Honeycomb sandwich sheet or panel, based on thermoplastic polypropylene

20170087797 ยท 2017-03-30

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

A honeycomb sandwich sheet or panel, based on thermoplastic polypropylene, includes a structure having two flat outer films, thermowelded to a central film that includes a thermoformed blister film, with blisters repeated in a regular and continuous pattern, the flat outer films including a coextruded two-layer film, based on thermoplastic polypropylene, wherein the inner layer faces the central thermoformed film, and the central thermoformed blister film includes a coextruded three-layer film, based on thermoplastic polypropylene, wherein the two outer layers face the flat outer films, and wherein the structure includes and additional layer C thermowelded to the outer layer of the two flat outer films.

Claims

1. A honeycomb sandwich sheet or panel, based on thermoplastic polypropylene, comprising: a structure having two flat outer films, thermowelded to a central film consisting of a thermoformed blister film, with blisters repeated in a regular and continuous pattern, said flat outer films comprising a coextruded two-layer film (AB), based on thermoplastic polypropylene, wherein an inner layer (A) of the two-layer film faces the central thermoformed blister film and the central thermoformed blister film is a coextruded three-layer film (ABA) based on thermoplastic polypropylene, wherein two outer layers (A) of the a coextruded three-layer film (ABA) each face one of the flat outer films, and wherein said structure comprises an additional layer (C), thermowelded to an outer layer (B) of the two flat outer films.

2. The sandwich sheet or panel according to claim 1, wherein the additional layer (C) includes a continuous filament fiber network or technical fabric, said network or technical fabric comprising or substantially consisting of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene, polyamide, glass fiber or other polyolefin, and/or a mixture thereof.

3. The sandwich sheet or panel according to claim 2, wherein the additional layer (C) includes a pre-coupled structure, which comprises the network or technical fabric and an aesthetic fabric, and wherein the network or technical fabric is in contact with the outer layer (B) of the two flat outer films.

4. The sandwich sheet or panel according to claim 1, wherein the additional layer (C) has a pre-coupled structure that includes a continuous filament network or technical fabric, comprising polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene, polyamide, glass fiber, or other polyolefin and/or a mixture thereof, and an aesthetic finishing fabric which is needled, TNT, or dilour.

5. The sandwich sheet or panel according to claim 1, wherein thermoplastic polypropylene comprises polypropylene comprising talc, glass fiber, and/or polyamide.

6. The sandwich sheet or panel according to claim 1, wherein said sandwich sheet or panel has the following structure C/BA/ABA/AB/C having: the additional layer C thermowelded to the outer layer B of the top outer film; the flat coextruded outer film (BA); the coextruded central film (ABA); the flat coextruded outer film (AB); and the additional layer C thermowelded to the outer layer B of the outer bottom film.

7. The sandwich sheet or panel according to claim 1, wherein the layers of the outer film and of the central film have a same composition or a different composition.

8. A method of use of a honeycomb sandwich sheet or panel, comprising: providing a honeycomb sheet or panel comprising: a structure having two flat outer films, thermowelded to a central film consisting of a thermoformed blister film, with blisters repeated in a regular and continuous pattern, said flat outer films comprising a coextruded two-layer film (AB), based on thermoplastic polypropylene, wherein an inner layer (A) of the two-layer film faces the central thermoformed blister film and the central thermoformed blister film is a coextruded three-layer film (ABA) based on thermoplastic polypropylene, wherein two outer layers (A) of the a coextruded three-layer film (ABA) each face one of the flat outer films, and wherein said structure comprises an additional layer (C), thermowelded to an outer layer (B) of the two flat outer films; and installing the honeycomb sheet or panel as a structural panel in a building, as an aesthetic panel in furniture-, or as an automotive interior panel.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the honeycomb sheet or panel is installed as a structural panel in a building, and wherein the additional layer (C) has a structure that includes a continuous filament network/technical fabric comprising or substantially consisting of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene, polyamide, glass fiber, or other polyolefin, and/or a mixture thereof.

10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the honeycomb sheet or panel is installed as an aesthetic panel in furniture or as an automotive interior panel, wherein the additional layer (C) has a pre-coupled structure consisting of a continuous filament network or technical fabric based on polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene, or polyamide or glass fiber, and an aesthetic finishing fabric which is needled, TNT, or dilour.

11. A process of producing a honeycomb sandwich sheet or panel based on thermoplastic polypropylene according to one claim 1, comprising: thermowelding two flat outer layers consisting of a coextruded two-layer film (AB), based on thermoplastic polypropylene, wherein an inner layer (A) of the two-layer film faces a central thermoformed film comprising a central thermoformed blister film consisting of a coextruded three-layer film (ABA) based on thermoplastic polypropylene, and the two outer layers (A) that face the flat outer layers, and thermowelding, on an outer layer (B) of the two-layer films, two additional layers (C), consisting of a continuous filament network or technical fabric comprising polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene, polyamide, fiber glass or other polyolefin, and/or a mixture thereof.

12. The process according to claim 11, wherein the two additional layers (C) comprised an aesthetic finishing fabric which is needled, TNT, or dilour.

Description

EXAMPLE 1

[0060] Sheet with a weight of 1500 g/m.sup.2 [0061] Diameter of blister: d8 mm [0062] Composition of outer films (top and bottom): [0063] Layer B: [0064] 24.5% PP copolymer (melt flow index=4 g/10 min); [0065] 30% PP homopolymer (melt flow index=3 g/10 min); [0066] 45% master mixture comprising 60% of calcium carbonate and 40% of PP homopolymer; [0067] 0.5% master mixture comprising 40% of titanium dioxide. [0068] Layer A: [0069] 70% PP binder (melt flow index=5 g/10 min); [0070] 30% PP copolymer (melt flow index=4 g/10 min); [0071] The central film envisages layers A and B having the same composition as the top and bottom films indicated above. [0072] Weight distribution of the films: [0073] Top film/central film/bottom film=40/20/40% [0074] Composition of layer C: [0075] a continuous filament technical fabric based on PET was used, having a grammage of 250 g (for example). [0076] The panel obtained has a total weight equal to 0.780 kg/m.sup.2.

[0077] It has a weight reduction equal to 60% approximately with respect to materials of the state of the art available on the market, as can be seen from the following comparative table, in which there is a comparison of rear seatback panels for rear seats produced in different materials:

TABLE-US-00002 Product Tot/kg Panel Example 1 0.780 kg Plastic panel 1.01274168 kg injection moulded Sheet-metal panel 1.870593456 kg Plastic panel 3.260521436 kg roto-moulded

[0078] The sheet thus obtained was subjected to two different tests for testing its shock resistance and safety when used as rear seatback panel for rear seats.

Test 1

ECE Safety Centre Test

[0079] The panel obtained according to Example 1 was tested as a rear seatback panel for rear seats to verify its efficiency in protecting the occupants of the vehicle from displacements/movements of luggage.

[0080] A test was effected according to what is provided on pages 54-59 of Annex 9 of Regulation n17 (Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the seats, their anchorages and any head restraints) of the Agreement Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (E/ECE/324 E/ECE/TRANS/505 (REV.1/ADD.16/REV.4) of Jul. 31, 2002.

[0081] In particular, as provided by this regulation, the efficiency of the panel obtained according to Example 1 was tested as a rear seatback panel for rear seats, in which the test blocks were positioned as indicated in FIG. 2 and in FIG. 3, with the following results: [0082] panel according to the invention: resisted impact and did not break; [0083] sheet metal panel: was deformed; [0084] injection plastic panel: broke, as it is extremely rigid and therefore not suitable for absorbing energy; [0085] plastic panel obtained by retromoulding: broke in the fixing areas, as it is extremely rigid and therefore not suitable for absorbing energy.

Test 2

[0086] The panel obtained according to Example 1 was tested to verify its resistance and safety by means of the Drop Test Chrysler at 29 n chap. PF-12146. (pages 20-21 Change A: 2011-10-31).

[0087] More specifically, a test sample having dimensions of 345 mm345 mm was tested as provided in the last line of Table 11 on page 21 which describes the dynamic test for thermoplastic materials.

[0088] As shown in FIG. 4, a load of 20 kg was used, consisting of a cylinder having a diameter of 102 mm, which was dropped in two different points of the test sample from a height of over 200 mm, at a temperature of 60 C. and at a temperature of 29 C.: [0089] in both points and at both temperatures, the test sample sustained the impact, showing a slight deformation of the surface in contact with the cylinder.

[0090] The sound of a fracture in the inner blister structure was perceived.

[0091] The whole test was repeated twice, obtaining the same result. More specifically, no structural breakage or loss of functioning was observed.