Removal of lead from waste water using nanoscale MoS.SUB.2
11471854 · 2022-10-18
Assignee
Inventors
- Thalappil Pradeep (Chennai, IN)
- Biswajit Mondal (Chennai, IN)
- Ananthu Mahendranath (Chennai, IN)
- Anirban Som (Chennai, IN)
- Sandeep Bose (Chennai, IN)
- Tripti Ahuja (Chennai, IN)
- Avula Anil Kumar (Chennai, IN)
- Jyotirmoy Ghosh (Chennai, IN)
Cpc classification
B01D2257/60
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/3204
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/0285
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/64
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/321
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C01P2004/62
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J20/3236
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C01P2004/20
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01P2002/72
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J20/3295
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/28052
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C01G39/006
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J20/2805
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01D53/64
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/28
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The process of reacting nanoscale ce-MoS.sub.2 nanosheets anchored on oxide support with lead in solution at room temperature whereby the reaction is rapid and spontaneous resulting in the formation of PbMoO.sub.4-xS.sub.x in the process of scavenging Pb.sup.2+ and Pb.sup.4+ present in the solution.
Claims
1. A process for scavenging lead (Pb) species from a solution, comprising—reacting nanoscale chemically exfoliated molybdenum disulfide (ce-MoS.sub.2) nanosheets anchored on oxide supports with lead in solution at room temperature to obtain a reaction, whereby the reaction is rapid and spontaneous in a basic medium and results in formation of PbMoO.sub.4-xS.sub.x, and thereby scavenging the lead species as either or both of Pb.sup.2+ and Pb.sup.4+-from the solution.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein the ce-MoS.sub.2 nanosheets have a size up to 1 μm in length and a thickness of 1-3 layers.
3. The process of claim 1, wherein the lead in solution is in a Pb.sup.2+ and Pb.sup.4+ state.
4. The process of claim 1, wherein the solution comprises one or more anions as counter ions for Pb.sup.2+ and Pb.sup.4+, said anions being selected from CH.sub.3CO.sub.2−, Cl—, NO.sub.3.sup.2−, SO.sub.4.sup.2−, and O.sup.2−.
5. The process of claim 1, wherein the ce-MoS.sub.2 nanosheets are supported on oxide and polymeric substrates that comprise one or more of SiO.sub.2, Al.sub.2O.sub.3, polystyrene and polyvinyl chloride.
6. The process of claim 1, wherein the supported ce-MoS2 nanosheets comprise a filter in a filtering device to remove lead (Pb) species from the solution, the filtering device comprising at least one format selected from a candle, a molded porous block, a filter bed, a column, packets and bags.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein the solution is selected from an aqueous solution and a non aqueous solution.
8. The process of claim 1, wherein the solution comprises air and the lead species is present in the air, in suspended form.
9. The process of claim 1, wherein ce-MoS.sub.2 reacts with either or both of Pb.sup.2+ and Pb.sup.4+.
10. A process—for scavenging a heavy metal species from a solution, comprising—reacting—nanoscale chemically exfoliated molybdenum disulfide (ce-MoS.sub.2) nanosheets anchored on oxide supports with a heavy metal in solution at room temperature to obtain a reaction, whereby the reaction is rapid and spontaneous in a basic medium and results in formation of a heavy metal-MoO.sub.4-xS.sub.x, and thereby scavenging the heavy metal species from the solution, wherein the heavy metal comprises at least one of lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury and chromium.
Description
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7) Referring to the drawings, the embodiments of the present invention are further described. The figures are not necessarily drawn to scale, and in some instances the drawings have been exaggerated or simplified for illustrative purposes only. One of ordinary skill in the art may appreciate the many possible applications and variations of the present invention based on the following examples of possible embodiments of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(8) The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
(9) The present invention explored the difference in chemical reactivity of bulk MoS.sub.2 (b-MoS.sub.2) versus its chemically exfoliated nanoscale analogue (ce-MoS.sub.2), with Pb.sup.2+ and Pb.sup.4+ in solution. While b-MoS.sub.2 turned out to be completely unreactive, ce-MoS.sub.2 rapidly transformed to PbMoO.sub.4-xS.sub.x in a reaction utilizing hydroxyl ions in solution. We show such reactions of ce-MoS.sub.2 anchored on oxide supports can be effective means to scavenge Pb.sup.2+ and Pb.sup.4+ in solution, creating novel media for heavy metal remediation in waste water.
(10) The following sections provide the detailed description of a method of synthesizing MoS.sub.2NSs, the proposed driving mechanism behind the interaction of lead ions and MoS.sub.2 NSs, in an aqueous medium, and its application in heavy metal remediation in waste water. As the science will happen irrespective of the medium, the same will be the chemistry in a non-aqueous medium as well.
(11) Synthesis of Chemically Exfoliated MoS2 Nanosheets:
(12) The synthesis of chemically exfoliated MoS.sub.2 nanosheets (ce-MoS.sub.2NSs) was carried out using a conventional chemical exfoliation method [Coleman, J. N., et al. Science (Washington, D.C., U. S.) 2011, 331, 568-571]. In an inert atmosphere of argon, 3 mL of 1.6 M n-butyllithium in hexane was added to 300 mg of bulk MoS.sub.2 (powder) taken in a round-bottom flask. The system was left with constant stirring for nearly 48 h, maintaining the inert atmosphere. After 48 h, the lithium intercalated product (LixMoS.sub.2) was collected and washed repeatedly with hexane to remove the unreacted n-butyllithium. 100 mL of distilled water was then added to this intercalated material and the system was sonicated for 1 h using a bath sonicator. Finally, this aqueous dispersion of MoS.sub.2 NSs was centrifuged at 18000 rpm for 15 minutes to remove the unexfoliated MoS.sub.2 as a precipitate. The supernatant containing the ce-MoS.sub.2 NS was used for reactivity studies.
(13) Reaction of ce-MoS.sub.2 NSs with Pb.sup.2+:
(14) 4 ml of as prepared MoS.sub.2 NSs dispersion in water (4.2 mM, in term of Mo concentration) was taken in a reaction bottle, to which 1 mL (23 mM) of lead acetate solution was added. A white precipitate was observed immediately, upon the addition of Pb(OAC).sub.2. The reaction was continued for 6 h under constant magnetic stirring and was monitored by UV/Vis spectroscopy. The reaction mixture was then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min. The precipitate was collected and washed repeatedly with H.sub.2O to remove the excess reactants. Concentration-dependent reactions were performed by keeping the ce-MoS.sub.2 concentration same (4 mL, 4.2 mM) and varying Pb (OAC).sub.2 concentration (23 mM, 46 mM, 66 mM and 92 mM).
(15) Reaction of ce-MoS.sub.2 NSs with Pb.sup.4+:
(16) Reaction with Pb.sup.4+ was done in a similar fashion as in the case of Pb.sup.2+, except for the use of a mixed solvent (H.sub.2O: acetic acid 1:1) as Pb.sup.4+ Source used (PbO.sub.2) is not soluble in H.sub.2O.
(17) The present invention shows that the chemical exfoliation of MoS.sub.2 NSs involved two steps. The first step involved the intercalation and in the second step, the intercalated product was exfoliated in water. The quality of the NSs was examined using various spectroscopic and microscopic techniques. Typically, ce-MoS.sub.2 NSs were of 200 to 1000 nm in length and had an average thickness of 2-3 layers (
(18) The quality of the NSs was further probed using Raman spectroscopy. On comparing the Raman spectra (
(19) The reaction products between Pb.sup.2+/Pb.sup.4+ and MoS.sub.2, in its bulk and 2D nanoscale forms, were investigated. Solutions of Pb.sup.2+ and Pb.sup.4+, added to the b-MoS.sub.2 (powder) separately, remained unreactive for an extended period of time without any visible change in either the color of the dispersion or the morphology and chemical composition of the MoS.sub.2 particles. The inactiveness of b-MoS.sub.2 towards lead ions can be explained by thermochemical values. In stark contrast to this behaviour of b-MoS.sub.2, ce-MoS.sub.2 showed an immediate reaction with both the ions. Upon mixing lead ions (both Pb.sup.2+ and Pb.sup.4+, separately) with ce-MoS.sub.2 dispersion, an immediate visual change was noticed. The light green color of the ce-MoS.sub.2 dispersion turned milky white, followed by immediate precipitation of the reaction products. The white precipitate was collected and washed several times with water to remove any unreacted reactants. Both the ions (Pb.sup.2+ and Pb.sup.4+) gave the chemically identical reaction products, however, with different morphologies (
(20) Pb, Mo, O, and S, as confirmed from EDS spectroscopy. To test our hypothesis, the material was hydrothermally treated at various temperatures with the expectation that these metastable phases will transform into a single, thermodynamically stable phase. An exact match with PbMoO.sub.4 in PXRD pattern was observed after 24 h of hydrothermal treatment of the product at 190° C. (black trace,
(21) Reaction with Pb.sup.4+ creates PbMoO.sub.4-xS.sub.x directly although the particles are much smaller making a broad PXRD. The morphology of the product was completely different in the Pb.sup.4+ case. To confirm whether this product is indeed the same product as in the Pb.sup.2+ case with different morphology, the final reaction product was subjected to PXRD after washing with a mixed solvent (H.sub.2O: acetic acid). The obtained PXRD pattern was an exact match with PbMoO.sub.4. The product then was also subjected to hydrothermal treatment at conditions similar to the previous case. Subsequently, PXRD measurement was done. All the peaks of the product became sharper without the disappearance of any, suggesting an increased crystallinity in the product after hydrothermal treatment. SEM images at different magnifications showed the rice grain kind of morphology of the final product (
(22) In order to further investigate the final product with rice-grain kind of morphology, mechanical grinding, of the same, was done using mortar and pestle. During the grinding, a visible colour change was observed from white to black in the inset of
(23) In order to further confirm the formation of the final product, the chemical state of the elements were analyzed using XPS (
4(OH).sup.−.fwdarw.2H.sub.2O+O.sub.2+4e.sup.−
Although the reaction is thermochemically nonspontaneous, it can be driven forward due to the involvement of metal ions. We conjecture that acetate ions (coming from lead acetate) are getting reduced to ethanol during the course of the reaction to balance the charge. To prove this, the same reaction was done taking lead nitrate as a precursor and the formation of NO.sub.2 was examined by in situ mass spectrometric detection. Both the reactant solutions were purged with Ar to remove the dissolved O.sub.2, separately. Then the lead nitrate solution was injected into the MoS.sub.2 dispersion taken into an enclosed vessel. The mixture of gases inside the vessel were analysed after 2 h reaction using a residual gas analyzer. An increase in ion current was observed for both NO.sub.2 and N.sub.2 due to the increase in partial pressures of the corresponding gases. When the control (MoS.sub.2 dispersion without lead acetate solution) was analysed, reduced ion current for NO.sub.2 was observed while ion current for N.sub.2 (background gas) remained the same. The control and sample were analysed under identical reaction conditions to account for some unavoidable leakage. So, the overall reaction for the second and third step can be written as follows:
2Mo(IV)+2O.sub.2+4NO.sub.3.sup.−+2H.sub.2O+4e.sup.−.fwdarw.2MoO.sub.4.sup.2−+4NO.sub.2+4H.sup.+ (2)
MoO.sub.4.sup.2−+Pb.sup.2++S.sup.2−.fwdarw.PbMoO.sub.4-xS.sub.x (3)
The experiment suggests the formation of an acid which was again supported by the decrease in the pH during the course of the reaction. With tap water, it was observed that as long as lead ions are present, these reactions do occur upon introducing n-MoS.sub.2.
(24) This unusual reactivity can be used for the capture and removal of lead ions from water. In a typical batch experiment, 50 mg of ce-MoS.sub.2 adsorbed (0.5 mL, 4.2 mM, in term of Mo concentration) on alumina or silica was taken in a 200 mL of conical flask containing 50 mL of Pb.sup.2+ solution. The removal % and uptake were calculated using the equations mentioned below:
(25)
Where C.sub.o and C.sub.e are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of the metal ions, respectively, V is the volume of the solution (L) and m is the mass of the adsorbent (g). The removal capacities of Al.sub.2O.sub.3@ce-MoS.sub.2 (282 mg/g) and SiO.sub.2@MoS.sub.2 (199 mg/g) nanocomposites for Pb.sup.2+ were evaluated using the Freundlich adsorption isotherm. A plot of log q.sub.e (q.sub.e=heavy metal uptake) vs log c.sub.e (c.sub.e=equilibrium concentration of heavy metal ion) showed a straight line with intercepts 0.97, 0.68, 2.45 and 2.3 and slopes 0.47, 0.63, 1.05 and 0.80 for Al.sub.2O.sub.3, SiO.sub.2, ce-MS.sub.2@Al.sub.2O.sub.3 and ce-MoS.sub.2@SiO.sub.2, respectively. Batch experiments were performed with different initial concentrations ranging from 1 ppm to 200 ppm. The data were then fitted using the linear form of Freundlich adsorption isotherm,
(26)
where k.sub.f is the amount of heavy metal ions adsorbed per g of adsorbent (mg/g). Although Freundlich isotherm is not perfectly valid due to the chemical reaction between MoS.sub.2 and Pb.sup.2+ ions, such models were used in similar case where MoO.sub.3 reacted with Pb.sup.2+ but still Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherm were applied to calculate the adsorption capacity [Wu, Y et al., Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2017, 491, 80-88].
(27) It may be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the drawings, examples and detailed description herein are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive manner.