Power control in bidirectional WDM optical link
09634767 ยท 2017-04-25
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
H04B10/2507
ELECTRICITY
International classification
H04B10/00
ELECTRICITY
H04B10/2507
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
A bidirectional WDM optical communications link has WDM signals sent in opposite directions along a shared optical path and using at least one common wavelength. An optical amplifier (20, 21, 22, 70, A.sub.1.sup.D, A.sub.2.sup.U, A.sub.2.sup.D) optically amplifies (144) a first WDM signal separately from a second WDM signal in the other direction. This separated optical amplification is controlled (134) according to indications of transmission quality at the common wavelength, to alter the relative optical powers of the first and second WDM signals to enable crosstalk at the common wavelength to be limited. Cross talk at the common wavelength can be improved by rebalancing relative amounts of cross talk in the different directions, to enable the capacity benefits of using a common wavelength for both directions to be obtained while using greater optical signal power. This is particularly useful where the optical power is asymmetric, such as in WDM PON systems.
Claims
1. A method of operating a bidirectional wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) optical communications link having an optical path shared by first and second WDM signals sent in opposite directions along the shared optical path and using at least one common wavelength, the method comprising: receiving indications of transmission qualities of the at least one common wavelength, of the first and second WDM signals; optically amplifying the first WDM signal while it is separated from the second WDM signal; and controlling the optical amplification according to the indications of transmission quality, to alter the relative optical powers of the first and second WDM signals for mitigating crosstalk at the common wavelength.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising separating the first and second WDM signals before the optically amplifying the first WDM signal.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the optically amplifying the first WDM signal occurs before the first WDM signal enters the shared optical path.
4. The method of claim 3, further comprising optically amplifying the first WDM signal after it has left the shared optical path.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising optically amplifying the second WDM signal separately from the first WDM signal.
6. The method of claim 5, further comprising: determining which direction of transmission of the optical signals has worse transmission quality; and thereafter, performing at least one of: for a worse direction: increasing the optical power level of the respective WDM signal before it enters the shared optical path; and decreasing the optical power level of the respective optical signal after it has left the shared optical path; for a better direction: decreasing the optical power level of the respective WDM signal before it enters the shared optical path; and increasing the optical power level of the respective WDM signal after it has left the shared optical path.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising, when the method is used in a passive optical network, using a wavelength reuse transmitter to transmit a common wavelength to form part of the second WDM signal.
8. An apparatus for controlling wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) signals in a bidirectional WDM optical communications link having an optical path shared by first and second WDM signals sent in opposite directions along the shared optical path and using at least one common wavelength, the apparatus comprising: an optical amplifier configured to amplify the first WDM signal while it is separated from the second WDM signal; and a processing circuit functioning as a controller configured to: receive indications of transmission qualities of the at least one common wavelength, of the first and second WDM signals; control the optical amplifier according to the indications of transmission quality; alter the relative optical powers of the first and second WDM signals to mitigate crosstalk at the common wavelength.
9. The apparatus of claim 8, further comprising optical circulators configured to: separate the first and second WDM signals from the shared path; and recombine them onto the shared path.
10. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the optical amplifier comprises a booster amplifier configured to amplify the first WDM signal before it enters the shared optical path.
11. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the optical amplifier comprises a pre-amplifier element configured to amplify the first WDM signal after it has left the shared optical path.
12. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the optical amplifier is configured to pass the second WDM signal without amplification.
13. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the controller is configured: to determine which direction of transmission of the optical signals has worse transmission quality; and to control the cross talk by performing at least one of the following: for that worse direction, increasing the optical power level of the respective WDM signal before it enters the shared optical path, and decreasing the optical power level of the respective optical signal after it has left the shared optical path; for the better direction, decreasing the optical power level of the respective WDM signal before it enters the shared optical path, and increasing the optical power level of the respective WDM signal after it has left the shared optical path.
14. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the link is asymmetrical and comprises optical transmitters at each end that have different output optical power levels.
15. A bidirectional wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) optical communications link, comprising: a shared optical path shared by first and second WDM signals sent in opposite directions along the shared optical path and using at least one common wavelength; an apparatus for controlling WDM signals in the bidirectional WDM optical communications link, the apparatus comprising: an optical amplifier configured to amplify the first WDM signal while it is separated from the second WDM signal; and a processing circuit functioning as a controller configured to: receive indications of transmission qualities of the at least one common wavelength, of the first and second WDM signals; control the optical amplifier according to the indications of transmission quality; alter the relative optical powers of the first and second WDM signals to mitigate crosstalk at the common wavelength.
16. A computer program product stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium to control a processing circuit for operating a bidirectional wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) optical communications link having an optical path shared by first and second WDM signals sent in opposite directions along the shared optical path and using at least one common wavelength, the computer program product comprising software instructions which, when executed by the processing circuit, causes the processing circuit to: receive indications of transmission qualities of the at least one common wavelength, of the first and second WDM signals; optically amplify the first WDM signal whilst it is separated from the second WDM signal; and control the optical amplification according to the indications of transmission quality, to alter the relative optical powers of the first and second WDM signals for mitigating crosstalk at the common wavelength.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) How the present invention may be put into effect will now be described by way of example with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(15) The present invention will be described with respect to particular embodiments and with reference to certain drawings but the invention is not limited thereto but only by the claims. The drawings described are only schematic and are non-limiting. In the drawings, the size of some of the elements may be exaggerated and not drawn to scale for illustrative purposes.
ABBREVIATIONS
(16) AWG Array Waveguide Gratings
(17) BER Bit Error Rate
(18) BIDI-OA Bidirectional Optical Amplifier
(19) EDFA Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier
(20) Optical Circulator
(21) OLT Optical Line Termination
(22) ONT Optical Network Termination
(23) OSXR Optical Signal to cross-talk Ratio
(24) PON Passive Optical Network
(25) RBS Rayleigh Backscatter
(26) RIN Relative Intensity Noise
(27) RN Remote Node
(28) RX Receiver
(29) TX Transmitter
(30) Xtalk Cross-talk
(31) WDM Wavelength Division Multiplexing
(32) WR Wavelength reuse
DEFINITIONS
(33) Where the term comprising is used in the present description and claims, it does not exclude other elements or steps and should not be interpreted as being restricted to the means listed thereafter. Where an indefinite or definite article is used when referring to a singular noun e.g. a or an, the, this includes a plural of that noun unless something else is specifically stated.
(34) Elements or parts of the described apparatus, nodes or networks may comprise logic encoded in media for performing any kind of information processing. Logic may comprise software encoded in a disk or other computer-readable medium and/or instructions encoded in an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), field programmable gate array (FPGA), or other processor or hardware.
(35) References to nodes can encompass any kind of switching node, not limited to the types described, not limited to any level of integration, or size or bandwidth or bit rate and so on.
(36) References to software can encompass any type of programs in any language executable directly or indirectly on processing hardware.
(37) References to controllers, processors, hardware, processing hardware or circuitry can encompass any kind of logic or analog circuitry, integrated to any degree, and not limited to general purpose processors, digital signal processors, ASICs, FPGAs, discrete components or logic and so on.
(38) References to a processor are intended to encompass implementations using multiple processors which may be integrated together, or co-located in the same node or distributed at different locations for example.
INTRODUCTION
(39) By way of introduction to the embodiments, how they address some issues with conventional designs will be explained. Current techniques have some problems as follows. As downstream and upstream wavelengths are shared in wavelength reuse systems, any cross-talk source between the two opposite directions must be taken under control. For example, cross-talk can arise from bad isolation in optical components or optical reflections.
(40) This makes optical amplification critical. For instance, if a bidirectional optical amplification scheme were to be placed between an OLT and a feeder fiber in a WDM PON system, with optical amplifiers acting as booster and preamplifier, respectively, any increase the gain in order to increase the power budget can have effects as follows. If, as it actually happens, the isolation of the output optical circulator is not perfect, a significant amount of power generated by the downstream booster amplifier interferes with the upstream signal at the input of the upstream preamplifier, generating cross-talk. The problem is quite serious considering that, in practical systems, downstream output power is much higher than upstream input power at the pre-amplifier.
(41) Accordingly, to address these issues, various performance optimization methods and apparatus in bidirectional optically amplified systems are shown, some passive, some active, some using remodulation. They can be applied for example in Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) access and mobile backhauling networks, based on wavelength reuse techniques to support symmetric bit rate traffic at low cost, to maximize the spectral efficiency and mitigate channel asymmetry effects, e.g. due the different propagation delay in the two directions.
(42) In summary, some examples provide a BIDIrectional Optical Amplification (BIDI-OA) scheme for a wavelength reuse bidirectional system. Some examples exploit BIDI-OA applied at both sides of the trunk fiber to significantly increase the power budget. Some examples provide a power setting method to optimize the Optical Signal to Xtalk Ratio (OSXR) in the upstream and downstream directions. A bidirectional amplification node can be realized by means of two optical circulators and two EDFAs as shown in
(43) Simplified BIDI-OA architectures where some optical amplifiers are missed are possible (
(44)
(45)
(46) A controller 30 is configured to receive indications of transmission qualities of the at least one common wavelength, of the first and second WDM signals, and to control the optical amplifier according to the indications of transmission quality, to alter the relative optical powers of the first and second WDM signals to enable crosstalk at the common wavelength to be mitigated. The indications of transmission quality can come from the receivers at each end of the optical link as shown and can be based on detecting the optical quality or can be based on a quality of the electrical signal from the receiver, either before or after the received signal is digitised, or before or after some digital processing such as FEC for example. A bit error rate is an example of transmission quality.
(47) By controlling optical amplification in one direction separately from the other, the relative optical powers in the two directions can be controlled, whether the second direction is controlled or not. Thus the cross talk can be limited or balanced in the two directions, which may provide an overall benefit even if it is actually increased in one direction. Thus performance can be improved, so that the benefits of optical amplification can be combined with the benefits of wavelength reuse. The controller can be implemented by a processor of any kind.
(48)
(49) Thus cross talk can be controlled, and even where cross talk is not the limiting factor, the better balancing of the optical powers in the two directions can help enable optical power budgeting to be more tightly controlled and enable reduced optical power margins for example, or reduced capital costs or reduced power consumption in operation.
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53) At step 150 the controller at the second end outputs control signals for controlling the optical amplification of the pre-amplifier located after the transmission fiber (cross talk location) according to the change in amplification at the first end. This involves controlling the amplification separately from the control of the second WDM signal in the other direction. This can enable the changes in power to be compensated so that the receiver is not affected or is less affected by any changes in the amplification at the booster amplifier. At step 154, the optical pre-amplifier at the second end implements the change in amplification indicated in the control signals.
(54)
(55)
(56) If the second WDM signal is worse, at step 170 control signals are generated to increase the optical amplification for the second WDM signal before it enters the shared optical path, and to decrease the optical amplification after it leaves the shared optical path, or: the optical amplification of the first WDM signal is decreased before it enters the shared optical path and increased in amplification after leaving the shared optical path. At step 180 the optical amplifiers at both ends implement the changes in amplification according to the control signals. In each of the cases, the balance of transmission quality between the two directions can be improved, and thus overall the performance can be increased as there is no longer any excess quality margin in either direction. At step 190 the control steps can be repeated if doing so continues to improve the overall transmission quality, or can be ceased otherwise.
(57)
(58)
(59) At the far side of the transmission fiber 340 there is similar apparatus for bidirectional amplification, an AWG 330, for WDM mux and demux, and a transceiver having a circulator 320, and for each wavelength, a receiver 300, and transmitter 310. The bidirectional amplification has separate control of amplification by amplifiers A.sub.2.sup.D and A.sub.2.sup.U respectively.
(60) A controller (not shown explicitly here) can be used to set output power by means of gains G.sub.1, G.sub.2 respectively of the EDFAs installed in the BIDI-OA nodes. In
(61)
(62) With reference to
P.sub.1.sup.U [dBm]=P.sub.8.sup.UG.sub.1.sup.UIL.sub.LinkIL.sub.AWG4IL.sub.circ[Eq. 1]
P.sub.1.sup.DB [dBm]=P.sub.8.sup.D+BRR+G.sub.1.sup.UIL.sub.AWG4IL.sub.circ[Eq. 2]
OSXR.sub.OTL [dB]=P.sub.1.sup.UP.sub.1.sup.DB=P.sub.8.sup.UP.sub.5.sup.DIL.sub.Link+BRR[Eq. 3]
(63) Note that:
(64) The input power signal P.sub.1.sup.U ([Eq. 1]) is proportional to both the channel output power provided by A.sub.2.sup.U booster (P.sub.8.sup.U) and the gain of the A.sub.1.sup.U pre-amplifier (G.sub.1.sup.U). The OSXR.sub.OLT ([Eq. 3]) is proportional to the channel output power provided by the A.sub.2.sup.U booster (P.sub.8.sup.U) and inversely proportional to the per-channel output power provided by the A.sub.1.sup.D booster (P.sub.5.sup.D).
(65) The same values at the Optical Network Termination (ONT) downstream receiver are:
P.sub.12.sup.D [dBm]=P.sub.5.sup.U+G.sub.2.sup.DIL.sub.LinkIL.sub.AWG3IL.sub.circIL.sub.splitter[Eq. 4]
P.sub.12.sup.UB [dBm]=P.sub.8.sup.UBRR+G.sub.2.sup.DIL.sub.AWG3IL.sub.circIL.sub.splitter[Eq. 5]
OSXR.sub.ONT [dB]=P.sub.12.sup.DP.sub.12.sup.UB=P.sub.5.sup.DP.sub.8.sup.UIL.sub.Link+BRR[Eq. 6]
(66) Note that:
(67) The input signal power P.sub.12.sup.D ([Eq. 4]) is proportional to both the channel output power provided by A.sub.1.sup.D booster (P.sub.5.sup.D) and the gain of the A.sub.2.sup.D pre-amplifier (G.sub.2.sup.D). The OSXR.sub.ONT ([Eq. 6]) is proportional to the channel output power provided by A.sub.2.sup.U booster (P.sub.5.sup.D) and inversely proportional to the per-channel output power provided by A.sub.1.sup.D booster (P.sub.8.sup.U).
(68) In a wavelength reuse system the upstream signal is more penalized with respect to the downstream signal due residual modulation due the downstream light coming from the central office and the double transmission distance. So, setting the power levels in order to have the same OSXR in downstream and upstream would result into unbalanced BER performance with downstream BER.sub.OLT (measured at the ONT receiver) better than upstream BER.sub.ONT (measured at the OLT receiver). For this reason, we will try to balance BER rather than OSXR values.
(69)
(70) Considering the previous equations regarding received powers, OSXRs and amplifier output powers and gains, the following method is proposed to set output power and gain values for the optical amplifiers.
(71) Set the optical gains of the pre-amplifiers (A.sub.1.sup.U and A.sub.2.sup.D) in order to meet predetermined received powers values (e.g. nominal receiver sensitivities or ONT injection powers).
(72) Gradually change the output powers of booster amplifiers A.sub.1.sup.D and A.sub.2.sup.U, according to the flowchart in
(73) According to the previous equations, setting the ratio between the output powers we univocally define the OSXR at both the receivers. The method also applies to simplified BIDI-OA variants such those shown in
(74) The working principle of the method, detailed in a flow chart spread across
(75) The amplifiers are initialized setting a pre-determined arbitrary output power level on the boosters and setting the preamplifiers to meet ONT and OLT input power specifications.
(76) After T=Tamp+Tmeas seconds, where Tamp is the time to reach the amplifiers steady state and Tmeas is the time window necessary for accurate BER measurement, we read the BER values on both the OLT and ONT receivers and we check if they are different or not.
(77) If the BERs are equal the method stops, otherwise we look at what is the maximum BER between BER.sub.OLT and BER.sub.ONT. This much is shown in
(78) Then, we decrement by P [dB] the downstream preamplifier gain G.sub.2.sup.D in order to maintain the same optical power at the ONT input, and then wait for the effects to settle, before reading BERs again.
(79) If, instead, BER.sub.ONT is the maximum one, we take the left path in
(80) After a wait for T seconds to allow for settling, we read the new BER values. If the new maximum value B2 is greater than the previous one B1, then the method hasn't provided the expected benefit so we come back to the previous state and the method stops. Otherwise a further method iteration is run. Then as shown, the method stops, though of course further iterations could be run.
(81) This optical amplification scheme and method enable combining the high spectral efficiency typical of wavelength reuse systems with the long distance reach typical of regular WDM systems where different wavelengths or fibers are used instead for the two propagation directions.
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
CONCLUDING REMARKS
(92) A bidirectional WDM optical communications link has WDM signals sent in opposite directions along a shared optical path and using at least one common wavelength. An optical amplifier 20, 21, 22, 70, A.sub.1.sup.D, A.sub.2.sup.U, A.sub.1.sup.U, A.sub.2.sup.D optically amplifies 144 a first WDM signal separately from a second WDM signal in the other direction. This separated optical amplification is controlled 134 according to indications of transmission quality at the common wavelength, to alter the relative optical powers of the first and second WDM signals to enable crosstalk at the common wavelength to be limited. Cross talk at the common wavelength can be improved by rebalancing relative amounts of cross talk in the different directions, to enable the capacity benefits of using a common wavelength for both directions to be obtained while using greater optical signal power. This is particularly useful where the optical power is asymmetric, such as in WDM PON systems.
(93) Other variations and examples can be envisaged within the claims.