84666 23.88 19 122.5080 3.9411 1.74400 44.79 20 16.6545 8.3335 21 19.9100 7.8228 1.49700 81.54 22 38.0541 12.6446 23 1.1111 1.51633 64.14 24 3.3971 25(Sim)
(60) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Example 5 Infinity Middle Closest 0.00 0.02 0.03 f 100.00 97.29 94.55 FNo. 1.94 1.98 2.01 2[] 10.8 10.4 10.2 DD[10] 5.59 7.03 8.52 DD[13] 11.76 10.32 8.83
(61) Table 11 shows values corresponding to condition expressions (1) to (8) of the imaging lenses of Examples 1 to 5. The values shown in Table 11 are with respect to the d-line.
(62) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Example Example Example Example Example No. 1 2 3 4 5 (1) f2/f 0.55 0.58 0.75 0.67 0.61 (2) vn2 67.73 70.24 81.54 81.54 70.24 (3) f1/f3 0.79 0.68 0.51 0.52 0.57 (4) (R3r R3f)/ 0.35 0.31 0.26 0.32 0.31 (R3r + R3f) (5) f1/f 0.72 0.72 0.75 0.72 0.71 (6) f3/f 0.92 1.06 1.49 1.38 1.23 (7) f1/f2 1.30 1.25 1.00 1.08 1.17 (8) f3/f2 1.66 1.83 1.97 2.06 2.03
(63) As can be seen from the above-described data, each of the imaging lenses of Examples 1 to 5 has a compact configuration achieving size reduction in the optical axis direction and the radial direction, has a small F-number in the range from 1.9 to 2.0 in the state where the imaging lens is focused on an object at infinity, and achieves high optical performance for a wide range of object distance with low fluctuation of aberrations during focusing.
(64) Next, an imaging apparatus according to an embodiment of the disclosure is described.
(65) The imaging apparatus 10 includes the imaging lens 1, a filter 2 disposed on the image side of the imaging lens 1, and an image sensor 3 disposed on the image side of the filter 2. The imaging lens 1 includes a first lens group G1, a second lens group G2, and a third lens group G3. It should be noted that, in
(66) The imaging apparatus 10 also includes a signal processing unit 5 that processes the signal outputted from the image sensor 3, a display unit 6 on which an image formed by the signal processing unit 5 is displayed, and a focus control unit 8 that controls focusing of the imaging lens 1. It should be noted that, although one image sensor 3 is shown in
(67) The present disclosure has been described with reference to the embodiments and the examples. However, the disclosure is not limited to the above-described embodiments and examples, and various modifications may be made to the disclosure. For example, the values of the radius of curvature, the surface distance, the refractive index, the Abbe number, etc., of each lens are not limited to the values shown in the above-described examples, and may be different values.