Iron oxide pigments containing Al

Abstract

Aluminium-containing iron oxide pigments of the formula Fe.sub.2-xAl.sub.xO.sub.3 with x values from 0.01 to 0.25, characterized in that they possess an a* value of 30.5 to 32.5 CIELAB units and a b* value of 25.5 to 30.5 CIELAB units, measured in each case as full shade in the alkyd resin according to DIN EN ISO 787-25:2007.

Claims

1. A process for producing aluminium-containing haematite pigments of formula Fe.sub.2-xAl.sub.xO.sub.3 with x values from 0.01 to 0.25, wherein the pigments possess an a* value of 30.5 to 32.5 CIELAB units and a b* value of 25.5 to 30.5 CIELAB units, and Al-containing iron oxides have a saturation Cab* of 39.8 to 44.6 CIELAB units, measured in each case as full shade in the alkyd resin according to DIN EN ISO 787-25:2007, comprising at least the steps of a) precipitation, b) oxidation and c) calcination, wherein: a1) an aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium, a molar ratio of iron ions to Al ions being 199:1 to 7:1, is reacted with sodium hydroxide NaOH, as an alkaline compound, with the aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium being metered into an initial charge of the alkaline compound, or a2) an aqueous solution comprising ions of iron and of sulfate is reacted with sodium hydroxide NaOH, as an alkaline compound, and with at least one alkali metal aluminate aluminium compound, with the molar ratio of iron in the solution to aluminium in the aluminium compound being 199:1 to 7:1 and with the alkaline compound being introduced as an initial charge with the at least one alkali metal aluminate aluminium compound, and the aqueous solution comprising ions of iron and of sulfate being metered in, b) an aqueous suspension obtained after step a1) or a2) is oxidized in the presence of an oxidizing agent, and c) an oxidation product obtained after b) is calcined at a temperature of 500 to 1100° C. in an oxidizing atmosphere.

2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium in step a1) has an Fe(III) fraction of 5 to 30 mol %, based on a total amount of iron in the solution.

3. The process according to claim 1 comprising at least the steps of a) precipitation, b) oxidation and c) calcination, wherein: a1) an aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium, the molar ratio of iron ions to Al ions being 199:1 to 7:1, is reacted with sodium hydroxide NaOH, as an alkaline compound, with the aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium being metered into the initial charge of the alkaline compound in the form of its aqueous solution, or a2) an aqueous solution comprising ions of iron and of sulfate is reacted with sodium hydroxide NaOH, as an alkaline compound, and with an aluminium compound sodium aluminate, with the molar ratio of iron in the solution to aluminium in the aluminium compound being 199:1 to 7:1 and with the alkaline compound being introduced as an initial charge with an aluminium compound sodium aluminate solution, and the aqueous solution comprising ions of iron and of sulfate being metered in, b) an aqueous suspension obtained after step a1) or a2) is oxidized in the presence of an oxidizing agent, and c) an oxidation product obtained after b) is calcined at a temperature of 500 to 1100° C. in an oxidizing atmosphere.

4. A process for colouring of pastes, paints, plastics, paper and building materials, wherein the pigments of formula Fe.sub.2-xAl.sub.xO.sub.3 with x values from 0.01 to 0.25 made by a process according to claim 1 are utilized.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 shows a profile of the C.sub.ab* values in polyethylene (HD-PE) as a function of processing temperature.

(2) FIG. 2 shows a determination of optimum calcining temperature in a full-shade diagram.

DESCRIPTION

(3) The invention therefore relates to Al-containing iron oxide pigments of the formula Fe.sub.2-xAl.sub.xO.sub.3 with x values from 0.01 to 0.25, characterized in that they possess an a* value of 30.5 to 32.5 CIELAB units and a b* value of 25.5 to 30.5 CIELAB units, measured in each case in the alkyd resin according to DIN EN ISO 787-25:2007 as full shade.

(4) Colorimetry on the Al-containing iron oxides of the invention here takes place in a long-oil alkyd resin in accordance with DIN EN ISO 787-25:2007, preferably with the illuminant D65/10°, for example in WorléeKyd P 151 from Worlée Chemie GmbH.

(5) The Al-containing iron oxide of the invention is preferably present in a haematite structure. In this case the aluminium is located preferably at the octahedral lattice sites in substitution of Fe.sup.3+ ions.

(6) Preferred Al-containing iron oxides have a saturation C.sub.ab* of 39.8 to 44.6 CIELAB units. C.sub.ab* here represents the square root of the sum of the squares of a* and b*, measured in the varnish system above.

(7) The pigments of the invention preferably possess a heat stability measured in HDPE polyethylene at 1% pigmentation, determined according to DIN EN 12877-2 by a change (ΔC.sub.ab*) in the saturation (C.sub.ab*) of less than 3 CIELAB units, preferably less than 1.5 CIELAB units, on temperature increase from 200 to 320° C.

(8) In one preferred embodiment of the pigments of the invention, in the formula, the Al index x is a number from 0.01 to 0.10, more particularly from 0.025 to 0.075.

(9) Likewise preferred are pigments of the invention in which, in the formula, the Al index x is a number from 0.11 to 0.25, more particularly from 0.12 to 0.15.

(10) The pigments of the invention likewise preferably have a water content of less than 0.8 wt %, preferably of less than 0.5 wt %.

(11) In a further preferred embodiment, the pigments of the invention have a chloride content of less than 0.1 wt %, preferably less than 0.01 wt %, based on the pigment.

(12) The amount of manganese and chromium as well is preferably very small. The sum total of manganese and chromium is preferably less than 500 ppm, very preferably less than 100 ppm, based on the pigment.

(13) For magnesium as well it is the case that its proportion is preferably very low. The amount of magnesium is preferably less than 500 ppm, very preferably less than 100 ppm, based on the pigment.

(14) The pigments of the invention preferably have a specific surface area by the BET method of 6.5 to 12.5 m.sup.2/g.

(15) The pigments of the invention may also be coated. In that case they may have one or more coatings selected from organic and/or inorganic compounds.

(16) Organic coating materials include, for example, polyhydric alcohols, polyethylene glycols, polypropylene glycols, their etherification products with monohydric alcohols and esterification products with carboxylic acids, and also silicone oils.

(17) Suitable inorganic coating materials are preferably colourless oxides or hydroxides of Al, Si, Zr and Mg, especially Al.sub.2O.sub.3.

(18) Where the pigments of the invention are coated, the coating materials are employed preferably in an amount of 0.01 to 3 wt %, based on the pigment.

Process

(19) The invention further relates to a process for producing the pigments of the invention, comprising at least the steps of a) precipitation, b) oxidation and c) calcination, characterized in that: a1) an aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium, the molar ratio of iron ions to Al ions being 199:1 to 7:1, is reacted with an alkali metal hydroxide, such as NaOH, LiOH or KOH, more particularly NaOH, as alkaline compound, with the aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium being metered into the initial charge of the alkaline compound, preferably in the form of its aqueous solution, or a2) an aqueous solution comprising ions of iron and of sulfate is reacted with an alkali metal hydroxide, such as NaOH, LiOH or KOH, more particularly NaOH, as alkaline compound, and with at least one aluminium compound, preferably alkali metal aluminate, more particularly sodium aluminate, with the molar ratio of iron in the solution to aluminium in the aluminium compound being 199:1 to 7:1 and with the alkaline compound being introduced as an initial charge with at least one aluminium compound, preferably an alkali metal aluminate solution, in particular in the form of an aqueous solution, and the aqueous solution comprising ions of iron and of sulfate being metered in, b) the aqueous suspension obtained after step a) is oxidized in the presence of an oxidizing agent, and c) the oxidation product obtained after b) is calcined at a temperature of 500 to 1100° C. in an oxidizing atmosphere.

(20) The Fe:Al ratio of 199:1 to 7:1 here corresponds, in the target composition of Fe.sub.2-xAl.sub.xO.sub.3, to an x value of 0.01 to 0.25.

Precipitation a1)

(21) The aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium can be obtained by mixing corresponding sulfate-containing iron salt solutions with solutions containing aluminium ions, which in turn may be obtained individually from corresponding iron precursors and aluminium compounds, respectively.

(22) For example iron(II) sulfates for such iron sulfate solutions can be obtained from steel-pickling plants or from TiO.sub.2 production by the sulfate process, or by dissolving metallic iron, iron carbonates, iron hydroxides or iron oxides in sulfuric acid.

(23) For producing the pigments of the invention it is preferred to use very pure iron raw materials in the form of iron(II) sulfate solutions having a total iron content of 80 to 95 g/l and a sum content of manganese and chromium of less than 250 mg/l.

(24) The solution used preferably also includes a magnesium content of less than 500, preferably less than 100 ppm, based on the solution.

(25) Preferred for the precipitation according to step a) is an aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and aluminium in which the iron ions are present in the form of a mixture of iron(II) and iron(III) ions, preferably with an Fe(III) fraction of 5 to 30 mol %, more particularly 10 to 20 mol % Fe(III), based on the total amount of iron in the solution.

(26) Setting the correspondingly preferred Fe(III) fractions in the respective iron(II)/(III) sulfate mixture can be done either by adding corresponding amounts of iron salts, preferably of iron(III) sulfate, or by partial oxidation of the iron salt solution, preferably the iron(II) sulfate solution, with—for example—atmospheric oxygen, preferably at temperatures of 80° C. or above, in particular at 80 to 100° C., or with H.sub.2O.sub.2 at temperatures preferably of 20 to 70° C.

(27) Al components used in the aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium may be aluminium salts such as, for example, chlorides, sulfates or else nitrates, particular preference being given to Al(III) sulfates.

(28) The aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium for step a1) preferably contains a molar ratio of iron in the form of Fe(II) and/or Fe(III) to Al ions of 79:1 to 26:1, preferably of 17.2:1 to 7:1, more particularly of 15.7:1 to 12.3:1. An Fe:Al ratio of 79:1 to 26:1 here corresponds, in the target composition Fe.sub.2-xAl.sub.xO.sub.3, to an x value of 0.025 to 0.075; an Fe:Al ratio of 17.2:1 to 7:1 here corresponds to an x value of 0.11 to 0.25; and an Fe:Al ratio of 15.7:1 to 12.3:1 here corresponds to an x value of 0.12 to 0.15.

(29) The aqueous solutions comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium and used in accordance with the invention are provided preferably by mixing of the Fe(III)- and/or Fe(II)-containing sulfate solution and of corresponding Al-containing solutions.

(30) The reaction in step a1) is preferably accomplished by heating the alkaline compound as precipitant in a suitable reaction vessel with stirrer, gasification container and electrical heating to the reaction temperature.

(31) The reaction temperature is preferably 20 to 100° C., more particularly 80 to 100° C., more preferably 85 to 100° C.

(32) The aqueous solution comprising ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium is metered into the initial charge of the alkaline compound, preferably in the form of its aqueous solution. This addition is preferably made at the reaction temperature.

(33) The precipitation here takes place preferably at a pH of greater than 10, more particularly at a pH of 10.5 to 14.

(34) The addition is made preferably with stirring. If a particular ratio of Fe(II) and Fe(III) has already been set in the aqueous solution comprising the ions of iron, of sulfate and of aluminium, it is preferred to allow the precipitation reaction to proceed under inert gas.

(35) Optionally, however, the Fe(II)/(III) ratio may also be set only during the precipitation, by means of the above-described oxidation.

(36) The amount of alkaline compound to be used for the precipitation is a product of the amounts of the iron ions and aluminium ions, preference being given to a molar ratio of Fe.sub.total to OH.sup.− of 0.45 to 0.55 and also of Al(III) to OH.sup.− of 0.33, and also, optionally, of free acid present that is to be neutralized—sulfuric acid, for example.

Precipitation a2)

(37) In a further preferred embodiment of the invention, the procedure and the proportions of the iron ions to aluminium ions are fundamentally the same as in the case of the precipitation a1), with the difference being that the aluminium compound is not present in the iron(II)/(III) sulfate mixture but is instead introduced as an initial charge together with the alkaline compound serving as precipitant.

(38) The aluminium compound is preferably, for example, an aqueous Na aluminate solution which is mixed with the alkaline precipitant in order then to furnish the soluble Al ions.

(39) Suitable alkaline compounds serving as precipitant are those specified under a1).

(40) The alkaline precipitant is preferably included as an initial charge mixed with an alkali metal aluminate solution, and the iron(II)/(III) sulfate mixture is metered into this initial charge.

Oxidation b)

(41) The precipitation is followed by oxidation with an oxidizing agent. The oxidizing agent used is preferably an oxygen-containing gas, such as air, for example. This oxidation takes place preferably in the aqueous medium obtained after step a1) or a2), more particularly in the suspension obtained as a result of the precipitation. The oxidizing agent, more particularly the oxygen-containing gas, is preferably introduced into the aqueous medium obtained after step a1) or a2).

(42) The oxidation according to step b) here takes place in particular at a temperature of 20 to 100° C., more particularly at 80 to 100° C., very preferably at 85 to 100° C.

(43) The course of the oxidation and also the end of the oxidizing step can be checked, for example, by an EMF measurement using a commercial redox electrode in the reaction vessel. The depletion of dissolved iron(II) ions in the reaction mixture is indicated by a jump in potential.

(44) After oxidation has taken place, the pigment precursor, preferably the magnetite formed, is isolated by filtration and preferably washed, in particular until the filtrate conductivity is below 2000 μS/cm, preferably below 800 μS/cm, more preferably below 200 μS/cm. This is followed preferably by drying of the filter cake, in particular at a temperature of 30 to 250, preferably of 30 to 120° C.

Calcining c)

(45) The production of the Al-containing iron oxide pigments of the invention with the composition Fe.sub.2-xAl.sub.xO.sub.3 is accomplished by calcination of the oxidation product obtained after step b), preferably in the form of the isolated, washed and dried filter cake, also referred to as Al-containing magnetite, at a temperature of 500 to 1100° C., preferably of 600 to 975° C., preferably in the presence of an oxygen-containing gas, more particularly of air.

(46) During the calcination according to step c) of the process of the invention, it should be borne in mind that the level of optimum calcining temperature is dependent on the Al content of the oxidation product obtained after step b). The optimum calcining temperature here is the temperature at which the maximum a* value (red fraction) has been obtained. This may be determined in a series of different calcining temperatures.

(47) In order to improve further the coloristic properties and also the processing properties in binders and plastics, the pigments of the invention obtained after step c) may additionally be subjected to grinding and/or to coating.

(48) In the case of an inorganic coating, it is preferred for coating to follow step c). Preferred inorganic coating materials that are suitable are preferably colourless oxides or hydroxides of Al, Si, Zr and Mg, especially Al.sub.2O.sub.3.

(49) It is likewise preferred for the Al-containing iron oxides of the invention, with or without inorganic coating, to be subjected additionally to milling. Suitable milling methods are, for example, jet milling, pendulum milling or else wet milling operations.

(50) In the course of milling, it is possible with preference to add organic coating materials, examples being polyhydric alcohols, polyethylene glycols, polypropylene glycols, their etherification products with monohydric alcohols and esterification products with carboxylic acids, and also silicone oils. These coating materials may likewise act as milling assistants.

(51) The preferred quantities of coating materials for metered addition may be from 0.01 to 3 wt % in the case of inorganic coating materials and from 0.01 to 1 wt % in the case of organic coating materials. The sum total of organic and inorganic coating materials in this context is 0.01 to 3 wt %.

Use

(52) The invention further relates to the use of the pigments of the invention for colouring pastes, paints, plastics, paper and building materials.

Measurement Methods

Testing of Full-Shade Colorimetric Values

(53) The full-shade colorimetric values were determined according to DIN EN ISO 787-25:2007, using the test paste described below.

(54) 5 g of a thixotroped long-oil alkyd resin (WorléeKyd P 151) were applied to the bottom part of a plate paint dispersion machine (TFAM) with a plate diameter of 240 mm, and the red iron oxide pigment in question was processed with the test paste to form a coloured paste with a PVC (pigment volume concentration) of 10%.

(55) The test paste contains 95 wt % of alkyd resin (Worléekyd P 151 from Worlée-Chemie GmbH, DE) and 5 wt % of Luvotix HAT thixotropic agent (Lehmann & Voss & Co KG, DE). The Luvotix is incorporated by stirring into the alkyd resin which has been preheated at 70 to 75° C., and the mixed paste is heated at 95° C. until dissolution has taken place. After cooling, the paste is rolled free of bubbles on a triple-roll mill.

(56) The red pigments were weighed out according to

(57) $m_P=\frac{\mathrm{PVC}*m_b*{\rho }_p}{\left(100-\mathrm{PVC}\right)*{\rho }_b}$

(58) m.sub.P=mass of red iron oxide pigment

(59) PVC=pigment volume concentration

(60) m.sub.b=mass of binder

(61) ρ.sub.p=density of pigment

(62) ρ.sub.b=density of binder

(63) The completed paste was transferred to a paste plate and subjected to colorimetry on a Datacolor 600 colorimeter with the measuring geometry of d/8° and the illuminant D65/10° with gloss (CIELAB colour space according to DIN 5033 Part 7).

Determination of the Heat Stability of Red Iron Oxide Pigments in Polyethylene (High-Density Polyethylene, HD-PE)

(64) The heat stability in polyethylene (HD-PE) was tested by DIN EN 12 877-2 according to method B in full shade.

(65) HD-PE grade: DOW KT 10000 UE (pellets)

Processing Equipment

(66) Schwabenthan Polytest 30 P single-screw extruder

(67) Arburg 221 K-350-100 injection moulding machine

Colorimeter and Colorimetry

(68) Datacolor 600

(69) Measuring geometry d/8°

(70) Illuminant D65/10° with gloss

Procedure

(71) 14 g of red iron oxide pigment were mulled with 1400 g of HD-PE pellets (1% pigmentation) in a polythene pouch in a PE drum for 20 minutes. The batch was subsequently extruded in the single-screw extruder at 180° C. and 60 rpm. These predispersed pellets (3 mm particle size) were converted in the above injection moulding machine into PE plaques with dimensions of 6*4 cm and a thickness of 3 mm. The start temperature was 200° C. (likewise reference for the heat stability ΔC.sub.ab*), and the temperature was raised in 20° C. steps up to 320° C.

EXAMPLES

Inventive Example 1

(72) Conventional dissolution of metallic iron obtained electrolytically (commercial product of Allied Metals Corp.) and having an Mn and Cr content of <1 ppm in each case, in sulfuric acid (96 wt %, ultra-pure, diluted with water; commercial product from Bernd Kraft) was used to prepare an iron(II) sulfate solution having an Fe.sup.2+ content of 92.15 g/l, an Fe.sup.3+ content of 0.08 g/l, a free sulfuric acid content of 1.22 wt % and a pH of 0.9 (solution 1).

(73) Dissolution of metallic iron obtained electrolytically (commercial product of Allied Metals Corp.) and having an Mn and Cr content of <1 ppm in each case, in ultra-pure sulfuric acid (commercial product from Bernd Kraft) was used to produce in the same way a second portion of iron(II) sulfate solution. 12 mol of FeSO.sub.4 in the form of this solution were reacted with 12 mol of hydrogen peroxide in the form of 946 ml of a 35 wt % strength solution (commercial product from Merck) and with 5 mol of H.sub.2SO.sub.4 in the form of the aforementioned 96 wt % strength acid, the temperature rising from around 20 up to around 70°. This gave a predominantly iron(III)-containing sulfate solution with 64.6 g/l of Fe.sup.3+, 11.15 g/l of Fe.sup.2+ and 3.02 wt % of free sulfuric acid (solution 2).

(74) By mixing 12.45 l (15.4 kg) of solution 1, 3.12 l (3.82 kg) of solution 2 and 396 ml (523 g) of Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3 solution with an Al content of 4.3 wt % (commercial product of Feralco), an Fe(II)/Fe(III)/Al(III) sulfate mixture was produced which had a molar composition of 20.542 mol Fe(II), 3.625 mol Fe(III) and 0.833 mol Al(III) and a total volume of 16.0 l.

(75) A 30 l stirring vessel equipped with gasifier, heater, stirrer and liquid metering facilities was charged with 7.17 l of aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH content 316 g/l) and this initial charge was heated to 90° C. with N.sub.2 blanketing (80 l/h). The aforementioned Fe(II)/Fe(III)/Al(III) sulfate mixture was metered into this alkali solution at a uniform rate over the course of 45 minutes and at 90° C. with N.sub.2 blanketing and stirring.

(76) After the end of the precipitation reaction, oxidation took place at a temperature of 90° C. within a reaction time of 9.5 hours to form magnetite (oxidation product) by air introduction (about 40 l/h).

(77) A compilation of the batch quantities for the production of the oxidation product is given in Table 2.

(78) The aqueous suspensions of the oxidation products were filtered in a known way, washed to a filtrate conductivity <200 μS/cm and characterized as follows after drying of the filter cake at a temperature of 40° C.:

(79) Specific surface area by BET method: 32.6 m.sup.2/g

(80) Fe content: 67.9 wt %

(81) Al content: 1.0 wt %

(82) The oxidation product thus isolated was calcined in a chamber kiln at the optimum calcining temperature of 775° C. (accuracy ±5° C.) in a residence time of 30 minutes under an oxidizing atmosphere (in the presence of air). To determine the optimum calcining temperature, a variety of temperatures were trialled (see Table 3). The inventive pigment obtained was characterized—as indicated in Table 4—and tested coloristically in WorléeKyd P 151 (full shade) (for colorimetric values see Table 5).

(83) The same red pigment was processed in HD-PE and the heat stability was ascertained by measurement of the saturation C.sub.ab* as a function of the processing temperature between 200 and 320° C. (see Table 6 and FIG. 1).

Inventive Example 2

(84) The procedure in this example was as for Inventive Example 1, with the sulfate mixture having a molar composition of 19.833 mol Fe(II), 3.5 mol Fe(III) and 1.667 mol Al(III) and a total volume of 15.0 l. It was obtained by mixing 10.84 l (13.5 kg) of an iron(II) sulfate solution having an Fe.sup.2+ content of 99.21 g/l and Fe.sup.3+ content of 0.12 g/l and an H.sub.2SO.sub.4 content of 0.095 wt %; 3.03 l (3.705 kg) of solution 2 as in Inventive Example 1; and 1.1 l (1.36 kg) of an Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3 solution having an Al content of 3.3 wt % (commercial product from Feralco). The initial charge was 7.39 l of aqueous sodium hydroxide solution having an NaOH content of 316 g/l.

(85) The oxidation time was around 10.5 hours at 85° C.

(86) A compilation of the batch quantities for the production of the oxidation product is given in Table 2.

(87) The characterization of this oxidation product after drying yielded the following data:

(88) Specific surface area by BET method: 35.8 m.sup.2/g

(89) Fe content: 65.2 wt %

(90) Al content: 3.1 wt %

(91) The oxidation product was calcined in a chamber kiln at the optimum calcining temperature of 900° C. (accuracy ±5° C.) in a residence time of 30 minutes under an oxidizing atmosphere. To determine the optimum calcining temperature, a variety of temperatures were trialled (see Table 3). The inventive pigment obtained was characterized—as indicated in Table 4—and tested coloristically in WorléeKyd P 151 (full shade) (for colorimetric values see Table 5).

(92) The same red pigment was processed in HD-PE and, as described in Inventive Example 1, the heat stability was ascertained by measurement of the saturation C.sub.ab* (see Table 6 and FIG. 1).

Comparative Example I

(93) In this comparative example, an oxidation product without addition of Al was produced in accordance with the procedure of Inventive Example 1. The sulfate mixture in this case had a molar composition of 21.25 mol Fe(II) and 3.75 mol Fe(III) with a total volume of 16.3 l (see Table 2). It was obtained by mixing 13.79 l (16.93 kg) of an iron(II) sulfate solution having an Fe.sup.2+ content of 86.07 g/l, an Fe.sup.3+ content of 0.57 g/l and an H.sub.2SO.sub.4 content of 0.86 wt %, and also 2.49 l (3.12 kg) of an iron(III) sulfate solution having an Fe.sup.3+ content of 84.12 g/l, an Fe.sup.2+ content of 0.19 g/l and a free sulfuric acid content of 3.56 wt %. The initial charge was 7.53 l of aqueous sodium hydroxide solution with an NaOH content of 320 g/l.

(94) After an oxidation time of around 7 hours at 85° C. and after work-up of the aqueous suspension, an oxidation product was obtained which had the following data:

(95) Specific surface area by BET method: 19.0 m.sup.2/g

(96) Fe content: 70.4 wt %

(97) Al content: 0.01 wt %

(98) This oxidation product was calcined at the optimum calcining temperature of 700° C. (accuracy ±5° C.) with a residence time of 30 minutes in an oxidizing atmosphere in a chamber kiln. For the determination of the optimum calcining temperature, a variety of temperatures were trialled (see Table 3).

(99) The resulting non-inventive pigment without addition of Al was characterized—as indicated in Table 4—and tested coloristically in WorléeKyd P 151 (full shade) (for colorimetric values see Table 5).

(100) The same red pigment was processed in HD-PE and, as described in Inventive Example 1, the heat stability was determined by measurement of the saturation C.sub.ab* (see Table 6 and FIG. 1).

(101) The inventive Al-containing pigments from Inventive Examples 1 (0.81% Al) and 2 (2.2% Al) represent high-grade Al-containing red iron oxide pigments having specific surface areas by the BET method in the range from 8.6 to 9.6 m.sup.2/g and they exhibit very high chemical purity, characterized by Mn and Cr contents of in total below 100 ppm, by Cl contents of below 250 ppm and by low H.sub.2O contents of less than 0.01 wt % (see Table 5).

(102) Relative to the four prior-art red haematite pigments, the colorimetric values of the inventive Al-containing pigments in WorléeKyd P 151 (full shade) are significantly higher (see Table 5), thereby opening up new regions in the CIELAB colour space for red iron oxide pigments, specifically with:

(103) $\Delta a^{*}=0.7\mathrm{CIELAB}\mathrm{unit}\Delta b^{*}=5.2\mathrm{CIELAB}\mathrm{units}\Delta C^{*}=4.\mathrm{CIELAB}\mathrm{units}$

(104) At the same time, in comparison to the prior art, the inventive Al-containing red pigments are characterized by a significantly higher heat stability in HD-PE (as ΔC.sub.ab* values of 200 versus 320° C.; see Table 6) with a significantly higher saturation C.sub.ab*, specifically:

(105) ΔC.sub.ab* (inventive) up to −1.3 CIELAB units as against ΔC.sub.ab* (prior art) of −1.7 to −2.3 CIELAB units

(106) C.sub.ab* (inventive) up to 43.4 CIELAB units as against ΔC.sub.ab* (prior art) of up to 39.4 CIELAB units

Comparative Example II

(107) The Al-doped pigment described in EP-A 1380542 with the Fe:Al ratio of 95:5 was reproduced in accordance with the data in the example there. While FIG. 4B of EP'542 does contain the values of a* and b* for this example at various temperatures, it does not include the precise method by which this colour data was determined. The pigment produced according to the example of EP'542 was measured in the same way as for the determination of the colour data of the inventive examples above.

(108) For determination of the optimum calcining temperature, a variety of temperatures were trialled (see Table 3). In this case, as a further temperature relative to those of FIG. 4B from EP'542, 700° C. was tested as well, and emerged as being the optimum calcining temperature.

(109) The noninventive pigment obtained was characterized—as indicated in Table 4—and tested coloristically in WorléeKyd P 151 (full shade) (for colorimetric values see Table 5).

(110) In the test system of the present invention as well, the a* and b* values for the Fe:Al =95:5 system produced according to EP'542 are well outside the respective ranges of the invention.

Comparative Example III

(111) Inventive Example 1 was repeated, but using MgO rather than NaOH as precipitant, in half the molar quantity in accordance with the divalent nature of Mg, as employed for the production of Al-doped iron oxide in Example 7 of EP-A-187331. Moreover, the initial charge, rather than the NaOH, was the Fe(II)/Fe(III)/Al(III) sulfate mixture, and the MgO precipitant was added to this initial charge likewise as described in EP'331. Accordingly, the differences of a different precipitant and a different sequence of addition were transposed from EP'331 to Inventive Example 1 of the invention.

(112) The pigment produced was measured in analogy to the determination of colour data for the inventive examples above.

(113) For determination of the optimum calcining temperature, a variety of temperatures were trialled (see Table 3). A contrast with Inventive Example 2 is found in FIG. 2.

(114) The noninventive pigment obtained was characterized—as indicated in Table 4—and tested coloristically in WorléeKyd P 151 (full shade) (for colorimetric values see Table 5).

(115) In the present test system of the present invention as well, the a* and b* values for the Example 7 produced in analogy to EP'331 are well outside the respective ranges of the invention.

(116) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Batch quantities for producing the oxidation products (step b) Examples FeSO.sub.4/ Oxidation Batch quantities in mol NaOH products Me.sub.tot Fe.sub.tot Fe(II) Fe(III) Al(III) ratio Inventive 25 24.167 20.542 3.625 0.833 0.541 Example 1 Inventive 25 23.333 19.833 3.5 1.667 0.484 Example 2 Comparative 25 25 21.25 3.75 0 0.484 Example I

(117) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Determination of the optimum calcining temperatures (colorimetric values in WorléeKyd P 151, full shade, illuminant D65/10°) Calcining Spec. surface area Colour values, full shade Pigment temperature [° C.] (BET)[m.sup.2/g] a* b* Inventive Example 1 700 13.9 26.1 23.9 750 11.8 27.5 24.0 775 8.6 31.9 25.9 800 7.5 31.8 25.1 825 5.7 30.7 22.4 850 4.7 30.2 21.2 900 3.0 25.2 14.0 Inventive Example 2 700 14.2 31.4 28.9 750 13.4 31.2 29.1 800 11.8 31.4 29.6 850 11.6 31.7 29.8 900 9.6 32.1 29.6 950 8.5 31.5 29.2 Comparative 600 7.9 29.1 21.0 Example I 650 7.1 29.8 21.1 700 6.2 30.1 20.7 750 5.7 30.0 20.0 800 4.9 29.4 18.8 Comparative 300 26.7 24.3 19.8 Example II 500 20.4 25.8 20.5 650 17.1 27.8 22.6 700 14.9 28.1 22.9 800 10.3 27.7 23.2 1000 3.1 23.8 14.8 Comparative 650 21.1 26.3 19.5 Example III 700 12.9 26.8 19.7 750 11.3 27.3 20.0 800 8.0 27.7 19.9 850 5.9 27.5 19.4 900 4.3 25.7 17.7 950 2.4 19.7 13.1

(118) The optimum calcining temperature is highlighted by bold text.

(119) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Characterization of the pigments of the invention after calcining of the oxidation products Optimum calcining temperature Specific for the red surface area Analytical values pigment (BET) Fe total Al Mn Cr Cl Pigment [° C.] [m.sup.2/g] [wt %] [wt %] X* [ppm] [ppm] [ppm] Inventive 775 8.6 69  0.81 0.047 <1   22 3 Example 1 Inventive 900 9.6 66 2.2 0.129  2.1 13 8 Example 2 Comparative 700 6.2 70.4 <0.01 <0.001  n.d.** n.d.** n.d.** Example I Comparative 700 14.9 n.d.**   1.7***  0.1*** n.d.** n.d.** n.d.** Example II Comparative 800 8.0 58.9 1.3 0.08  29** n.d.** n.d.** Example III *in relation to Fe.sub.2-xAl.sub.xO.sub.3, **not determined *** as per data from EP′542

(120) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Colorimetric values in WorleeKyd P 151 (full shade, illuminant 065/10°) Pigments Al contents as per invention a* b* C.sub.ab* [wt%] x Inventive Example 1 31.9 25.9 41.1 0.81 0.047 Inventive Example 2 32.1 29.9 43.9 2.2 0.129 Comparative 30.0 20.7 36.5 <0.01 <0.001 Example I Comparative 28.1 22.9 36.3 1.7*** 0.1*** Example II Comparative 27.7 19.9 34.1 1.3 0.8 Example Ill Red pigments Al contents as per prior art a* b* C.sub.ab* [wt%] x R1599 D 31.4 24.5 39.9 — Example 1 31.1 24.7 39.6 — WO 2016/038152 Example 3 31.3 23 38.8 1.0 0.059 DE 102004/024013 Al Example 1 30.2 23 38 0.95 0.056 DE 2836941 Al as per data from EP’542

(121) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Data for Fig. 1 DE 2836941 Inventive Inventive Comparative R 1599D A1 Processing Example Example Example (Huntsman) Example 1 temperature[° C.] 1 C.sub.ab* 2 C.sub.ab* C.sub.ab* C.sub.ab* C.sub.ab* 200 38.9 43.2 34.3 38.8 39.4 220 39.2 43.3 34.7 38.9 39.3 240 39.3 43.4 35.1 38.6 39.1 260 39.3 43.1 34.8 38.4 38.6 280 39.2 42.9 34.4 38.1 37.9 300 39 42.2 33.6 37.5 37.6 320 38.9 41.9 33.2 37.1 37.1 ΔC.sub.ab* (for ΔT ± 0 -1.3 -1.1 -1.7 -2.3 200 to 320° C.)