Method for aligning high aspect ratio materials and compositions therefrom
09637612 ยท 2017-05-02
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01J35/33
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C08L63/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B82Y40/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C08L67/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J37/342
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C08L67/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08L63/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y10T428/249942
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
Abstract
A method for alignment of high aspect ratio materials (HARMs) within a liquid matrix by means of magnetic particles. The application of an external magnetic field creates a forced motion of the magnetic particles. This in turn leads to a laminar flow within the matrix which imposes a drag force on the HARMs, aligning the HARMs across the matrix. The used magnetic particles eventually accumulate at one end side of the matrix container and can be removed either by an incision or an extraction process. Unlike the previously proposed methods, there is no need for the magnetic particles to be attached either physically or chemically to the HARMs. Thus, the ultimate aligned HARMs are mostly pure and free of any magnetic particles. Once the matrix is a polymeric solution, the mentioned method is capable of synthesis of aligned HARMs-polymer composites, which exhibit improved mechanical and electrical properties.
Claims
1. A method for alignment of high aspect ratio materials (HARMs) comprising: creating a matrix material comprising HARMs and a plurality of magnetic particles admixed therein; and aligning said HARMs parallel to a direction, wherein the aligning step includes causing said plurality of magnetic particles to traverse through the HARMs in said direction and gather at one side of a container for said matric material, by applying a magnetic field to said one side of the container for said matrix material, the magnetic field being aligned parallel to said direction, and said magnetic field drawing said magnetic particles through said HARMs to said one side of said container wherein said HARMs comprise one or more of nanotubes, nanofibers, nanorods, or nanowires, and wherein said method further comprises removing said plurality of magnetic particles from said one side of said container.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of magnetic particles are selected from a group consisting of magnetic, paramagnetic, ferrimagnetic, ferromagnetic, diamagnetic and superparamagnetic particles, and combinations thereof.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of magnetic particles comprises a material selected from a group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt, and alloys thereof.
4. The method according to claim 1 wherein said matrix material comprises a polymeric material with said plurality of magnetic particles dispersed therethrough.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the strength of the applied magnetic field is less than one Tesla.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the strength of the applied magnetic field is in the range about 0.1 to about 1.0 Tesla.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the strength of the applied magnetic field is in the range about 0.1 to about 0.5 Tesla.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic field is formed using at least one magnet.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein said at least one magnet and said magnetic field are fixed relative to said matrix material.
10. The method according to claim 8, wherein said at least one magnet is mobile and wherein applying the magnetic field comprises passing the least one magnet over said matrix material a plurality of times.
11. The method according to claim 8, wherein the magnetic field is formed using at least two magnets.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic field is formed using at least one solenoid.
13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the HARMs remaining after said removing are essentially free of said magnetic particles.
14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the removing of said plurality of magnetic particles from said one side of said container includes making an incision, and wherein a portion of said matrix material at said one end of said container is removed by cutting, said portion containing essentially all of said magnetic particles.
15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the removing said plurality of magnetic particles from said one side of said container includes an extraction, and wherein the method further comprises: applying another magnet to said matrix material at said one end of said container, to pull said magnetic particles out, and wherein said another magnet extracts essentially all of said magnetic particles.
16. The method according to claim 15, wherein said another magnet is applied substantially orthogonally to said matrix material at said one end.
17. The method according to claim 15, wherein said extraction involves immersing said another magnet within said matrix material at said one end where the magnetic particles are accumulated and pulling said magnetic particles out, wherein said matrix material is pliable.
18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the matrix material is a molten polymer or a polymer solution with said magnetic particles admixed therethrough.
19. The method according to claim 1, wherein said creating a matrix material comprises stirring said matrix material, to evenly disperse said plurality of magnetic particles throughout the HARMs.
20. The method according to claim 1, wherein said HARMs have approximately no magnetic susceptibility.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter that is regarded as forming the present invention, it is believed that the invention will be better understood from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying DRAWINGS, where like reference numerals designate like structural and other elements, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(12) The following detailed description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. For purposes of explanation, specific nomenclature is set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required to practice the invention. Descriptions of specific applications are provided only as representative examples. Various modifications to the preferred embodiments will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the scope of the invention. The present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest possible scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
(13) It should be understood to one of skill in the art that the innovation described herein is related to the synthesis of a nano-hybrid catalyst for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO from stationary sources.
(14) The present invention provides a method to align high-aspect-ratio materials (HARMs) by forced movement of magnetic particles within a mixture. Initially, the HARMs and the magnetic particles are thoroughly and substantially uniformly dispersed in a matrix to achieve a homogeneous mixture. Afterwards, a magnetic field is applied to one side of the mixture to attract the magnetic particles, which start to move in a laminar fashion and uni-directionally along the lines of the magnetic field within the mixture. This movement of the magnetic particles, however, creates a drag force in the mixture, which results in the alignment of the HARMs parallel to the direction of particle movement. The magnetic particles continue to move until they eventually accumulate at the side of the mixture where the magnetic field was applied, thereby generally separating them.
(15) These accumulated particles can be easily separated from the mixture by two preferred ways. The first, known as the incision process, involves cutting the margin of the mixture where the particles are accumulated. With reference now to
(16) It should be understood that the incision method is preferable for the matrices that tend to solidify after the alignment. Accordingly, only a small portion 140 of the mixture 120 may need to be removed, which based on conducted experiments is about one-twentieth of the sample length.
(17) In a second method, referred to as the extraction process, the magnetic particles are removed by immersing or applying a second magnet generally orthogonally to the region where the particles are accumulated in order to extract them out.
(18) With reference now to
(19) The magnetic particles 240 are attracted to and held by magnet 230 and removed from the mixture 220 easily. As above, this separation is employed along only a small portion of the mixture so to not damage the above-mentioned alignment of the HARMs.
(20) Applicant has discovered that the aforementioned alignment methods and techniques are able to align all one-dimensional materials with length-to-diameter ratios higher than ten, based on their special geometry, and regardless of their physical and chemical properties. Also, according to the high magnetic susceptibility of the magnetic particles, these alignment operations can be carried out by relatively low level magnetic fields to remove virtually all of the embedded magnetic particles. Indeed, one of the most significant advantages of these methods is the elimination of magnetic particles from the material, and thus not imposing undesirable properties onto the final product because of residual magnetic particles.
(21) The HARMs
(22) It should be understood that the methodology of the present invention is applicable for alignment of various types of HARMs, such as CNTs, chopped carbon fibers, nanofibers, nanorods, nanobelts and nanowires. It should also be understood that HARMs can be referred to the materials with length-to-diameter ratios greater than four (preferably greater than ten). It should be noted that the HARMs preferably do not possess magnetic susceptibility; otherwise, they would be absorbed by the aforesaid magnetic field and accumulate on one side of the mixture.
(23) Magnetic Particles
(24) Magnetic particles that can be employed in the present invention include a wide span of the magnetic, paramagnetic, ferrimagnetic, ferromagnetic, diamagnetic and superparamagnetic materials, as is understood in the art. These particles may be comprised of iron, nickel, cobalt and their alloys. The size of the utilized magnetic particles is preferably comparable to the dimensions of the HARMs. Intense stirring of the mixture with the admixed magnetic particles is required to avoid agglomeration of the magnetic particles. It is noteworthy that the magnetic particles and the HARMs preferably do not attract each other, so as to prevent the movement and accumulation of the HARMs with magnetic particles (entrainment). Intense stirring, low contact time, use of relatively large magnetic particles, as well as the lack of any physical or chemical affinity between the HARMs and the magnetic particles, are favorable in this regard. It should be understood that one of skill in the art can determine the required concentrations of the magnetic particles according to the volume of the matrix and the concentration of the HARMs. Furthermore, the magnetic particles should be concentrated sufficiently to provide a widespread and one-directional flow across the mixture by the movement of the magnetic particles therethrough along magnetic field lines.
(25) The Magnetic Field
(26) The present invention requires a minimum field strength, which is able to absorb all the magnetic particles and direct them toward one side of the mixture, at which the magnetic field is applied. On the other hand, the magnetic field should not be so strong to cause intense absorption of the magnetic particles, which in turn results in turbulence and disruption to the alignment process. The magnetic field can be induced by simple magnets or other equipment, such as solenoids, described further hereinbelow.
(27) As discussed, in one embodiment of the present invention, the magnetic field can be fixed at one side of the mixture. In another embodiment, the magnetic field can be applied in a mobile mode, also described in more detail hereinbelow. It should be understood that fixed magnetic fields should be located on one side of the mixture and be capable of absorbing magnetic particles from all points of the mixture. Employment of a fixed magnetic field offers an easier operation procedure than the mobile one. However, fixed fields demand higher field strengths than the mobile mode due to the greater distance of some mixture regions from the magnet.
(28) With reference to
(29) As shown in
(30) In an alternate embodiment mobile mode configuration, the magnetic field is applied by crossing two magnets from top and bottom of the mixture container. The magnetic particles start to move slowly along the mixture parallel to the magnets movement.
(31) With reference now to
(32) As shown in
(33) It should be understood that magnets 410A and 410B are preferably similar and move at the same distance from the mixture material 420 in order to put the resultant force of the two magnetic fields 415A and 415B in the same direction. To ensure a complete removal of the magnetic particles 330, the magnets 410A and 410B can be moved several times throughout the admixture material 420 in the same direction.
(34) It should be understood that moving the magnets too slowly in this process may lead to the accumulation of magnetic particles 430 in upper and lower surfaces of the admixture material 420. On the other hand, moving the magnets at a higher speed of may cause incomplete collection of the magnetic particles 430 from the admixture. Furthermore, the magnetic particles so driven to the ends of the material 420 may be removed by the aforementioned incision, extraction or other process. The presented method could be easily scaled up, providing desirable features for industrial applications.
(35) With reference now to
(36) It should be understood that the required operational magnetic field strength to implement the instant invention depends on various parameters, such as the matrix volume, matrix viscosity and the magnetic susceptibility of the magnetic particles, where a stronger magnetic field is required for a higher matrix volume, higher matrix viscosity and lower susceptibility of magnetic particles.
(37) Matrix Material
(38) Various materials, including polymers, solutions, gels, molten glasses, metals, alloys and other similar materials, can be used as the matrix. However, these materials should not have magnetic susceptibility; otherwise, the magnetized matrices may accumulate along a margin of a container at which the magnetic field is applied, and the aforesaid alignment procedure would be disrupted.
(39) In an effort to illustrate the principles of the present invention, some of the experimental data gathered is discussed hereinbelow. It should, of course, be understood that whereas these examples are exemplary of the scope of the instant invention, the scope is defined by the claims hereinbelow.
EXAMPLE 1
(40) The alignment of CNTs (HARMs) was investigated in epoxy resin (matrix) to enhance the mechanical and electrical properties of the reinforced composites. Pristine multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) synthesized by a chemical vapor deposition process (diameter<30 nm, length of 5-15 m and purity>95%) were purchased from Shenzhen Nano-Tech Port Co. Commercially available epoxy resin (EPL 219) and its curing agent (EPH 5161) were purchased from Ghafari Co. in Iran. This epoxy resin should be mixed with its curing agent at the ratio of 2:1 and then cured at room temperature. All chemicals were of analytical grade.
(41) MWCNTs (15 mg) were initially dispersed in 10 g epoxy resin by an ultrasonic bath for about 4 hours. Then, iron oxide particles (15 mg Fe3O4, particles size 5 m) were added to the mixture and mixed thoroughly in a shaker for 10 minutes to achieve a homogeneous suspension of MWCNTs and the magnetic particles in the epoxy resin. The magnetic particles were not absorbed to the surface of MWCNTs due to their large size (micron-scale) and severe agitation of the mixture. A curing agent (5 g) was also added and mixed for another 10 minutes, and then molded (standard silicone mold). The magnetic field was applied quickly to the admixture, to avoid agglomeration of the magnetic particles. A simple magnet (0.2 Tesla) was used in the stationary mode, and then the admixture was allowed to rest for 48 hours at room temperature. The magnetic particles were then separated by the aforesaid incision process (where the separated part was less than one-twentieth of the sample length), as set forth hereinabove in connection with
(42) Morphology of the Reinforced Composites
(43) The morphology of the composites, reinforced with 0.1 wt % of MWCNTs, was studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Model: 5360, Oxford, Co.). Other related research works performed have similar magnifications to investigate the morphology. To avoid charging during the electron irradiation, the samples were covered with 5 nm over-layer of an AuPd alloy in an evaporator (Model: E5200C).
(44) Turning again to the DRAWINGS,
(45) Typical behavior of MWCNTs in the epoxy composite after this alignment procedure is shown in
(46) To obtain images from different cross-sections of the samples, they were broken in liquid nitrogen. With reference now to
(47) Mechanical Properties
(48) The stress-strain curves of prepared samples were investigated to evaluate the effect of MWCNTs addition and the alignment procedure of these reinforcements on mechanical properties of epoxy composites. With reference now to
(49) As shown in
(50) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 E-Modulus Tensile Sample (GPa) strength (MPa) Conductivity (S/cm) Neat epoxy 2.04 28.21 1.7 10.sup.12 Not-aligned 2.16 34.84 2.65 10.sup.12 MWCNTs Aligned MWCNTs 3.19 53.87 3.74 10.sup.12
Electrical Properties
(51) DC volume conductivity measurements were conducted to study the effect of the alignment procedure on conductivity of the prepared composites. A constant voltage was applied by a DC power supply and monitored with a digital multimeter. Contact resistance was reduced by covering the electrodes with a conducting silver epoxy. While neat epoxy is an electrical insulator, an increase in conductivity was observed with the addition of MWCNTs as a highly conductive filler, as shown in TABLE 1 hereinabove. As shown, the conductance of the aligned sample was increased about 41% in comparison to the ordinary case, suggesting good alignment of MWCNTs in the epoxy composite, especially due to very low concentration of these nanofillers (0.1 wt %). Considerable increase of conductivity may be expected for higher percentages of MWCNTs due to formation of larger chains and clusters along the mixture.
(52) Reproducibility of the Results by the Invented Method
(53) Three samples were prepared with exactly similar conditions to test the repeatability of this method. To be able to draw conclusions, another three samples were similarly prepared with the exception that they were reinforced by 0.5 wt % MWCNTs. TABLE 2 below shows the mechanical and electrical properties of these samples, which were measured by the previously mentioned methods. As can be seen, the variation of both mechanical and electrical properties is less than 10% in both MWCNT concentrations, indicating the acceptable repeatability of this alignment procedure.
(54) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 MW CNT Tensile strength (MPa) Conductivity (S/cm) wt % Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Variations Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Variations 0.1 53.87 57.26 56.03 1.85 3.74 10.sup.12 3.97 10.sup.12 3.87 10.sup.12 0.12 10.sup.12 0.5 69.73 64.87 72.27 4.08 4.54 10.sup.12 4.38 10.sup.12 4.81 10.sup.12 0.23 10.sup.12
Controllability
(55) Field strength and magnetic particles concentration were also studied, as two main parameters of the alignment quality, to control and enhance the alignment procedure. Three different magnets (0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 Tesla, respectively) were separately applied to similar mixtures to investigate the effect of field strength on the alignment quality. TABLE 3 hereinbelow shows the mechanical and electrical properties of the epoxy composites, which were treated with different magnet strengths in a stationary mode. Both of the examined mechanical properties show an increase by increasing the field strength from 0.1 to 0.2 T, which can be attributed to the stronger absorption of the magnetic particles and consequently the production of a greater shear stress in the mixture, leading to a better alignment of the MWCNTs. However, as shown in Table 3, an excessive field strength (0.5 Tesla) caused a relatively sharp reduction of both the mechanical and the electrical properties. These reductions could be due to severe turbulence (vortex creation), resulting from sudden and intense movement of the magnetic particles in the mixture, and the resulting disruption of the laminar flow lines and discontinuation of the alignment procedure.
(56) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Field strength (Tesla) Tensile strength (MPa) Conductivity (S/cm) 0.1 52.34 3.22 10.sup.12 0.2 53.87 3.74 10.sup.12 0.5 49.21 2.89 10.sup.12
(57) The concentration of the magnetic particles was also investigated as another significant parameter of the alignment operation, as shown in TABLE 4 hereinbelow. As illustrated, the results indicate that an increase in particle concentration led to an enhancement in both the mechanical and the electrical properties, which can be attributed to the greater drag force imposed on MWCNTs in the admixture and thus their uniform alignment. Similar to the aforesaid previous trend, it is expected that excessive concentration of magnetic particles may deteriorate the alignment procedure.
(58) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Particle concentration Tensile strength (MPa) Conductivity (S/cm) 0.1 wt % 51.27 3.08 10.sup.12 0.3 wt % 53.87 3.74 10.sup.12
(59) According to obtained results from the above two parameters, it can be expected that alignment quality can similarly be controlled by different operational parameters. Generally, these parameters can include the type and the concentration of the HARMs, the strength and the mode of applying magnetic field, the matrix viscosity, the type, size, magnetic susceptibility and the concentration of the magnetic particles.
(60) Magnetic Particles Movements and Accumulation
(61) Movements and accumulation of the magnetic particles in the mixture exposed to the magnetic field is another striking point that shall be discussed. The magnetic particles start to move along the magnetic field lines and form one-dimensional streaks. With reference now to
(62) With reference now to
(63) The possibility of complete exclusion of the magnetic particles after accumulation in the margin of mixture is studied to ensure removal of the undesired magnetic particles in the final product. For example, SEM images taken from the top surface (
(64) The second method can be used for samples prepared by both the incision as well as the extraction processes. In this method, the sample was completely burned in a crucible and the remaining ashes were then refluxed in a mixture of hydrochloric acid and potassium thiocyanate. Iron (III)-thiocyanate complex change the color of the solution into reddish brown. The color change of the solution was examined by UV-visible (Model: avantes-LS-1101014), and the amount of residual iron oxide in the sample was determined by its peak intensity. Calibration curves were provided based on iron-peak intensity (in the range of 474 to 479 nm) from three stock standard solutions with different iron concentrations (1, 4 and 8 ppm).
(65) With reference now to
EXAMPLE 2
(66) In this second experimental example, a study is made of the effect of the HARMs orientation on the mechanical and electrical properties, the alignment of chopped carbon fibers (CCFs), as HARMs, carried out in polyester (matrix). CCFs (30 mg, diameter<10 m, length<1 mm) were completely dispersed in polyester (15 g, Model: NRC 200) by an ultrasonic bath for 4 hours. Then, iron oxide particles (15 mg Fe3O4, particles size<0.5 mm) were added to the mixture and mixed thoroughly using a shaker for 10 minutes to achieve a homogeneous suspension. Curing agents (1.5 cc Arsenic acid and 0.15 cc Cobalt) were added and mixed for 5 min and then molded. A magnetic field (0.2 Tesla) was applied quickly to the mixture in the mobile mode by two simple magnets. The mixture was allowed to set for 72 hours at room temperature in a silicone mold. The magnetic particles were separated trough the extraction method by another magnet (0.1 Tesla). The ordinary sample, which did not undergo any alignment processes, and neat polyester were also prepared for the sake of comparison. TABLE 5 hereinbelow presents the mechanical and electrical properties of the neat polyester, the ordinarily reinforced and the aligned reinforced samples. The polyester reinforced with 0.2 wt % CCFs caused almost a minor increase in both E-Modulus (2% increase) and tensile strength (8% increase). However, the alignment procedure increases E-modulus and tensile strength of the reinforced polyester more than 12% and 20%, respectively. The electrical conductivity also followed an increase about 25% and 56% by adding chopped fiber to polyester in ordinary and aligned state, respectively.
(67) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Tensile strength Conductivity Sample E-Modulus (GPa) (MPa) (S/cm) Neat polyester 1.31 27.21 3.6 10.sup.11 Not-aligned 1.34 29.32 4.5 10.sup.11 Aligned 1.47 32.68 5.6 10.sup.11
(68) While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the breadth or scope of the applicant's concept. Furthermore, although the present invention has been described in connection with a number of exemplary embodiments and implementations, the present invention is not so limited but rather covers various modifications and equivalent arrangements, which fall within the purview of the appended claims.