Heavy metal stabilization and methane inhibition during induced or naturally occurring reducing conditions in contaminated media
09637731 ยท 2017-05-02
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
Y02E50/30
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C02F2305/06
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C02F9/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B09C1/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A method for inhibiting methane production in naturally occurring or induced reducing conditions, thus subsequently resulting into inhibition of the biomethylation process of the heavy metals is disclosed. The disclosed inhibiting composition blocks 3-hydroxy-3-ethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, and 8-hydroxy-5-deazaflavin (coenzyme F.sub.420) in the methane production pathway, due to the presence of lovastatin in the red yeast rice. As a result the methanogens are unable to produce enough quantities of methane that will result to the production of methylmetal(loids), which are usually volatile and more toxic than their inorganic counterparts due to increased water solubility and hydrophobicity.
Claims
1. A method for inhibiting methane production under induced or naturally occurring reducing conditions in a contaminated media, the method comprising contacting the contaminated media with a composition comprising red yeast rice, wherein an amount of the composition is sufficient to cause inhibition of methane production of methanogens within the contaminated media by blocking 8-hydroxy-5-deazaflavin (coenzyme F420) in a methane production pathway, and wherein the inhibition of the methane production results in constrainment of a biomethylation process of heavy metals within the contaminated media.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the contaminated media is an environmental medium.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the environmental medium is soil or groundwater.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the heavy metals that are subject to the constrainment of the biomethylation process include heavy metals from Groups IV, V and VI in the periodic table.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the heavy metals that are subject to the constrainment of the biomethylation process include transition metals from Groups IB, IIB, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB and VIIB in the periodic table.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition is further to inhibit the methane production of the methanogens within the contaminated media by blocking 3 hydroxy-3-ethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase in the methane production pathway.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition includes a naturally-occurring statin.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the naturally-occurring statin is lovastatin.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the red yeast rice provides the lovastatin.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the inhibition of methane production results in inhibition of methylmetal(loid) production that is part of the biomethylation process of the heavy metals.
11. A method for constraining biomethylation of heavy metals within a contaminated media, the method comprising contacting the contaminated media with a composition comprising red yeast rice to inhibit methane production of methanogens within the contaminated media by blocking 8-hydroxy-5-deazaflavin (coenzyme F420) in a methane production pathway, wherein methane within the contaminated media leads to the biomethylation of the heavy metals so inhibiting the methane production constrains the biomethylation.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the contaminated media is soil or groundwater.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein the heavy metals include Group IV, V and VI metals from the periodic table.
14. The method of claim 11, wherein the heavy metals include transition metals from Groups IB, IIB, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB and VIIB in the periodic table.
15. The method of claim 11, wherein the composition is further to inhibit the methane production of the methanogens within the contaminated media by blocking 3-hydroxy-3-ethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase in the methane production pathway.
16. The method of claim 11, wherein the red yeast rice provides a naturally-occurring statin.
17. The method of claim 11, wherein the red yeast rice provides a lovastatin.
18. The method of claim 11, wherein the inhibition of the methane production of the methanogens inhibits methylmetal(loid) production that is part of the biomethylation process of the heavy metals.
19. A method for inhibiting production of methylmetal(loids) from heavy metals within a contaminated media, the method comprising providing a composition including red yeast rice to the contaminated media in order to inhibit methane production of methanogens within the contaminated media by blocking 8-hydroxy-5-deazaflavin (coenzyme F420) in a methane production pathway, wherein methane and the heavy metals within the contaminated media interact to produce the methylmetal(loids), and wherein the inhibiting of the methane production of the methanogens within the contaminated media inhibits the methylmetal(loids) production.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the contaminated media is soil or groundwater.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(7) Biological methanogenesis widely occurs in natural environments including soils, water, deep sea and digestive systems of some animals and plays an important role in global carbon cycling. Methane producing microorganisms, mainly methanogenic Archaea, which obtain energy for growth by converting a limited number of substrates to methane, are common in anaerobic environments where organic matter undergoes decomposition. The main precursor for methane production by methanogens is often acetate, which is one of the most abundant products from anaerobic digestion of organic matter via bacterial catabolism. Two mechanisms for methane generation from acetate by methanogens have been known, such as an aceticlastic reaction and a two-step process in which acetate is first oxidized to H.sub.2 and CO.sub.2, followed by their subsequent conversion to methane by methanogens. In the latter process, although some methanogens, such as Methanosarcinaceae, are capable of independently oxidizing acetate by themselves, various syntrophic bacteria are also involved in multistep processes such as acetogenic fermentation, syntrophic acetate oxidation, and hydrogenotrophic methane production.
(8) The methanogenic Archaea (methanogens) occupy a variety of anaerobic habitats, where they play a role in the conversion of hydrogen and other intermediates to methane. The hydrogenotrophic methanogens use hydrogen to reduce CO.sub.2 to methane. In addition, some hydrogenotrophs use formate, and a few substitute certain low-molecular-weight alcohols for hydrogen.
(9) The deazaflavin F.sub.420 is a common coenzyme of methanogenesis. The reduction of CO.sub.2 to methane commonly includes reduced F.sub.420 (F.sub.420H.sub.2), since it is the sole electron donor for the step that reduces methylenetetrahydromethanopterin (methylene-H.sub.4MPT). In addition, F.sub.420H.sub.2 is the electron donor for F.sub.420H.sub.2-dependent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin dehydrogenase (Mtd), one of two enzymes that reduce methenyl-H4MPT. The other enzyme, H.sub.2-dependent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin dehydrogenase (Hmd), uses H.sub.2 directly. mRNA abundance for Mtd increased markedly under hydrogen-limited growth conditions, suggesting that Mtd may be useful when H.sub.2 is limiting.
(10) The F.sub.420-reducing hydrogenases (Fru and Frc) reduce F.sub.420 with H.sub.2. However, an alternative route for this process has been proposed. In Methanothermobacter marburgensis the specific activity of F.sub.420-reducing hydrogenase, a NiFe hydrogenase, decreased 20-fold under nickel-limited growth conditions. In contrast, the specific activities of Hmd and Mtd, neither of which requires nickel for activity, increased six- and fourfold, respectively. These observations led to the proposal that under nickel-limited conditions, F.sub.420 may be reduced by the concerted action of Hmd and Mtd, the former working in the forward direction (with respect to the methanogenic pathway) and the latter in the reverse direction. This pathway is presented in
(11) Sharma et al. (2011) determined a 3D model structure of the F.sub.420-dependent NADP oxidoreductase enzyme from M. smithii. Based on their protein model, they detected that these residues are making a ligand binding site pocket, and they found that ligand F.sub.420 binds at the protein cavity. The inhibitor compounds lovastatin and compactin (mevastatin) show more affinity for the model protein as compare to the natural ligand F.sub.420. They share the same cavity as by F.sub.420 and surround by similar residues. Therefore, the inhibitor compounds lovastatin and compactin (mevastatin) were very effective in blocking the activity site for methane production since the enzyme was unable to bind with the substrate, resulting in decreased methane production.
(12) The acetyl coenzyme A (CoA) pathway commonly referred to as the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway or the reductive acetyl-CoA pathway is one of the major metabolic pathways utilized by methanogenic bacteria. This specific pathway is characterized by the use of hydrogen as an electron donor and carbon dioxide as an electron acceptor to produce acetyl-CoA as the final product. The acetyl-CoA pathway begins with the reduction of a carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide. The other carbon dioxide is reduced to a carbonyl group. The two major enzymes involved in these processes are carbon monoxide dehydrogenase and acetyl CoA synthase complex. The carbon dioxide that is reduced to a carbonyl group, via the carbon monoxide dehydrogenase, is combined with the methyl group to form acetyl-CoA. The acetyl-CoA synthase complex is responsible for this reaction. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, is an important enzyme in methane production in Methanobrevibactor strains, since Archaea are bacteria known to possess biosynthetic HMG-CoA reductase.
(13) Lovastatin is a secondary product of idiophase (secondary phase) of growth of fungi and is an inhibitor of enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-ethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, a key enzyme also in cholesterol production pathway in humans. There is a similarity between cholesterol formation in human and cell membrane formation in the Archaea (methanogens) as the lipid side of phospholipids in the cell membrane of Archaea isoprenoid chains. Isoprenoid formation is an intermediate step of cholesterol production pathway (Mevalonate pathway) and HMG-CoA reductase is also a key enzyme for its production. Therefore, as an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, lovastatin suppresses isoprenoid production and thus cholesterol synthesis and methane formation in the Archaea.
(14) Wolin and Miller (2005) showed that lovastatin significantly reduced growth and activity of pure methanogenic bacteria without any negative effect on cellulolytic bacteria. Further studies have shown that red yeast rice can successfully inhibit the key enzyme HMG-CoA reductase, resulting in the inhibition of methanogenic activity. Miller and Wolin (2001) also used Lovastatin to inhibit the formation of the key precursor mevalonate. Mevalonate is formed by reduction of HMG-CoA. Based on their results they found that lovastatin inhibited the growth of Methanobrevibacter and subsequently the methane production. In fact 4 nmol/ml of culture medium resulted in 50% inhibition of growth and concentrations 10 nmol/ml of culture medium completely inhibited growth. Methane formation was also significantly inhibited. At the same time the populations of the non-methanogens were not affected.
(15) The use of red yeast rice under naturally existing or technically induced reducing anaerobic conditions inhibits the biomethylation of heavy metals by methanogens. As a result, the established reaction mechanisms for immobilization of various heavy metals under reducing conditions will be more effectively undertaken (Table 2). Moreover, the overall toxicity of the site is not increased via the generation of methylmetal(loids) as a consequence of the treatment process.
(16) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Overview of Heavy Metal Immobilization Reactions during Anaerobic Conditions Dissolved Metal STABILIZATION / IMMOBILIZATION MECHANISMS REFERENCE As (III, V) Reductive precipitation with oxidized iron minerals. Precipitation as Blowes et al, 2000; As sulfide and mixed FeAs sulfide. Manning et al., 2002; Craw et al., 2003 Cr(VI), Mo(VI), Reductive precipitation with oxidized iron minerals adsorption to Blowes et al., 2000;, 8 Se(IV, VI), iron oxides. U(VI) Me.sup.2+ (Cu, Zn, Organic carbon source stimulates heterotrophic microbial sulfate Blowes et al., 2000; Pb, Cd, Ni) reduction to sulfide and metal cations precipitate as sulfides. Also Dzombak and strong adsorption to iron corrosion products (e.g. iron oxides and Morel, 1990 oxyhydroxides). Hg.sup.2+ Mercury is commonly converted by microorganisms to monomethyl Blowes et al., 2000; mercury (CH.sub.3Hg) and dimethyl mercury [(CH.sub.3).sub.2Hg)]. If not Dzombak and organically complexed, mercury can reductively precipitate as Morel, 1990 mercury sulfide. Also strong adsorption to iron corrosion products (e.g.; iron oxides and oxyhydroxides).
(17) For example, metal cations such as Cu, Zn, Hg, Pb, Cd, and Ni will precipitate as metal sulfides following microbial mediated reduction of sulfate present in the groundwater. The presence of sulfate in the subsurface as well as the additional introduction of sulfate as a remedial substance along with the biodegradation of carbon sources will stimulate the sulfate-reducing bacteria and the process could be represented by the following equations:
2CH.sub.2O.sub.(s)+SO.sub.4.sup.2+2H.sup.+.sub.(aq).fwdarw.H.sub.2S+2CO.sub.2(aq)+H.sub.2O
Me.sup.2+.sub.(aq)+H.sub.2S.sub.(aq).fwdarw.MeS.sub.(s)+2H.sup.+.sub.(aq)
where CH.sub.2O represents organic carbon and Me.sup.2+ represents a divalent metal cation.
EXAMPLES
(18) Two bench scale studies were performed to test the effectiveness of the methane inhibitor red yeast rice (RYR).
(19) Purpose
(20) The purpose of the two laboratory studies was to evaluate the effectiveness of Methane Inhibitor Red Yeast Rice (MIRYR), a composition developed by the inventors herein. The product was designed to inhibit methane production in environments where methanogens are established and active.
(21) Materials and Methods
(22) Laboratory Study 1
(23) Two anaerobic reactors were utilized, a Control and a Test reactor. The two reactors were seeded with biomass treating expired dietary supplement, which contained an active methanogenic population. The reactors were fed once per week, and were operated as anaerobic sequencing batch reactors.
(24) During the first week of startup, the reactors contained only the methanogenic culture, without soil. After one week, silty sand was added, resulting in a slurry having a solids concentration of 20% by weight. The reactors were operated for another week with the silty sand, to ensure that the sand did not affect methanogenic activity. The bioreactors were 2.5 L in volume, containing 2 L of slurry. The reactors were airtight and were especially designed for anaerobic reactions. The reactors were maintained at laboratory temperature 22 C.-24 C. The reactors were operated by feeding with dietary supplement once a week. The target initial chemical oxidation demand (COD) concentration after feeding was 2000 mg/L. Throughout the week, the volume of biogas produced was measured as follows. A syringe was inserted periodically into a septum-filled port in the top of the reactor to collect a gas sample for methane content. The methane content of the biogas samples was then quantified by injecting into a gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID). The reactors had dedicated probes to measure pH and oxidation reduction potential (ORP). After each cycle (i.e., before feeding), a probe was inserted into the reactor to measure total dissolved solids (TDS), and a sample was collected to measure COD. The mixer was turned off during sampling and feeding to minimize the introduction of oxygen into the reactor contents.
(25) The Test reactor was initially dosed with a 40 g/L concentration of Methane Inhibitor RYR (MIRYR). One week later the Control was dosed with 20 mg/L MIRYR.
(26) Laboratory Study 2
(27) Two test aliquots were prepared under a nitrogen atmosphere in a glove box as follows:
(28) 1. A 240 mL amber glass screw-cap septum bottle was filled with 100 g of dry soil (70 mL).
(29) 2. Deoxygenated deionized water was slowly added to the soil to saturate the soil; an additional 40 mL of water was then added to the soil.
(30) 3. Manure slurry was added to yield a 1 weight percent manure dose to the soil.
(31) Once the bottle was sealed it was removed from the glove box. The soil was kept in the dark (by wrapping with foil) at room temperature (22 C.). A needle connected to a polyethylene tube was pushed through the bottle septum and the tube outlet was placed in an inverted graduated cylinder in a water bath. The gas generation rate was recorded as the water was displaced over a period of 10 days.
(32) The methane reduction trial included two sample formulations, with and without MIRYR, for a total of 4 samples. The bottles were sampled 0.5, 1.5, 5, 12, and 19 days following the sample preparation.
(33) Results
(34) Laboratory Study 1
(35) The first two weeks of the studies were the Startup Period, and the second two weeks were the Test Period. The Startup Period established the methanogenic population in the two reactors. During the first week of startup, the reactors were operated without the silty sand, and the second week they were operated with the silty sand (20% by weight). The Test Period started with the dosing of the Test reactor with MIRYR (40 g/L). During the first week of the Test Period the Control was maintained as a proper control, with no MIRYR added. Because the 40 mg/L dose of MIRYR reduced methane production in the Test reactor, it was decided to dose the Control reactor with 20 g/L of MIRYR during the second week of the Test Period. The Test Period lasted 17 days.
(36) Table 3 lists the volume of biogas production, pH values, and the concentrations of COD, ORP, and TDS measured in the Control and Test reactors during the studies. The volume of biogas produced each feed cycle (i.e., each week) in the reactors ranged between 72-82 mL. It is notable that the volume of gas was not affected by the introduction of silty sand during week 2 of the Startup period. The addition of 40 mg/L of MIRYR to the test in the first week of the Test period and the addition of 20 mg/L of MIRYR during the second week of the Test period did not appreciably impact biogas volume in the reactors. The COD measurements after each sequencing batch reactor cycle ranged from 56 to 108 mg/L. The reactors were fed 2000 mg/L each cycle, so the COD concentrations in Table 3 demonstrate that the COD was consumed by the anaerobic culture. Values of pH ranged between 6.1 and 6.4. Values of ORP were all close to 300 mV, which is typical of methanogenic conditions. The TDS in the reactors ranged from approximately 1200 to 1250 mg/L.
(37) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 A list of the biogas volume, pH values, and concentrations of COD, ORP, and TDS in the Control and the Test reactors throughout the studies. Gas Vol. COD ORP TDS Period (mL) (mg/L) pH (mV) (mg/L) CONTROL Startup-Week 1 81 56 6.4 302 1213 Startup-Week 2 72 91 6.3 306 1241 Test- Week 1 75 61 6.2 289 1258 Test- Week 2 73 108 6.3 296 1220 TEST Startup-Week 1 79 72 6.2 285 1244 Startup-Week 2 75 83 6.2 298 1265 Test- Week 1 82 62 6.1 306 1263 Test- Week 2 72 97 6.4 287 1247
(38) Table 4 lists the methane content measured in the biogas generated in the reactors during the 17-day study period.
(39) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 A list of the methane concentrations (%) measured in the biogas during the Test Period (i.e., after dosing with methane inhibitor). Activity Time (days) Control (%) Test (%) dosed Test 0 57 62 (40 mg/L) 2 61 47 4 68 32 6 59 20 dosed Control 7 65 13 (20 mg/L) 9 51 6 11 31 0 13 22 0 15 8 0 17 0 0
(40) It is understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments and examples, but is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
(41) Laboratory Study 2
(42) Table 4 lists the methane content measured in the biogas generated in the reactors during the 19-day study period. The first soil formulation (SF1) that contains 20% of the MIRYR (approximately 40 mg/L in solution) showed great effectiveness in inhibiting the methane production by 96% during the 19-day sampling interval. Similarly at the same time frame the second soil formulation (SF2) resulted into a 25% decrease in methane production.
(43) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 A list of the methane concentrations (%) measured in the biogas of the seven sample formulations during the Test Period. SF1 (no SF1 (with SF2 (no SF2 (with Time (days) MIRYR) 20% MIRYR) MIRYR) 10% MIRYR) 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.5 1.0 2.0 7.0 8.0 5 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 12 1.39 0.79 0.94 0.86 19 3,217 140 2,685 2,023 SF: Sample Formulation
(44) The above examples show that the disclosed embodiment is able to reduce methane and therefore results in the constrainment of a biomethylation process of heavy metals present in a contaminated media. A person skilled in the art will be able to perform simple testing using the disclosed embodiments to determine an effective amount for reducing methane constraining the biomethylation process for specific metals, such as groups IV, V and VI in the periodic table, as well as groups IB, IIB, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIB and VIIB in the periodic table. Further, a person skilled in the art will be able to determine an effective amount for use in an environmental medium, including soil or groundwater.
(45) Once again, it is understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments and examples, but is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.