Persistent-mode MRI magnet fabricated from reacted, monofilamentary MgB2 wires and joints

Abstract

A superconducting magnet and method for making a superconducting magnet, are presented. The superconducting magnet is made by forming a coil from windings of a first wire comprising a reacted MgB.sub.2 monofilament, filling a cavity of a stainless steel billet with a Mg+B powder. Monofilament ends of the first wire and a similar second wire are sheared at an acute angle and inserted into the billet. A copper plug configured to partially fill the billet cavity is inserted into the billet cavity. A portion of the billet adjacent to the plug and the wires is sealed with a ceramic paste.

Claims

1. A superconducting wire joint, comprising: a billet comprising a cavity with a single cavity opening; a plug disposed within the single cavity opening configured to partially fill the billet cavity and to form a partial seal of the single cavity opening; and a first monofilament superconducting wire and a second monofilament superconducting wire, each of the first and second wire Anther comprising an end of the monofilament sheared, wherein the first wire end and the second wire end are disposed within the billet cavity, the first wire and second wire extending outward from the single billet cavity opening via a gap from the partial seal between the billet and the plug, and the billet cavity is filled with a pressurized ceramic powder.

2. The superconducting wire joint of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first monofilament superconducting wire and the second monofilament superconducting wire comprises a reacted MgB.sub.2 monofilament.

3. The superconducting wire joint of claim 1, further comprising a sealing material sealing a portion of the billet adjacent to the plug and the wires.

4. The superconducting wire joint of claim 3, wherein the sealing material comprises a ceramic paste.

5. The superconducting wire joint of claim 1, wherein the wire end is sheared at an acute angle with respect to a center axis of the wire.

6. The superconducting wire joint of claim 1, wherein the ceramic powder comprises Mg+B.

7. The superconducting wire joint of claim 1, wherein the billet comprises stainless steel.

8. The superconducting wire joint of claim 1, wherein the plug comprises copper.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principals of the invention.

(2) FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram of a wire joint under the first embodiment in an exploded view.

(3) FIG. 1B is a schematic diagram of the wire joint under the first embodiment in an assembled perspective view.

(4) FIG. 1C is a schematic diagram of the wire joint under the first embodiment from a side cutaway view.

(5) FIG. 1D is a schematic diagram of the wire joint under the first embodiment from a top view.

(6) FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an exemplary method for forming the wire joint of FIGS. 1A-1D.

(7) FIG. 3 is a chart summarizing critical currents under the first embodiment, measured at 10 K, 15 K, and 20 K in self-field, of 12 angle-cut MgB.sub.2 joints.

(8) FIG. 4 is a plot of resistance vs. temperature profile of an MgB.sub.2 joint of FIG. 3.

(9) FIG. 5 is a graph plotting magnetization vs. field trace of a bundle of 12 short samples of monofilament MgB.sub.2.

(10) FIG. 6 is a graph plotting magnetization vs. field trace of a bundle of short samples of prior art monofilament NbTi.

(11) FIG. 7 is a graph plotting voltage vs. current curve of the MgB.sub.2 test coil measured at 15 K and in self-field at a ramping rate of 1 A/s.

(12) FIG. 8 is a graph plotting voltage vs. current curve of the MgB.sub.2 test coil measured at 15 K and in self-field at a ramping rate of 5 A/s.

(13) FIG. 9 is schematic diagram of an MRI magnet under a second exemplary embodiment.

(14) FIG. 10 is schematic diagram of an MRI magnet system under an alternative exemplary embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(15) Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used in the drawings and the description to refer to the same or like parts. As used within this disclosure, reacted refers to a ceramic material that has been solidified, for example, by heating a ceramic powder.

(16) As noted previously, prior art MRI magnets were generally formed of multifilament NbTi wire. As noted above, NbTi wire exhibits flux jumping behavior, necessitating multi-filament wires. Superconducting NbTi wires must be cooled by liquid helium. Further, previous methods of joining reacted monofilament wires were problematic, making MRI magnets using such wires unfeasible. Embodiments of the present invention include an MRI magnet made from reacted, monofilament reacted magnesium diboride (MgB.sub.2) wires, including a persistent superconducting joint. The combination of this reacted joint with the monofilament MgB.sub.2 magnet makes this novel technology valuable.

(17) Under a first exemplary embodiment, a joint is formed by splicing two reacted MgB.sub.2 monofilament superconducting wires. For example, such wires are manufactured by HyperTech, consisting, from innermost to outermost, of an MgB.sub.2 core of 0.4 mm in diameter, a layer of niobium, a layer of copper, and a layer of Monel. For example, an overall diameter of the wire may be 0.8 mm bare. In applying the splicing technique (described below), the joining may occur at a sintering temperature of 700 C. for 90 minutes, a combination of temperature and duration required to react the winding itself. This is important because an MRI magnet of the second embodiment (described below) applies a wind-and-react procedure. The MRI magnet is wound with MgB.sub.2 in a fashion similar to winding with NbTi wire, as is familiar to persons having ordinary skill in the art, so this disclosure instead discusses the differences involved in using MgB.sub.2 wire for an MRI magnet, and in particular, an MgB.sub.2 wire joint.

(18) FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a modified joining fabrication process of a joint 100 between two reacted MgB.sub.2 wires 130 is shown in FIGS. 1A-1D. It should be noted that any process descriptions or blocks in flowcharts should be understood as representing modules, segments, portions of code, or steps that include one or more instructions for implementing specific logical functions in the process, and alternative implementations are included within the scope of the present invention in which functions may be executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those reasonably skilled in the art of the present invention.

(19) As shown by block 210 a cladding of the wires 130 surrounding the monofilaments 135, for example, copper and Monel cladding, is etched, for example, with nitric acid. The filaments 135 may be preferably sheared at an acute angle for each wire 130, as shown by block 220. For example, the filaments 135 may be sheared at an angle of 45 degrees or less with respect to a center axis of the wire. A more acute angle provides a larger splicing surface, better enabling conduction through the joint. In general, the more acute the wire cutting angle, the better, although a joint 100 may function correctly even if the wires 130 are cut at a 90 degree angle with respect to a center axis of the wire 130. Ideally, a cut could be made nearly parallel to the axis of the wire (splitting the wire in half), although this may not be practical with a shear.

(20) A billet 110, is formed from a material able to withstand and/or exert appropriate pressure on the contents of a cavity 115 within the billet 110. For example, the billet 110 may be formed of stainless steel. Other materials for the billet 110 may be used, provided the materials have a melting point greater than a heat treatment temperature of 700 Celsius, and a Young's modulus of greater than 60 MPa. The cavity 115 is filled with a ceramic powder 150, for example, pre-mixed Mg+B powder having a 1:2 ration of Mg to B. However, other ratios are possible, for example, a more magnesium-rich ratio of Mg:B>1:2. In general, a ratio of at least 1 part Mg to 2 parts B is acceptable, as the magnesium vaporizes.

(21) A plug 120, for example, a copper plug, is inserted into the billet cavity 115 without applying pressure to the ceramic powder 150, as shown by block 230. Other materials for the plug 120 may be used, provided the materials have a melting point greater than a heat treatment temperature of 700 Celsius, and aYoung's modulus of greater than 60 MPa. The two wires 130 are inserted into the billet cavity 115 in an opening between a flat surface 125 of the plug 120 and the billet 110, aligning the wires 130 so that the angle-cut surfaces of the filaments 135 face each other within the cavity 115, as shown by block 240. The plug 120 is pressed into the billet cavity 115 to partially seal the top of the billet 110, as shown by block 250.

(22) Pressure is applied to the top of the plug 120 downward into the billet cavity 115 in a direction parallel to a center axis of the wires 130, so that the pressure is less likely to damage the sheared monofilaments 135 than pressure applied in a direction traversing the center axis of the wires 130. For example, pressure levels on the order of 1 GPa (higher than the yield strength of stainless steel) may be applied to press the plug 110 into the billet cavity 115. If other high density ceramics or unreacted wires are used, higher pressures may be used, for example, stresses in the 2-5 GPa range, which may need additional tooling to keep the billet in isostatic compression, so that no deformation occurs. If excessive pressure is used, the billet 120 or the plug 110 may be damaged. If insufficient pressure is applied, the joint 100 may not function correctly. The top of the billet 110 is sealed, for example, using ceramic paste 140, completely sealing the top of the billet cavity 115, as shown by block 260.

(23) The three main benefits to this new process are that: (1) the relatively fragile sheared filaments 135 are aligned with the pressing direction of the plug 120, reducing the possibility of breaking the filaments 135, (2) the acute angle cut of the filaments 135 maximizes the joint surface area, resulting in higher joint critical currents and better reproducibility, and (3) this method implements simpler parts and minimizes handling and assembly time when compared with the prior art.

(24) Compared with the prior art, key differences in forming a reacted joint 100 under the first embodiment may include one or more of: (1) higher powder compaction pressure; (2) a billet able to enable these higher packing pressures; (3) a change in the tooling required to apply these high pressures; and (4) changes in the heat treatment profile, including time and/or temperature. For example, while heat treatment should exceed the melting temperature of magnesium (650 C), otherwise there is no upper bound to either the time or temperature for the heat treatment profile.

(25) In alternative embodiments, the copper steel (or stainless steel) plug 120 may incorporate a center hole through which the wires 130 are inserted. A compacting rod used to press the plug 120 into the billet cavity 115 may similarly have a center hole to accommodate the ends of the wires 130. The compacting rod may accommodate a tight fit to the outside of the billet 110. In this manner, force may be applied symmetrically down the center axis of the billet 110, preventing any bending which could snap the wires 130. Such a compacting rod may provide compressing the billet 110 to higher loads upwards of 10,000 lbs. in order to exceed 1 GPa powder packing pressure. At these high pressures, it may be difficult to extract the billet 110 from the compacting rod. Other compressing means are also possible, for example, but not limited to including a two part mold for this process.

(26) As noted previously, while joints for unreacted wire are relatively simple, constructing an MRI magnet from unreacted wire is problematic, as each of the components of the magnet would have to be subject to the heating of the reacting process. Therefore, the former or bobbin of a magnet coil would need to be made of a material to withstand this heat. In contrast, a reacted wire magnet may be wound on a non-metallic, lightweight former, such as G-10 or Garolite, or similar composites, which are commonly used in MRI magnets today.

(27) FIG. 3 shows a summary of superconducting joint results of ten sample monofilament MgB.sub.2 wires, measured at 10 K, 15 K, and 20 K in self-field, of 12 angle-cut MgB.sub.2 joints. Most samples had critical currents higher than 100 A, even at 20 K. 400 A was the limit of the power supply. Critical currents were measured by the four-probe method familiar to persons having ordinary skill in the art. Since the MgB.sub.2 filament is surrounded by niobium, the only part exposed to the Mg+B mixture ingot in a joint 100 (FIG. 1B) is an end tip of the wire filament 135 (FIG. 1B) of small contact area. Therefore, in the first embodiment, each filament 135 (FIG. 1B) is cut at an acute angle to enlarge this contact area significantly. FIG. 3 data show that all the joints have acceptable (>100 A) critical currents. The best joints have critical currents well above 100 A, e.g., sample #5 with 270 A even at 20 K, which will suffice for use in a 0.5 T whole-body MRI magnet operating nominally at 10-15 K.

(28) FIG. 4 is a plot of a resistance vs. temperature profile of one of the MgB.sub.2 joints of FIG. 3. The critical temperature was determined by measuring the joint resistance during cool-down. The data are plotted in FIG. 4, showing the onset of the superconducting transition at about 36 K. However, the whole joint is not superconducting above about 32 K. This rather broad transition observed in the joint 100 (FIG. 1B) may be due to a slight difference in composition of powders used in the two wires and in the ingot. The steeper section may represent the transition of wire, while the gradual section may represent the transition of the ingot in the joint.

(29) With a successful splicing technique for monofilament MgB.sub.2 wire, an MRI magnet with monofilament MgB.sub.2 wire becomes feasible. Note that it is generally agreed, because of flux jumping, that monofilament NbTi wire is unsuitable for magnets. However, theoretically flux jumping is unlikely to happen in MgB.sub.2 wire at 15 K, even if the monofilament is 0.4 mm in diameter. The absence of flux jumping in such monofilament MgB.sub.2 wire was verified by a series of experiments with short MgB.sub.2 samples and MgB.sub.2 test coils, described below.

(30) Short samples of MgB.sub.2 were cut from the same spool used to make test joints. The joints were heat treated in the same temperature vs. time profile used for the joints and the test coils, i.e., a temperature of 700 C. for 90 minutes. A bundle of 12 reacted samples was inserted into the cold bore (6.4 mm in diameter) of a miniature NbTi magnet. With the NbTi magnet sweeping at a constant rate of 0.5 T/s, the sample magnetization was measured using a small search coil. Besides MgB.sub.2, a bundle of monofilament NbTi short samples, of the similar filament (0.4 mm) and overall size, was also tested as a reference. Since NbTi magnet was employed as the background magnet, these tests were performed at 4.2 K only.

(31) FIG. 5 shows a magnetization vs. field trace of the monofilament MgB.sub.2 bundle. The trace is generally smooth, except the zero-field dips in magnetization: each small dip is likely caused by a partial flux jump.

(32) FIG. 6 shows a magnetization vs. field trace of the monofilament NbTi bundle. Four in-field dips in magnetization trace indicate partial flux jumps. The zero-field dips are also more pronounced than those of the monofilament MgB.sub.2 bundle.

(33) In order to further demonstrate that the absence of full flux jumping observed in short monofilament MgB.sub.2 wires still holds in coils, a test coil was built, wound with 100-m long of the same monofilament MgB.sub.2 wire. The wire, S-glass insulated, has an overall diameter of 1 mm.

(34) The coil, at 15 K and in self-field, was first charged at a ramping rate of 1 A/s until it quenched at 160 A, which was its critical current predicted by short sample tests. A measured voltage vs. current curve is shown in FIG. 7, displaying many voltage spikes. Each voltage spike may be caused by a flux jump or a mechanical disturbance incident, as the test coil was not epoxy-impregnated, a standard procedure in NbTi magnets to minimize the mechanical disturbances. As expected, none of these voltage spike incidents quenched the test coil.

(35) To further test the coil stability, the coil was charged at a higher ramping rate of 5 A/s. As shown by FIG. 8, the spikes are obviously stronger. But, still, they did not quench the coil even at 90% of the coil's critical current. The procedure was repeated several times, and every time the coil was charged up to 90% of its critical current without quench. Therefore this monofilament MgB.sub.2 coil, despite evidences of either flux motion, mechanical disturbance, or both, was operated absolutely quench free.

(36) A second embodiment of the present invention is an MRI magnet 900 formed with a persistent-mode monofilament MgB.sub.2 coil 910, as shown by FIG. 9. After the monofilament MgB.sub.2 test coil was operated quench free, the persistent-mode monofilament MgB.sub.2 coil 910 was designed, fabricated, and tested. The coil 910 may be formed by winding multiple windings of reacted MgB.sub.2 wires 130. The coil 910 may be equipped with a PCS 920 and terminated by a superconducting joint 100, for example, as described above under the first embodiment. The coil 910 may be wound, for example, with 50-m long monofilament MgB.sub.2 wire, as per the tests described above. The wire 130 may be insulated by S-glass. The calculated center field may be, for example, 0.84 T at 100 A current, at which the maximum field in the winding is 0.94 T. The joint 100 may be placed at the upper edge of the coil, in which the maximum field is 0.35 T at 100 A. The PCS may contain the same wire of 1 m long, having 2 m open resistance.

(37) After the coil was wound and heat treated, it was placed in a copper can (not shown), which is housed in an aluminum chamber (not shown). The can provided an isothermal environment for the coil. A heater (not shown) was wound around the can to heat it up above 4.2 K during the tests. The copper can was then placed in the aluminum chamber. The space in between the two enclosures was filled with Styrofoam. The aluminum chamber was immersed in liquid helium during tests, with the heater controlling the temperature of copper can in the range of 4.2 K-15 K.

(38) In the beginning of the test, the PCS 920 was opened, and the coil at 10 K was charged by an external power supply at 0.5 A/s up to 100 A. Since the time constant of the coil 910 is calculated to be 2 s, a few seconds at 100 A elapsed before closing the PCS, and the external power supply was then brought to zero.

(39) During charging sequence the field at the center of the coil 910 increased linearly with current. The charging behavior indicates that 2-m open-resistance of the PCS 920 is large enough for this 3.2-mH coil, allowing only negligible current through the PCS 920. A measured field of 0.83 T at the center matched the calculation, with calculated fields of 0.94 T (maximum in the winding) and 0.35 T (at joint site). The coil 920 was warmed up from 10 K to 15 K at 0.2 K/min and kept at 15 K over a period of 2500 s. Limited by measurement resolution, one can only determine a relative field decay of less than 10-4 over a test period of 2500 s. This means that the time constant is longer than 2.510.sup.7 s, with a computed total circuit resistance of less than 1.310.sup.10.

(40) MgB.sub.2 has a critical temperature of 39 K, enabling MgB.sub.2 magnets under the second embodiment to operate above 4.2 K, the nominal temperature of most NbTi MRI magnets. Operation above 4.2 K may reduce the complexity and cost of MRI units. The simple chemical composition of MgB.sub.2 makes the manufacturing of km-long wires possible.

(41) MgB.sub.2 magnets under the second embodiment may be operated above 10 K, at which temperature the filament diameter can be on the order of 1 mm without causing flux-jumping. It has been demonstrated that MgB.sub.2 wires with 0.8 mm diameter (and 0.4 mm internal filament diameter) can indeed be made without flux jumping. The present invention is not limited to such measurements. Furthermore, it is significantly easier to make a superconducting joint between two monofilament wires, as opposed to joining multifilament wires.

(42) In an alternative embodiment, shown in FIG. 10, one or more superconducting joints 100 in a magnet system 1000 may be located in a joint box 1010. The joint box 1010 may be used to heat or cool the joint(s) 100, as may be needed for a particular magnet system 1000. For example, The joints 100 may all be heat treated simultaneously in a localized furnace 1020 which surrounds the joint box 1010. Additionally, the joint box 1010 may be cooled to a lower temperature (minimum value of 1.8 K, corresponding to superfluid helium) than a temperature of the main magnet 910 in order to improve performance of the joint(s) 100. In this manner, it is possible to use the superconducting properties of the niobium coating on the MgB2 filament to achieve the joint 100 superconductivity. For example, the superconducting path may be from one reacted MgB2 filament, thru the niobium barrier, thru the reacted powder in the joint billet, thru the second niobium barrier and into the second MgB2 filament. The main magnet 910 may still operate at 10 K, while the joint box 1010 operates at the lower temperature.

(43) In summary, the combination of the monofilament wire and the novel joint-making process makes it not only possible, but also practical, to make a persistent MgB.sub.2 joint. For example, a MRI magnet manufacturer could purchase insulated superconducting MgB.sub.2 wire from the wire manufacturer then simply wind the magnet and make the joint. Therefore, the magnet manufacturer would not be responsible for the performance of the wire, in contrast with prior art magnets, where the magnet manufacturer was responsible for the proper heat treatment of the wire in magnet form and needed to accept the risk of improper heat treatment. Embodiments of the present invention therefore have the potential to replace some, if not all, of the world's existing MRI magnets, given the looming helium crisis. The technology may open up new markets in countries where that do not even have access to liquid helium.

(44) It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the structure of the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the present invention cover modifications and variations of this invention provided they fall within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.