Halide-based scintillator nanomaterial
09644141 ยท 2017-05-09
Assignee
Inventors
- Marek A. Osinski (Albuquerque, NM)
- Nathan J. Withers (Albuquerque, NM, US)
- Brian A. Akins (Edgewood, NM, US)
- GENNADY A. SMOLYAKOV (ALBUQUERQUE, NM, US)
- Krishnaprasad Sankar (Hillsboro, OR, US)
Cpc classification
Y10T428/2982
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y10T428/256
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
Abstract
A heterogeneous scintillator material is provided comprising core/shell nanoparticles having a highly hygroscopic or deliquescent halide-based core activated with trivalent Ln.sup.3+ or divalent Ln.sup.2+ lanthanide ions (Ln=La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu) and a stable non-hygroscopic shell thereon. The heterogeneous nanoparticles can comprise highly hygroscopic lanthanide halide (LaBr.sub.3, LuI.sub.3) cores protected with stable non-hygroscopic LaF.sub.3 shells. The heterogeneous nanoparticles can comprise deliquescent alkaline earth halide (SrI.sub.2, BaI.sub.2) cores protected with stable non-hygroscopic (SrF.sub.2, BaF.sub.2) shells.
Claims
1. A radiation detection method comprising exposing a heterogeneous scintillator material to ionizing radiation, wherein heterogeneous scintillator material comprises: one or more core/shell nanoparticles comprising: a highly hygroscopic or deliquescent halide-based core activated by inclusion of Ln ions, wherein Ln is one or more of La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu; and a stable non-hygroscopic inorganic shell on the core with a bandgap of the shell being higher than that of the core; and detecting scintillation from the heterogeneous scintillator material.
2. The radiation detection method of claim 1 wherein the core is activated with trivalent Ln.sup.3+ and/or divalent Ln.sup.2+ lanthanide ions.
3. The radiation detection method of claim 1 wherein the nanoparticle core has a particle dimension of 2 to 100 nm.
4. The radiation detection method of claim 1 wherein the core comprises a lanthanide halide nanoparticle or an alkaline earth halide nanoparticle activated with lanthanide ions.
5. The radiation detection method of claim 4 wherein the lanthanide halide nanoparticle is selected from the group consisting of LaBr.sub.3 and LuI.sub.3 activated with lanthanide ions.
6. The radiation detection method of claim 5 wherein the shell is LaF.sub.3.
7. The radiation detection method of claim 4 wherein the alkaline earth halide nanoparticle is selected from the group consisting of SrI.sub.2 and BaI.sub.2 doped with lanthanide ions.
8. The radiation detection method of claim 7 wherein the shell is SrF.sub.2 or BaF.sub.2.
9. The radiation detection method of claim 1 wherein the one or more core/shell nanoparticles are disposed in a matrix.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(14) The present invention provides in an embodiment lead-iodide-based scintillator materials that comprise lead (Pb) and iodine (I) and optionally present one or both of oxygen (O) and hydrogen (H), and that have different particles sizes depending on a method parameter employed to grow the particles in a colloidal solution. The scintillator materials thus may include or may not include oxygen and/or hydrogen.
(15) In one embodiment of the invention, the present invention provides a scintillator material that comprises nanoparticles [e.g. nanocrystals designated NC] comprising lead (Pb) and iodine (I) and optionally one or both of oxygen (O) and hydrogen (H). In a particular illustrative embodiment of the invention, the scintillator nanoparticles can comprise PbIOH wherein the Pb, I, O, and H are in generally equiatomic proportions or non-equiatomic variants thereof that exhibit scintillation under gamma irradiation. The scintillator nanoparticles have a particle dimension in the range of about 5 to about 100 nm. In another particular illustrative embodiment of the invention, the scintillator nanoparticles can comprise Pb.sub.3O.sub.2I.sub.2 that exhibit scintillation under gamma irradiation. The scintillator nanoparticles have a particle dimension in the range of about 5 to about 100 nm.
(16) In yet another embodiment of the present invention, microparticles (microcrystals) are provided comprising lead (Pb) and iodine (I) and optionally one or both of oxygen (O) and hydrogen (H) grown in a nanoparticle colloidal solution over time to a particle dimension greater than 0.1 m. The microparticles can comprise PbIOH wherein the Pb, I, O, and H are in generally equiatomic proportions or non-equiatomic variants thereof. The microparticles have a particle dimension in the range of about 0.1 to about 10 microns, such as about 2 microns, depending on the growth time in the nanoparticle colloidal solution. The microparticles may find use as a scintillator material as well.
EXAMPLE 1
A. Synthesis of Lead-Iodide-Based Nanocrystals and Microcrystals
(17) One synthesis procedure involves dissolution of bulk lead iodide in a coordinating solvent tetrahydrofuran (THF), subsequent re-crystallization with the addition of anhydrous methanol, and addition of dodecylamine (DDA) to obtain solvent-stabilized lead iodide NCs. The THF, anhydrous methanol, and DDA were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used directly. A synthesis procedure also is described in [Finlayson, 2006], which was used for synthesis of PbI.sub.2 NCs.
(18) In a typical procedure, 100 mg of high purity (99.999%) lead (II) iodide powder is initially dissolved in 15 mL of THF under continuous stirring at RT (room temperature) and under atmospheric pressure. The above conditions are important, since solubility is a strong function of temperature and pressure. Subsequently, the solution is sonicated in centrifuge tubes in order to obtain a saturated solution. Then, to remove any insoluble suspension still present, the saturated solution is centrifuged and the clear deep yellow supernatant is decanted out into a flask. Finally, while stirring this solution continuously under nitrogen atmosphere, 10 mL of anhydrous methanol is gradually added to the flask.
(19) Since lead iodide is only slightly soluble in methanol, a change in color is noticed. This change from deep yellow to colorless solution is interpreted as indication of the formation of nascent nanoparticles due to re-precipitation in the solution, although applicants do not wish or intend to be bound by ant theory in this regard. For this reason, the volumetric ratio of THF to methanol is very important in determining the growth kinetics and nature of the resulting nanoparticles. This process is allowed to continue for 24 hours under constant stirring in nitrogen atmosphere. After that, the process is quenched by addition of DDA at a ratio of 1 mg per 1 mL of the resulting nanoparticulate colloidal solution and the solution is stored in a vial at RT.
(20) It should be noted that although DDA was added with the intention to stop growth by capping the crystals, as recommended in [Finlayson 2006], it was found that this quenching procedure was inefficient, as synthesized NCs left in THF/methanol/DDA solvent kept growing over time, reaching a micrometer size greater than 1000 nanometers in about 3-month period.
B. Characterization of Lead-Iodide-Based Nanocrystals and Microcrystals
(21) B.1. Transmission Electron Microscopy and Corresponding Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy Analysis
(22) For structural characterization, TEM samples were prepared 9 days after synthesis by placing a drop of the colloidal solution in a 200-mesh carbon coated copper grid and the solvent was allowed to dry, fixing the NCs on the grid. High-resolution transmission electron microscope, JEOL-2010 operating at 200 kV, was used with the OXFORD Link ISIS energy dispersiven spectroscopy (EDS) apparatus.
(23) Bright field TEM images (
(24) As described below in Sections B.3 and B.4, studies of radiation hardness under gamma irradiation led to discovery of continuous increase in the light intensity of both control and irradiated samples. In order to better understand possible origin of that phenomenon, applicants have performed another TEM study, which revealed formation of much larger crystals, illustrated in
(25) B.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Corresponding Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy Analysis
(26)
(27) The SEM EDS analysis
(28) TABLE-US-00001 Elemental Analysis Table Element Line keV KRatio Wt % At % O K1 0.523 0.0212 4.23 31.53 Pb M1 2.346 0.4801 59.01 33.94 I L1 3.937 0.3164 36.76 34.53 Total 0.8177 100.00 100.00 Elemental analysis table showing percentage composition of elements of micro-scale lead-iodide-based crystals.
B.3. Photoluminescence and Absorption Spectroscopy
(29) The photoluminescence (PL) spectra were collected using a Horbia Jobin Yvon Fluorolog-3 spectrofluorometer. PL was measured for the colloidal nanocrystals solution as well as for the THF/methanol/DDA mixture of solvents. The absorption measurements were conducted using a CARY 400 UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The sample was prepared by adding drops of the NC solution to a three to two ratio mixture of THF and methanol. The same solvent mixture was used in the reference cells of the spectrophotometer.
(30) The absorption spectrum measured 2 days after synthesis (
(31) In the process of conducting regular PL measurements at weekly intervals, associated with the radiation hardness testing (see Section B.4), a steady increase in PL intensity from the NC solution was observed in both control and irradiated samples.
(32) B.4. Radiation Hardness Testing
(33) As no published data exist on the degradation effects of colloidal NCs exposed to gamma radiation, it is important to evaluate their radiation hardness. Applicants have used an Eberline 1000B multiple-source gamma calibrator to study the effects of irradiation on PL properties of lead-iodide-based NCs. A 39.7 curie .sup.137Cs source was used in the radiation hardness tests. .sup.137Cs is a monoenergetic 622 keV gamma ray source of a similar energy to the 511 keV gamma rays produced during positron annihilation.
(34) Optical degradation of the NCs was evaluated based on the measured dependence of their PL intensity on the irradiation dose. PL measurements were performed after weekly periods of irradiation to check if the NCs exhibited any signs of degradation in their optical characteristics. In order to exclude the effects of natural degradation, for example due to oxidative processes, on PL properties of the NCs, the applicants prepared two identical samples of the lead-iodide-based material and measured their PL spectra prior to irradiation experiments, thus establishing the base line for monitoring PL dynamics under irradiation. One of the samples was then to be irradiated, while the other one, a control sample, was to be stored under RT conditions and to be used for comparison purposes. Assuming that both irradiated and control samples undergo the same aging process and react to environmental changes in the same way, the applicants corrected the results of PL degradation measurement of irradiated sample for any changes in PL intensity of corresponding control sample with respect to its base line measurement.
(35) As described in Section B.3, surprisingly, the PL output of both the control and irradiated samples not only has not degraded with time, but it kept improving (see
(36) No significant loss of PL intensity was observed in the lead-iodide-based material due to the exposure to gamma irradiation. The lead-iodide-based NCs turned out to be practically radiation insensitive, maintaining luminescence after over 1630 krad of absorbed dose. This should be contrasted with CdSe/ZnS NCs, which lost luminescence rapidly (
(37) B.5. Quantum Efficiency and PL Lifetime Measurements
(38) According to the procedure established by Horiba Jobin Yvon [Porres 2006] and based on the method of deMello et al. [deMello 1997], quantum efficiency of the lead-iodide-based material was measured in a dilute solution of the sample using the integrating sphere capability on the Horiba Jobin Yvon Fluorolog-3 spectrofluorometer. As distinct from comparative methods of measuring quantum efficiency, integrating sphere approach allows for absolute measurement of quantum efficiency over a wide spectral range.
(39) Quantum efficiency for the blue photoluminescence of the lead-iodide-based material was measured at two different times after synthesis. Quantum efficiencies of 6.7% and 15.6% were recorded after 115 and 197 days after synthesis, respectively, which is consistent with the PL intensity increasing over time (
(40) The PL lifetime of NCs is expected to be shorter than that of bulk material, which would provide advantages in positron emission tomography. PL lifetime measurements for the lead-iodide-based material were taken on the same Horiba Jobin Yvon Fluorolog-3 spectrofluorometer in a different configuration, allowing for time-correlated single photon counting. Very short PL lifetimes of 4 ns and 4.2 ns were obtained from the measurements taken, respectively, 148 and 190 days after synthesis. In comparison with other inorganic high-speed scintillators (Table 1), the synthesized NCs possess the best combination of speed and efficiency. A decay time of 41 ns at RT was reported for LYSO scintillators, which is an order of magnitude longer than the room-temperature PL lifetime of 4 ns that was measured for the lead-iodide-based material.
(41) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 List of high-speed inorganic scintillators with their respective decay times and quantum efficiencies. YAlO.sub.3: Ce = 25 ns, 21,000 phot/MeV, QE ~7% LaBr.sub.3: Ce = 35 ns, 61,000 phot/MeV, QE ~21% LuAlO.sub.3: Ce = 18 ns, 12,000 phot/MeV, QE ~4% PbWO.sub.4 = 3 ns, 300 phot/MeV, QE ~0.09% ZnO (fast component) < 0.8 ns, < 860 phot/MeV, QE < 0.2%
B.6. Scintillation Experiments
(42) To test the lead-iodide-based material for scintillation, 0.14 Ci source of hydrated calcium uranyl phosphate, was used. This natural ore of uranium, known as autunite, with the chemical formula of Ca(UO.sub.2).sub.2(PO.sub.4).sub.2.10-12H.sub.2O [Locock 2003], provides a polyenergetic source of gamma rays from 100 keV to 1 MeV. Scintillation events were detected with a Hamamatsu R943-02 reflection-type GaAs photomultiplier tube (PMT) at a bias of 1,999 V, and the electronic signal from the PMT was processed using Ortec 113 preamplifier, Ortec 570 amplifier and pulse shaper, Ortec Illusion 25 multichannel analyzer. Data were analyzed using Ortec Maestro-32 for Windows software. The parameters of the Ortec 570 amplifier were: gain of 890 and a shaping time of 10 s. All measurements were taken over a live time of 100,000 s. Tests were conducted by placing the autunite source next to two standard 10 mm10 mm4.5 cm spectrosil cuvettes filled with the lead-iodide-based material, which were placed side-by-side in front of the photomultiplier tube. After closing the light blocking enclosure, the photomultiplier tube was left in the dark for a half an hour to reduce spurious counts due to exposure to non-signal light. Four tests were performed to rule out possible false positives due to light leaks, scintillation of the glass cuvette, and scintillation of the solvent.
(43) B.7. Mass Energy-Absorption Calculations and Comparison with LYSO
(44) One of the figures of merit for a scintillator is how efficiently the material absorbs gamma radiation. Neglecting non-absorptive scattering effects, a material or element can be characterized with the mass energy-transfer coefficient, .sub.tr/ expressed in units of cm.sup.2/g. This parameter is related to the portion of attenuated energy that is originally absorbed by the material as kinetic energy of electrons or re-emitted immediately as characteristic X-rays. The mass energy-absorption coefficient, .sub.en/ with units of [cm.sup.2/g] describes the amount of energy retained by the material. It is smaller than the energy-transfer coefficient due to energy loss from Brehmsstrahlung radiation from ionized electrons and is related to .sub.tr/ by the parameter g, where .sub.en/=(1g).sub.tr/. To calculate the amount of energy absorbed by a sheet of material, the formula I=I.sub.0exp{(.sub.en/)x} is used, where the original gamma flux is I.sub.0, the density of the material is , and the thickness of the material is x. Energy-transfer and energy-absorption tables for the elements and some common materials are available, but for an unknown material, the energy-absorption can be calculated from the elemental data as:
(45)
(46) The energy-transfer coefficient for a material can also be calculated from the elemental data [Attix 1986]:
(47)
(48) With the above information, we tabulated the values for .sub.en/, .sub.tr/, and for the thickness of material required to absorb half of the incident radiation at 511 keV for lead iodide, iodolaurionite, and LYSO of the same composition as used in the GEMINI TOF PET [Surti 2007] (Table 2).
(49) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 Calculated material constants for PbI.sub.2, PbIOH, and Lu.sub.1.8Y.sub.0.2SiO.sub.5 at 511 keV. .sub.tr/ .sub.en/ Density Half Value Material [cm.sup.2/g] [cm.sup.2/g] [g/cm.sup.3] Layer [cm] PbI.sub.2 0.11543 0.06100 6.16 1.8446 PbIOH 0.12336 0.06694 6.8 1.5227 Lu.sub.1.8Y.sub.0.2SiO.sub.5 0.11017 0.05592 7.1 1.7459
(50) The table above shows PbI.sub.2 has a higher mass energy-absorption coefficient than LYSO, but due to the material's lower density, lead iodide requires a larger thickness to absorb half of an incoming 511 keV gamma flux. PbIOH, on the other hand, has the largest mass energy-absorption coefficient of the three materials, and, with its higher density, has a smaller half value layer thickness than LYSO.
EXAMPLE 2
A. Second Synthesis of Lead-Iodide-Based Nanocrystals (PbIOH)
(51) The synthesis procedure for PbIOH nanocrystals was a modification of PbClOH synthesis reported by H. Zhang, M. Zuo, G. Li, S. Tan and S. Zhang, Laurionite nanowires and nanoribbons: rapid mechanochemical solution synthesis and optical properties, Nanotechnology 16, pp. 3115-3119 (2005).
(52) During a typical synthesis procedure, 0.461 g (1 mmol) of lead (II) iodide (PbI.sub.2) powder and 3 ml of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution were put into a mortar and ground with a pestle for 2 min at room temperature. The solution was collected and alternately centrifuged with deionized water, then centrifuged with ethanol, three times. The remaining yellowish samples were collected and stored in ethanol. An alternative method of synthesizing iodolaurionite was successfully accomplished by substituting potassium hydroxide (KOH) for the sodium hydroxide.
(53) High-resolution TEM analysis revealed nanocrystals 3-15 nm in diameter. XRD measurements confirmed that these nanocrystals comprised PbIOH (iodolaurionite).
EXAMPLE 3
A. Third Synthesis of Lead-Iodide-Based Nanocrystals (Pb3O2I2)
(54) The synthesis procedure for Pb.sub.3O.sub.2I.sub.2 nanocrystals was a modification of Pb.sub.3O.sub.2Cl.sub.2 synthesis reported by K. Lozano, C. Hernandez, T. W. Petty, M. B. Sigman, B. Korgel, Electrorheological analysis of nano laden suspensions, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 297, pp. 618-624 (2006).
(55) In this synthesis, 0.332 g of high purity (99.999%) lead (II) iodide (PbI.sub.2) powder was added to 32 ml of deionized water. 25 ml of chloroform (CHCl.sub.3) with 0.17 g sodium octanoate (NaOOC(CH.sub.2).sub.6CH.sub.3) were then added to the aqueous PbI2 solution forming two phasesan aqueous phase and a cloudy organic phase. The aqueous phase was then separated and discarded. 0.5 ml of ethylenediamine (C.sub.2H.sub.8N.sub.2) was added to the remaining organic solution. Evaporation of the organic solvent gave an opaque grayish-white solid, which served as the nanocrystal precursor. The precursor was heated in air for 60 min at 170 C. A dark grey solid was formed, and a yellowish solid. The nanocrystals were purified to remove unreacted byproducts by redispersing in chloroform with mild sonication followed by precipitation with ethanol. The precipitate was isolated by brief centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5 min. The purified nanocrystals appeared as a yellowish powder.
B. Characterization of Pb3O2I2 Nanocrystals
(56) The bright-field TEM image of Pb.sub.3O.sub.2I.sub.2 NCs is shown in
(57) In summary, the lead-iodide-based scintillator material pursuant to the invention can be used for time-of-flight PET. While providing optimal match between NC emission and spectral response of standard PMTs, it can offer higher speed and higher efficiency of optical emission for room temperature operation.
(58) The use of time-of-flight technology has improved the speed and resolution of standard PET technology through the use of high brightness, high-speed scintillation materials. As compared to bulk material, NCs provide faster luminescence decay times and increased brightness, features needed for TOF-PET. Lead-iodide-based nanocrystals pursuant to the invention show promise as a new scintillation material for this application. For example, the lead-iodide-based material was shown to be radiation resistant with relatively high quantum efficiency of 15.6%, and very short PL lifetime of 4 ns, an order of magnitude faster than the decay time of LYSO, a preferred scintillator for TOF-PET systems. According to applicants' calculations, the stopping power of the synthesized material is also superior to that of LYSO. Scintillation of the lead-iodide-based material was confirmed with the use of a poly-energetic gamma source.
(59) Heterogeneous Halide-Based Scintillator Material:
(60) The present invention provides in another embodiment a heterogeneous scintillator material that comprises core/shell nanoparticles comprising a highly hygroscopic or deliquescent halide-based core activated by inclusion of Ln ions therein where Ln is one or more of La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu, and a stable non-hygroscopic shell thereon, wherein the nanoparticles exhibit scintillation under gamma irradiation. An illustrative embodiment involves a heterogeneous scintillator material that comprises core/shell nanoparticles comprising a highly hygroscopic or deliquescent halide-based core activated with trivalent Ln.sup.3+ and/or divalent Ln.sup.2+ lanthanide ions (Ln=La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu) and a stable non-hygroscopic shell thereon, wherein the nanoparticles exhibit scintillation under gamma irradiation. In a further illustrative embodiment thereof, the nanoparticle core can have a particle dimension (e.g. diameter or other dimension) in the range of 2 nm to 100 nm.
(61) In another illustrative embodiment, the heterogeneous nanoparticle can comprise a highly hygroscopic lanthanide halide core activated by inclusion of lanthanide ions therein, and protected with a stable non-hygroscopic shell on the core.
(62) The lanthanide halide core can be selected from the group consisting of LaBr.sub.3 and LuI.sub.3 activated with one or more lanthanide ions such as Ce.sup.3+ in a concentration or amount sufficient (e.g. 10 atomic % Ce) to achieve desired scintillation when exposed to gamma irradiation. The shell can be LaF.sub.3 for lanthanide-activated (e.g. Ce-activated) scintillating LaBr.sub.3, and LuI.sub.3 cores. Lanthanide activated materials are represented herein by LaBr.sub.3:Ce, and LuI.sub.3:Ce for convenience wherein Ce is the activator in this example.
(63) In another illustrative embodiment, the heterogeneous nanoparticle can comprise a deliquescent alkaline earth halide core activated with lanthanide ions doped therein, and protected with stable non-hygroscopic shell on the core.
(64) The alkaline earth halide core can be selected from the group consisting of SrI.sub.2 and BaI.sub.2 doped with one or more lanthanide ions such as Eu.sup.2+; e.g. SrI.sub.2:Eu and BaI.sub.2:Eu. The lanthanide dopant is selected to be present in a concentration or amount sufficient (e.g. 0.5 mole % Eu) to achieve desired scintillation when exposed to gamma irradiation. The shell can be SrF.sub.2 and BaF.sub.2 for the alkaline earth iodide cores, SrI.sub.2 and BaI.sub.2.
EXAMPLE 4
A. Synthesis of Hygroscopic-Core/Stable-Shell LaBr3:Ce/LaF3 Nanocrystals
(65) In this synthesis, LaBr.sub.3:Ce core/undoped LaF.sub.3 shell colloidal nanocrystals were synthesized in anhydrous methanol using a procedure adapted from the synthesis of hydrophilic, stable LaF.sub.3:Ce colloidal nanocrystals [Wang 2007] by replacing fluorine precursor (ammonium fluoride) with bromine core precursor (ammonium bromide). The entire synthesis was performed under a controlled water-free atmosphere using an argon-filled glovebox and a Schlenk line apparatus connected to an argon line. See Z. Wang, J. Bo, S. Song, L. Hu, J. Liu, and X. Zhen, One-step synthesis of highly water-soluble LaF.sub.3:Ln.sup.3+ nanocrystals in methanol without using any ligands, Nanotechnology 18 (#46), 465-476 (2007) in the list of references below, which are incorporated herein by reference.
(66) Both core and shell precursors were prepared inside the glovebox. Lanthanum nitrate hexahydrate 99.99%, cerium nitrate hexahydrate 99.999%, ammonium bromide 99.9%, ammonium fluoride 99.9%, and anhydrous absolute methanol 99.9% were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Co. and used as such. A 0.65 M lanthanide (lanthanum+cerium) precursor solution for the core was prepared by dissolving 1.17 mmol (506.6 mg) of lanthanum nitrate hexahydrate and 0.13 mmol (56.45 mg) of cerium nitrate hexahydrate in 2 mL of anhydrous methanol. The bromine precursor solution for the core was prepared by dissolving 3 mmol of ammonium bromide in 35 mL of anhydrous methanol. The lanthanum precursor for the shell was prepared by dissolving 5.2 mmol (2.252 g) of lanthanum nitrate hexahydrate in 8 mL of anhydrous methanol and the fluorine precursor for the shell was prepared similarly by dissolving 12 mmol of ammonium fluoride (0.444 g) in 8 mL of anhydrous methanol.
(67) The three-neck flask containing the bromine core precursor in anhydrous methanol was taken out from the glovebox, connected to the Schlenk line, and heated to 60 C. at the rate of 5 C./min. After the temperature reached 60 C., the lanthanide (lanthanum+cerium) core precursor was injected rapidly into the flask. The solution was allowed to stir at 600 rpm for 10 minutes under argon atmosphere. Then, alternate drop wise injections of lanthanum and fluorine shell precursors were done at the rate of 5 drops/min. The solution in the flask was subsequently allowed to stir at 1000 rpm for 2 hours under argon atmosphere. After 2 hours, the solution was purified and precipitated by centrifugation at 5000 rpm using methanol, and dispersed in DI water. It was observed that the cerium-doped lanthanum bromide/undoped lanthanum fluoride core/shell nanocrystals were highly dispersible in water due to the hydrophilic hydroxyl groups attached to lanthanum fluoride shell, and were also very stable without any signs of aggregation or flocculation. The nanocrystals were hexagonal platelets 10-20 nm wide and 5-10 nm thick.
(68) Composite Scintillator Materials:
(69) In a further embodiment of the invention, the nanoparticles and/or microparticles described above and in Examples 1-4 are disposed in a suitable matrix, which can be a solid, gel, porous, or liquid matrix, to provide a composite scintillator. The matrix can include, but is not limited to, a polymer matrix, glass or ceramic matrix, aerogel matrix, optical fiber matrix, liquid matrix, and others. The nanoparticles and/or microparticles can be incorporated into the matrix using various methods appropriate to the matrix material and include, but are not limited to, mixing the nanoparticles or microparticles into a liquid or melted matrix material and solidifying the matrix material; heating and vacuum consolidating a dispersion of nanoparticles and matrix particles such as polymer or glass particles; sol-gel processing; and others.
(70) Although the invention has been described with respect to certain embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will understand that changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
REFERENCES
(71) [Amand 1992] T. Amand, X. Marie, B. Dareys, J. Barrau, M. Brousseau, D. J. Dunstan, J. Y. Emery, and L. Goldstein, Well-width dependence of the excitonic lifetime in strained III-V quantum-wells, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 72 (#5), pp. 2077-2079 (1992). [Artemyev 1997] M. V. Artemyev, Y. P. Rakovich, and G. P. Yablonski, Effect of dc electric field on photoluminescence from quantum-confined PbI.sub.2 nanocrystals, J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 171 (#3-4), pp. 447-452 (1997). [Attix 1986] F. Attix, Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York 1986, pp. 155-156 and p. 187. [Bangerter 1998] M. Bangerter, F. Moog, I. Buchmann, J. Kotzerke, M. Greisshammer, M. Hafnerm, K. Klsner, N. Frickhofen, S. N. Reske, and L. Bergmann, Whole-body 2-[.sup.18F]-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for accurate staging of Hodgkins's disease, Ann. Oncol., vol. 9, pp. 1117-1122 (1998). [Chand 1975] M. Chand, and G. C. Trigunayat, Atomic structures of three new rhombohedral polytypes of lead iodide, Acta Cryst, vol. B31, pp. 1222-1223 (1975). [Chen 2006] W. Chen and J. Zhang, Using nanoparticles to enable simultaneous radiation and photodynamic therapies for cancer treatment, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., vol. 6 (#4), pp. 1159-1166, April 2006. [Cherepy 2008] N. J. Cherepy, G. Hull, A. D. Drobshoff, S. A. Payne, E. Van Loef, C. M. Wilson, K. S. Shah, U. N. Roy, A. Burger, L. A. Boatner, W.-S. Choong, W. W. Moses, Strontium and barium iodide high light yield scintillators, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 92(#8), 083508 (2008). [Chuang 1998] S.-L. Chuang, N. Nakayama, A. Ishibashi, S. Taniguchi, and K. Nakano, Degradation of II-VI blue-green semiconductor lasers, IEEE J Quantum Electron., vol. 34 (#5), pp. 851-857, May 1998. [Dai 2002] S. Dai, S. Saengkerdsub, H.-J. Im, A. C. Stephan, and S. M. Mahurin, Nanocrystal-based scintillators for radiation detection, Unattended Radiation Sensor Systems for Remote Applications, 15-17 Apr. 2002, Washington, D.C., AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 632, pp. 220-224 (2002). [deMello 1997] J. C. deMello, H. F. Wittmann, and R. H. Friend, Improved experimental determination of external photoluminescence quantum efficiency, Adv. Mater., vol. 9 (#3), p. 230 (1997). [Derenzo 2002] S. E. Derenzo, M. J. Weber, and M. K. Klintenberg, Temperature dependence of the fast, near-band-edge scintillation from CuI, HgI.sub.2, PbI.sub.2, ZnO:Ga and CdS:In, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. AAccel. Spectrom. Dect. Assoc. Equip., vol. 486 (#1-2), pp. 214-219 (2002). [Derenzo 2005] S. E. Derenzo, Who needs better nuclear detector materials and how do we find them? Interdisciplinary Instrumentation Colloquium. Berkeley: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2005). [Finlayson 2006] C. E. Finlayson and P. J. A. Sazio, Highly efficient blue photoluminescence from colloidal lead-iodide nanoparticles, J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys., vol. 39 (#8), pp. 1477-1480 (2006). [Kalk 1998] A. Kalk and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press, New York 1988, p. 144. [Klintenberg 2002] M. Klintenberg, S. E. Derenzo, and M. J. Weber, Potential scintillators identified by electronic structure calculations, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. AAccel. Spectrom. Dect. Assoc. Equip., vol. 486 (#1-2), pp. 298-302 (2002). [Klintenberg 2003] M. K. Klintenberg, M. J. Weber, and D. E. Derenzo, Luminescence and scintillation of PbI.sub.2 and HgI.sub.2, J. Lumines., vol. 102, pp. 287-290 (2003). [Knoll 2000] G. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York 2000, pp. 12-13. [Kramer 2006] K. W. Kramer, P. Dorenbos, H. U. Gudel, C. W. E. van Eijk, Development and characterization of highly efficient new cerium doped rare earth halide scintillator materials, J. Mater. Chem., vol. 16 (#27), pp. 2773-2780 (2006). [Ltant 2006a] S. E. Ltant and T.-F. Wang, Study of porous glass doped with quantum dots or laser dyes under alpha irradiation, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 88 (#10), Art. 103110, 8 Mar. 2006. [Ltant 2006b] S. E. Ltant and T. F. Wang, Semiconductor quantum dot scintillation under -ray irradiation, Nano Lett., vol. 6 (#12), pp. 2877-2880, 13 Dec. 2006. [Locock 2003] A. Locock and P. Burns, The crystal structure of synthetic autunite, Ca[(UO.sub.2)(PO.sub.4)].sub.2 (H.sub.2O).sub.11, Am. Mineral., vol. 88, pp. 240-244 (2003). [Matsunari 2007] I. Matsunari, M. Samuraki, W.-P. Chen, D. Yanase, N. Takeda, K: Ono, M. Yoshita, H. Matsuda, M. Yamada, and S. Kinuya, Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and optimized voxel-based morphometry for detection of Alzheimer's disease: Aging effect on diagnostic performance, J. Nucl. Med., vol. 48, pp. 1961-1970 (2007). [McKigney 2007] E. A. McKigney, R. E. Del Sesto, L. G. Jacobsohn, P. A. Santi, R. E. Muenchausen, K. C. Ott, T. M. McCleskey, B. L. Bennett, J. F. Smith, and D. W. Cooke, Nanocomposite scintillators for radiation detection and nuclear spectroscopy, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A, vol. 579 (#1), pp. 15-18, 21 Aug. 2007. [Mutlugun 2007] E. Mutlugun, I. M. Soganci, and H. V. Demir, Nanocrystal hybridized scintillators for enhanced detection and imaging on Si platforms in UV, Opt. Express, vol. 15 (#3), pp. 1128-1134, 5 Feb. 2007. [Muzic 2006] R. Muzic and J. Kolthammer, PET performance of the GEMINI TF: a time-of-flight PET/CT scanner, IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. M06-152, vol. 3, pp. 1940-1944 (2006). [O'Brien 2001] T. O'Brien, R. Hicks, R. Ware, D. Binns, M. Murphy, and J. Cook, The Utility of a 3-dimensional, large-field-of-view, sodium iodide crystal-based PET scanner in the presurgical evaluation of partial epilepsy, J. Nucl. Med., vol. 42, pp. 1158-1165 (2001). [Papavassiliou 1997] G. C. Papavassiliou, Three- and low-dimensional inorganic semiconductors, Prog. Solid State Chem., vol. 25 (#3-4), pp. 125-270 (1997). [Pidol 2004] L. Pidol, B. Khan-harari, B. Ciana, E. Virey, B. Ferrand, P. Dorenbos, J. T. M. de Haas, and C. W. E. van Eijk, High efficiency of lutetium silicate scintillators, Ce-doped LPS, and LYSO crystals, IEEE Trans. Nuc. Sci., vol. 51 (#3), pp. 1084-1087 (2004). [Porres 2006] L. Porres, A. Holland, L. O. Palsson, A. P. Monkman, C. Kemp, and A. Beeby, Absolute measurements of photoluminescence quantum yields of solutions using an integrating sphere, J. Fluoresc., vol. 16 (#2), pp. 267-272 (2006). [Surti 2007] S. Surti, A. Kuhn, M. Werner, A. Perkins, J. Kolthammer, and J. Karp, Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special considerations for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities, J. Nucl. Med., vol. 48 (#3), pp. 471-480 (2007). [van Loef 2001] E. V. D. van Loef, P. Dorenbos, C. W. E. van Eijk, K. Kramer, and H. U. Gudel, High-energy-resolution scintillator: Ce.sup.3+ activated LaBr.sub.3, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 79(#10), pp. 1573-1575 (2001). [Wang 2007] Z. Wang, J. Bo, S. Song, L. Hu, J. Liu, and X. Zhen, One-step synthesis of highly water-soluble LaF.sub.3:Ln.sup.3+ nanocrystals in methanol without using any ligands, Nanotechnology 18 (#46), 465-476 (2007). [Weber 2002] M. J. Weber, Inorganic scintillators: Today and tomorrow, J. Lumines., vol. 100(#1-4), pp. 35-45 (2002). [Wong 1983] W.-H. Wong, A. Mullani, E. Phillippe, R. Hartz, and K. Gould, Image improvements and design optimization of the time-of-flight PET, J. Nucl. Med., vol. 24, pp. 52-60 (1983). [Xu 1993] Z. Y. Xu, S. R. Jin, C. P. Luo, and J. Z. Xu, Well width dependence of the exciton lifetime in narrow GaAs/GaAlAs quantum-wells, Solid State Commun., vol. 87 (#9), pp. 797-800 (1993).